ARE1 base value

hi guru's
I need base value of material in excise invoice as well as while creating ARE1 there is feiled in form how can i capture base value in that feiled can any one please help me (we are useing tax procedure is TAXINN)
regads
dharma

Hi
Check whether the Excise base value is updating in the table J_1IEXCDTL.
Check the note
Note 1035545 - Excise base amount is not updated in table J_1IEXCDTL.*
regards
Prashanth

Similar Messages

  • Excise Base value is missing in ARE1

    Hi All,
    I am doing Export sale through u201CExports under claim of rebateu201D process, my customer currency is in USD (in CMR), and I have maintained condition record for price in USD, also I have maintained Exchange Rate in OB08.
    In ARE1 I could not found u201CExcise baseu201D value (blank), if I maintain the condition record in INR, I could found Excise base value, what could be the reason?
    Please suggest me that, how to bring the u201CExcise Baseu201D value in ARE1 if condition record for PR00 is in USD (CMR also maintained with USD)
    Regards,
    Ram

    Hi,
    Thank you for ur reply,
    I have checked in Table (Excise Invoice Item) J_1IEXCDTL , I could not found "Excise Base" value (no value), but, as I have already mentioned that, if I maintain the condition record for PR00 in INR, then it's updating Excise Base. Is there any solution for this? (if condition record in USD)
    For Excise Duties we  are doing the round off, this is also affecting while converting the values with Exchange rate i.e.USD to INR. (Differance in values) how to avoide this?
    Regards,
    Ram

  • Excise base value in ARE1 screen shows 0

    Dear Gurus
    Even after excise calculation has been made in the excise invoice, Excise base value field from which basic excise duty is calculated is showing 0 value in ARE1 screen while we do J1ia101. other values  such as BED, SHC are apperaing. Any ideas??
    regards
    Sidhu

    Hi
    Check whether the Excise base value is updating in the table J_1IEXCDTL.
    Check the note
    Note 1035545 - Excise base amount is not updated in table J_1IEXCDTL.*
    regards
    Prashanth

  • In ARE1 Excise base value is not appearing.

    Dear All,
    We are using TaxINN,In ARE1 Exise base value is not appearing.
    Please give the inputs
    deepti

    Hi,
         u go to path IMG - Logistics General - Taxes on goods movement - india - Account determination - specify excise accounts per excise transaction
    click new entries button
    ARE1    credit      Cenvat clearing account
    same     same       PLA Bed account
                                RG 23 Bed account
    ARE1      Debit     Cenvat Reversal a/c
    neat go another step
    2.specify g/l account per excise transaction
    ARE1 fieds fillup with G/l accounts rg & condition wise.
    this steps more helpful u
    regards,
    janaki Ram

  • Excise base value missing in ARE1

    Dear Experts,
    In ARE1 document, excise base value is not getting picked. BED, Ecess & SHcess are getting updated properly.
    Can anyone guide on this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rajeshwari

    hi
    check whether the excise base value in the table J_1IEXCDTL if not then apply this note
    Note 1035545 - Excise base amount is not updated in table J_1IEXCDTL.
    If the excsie base value is not updating then it wont come in ARE-1 and also check the table J_1IEXITEM for excise base value
    regards

  • Excise base value is not comming to are3 and are1

    hi sap gurus
    can any one tell me about excise base value is not flowing to are1and are3.

    HI
    First check your condition types here the condition category should be H. for your base price
    Check these SAP notes
    1171753 Excise base zero when excise invoice created in background
    1035545 Excise base amount is not updated in table J_1IEXCDTL.
    regards
    Edited by: PRASHANTHgoud on Jul 10, 2009 6:09 PM

  • In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO

    Hi expert's,
    In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO,with what referance values get add to base value.
    waiting for your valuable response,
    Regards
    V.raj

    hi,
    we Tried with your following reply ! but still not finding exact value in base value .
    (MATERIAL PRICE* QTY IN MIGO * EXCHANGE RATE)
    thanks & regards
    V.Raj

  • How to display Base values (AFS Grid) in the Report

    Hi Friends,
    We ar using AFS, in that we have Grid value like 0003A34
    (8 chars: first 4 chars colour (0003), A represents Cup, 34 represents size of the Material), in that we can able to store the Base values like for International or US,
    and for size 34 equivalent to 70 like wise.
    In our reports we are using ALV grids, and showing the existing grid value like 0003A34, but we need to show Base value list like INTL or US etc, based on the region / area, the report should show the equivalent grid value like 0003A70 etc.
    Please help me how to do this.
    Thanks
    Shankar

    Dear Shankar;
    I think you will be able to achieve what you try to do using grid conversion in AFS. Base Grid values can be converted to other values based on the customer, vendor or material depending on your requirement. This need to be configured in IMG and then the ID must be assigned in the Vendor or the Material Master as per the requirement.
    This is somewhat complex config. Please contact me if you need any more clarifications ([email protected])
    Azwath Mohammad
    http://www.sapafs.net

  • CIN: Alteration of base value for CST in TAXINN

    Hi,
    In our business process there is a requirement that CST should not be calculated only on Basic Price + Excise Duties (BEDEcessSEcess) rather base value for CST should be Basic Price + Excise Duties (BEDEcessSEcess) + 2 Additional Surcharges as mentioned below:
    Basic Price     100.00
    BED (10%)     10.00
    Ecess (2%)     0.20
    SEcess (1%) 0.10
    Additional Surcharge1     4.00
    Additional Surcharge2     6.00
    Base for CST 120.30 (100100.20.14+6)
    CST (2%)     2.41 (2% of 120.30)
    Total Value     122.71
    The tax procedure being used is TAXINN
    Is there any standard routine or subtotal available so that by using this in PO Calculation Schema and TAXINN the base value of CST can be modified as desired?
    Please provide some useful ideas.
    Thanks in advance
    Edited by: Sapdear on Aug 29, 2011 8:22 AM

    Hi,
    The additional surcharges are condition types in the calculation schema of PO whereas CST is being calculated in Tax Procedure TAXINN so how "From" and "To" functionality can work. The surcharges are getting calculated in PO Pricing and CST in tax procedure TAXINN (both at different places)
    We want to use a tax code (BED10%Ecess2%SEcess1%+CST2%) to calculate Excise Duties and CST by additional surcharges taking into account.
    Can any one provide some idea to resolve this issue?
    Thanks in advance

  • Excise base value is not changing in MIGO excise tab for Import  PO scenari

    Dear Gururs,
    We are using MIGO to capture & Post Excise Invoice for our Import PO (PO type ZIMP). the problem is, when we change the qty in MIGO Qty tab, corresponding base value is not getting update in Excise tab. we are not creating the planned cost mIRO directly we do the GRN.
    Please suggest a solution.
    Thanks
    Shital

    Hello Shital  ,
    You are using the India Scenario right?
    The issue can be because you have not assigned a zero tax code to the line item. For India please make the tax code field in PO as mandatory so that the user does not save the PO without atleast a zero tax code.
    Maintain the tax code & proceed. You will see the tab in MIGO.
    Regards
    Plauto

  • Problem in picking base value from PO while doing goods receipt for multiple POs

    Hi,
    Our user is trying to post goods receipt for two purchase orders which have same vendor. After the materials of two POs are allocated in the item detail screen and checked the item ok, system throwing error as "Please check the base value of the item is zero" ( also excise tab does not appear for last three line items). This error does not occur when we are trying to do the goods receipt separately for each POs. Only when we do goods receipt for both the POs together, we are facing this error.
    Please let us know what could be the reason. Is there an issue with standard CIN? Any notes to be applied? Please help!

    Refer these notes for the issue.
    1528009 - MAA: incorrect distribution of goods receipt
    quantities
    and
    1677707 - Determining the valuation type for stock transport orders
    at the time of GI
    For Excise tab not appearing, you have to check J1ID for "Material-ChapterId combination" and "Cenvat Determination".
    Regards
    Binoy

  • Creation of a new Formula Routine for condition base value calculation

    hello people,
    i am stuck up in a situation where SAP has itself said that nothing can be done.
    but i know you all can guide me to some way or the other
    see, the scenario is like this
    1. i have to calculate the base value for a pricing condition.
    which will follow the formula
    net value + excise duty + freight
    2. in standard routines two things are normally bieng used
    xkwert for the value that has to be finally calculated(taking reference of routine 004)
    komp-netwr for the net value
    3. i have to calculate the excise duty by adding up all the base values of existing pricing conditions like JMOP, JEC1 etc that i have which i saw in internal table
    XKOMV on debugging
    4. now freight is to be calculated from all the values of condition types that are in KOMP which is a structure and no internal table is defined in standard main program
    now ppl
    can you guide me by looking at the standard program
    what is this xkwert field and where it is assigning the value.
    how to get field from other structure and table.
    please guide as to how to approach the problem.
    thanks and regards
    Nitin

    HI,
    the scenario u r talking abt is condition based value formuls of VOFM transaction.
    here the data is retrieved as 'X' structures and will hold normal tables with respective names. and in this case all the pricing data is in KOMV ie XKOMV
    Final amount including tax
    form frm_kond_basis_004.
      xkwert = komp-netwr + komp-mwsbp.
    endform.
    always calulation is done in xkwert field and final value is stoerd in xkomv.
    *.................. text ............................................. *
    Condition base value formula to get the assessable value of the     *
    saleable material from j_1iassval. If the value is not maintained   *
    then the selling price will be taken as the base                    *
    TABLES: J_1IASSVAL.
    DATA XXKOMV LIKE KOMV .
    XXKOMV = XKOMV.
    SELECT SINGLE * FROM J_1IASSVAL WHERE J_1IWERKS = KOMP-WERKS AND
                                         J_1IMATNR = KOMP-MATNR.
    IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
        IF J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALNDP NE 0.
        XKWERT = J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALNDP * KOMP-MGLME / 1000.
        ENDIF.
        IF J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALASS NE 0.
        XKWERT = J_1IASSVAL-J_1IVALASS * KOMP-MGLME / 1000.
        ENDIF.
    ELSE.
       XKWERT = XXKOMV-KAWRT .
    ENDIF .
    XKOMV = XXKOMV .
    ENDFORM.
    and as far as ur  req select allthe condition type data and sum and take the average value and pass it.

  • How to display modified condition base value in Pricing Procedure?

    Hi everyone:
    I used a formula to change the condition base value (via the VOFM transaction) of various price conditions that are assigned to the same material. In this way, I can distribute the total quantity of the item line in smaller quantities for each price condition.
    Now the problem is that in the conditions tab of the sales order, I can not see the Condition Base Value of each Price Condition, and that's a little confusing.
    Did Anyone know's a way to show the modified Condition Base Value in the Pricing Procedure of the Condition Tab?
    Thanks a lot,
    Ginno Giuffra

    Thanks JJ:
    Yes,  I can found the modified base value in the condition details, but I still need to show it in the Pricing Procedure scheme.
    It is curious that the table options does not allow you to add that field to the escheme.
    Does anyone knows a user exit wich can modifye the table?
    Thanks again,
    Ginno Giuffra

  • Data type of the base attribute or the base value does not match...

    ...the assigned expression.
    Hello all,
    I always get the Error
    +<ERROR+
    TEXT="'DWH.CUB_REGISTRATIONS_AW.REGISTRATIONS': XOQ-02517: Der Datentyp des Basisattributs oder der Basisgröße stimmt nicht mit dem zugeordneten Ausdruck überein.
    XOQ-01400: Ungültige Metadatenobjekte"/>
    The English message must be something like this:
    The data type of the base attribute or the base value does not match the assigned expression.
    when I run my mapping. The attribute REGISTRATIONS is NUMERIC (12,2) in the Cube and I map a NUMERIC(12,2) constant in it.
    I use a simple OWB-Mapping for loading, but I don't understand why it doesn't function. Other mappings where the attributes are out of a
    table I put in a cube are running well.
    I tried different things, but nothing fixed my problem. Any idea ?
    Thanks a lot for help
    Michael

    Technically this is a 'warning' from the server, not an 'error'. This means that the change you made should have been submitted, but you get an warning message on the client. AWM would suppress this warning, but evidently OWB does not. Can you switch to use AWM?
    Here is the definition of the warning along with 'cause' and 'action' sections. (Unfortunately these sections are not translated into German for some reason.)
    >
    02517, 0, "The data type \"%(1)s\" of the base attribute or base measure is different from the mapped expression \"%(2)s\"."
    // *Cause: Either the base attribute or base measure with the mapped expression was set to an inconsistent data type, or it was mapped to an expression of a different data type from its fixed data type.
    // *Action: When changing a mapped expression for a base attribute or base measure, ensure that the expression has the same data type; otherwise, set the data type of the base attribute or base measure to NULL first. When a base attribute or a base measure has an existing mapped expression, do not set it to a different data type.
    >
    It is probably safe to ignore this warning, but if you can post the relevant XML for the cube, then will probably be able to spot the problem. I assume that REGISTRATIONS is a measure in the cube CUB_REGISTRATIONS_AW, so this is what you can look for in the XML:
    (1) The definition of the base measure along with the datatype. It should be something like this
    <Measure>
      <BaseMeasure
        SQLDataType="NUMBER(12,2)"
        ETMeasureColumnName="REGISTRATIONS"
        Name="REGISTRATIONS">(2) The mapping info for the measure, which should looks something like this:
    <MeasureMap
      Name="REGISTRATIONS"
      Expression="...">
      <Measure Name="REGISTRATIONS"/>
    </MeasureMap>I don't know if you can get the XML directly from OWB. If not, then DBMS_CUBE.EXPORT_XML should work (assuming you are in 11.2). You could also attach AWM and save the cube to an XML template.

  • In correct Excise Base Value in Import PO

    Dear Experts ,
    I have an query on the  Excise Base value in Import PO .
    The problem is I have made a Import Po , paid the customs duty through MIRO & now when I am doing J1IEX_C wrt to commercial  invoice  , its showing the Excise base value which is less then the value  it should be , the tax amt like Excise BED, AED, Se cess & E cess is getting calculated correctly.
    Can somebody tell me where the problem is.
    Regards,
    DGN 21
    Edited by: dgn21 on Dec 3, 2010 6:24 AM

    >
    dgn21 wrote:
    > Dear Jeyakanthan,
    >
    > As explained earlier after paying to the customs through MIRO, I am doing J1IEX_C, in this transaction, the excise duty is being calculated correctly but the Assessable shown is incorrect.
    > I have following condition in schema:
    > Gross Price (A):
    > Insurance %(B)
    > Basic Landing Charges (C):
    > Assessable value: (A)(B)(C)
    > Basic customs Duty (D)
    > CVD (E)
    > Ecess on CVD (F):
    > S E Cess on CVD (G):
    > And then other conditions
    >
    > Presently the system is calculating the Assessable value as (A) + (D) {i.e. Gross price +Basic Customs duty}, but it should be (A) + (B) +(C).
    > Kindly tell me where I need to do the changes so I can get the correct Assessable value as desired.
    >
    >
    > Thanks in advance
    Check import pricing procedure calculations in M/08 ?

Maybe you are looking for