ArchiveLink object (not DMS) for KB23N (Display Direct Activity Allocation)

Does anyone know the ArchiveLink object for KB23N for linking ArchiveLink (Scanned not SAP DMS) documents?
I can't seem to find a standard object in the object list so I thought I'd check here before attempt to create a custom ArchiveLink object for this area. There are a couple with similar names but configuring them doesn't enable the store business document option.

Hi Athol,
We have observed that for MIGO transaction,the 'Store Business Document' option is disabled.Could you please let know how this can be enabled? We have serarched the forums,no inputs.Also,there is no indicator from the configuration side as well.

Similar Messages

Time stream from resource WC not valid for total display period (PP/DS)

Hi Apo Experts,
As I enter the product view in the PERIOD TAB, this error message pops up "Time stream from resource WC not valid for total display period".
Diagnosis was "The time stream for resource WSMT200_9000_001 is not valid for the general display period. This can cause the display of the time buckets profile for this resource in the product planning table to be inaccurate."
Please, can someone help me understood what was this error mean and the cause? And maybe an idea on how to correct this.
Greatly appreciate your answer!
Thanks in advance,
Raymond

Hi Raymond,
the capacity of a resource in the live cache is generated in the past and in the future according to the settings Planning Parameters (/SAPAPO/RES01) on tab general data. Here the days- and days+ are important.
e.g. the resource has got the following parameters: days- 30 and days+ 180.
Today we have the 1th of January 2008.
After starting the product plan table you can choose the planning horizon from/to.
If the time fence is more than 180 days in the future you will get your message above because planning parameters do not "allow" more than 180 days in the future.
Instead of this the message do not appear if you choose a smaller value.
For more information please see SAP Note 449452.
Hope this helps.
Greetings
Timo

Time stream from resource not valid for total display period

Dear Friends,
In APO after PPDS Run, and executing Product View, in period tab of product view I am getting an error with following meassge.
Time stream from resource WP5_0110_001 not valid for total display period
Message no. /SAPAPO/RRP_PT055
Diagnosis
The time stream for resource WP5_0110_001 is not valid for the general display period. This can cause the display of the time buckets profile for this resource in the product planning table to be inaccurate.
Can anybody come across such type of error, if yes please let me know the possible solutions to overcome this problem.
Thanks and Regards
Nilesh

Kinldy refer to SAP Note No. 449452 for the exmplanation and solution to the issue.
Rgs - Vikas

FRM-41344 - OLE object not defined for CONTROL_OLE in the current record

Hi!
I am working in a multirecord block, and I need to obtain data from a Weighing System on each record. But this error appears in run time: FRM-41344 - OLE object not defined for CONTROL_OLE in the current record.
I use the same in other program, but in that case is a single record block.
Can somebody help me?

Hi;
For your issue i suggest close your thread here as changing thread status to answered and move it to Forum Home » Application Development in PL/SQL » Forms which is dedicated forum site
Regard
Helios

BATCHMAN-For Direct Activity Allocation

Hi,
We are using BATCHMAN to upload and external flat file of Direct Activity Allocation in SAP.
There is a limitation in BATCHMAN(T-Code) that in one file u cannot upload more than 300 records.
Can anyone help me is there any other transaction available to upload the data containing more than 300 records??
Please help. Full points will be rewarded.
Thanks
NTH

kb21n (cost center send to internal order)format:
You can go to transaction SE11, enter BAPIAAHDR and BAPIAAITM or the like in the Database table field, and click on Display.
BAPIAAHDR
CO_AREA          POSTGDATE
3001     20071128
BAPIAAITM
CO_AREA          SEND_CCTR       REC_ORDER       ACTTYPE      ACTVTY_QTY
3001     0000002001     000000400252     SAP01     1

Direct activity allocation

hi,
in KB21N, we can define allocation for cost center, prof segment, sales order or wbs.
i have few points need clarification.
1) in KO01, we also can define settlement rule for cost center. Why need to allocate using KB21N?
2) what is the difference between KB21N against allocation(assessment/distribution)?
thanks
rgds

Settlement Rule and assessment/distribution are done as part of periodic activity for moving cost from cost center/order to another cost object.
Whereas KB21N direct activity allocation is used for posting credit to the cost center based on the quantity information entered. Typically the timesheet of the labor time spent in the cost center for each activity is entered and the cost is transfered based on the same.

Direct Activity allocation posting error

Dear All,
         In T.code - KB21N I tried to run the direct activity allocation. While enter the details in KB21N all the details picked from 3xxxxxxxxx document as it is reference document. In screen variant "Order" & Input type "Individual ". Document item price has assigned xxx INR. But controlling area currency is EUR. So the system picks constant exchange rate which is maintained in total price.
        Can anyone tell where do we maintain total price per quantity for document item
Thanks...

Hi,
    We have maintained activity cost(Euro=Controlling area currency) in KP26. But the company code currency is INR. How the system picks INR value and which will be editable or not.
Thanks...

Direct Activity Allocation posting

Hi,
Is there a way to validate posting for activity type & order (order must be linked with activity type) in direct activity allocation (KB21N)?
Thank you

your question is not clear
check the link to understand the purpose of KB21n
kb21n overhead cost
Regards,
Divraj

Difference between Direct activity allocation and internal activity allocat

Hello
I am pursuing SAP Management Accounting certification
Can somebody tell me what's the difference between direct activity allocation and internal activity allocation. Please give some example and also specifications as to cost element categorry, activity type, etc.
Asif
Moderator: Please, do not post certification queries. Regarding your issue, please, refer to help.sap.com

Hi,
Activity means e.g.. sales call, customer visit etc.
But service process means after you sale your product if some service related issue arrives then that is taken care by this transaction.
Inspire by rewarding.
Regards,
Nikhil

Direct Activity Allocation-KB21N

Hi,
While i am doing the Direct Activity Allocation in KB21N,,From one cost center to another cost center...It is giving error like"CREATE MASTER DATA FOR 1101/1"
FOR UR INFORMATION :1101 IS COST CENTER
1-IS ACTIVITY TYPE
Give me the solution plzzz
REGARDS
Sap Guru

Hi,
Check whether you have created Cost center and activity type.
Aravind

BATCHMAN- Direct activity allocation

Hi,
We are using BATCHMAN to upload and external flat file of Direct Activity Allocation in SAP.
There is a limitation in BATCHMAN(T-Code) that in one file u cannot upload more than 300 records.
Can anyone help me is there any other transaction available to upload the data containing more than 300 records??
Please help. Full points will be rewarded.
Thanks
NTH

Hi
I did't found any TCODE like that. Custom program will have starting either Y or Z. If it is a custom program then with the help of ABAPer you can get the requirement.
VVR

How to get BW Objects not optmized for HANA on just migrated System from ORA to HANA?

http://www.saphana.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/1363-102-2-1810/SDN_HANA_opt_InfoCube%20FINAL.PDF
HI .....HANA Experts
We are early birds for HANA Technology !!!
The above link is showing how to convert and limitations etc.
We just migrated BW from Oracle to HANA.
Our experts converted some BW Obejcts to HANA Optimized , some still open.
Q1) In this juncture, to take the current stcok, Do we have any report which extract directly list of BW objects which are still not optimized for HANA.
Q2) How to get list of tables not yet fully loaded into Memory [or] How to get list of Infocubes & DSO's not yet fully loaded into main memeory
Q3) When we optimize objects - The size in memeory & persistance store - Size is increasing - Is it normal behaviour ?
Rgds
PR
PR Srinivas

Hi,
PR Srinivas wrote:
We just migrated BW from Oracle to HANA.
Our experts converted some BW Obejcts to HANA Optimized , some still open.
---- DSOs should not be converted. If you still want to please check RSODSO Table and check the column IMOFL (HANA Optimized setting for the DSO).
For the InfoCubes, please refer to RSDCUBE table and CUBESUBTYPE column with value F for HANA optimized setting.
Q1) In this juncture, to take the current stcok, Do we have any report which extract directly list of BW objects which are still not optimized for HANA.
Q2) How to get list of tables not yet fully loaded into Memory [or] How to get list of Infocubes & DSO's not yet fully loaded into main memeory
Please check m_cs_tables to know which tables are loaded to memory and which are not.(Refer to LOADED column).
Q3) When we optimize objects - The size in memeory & persistance store - Size is increasing - Is it normal behaviour ?
Please check the Delta memory and perform Delta Merge. Please search on SCN to get the details on the same.
Rgds
PR
PR Srinivas

Object not exported for Remote object in WSAD

Hi,
I have a few classes that extend and implement java.rmi.remote object. The JAR is placed under WEB-INF/lib of a web application.
I am using WSAD 5.1.1. When I start the server, it gives me the following error.
Can somebody make out anything?? Please help
Error Stack:
[5/3/05 12:07:04:188 IST] 3d410866 Helpers W NMSV0610I: A NamingException is being thrown from a javax.naming.Context implementation. Details follow:
Context implementation: com.ibm.ws.naming.jndicos.CNContextImpl
Context method: rebind
Context name: localhost/nodes/localhost/servers/server1
Root exception is java.rmi.NoSuchObjectException: object not exported
I tried creating the stub and the skeleton classes manually and added them to the JAR file but still I get the same error. The JAR is in the CLASSPATH of the server.
I also tried creating a simple remote object and tried binding it:
Hashtable propertiesMap = new Hashtable();
propertiesMap.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,"com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtxFactory");
propertiesMap.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, "iiop://localhost:2809" );
Context context= new InitialContext(propertiesMap);
myRemote instance = new myRemote();
context.bind("TestString",instance);
Even this gives :
javax.naming.ConfigurationException: Problem with PortableRemoteObject.toStub(); object not exported or stub not found. Root exception is java.rmi.NoSuchObjectException: object not exported
at sun.rmi.transport.ObjectTable.getStub(ObjectTable.java:115)
at java.rmi.server.RemoteObject.toStub(RemoteObject.java:88)
at com.ibm.rmi.util.JDKBridge.getJRMPStub(JDKBridge.java:129)
at com.ibm.rmi.javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject.toStub(PortableRemoteObject.java:138)
at javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject.toStub(PortableRemoteObject.java:105)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
-sam

Hi,
Not sure if this question is not clear ... Can somebody give me some hints please??
-sam

Difference between Indirect & direct activity allocation?

Hello all,
please send any information on the subject. Thanks.
Ashwini

Direct activity allocation is used when quantity is known for the work done e.g machine hours or time hours. Allocation is done via KB21n in CO.
Indirect activity allocation is used when quantity is not directly known and cost is allocated on the basis of statistical key figures e.g. number of employees.

About Direct activity allocations

When i m going for direct activety allocation in T.code KB21n,In this screen there is sender cost center ,activty type and reciving order,my sending cost center is 30100 and activites type is J00,and rec order is Consulting company A.
When i feed this data in kb21n and i save it but there is one error occured ,the error is :-
A master record for 30200/J00 exists only in 2008
Message no. KL002
Diagnosis
You want to use cost center 30200 together with activity type J00. For this combination, however, only one master data record was created in fiscal year 2008. The master record is defined in CCA during activity type planning.
Procedure
1. Create the master data record.
Activity type planning
2. Or, check your entries.
Plz guide me ITs urgent
Regards,
Pramod Kulkarni

Hi,
Check your Cost Center and Activity type master data validity (like From Period & TO Period and Fiscal Year) and KP26 planning values for Cost Center and Activity type combination values for particular period and year.
If this helps you,please assign points.
Thanks,
Rau

ArchiveLink object (not DMS) for KB23N (Display Direct Activity Allocation)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for