Article/References to XI/PI Message Flow

Does anyone have any good articles or references that show how a message flows into and out of XI/PI? Im specifically looking for something that shows how the message hits the communication channels and goes through the sender agreements, receiver agreements, interface mappings, etc.

Message flow in XI look
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/05/25/understanding-message-flow-in-xi
Regarding Message Flow in XI
Pipeline steps look thread
Pipeline steps?
pipeline
Thanks,
Hetal
Edited by: hetal shah on Feb 4, 2009 9:28 PM

Similar Messages

Goods Receipt in PO AND Message Flow Update in Inb. Delivery using WMMBXY

Dear All
This question is related to a previous one posted in:
Post Goods Receipt for Inbound Delivery using WHSCON IDoc
We have a stock transport order (PO) for which we create an inbound delivery. The despatch advice (EANCOM D96A DESADV) is sent to our logistics partner who returns the same EDI message with the received quantities (goods receipt).
Using the inbound IDoc WMMBID02.WMMBXY I have successfully posted the goods receipt for the original PO. However, the message flow in the delivery is not updated. When we post the goods receipt (transaction MIGO) in dialog for the delivery we see the GR in the message flow.
I have used the following values with the segments of WMMBID02.WMMBXY (SAP release = 4.6c):
E1MBXYH:
Reference = <number of delivery>
Transaction code = 'MIGO'
E1MBXYI:
Movement type = '101'
Purchasing doc. = <number of PO>
Item = <Item no. in PO>
Movement ind. = 'B'
I am not sure about the correct movement indicator but failed when using a value different from 'B':
The movement indicator is derived from the transaction code.
Permitted values:
'' Goods movement w/o reference
'B' Goods movement for purchase order
'F' Goods movement for production order
'L' Goods movement for delivery note
'K' Goods movement for kanban requirement (WM - internal only)
'O' Subsequent adjustment of "material-provided" consumption
'W' Subsequent adjustment of proportion/product unit material
QUESTION: Does anybody know if and how inbound WMMBID02.WMMBXY can be used for both the goods receipt in the purchase order AND the message flow in the inbound delivery?
Regards
Uwe

Hello Everybody
My initial mapping of the WMMBXY IDoc proved to be correct.
For more details please refer to:
[Note 833603 - EDI: Goods receipt for stock transport order|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/833603]
Regards
Uwe

Replacing default namespace in OSB message flow

I'm in the process of setting up a simple OSB proxy and could use some help figuring out how to change a default namespace in the response from the business service.
The proxy and business service use different namespaces which we'll call "http://foo.com/namespace/proxy" and "http://foo.com/namespace/business". In my routing request message flow, the contents of $body look like this and I'm able to use a Rename action with XQuery expression "./sof:*" to change "http://foo.com/namespace/proxy" to "http://foo.com/namespace/business":
<sof:Execute xmlns:sof="http://foo.com/namespace/proxy">
<sof:adminName>MyAdaptor</sof:adminName>
<sof:request>
[escaped payload omitted]
</sof:request>
</sof:Execute>
This works fine, but in the response message flow, I need to revert the namespace and am having difficulty because the response uses a default namespace instead of using a prefix:
<ExecuteResponse xmlns="http://foo.com/namespace/business">
<ExecuteResult>
[escaped payload omitted]
</ExecuteResult>
</ExecuteResponse>
If I define a prefix P2L in the expression editor to correspond to "http://foo.com/namespace/business", I'm able to reference the ExecuteResponse element as "./P2L:ExecuteResponse", but then I get stuck.
If I try use a Rename action to change the namespace for "./P2L:*", only the ExecuteResponse element is renamed to <sof:ExecutResponse xmlns:sof="http://foo.com/namespace/proxy">. Upstream in the calling application, there's an XML stream reader exception because (I assume) ExecuteResult is not found and parsed.
I also tried using a Replace action against "./P2L:ExecuteResponse/@xmlns" to replace its contents with "http://foo.com/namespace/proxy". I also tried "./P2L:ExecuteResponse/@P2L:xmlns". Neither worked.
Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong, or suggest a different approach? Assume that changing the calling application or business service is not an option.
Thanks!

>
If I define a prefix P2L in the expression editor to correspond to "http://foo.com/namespace/business", I'm able to reference the ExecuteResponse element as "./P2L:ExecuteResponse", but then I get stuck.
If I try use a Rename action to change the namespace for "./P2L:*", only the ExecuteResponse element is renamed to <sof:ExecutResponse xmlns:sof="http://foo.com/namespace/proxy">. Upstream in the calling application, there's an XML stream reader exception because (I assume) ExecuteResult is not found and parsed.
>
You pattern "./P2L:\*" matches just one element so it's ok that the payload's namespace wasn't touched. If you want to rename namespace for all elements try "//P2L:*". However, I'm not sure whether this is what you want. Try do describe what you do, what you want and what you get instead.
>
I also tried using a Replace action against "./P2L:ExecuteResponse/@xmlns" to replace its contents with "http://foo.com/namespace/proxy". I also tried "./P2L:ExecuteResponse/@P2L:xmlns". Neither worked.
>
I think it's not a good approach to replace content of xmlns as this attribute is not a common xml attribute.

Message Flow in Integration Engine

Dear Friends,
Kindly can someody share how the message is flowing in Intergration engine after the message taken from Adapter engine.
If you have any block diagram it will be helpful for me

Hi Karthik,
There are 6 stpes for the message processing thats only called
PIPELINE Steps.
what are all the steps involved in the Pipeline processing.
Sender Adapter picks up the file from the file system, converts it to XML and places it in the payload of an XI-SOAP message. Then it posts this message to the Integration Server pipeline via http(s).
XI pipeline steps are:-
->Sender Agreement
->Receiver Determination
->Interface Determination
->Interface Mapping
->Receiver Agreement.
When a source message reaches the Integration server, it performs 6 steps before the message reaches the destination. The steps are:
1) Receiver Determination: This steps determines the system that participates in the exchange of the message.
2) Interface Determination: For each receiver determine which interface will should receiver the message.
3) Message Split: If more than one receivers are found, Xi will instantiate new message for each receiver.
4) Message Mapping: Mapping to transform the source message to destination message format.
5) Technical Routing: Bind a specific destination and protocol to the message.
6) Call outbound Adapter: Send the transformed message to the adapter or a proxy.
One can examine these steps in Runtime Workbench using the Transaction: SXMB_MONI.
message flow in XI
The life cycle of the message is explained in detail by taking an example scenario. The file is picked up by the Sender File adapter and the data is inserted into DB table by Receiver DB Adapter.
       The adapter engine uses the messaging system to log the messages at every stage. This log is called the Audit Log. The audit log can be viewed from the runtime work bench (RWB) to look into the details of the lifecycle of the message. During our journey we will also have a look at the messages that are logged at different stages.
Note: This article is targeted for the newbieu2019s who want to understand the message flow in Adapter Engine. So the insight into the message lifecycle is provided here by taking only the Technical adapters (File/ JDBC/ JMS/ Mail) into consideration. It doesnu2019t delve into the lifecycle of the messages that have reached XI Adapter Engine using RNIF/ BC/ CIDX adapters.
ONWARD JOURNEY:
Fig1. Message flow from Adapter Engine to Integration Server
1.     For the message to be picked up by the communication channel, the channel should be associated with a sender agreement. Here creation of a communication channel doesnu2019t ensure the message to be polled and picked up by the adapter. The message reaches the adapter in its native message format. As the communication in SAP XI happens in XI message format, a module inside the adapter converts the message in native format into XI message format.
2.     During this process, a message ID is generated for the message. To build the XI header (sender agreement details like the sender system, sender message interface and the interface namespace) the details are fetched by performing a CPA lookup(collaboration-partner-agreement are the configuration object details that have been created using the configuration time. The details are updated into the runtime cache when you activate the Configuration objects in Integration builder u2013Configuration time. This cache is referred to as CPA cache).
3.     This message is then sent to module processor for further processing. During the process of sending the message to module processor, the message u201CApplication attempting to send an XI message asynchronously using connection AFWu201D is logged.
4.     The module processor performs steps like structure conversion, communication channel specific conversions (that have been specified in the u201Cmodule tabu201D of the adapter channel). These conversion modules are executed in the same sequence as mention in the communication channel.
5.     After the successful execution of the conversion modules, the appropriate module (call SAP adapter module) of the module processor is called which will send this message for persistent storage. This message is put into the Send Queue of the messaging system for further processing. Messages like u201CMessage trying to put into the send Queueu201D and u201CMessage successfully put into the queueu201D are logged during this process. A confirmation message (success/ failure) is sent back to the sender application at this stage. This confirmation message is used by the channel to perform various steps like deleting the file that has a processing mode as delete.
6.     The message that has been put in the Send Queue has to be picked up and sent to the Integration Engine. The Adapter Engine and XI Integration server use XI Adapter for internal communication purposes. So the XI Adapter picks up message from the send queue and parses the XI message. In this process, the status of the message is set to DLNG and. Messages like u201CThe message was successfully retrieved from the send queue and message status set to DLNGu201Dare logged.
7.     The XI adapter performs a SLD look up (System landscape Directory) to find the Integration server with which the Adapter framework has register itself.
8.     On successful SLD look up, the message is sent via HTTP to the XI IS pipeline, using the pipeline URL (http://hostname:abap-httpport/sap/xi/engine?type=entry). . If this is successful, a message u201CThe message was successfully transmitted to endpoint http://hostname:8000/sap/xi/engine?type=entry using connection AFWu201D is logged and the message statues is set to DLVD means message has been successfully delivered to the endpoint( XI IS in this case)
Fig2. Audit Log of message during onward journey
RETURN JOURNEY:
The return journey commences when the IS has successfully processed the message and delivers it to the Messaging system using the URL u201Chttp://hostname:50000/MessagingSystem/receive/AFW/XIu201D
br>
Fig3. Message flow from Integration Server to Adapter Engine
1.     When the Integration Server (XI IS) finishes processing of the pipeline steps (like receiver determination, interface determination and interface mapping), the message has to be delivered to the required Receiving system. So the XI Integration server will send the message to the messaging system of the Adapter Engine (AE) using the mentioned above. Once the message is successfully received by messaging system, the message u201CThe message was successfully received by the messaging system. Profile: XI URL: http://hostname:50000/MessagingSystem/receive/AFW/XIu201D is logged.
2.     As discussed Integration server and Adapter Engine use XI adapter for internal communication purposes. So the XI message that has been received by the messaging system URL is parsed by the XI Adapteru2019s protocol handler.
3.     The XI message is put into the receive queue and persisted. During this stage messages like u201CUsing connection AFW. Trying to put the message into the request queue; Message successfully put into the queue.u201D are logged.
4.     The XI messages that are put in the receive queue are retrieved by an application (Worker thread) and are sent to AFWListenerBean. AFWListenerBean is a module (an EJB) in Adapter Engine that is capable of parsing the XI message. On successful receive of the XI message by the AFWListenerBean, messages like u201CThe message was successfully retrieved from the request queue.u201D are logged and the status of the XI message is set to DLNG.
5.     The AFWListenerBean reads the receiver agreement and the corresponding channel from the XI header to determine the appropriate adapter. In this stage the adapter channel is logged in the audit log. u201CDelivering to channel: XYZ_Channelu201D
6.     The message is forwarded to the module processor where additional steps like structure conversions and extra modules specified in the adapter are performed.
7.     The exit module is called and the message is sent to the appropriate adapter (DB Adapter in this case). The format conversion will be executed within the specific adapter and sent to the Receiving system (DB in this case) using the channel that has been determined by the AFWListenerBean and the required action is reformed (select statement is performed in this case). On successful processing of the message the status is set to DLVD.

Where are message flow symbols in Oracle BPA?

Hi, all,
I am trying to create a BPMN model with two different pools/organizations in it. The only flow between pools should "message flow" (according to BPMN rules, dashed line with arrow) but I could not find message flow anywhere in BPA pallete. The only option is connector ("sequence flow") that technically should connect events/activities within one pool. Is there a reason that message flow is missing from symbols or I just could not find it?
Igor.

If I am not wrong then Oracle B2B does not set this header. PIDX implementation guide (http://www.pidx.org/standards/upload/PIDX%20XML%20Implementation%20Guideline%202002-02-14%20V1.0.doc) mentions about "partnerDefinedPIPPayloadBindingId" implementation as -
This data element is used to identify a proprietary binding ID that permits the RosettaNet based parts of a multipart message to bind to non-RosettaNet parts. This element is populated to cover where the trading partners wish to exchange messages based on proprietary document formats (non-RosettaNet Schema) using a RosettaNet PIP.
PIDX requirements support the use of the RNIF Framework but will not use existing RosettaNet PIPs. Given that this is the case, * Trading Partners will typically not populate this data element. *From above reference it does not seem to be mandatory parameter. Still if your requirements bound you to use this header, contact Oracle Support to get help on this.
Regards,
Anuj

BDOC message flow and its architecture

Hi Expert,
It can be a simple question but i have a doubt regarding the flow of messages using SAP CRM middleware.
The scenario is like:
1. Message flows from ECC to CRM through a BDoc. (It can be opposite way also)
2. The BDoc fails in CRM due to some data issue.
3. A BDoc message id is generated.
4.Now the data is corrected in ECC and initial load was triggered.
5.The messages are flowing correctly.
So my doubt is:
1.What will happen to the old BDoc?
2. Do the initial or delta load processes the messages with new BDoc ID or through the old BDoc ID?
3. If the messages are processed through new BDoc id, can the old BDocs be deleted?
Please help me understand this concepts of BDocs and please provide me to some study material to get more undertsanding of the BDOC message flow architecture.
thanks,
Vicky

Hello Vicky,
i think I understand exactly what your confusion is all about.
1.What will happen to the old BDoc?
The old Bdoc will remain in error state until it is archived or set to processed state.
2. Do the initial or delta load processes the messages with new BDoc ID or through the old BDoc ID?
It will be a separate BDoc with a new BDocId. If you get an Error in SMW01 this is beyond the queueing, so later Messages will not get queued behind your faulty bdoc. They will also not "update" your BDoc in any way. Later BDocs will Bypass a bdoc in error state and update your object in CRM if the error in data has been solved in ERP before. If the data error is not corrected, you will get a second failed bdoc.
3. If the messages are processed through new BDoc id, can the old BDocs be deleted?
Best practise for the Bdoc with error would be to set it to processed state. That way there is no way that Bdoc can be processed afterwards. The BDoc will then be archived with the next run.
Best regards,
Lutz

ON PREM Outbound emails showing in dummy non-configured office 365 account message flow trace

Dear Community,
We have an on-prem exchange 2013 server and an office 365 account which is completly standalone.
Whilst the office 365 account is standalone, it does feature the email address we use for on-prem (Ie. the domain name in office 365 account is not active for any office 365 services however has passed ownership verification thus it's just sitting there)
We DON'T use EOP nor do we have any connector rules on our on-prem system that go to office 365 however when I randomly went into the 'Message Flow Trace' section in our office 365 account, there is recorded outbound mail which was sent from our On-prem
server.
The ONLY mail that was recorded in the message Trace in Office 365 was emails we had sent from On-prem to other office 365 accounts (For example btconnect.com, and some of our clients whom also use office 365) .
How is office 365 picking up mail we've sent from our On-Prem server? Is there integration out of the box in exchange 2013 which auto interfaces with office 365? What on earth has happened here?
I'm really confused.
-------- For troubleshooting purposes...
Headers in the email which arrived in my personal office 365 account from the ON-PREM SERVER
Received: from AMSPR05MB065.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.89.142) by
DBXPR05MB079.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.138.22) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 15.1.93.16 via Mailbox Transport; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:16:31
+0000
Received: from DBXPR05CA0014.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.178.14) by
AMSPR05MB065.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.89.142) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 15.1.99.14; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:16:30 +0000
Received: from DB3FFO11FD028.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7e04::145) by
DBXPR05CA0014.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:9434::14) with Microsoft
SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.106.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Mar 2015
16:16:29 +0000
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (157.56.112.128)
by DB3FFO11FD028.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.47.217.59) with Microsoft
SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.99.6 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Mar 2015
16:16:28 +0000
Received: from DB4PR04CA0010.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (25.160.41.20) by
DB3PR04MB236.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.242.130.24) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 15.1.99.14; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:16:26 +0000
Received: from DB3FFO11FD040.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7e04::184) by
DB4PR04CA0010.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:9852::20) with Microsoft
SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.106.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Mar 2015
16:16:26 +0000
Received: from mail.localdomainhere (<IP OF OUR ON-PREM SERVER GOES HERE>) by
DB3FFO11FD040.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.47.217.71) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 15.1.99.6 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:16:25
+0000
Received: from INT-EX-01.localdomainhere (192.168.142.20) by
INT-EX-01.localdomainhere (192.168.142.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
15.0.913.22; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:15:55 +0000
Received: from INT-EX-01.localdomainhere ([fe80::aca4:88cf:3eaf:57dc]) by
INT-EX-01.localdomainhere ([fe80::aca4:88cf:3eaf:57dc%12]) with mapi id
15.00.0913.011; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:15:55 +0000
From: Jake Ives <[email protected]>
To: Jake Ives <[email protected]>
Subject: Test01
Thread-Topic: Test01
Thread-Index: AdBXX6dyI5u99OGoSKmXroKKyMA3Tg==
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:15:54 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.142.73]
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary="_004_081f834d85b7436193fa887613b9dac7INTEX01localdomainhere_";
type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Return-Path:
[email protected]
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 1
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of domain.com
designates <IP OF ONPREM SERVER HERE> as permitted sender)
receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=<IP OF OUR ON-PREM SERVER GOES HERE;
helo=mail.domain.co.uk;
Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is <IP OF OUR ON-PREM SERVER GOES HERE>)
[email protected]; ives.gb.net; dkim=none (message not
signed) header.d=none;ives.gb.net; dkim=none (message not signed)
header.d=none;ives.gb.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=domain.com;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:<IP OF ON PREM SERVER HERE>;CTRY:GB;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;BMV:0;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(438002)(189002)(199003)(71364002)(87936001)(2656002)(98436002)(92726002)(102836002)(108616004)(19625215002)(19618635001)(512954002)(92566002)(229853001)(107886001)(66926002)(18206015028)(84326002)(16796002)(19300405004)(450100001)(19580395003)(2900100001)(77156002)(15974865002)(62966003)(5250100002)(5310100001)(99936001)(15395725005)(16236675004)(110136001)(17760045003)(67866002)(86362001)(19617315012)(19627595001)(15975445007)(19580405001)(54356999)(22756005)(50986999)(6806004)(46102003)(74482002)(106466001)(33646002)(7099025)(24736002)(15669805003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:DB3PR04MB236;H:mail.domain.co.uk;FPR:;SPF:Pass;MLV:ovrnspm;MX:1;A:1;PTR:mail.domain.co.uk;LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB3PR04MB236;UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AMSPR05MB065;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <[email protected]outlook.com>
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;UriScan:;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(5001007)(5005006);SRVR:DB3PR04MB236;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB3PR04MB236;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004);SRVR:AMSPR05MB065;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AMSPR05MB065;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 05066DEDBB
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB3PR04MB236
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-MessageDirectionality: Incoming
Received-SPF: Fail (protection.outlook.com: domain of domain.com does not
designate 157.56.112.128 as permitted sender)
receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=157.56.112.128;
helo=emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com;
Authentication-Results: spf=fail (sender IP is 157.56.112.128)
[email protected];
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.112.128;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(339900001)(489007)(189002)(71364002)(199003)(102836002)(92726002)(15975445007)(92566002)(17760045003)(62966003)(106466001)(15395725005)(16236675004)(77156002)(110136001)(107886001)(450100001)(5310100001)(229853001)(22756005)(98436002)(2900100001)(5250100002)(19625215002)(66926002)(99936001)(33646002)(15974865002)(19617315012)(19627595001)(67866002)(54356999)(108616004)(19300405004)(19618635001)(87836001)(2656002)(18206015028)(85426001)(512954002)(86362001)(6806004)(46102003)(74482002)(84326002)(19580395003)(50986999)(19580405001)(7099025)(24736002)(15669805003);DIR:INB;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:AMSPR05MB065;H:emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:Fail;MLV:ovrnspm;MX:1;A:1;PTR:mail-am1on0128.outbound.protection.outlook.com;LANG:en;
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStripped: DB3FFO11FD028.protection.gbl
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersPromoted: DB3FFO11FD028.protection.gbl
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: 927151e3-02c4-4c46-5539-08d22576df82
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AVStamp-Service: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: 1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2015 16:16:28.9728
(UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: cd52bfe2-da2e-446d-b8f1-e78db861d489
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=bfa61dad-1543-4f3b-8075-03498e9f4fcb;Ip=[IP OF ON PREM SERVER HERE]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AMSPR05MB065
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: DB3FFO11FD028.protection.gbl
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-EndToEndLatency: 00:00:03.5565465

MX records are not set to office 365, the MX is pointing directly to the on-prem exchange server.
The problem is; Office 365 Mail Delivery Trace is displaying mail we've sent via our On-Prem server - We are having trouble understanding why this is happening.
To clarify, the message tracer in Office 365 is displaying outbound mail (Which for example, a user has sent out from their outlook) BUT only outbound mail which is being sent to other office 365 users.
We do not have mail on office 365, only on-premise hence the reason why we are flabbergasted to why the mail we are sending out would be displaying on the office 365 message tracer.
To further clarify, we are only seeing addresses in the office 365 message trace which belong to recipients whom use office 365 for their mail.
Hope this makes sense.
getting messy O365 users to another O365 you mean?
You mentioned if they send email using their MS Outlook Client.
I'd suggest you to send another email to the same recipient but using OWA
There may have been an office 365 connector in Outlook.
Where Technology Meets Talent

Xslt in message flow

hello,
i have an XSLT document and i want to use it to make a transformation in the response message flow of my proxy service.
i call a webservice through business service but i dont know which action,in the "response actions", corresponds to making an XSL transformation.
I tried "replace" without success, the others actions seem not to be for transformation.
in the xquery expression editor, i put my XSLT resource to execute.
in "2. bind input", i dont know exactly what to put, there isn't any explication for "2. bind input" in the edocs.
and for "3. bind variables", i have nothing (no variables have been found)
could someone indicate me how to configure and use the result of my xslt in a message flow ?
thank you very much.

We built a custom service and invoked it asynchronously (non-blocking) using the Publish Action (with QoS as BestEffort) in the different places wherever we needed the audit functionality.
And this service would do its work on the background as a part of a separate thread, thereby not impacting the actual service that was implementing the business logic.
This is not optimal because there is still some time consumed for the publish action (though it is less) in the actual service with the business logic. But atleast this did allow us to overcome the limitation of the handlers to some extent.
I generally do not prefer to use java callouts as the prerequisite is that the methods exposed need to be static, which might create some contention when many threads try to invoke the same java callout methods at the same time.
Thanks,
Patrick

BPM Message Flow

Hello,
I am aware that we use concept of Message Flows for communication between activities in two different pools.
Now let me say i have 5 activities and Pool A and 5 in Pool B. Now message flow is generic in between pools. How do i define that one message flow is for one specific activity.
I am new to BPM and may sound stupid too. But how does the above thing work? Guys help me out.

Hi Yogesh,
In SAP NetWeaver BPM on CE 7.11 only one so called active pool is supported. Other pools are for documentation purposes (in ordeer to outline the context the process is running in).
In case the other 4 activities should also particiapte in the process it would be necessary to split the pools into several lanes in order to define different responsibilities.
Hope that helps,
Martin

Loop in message flow found

Hi all
I created a idoc to abap proxy for the xi adapter i used http destination with my destination defined in sm59.
In sxbm_moni i get the error:
LOOP_IN_MESSAGE_ROUTING
Loop in message flow found: system is.00.metsapxd, pipeline CENTRAL with inbound adapter XI already processed
Anyone know how to fix the error?
Thx

Hi,
I think your end business system i.e. where proxy exists -- this application system is configured as "integration engine/HUB". Try to keep it as (SXMB_ADM -> Integration engine configuration) type of business system as "applicaiton system" instead of integration engine/server.
Regards,
Rao.Mallikarjuna

How to return "HTTP/1.0 401 Authorization Required" from OSB's Message Flow

How can I return "HTTP/1.0 401 Authorization Required" header from OSB's Message Flow?
Using of "HTTP Transport -> Authentification" is not possible, because I need flow condition. Transports Headers activity from design palette doesn't allow to send such headers.
Practical usage: request for kerberos ticket by sending two headers: 401 and WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate...

Can you briefly expand the use case for better understanding?
HTTP Client---> Hand Shakes or what ever ----> HTTP Proxy (OSB )---> Pipeline----
Philosophy behind pipeline is that it is designed to work on the request. Correct me if I'm wrong.
What you are asking is ability to control the hand shake either in Pipeline or some way during proxy configuration. Unfortunately there is no configuration that is exposed for HTTP proxies in OSB to control that behavior.
Manoj

Where to find detail message flow in scenario of AQ to DB adapter?

I have installed hub, aq and DB adapter. The repository, adapters seem to be run fine. I put some messages in AQ and found out that there were no messages appeared in DB. The messages could be found in AQ_OUTBOUND_QUEUE. Sine there is no error message in adapter log files(trace is turned on), I am not sure it's the hub problem or adapter problems. Where should i check the message flow so to decide the problem?
Any constructive advice is welcome.

Hi Johnson,
Have you set the queue to the event in the deploy tab of AQ application in iStudio? If not then please set your OUTBOUND_QUEUE to the corresponding event and then do push metadata after starting the adapter. You can have a look at "Appendix A -> Deployment -> Setting Queues" of Interconnect User guide for this.
regards,
Sandeep

Need help for the message flow in sap xi system?

Hello All,
My requirement is some wat different............in the existing production system the message flow is 3500 per hour......... now we want to develop new scenario and the message flow will be 8500 message per hour.
Client is not giving me the system details ...like network details and i need to say that can we send 8500 messages in the existing system with out changing the process speed or data base.
also please advice the best ways to increase the performance in the sap xi system when the message flow is huge.
thanks in advace.
Thanks and Regards,
chinna

>
chinnasapxi wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> My requirement is some wat different............in the existing production system the message flow is 3500 per hour......... now we want to develop new scenario and the message flow will be 8500 message per hour.
> chinna
3500 to 8500 is not a message count tht needs to be worried about
but to be on the safer side what is the average size of a single message?
if the size is not a significant one u can go ahead

How to stop/start SAP XI Message flow in controlled way?

Hi All,
I am facing a scenario where for maintenance activity I need to stop all message flow in XI, system should be up and running but no message should processed by XI. I also don't want to shut down system.
Is there any way by which I can stop message coming to XI?
I don't want to deactivate communication channel..
Regards,
Gourav

Hi,
maybe (just an idea) you can try to deregister all queues?
raport : RSXMB_REGISTER_QUEUES
then all the queues should stop but I haven't checked it
so you'd have to do some tests and find out if this
does not have any other negative impact of some other
XI processes
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions">XI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</a>

Regarding Message Flow in XI

Hi Experts,
I was go through the Blog given by Siva Maranani
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/05/25/understanding-message-flow-in-xi
But in this After sending the Xi Message from send Queue to Integration Engine...
What wi be the process inside this IE.
Please let me know
Regards
Khanna

But as per my knowledge in the IS the Pipeline services wil be done( Includes Receiver det, Interface Det, Mapping, Logical rout, Tech. routing, Call Adapter, Message Split )
It means there is no further process inside the IE??????????
Messages received at the Integration Server are processed through a defined series of steps called Pipeline Services. These pipeline services are part of Integration Engine which in turn is a part of Integration Server
Only the XI Adapter wil pick the Xi msg from Send Queue to IE.......Thats it?????/
Yes. Thats the main task of XI Adapter. It also does the SLD lookup.

then this IE wil pass this XI Msg to the IS ..... Right????????
As mentioned, IE is part of IS
Regards,
Prateek

Article/References to XI/PI Message Flow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for