Archive generation is too high

HI
Archive generation is too high in my 11i instance the database is 10g every 7 minutes a 100mb(size of redo log is 100mb) archive is generated.
There are 15 seeded programs running at a schdule of 1 minutes to 2 minutes can some one give me any tips as to waht has to be done.
Regards

Hi,
Please refer to this thread.
Archive generation
Archive generation
Regards,
Hussein

Similar Messages

  • Excessive archive generation

    DB: 817
    OS : Sun 5.3
    Suddenly my db started generating too many archive logs, normally it used to generate dozens of archive logs in a day, now a day's it's started generating in 2 to 3 minutes, Nothing has been change in the database side and at application side. What could be the obviosu reason for the same?

    Hi Vignesh,
    Thanks for the reply, I have checked, there is no background job or process is running.... Still rate of archive generation is very high.

  • Archive log writes frequency rate (4.73 minute(s)) is too high

    hello,
    DB version=10.2.0.1.0
    OS sun Solaris 5.10
    i got one alert telling
    Archive log writes frequency rate (4.73 minute(s)) is too high could someone help me out to know what is this error and what causingit to occure?
    thanks

    Raman wrote:
    please go throrgh this URL
    http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_redo_log_tuning.htm
    Well, the first step on that is wrong. The link in the step corrects it. However, both pages advocate putting redo logs on SSD, and if you google about for recent blog postings about that, you see that that is a bad idea. Even on Exadata, it only works because it is also writing to normal spinning rust, and says the write to redo is done when the first write is acknowledged. For normal non-Exadata databases, it's at best an expensive waste of time, and at worst shows up the deterioration of SSD's as redo log corruption. So, you might not want to link there.
    You should size the redo for the data rate expected at maximum, and use the parameters CKPT mentioned to switch for normal operating data rates.

  • PGC...data rate too high

    Hallo,
    message
    nunew33, "Mpeg not valid error message" #4, 31 Jan 2006 3:29 pm describes a certain error message. The user had problems with an imported MPEG movie.
    Now I receive the same message, but the MPEG that is causing the problem is created by Encore DVD itself!?
    I am working with the german version, but here is a rough translation of the message:
    "PGC 'Weitere Bilder' has an error at 00:36:42:07.
    The data rate of this file is too high for DVD. You must replace the file with one of a lower data rate. - PGC Info: Name = Weitere Bilder, Ref = SApgc, Time = 00:36:42:07"
    My test project has two menus and a slide show with approx. 25 slides and blending as transition. The menus are ok, I verified that before.
    First I thought it was a problem with the audio I use in the slide show. Because I am still in the state of learning how to use the application, I use some test data. The audio tracks are MP3s. I learned already that it is better to convert the MP3s to WAV files with certain properties.
    I did that, but still the DVD generation was not successful.
    Then I deleted all slides from the slide show but the first. Now the generation worked!? As far as a single slide (an image file) can not have a bitrate per second, and there was no sound any more, and as far as the error message appears AFTER the slide shows are generated, while Encore DVD is importing video and audio just before the burning process, I think that the MPEG that is showing the slide show is the problem.
    But this MPEG is created by Encore DVD itself. Can Encore DVD create Data that is not compliant to the DVD specs?
    The last two days I had to find out the cause for a "general error". Eventually I found out that image names must not be too long. Now there is something else, and I still have to just waste time for finding solutions for apparent bugs in Encore DVD. Why doesn't the project check find and tell me such problems? Problem is that the errors appear at the end of the generation process, so I always have to wait for - in my case - approx. 30 minutes.
    If the project check would have told me before that there are files with file names that are too long, I wouldn't have had to search or this for two days.
    Now I get this PGC error (what is PGC by the way?), and still have no clue, cause again the project check didn't mention anything.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Christian Kirchhoff

    Hallo,
    thanks, Ruud and Jeff, for your comments.
    The images are all scans of ancient paintings. And they are all rather dark. They are not "optimized", meaning they are JPGs right now (RGB), and they are bigger then the resolution for PAL 3:4 would require. I just found out that if I choose "None" as scaling, there is no error, and the generation of the DVD is much, much faster.
    A DVD with a slide show containing two slides and a 4 second transition takes about 3 minutes to generate when the scaling is set to something other than "None". Without scaling it takes approx. 14 seconds. The resulting movies size is the same (5,35 MB).
    I wonder why the time differs so much. Obviously the images have to be scaled to the target size. But it seems that the images are not scaled only once, that those scaled versions of the source images are cached, and those cached versions are used to generate then blend effect, but for every frame the source images seem to be scaled again.
    So I presume that the scaling - unfortunately - has an effect on the resulting movie, too, and thus influences the success of the process of DVD generation.
    basic situation:
    good image > 4 secs blend > bad image => error
    variations:
    other blend times don't cause an error:
    good image > 2 secs blend > bad image => success
    good image > 8 secs blend > bad image => success
    other transitions cause an error, too:
    good image > 4 secs fade to black > bad image => error
    good image > 4 secs page turn > bad image => error
    changing the image order prevents the error:
    bad image > 4 secs blend > good image => success
    changing the format of the bad image to TIFF doesn't prevent the error.
    changing colors/brightness of the bad image: a drastic change prevents the error. I adjusted the histogram and made everything much lighter.
    Just a gamma correction with values between 1.2 and 2.0 didn't help.
    changing the image size prevents the error. I decreased the size. The resulting image was still bigger than the monitor area, thus it still had to be scaled a bit by Encore DVD, but with this smaller version the error didn't occur. The original image is approx. 2000 px x 1400 px. Decreasing the size by 50% helped. Less scaling (I tried 90%, 80%, 70% and 60%, too) didn't help.
    using a slightly blurred version (gaussian blur, 2 px, in Photoshop CS) of the bad image prevents the error.
    My guess is that the error depends on rather subtle image properties. The blur doesn't change the images average brightness, the balance of colors or the size of the image, but still the error was gone afterwards.
    The problem is that I will work with slide shows that contain more images than two. It would be too time consuming to try to generate the DVD over and over again, look at which slide an error occurs, change that slide, and then generate again. Even the testing I am doing right now already "ate" a couple of days of my working time.
    Only thing I can do is to use a two image slide show and test image couple after image couple. If n is the number of images, I will spend (n - 1) times 3 minutes (which is the average time to create a two slides slide how with a blend). But of course I will try to prepare the images and make them as big as the monitor resolution, so Encore DVD doesn't have to scale the images any more. That'll make the whole generation process much shorter.
    If I use JPGs or TIFFs, the pixel aspect ratio is not preserved when the image is imported. I scaled one of the images in Photoshop, using a modified menu file that was installed with Encore DVD, because it already has the correct size for PAL, the pixel aspect ratio and the guides for the save areas. I saved the image as TIFF and as PSD and imported both into Encore DVD. The TIFF is rendered with a 1:1 pixel aspect ratio and NOT with the D1/DV PAL aspect ration that is stored in the TIFF. Thus the image gets narrowed and isn't displayed the way I wanted it any more. Only the PSD looks correct. But I think I saw this already in another thread...
    I cannot really understand why the MPEG encoding engine would produce bit rates that are illegal and that are not accepted afterwards, when Encore DVD is putting together all the stuff. Why is the MPEG encoding engine itself not throwing an error during the encoding process? This would save the developer so much time. Instead they have to wait until the end, thinking everything went right, and find out then that there was a problem.
    Still, if sometime somebody finds out more about the whole matter I would be glad about further explanations.
    Best regards,
    Christian

  • No Server Name displyed in mail notification Alert generated by "total CPU Utilization Percentage is too high" Monitor

    Hello Everyone,
    I need your assisstance in one of the issues with Mail Notification Alert generated by SCOM.
    Mail notification received as below:
    Alert: Total CPU Utilization Percentage is too high
    Severity: 2
    ServerName:Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard  - The threshold for the Processor\% Processor Time\_Total performance counter has been exceeded. The values that exceeded the threshold are: 97.091921488444015% CPU and a processor queue length of 16.
    Last modified by: System
    The Alert was generated by "Total CPU Utilization Percentage"
    But the problem with the above mail notification is it doesn't mentions about the affected server. So I would like to know how to tweak the monitors to provide the server name into it.
    Thanks & Regards,
    VROAN

    Hi 
    You can add alert source to the email format in the scom server.
    refer below link for parameters 
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinholman/archive/2007/12/12/adding-custom-information-to-alert-descriptions-and-notifications.aspx
    Regards
    sridhar v

  • VBR too high issue

    I am using OS 10.3.9 and Compressor 1.2.1
    I have a project right now that requires 3 multi-angle video tracks that are 40 mins. each.
    I made sure they are all the same identical length. Set in & out points exactly the same for each track in FCP and created my own preset within Compressor to have the same Average and Maximum Data Rates as the 120min High Quality Encode preset. I created my own preset because DVDSP says that GOP needs to be closed and the 120min Preset does not show that to be the case.
    Well after spending almost all weekend encoding video (no thanks to a slow dual 1 gig G4) and spending hours designing my DVD menus, DVDSP says that the Bit Rate is too high! That makes me feel like bashing my computer with a baseball bat! I thought I did my research and even created 30 second tests to make sure it would work.
    Does anyone have any suggestions to find out why my Bit Rate is too high? And what I can do in the future to make sure I have an acceptable bit rate so I don't waste another weekend?
    Also, is there a Compressor update I might not know about that will work with the system I use?
    Thank you for any advice.

    I was totally wrong about the video.
    The User guide is correct.
    Audio however is a different matter with multi-angle.
    The data rate of all the associated audio tracks add together.
    Here is a post from Trai Forrester on an Apple Dvdlist.
    The relevant audio details are at the end:
    From: "Trai Forrester" <email@hidden>
    Subject: RE: Multiple video streams
    Hi Pete and All,
    The multiple angle video stream, unlike multiple audio streams in a
    single track object, is interleaved. Playback of multi-angle flagged track,
    "hop scotches" on the chosen angle, "jumping over" the "not playing" chunks
    of video, "bound" within their own angle. The "about 10mbps" ceiling still
    applies.
    The 7mbps maximum limit for each separately encoded video element that
    will make up the encoded multi-angle stream, is more of a function of
    distance over time, and the inversely capable limitation of standard
    hardware to jump over non playing sections, as the non-playing sections, or
    total number of angles in the stream increase (distance to hop scotch).
    So the 9 angle stream will still register on the bit rate meter, well
    within the specs (7mbps, as the other streams aren't "playing").
    Audio streams are different. Even non-playing audio tracks bit rates
    must be included in the total.
    Example:
    9 video angles (each encoded at 7mbps) = 7mbps (only one angle can play at a
    time)
    8 Dolby stereo audio tracks @224 kbps = 1.792 mbps
    Total bit rate for the Track = 8.792 mbps - Plenty of room left to try to
    wrestle some subtitle streams out of Subtitler, and include them!
    Take care,
    Trai Forrester "Mr. DVD"
    New Constellation Technologies
    http://www.TFDVD.com
    The full discussion is at:
    http://lists.apple.com/archives/Dvdlist/2001/Dec/msg00201.html

  • Error message Translational currency is too high when posting GR for a PO

    Hi,
    I am trying to post a GR for a PO,with document currency say in GBP and local currency in EUR,when i tried to post a GR the system gives the message with-"Translational currency is too high" and also the value updated for previous GRs(for a qty 10) is vary high like 37,056,361,610.68     GBP,just i want to know how this value is picked by the system,i know exhange rate table maintained is plays important role,but the value i am getting is too high which is not at all related with rates we maintained in the table TCURR.
    I want to know why system is giving such a high value.     
    further PO quantity is 17,000 and net price is 1 GBP.
    we have posted very sucessfull GR earlier,but now this high value and error in GR  we are facing.
    with regards,

    Hi,
    Good afternoon and greetings,
    Wishing you a Happy New Year 2007
    Please go through the following OSS Note
    Note 191927 - Posting logic: GR for foreign currency PO
    Please reward points if found useful
    Thanking you
    With kindest regards
    Ramesh Padmanabhan

  • Error Rounding Difference too high when reset cleared document using FBRA

    My Client has posted cleared document with T_Code F-51. This cleared document has cleared 6040 open items.
    And now, they want to reset and reverse that cleared document.
    We found error "Rounding difference too high" when we are reset cleared document using FBRA.
    Kindly need your advice.
    Many thanks in advance.
    Regards,

    Hello,
    Please let me know the ERROR number.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • When I print business cards, they sometimes print 1/4 too high but not always.

    I have my business cards in a Word document using an Avery template. I have used the same file for years. I never had a problem with my Canon printer but after buying an HP Photosmart D110 I have had nothing but problems. When I print then they print about 1/4 inch too high ruining the cardstock and wasting ink. This doesn't happen all the time. Sometimes I print and they are perfect but when I go back and print another, the problem returns. This is the same card stock I have used for years and when it is inserted in the printer it doesn't matter if it is a single page or a stack of them. I have tried previewing the page before printing and the alignment is correct. I've tried printing to a PDF and then printing the PDF, same problem. I try it on the Canon and no problem. Only reason I bought this in the first place was the cartridges were cheaper and I do a lot of color printing and scanning!  I have just replaced the cartridges and did a head alignment so that is not the problem. I have tried it with regular paper and the problem persists. I'm ready to drop kick this thing and buy another Canon!
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Did you ever find a solution for this problem? I have no problem printing the business cards out on a Canon printer, or a different HP printer I used to have, but the D110 is nothing but a pain in the you know what !  I'm using publisher and the avery 8371 card stock,  I searched solutions for days and did everything possible but still they're not printing correctly!! I'm dissapointed in this printer, every time I have a problem with something it always seems to be an HP product!!!  Very frustrating because I never had to mess with any settings in the other printers I had, I would just put the file in, change the quality and click the print button with no problems. I'm ready to throw this printer out the window Anyway thanks in advance and I hope somebody can help me with this issue !!! 

  • I have a macbook pro OS 10.5.8. I've sync'ed it with an iPad 2. I would like to access the "cloud" but it seems my Leopard isn't sufficient. How high an OS upgrade would i need to use cloud? Most of my current apps wouldn't work with a too high upgrade.

    I have a macbook pro OS leopard 10.5.8. I've synced it with an iPad 2. I cannot access the cloud because my OS is insufficient. Problem is most of my most- used applications would not work with a too-high system upgrade. I can't afford to upgrade all my apps. I need to know: what would be the least-high system upgrade I can install in order to access the cloud on my new iPad 2? 
    MAC O.S. 10.5.8 - LEOPARD
    MacBookPro
    MacBookPro4,1
    Intel Core 2 Duo - 2.5 GHz; speed 800 MHz
    Quark Express 7.3
    Adobe Acrobat 8 Pro
    Adobe Photoshop CS 3
    Adobe Illustrator CS 3
    Adobe InDesign CS 3
    Microsoft Office 2008
    Extensis Suitcase Fusion 12.1.7
    Stuffit 12
    Thanx
    calico6

    Define "access the cloud". I can access my iCloud.com account on my 5 year old iMac at work running OS X 10.4.11 Tiger. I can download and upload Word documents and Pages documents in the iWorks section of my iCloud.com account.
    What do you want to access in "the cloud"?
    Snow Leopard would be your next system upgrade and you should be OK with the CS3 applications, and Office 2008. I cannot confirm that the other applications will work.
    This is quite old, but take a look or Google the other applications to see if they are compatible with SL.
    http://www.macintouch.com/specialreports/snowleopard/slcompat.html

  • IMac Hard Drive expectations, Are mine too high?

    Hey everyone.
    I have a 27" iMac i5. Its around 22 months old now and its being used as a personal PC at home.
    Lately, I have been experiencing HDD related issues, It hangs, load times are poor, OS takes ages to boot (windows and OSX)
    I backed up all my data to external drives and did a clean OS restore to Lion. No help, first boot with the OS was just as bad as a boot full of clutter. Loading Windows on the win partition also sometimes gives me the "cannot find OS boot disk" error which is scary.
    Anyway's doing research its all sure tell-tale signs of a failing HDD and ironically last night on my Win7 partition, I got the windows error message saying my "windows detected a hard disk problem, back up all data and contact your manufacture".
    Now, back on topic. Is this reasonable? a $2000+ computer suffering from a hardware fault like this when the HDD has never had more than 30% of the 1TB used in its life? (everything I keep backed up on externals.)
    I was honestly expecting a few more years out of this, **** even my 5 year old Macbook has never had an issue in its life and its been bagged around more places I can think of in its lifetime. How does a computer that sits on a desk suffer for a hardware failure such as this?
    From day one, I had a faulty power board inside, it caused a loud electronic buzzing noise. I did not get this fixed for aroun 9 months as tbh, it sounded normal but in the last month leading upto the replacement, it got much louder over a few days. This was replaced by Apple and I was sent on my way happy it was fixed. could this have caused something to overload?
    I am a little bit bitter which I am sure you can understand, but was my expectation of this hard drive just too high? or am I in my right to be a little upset by this?
    And before anyone askes, I was OS when my warranty ran out, my Macbook, iPad 3XiPhones and Mac Mini are all covered by their own Apple Care. the only thing that isnt is the iMac.. just my luck!
    Edit: the old link for the power board.
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2737002

    Thanks guys.
    Just got off the phone to Applecare.
    they confirmed my drive is faulty. Im just a little upset it died like this. I have never had a drive fail before. Id rather my externals go than the internal.
    Spoke to Apple, they said that he spoke to his Tech Specalist and they would not offer a free replacement. I agree is its 10 months out of warranty, but even the Apple rep I was speaking too said he would not be impressed either if it was his personal computer
    Oh well. Time to look at HDD Upgrade options! Not that I am totally impressed about it.

  • In reply to MK re: print too high...

    MichaelKazlow:in Re: print too high;
    I'm using A.Reader v.9.3.4 in  XP.3 and Officejet J4540 series; I do think you are on to something with  print preview composite showing  Zoom 94% & page set to 8.27 x  11.69" but where to change to 8.5 x 11 inches since the zoom @ 94% does  not jibe with over 11 lgth X less than 8.5 inches which would seem  logical if the 94% issue were the trouble...please expound ~ Jaye ~

    I'm not on Windows now, but the Windows dialog box is similar to the Mac Print dialog box.
    You can see under Comments there is a Page scaling dialog box. Click on the drop down menu and switch from None to Shrink to Printable Area.
    If you need to continue this discussion stay here or the original thread (at this point here might be better). Do not create yet another thread.

  • My macbook pro cpu temperature is too high??please tell me correct fact and information

    i mistake deleting my activity.......re question...
    I'm using macbook pro retina 13inch 2013 late version.
    my macbook has NO external graphic card, just iris graphic.
    when i was playing diablo3 or watching movie by using bypass ip address, my cpu temperature was maintained 90~100 celcius degrees.
    And at the same time, my cooling fan was maintained 5800~6000 rpm.
    There are two questions.
    One, is my macbook temperature too high or normal level ?
    Two, i know that 6200rpm is maximum speed of cooling fan. Why  did fan run 5800~6000rpm, not maximum?

    When processor intensive activities are taking place, temperature may reach the maximum level.
         Reset SMC.     http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3964
         Choose the method for:
        "Resetting SMC on portables with a battery you should not remove on your own".

  • Warning Message - Tracknumber of CEvLaunch too high! Help?

    Hi there
    I am attempting to import a midi file I found online into GarageBand 09 but I get the following pop up
    *Beta-only warning message - not to be localized:*
    *Tracknumber of CEvLaunch too high!*
    I'm not really too sure what this means? Does it maybe mean the volume is too high? Or there are too many tracks for Garageband to cope with?
    When I click OK a few times on the pop up it then pops up
    *Launch Event without associated track found!*
    *Changed to track 1.*
    I then have only 3 tracks for this song when I know there are many more.
    I want to be able to hear and use all of the tracks form this midi file in GarageBand 09.
    FYI when I play the midi file with Quicktime 7 it sounds fine, with all the tracks being audible.
    Can anyone help?
    Thanks!

    I have a way around this message popping up (but would still like to know why this error appears).
    I downloaded this free program
    *Midi File Editor 2.01*
    Available here
    http://mac.softpedia.com/progDownload/Midi-File-Editor-Download-71782.html
    Opened the file, and then saved it as a new name.
    Imported it to GarageBand and it worked with no errors (although the instruments are way off)
    Its a very old feeling program Midi File Editor 2.01, but hey, it worked!
    Yay!

  • Stereo audio causes "Video Bitrate too High" error

    SOS, Whizzkids.
    I try to make a build of a DVD with 1 menu and 3 tracks. , and I get an error message "Video Bitrate Too High." I check the compression setting and they're set to factory default for SD 4by3. (4 and 7 MB).
    Get this: I delete one channel of audio from each of the 3 tracks and it compiles perfectly.
    I duplicate audio channel 1 by option-dragging to channel 2 for one track, recompile and get the same error.
    I give in. Wassup?
    Any help gratefully received.

    Did you convert your audio to AC-3 (Dolby Digital)?
    If not, this is the likely cause of your problem. Run your audio through A.Pack (if using DVDSP 3 or earlier) or Compressor 2 (if using DVDSP 4). The "Dolby 2.0" presets in Compressor 2 are the Dolby Digital, but it's recommended to change the following settings and make a new preset.
    Set dialog normalization to -31 and the Compression Preset to "None". They default to -27 and "Film Standard", respectively.

Maybe you are looking for