Are you using the Extended Classic Scenario ?

Hello everybody,
Is somebody using the Extended Classic Scenario - SRM 4.0 ?
If yes, could you describe briefly the config steps that you follow ?
I have received and followed some advices here and I have checked all the official documents without success.. =( Until now, for some reason the EBP tries to create the PO in the backend =(
Thanks for your help guys !
Regards from Mexico.
Diego

Hi Diego,
If you activated the Extended scenario, the system cannot try to create directly a PO in the backend, it first has to create it localy.
If you are sure that:
-You activated the Extended scenario in SPRO (and not in the BADI)
-The system tries to create directly the PO in R/3 (as you say in your post)
Then there are only 2 solutions:
1- You have activated the scenario BADI, and tell the system to work in classic scenario
2- You have a bug in your SRM (which I doubt, cause I implemented this scenario on EBP 3.5, EBP 4.0 and SRM Server 5.0, and I never had this kind of problem).
Regards.
Vadim

Similar Messages

Can we use the Extended Classic Scenario with MM-SUS

HI, expert :
    In extended classic scenario ,the PO created in SRM system ,and then replicated into the MM system .You can't change it in MM system .
    So, in this situation ,I want to know the MM-SUS can be suitable or not ?The PO can transfer from ECC to SUS ?
   If I use the decoupled scenario ,which one I can select ?MM-SUS or EBP -sus ?
   BR !
Alex!

Hi Alex,
as noted by Bill, in MM-SUS is the extended classic not possible at all.
By default it's also not supported in the SRM-SUS. Please see the note 543544. If you would like to activate this, you need to pay a consulting fee for SAP:
"Please note that the full scenario can be enabled by a consulting solution, compare OSS note 700350."
Regards,
Peter

Freight is not updated in R/3 in the Extended Classic scenario

Friends,
Freight is not updated in R/3 in the Extended Classic scenario.
Once a PO is ordered, if a freight condition in SRM is applied, it does not get updated in R/3.
We have created a condition for Freight (Value and Percentage)in Create
Payment Conditions using the following menu path:
spro
--> Supplier Relationship Management
--> SRM Server
--> Cross-Application Basic Settings
--> Pricing
--> Process Payment Conditions
When creating a Purchase Order in SRM in the "Item Data" tab, there is
a"Pricing" option. Choose "Pricing" and select "Add Further Conditions"
from the drop down menu. Here Freight is available. Add Freight and
the PO record in SRM is updated with the Freight Condition. However,
upon ordering, the Freight condition does not transfer to the PO
recordin R/3.
We've heard this can be achieved by enhancement: only ie by implementing
set of BADIs.. But does anyone know WHICH BADIs we need? Or how we could find out? Thanks.

Hi
<b> You can either of these BADIs to handlwe the scenario.</b>
BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW Exit while creating a purchase order in the backend system
BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK   OLD Exit while creating a PO in the backend system
BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI ECS: PO Transfer to Logistics Backend
BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI Control Extended Classic Scenario
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points.
Regards
- Atul

MM-SUS for the extended classic scenario

Hi,
I have done SUS-MM for the classic scenario.
Did anyone implement SUS-MM for the extended classic scenario ?
Did you face any problem or will it be same as 'classic' scenario ?
Please help
Thanks
Pranav

There shouldn't be any problem especially when the scenarios are concerned. Since the PO's moves from MM-SUS.
Regards, IA

Are you using the MathScript Node in LabVIEW or the MathScript Interactive Window?

Are you using the MathScript Node in LabVIEW or the MathScript Interactive Window? I am very excited with the MathScript Node inside LabVIEW. However, I would like to see what other people think.
Avalim

Avalim,
Personally, I am determining that I like to use the MathScript Node in LabVIEW. It makes it easier for me to pass my data in and out of the LabVIEW environment!! But, like you, I am excited to see what any other users think!!
-Jeff P
Jeffrey P.
LabVIEW Product Management
National Instruments

Are you using the new features?

Some of you were very loud about getting certain features for PlayStation 4 and some even complained that they weren't available on day day1.
You asked for suspend/resume, a media player, dlna, the ability to pause downloads and you got it.
So are you using these new features?

Suspend and resume... for endurance racing modes on PJ Cars...Theres no save race status, kill the game lose the hole 1 hour 30mins race... sleep mode is on so if you pause the game the PS4 powers down and saves the game status.... Tested DLNA don't need it allready used plex VIA web browser then the transcoding PS3 and PS4 app...Pause and cancel down loads used. Music player use for PJ cars... As people stated if you Do not Use any thing then they vanish from the dynamic menu on PS4...Most are not even on the console untill a User hits the down load option... (technicaly you could use the youtube app to watch this...)

How are you using the Namespace Prefix?

As the subject says...
The top-level namespace prefix looks very useful for segregating projects into their own namespaces...is this what this is for, or does SAP have another recommended use for this prefix?
The vendor name already makes the namespace unique to a corporate entity (if you use the domain name), so anything after that is really only of importance to the internal development environment...

Even if your development isn't that big, using the 'name space prefix' would allow you to further segregate your codebase.
This also becomes important when your domain name is rather long - 15 characters. Take away four or so more for the namespace prefix, and you're left with 20 characters for the DC name. Add in a few separators, and you're down to 12-15 characters.
Obviously, readability can suffer when you start to abbreviate too much, so I'm looking for best practices when it comes to the namespace prefix.
Thanks for your comment.

How often are you using the Internet on the iPhone?

I was wondering how often you guys are using the Internet on the iPhone?
Do you guys enjoy using the the Internet on it?
Also, do you like the keyboard on it?
Just letting you know that I am typing this on my iPhone!!
Sam

I flew from PDX to DAB today browsing the internet both via wi fi (fast) and Edge (slow, but usable) at various airports and other locations. This browser is the best! I do not have to take a laptop with me anymore. The re size feature is the key, all phone browsers will have this in the future.
Its been years since I was excited about anything in the tech world (and I own a Software company) but I gotta hand it to Apple they really did a job with the iPhone.

As organizer of a family are you using the AppleID that purchases were initially made from?

When I try to turn on purchasing permission for my child, I get an error saying that the iTunes account is shared.

Hello Drew-Bob,
It sounds like you’re setting up Family Sharing on multiple devices and using the same Apple ID. As the Organizer you should continue to use your Apple ID, then create a new Apple ID for your child as shown in the article below.
Family Sharing and Apple IDs for kids
I hope this helps,
-Jason

In the Extended Classic scenario, what creates the PO on the SRM side?

Hi Experts,
This sounds like a simple question, however, I've been unable to find the answer.
What I am looking for is the process (report, workflow or function module etc etc) that actually creates the PO on the SRM side once the shopping cart has been approved (before it is replicated to ECC).
The reason for this is, after a support stack upgrade, the creation of the PO seems to have slowed down once the shopping cart has been created. I'm trying to track down where the PO gets created and what triggers that to happen, in order to work out why it isn't as quick as it was prior to the upgrade, but can't piece together the full end to end process.
I can see the "Workflow Without Approval Shopping Cart" workflow that obviously Releases the shopping cart and sets the status to Approved... I can then see the equivalent workflow for the PO (Workflow Without Approval for PurchOrder), but I can't work out the bit inbetween -
- How does the PO actually gets created in SRM and what triggers that to happen?
Any help will be gratefully received - thanks in advance.

its an event related to the shopping cart business object- BUS2121.
your approval workflow should be of status set released, which will trigger the methor BBP_REQREQ_TRANSFER, finished approval is the event which will be triggered by the workflow, based on this event, system will trigger reqreq_transfer.

Extended Classic Scenario - how does the integration work ?

Hi,
Apologies for asking a basic question, but we are looking at requirements for integrating SRM with R/3 using the extended classic scenario and I need to understand how the integration actually works ? How is the data transferred between the 2 systems ? Does it use BADI's, idocs etc ?
Many thanks,
fiona

Hi Olaf,
I just wanted to give some precision on what you said (in the thread How to "see" PO in EBP ? also)
The Extended classic scenario only refers to the local PO creation replicated in R/3.
In this scenario, in the R/3 PO only the data not managed/sent from the SRM are available for modification (which depends on the SRM version you use)
The "PR transfer from R/3" is called "Plan driven procurement", and in this scenario only RFC is used, the qRFC are only used for BDocs of the CRM Middleware.
Regards.
Vadim

Extended Classic Scenario, BADI for PO creation in R/3

Hi,
We are using the extended classic scenario. When the PO gets replicated from SRM to R/3, right now the field CATALOGID is not being transmitted to the backend R/3 system.
1) What BADI should I implement (and the method) to transmit the CATALOGID to R/3?
2) After implementing the BADI, do I also have to change the BAPI?
3) Is the BAPI used to transfer data from SRM to R/3, BAPI_PO_CREATE?
Thanks and Regards,
Peter

Hi Peter,
1-You can use BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI for ECS scenario.
Since the R3 PO does not have field for catalog id, the EKKO- BEDNR (Tracking Number) field can been used for example to store this information. In this BADI all the items are identified and their tracking number field is populated with a catalogue id value.
2-If you use the tracking number field, no use of R/3 BADI is required.
3-BAPI_PO_CREATE1
Please check my answers in this post :
catalogid field not going in R3 backend
Kind regards
Yann
Message was edited by: Yann Bouillut
Message was edited by: Yann Bouillut

Configuration steps for Extended Classic Scenario

Hi All,
Could you please let me know what are the configuration steps required for extended classic scenario.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Important Settings that Determine the Extended Classic Scenario
The following settings are required for the extended classic scenario:
u2022 At least one backend materials management system and accounting system is connected to the SAP SRM system and defined in the configuration setting Define Backend Systems.
u2022 Product categories from the backend procurement system are replicated and used in the SAP SRM system.
u2022 The target system for each product category is the backend system in the configuration setting Define Backend Systems for Product Category. Optionally, BADI BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS is implemented to determine the backend system.
u2022 The extended classic scenario is activated in the configuration setting Activate Extended Classic Scenario. Alternatively, BAdI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI is implemented to control the extended classic scenario based on customer defined rules.
u2022 If the backend system is an SAP R/3 version lower than 4.6B, you must define local purchasing organizations and purchasing groups.
u2022 If the backend system is an SAP R/3 version 4.6B or higher, you need to map the purchasing group used in the purchase order to the backend purchase group in one of the following ways:
u2022 Use a backend purchasing organization and purchasing group in the shopping cart and purchase order.
u2022 Use BAdI BBP_PGRP_FIND to determine a backend purchasing group in the shopping cart.
u2022 If a local (created in SAP SRM without reference to a backend system) purchasing group and purchasing organization are used, then a valid backend purchasing group is assigned to the RFC user that created the backend purchase order. This assignment is made in the backend system using user parameter EKG in Transaction code SU01.
u2022 Implement the user exit of the BAPIs BAPI_PO_CREATE1 (EXIT_SAPL2012_001 and EXIT_SAPL2012_003), and BAPI_PO_CHANGE (EXIT_SAPL2012_002 and EXIT_SAPL2012_004) to determine the purchasing group with a customer- specific logic.
This is for your additional information.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Vikas

Sourcing in extended classic scenario

Hello, all
We are using the extended classic scenario in SRM 5.0.
In sourcing cockpit I have the following problem. In spro Supplier Relationship Management/SRM/Server/Sourcing/Define Sourcing for Product Categories I set Sourcing Always Carried Out. From a shopping cart the purchase order is created automatically as the data complete, but I'd like to sent shopping cart to the sourcing, where from a shopping cart create bid invitation or purchase order. How do it?
Please help,
Best regards,
Guzal

Hi Guzal,
As informed by Claudia, Incomplete mainly means no vendor assignment, no price etc.
If the vendor is assigned at the shopping cart level by means of a contract the shopping cart (details) is complete. Even in this case the SC should go to Sourcing cockpit in case of "Sourcing Always carried out" is chosen in the sourcing column.
In the above case the P.O gets directly created from SC only when the options
" Sourcing never carried out" & " Sourcing carried out for items w/o assigned source of supply" were chosen.
Hope you will be more clear on this issue. Any clarifications always welcome.
Rgds,
Teja

Payment term key with limit days in Extended Classic Scenario

Hello,
We have an SRM 4.0 implementation (SRM Server 5.0 with Support Package
9) using the Extended Classic Scenario.
When a shopping cart is created, it must be approved, and then a
purchase order is generated (first locally at SRM, and then is
replicated to the backend).
The problem is that the payment term key (field at header level EKKO-
ZTERM) of the backend purchase order is empty, only in cases when we use a payment term key which have several different values for the
field "limit days" (T052-ZTAGG in backend, BBP_PAYTERM-ZTAGG in SRM).
Example:
     ZTERM     ZTAGG
      K180           09
      K180           19
      K180           31
If the payment term key selected has no several values for the field "limit
days" (one single entry), the payment term key arrives correctly at the backend purchase order.
Example:
     ZTERM     ZTAGG
      E000           00
In SRM table BBP_PAYTERM we have upload the backend payment terms
(using report BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS). In other threads it is said that you must copy the entries generated by the report with the logical system of the SRM system, but in extended classic scenario it seems to be not necessary.
We have already implemented note 846009, in order to use always the backend payment term, but the error didnt get resolved.
We have our vendor business partners mapped to the local and backend
purchasing organizations, but it is only necessary indicate the Payment term key for the Backend Purchasing Organization.
Regards

hi,
Pls see the foll notes:
Note 576349 - Terms of payment in the ECS
Note 541934 - Modification note: Copying base date from T052
Note 953999 - ECS: Terms of Payment values not in PO header
<b>Note 940453 - Backend payment term data not updated in the extended PO
Note 945018 - Incoterms data not transferred to the back end</b>
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

Are you using the Extended Classic Scenario ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for