Architecture difference between Hyperion 7.x, 9.x and 11.x

Hi Guys,
Can any one tell me what is the architecture difference between Hyperion 7.x, 9.x and 11.x
Regards
Avinash BI

Here are the links I have:
11.1.2.1
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-foundation/epm-component-architecture-11121-354678.ppt
11.1.1.3
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-foundation/epm-components-fd-11113-128366.ppt

Similar Messages

Architecture differences between Hyperion System 9 and Hyperion System 11

Hi,
Can any one let me know what is the difference in Architecture between Hyperion system 9 and Hyperion System 11?
I need it urgently. If any one has info around this kindly share with me or send some document in this respect to my mail id [email protected]
Kindly send the info.
Regards,
Ramachandran J

Hi Ramachandran,
1. Its impractical to list out the all architecture differences .
2. In short , the over all architecture of the whole suite is more or less similar to 9X(with lot of new features and tools too) , this is in comparision with 7X and system9( which was a complete paradigm shift ,as they got closely integrated in 9) , and in 11X its even more tightly integration and thats why named as fusion.
3. More info about features ...etc , you got to refer docs, no other alternative.
Sandeep Reddy Enti
HCC
http://hyperionconsultancy.com/

Differences between Hyperion 9.3.1 and 11

Hi All,
Can any one let me know the full differences between Hyperion 9.3.1 and 11 version.
Kindly let me know immedietly ......
Thanks in advance,
Ramachandran J

Hi,
For all the products have a look at the new features documentation at :- http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12825_01/index.htm
If it is just planning then have a read of :- http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12825_01/epm.111/hp_new_features/new_features.html
Ok?
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Difference between Hyperion Essbase Version 6.1.4 and 7.1.3

Hi All,
Can anyone give me some information on differences between Hyperion Essbase version 6.1.4 and version 7.1.3.
TIA,
KRIS.

Have a look at :- https://support.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&id=1092114.1
and "Legacy Essbase Cumulative Feature Overview Tool"
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

What is the basic difference between Hyperion Planning and HFM

Hi GURU'S,
what is the basic difference between Hyperion Planning and HFM and when do we choose them.

On a high level the difference is this:
1. HFM is best for global collection (collecting data from scattered entities), group consolidation and for easily structuring financial reporting (mainly consisting of financial data)
2. Planning is best for modeling your business, starting from a demand forecast and arriving to capacity planning and finally to financial statements, by utilizing business drivers (non-financial data like volumes, prices, productivity rates etc)
Of course, differences may be analyzed at several levels down to technical, but the discussion may turn out to be too long, yet adding little value to the question: "when do we choose the one over the other". Bear in mind that your requirements may turn out that you need both.

What is major difference between hyperion planning and hyperion essbase

hi
what is the differences between hyperion planning and hyperion essbase.i dont know about planning much.but as far i know.i think we can do every thing in essbase also(planning,budgeting and forecasting)
what u say.what we actually do in planning.
regards
bharat

Hi Bharat
Although as you mention in your post Essbase can do plans/budgets etc it may not be simple to provide complex planning process control and ease of data entry etc.
Planning delivers these benefits and some through web delivered components such as forms, business rules and workflow for instance. There are some restrictions to using planning and these need tobe well understood before embarking on a project.
It would be worth having a look at product sheets from Oracle and/or presentations from various events to get a feel for planning capabilities.
Hope this helps.
Andy King
http://www.analitica.co.uk

Difference between Hyperion version 11.1.1.3 and epm 11.1.2.1

Hi,
Can anybody suggest me the difference between Hyperion version 11.1.1.3 and EPM 11.1.2.1?
Thanks In Advance

Take a look at the “Installation and Configuration Guide.”
log file..start the server and see the log file
The 11.1.2.1 release also includes new features for upgrading from previous versions. There are several new utilities and enhancements to make the upgrade process easier. You will see some of these new features during the configuration of the various products
Apart from diffrance
Ima not sure y Windows 2008 support in Hyperion 11.1.2 brought with it a host of new challenges..(atleast to make copyrighted windows copys now onwards lol)
Windows 2008 introduced a new feature called User Access Control (UAC). while installing person need to have admin privillage other wise it HELL (nightmare ) and some unexpectedly problematic issues though security is good but .................
Have a read on this
oracle-hyperion-epm-system-certific-131801.xls(google u will get it) at least u get some idea what are new hardware req and software reqs
Some Support answers as well
https://support.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&doctype=TROUBLESHOOTING&id=1313155.1#aref3
hope u get some idea

Difference between Hyperion Financial Reporting version 7.0 and 9.3.1 ?

Hi All,
Can you please difine Difference between Hyperion Financial Reporting version 7.0 and 9.3.1 ?

I migrated from 7.5 to 9.3.1 a couple years back so hopefully this is somewhat helpful.
From a developer perspective, the report designer itself looks about the same. The most annoying changes for me were that they started migrating functionality AWAY from the client program and to the web. For instance, managing security is a pain as it is done through Workspace and it is a bit clunkly. I also ran into some issues where my old report's security information is not visible in Workspace. It is still 'working', but when you view report properties, it shows nothing for who has assigned security. Also, things like deleting/moving reports and creating folders are done through workspace and not the client program. "Copying" can be done through the client program by using "Save As" functionality.
There is a migration tool to move your old stuff to 9.3.1. It seemed to work OK; however, the User Interface was a bit screwy. For instance, it said I was 138% complete when it finished. It copied more reports than it showed as existing.... :)
On the back end, things changed quite a bit. In the older Financial Reports, the report objects existing in a single database table and if you wanted to, you could extract everything from that table. In 9.3.1, part of the information is in Workspace database (i.e. Report names/ID's, security access, hierarchy) and the actual report file itself is stored in a psedo-filesystem under the RM webapp. The names are not user friendly at all and you'll need to XREF from the database to make sense of it. When you finally find the actual report "file", they are compressed/encrypted.
From an end user perspective, things pretty much work the same way as always.

Differences between Hyperion Workspace, Web Analysis and Financial Reportin

Hello,
Can anybody explain me the differences between Hyperion Workspace, Web Analysis and Financial Reporting?
Thank you

In real simple terms....
Financial reporting - Perfect for producing standardised monthly reporting such as P&L, balance sheets etc. Highly formatted, print well in PDF format.
Web Analysis - Highly graphical, web based analysis tool more suited to dashboards, pinboards etc with slice and dice capability.
Workspace - Common environment where reporting content in deployed. Users can access web anlysis, fin reports, Interactive reports plus other content through the workspace. It was the start of the 'log on to one place for all reporting' concept instead og logging on to multiple products.
Hope that helps
Regards
CD

Difference between using app server connection pooling and using the driver

Hi all,
How to get connection pooling with out application server and tomcat also?
What is the difference between using app server connection pooling and using the driver supported connection pooling?
Regards,
Murali

maybe the performance of App server pool is better than the JDBC pool,
for you don't know wether the implementation of the JDBC interface is good or bad.

What the difference between u0093Valuate GL Account Open Itemsu0094 and u0093Valuate G/

hi gurus
What the difference between Valuate GL Account Open Items and Valuate G/L Account Balances?
We found out that when we perform valuate GL account Open items there will be reversal done at the same time whereas when we perform Valuate G/L Account Balances there is NO reversal posting even though we hv entered the reversal posting date and Period.
Pls advise which one we should perform?

Valuate GL Account Open Items are for open item managed accounts including vendor/customer accounts. The valuation is performed for each (open) line items on key date specified.
"Valuate GL Balance" is for account NOT managed on Open Item basis but managed in foreign currency. The period balance of key date in foreign currency is valuated. Reversal document can be created by selecting 'Reverse postings' in "Postings" tab.
Kyoko

Difference between the design of clusters PCLx and others like RFBLG etc .

There are a few nagging questions which I was not able to find in the forum hence i have to post a new question.
I am a little confused about the difference between the different clusters .
If i start with RFBLG i.e. the cluster for BSEG BSEC etc ,I can see that the tables which are part of this cluster
can be viewed through different methods like
1) whr usd list for RFBLG
2) dd02l table and give the required parameters there
now when I compare this with another so-called cluster PCL1 if find that PCL1 is not recognized as a cluster
and also I am not able to see the same in dd02l table when i give PCL1 and the tabtype as cluster which I was able to see
for the RFBLG ,there are other tables similar to RFBLG .
1) SO what is the difference between the RFBLG type of clusters and the PCLx type of cluster
2) are pclx and rfblg..type of clusters same ?
3) why does PCL1 shows that it is a transparent table ? where as rfblg shows in a diff way in se11
4) i know we access data from PCL1 using import and export stmts ,DO OR CAN WE DO THE SAME FOR RFBLG
5) I found that each and evry cluster table had diff fields ,this was kinda surprising for me as I had been thinking
that all cluster tables need to follow a certain rule ,SO WHO DECIDES THE FIELDS OF A TABLE CLUSTER ?
6) PCL1 has the index button enabled ,which again I think is not according to the cluster table rules?how?
7) I understand that we can save data in form of internal tables in the PCL1 cluster ,can we do the same in RFBLG ?
8) Can I think on lines that PCL1 and RFBLG type of cluster are two totally different types of data dictionary objects
and the usage and implementation of both of them is different and that the design and the BASE of both of such objects
is different .
I know this is a long list but I am sure that answers to these questions would really require some one who has really really work hard and invested a lot of time in understanding the dictionary system.I am awaiting a few answers ,few hints and a healthy discussion till we get them .
Thanks ...
a

Hello,
1/
BSEG is a typical Cluster Table.
This means that the physical table BSEG does NOT exist in the database, physical data for BSEG is stored in the database (table) cluster RFBLG.
In ABAP however you can perform selects on BSEG (with all fields from the SAP repository structure, see SE11 on BSEG), during execution the SAP database layer will translate these statements to physical selects in the RFBLG database table, so in ABAP this is transparant.
More info :
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cf/21f083446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cf/21f083446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm]
2/
PCL1, PCL2, ... are normal SAP transparent tables, however in HR they are often called HR cluster table.
Transparent tables are SAP objects where there is also a database table with the same name that contains the physical data.
However the PCL tables are somewhat different from normal transparent tables (data is compressed, external programs can not interpret the data, ...).
This means that in ABAP you can not use simple SQL statements to access data in PCL tables (because of compressed format).
In stead statements like EXPORT TO DATABASE and IMPORT FROM DATABASE need to be used.
More info :
[http://fuller.mit.edu/hr/cluster_tables.html|http://fuller.mit.edu/hr/cluster_tables.html]
Wim

Is there any difference between R/3 4.7 version and ECC 5.0????

Hi All,
Is there any difference between R/3 4.7 version and ECC 5.0 for the transaction RSA5.
Regards,
Andy

Andy
Functionality wise I didn't see any difference other than new datasources in ECC5.0
Thnaks
Sat

What is the difference between credit memo in invoice year and in next year

Hi!
I'm new here.I'm study SAP ERP.I don't know what is the difference between credit memo in invoice year and credit memo in next year (asset accounting).Can you show and give me an example, please!
Thanks and best regards!
Edited by: dinhtuan on Jun 28, 2010 3:10 PM

Hi,
Maybe have a look at the SAP Help for further information (http://help.sap.com) : e.g. 'Posting Credit Memos Integrated with Vendor' or 'Posting a Credit Memo Offset Against a Clearing Account'
Transaction type 105 for credit memo on current acquisition made in the current year, posting key 75. Or transaction type 160 for credit memo on acquisitions from prior years. posting key 75.
Note: determine if the asset was acquired in the current fiscal year or in a closed fiscal year (Display asset values).
If the asset was acquired in a fiscal year that is now closed, correct the past depreciation using a write-up (in that case check out and refer to Posting Write-Ups).
I hope this helps.
Kind regards,
Brigitte

What is the difference between these two reports MC.1 and MB5L

Hi
what is the difference between these two reports MC.1 and MB5L?
what is the Purpose of each report?
Material ledger is activated for this plant, we found some amount difference between these two reports, my client accounting department used to compare these two reports while year end/month end closing
Thanks
Raju

MC.1 will give you the report for plant analysis as per plant .
MB5L report will give you list of stock value as per G/L account wise.

Architecture difference between Hyperion 7.x, 9.x and 11.x

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for