Are Oracle-Validated patches available in OEL 6?????????????

I have a plan to install OEL 6 and Oracle EBS R12 in my Server. But I need to make sure all Oracle-validated patches available in OEL 6 & I can install EBS R12 in OEL 6 properly....I had seen a mail in OTN which mentioned there is no RPMs available for OEL6 till now....
Please tell me a good Suggestion.
Arun Kurungatt

user13680387 wrote:
I have a plan to install OEL 6 and Oracle EBS R12 in my Server. But I need to make sure all Oracle-validated patches available in OEL 6 & I can install EBS R12 in OEL 6 properly....I had seen a mail in OTN which mentioned there is no RPMs available for OEL6 till now....
Please tell me a good Suggestion. OEL6 is not yet certified with Oracle Apps 11i/R12
Please refer to these docs for the list of certified Linux OS.
Oracle E-Business Suite Installation and Upgrade Notes Release 12 (12.1.1) for Linux x86 [ID 761564.1]
Oracle E-Business Suite Installation and Upgrade Notes Release 12 (12.1.1) for Linux x86-64 [ID 761566.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Similar Messages

  • Oracle-Validated RPM install on OEL 4.5 x64

    I've had problems trying to install the Oracle-Validated RPM on OEL 4.5 x64. Up2Date would hang. Anyone else try using the RPM on OEL 4.5?

    Sergio,
    I reran the commands today and they work fine. It must have been a glitch in the network. Thanks.
    Any word on the update of the RPM for OEL 5.0? Is this going to be released to the Open Source or is this specific for OEL? I wanted to start using this on RHEL and Centos.

  • Are there any patches available for Dev 21

    Hi,
    We've been working with Forms50 and Reports 25 under win95 for
    quite a while and have noticed occasional problems:
    - A program abort due to page fault protection under win95.For
    example, R30DES32 : R30LIB.dll.
    - You issue compile all and get and error that forms is not
    able to go to (goto error button).
    - A compile error that requires login in and out and
    recompile to fix.
    I wonder if
    - there are any patches available for Dev 21,
    - i have a memory shortage problem,
    - these are (especially case 1) win95 problems.
    Please help will be welcomed ................!
    null

    Where can I find them?
    thanks in advance,
    Xiaolin
    Jason Judge (guest) wrote:
    : There are patches for the 32bit v2.1 Windows environments
    dated:
    : 24 June 98
    : 5 August 98
    : 16 September 98
    : 21 Octomer 98
    : 21 February 99
    : and I believe a new one is just out.
    : Take your pick!
    : JJ
    : Luis Medina (guest) wrote:
    : : Hi,
    : : We've been working with Forms50 and Reports 25 under win95
    for
    : : quite a while and have noticed occasional problems:
    : : - A program abort due to page fault protection under
    : win95.For
    : : example, R30DES32 : R30LIB.dll.
    : : - You issue compile all and get and error that forms is not
    : : able to go to (goto error button).
    : : - A compile error that requires login in and out and
    : : recompile to fix.
    : : I wonder if
    : : - there are any patches available for Dev 21,
    : : - i have a memory shortage problem,
    : : - these are (especially case 1) win95 problems.
    : : Please help will be welcomed ................!
    null

  • Availability of oracle-validated rpm for el5 (2.6.18-8.el5)

    Is the Oracle validated rpm available for el5 (Oracle Enterprise Linux 2.6.18-8.el5) . It only seems to be available for el4. We do have ULN support.

    Hi,
    Oracle-Validated is an optional way to satisfy the pre-install requirements for customers signed up with Unbreakable Linux support.
    This packages main function as following:
    1,Checks whether the required packages are present, and if some of them are not, installs them automatically resolving the dependencies.
    2,updates the paramaters in the system files ( /etc/sysctl.conf, /etc/security/limits.conf, /etc/modprobe.conf, /boot/grub/grub.conf ) according to recommendations derived from the Validated Configuration specifications.
    3,Creates dba and oinstall groups, and Oracle user if they are not present. If an oracle user is present before rpm install, no changes are done to that groups and user.
    The developer are going to create links for downloading of oracle-validated.rpm on all or one of the following pages: http://linux.oracle.com, http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/index.html, http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/linux/index.html.So far,it hasn't got yet.
    Regards
    Terry

  • Yum installs of oracle-validated (x86_64, OEL 5.1)

    We're seeing an issue w/ yum installs of the oracle-validated package. It doesn't add in the correct glibc-devel package on x86_64. We have to add that to the install line explicitly for things to work.
    Anyone else seeing this?
    (Yes, yum. Not up2date. We're downloading the full repo for base, and for patch, via repo_populate from ULN. )

    What version of the oracle-validated package?
    What version of glibc do you have?
    What version of glibc do you need?
    Packages updated after the media packaging are available only under with an Unbreakable Linux Network subscription.

  • ULN oracle-validated, Note 761566.1 and database packages for OEL 5.5

    I purchased the ULN to simiplify installing the packages for an Oracle E-Business installation. I'm assuming the oracle-validated is not for E-Business installation because there were several required packages from note 761566.1 that were not installed The note also has a list of 11.1.0.7 required packages. Not all of these were installed with the oracle-validated update either. Maybe i'm not doing it correctly?
    If so, how do you use the oracle-validated to apply all the required packages. What channels do I subscribe to for the oracle-validated to work correctly.
    I am on OEL 5.5
    I am subscribed to two channels the latest for 5.5 and 5.5 x64 per a previous thread.
    Packages listed in note 761566.1 that I'm having trouble with:
    There are 3 parts to the package installation section.
    1. You have to go to http://oss.oracle.com/projects/compat-oracle/files/Enterprise_Linux to get a couple packages not on the OEL installation disk. Are these also on the ULN update someplace?
    •openmotif21-2.1.30-11.EL5.i3861
    •xorg-x11-libs-compat-6.8.2-1.EL.33.0.1.i386
    2. A list of packages for release 5 and up
    There were more than this not updated from oracle-validated from the ULN but these are the trouble ones:
    This is on the list of required:
    •glibc-2.5-18.i686 (32-bit)
    •glibc-2.5-18.x86_64
    •glibc-common-2.5-18.x86_64
    •glibc-devel-2.5-18.i386 (32-bit)
    •glibc-devel-2.5-18.x86_64
    This is what is on the server after ULN update
    glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i686)
    glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (x86_64)
    glibc-common-2.5-49 (x86_64)
    glibc-devel-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i386)
    glibc-headers-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i386)
    Is glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i686) a newer version of •glibc-2.5-18.i686 (32-bit) ? if so, then where do I get the same version that is synonymous with •glibc-devel-2.5-18.x86_64 ?
    If i try to apply •glibc-devel-2.5-18.x86_64 I get stuck in a loop.
    This is what is on the 5.5 linux disk:.
    glibc-2.5-49.i686.rpm
    glibc-devel-2.5-49.i386.rpm
    glibc-2.5-49.x86_64.rpm
    glibc-common-2.5-49.x86_64.rpm
    glibc-devel-2.5-49.x86_64.rpm
    glibc-utils-2.5-49.x86_64.rpm
    glibc-headers-2.5-49.x86_64.rpm
    3. Additionally, the following RPMs are required for an 11gR1
    I would have thought at least these packages would have installed from the oracle-validated update, but they weren't. Maybe I'm doing it wrong.
    The following are listed in the note to be installed: I get stuck in a loop with this one too. What do I do about this?
    •elfutils-libelf-devel-0.125-3.el5.x86_64
    •elfutils-libelf-devel-static-0.125-3.el5.x86_64
    What is installed is
    elfutils-libelf-devel-0.137-3.el5 (i386)
    elfutils-libelf-devel-static-0.137-3.el5 (i386)
    # rpm -ivh elfutils-libelf-devel-0.137-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
    error: Failed dependencies:
    elfutils-libelf-devel-static-x86_64 = 0.137-3.el5 is needed by elfutils-libelf-devel-0.137-3.el5.x86_64
    # rpm -ivh elfutils-libelf-devel-static-0.137-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
    error: Failed dependencies:
    elfutils-libelf-devel-x86_64 = 0.137-3.el5 is needed by elfutils-libelf-devel-static-0.137-3.el5.x86_6
    This is what is on the 5.5 disk:
    elfutils-libelf-devel-0.137-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
    elfutils-libelf-devel-static-0.137-3.el5.i386.rpm
    elfutils-libelf-0.137-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
    elfutils-libelf-devel-0.137-3.el5.i386.rpm
    elfutils-libelf-0.137-3.el5.i386.rpm
    elfutils-libelf-devel-static-0.137-3.el5.x86_64.rpm
    Edited by: jarymo on Jan 28, 2011 7:29 AM

    Now I really need glibc-devel-2.5-18.x86_64. My installation failed with the following which is what started this quest for what is missing in the first place.
    .end std out.
    sqlplus: error while loading shared libraries: libclntsh.so.11.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    egrep: /u01/oracle/VIS/db/tech_st/11.1.0/appsutil/log/VIS_vicr410/adcrdb_VIS.txt: No such file or directory
    This failed on the database portion of the installation. ibclntsh.so.11.1 sh
    From DOC: 786995.1 Troubleshooting The Relink Errors When Missing RPMs on Linux x86-64
    Error :-
    /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a
    collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
    genclntsh: Failed to link libclntsh.so.11.1
    Affected Version :-
    11.1 RHEL5(x86-64)
    RPM missing :-
    glibc-devel (64-bit)
    ApplyDatabase_01281418.log
    This is on the list of required:
    •glibc-2.5-18.i686 (32-bit)
    •glibc-2.5-18.x86_64
    •glibc-common-2.5-18.x86_64
    •glibc-devel-2.5-18.i386 (32-bit)
    •glibc-devel-2.5-18.x86_64
    This is what is on the server after ULN update
    glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i686)
    glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (x86_64)
    glibc-common-2.5-49 (x86_64)
    glibc-devel-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i386)
    glibc-headers-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i386)
    Is glibc-2.5-49.el5_5.7 (i686) a newer version of •glibc-2.5-18.i686 (32-bit) ? if so, then where do I get the same version that is synonymous with •glibc-devel-2.5-18.x86_64 so I don't have to remove all the UNL updates and apply what is on the installation disk?

  • After enabling Oracle Deport Repair, What are the recommended patches to be applied for R12 instance.

    Hi,
    I'm working on Oracle Deport Repair, so are they any Recommended patches to be applied on the Instance to complete the Implementation successful.
    Please let me know if they are any patches available.
    Thank you.

    Please see ..
    Identifying Recommended Patches for E-Business Suite Environments
    https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/recommended_patches_for_oracle_e
    Identifying the Latest Family Packs for Oracle E-Business Suite
    https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/latest_available_packs_for_oracle
    Oracle Applications Current Patchset Comparison Utility - patchsets.sh [ID 139684.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Is there any patch available so i can use it in Oracle 9i Standard Edition

    Incremental Backup and Recovery
    Parallel DML
    Parallel Query
    Export/import Transportable Tablespace
    these features are supported by Oracle 9i Enterprise Edition but not in Oracle 9i Standard Edition
    is there any patch available so i can use it in Oracle 9i Standard Edition

    A DVD is essentially a standard definition image (DV)
    So, if you are not adding titles or compositing, simple DV/NTSC (or DV/PAL) will work.
    If you are doing compositing, ProRes LT for standard definition would be the way to go.
    x

  • OEL 5.8 Oracle Validated Install

    I'm trying to setup Oracle Database on an Oracle Minimal stripped down install of linux 5.8 64-bit where internt access seems blocked. Since it lacks internet access, I managed a work around by setting up a local yum repository from the OEL 5.8 Install disc rpm(MOS ID: 579101.1). now before i run a localinstall of oracle-validated package, I need to have glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386.rpm and glibc-devel-2.5-81.x86_64.rpm packages installed. These packaged throw me dependency errors. Seems like almost every package the Oracle Database needs this libraries so theres no work to skip these. However ever dependent package i try to install throws dependency errors. I've tried installing all of them together. That doesn't work either.
    yum localinstall glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386.rpm
    Loaded plugins: rhnplugin
    There was an error parsing the ULN proxy settings.
    ULN support will be disabled.
    Setting up Local Package Process
    Examining glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386.rpm: glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386
    Marking glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386.rpm to be installed
    Excluding Packages in global exclude list
    Finished
    Resolving Dependencies
    --> Running transaction check
    ---> Package glibc-devel.i386 0:2.5-81 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 for package: glibc-devel
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers = 2.5-81 for package: glibc-devel
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers for package: glibc-devel
    --> Running transaction check
    ---> Package glibc-devel.i386 0:2.5-81 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 for package: glibc-devel
    ---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.5-81 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 for package: glibc-headers
    --> Processing Dependency: kernel-headers >= 2.2.1 for package: glibc-headers
    --> Processing Dependency: kernel-headers for package: glibc-headers
    --> Running transaction check
    ---> Package glibc-devel.i386 0:2.5-81 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 for package: glibc-devel
    ---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.5-81 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 for package: glibc-headers
    ---> Package kernel-headers.x86_64 0:2.6.18-308.0.0.0.1.el5 set to be updated
    --> Finished Dependency Resolution
    glibc-headers-2.5-81.x86_64 from local has depsolving problems
    --> Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 is needed by package glibc-headers-2.5-81.x86_64 (local)
    glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386 from /glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386 has depsolving problems
    --> Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 is needed by package glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386 (/glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386)
    Error: Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 is needed by package glibc-headers-2.5-81.x86_64 (local)
    Error: Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 is needed by package glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386 (/glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386)
    You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
    You could try running: package-cleanup --problems
    package-cleanup --dupes
    rpm -Va nofiles nodigest
    The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils package.
    while a
    rpm -qa|grep glibc lists
    glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.7
    glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.7
    Please advice.

    Ram Chaitanya wrote:
    I'm trying to setup Oracle Database on an Oracle Minimal stripped down install of linux 5.8 64-bit where internt access seems blocked. Since it lacks internet access, I managed a work around by setting up a local yum repository from the OEL 5.8 Install disc rpm(MOS ID: 579101.1). now before i run a localinstall of oracle-validated package, I need to have glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386.rpm and glibc-devel-2.5-81.x86_64.rpm packages installed. These packaged throw me dependency errors. Seems like almost every package the Oracle Database needs this libraries so theres no work to skip these. However ever dependent package i try to install throws dependency errors. I've tried installing all of them together. That doesn't work either.
    yum localinstall glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386.rpm
    Loaded plugins: rhnplugin
    There was an error parsing the ULN proxy settings.
    ULN support will be disabled.
    Setting up Local Package Process
    Examining glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386.rpm: glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386
    Marking glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386.rpm to be installed
    Excluding Packages in global exclude list
    Finished
    Resolving Dependencies
    --> Running transaction check
    ---> Package glibc-devel.i386 0:2.5-81 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 for package: glibc-devel
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers = 2.5-81 for package: glibc-devel
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers for package: glibc-devel
    --> Running transaction check
    ---> Package glibc-devel.i386 0:2.5-81 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 for package: glibc-devel
    ---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.5-81 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 for package: glibc-headers
    --> Processing Dependency: kernel-headers >= 2.2.1 for package: glibc-headers
    --> Processing Dependency: kernel-headers for package: glibc-headers
    --> Running transaction check
    ---> Package glibc-devel.i386 0:2.5-81 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 for package: glibc-devel
    ---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.5-81 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 for package: glibc-headers
    ---> Package kernel-headers.x86_64 0:2.6.18-308.0.0.0.1.el5 set to be updated
    --> Finished Dependency Resolution
    glibc-headers-2.5-81.x86_64 from local has depsolving problems
    --> Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 is needed by package glibc-headers-2.5-81.x86_64 (local)
    glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386 from /glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386 has depsolving problems
    --> Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 is needed by package glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386 (/glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386)
    Error: Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 is needed by package glibc-headers-2.5-81.x86_64 (local)
    Error: Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-81 is needed by package glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386 (/glibc-devel-2.5-81.i386)
    You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
    You could try running: package-cleanup --problems
    package-cleanup --dupes
    rpm -Va nofiles nodigest
    The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils package.
    while a
    rpm -qa|grep glibc lists
    glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.7
    glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.7
    Please advice." internt access seems blocked."
    I'd be solving that problem first.

  • Oracle validated package is not available for OEL5

    Oracle validated package is not available for OEL5 yet. Does anyone know when it will be available?
    Available now:
    oracle-validated-1.0.0-3.el4.i386     Oracle Software for Enterprise Linux 4 (i386)
    oracle-validated-1.0.0-3.el4.x86_64     Oracle Software for Enterprise Linux 4 (x86_64)
    oracle-validated-1.0.0-4.el4.i386     Oracle Software for Enterprise Linux 4 (i386)
    oracle-validated-1.0.0-4.el4.x86_64     Oracle Software for Enterprise Linux 4 (x86_64)

    Looking forward to the release. Will the release also include updates for 11g readiness and validation?

  • Import oracle.apps.fnd.framework.OAViewObject; are not valid.

    Hi,
    The requirement is to limit the results of a query of a search page(iprocurement --> Requisitions)by adding a hard coded condition to  a where clause(CREATED_BY LIKE ('%LUMWANA%')).
    The limitation,I have is that I am allowed to extend only the controller.So I can not write a service method in application module and append to the where clause.
    The OAF developer's guide suggests that the only import from model I can have in controller is OAApplicationModule.
    Imports like import oracle.apps.fnd.framework.OAViewObject; are not valid.
    So I can not get the ViewObject in the controller and add new viewcriteria to it.
    What are the options that I have with this requirement.Are there any options to get the default view criteria from OAQueryBean and add additional criteria rows to it on page load/On press of GO button in the controller itself.

    hi,
    In your Controller try the below:
    import oracle.apps.fnd.framework.OAViewObject;
    OAApplicationModule am = (OAApplicationModule)pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
    //String s1 = (String)oapagecontext.getTransactionValue("VoName");  ---you can try it if the below one will not work
    OAViewObject cusVO= (OAViewObject)am.findViewObject(VOName);
    cusVO.setWhereClause(null);
          cusVO.setWhereClauseParams(null);
          cusVO.setWhereClause("REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = :1");
          cusVO.setWhereClauseParam(0, reqNum);               
          cusVO.setMaxFetchSize(-1);
          cusVO.executeQuery();
    For more info, refer the below link:
    https://forums.oracle.com/thread/620451?start=0&tstart=0
    Regards
    Mahesh

  • OEL 56 and Oracle validated rpm server will not reboot.

    [root@stage-rac21 admin]# up2date -i oracle-validated
    Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: ol5_x86_64_latest...
    Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: el5_x86_64_oracle...
    Fetching rpm headers...
    Name Version Rel
    oracle-validated 1.1.0 7.el5 x86
    Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...
    kernel-uek-2.6.32-100.28.9. ########################## Done.
    kernel-uek-firmware-2.6.32- ########################## Done.
    kexec-tools-1.102pre-126.0. ########################## Done.
    oracle-validated-1.1.0-7.el ########################## Done.
    ql2xxx-firmware-1.01.01-0.2 ########################## Done.
    busybox-1.2.0-7.el5.x86_64. ########################## Done.
    Preparing ########################################### [100%]
    Installing...
    1:busybox ########################################### [100
    2:kexec-tools ########################################### [100
    3:ql2xxx-firmware ########################################### [100
    4:kernel-uek-firmware ########################################### [100
    5:kernel-uek ########################################### [100
    6:oracle-validated ########################################### [100
    The following packages were added to your selection to satisfy dependencies:
    Name Version Release
    kernel-uek 2.6.32 100.28.9.el5
    kernel-uek-firmware 2.6.32 100.28.9.el5
    kexec-tools 1.102pre 126.0.1.el5_6.5
    ql2xxx-firmware 1.01.01 0.2.el5
    busybox 1.2.0 7.el5
    Reboot and will not come up.
    KVM shows:
    mount: could not find filesystem '/dev/root'
    setuproot: moving /dev failed: No such file or directory
    no fstab.sys, mounting internal defaults
    setuproot: error mounting /proc: No such file or directory
    switchroot: mount failed : No such file or directory
    Kernel Panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
    Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.32-100.28.9.el5 #1
    Call Trace:
    Is anyone else having trouble with 2.6.32-100.28.9.el5?

    One of our sys admins has some input on this. Starting to make sense.
    Looks like maybe this kernel is missing the device mapper info.
    *.203 + *.205:
    Now regarding the issue with this and the *.205 server post kernel
    updates + reboot (kernel panic due to the system not being able to load
    /), I think this was due to some needed device mapper modules being
    missing from the initrd of the new kernel (see below for the details).
    As per lenny, I've updated the grub configs on *.205 to load the old
    kernel (default=1 in /boot/grub/grub.conf; the system was restored by
    booting back to the previous kernel) for now:
    [root@stage-rac22 ~]# mkdir /tmp/initrd_diff
    [root@stage-rac22 ~]# cp -v /boot/initrd-2.6.32-100.28.9.el5.img
    /boot/initrd-2.6.18-238.5.1.0.1.el5.img /tmp/initrd_diff/
    `/boot/initrd-2.6.32-100.28.9.el5.img' ->
    `/tmp/initrd_diff/initrd-2.6.32-100.28.9.el5.img'
    `/boot/initrd-2.6.18-238.5.1.0.1.el5.img' ->
    `/tmp/initrd_diff/initrd-2.6.18-238.5.1.0.1.el5.img'
    [root@stage-rac22 ~]# chmod -v go+r /tmp/initrd_diff/*
    mode of `/tmp/initrd_diff/initrd-2.6.18-238.5.1.0.1.el5.img' changed to
    0644 (rw-r--r--)
    mode of `/tmp/initrd_diff/initrd-2.6.32-100.28.9.el5.img' changed to
    0644 (rw-r--r--)
    [root@stage-rac22 ~]# chown -vR admin. /tmp/initrd_diff/
    [root@stage-rac22 ~]# su - admin
    [admin@stage-rac22 ~]$ cd /tmp/initrd_diff/
    [admin@stage-rac22 initrd_diff]$ mkdir -v old new
    mkdir: created directory `old'
    mkdir: created directory `new'
    [admin@stage-rac22 initrd_diff]$ (cd old/; zcat
    ../initrd-2.6.18-238.5.1.0.1.el5.img|cpio -idv)
    [admin@stage-rac22 initrd_diff]$ (cd new/; zcat
    /tmp/initrd-2.6.32-100.28.9.el5.img|cpio -idv)
    [admin@stage-rac22 initrd_diff]$ diff -qr old/ new/
    diff: old/dev/ram: No such file or directory
    diff: new/dev/ram: No such file or directory
    Files old/init and new/init differ
    Files old/lib/cciss.ko and new/lib/cciss.ko differ
    Only in old/lib: dm-log.ko
    Only in old/lib: dm-mem-cache.ko
    Only in old/lib: dm-message.ko
    Only in old/lib: dm-mirror.ko
    Only in old/lib: dm-mod.ko
    Only in old/lib: dm-raid45.ko
    Only in old/lib: dm-region_hash.ko
    Only in old/lib: dm-snapshot.ko
    Only in old/lib: dm-zero.ko
    Files old/lib/ehci-hcd.ko and new/lib/ehci-hcd.ko differ
    Only in old/lib: ext3.ko
    Only in old/lib: jbd.ko
    Files old/lib/ohci-hcd.ko and new/lib/ohci-hcd.ko differ
    Only in old/lib: scsi_mod.ko
    Only in old/lib: sd_mod.ko
    Files old/lib/uhci-hcd.ko and new/lib/uhci-hcd.ko differ

  • Oracle Forms Patch 10 for 8i

    Does Oracle Forms Patch 10 apply to Oracle 8i or do you have to be on 9i? Also, does applying patch 10, catch you up on all previous patches (1-9)?.

    The latest Forms 6i patch is 12. It is not 8, 8i or 9i specific. You need to check the related certification matrix and review the patch readme file to find out if the fixed bugs valid for your platform/configuration. For example, if you are running Forms 6i against a 9.2 database, the only certified 6i patch is 12.
    The patches are cumulative - patch 12 includes previous patch fixes.
    hope this proves useful
    regards

  • Yum install Oracle-Validated Transaction Check Error:

    Doing a yum install oracle-validated command with CentOS 5.3 and got these errors:
    Running rpm_check_debug
    Running Transaction Test
    Finished Transaction Test
    Transaction Check Error:
    file /etc/issue from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
    file /etc/issue.net from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
    file /etc/redhat-release from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
    file /usr/share/eula/eula.en_US from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
    file /usr/share/firstboot/modules/eula.py from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
    file /usr/share/firstboot/modules/eula.pyc from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
    file /usr/share/firstboot/modules/eula.pyo from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
    Error Summary
    Did the yum update work? Should I procede with the oracle install?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Tom,
    Could you please help me as im trying to install ORACLE OID 10.1.4.0.1 on OEL 5 n trying to use yum to load the default RMP
    ]# yum install oracle-validated
    Loaded plugins: security
    el5_oracle_addons | 951 B 00:00
    primary.xml.gz | 1.6 kB 00:00
    el5_oracle_addons 10/10
    epel | 2.3 kB 00:00
    primary.sqlite.bz2 | 2.0 MB 00:05
    el5_ga_base | 1.1 kB 00:00
    Setting up Install Process
    Parsing package install arguments
    No package oracle-validated available.
    repo file :
    [el5_ga_base]
    name=Enterprise Linux $releasever GA - $basearch - base
    baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL5/0/base/$basearch/
    gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5
    gpgcheck=1
    enabled=1
    [el5_u1_base]
    name=Enterprise Linux $releasever U1 - $basearch - base
    baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL5/1/base/$basearch/
    gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5
    gpgcheck=1
    enabled=0
    [el5_u2_base]
    name=Enterprise Linux $releasever U2 - $basearch - base
    baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL5/2/base/$basearch/
    gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5
    gpgcheck=1
    enabled=0
    [el5_u3_base]
    name=Enterprise Linux $releasever U3 - $basearch - base
    baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL5/3/base/$basearch/
    gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5
    gpgcheck=1
    enabled=0
    [el5_addons]
    name=Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch - addons
    baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL5/addons/$basearch/
    gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5
    gpgcheck=1
    enabled=0
    [el5_oracle_addons]
    name=Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch - oracle_addons
    baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL5/oracle_addons/$basearch/
    gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5
    gpgcheck=1
    enabled=1
    best regards,

  • Oracle Validated Configurations - Yes or No

    To satisfy my curiosity, I've just tried, for the first time, oracle-validated configuration on a clean 32-bit OEL-5.2 installation without oracle database software already installed. I've used the actual
    oracle-validated-1.0.0-8.el5.i386
    rpm package.
    According to the official oracle documentation's recommendations and naming convention, taken as a standard, I can say that oracle-validated configuration more failed than succeeded.
    CORRECT SETTINGS:
    * /etc/sysctl.conf has been correctly set
    * /boot/grub/grub.conf has been correctly set
    FAILED SETTINGS AND INCORRECT CREATIONS:
    * /etc/security/limits.conf has been correctly set for oracle, but all other entries in the file related to other users has been erased by validation script
    * no modification of /etc/pam.d/login file (pam_limits.so)
    * the script created 'dba' and 'oinstall' groups and 'oracle' user with 'dba' group as primary group (not 'oinstall'), that is not in compliance with official oracle documentation. To verify:
    [root@localhost ~]# id oracle
    uid=502(oracle) gid=502(dba) groups=502(dba),503(oinstall)
    If oinstall is not the primary group, what is it supposed to do?
    I'd appreciate if someone could clarify this dichotomy between Oracle official documentation's recommendations and "oracle-validated configuration".
    Thanks in advance.
    NJ

    frits hoogland wrote:
    NJ, (and segio, please take my response in account),
    If you read between the lines of my response I (more or less) make the some of the point you do.
    -required rpms
    'that's a job for OEL linux Installer': I can only come to conclusion 'the OEL linux installer' you talk about must be installation program of linux. There is no database option in there, so that installer can't help you. Or do you mean the database installer? The database installer only checks if the rpm's are installed.No, I meant OEL Linux installer (anaconda). When you choose packages to be installed, you can select them either individually or in various groups. A group called let's say "Oracle database 10g/11g required packages", as an option, would be very useful. I said - as an option - because OEL is not exclusively related to Oracle database. It is a distro, just like any other distro. Certainly this doesn't mean that "oracle-validated configuration" cannot be useful by checking (and resolving) the dependencies once again at any time when it is necessary. But, in any case, it should be the primary job for OEL installer at OEL installation time.
    I agree with you that loosing settings is a very bad thing and should be considered a bug.Of course.
    besides that I don't like the oracle user and groups to get random uid and gid's; in any environment you want that to be fixed numbers.
    besides that the points I wanted to make was:
    -it is not that it's not that hard to make a script which setups your environment in a basic way.
    another point is that for rough and quick setup, a default linux system can be used to run a default installed database. no need to do any tweaks with system settings.
    -an oracle validated package should not overwrite any settings (obviously), but should be flexible and 'steerable' so it can work together with system policiesCompletely agreed.
    Regards
    NJ

Maybe you are looking for