Archiving information from huge database

I am having some problem with the backups of a huge database (300GB), I am thinking options for backing up this database but in other place, it's a kind of DRP, but it is too complicated to move 300GB from one place to another in the network. I check tools like Shared Plex from Quest, but rigth now I'd like to know if there is an application for archiving old information. I start thinking if there is a tool for archiving the old information and if this app can put the information back in the DB?.
I only need if there are options for doing this.
Does anybody know?

whats the amount of redo per day? you can put the db in archivelog mode and backup the archivelog files! you don't need to take a full backup! well, its very difficult to decide which records to move. new records may be dependent on old records, in that case old records can not be moved or deleted!
Thanks,
G

Similar Messages

  • How to get RMAN catalog information from Target database?

    Hi,
    How to get RMAN catalog information from Target database because i don't know about catalog database? is it possible?
    Thanks

    If you run RMAN backups of a target database using a Catalog schema in another database, the target is not aware of the catalog.
    The RMAN backup script would have the connection identifier for the Catalog.
    Hemant K Chitale

  • Remove RMAN information from target database control file

    Dear Gurus,
    Can any one inform me that how I can remove RMAN related information from Target database control file without recreating the control file.
    Regards,
    asif

    I want to remove all RMAN related infromation from control file including the destination specification where backup sets were being created becuase that destination is no more available,
    configuration information also need to be removed from control file without recreating the control file.
    kindly help,
    regards,
    asif

  • Archiving Information from "old" SAP systems and switch off the server

    Good day
    I hope someone can offer some advice. Our company has a few sites across the globe. Three of the sites in South Africa ( where I'm working at the moment ) had their own SAP systems. Three odd years ago, we implementeted a new SAP system, combining the separate SAP systems into the new one, running of the same box etc etc. The "old" SAP systems were still availbale after the new one went live, in the event that people want to look back at history.
    We are you busy with a project where we are going to merge our current SAP implementation into our global SAP system... obviously only the current master data are going to be transfered to the new system. It's an idea time for us to clean up our data.
    My question: Once we go live on our global SAP system, we want to "export" or archive from the 3 "old" SAP systems the Master Data from the HR module ( like employees who's left the company - it's law to keep the records for 5 years at least once a employee has left) , HSEC and FI modules into a single datastore... this way we don't have to keep the three servers running in the event that history is required. The servers wil be kept off-line and only switched back on if a detailed audit is required.
    The global SAP system does not have an archive solution implemented to we can't access archived data from the new system...
    So, we need to export master data from our 3 old SAP boxes into a Unicode type file system, and our local South African sites needs to be able to access the information using a text type editor or a web based interface we can run off our SAP Portal...
    Thank you

    Hello Cornelius,
    To introduce myself, I am an active SDN/BPX member as well as an ASUG Archiving and Information Lifecycle Management Volunteer.
    Decommissioning Legacy Systems (SAP and non-SAP systems) is quite the topic these days with divestitures becoming such a common occurrence. 
    Some things to think about in this situation are:
    Identifying the data to be decommissioned:
    what information would be needed for an audit
    what information would be needed for a lawsuit situation
    Identifying the access requirements to this data.
    Identifying the retention policies for this data (this will be
    driven by regulatory requirements, etc.).
    If this has not already been done - define retention periods for this data - it will most likely have different retention periods based on the type of data.
    You mention that you do not have an archive solution in place yet. 
    I would recommend that you may want to research that option because typical requirements for retaining legacy data is that it is stored in such a manner so that it is protected from any type of modification.
    There are a lot of 3rd party archiving/storage solutions that provide this type of secure storage.
    You are correct in that you will want to export or archive the legacy data as opposed to loading the data into your current system.  It would probably involve a large increase in the size of your SAP database and you would probably run into number range overlaps.
    But, if this data is exported to a filesystem, you will be losing the business logic associated with the data, and the information is no longer in its original format (this could have legal ramifications). 
    I would recommend using SAP Archiving functionality for this effort.  If you are looking for outside resources, there are many vendors out there that have a lot of experience with these types of projects.
    Two that come to mind are Dolphin IT and OpenText.
    Or, depending on the timeline of your project, SAP is coming out with a tool that can be used for decommissioning SAP Systems.  It is part of
    their SAP ILM solution.  It will be called Retention Warehouse.  Here is a paragraph from their latest white paper describing this new tool:
    With the retention warehouse, SAP now offers a
    standardized method for system decommissioning in
    answer to these pressing issues. It allows you to reuse the archived data outside the original system in a central
    retention warehouse.
    For more detail on this topic, the white paper can be found on the SAP ILM Website:
    service.sap.com/ilm
    This tool is part of a larger initiative from SAP to help customers with their ILM (Information Lifecycle Management) strategy.  This tool is near and dear to me as I was fortunate enough to be part of an
    ASUG Influence Council that helped with some of the requirements for this solution.
    I hope this information is useful. 
    Good luck and Best Regards,
    Karin Tillotson

  • Archive Deleted from primary database

    Dear Experts
    I have configured physical standby database on oracle 9.2.0.1
    an archive has been deleted from primary database. and it is not applied on standby database.
    How can I synch my standby database with primary database?
    please help me out
    thanks

    Do not need configure rman. Try this.This mean is you will get all changes from primary database without logs(archivelogs becuse you loss these) then apply these to stand by.This is a best way.First change SCN from Standby database then do these.
    You can get SCN from standby as
    select min (checkpoint_change#) from v$datafile_header

  • How to retrieve information from a database View name

    For a given database View name, is there any way to retrieve what are the columns (also the corresponding table name) associated with that View?
    I am getting the view names by using DatabaseMetaData APIs.
    Now I want to retrieve the info associated with that view.
    Any help will be highly appreciated.

    If all else fails then since you have the view name then "select * from viewname where 1=0" should work.

  • Create a Slideshow that pulls information from a database

    I want to create a slideshow banner that will showcase our products. The slideshow will contain the image of the product, the name, the price, the item code and the link when someone clicks on it. Each week we update the best sellers and it can be from 5 to 15 different products. Similar to what we have now in our website www.deiequipment.com which now is static, we want to animate it and rotate the products like a slideshow.
    The problem we are encountering is that we have to manually update the slideshow content.
    We would like to know if there is a way through scripting or catalyst to connect to a database and simply update all these fields automatically. So for example if the database has 5 items, automatically will pre-fill each field listed above and the slideshow will have 5 products.
    If we update the database now with 10 products, to update automatically. That way we can create 1 slide show, the time it takes to rotate to the next product, and add simple button controls to the slide show for next and back that will simply go through the loaded items.
    I tried to do a research on how to do it online but some takes me to scripting, others to catalyst dabases, but none are specific to what I need.
    As a note, the image will just be an image holder that will be updated with the image field in the database that points to the URL location of the image.
    Any help is greatly appreciated! thanks

    Thank you for reply and assistance.
    I was doing some testing on my side regarding the size and if I do a single box rotaing ad, it will be 180 W x 220 H
    If I do the banner style it will be 540 W x 220 H that will have 3 boxes similar to this:
    Where the images will rotate right to left every 10 seconds and repeat once they have reach the last item.
    The image holders will be 100 x 125
    The fields that will change will be:
    Name - Ex. Clear, 6" Polycarbonate Bud Vases, 12 Pack
    Price - Ex. $26.28
    Brand - Ex. Cambro: BV6CW-135
    Image - URL http://www.deiequipment.com/core/media/media.nl?id=4239&c=562544&h=d2979ac8391cf36bfcb3
    I am using Flash Professional CS5, I am not too familiar with the actionscripts yet, but I have done programming in the past so I can do research on how to work with those.
    Once again, thank you for your help!

  • How can I retrieve all row information from a database table.

    I have a jsp file which calls info from columns in a table. My question, is how can I edit it so that it retrieves all the rows?
    I tried using resultset SalesInfo.next() which only retrieves the last row value and resultset SalesInfo.first() which only retrieves the first row value.
    Here is my code
    public ResultSet SalesInfo;
    public void getSalesInfo()
              try
                   Statement stmt = db.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE, ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY);
                   SalesInfo = stmt.executeQuery("SELECT sales_id,cust_id,product_id, quantity from sales;");
                   SalesInfo.first();
                   setCartsales_id (SalesInfo.getString("sales_id"));
                   setCartcust_id (SalesInfo.getString("cust_id"));
                   setCartProduct_id(SalesInfo.getString("product_id"));
                   setCartquantity (SalesInfo.getString("quantity"));
              catch(SQLException e )
                   setCartsales_id(e.toString());
                   e.printStackTrace();
    Also I apologise for not having the proper code format as I had a problem with my keyboard.

         public class SalesDB{
        public static synchronized Vector getSalesDetail(Connection connection) throws SQLException{
            String query = "SELECT * from Sales;"
           Statement statement = connection.createStatement();
            ResultSet results = statement.executeQuery(query);
            Vector sale_details = new Vector();
            while(results.next() == true){
         SaleInfo saleInfo = new    SaleInfo(results.getString("sales_id"),results.getDouble("cust_id"),results.getString("product_id"));
                sale_details.add(saleInfo);
            results.close();
            statement.close();
            return sale_details;
    }

  • Need to pass information from MS access database to another prog

    Hi,
    I really need some help here...
    I need to pass selected information from my database to another information.
    I am able to select and display the infotmation but i am not sure how i can transfer the information to the next program. Can any one please offer me some assistance?
    My code is as follow:
    /* Getting data from PSM32 and displaying it *can work* */
    import java.net.URL;
    import java.sql.*;
    import java.lang.String;
    /** Application to create a Ganttchart * */
    public class PSMdb
    public static void main (String argv[])
    //SQLQueryFormat a = new SQLQueryFormat();
    System.out.println("\nEstablishing Connection - Pls Wait... \n");
    /** Get Info fr database**/
    try
         //Connect to the database specified in the URL
         Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
         Connection con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:odbc:PSM32");
         System.out.println("Connection Established.\n");
         //Create a SELECT statement object
         Statement statmt = con.createStatement();
         //Issue the SELECT statement
         String querySt = "SELECT Set, Name, Order " +
         "FROM PMETERS " +
         "WHERE Set = 'BRAKE.BAK' ";
         //Create and execute query
         ResultSet res = statmt.executeQuery(querySt);
           while (res.next())
                String Proj = res.getString(1); //get Proj Name
              String Task = res.getString(2); //get Task Name
              //Print statement
              System.out.println("" +Proj);
              System.out.println("" +Task);
           //Close Statement and Connection
         statmt.close();
         con.close();
         System.out.println("\nConnection Closed - Operation Successful.");
         catch(Exception E)
    //Print out the Exception Error
    System.out.println("Error:" +E );
    }And yes there is another problem. I can compile and run the program in a C:\folder but when i open the document in a project workspace, i cant compile the above code. Can any one please offer me assistance?
    Thanks a million.

    To NanookOITheNorth:
    Could you provide some more relevent information
    about what the other program is and how data should
    be transferred to it? API? Socket? File?was wanted to use the "return task" thing. Issit possible to use that?
    To annie79:
    my next program is supposed to retrive the events in the "task" field and display it in a applet. After retriving the tasks i will be getting the dates to produce the gantt chart. uses the jfree lib functions.
    the code for the applet is as follow
    /* original gantt chart program that can work*/
    import java.applet.*;
    import java.awt.*;
    import javax.swing.*;
    import java.awt.event.*;
    import java.util.Calendar;
    import java.util.Date;
    import org.jfree.chart.ChartFactory;
    import org.jfree.chart.ChartPanel;
    import org.jfree.chart.JFreeChart;
    import org.jfree.data.category.IntervalCategoryDataset;
    import org.jfree.data.gantt.Task;
    import org.jfree.data.gantt.TaskSeries;
    import org.jfree.data.gantt.TaskSeriesCollection;
    import org.jfree.data.time.SimpleTimePeriod;
    /** Application to create a Ganttchart * */
    public class Ganttchart extends JApplet{
    /** @param title , frame title **/
        public void init() {
            final IntervalCategoryDataset dataset = createDataset();
            final JFreeChart chart = createChart(dataset);
            // add the chart to a panel...
            final ChartPanel chartPanel = new ChartPanel(chart);
            // this size (500, 270) here doesn't matter cos this become the html control
            // how big u wan can change in the html code the width="800" height="600"
            chartPanel.setPreferredSize(new java.awt.Dimension(500, 270));
            setContentPane(chartPanel);
         * Creates a sample dataset for a Ganttchart.
         * @return The dataset.
        public static IntervalCategoryDataset createDataset() {
         //"Task" information should be retrived from the database to replace this current 1
            /*final TaskSeries s1 = new TaskSeries("Scheduled");
            s1.add(new Task("Write Proposal",
                   new SimpleTimePeriod(date(1, Calendar.APRIL, 2001),
                                        date(5, Calendar.APRIL, 2001))));
            s1.add(new Task("Obtain Approval",
                   new SimpleTimePeriod(date(9, Calendar.APRIL, 2001),
                                        date(9, Calendar.APRIL, 2001))));
            s1.add(new Task("Requirements Analysis",
                   new SimpleTimePeriod(date(10, Calendar.APRIL, 2001),
                                        date(5, Calendar.MAY, 2001))));
            final TaskSeries s2 = new TaskSeries("Actual");
            s2.add(new Task("Write Proposal",
                   new SimpleTimePeriod(date(1, Calendar.APRIL, 2001),
                                        date(5, Calendar.APRIL, 2001))));
            s2.add(new Task("Obtain Approval",
                   new SimpleTimePeriod(date(9, Calendar.APRIL, 2001),
                                        date(9, Calendar.APRIL, 2001))));
            s2.add(new Task("Requirements Analysis",
                   new SimpleTimePeriod(date(10, Calendar.APRIL, 2001),
                                        date(15, Calendar.MAY, 2001))));*/
            final TaskSeriesCollection collection = new TaskSeriesCollection();
            collection.add(s1);
            collection.add(s2);
            return collection;
         * Utility method for creating <code>Date</code> objects.
         * @param day  the date.
         * @param month  the month.
         * @param year  the year.
         * @return a date.
        private static Date date(final int day, final int month, final int year) {
            final Calendar calendar = Calendar.getInstance();
            calendar.set(year, month, day);
            final Date result = calendar.getTime();
            return result;
         * Creates a chart.
         * @param dataset  the dataset.
         * @return The chart.
        private JFreeChart createChart(final IntervalCategoryDataset dataset) {
            final JFreeChart chart = ChartFactory.createGanttChart(
                "Ganttchart",  // chart title
                "Task",              // domain axis label
                "Date",              // range axis label
                dataset,             // data
                true,                // include legend
                true,                // tooltips
                false                // urls
    //        chart.getCategoryPlot().getDomainAxis().setMaxCategoryLabelWidthRatio(10.0f);
            return chart;   
    }As for the "run the program in a C:\folder but when i open the
    document in a project workspace, i cant compile the
    above code. Can any one please offer me assistance?"The run time error that i get is "java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: main
    Exception in thread "main" "
    Please give me some leads on how i can cont to proceed?
    Thanks a lot

  • RE: Polymorphism - retrieving type information from thedatabase or how

    Don,
    Ok but if I was to model a real restaurant, I would then have a head chef
    that can then delegate to other chefs. This head chef would have the
    additional task of coordinating the completion of subservient chefs. This
    does not and would not mean that the head chef is stuck (or partitioned) in
    one part of the kitchen. Further a head chef would most likely also be a
    chef so that he would be running around the kitchen using and interacting
    with different objects to get his part of the recipe completed. Then once
    all chefs have completed their part of the recipe the head chef could return
    the meal.
    I would also point out that it does not make sense to me to be talking about
    the chef and its ability to scale. I would look that the resource limited
    devices that must be used to prepare meals to see scalability. In this case
    the grill, the stove and the microwave. Scalability of the restaurant is a
    function of the amount of resource limited devices versus the number of
    process (i.e. chefs) that need to use those devices concurrently and the
    amount of time they require access to those devices. By talking about chefs
    as if they are the scalability limiting factor seems to bring us back to the
    notion that the chef is a manager object that is shared. And again I come
    back to the question, why?
    You may now think that in a real restaurant, there are only so many chefs so
    why not make it a shared service? Well in a real restaurant there are only
    so many of any object, but this is not a consideration in our restaurant
    model. In our "virtual" restaurant hiring a chef is as easy as:
    Chef = new;
    And of course chefs are of zero mass so there can be a whole lot in the
    kitchen. Now assuming the Grill, Stove and Microwave map to physical
    objects in our computing environment, then that is the limiting factor and
    are therefore partitioned. Whenever communication has to go through a
    single source, then scalability breaks down. I fear that too many people
    make shared objects and create communication bottlenecks where they simply
    don't exist. The only place your scalability bottlenecks should exist is in
    the actual resource limited objects of your computing environment. Simply
    said, if something isn't a resource limited object, then why is it shared?
    If anyone is not clear how to architect an application independently of the
    business model, then I would suggest looking at various framework products
    and reading some technical architecture white papers to get a different, and
    possibly enlightening, point of view.
    Mark Perreira
    Sage IT Partners.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Don Nelson [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 1998 9:04 AM
    To: Mark Perreira
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: Polymorphism - retrieving type information from the
    database
    Mark,
    First, I completely agree about the naming. I purposely used rather
    euphamistic names for these "managers", since I see many convoluted names
    for common things in various applications. But that is a topic for another
    thread...
    Simply because there is a "manager" of some type, does not imply that it is
    chained to a particular duty. However, let's look at a real life case. In
    a large restaurant, you would rarely see a chef chopping carrots or serving
    dishes to customers. Those are the responsibilities of the sous-chef and
    the waiter. So, we see that the chef does not really follow the food
    around. Why not? Because it simply doesn't scale. When scalability isn't
    a problem, (the restaurant isn't that popular, for example) the chef has
    some lattitude to accept more responsibility, and might even get involved
    with purchasing, etc.
    In the real world, the more scalable something has to be, the narrower the
    responsibilities are for each of the participating members.
    Don
    At 12:59 AM 6/17/98 -0700, Mark Perreira wrote:
    Don,
    One thing that always baffles me is when should an Object get the moniker
    "Manager." This practice seems to tell me a couple of things about these
    objects. In general when someone makes reference to a "Manager" objectthat
    it is probably a service object and probably contains no or very little
    attribution. The question is why? If I am developing an object model why
    am I thinking about such implementation issues.
    Surely if you are trying to model cooking an egg I would not see
    "SustenancePreparationManager" in your model. Using a more common term I
    would still be alarmed to see "CookManager" in your model. What does the
    CookManager manage? Does it manage other cooks or eggs. Maybe it shouldbe
    called an EggManager, but that doesn't make sense. How about just Cook.
    There that seems like the real world. And this brings me to a problem in
    the analogy. Conjuring up managers in a model can sometimes make you missa
    container. For example, I would say that if we wanted to model the real
    world, then eggs is a specialization of ingredient that is contained by
    recipe that can be given to a cook to be prepared.
    I may have many cooks (objects) that can prepare recipes and my application
    architecture not the object model needs to deal with how to best let those
    cooks utilize the grill, stove and microwave that sits on different
    partitions on my server. My cooks can move around and when they do they
    take their ability to know how to cook with them. In the real world Iwould
    expect a cook to use the right appliance to prepare the recipe based on its
    contents. I would not chain every cook to its appliance and them make me
    responsible for giving the right cook the right recipe. This is what
    managers can cause. They cause the consumer of cooks to know which cookcan
    prepare what recipes based on where they are chained. This then makes me
    know something about cooking. And if I don't know anything about cooking I
    can only image what my egg would look like if I accidentally gave therecipe
    to the cook stationed at the microwave.
    Ok Ok, I have seen many architectures use facades to hide the fact that I
    like to chain my cooks to their appliance. But what is that. I have gone
    to restaurants and I don't know what a cook facade is. If I ask themanager
    to present the cook facade manager employee I would probably be met by the
    bouncer employee.
    So what is the answer? Well for a start keep the application architecture
    out of the model. The model should stand alone in describing the
    interactions required to satisfy use cases. Second find an architecture
    that describes a more responsibility driven design and how that design and
    can map your business object behavior to a physical implementation with
    appliances and cooking rules. And lastly, don't be so quick to chain your
    cooks to their appliances. Give them some control over where they cook
    their recipes, after all that is what they do.
    Mark Perreira
    Sage IT Partners.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of Don Nelson
    Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 1998 2:07 PM
    To: Nick Willson
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: Polymorphism - retrieving type information from the
    database
    This thread is switching context a bit, but I would add one thought tothe
    idea of encapsulating behavior. One of the advantages to OO is that it
    helps us model real world behavior. In the real world, I would not askan
    invoice to stuff itself into an envelope and mail itself to its
    customer; I
    would not ask my vehicle to fuel itself or change its own oil; I wouldnot
    tell an egg carton to ask one of its eggs to fry itself. Even if these
    things were physically feasible, I could list a number of reasons why I
    still wouldn't want to do them. That is why we haveVehicleRepairManagers
    and SustenancePreparationManagers (aka, "Mechanics" and "Cooks").
    Don
    At 11:28 PM 6/15/98 -0700, Nick Willson wrote:
    Tim,
    You've had lots of good suggestions so I hope you won't mind an attempt
    at another one. The consensus seems to be for your option (1) for the
    Vehicle table, and Steve's example of a GenericConstraint (taking the
    place of your Vehicle) is probably how most people would go about
    answering your question. I don't have much to add to that, just wanted
    to offer something about where the persistence mechanism lives and how
    things look to clients that depend on it.
    Suppose for a moment you think about the Vehicle classes' persistence as
    being just one aspect of their behavior. In addition to persistence,
    you might have to implement security, or locking for concurrent access,
    or caching of vehicle objects to improve performance, and of course you
    want to calculate the vehicle tax and probably do other things with
    Vehicles too.
    You can put the persistence aspect of Vehicles into a
    PersistenceObjectManager, but then the others need somewhere too. If
    you use a bunch of Managers (one for security, one for locking...) then
    each class's behavior is scattered across these various Manager classes,
    each of which has to know about many classes. Or if you use one Manager
    class, it's going to know still more, plus you are forced to implement
    all the behavior in (or at least via) that manager's partition.
    An alternative would be to keep all the Vehicle classes' behavior
    encapsulated together, so a client always makes requests to a Vehicle,
    and the Vehicle delegates the implementation of requests to a chain of
    handler objects that hang off the vehicle object (a handler for
    security, another for persistence, and so on).
    One of the nice things about this is, the handlers can be responsible
    for going to another partition (if necessary), e.g. to perform
    persistence operations, or for more business-specific operations like
    tax calculations. And because the handlers are smart, you don't have to
    put a lot of code into service objects, the SOs can stay pretty simple.
    This isn't an approach you'll see in Express, so I hope of it's of some
    interest.
    General wrote:
    Part 1.1 Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
    Encoding: quoted-printable--
    Nick Willson
    SCAFFOLDS Consultant,
    Sage IT Partners, Inc.
    (415) 392 7243 x 373
    [email protected]
    The Leaders in Internet Enabled Enterprise Computing
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    ============================================
    Don Nelson
    Regional Consulting Manager - Rocky Mountain Region
    Forte Software, Inc.
    Denver, CO
    Phone: 303-265-7709
    Corporate voice mail: 510-986-3810
    aka: [email protected]
    ============================================
    "When you deal with higher numbers, you need higher math." - Hobbes
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >>
    >
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >
    >
    ============================================
    Don Nelson
    Regional Consulting Manager - Rocky Mountain Region
    Forte Software, Inc.
    Denver, CO
    Phone: 303-265-7709
    Corporate voice mail: 510-986-3810
    aka: [email protected]
    ============================================
    "When you deal with higher numbers, you need higher math." - Hobbes
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

    Don,
    You are absolutely correct. But this is where I honestly think you are
    missing the point. While the mail program sends the mail, my mail message
    has an interface (i.e. send button) which can delegate that to the mail
    program. This makes it nice and simple for me the consumer of the mail
    program. It also means I can think of mailing by focusing on the interface
    (i.e. the button). It would suck if every time I wanted to mail something I
    had to identify the correct pop server to send it to (i.e the MailManager).
    Mailing something is the collaboration of the setup information of the mail
    program and my mail message. If I were to model this my mail object would
    indeed have a send method that could delegate to the correct mail servers.
    This is just simplicity of interface and it is a good practice in UI
    development just as it is in business model development. A simpler
    interface, I think we can all agree, provides for a better and quicker
    understanding.
    Mark Perreira
    Sage IT Partners.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected]
    [<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of Don Nelson
    Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 9:22 AM
    To: Nick Willson
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: Polymorphism - retrieving type information from the
    database
    Nick,
    It turns out that your message does not, indeed send itself. Your mailing
    program does that.
    Don
    At 11:54 PM 6/17/98 -0700, Nick Willson wrote:
    Hey Don,
    In the real world, no, you can't tell an invoice to put itself into anenvelope
    and mail itself. You have to know about stamps and post boxes and wherethey
    are located. But isn't it nice that in software you don't have to followthe
    real world very closely if you don't want to?
    Above the top left hand corner of this message I'm typing right now, thereis a
    send button which lets me tell the message to 'stuff itself into anenvelope
    and mail itself'. Why wouldn't you want to do that?
    Don Nelson wrote:
    This thread is switching context a bit, but I would add one thought to
    the
    idea of encapsulating behavior. One of the advantages to OO is that it
    helps us model real world behavior. In the real world, I would not askan
    invoice to stuff itself into an envelope and mail itself to its customer;I
    would not ask my vehicle to fuel itself or change its own oil; I wouldnot
    tell an egg carton to ask one of its eggs to fry itself. Even if these
    things were physically feasible, I could list a number of reasons why I
    still wouldn't want to do them. That is why we haveVehicleRepairManagers
    and SustenancePreparationManagers (aka, "Mechanics" and "Cooks").
    Don
    At 11:28 PM 6/15/98 -0700, Nick Willson wrote:
    Tim,
    You've had lots of good suggestions so I hope you won't mind an attempt
    at another one. The consensus seems to be for your option (1) for the
    Vehicle table, and Steve's example of a GenericConstraint (taking the
    place of your Vehicle) is probably how most people would go about
    answering your question. I don't have much to add to that, just wanted
    to offer something about where the persistence mechanism lives and how
    things look to clients that depend on it.
    Suppose for a moment you think about the Vehicle classes' persistence as
    being just one aspect of their behavior. In addition to persistence,
    you might have to implement security, or locking for concurrent access,
    or caching of vehicle objects to improve performance, and of course you
    want to calculate the vehicle tax and probably do other things with
    Vehicles too.
    You can put the persistence aspect of Vehicles into a
    PersistenceObjectManager, but then the others need somewhere too. If
    you use a bunch of Managers (one for security, one for locking...) then
    each class's behavior is scattered across these various Manager classes,
    each of which has to know about many classes. Or if you use one Manager
    class, it's going to know still more, plus you are forced to implement
    all the behavior in (or at least via) that manager's partition.
    An alternative would be to keep all the Vehicle classes' behavior
    encapsulated together, so a client always makes requests to a Vehicle,
    and the Vehicle delegates the implementation of requests to a chain of
    handler objects that hang off the vehicle object (a handler for
    security, another for persistence, and so on).
    One of the nice things about this is, the handlers can be responsible
    for going to another partition (if necessary), e.g. to perform
    persistence operations, or for more business-specific operations like
    tax calculations. And because the handlers are smart, you don't have to
    put a lot of code into service objects, the SOs can stay pretty simple.
    This isn't an approach you'll see in Express, so I hope of it's of some
    interest.
    General wrote:
    Part 1.1 Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
    Encoding: quoted-printable--
    Nick Willson
    SCAFFOLDS Consultant,
    Sage IT Partners, Inc.
    (415) 392 7243 x 373
    [email protected]
    The Leaders in Internet Enabled Enterprise Computing
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    ============================================
    Don Nelson
    Regional Consulting Manager - Rocky Mountain Region
    Forte Software, Inc.
    Denver, CO
    Phone: 303-265-7709
    Corporate voice mail: 510-986-3810
    aka: [email protected]
    ============================================
    "When you deal with higher numbers, you need higher math." - Hobbes--
    Nick
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href="http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    >
    >
    ============================================
    Don Nelson
    Regional Consulting Manager - Rocky Mountain Region
    Forte Software, Inc.
    Denver, CO
    Phone: 303-265-7709
    Corporate voice mail: 510-986-3810
    aka: [email protected]
    ============================================
    "When you deal with higher numbers, you need higher math." - Hobbes
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
    "http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

  • Polymorphism - retrieving type information from thedatabase

     

    Daniel,
    Yes I have always thought, that modeling the real world can lead to objects
    that are unnecessary or overly complex relationships that do exist in the
    real world but may not have to in a computing environment. Many times,
    business models could be greatly simplified if the modelers factored out
    interfaces from objects so that these interfaces could be applied based on
    need of behavior without having to always construct class hierarchies in a
    particular behavioral structure. Or they could benefit greatly by applying
    design patterns to enhance delegation. But the problem with both of these
    pieces of advice is that they assume the modeler is well versed and
    understands how to apply these concepts. Many application developments I
    come across are being done by a group of people that have never used an OO
    tool before. With an audience such as this, how are they supposed to get
    started?
    Usually they will look and analyze the real-world. This will give them a
    starting point in which to conduct dialog for building an object model. I
    think I do know how these advanced strategies I described above are applied,
    yet I always ask a customer to explain the real-world example of something
    before I attempt at understanding their model and make any attempts at
    advising changes. This assures that I and they have a better physical
    understanding of an interaction before we attempt to describe an abstract
    model of the same interaction.
    As far as sharing of business objects, it is quite routine for a company to
    have one group of IT application developers create a subsystem with business
    objects that must be SHARED by another group of IT application developers.
    The different subsystems have points of interconnect. These points can be
    at the architectural level or business object level. So I don't think this
    situation is as rare as you state. Further, I can see that the marketplace
    is pushing more for run-time object sharing and collaboration so that this
    will be the norm and not the exception.
    I agree on the importance of custom routing for performance. I think it is
    complex enough that I would stop short of telling people to spend time
    building such a scheme. I would hate to see an application miss delivery
    because the developers got too entangled in technical problems like custom
    routing. But I do happen to know of a Framework product that has this as
    one of its features. :)
    I agree 100% with you the complexity of Forte is the marrying of object and
    distributed technologies. I don't agree that frameworks cannot provide the
    answer. I look at a framework as more than just a technical solution. We
    use our framework to help divide the responsibilities between Business
    Analyst, GUI Architect, Back-end Architect, GUI Developers and Back-End
    developers. At many customers, some people play all of these roles. At
    some customers, a developer may play just the GUI Developer role until he
    can come up to speed on how to build simple views that are used to build
    more complex windows. In this way, a large problem can be broken down into
    a set of much smaller problems to help the architects manage work load and
    education of the team. Without a framework that supports this sort of
    approach, the architects of the application would have to delay development
    until boundaries could be put in place. This can be very time consuming and
    cause application rewrites if the boundaries were guessed wrong. In the
    Forte marketplace today, there are products to help people set up those
    architectural boundaries. It simply is more cost effective to buy one of
    these solutions then it is to have your team spend time on this and add risk
    to your project. In other words, architecture for a Forte development can
    be bought much more cheaply than it can be created.
    Mark Perreira
    Sage IT Partners.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Daniel Nguyen [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Sunday, June 21, 1998 7:35 AM
    To: Mark Perreira
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: Polymorphism - retrieving type information from the
    database
    Mark,
    The battle question was only a little provocation : it seems that Forte
    people and yours don't have exactly the same point of view about the way
    that distribution should be made.
    The problem I see on modeling the real world is that the hypothesis
    seems to
    be wrong : the world will never be as static as the modeling in my point
    of
    view. The fact is that when you try to model real world you will add
    many
    concepts you don't really need for the application. Those concepts may
    change
    with time. In my own experience I have seen that if you don't have a
    real
    concrete objective, it is very easy to imagine many things which won't
    be
    usefull when the real aim will come. That's why I think that in a
    pragmatic
    point of view it is better (in a cost view that's right) to focus on a
    good
    modeling of the system you have to build. For instance, in an exotic
    currencies options system, you can imagine modeling for the Front a
    system
    without the product concepts, but only rules, because it is the real
    world.
    But when you come to the Back Office, you realize that all is managed
    through
    product concept. Then you come back to the Front modeling and break a
    lot
    of work. In the real world, the product concept does not exist, that's
    right.
    But it is a way to manage operations.
    We all speak about Business Objects (and rules) share and re-use. I
    imagine
    that it is only applicable on some specific domains where the concepts
    are
    already shared as Insurance, Banking or Risk management on shares. This
    is
    because we have common rules for all companies : some financial markets
    are
    organized with public rules and constraints for instance. So the
    difference
    between companies is only on the service and not really in the business
    foundations. But, in most cases, the differences between competitors are
    on their business, their know how.
    I have some difficulties to imagine companies with specific know how
    sharing
    it with competitors! So I imagine that shared business objects will be
    very poor.
    The problem may be that Business components will be provided by editors
    like
    Microsoft or may be Forte (with Express evolutions may be). But, the
    business of their clients is not in the job of those providers : they
    may
    have a wrong view of the business of their customers, because they don't
    have their know how.
    On routage capabilities of manager, I agree on the technical point of
    view.
    This should be inherited from a service definition from Forte or a
    technical
    component. But, I have seen (on financial markets) that you also need
    business
    routage for scalability and performance. This is unfortunatly not in
    Forte and
    may be not really in technical frameworks on the market. Just an example
    You have a financial market which is managed on several physical sites
    (let's
    take 2 sites). When everything is ok, you have one instance of a service
    on each
    site, first one managing some kind of instances (futures for instance)
    and the
    second one managing other kinds of instances (options for instance). But
    when the
    first site falls, you need (at run-time and if possible without stopping
    the market)
    to reconfigure the second service to manage all the instances (futures
    and options).
    So this is linked to business really. That's right, I base the
    reflection on a very
    specific (and experienced) case where the cost of the IT system is very
    low compared
    to the money exchanged on the system : you can imagine very specific
    solutions.
    The main problem I see today is that people have real difficulties to
    integrate
    object and distribution concepts and that Forte is to hard for Cobol or
    Visual
    Basic developpers. So those kinds of product should be more encapsulated
    and
    packaged on a push button way. The solution of making frameworks may be
    very
    short term solution, because of the cost and limitations about coverage
    of the
    clients specific objectives. Those problems come from Client/server
    architectures
    and needs, in my opinion, and NOT specifically from Forte or other
    competitors.
    Daniel Nguyen
    Freelance Forte Consultant
    Mark Perreira wrote:
    Daniel,
    I hope not. For SCAFFOLDS works only because of Forte and when I make
    someone a happy SCAFFOLDS customer then they are also a happy Forte
    customer. So if we sell more SCAFFOLDS, Forte sells moreForte. If there
    is a battle between us, I certainly don't understand why,because we are on
    the same team with the same goal.
    I have always found customer have a different role than you have pointed
    out. While I agree with the objectives, I have found most clients do
    actually try to model the real world. They do it because it is an easy
    starting point. They also do it because most OO books on the subject of
    modeling point people in that direction. So they do indeedplay the role of
    God with the business object model. But I have found thesesame customers
    unwilling to play the role of God with the architecture. Theyare either
    new to Forte and distributed object systems or they feelcomfortable with
    the architecture to be documented and supported beyond thetenure of a set
    of consultants that could come in and build such a system. In this case
    they buy a pre-defined and built architecture.
    I also agree that a Forte Service Object in and of itself can be
    problematic. But I depart where you say a manager can dothings like custom
    routing. This is exactly why I think Forte can be too difficult for too
    many people. Any custom routing scheme is not to be takenlightly in its
    impact of the overall performance and makeup of a running system. The
    manager pattern does not describe a run-time environment withthe checks and
    balances needed to make sure a custom router can perform. I have talked
    with you Daniel and have complete faith in your ability todevelop such a
    system. I would be very concerned in having just anyone try toimplement
    custom routing in manager objects without a run-time environment that
    simplifies and protects the participants from the mountain of technical
    problems that would follow.
    Mark Perreira
    Sage IT Partners.
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

  • RE: Polymorphism - retrieving type information from thedatabase

    I would disagree with your statement that either the object or data model
    must be wrong. The problem is more fundamental-trying to store objects in a
    relational database. The object and relational paradigms can be made to
    work together, but usually only by compromising tenets of one or the other
    (or both). Now granted, there are many ways of making them work
    together-and some are definitely better than others.
    CJ
    Chris Johnson
    612-594-2535 (direct)
    612-510-4077 (pager)
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Rottier, Pascal [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday, June 15, 1998 8:17 AM
    To: Forte Users Mailing list
    Subject: RE: Polymorphism - retrieving type information from
    the database
    > ----------
    > From: Rottier, Pascal[SMTP:[email protected]]
    > Sent: Monday, June 15, 1998 8:17:16 AM
    > To: Forte Users Mailing list
    > Subject: RE: Polymorphism - retrieving type information from
    the database
    > Auto forwarded by a Rule
    >
    This issue has already passed this mailing list a couple of
    times in the past. To put it in more general terms, you have
    different classes which you store in the same DB table.
    This is always tricky. Nine out of ten times, this means
    either your Object model or your DataBase model is wrong.
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    This issue has already passed this mailing list a couple of
    times in the past. To put it in more general terms, you have
    different classes which you store in the same DB table.
    This is always tricky. Nine out of ten times, this means
    either your Object model or your DataBase model is wrong.
    If you can differentiate between different classes, this
    means you're dealing with different entities, which should
    be stored in different tables. What if one class has an
    attribute the other one doesn't. This would mean you have
    to add a column to the database which is filled it the row
    represends one class and is NULL if the row represends
    another class. This is not good database practice!
    Differentiating between different classes by means of
    a "type" attribute is the classic procedural approach.
    The OO approach would be to create subclasses. How-
    ever, a relational database doesn't support subclasses.
    The best way, would be to have a different table for
    each subclass. If this gives you problems with norma-
    lizing your database, you can create a table with all
    the attributes generic to vehicle, and a table for each
    subclass with only the attributes relevant to this sub-
    class and a foreign key relation to the main table. If all
    of this is not feasable, you're left with the need to find
    some mechanism to identify what kind of class a cer-
    tain row represends and then instantiate this class. The
    tree solutions you suggested all work. It doesn't really
    matter which one you chose, they're all equally dirty.
    Hope this helps,
    Pascal.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: General [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Monday 15 June 1998 12:20
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Polymorphism - retrieving type information from the
    database
    Suppose I have a class structure containing one base class with
    several specialisations. Say, "Vehicle", with specialisations of
    "Car", "Van" and "Truck". All vehicles are persisted in the database,
    in a rolled-up table, and I want a generic retrieval mechanism, which
    fetches a vehicle based on the license plate number. (It will probably
    be a service object, which I will call a Persistent Object Manager).
    I wish to retrieve ALL vehicles, and calculate the road tax for each.
    However, cars, vans and trucks are all subject to different tax rules,
    and require a different method to calculate their road tax. To put it
    another way, there is a polymorphic method 'CalculateRoadTax' on the
    "Vehicle" class.
    Q: As each vehicle is extracted from the database, how does the rest
    of the Forte application know what type of vehicle it is?
    I am sure that others must have solved this problem before, but it is
    new to us. We have come up with the following solutions:
    (1)  Add a "sub-type" column to the "Vehicle" table. Use the type
    information to instantiate a Forte object of the correct type
    (2)  Maintain a completely separate table linking the vehicle licence
    plate to its sub-type.
    (3)  Deduce the type of the object from the pattern of null columns in
    the row.
    I think (1) is the best solution, but I'm interested to know what the
    experts say!
    Incidentally, if Express can help or hinder in this situation, I would
    be interested in that as well.
    regards,
    Tim Kimber
    EDS (UK)
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

  • Displaying information from Numbers in iWeb

    Is there a way to display information from Numbers in iWeb? I am trying to create a FSBO site, and I imagine a scenario where I have all the houses from a table in Numbers listed with hyperlinks to their respective web pages.
    If this is not a good possibility, anyone know of another technology to get this done?
    Thanks,
    Phil

    i've got an application, written in C++ which gets some information from oracle database (...) i write some information to xml file and i want to display in my browser using APEX/Application Builder.
    So i wrote application in java that retrieves information from xml file and now i want to display to it in web browser using APEXIf the information you want to display is already in an Oracle database, you can just use Apex to retrieve and display the information.
    Instead of this:
    Oracle database --> C++ program --> XML file --> Java program --> ??? --> web browserJust do this:
    Oracle database --> Apex --> web browser- Morten
    http://ora-00001.blogspot.com

  • Need information on accessing database tables in small incremental chunks

    I've been building up a database of information for sometime now. I want to start moving some of the information from the database into other formats.
    The table is quite large and I want to use cached row sets with it rather than hold the connection to the database. So I want to learn what the best way would be to grab, for instance, the first 50 items in a cached row set, once they're complete, move onto the next 50 and so on.
    However I am fairly new at using Java to interact with databases. I'm not sure what the best way to go about this would be or if I'm even going down the right path by using cached row sets.
    Could anyone recommend some decent sites for achieving this or even good web sites for general database manipulation with Java?

    ToadWarrior wrote:
    I've been building up a database of information for sometime now. I want to start moving some of the information from the database into other formats.
    The table is quite large and I want to use cached row sets with it rather than hold the connection to the database. So I want to learn what the best way would be to grab, for instance, the first 50 items in a cached row set, once they're complete, move onto the next 50 and so on.
    However I am fairly new at using Java to interact with databases. I'm not sure what the best way to go about this would be or if I'm even going down the right path by using cached row sets.
    Could anyone recommend some decent sites for achieving this or even good web sites for general database manipulation with Java?I am working on a data mining project and I have been dealing with storing large data sets in to a data model, and then arrange those data sets in different formats. If you can live without the cached row set, I would recommend define methods of ResultsSet type and use that to retrieve data from the database and store it in csv file. In my data mining project I was dealing with 3.5+million large data set, chomp them into different chunks of data sets.
    Since you have mention that you want to import these data into other formats, I would recommend this option since CSV files can be used in any kind of software applications with out minimum effort.
    I am currently hosting the project on Google Code so let me know if you like to take a look at it.
    Good Luck,
    Anuradha Uduwage

  • Remove RMAN information from target control file

    Dear Gurus,
    Can any one inform me that how I can remove RMAN related information from Target database control file.
    Regards,
    asif

    Recreate the Controlfile.
    1. Generate the script with "ALTER DATABASE BACKUP CONTROLFILE TO TRACE;"
    2. Shutdown the database
    3. Obtain the script from the tracefile in user_dump_dest
    4. Run the CREATE CONTROLFILE portion of the script
    Note : Oracle generally advices a Cold Backup before doing a CREATE CONTROLFILE. If you edit the script and inadvertently miss one or more datafiles from the CREATE command, those datafiles would no longer belong to the database and you wouldn't be able to "add" them back -- you'd have to RESTORE the controlfiles and database.
    Recreating the Controlfile clears all information about recent backups from the controlfile. So this is not a step to be taken lightly. If you do this and, later, need to do a Restore/Recover operation, RMAN wouldn't find information. But that, based on a reading of your question, seems to be what you DO want to do.
    Hemant K Chitale
    http://hemantoracledba.blogspot.com

Maybe you are looking for

  • Reporting Error After Upgrading to SCCM 2012 R2

    After upgrading from SCCM 2012 SP1 CU2 to SCCM 2012 R2, some users receive an error whenever they open a report.  This occurs in both the SCCM console and the SSRS web site.  What's odd is not all users receive the error.  In fact, for two users with

  • Sync Mediator calling Async BPEL

    Hi, I have an Synchronous mediator which will invoke an Async BPEL. Aync BPEL will do some processing and need to send the response back to the mediator which is not happening. Any ideas on how to get the response from the Async BPEL pass on to the S

  • How to i get my contacts back

    i restored my ipod touch and lost my contacts how do i get them back

  • RSUM : how to reset the sum ?

    Hello, I created a colum, based on the following formula : RSUM(sales), that I want to compare to another colums : RSUM(Target). Then, I want to compare the values and their evolutions month by month. Therefore, I display the following data : - Compa

  • How can I do "2PC"  WLS6.0 + oracle 8.1.6 (thin driver )