Are the Nehalem Mac Pros shipping?

Hi.
Are the new Nehalem Mac Pros shipping? I don't see any signs, reviews.
Did anybody get theirs?
W.W.
(I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question?)

Hi W.W.;
http://www.barefeats.com/nehal04.html
http://www.barefeats.com/nehal03.html
http://www.barefeats.com/nehal02.html
http://www.barefeats.com/nehal01.html
Allan

Similar Messages

  • Nehalem Mac Pro - long time to boot up?

    Question... unlike the 2008 and earlier models, why does the grey apple take a little longer to get to on the nehalem mac pro? If you put the 2008 and 2009 side by side, you will see that the time the grey screen shows the apple in the middle is really much faster on the 2008 compared to the 2009 - why is this?
    I thought it was a problem with my 2009 mac pro.. it seems this problem is on all of the 2009 series.. Has anyone noticed that the apple logo takes a little longer to get to on a Nehalem than on the 2008?

    Btw.. this is on all the models of 2009's.. and also most likely 2010 since they use the same logic board and processor tray for the most part..(details 4th coming..)..
    But, does anyone have a solution to this?? My start up drive is already selected, but yet it still takes a bit longer to boot up.. would changing the memory to non-ecc solve this problem? I heard xeon takes both non and ecc. I really don't need ecc for what i use my mac pro for..
    Is there a way to disable the tests?

  • Premiere Pro CC and the new Mac Pro - are all upgrades necessary?

    Monday I'm ordering the new Mac Pro because my Mid 2012 Mac Pro tower is simply too slow and crashy no matter how much money I sink into it. Thing is, every little upgrade I add onto this new Mac Pro is very expensive, so I want to make sure I don't add anything that won't make a difference in edit performance.
    My ultimate goal is to be able to work with 4k, and even 5k footage in 2014. More and more clients are giving me Red media, and my system right now can't handle it (I have to render proxy files for everything).
    Attached are my hardware upgrade options for my processor and graphics card. These options can only be offered when I order the computer. Neither the processor or the GFX card can be changed by me later. Note that these options alone almost double the computers's price (3600). As of now I assume that getting the fastest everything is the way to go, but is there any reason I should not go this high?
    jesse

    We have an issue when we send a film to the media encoder it crashes about half of the time for no particular reason
    Anyone else got that too with Premiere Pro CC and the new Media encoder?
    Lack of detailed info makes your question impossible for anyone to answer you!
    eg. ...."Doctor it hurts...anyone else got something that hurts?" 

  • What are your opinion on the new mac pro

    I feel while radical its too limiting thereby loosing fuctionality. But I also knw how the iSheeps would follow their iSheperd blindly. There making this kind of thunderbolt for everything the norm. I also know that the PC companies brought this on themselves they failed to innovate followed intel and nvidia to blindly with there xeons and quadro. The 3 major pc makers market professional workstations that you would probaly sell ur kidney to get one we have the z820 while very powerful its just 2 xpensive. Let's take for example the imac is the best bang for d buck most beautiful all in one if hp had used say a normal 3770k and a gtx 680m 4gb dat would have brought the price of the z1 down drastically. Let's say d average joe wants to be an editor, compositor, colorist. if u goole pc workstations hp z820 and dell T7600 would pop up but they are dam so xpensive hp consumer PCs are garbage. If there is onething apple knows the average pro does not want to be bothered with specs. I think the pc industry brought this on themselves. Wat of the smaller custom builder they focused so much on gaming big megatron design like cases with all the talk of FPS is every thing. My only prayer is that asus, msi gigabyte should stand up aganist apple and start releasing sexier designs, unless I fear even adobe is not safe cos most editors would gradually drfit back to FCPX sad wen inferior products triumphs a superior one. Pls drop ur thoughts also ur opnions as editors in your location the general trend. I hate to be locked in a garden where I am told this is what I need. I love choices.

    The 2 biggest problems with the new Mac Pro are the complete reliance on Thunderbolt for expansion and the Proprietary GPU modules. What happens when those Fire Pro cards are EOL and new GPU's are available. Will Apple go to any of the GPU manufacturers and get newer modules manufactured. Considering the applications that are moving to GPU processing, that was really a very bad idea simply because of the Minimum order quantity Apple will have to make to run another module. Apple will not be able to pull from the general video card supply which means they will be solely responsible for any production numbers required to manufacture to begin with. I personally expect this to be a major limitation as time goes on.
    The complete reliance on Thunderbolt for expansion really was bad idea and not ready for prime time. TB2 has the total bandwidth of a PCI-E Gen 2 5x. That is the entire pipe available to pump any video output data, high performance storage, I/O devices, and any number of devices available as time goes on especially video cards. Those trying to GPU process through that pipe are going to find that latency is way to much a problem to get that done. If Lightpeak was out and had the bandwidth of PCi-E Gen 2 or Gen 3 16X then I would say great. There is just to small a pipe and to much device moderation at the TB controller to do this now. The major problem that will develop from this later is when Lightpeak is out for the PC and devices start moving there. Where will Apple be with the Mac Pro when it's entire expansion is legacy in 1 to 2 years. As a final note Thunderbolt 2 is just Thunderbolt 1 with 1 bidirectional channel in stead of 2 unidirectional. This is not a major improvement over the original.
    The final consideration though not a major problem yet is the limit to 6 Core Xeons. This is likely due to the heat the 8 Core Xeons generate combined with a centralized cooling design. One of the major reasons to get a Dual Xeon is the 8 Core CPU options. Without that then there really is far less reason to get a Dual Xeon over a single 6 core and eventually 8 core workstation. This is a sacrifice that will reveal more later than now.
    Considering the Mac Pro is meant to be the flagship platform for Apple's Pro market, there are really way to many limitations on this one to compete with the PC equivalents. There is only so much OSX will add to any system.
    Eric
    ADK

  • What model HD are they putting in the new Mac Pro's?

    What model hard drives are they putting in the new Mac Pro's? I need to purchase a second drive in anticipation of a 2.8 I'm ordering and I want to get the same brand and model.

    Mine came with the Seagate ST3320820AS_P; however, WDs are also in the mix. And don't forget that the BTO options allow increasing drive size; those may be different makes as well.
    See this thread on MacRumors forum: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=432423
    Bottom line is that if it's important that they match, wait 'till you can open the box and know for sure.

  • Are the graphics cards offered  for the new mac pro HDCP  compliant??

    hi are the graphics cards offered for the new mac pro hdcp compliant??

    See if this helps
    http://macperformanceguide.com/index_topics.html#MacPro2013

  • Apple can be justly proud. These Nehalem Mac Pro's are amazing!

    hi Everyone,
    No questions today; just comments.
    My Mac Pro, 8-core 2.66/12GB's ram (4x2 + 4x1), Intel X25 M 160GB SSD boot and apps drive plus three 300GB Velociraptors, and ATI's 4870 graphics card, arrived late Tuesday and, while other work needs have pulled me off of working on it full-time, I've managed to get enough time in to get things up and running and I have to say I am more than impressed.
    You know how a curve of expectation takes place in us while we wait for some new thing to join our lives? Often, we can be quite on the mark but, in this case, I was way off. This computer is way more than I expected! Apple has more than 'done it again'. The functional design of the structural layout is awesome. So, so clean and clear. Putting the RAM in was pure fun. The way the whole mother board pulls out of the machine... smart design or what eh? The PCIe slots; how they are, where they are, how we add things into them: brilliant! And the hard drive system with it's direct connecting by simply sliding the drive trays all they way in only to be locked in tight when we close up the case with the case side's lever doing double duty with the drives and the panel. Again, brilliant.
    And the performance... I've barely touched the surface but I cannot wait to have my first serious day of working in my CAD program.
    The machine's very quiet too. Startup brings a rather load fan whirring out of the graphics card but that quickly settles. Adding to this the SSD's silent operation and the Velociraptors' very pleasant hum, tick, tick, tick, tick... the machine is a joy to listen to.
    I will be adding a good hard drive controller card and setting up a couple of RAID 0 sets eventually but, for now, everything's just running straight up. And it is great. Added to this already great experience is the LED Cinema Display I purchased along with it. I can't say enough good about this display. It is hugely impressive and, again, has absolutely knocked the socks off of my expectations. The image quality is incredible. I quickly connected and installed my Huey Pro color calibration gizmo and, voila´, superbly brilliant imaging. The monitor makes seeing so, so easy and it delivers a level of virtual three-dimensions unlike any monitor or tv I've ever seen. Huge kudos to Apple. They've done us a great thing here. Can't wait to see what they release when they put out a whole line of these LED monitors. The 24" size is excellent but what other sizes are coming? I'd be thrilled if they put out a 27" model. And what will be the new 'big monitor' size? I imagine not 30"... No point doing that. They need to put out a 33" or so version. And for what prices? Certainly the $1,000 Canadian dollars this 24 cost feels like decent value. I hope they get it together and put decently long connecting cables on them. That's one bug-bear I'm coping with now. I need a 2 meter Mini DisplayPort extension cable but the technology's too new... No one's making extension cables for them yet!
    So, while Apple made us wait longer than is more often the case, this release of the new Mac Pro's is extremely satisfying. Congratulations Apple. You've more than done it again!
    Yours in computer wonderland,
    JQ

    One, going from a G5 Quad to this pci access is a dream come true. I don't have an earlier intelamac to compare it with so maybe you're right though. Still I don't see any reason why people would have a problem with this on the new machines.
    Two, the storage write performance surprised me too but I'm not upset about it, the numbers for both are still very high, and I'm wondering what software and hardware changes in the future might do about that.
    Three, I guess machines and sensitivities differ, but my Mac is virtually silent. The only thing I hear is the fans on the video card when I start up and that goes away in seconds. The noisy ATI card reputation is not being lived up to in this case.
    After just shelling out thousands for an 08 Mac Pro I can understand your reasons for not spending thousands more on an 09 model. But overall by most tests I've seen the 09's smoke your machine, and I believe they were not just produced for their capabilities now, but for what's coming in the future.
    Like me with my Quad though, you'll just have to wait a few years, with me many years, to see the benefits of getting another machine.
    To Leslie... Putting blue ray into the new macs would have highly inflated their already very expensive prices. Windows machines can get by with it because they are so cheap, and cheaply made, to begin with. I'm pretty sure the program Toast can make blue ray disks, and there's a plethora of devices to attach to a mac to do so as well.
    And don't be so cynical about offsite reviews of products. I've read many scathing articles about products advertised on their websites. And if you've been reading articles about Macs as long as I have, you'd realize that the toughest articles on Macs come from people who are heads over heels Mac devotees.

  • XP 64 bit constant crashes on Nehalem Mac Pro 8 core

    We have recently purchased 4 additional Mac Pros to add to our existing render farm of older 8 core Mac Pros. We run both Mac OS and XP 64 bit on all of our Mac Pros so that each machine can be used for our Motion Graphics artists running After Effects as well as by our 3D artists. For the last 3 years we've had no problems with the 64bit XP installs on the older Mac Pros.
    Now we are unable to get a stable install of Windows XP 64 bit on any of the new machines. It constantly crashes especially on any Acrobat application such as Adobe Reader 9.
    We have tried this on 3 of our 4 new Nehalems so its not a hardware fault. We have even gone back from 16gb RAM to the original 6gb Apple RAM.
    We have used an XP 64bit SP2 disc and the Bootcamp x64 Ethernet and Intel Chipset drivers on the MacPros system disc. We then tried to download alternative Ethernet and Chipset drivers from the Intel site. Still the same crashes. All of this happens before we even bother trying to install the graphics drivers so we know that its not that.
    The blue screen error we get is:
    Disk.sys
    Page fault in nonpaged area
    Surely we're not the only ones trying to run 64 bit XP on the Nehalem MacPros?
    Message was edited by: martyn pot2

    Did you try W7 x64? Apple never provided XP x64 drivers so it was always something you had to find for yourself. And seems you were successful there.
    Seems like just building some Core i7s would have been suitable for your needs.
    I have found that extended disk testing and zero/long formt is essential anymore with hard drives.
    PCs can be fussy and tempermental with RAM though Mac Pro you are pretty much forced to use qualified chips.
    I would do all your driver updates first, before anything from Apple. And try to live w/o any Boot Camp. Always install graphics drivers, ethernet chipset from Intel. BC does add some help to power management, or did.
    You may just need to wait and see if those Snow Leopard DVDs have anything good on them, and hopefully bring drivers into the present instead of early 2008 era.

  • Wee Problem with Parallels Desktop and the Westmere Mac Pros

    Just got my new Westmere 8-Core Mac Pro last Friday, and spent the last four days in agony.
    I used Migration Assistant to transfer over my accounts from my old Mac Pro, but it crashed hard -- so hard that I had to reformat the hard drive and do a clean install of the system. So I decided to do a clean install of all of my programs as well, and the Westmere crashed on the Parallels Desktop installation. And, again, it crashed so hard that I had to reformat the hard drive and do a clean install of everything all over again.
    Today, I read a review of the Westmere Mac Pros in Macworld (http://www.macworld.com/article/153704/2010/08/quad8_core_macpro_2010.html?lsrc=top2), and learned:
    We ran into a problem running Parallels on the Westmere-based Mac Pros, so we could not complete the Speedmark 6 suite of tests. When booted into 64-bit mode (as the new Mac Pros do by default) the systems would crash with Parallels installed. Booting into 32-bit mode would allow the systems to start up, but we still couldn’t use Parallels. We eventually tried a complete wipe and reinstall from the Mac Pro’s systems disc and downloaded the very latest version of Parallels to eliminate any other potential problems, and had the same issue. Apple and Parallels are aware of the problem and assure me that Parallels is working diligently on a fix. The application worked just fine on the new quad-core Mac Pro with the Nehalem processor.
    Hoped I saved somebody some time.

    Hi akapod,
    Looks like they may have the fix out.
    Mac Pro (Mid 2010): Kernel panic when installing or restarting Parallels Desktop 5 for Mac
    Please let me know if it's available and fixes it.
    Thanks,
    ivan

  • A stupid question about the new mac pro

    I know the mac pro has dual ethernet ports, but does it also have wifi built in? Or do I actually have to plug it tonto my router? Sorry for the perhaps obvious question.
    PS. As a point of interest, I received mine yesterday. There was NOTHING inside of the box except for the cpu. I know the docs will be already installed on the cpu along with my purchase of Final Effex Pro X. It just took me by surprise is all. Now my next problem is trying to take my time and relish the exciting setup today. Unfortunately, I have compression fractures in my lower back from this last snow storm, so my enjoyment will be bitter sweet.
    Thanks for you help.
    ---jerry

    From the product page (http://www.apple.com/mac-pro/specs/):
    Wireless: 802.11ac Wi-Fi wireless networking;3 IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n compatible
    and
    In the box: Mac Pro, power cord
    So, yes, it does have Wi-Fi. However, you are likely to get better local network performance with a gigabit ethernet cable and a gigabit ethernet switch (assuming you have other local gigabit devices similarly connected).
    For many years, Apple has been cutting down on the amount of hardcopy documentation shipped with products. Two years ago, my MacBook Pro came with a tiny booklet that was little more than how to plug it in and turn it on, an equally tiny warranty booklet, and some logo stickers. I'm only a little surprised to hear they are now down to zero paper shipped.

  • How late is the new Mac Pro?

    Hi! My name is Alvaro and I would like to know how much time have you had to wating for the new Mac Pro since you order untill you get it. I ordered mine last monday (january 20th) and it was the first day that the apple store put "march" as a date of shipment.
    I'm excited!!
    Thank you!

    Folks been waiting for YEARS for a new mac, I suspect there is a lot of pentup demand, especially as Europe has been w/o a Mac Pro replacement or for sale for a year almost now.
    Some production and manufacuring lines get shutdown during holidays around the world and you can't just push a switch when it comes to some electronic parts, wafers. And even some early production can reveal the need for changes, new firmware, and other changes. Even the operating system that they ship with is likely showing newer builds every couple weeks until they reach a universal shipped build.
    So in some ways the delay can work in your favor. The first 3-4 months are often when they have a chance to test the hardware in the field. Getting software updates from vendors who also need to get their hands on new machine to see that it works properly - even FinalCut Pro 10.1 is seeing changes and improvements in how well it behaves, and that is an Apple suite.
    Long overdue. Summer of 2010 will afteralll be 4 yrs since the last Mac Pro configuration, which was only an "enhanced" Early 2009 model itself. That makes it 5 yrs on the same socket and base motherboard.

  • Performance with the new Mac Pros?

    I sold my old Mac Pro (first generation) a few months ago in anticipation of the new line-up. In the meantime, I purchased a i7 iMac and 12GB of RAM. This machine is faster than my old Mac for most Aperture operations (except disk-intensive stuff that I only do occasionally).
    I am ready to purchase a "real" Mac, but I'm hesitating because the improvements just don't seem that great. I have two questions:
    1. Has anyone evaluated qualitative performance with the new ATI 5870 or 5770? Long ago, Aperture seemed pretty much GPU-constrained. I'm confused about whether that's the case anymore.
    2. Has anyone evaluated any of the new Mac Pro chips for general day-to-day use? I'm interested in processing through my images as quickly as possible, so the actual latency to demosaic and render from the raw originals (Canon 1-series) is the most important metric. The second thing is having reasonable performance for multiple brushed-in effect bricks.
    I'm mostly curious if anyone has any experience to point to whether it's worth it -- disregarding the other advantages like expandability and nicer (matte) displays.
    Thanks.
    Ben

    Thanks for writing. Please don't mind if I pick apart your statements.
    "For an extra $200 the 5870 is a no brainer." I agree on a pure cost basis that it's not a hard decision. But I have a very quiet environment, and I understand this card can make a lot of noise. To pay money, end up with a louder machine, and on top of that realize no significant benefit would be a minor disaster.
    So, the more interesting question is: has anyone actually used the 5870 and can compare it to previous cards? A 16-bit 60 megapixel image won't require even .5GB of VRAM if fully tiled into it, for example, so I have no ability, a priori, to prove to myself that it will matter. I guess I'm really hoping for real-world data. Perhaps you speak from this experience, Matthew? (I can't tell.)
    Background work and exporting are helpful, but not as critical for my primary daily use. I know the CPU is also used for demosaicing or at least some subset of the render pipeline, because I have two computers that demonstrate vastly different render-from-raw response times with the same graphics card. Indeed, it is this lag that would be the most valuable of all for me to reduce. I want to be able to flip through a large shoot and see each image at 100% as instantaneously as possible. On my 2.8 i7 that process takes about 1 second on average (when Aperture doesn't get confused and mysteriously stop rendering 100% images).
    Ben

  • How can I move my three SATA HDDs to the new Mac Pro without backing up?

    Hello,
    I am doing initial shopping for the new Mac Pro but have come to the frustrating realization that I cannot move my HDDs to the new computer for free. Sure, I can migrate my OS drive to the new one, but my other three disks inside my 2007 Mac Pro are in a pickle. I want an economically viable method of getting those three drives to the new Mac without backing them up, formatting or something like that. Also, I would prefer a transfer method that will rival the speed of it being internal. I don't think USB 3.0 can do this, but Thunderbolt 2 can? Everything I've seen online has been outrageiously expensive or requires me to reformat (RAID).
    What I'm looking for:
    Connect three or more HDDs of various capacities to new Mac Pro
    Have the transfer speeds rival or exceed that of my current grandpa computer (Mac Pro 1,1)
    Have it not be incredibly expensive (anything over $300 is ridiculous)
    Have it be no more than two devices, one prefered unless they are individual enclosures that can either daisy chain and/or are inexpensive.
    Safe for my drives.

    >  a 3 TB, a 1.5 TB and a 500 GB.
    Most 3TB drives are going to be "green"
    The 1.5TB may or may not
    The 500GB is likely old, due for retirement if not worse.
    A pair of two drives of 2TB likely would be enough for now and plenty of dual drive USB3 cases.
    For a single drive and Thunderbolt docking adapter for using one drive at a time:
    http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-Backup-Portable-Thunderbolt-Adapter/dp/B009HQCARY/
    Under $300 case
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/OWC/METB7DK0GB/
    Or this one is fine and USB3
    http://www.amazon.com/StarTech-com-External-Enclosure-3-5-Inch-SAT3520U3SR/dp/B0 09C5VSFU/
    NO backup? You DO have some backups I hope, or you are on thin ice or walking tight rope.
    Some helpful guides on USB3 vs TB
    http://www.macperformanceguide.com/topics/topic-USB3.html
    http://www.macperformanceguide.com/index_topics.html#MacPro2013Transition
    http://www.macperformanceguide.com/topics/topic-Thunderbolt.html
    1TB WD Blue go for $60?

  • Using the New Mac Pro (can) - AE will not let me use Race Traced 3-D

    Using the New Mac Pro (can) - AE will not let me use Race Traced 3-D
    Hi, I'm using the new Mac Pro
    2.7 GHz 12-core Intel Xeon E5
    64 GB 1867 MHz DDR3
    AMD FirePro D700 6144 MB
    OSX 10.9.2
    I'm using After Effects 12.2.1.5
    When I attempt to invoke the race trace 3D renderer in a comp, I get this error
    "After Effects Error: Ray-traced 3D: Out of paged mapped memory for ray tracer. Your project may exceed GPU limits. Try closing other applications. Try updating the CUDA driver. (5070::2)"
    My preferences are set to use the CPU for Raytraced 3D since I do not have an Nvidia card.
    So, obviously there is an issue here in that it thinks I have an Nvidia card.
    I know (or assume I know) the cause for this is that when I set up this machine, I used Apple's migration assistant to move most of my data over from the previous gen Mac Pro which DID have a CUDA card.
    So my question is, what files can I delete/reset to cause After Effects to no longer look for CUDA files that do not exist on this machine?
    I do not have the CUDA control panel in System Prefs, so THAT did not carry over.
    Any ideas would be appreciated, thanks!

    > I know (or assume I know) the cause for this is that when I set up this machine, I used Apple's migration assistant to move most of my data over from the previous gen Mac Pro which DID have a CUDA card.
    Ugh. That causes so many problems.
    The first thing to try is deleting the CUDA frameworks from your Mac: Look in /Library/Frameworks for the CUDA.Framework and get rid of it.

  • Bootcamp and Windows 7 and 8 on the new Mac Pro (Dec 2013)

    I want to install bootcamp on my new Mac Pro (Dec 2013).
    Bootcamp says it supports Windows 7 and 8, but there is a bunch of new hardware with the new Mac Pro, so I am concerned about bootcamp support for it.
    Are there any issues with Windows 7 Pro install?  How about Windows 8 Pro?

    From what I see, only Windows 8 is supported on the new Mac Pro (Late 2013) with Bootcamp.
    See Boot Camp: System requirements for Microsoft Windows operating systems
    Look under Boot Camp requirements by Mac model
    Mac Pro
    Mac model
    Windows 8, 64-bit
    Windows 7, 64-bit
    Windows 7, 32-bit
    Windows Vista, 64-bit
    Windows Vista, 32-bit
    Windows XP, 32-bit
    Mac Pro (Late 2013)
    BCA
    "BCA"  indicates that Boot Camp drivers are automatically downloaded as part of the Boot Camp Assistant in OS X, for 2013 or later models of Mac computers.

Maybe you are looking for