AS Rock Z77E-ITX + Intel SSD 330 Series segfaults under load

Hi,
I just finsihed installing a new system with an AS Rock Z77E-ITX mini ITX mother board (Intel Z77) and an Intel 330 Series 120GB SSD.
The setup is EFI+GPT+LUKS+LVM+EXT4 and it segfaults if I put heavy io load on the SSD.
I have tried to remove as many components as I can and it still segfaults in the same way.
So to reproduce it a simple as possible I run bonnie++ on an empty ext2 partition (which I guess is mounted using the ext4 subsystem):
$ mkfs.ext2 /dev/sda2
$ mount /dev/sda2 /mnt
$ bonnie++ -f -d /mnt
Writing intelligently...Segmentation fault
and at the same time..
$ journal -f
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: Modules linked in: snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek nls_cp437 vfat fat coretemp kvm_intel kvm arc4 iTCO_wdt iTCO
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: CPU 2
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: Pid: 1700, comm: bonnie++ Not tainted 3.6.10-1-ARCH #1 To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77E-ITX
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8116aba9>] [<ffffffff8116aba9>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x49/0x150
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff8802127df998 EFLAGS: 00010286
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: RAX: 0000000000000230 RBX: ffffea0004260600 RCX: 000000000003eb42
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: RDX: 000000000003eb02 RSI: 0000000000000050 RDI: ffffffff8125f268
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: RBP: ffff8802127df9d8 R08: 0000000000016f80 R09: 0000000000045995
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: R10: 000000000000302d R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000050
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: R13: ffff880216c08100 R14: ffff08010b8fa148 R15: ffff8802127dffd8
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: FS: 00007f3aa438d740(0000) GS:ffff88021f300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: CR2: 00000000006b0428 CR3: 0000000212e2d000 CR4: 00000000001407e0
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: Process bonnie++ (pid: 1700, threadinfo ffff8802127de000, task ffff8802131f9020)
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: Stack:
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: ffff8802127df9d8 ffffffff8117916b ffff88010b8eec98 ffffea0004260600
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: ffff8802127dffd8 0000000000010c20 0000000000000050 ffff8802127dffd8
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: ffff8802127dfa18 ffffffff8125f268 ffff8802131f9020 ffffea0004260600
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: Call Trace:
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8117916b>] ? mem_cgroup_charge_common+0x6b/0xa0
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8125f268>] radix_tree_preload+0x68/0xf0
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8111d3cb>] add_to_page_cache_locked+0x6b/0x160
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8111d4da>] add_to_page_cache_lru+0x1a/0x40
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8111d598>] grab_cache_page_write_begin+0x98/0x100
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff811b17e0>] ? generic_write_end+0x60/0xa0
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffffa01ebc10>] ext4_da_write_begin+0xa0/0x230 [ext4]
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffffa01ee52d>] ? ext4_da_write_end+0xad/0x390 [ext4]
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8111c6a4>] generic_file_buffered_write+0x124/0x2b0
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8111e139>] __generic_file_aio_write+0x1b9/0x3b0
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8111e3af>] generic_file_aio_write+0x7f/0x100
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffffa01e48c9>] ext4_file_write+0xa9/0x490 [ext4]
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff81491895>] ? __schedule+0x435/0x920
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8117ef07>] do_sync_write+0xa7/0xe0
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8117f7a8>] vfs_write+0xa8/0x180
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8117faea>] sys_write+0x4a/0xa0
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8149a26d>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: Code: 89 f4 49 8b 45 00 65 48 03 04 25 a8 db 00 00 48 8b 50 08 4c 8b 30 4d 85 f6 0f 84 ca 00 00 00 49 63 45 20 4d 8b 45 00 48 8d 4a 40 <49> 8b 1c 06 4c 89 f0 65 49 0f c7 08 0f 94 c0 84 c0 74 c4 49 63
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: RIP [<ffffffff8116aba9>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x49/0x150
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: RSP <ffff8802127df998>
Dec 25 23:25:59 a1 kernel: ---[ end trace 6975559273a23439 ]---
Another time i got this:
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: Modules linked in: snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek nls_cp437 vfat fat coretemp arc4 kvm_intel kvm iTCO_wdt iTCO
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: CPU 0
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: Pid: 467, comm: flush-8:0 Not tainted 3.6.10-1-ARCH #1 To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77E-ITX
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01d0930>] [<ffffffffa01d0930>] ext4_num_dirty_pages.isra.39+0x130/0x290 [ext4]
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff8802127839a0 EFLAGS: 00010206
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: RAX: ffff88010e0f8af8 RBX: ffffea00043069c0 RCX: 0000000000000223
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: RDX: ffff08010e0f8af8 RSI: 00000000000046a6 RDI: ffff88021f5bd1e8
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: RBP: ffff880212783a80 R08: ffff880212760500 R09: 00000000000046a8
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: R10: 57ffd93e5e306980 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000000046a6
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: R13: ffff8802069df450 R14: 0000000000008000 R15: 00000000000046a6
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88021f200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: CR2: 00000000007b0000 CR3: 000000000380c000 CR4: 00000000001407f0
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: Process flush-8:0 (pid: 467, threadinfo ffff880212782000, task ffff8802132468d0)
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: Stack:
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: ffff880212686570 ffff880212760500 00000000000046a8 00000000000046a5
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: ffff880212783a90 00000000000046a8 000000000000000e 0000000000000000
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: ffffea00043066c0 ffffea0004306700 ffffea0004306740 ffffea0004306780
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: Call Trace:
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffffa01d687e>] ext4_da_writepages+0x62e/0x690 [ext4]
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8123bc48>] ? blk_finish_plug+0x18/0x50
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff81127169>] ? generic_writepages+0x59/0x70
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff81128971>] do_writepages+0x21/0x50
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff811a911b>] __writeback_single_inode.isra.31+0x3b/0x190
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8107a15e>] ? wake_up_bit+0x2e/0x40
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff811a98fa>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x2ba/0x4a0
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff811a9b7f>] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x9f/0xd0
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff811a9ec3>] wb_writeback+0x313/0x340
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff811aa936>] wb_do_writeback+0x1b6/0x260
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff811aaa73>] bdi_writeback_thread+0x93/0x2d0
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff811aa9e0>] ? wb_do_writeback+0x260/0x260
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff81079a13>] kthread+0x93/0xa0
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8149b484>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff81079980>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: [<ffffffff8149b480>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
Dec 25 23:41:01 a1 kernel: Code: 4c 8b 63 10 49 39 f4 0f 85 fe 00 00 00 48 8b 03 f6 c4 08 74 66 48 8b 03 f6 c4 08 0f 84 5d 01 00 00 48 8b 43 30 48 89 c2 0f 1f 00 <48> 8b 0a 80 e5 02 0f 84 0c ff ff ff 48 8b 52 08 48 39 d0 75 eb
$ uname -a
Linux a1 3.6.10-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Dec 11 09:40:17 CET 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I'm guessing its either a bug in the ext4 sub system, problems with the mb/hd-controller, problems with the SSD or a combo
Any suggestions are super welcome.
-ob2

I just tried with the Ubuntu 12.04 LTS server installer iso image. I could not see the dmesg output but the system froze hard after a minute of writing to the SSD with dd. I guess I should return the SSD and try with a new one. Is it common that a faulty SSD takes down the system? Feels sloppy.
-ob2

Similar Messages

  • Intel SSD 320 Series Unreliability, Intel or OSX Lion at fault?

    Hi,
    I have been using the Intel SSD 320 Series 160Gb SSD in a Quad Core iMac for a couple of months.
    Its was running fine all through the Lion Beta program, but Monday evening, my iMac with OSX Lion locked up and I had to power off the system (that never happens to my Mac normally).
    On rebooting, I got the flashing folder with a question mark, signifying no devices with a valid OS were detected
    The following morning, I had to replace the SSD with a 1TB platter drive and restore my system (thank god for Time Machine).
    Disk Utility repoerts the SSD as 8.4Mb in size (no, thats not a typo) and thinks the drive is unformatted.
    This is very disappointing, so much for hoping SSD would be more reliable than mechanical drives
    I loved the speed of the SSD, but this type of failure whether its Intel's fault or OSX causing this catestrophic failure I am still unsure, but either way its totally un-acceptable and has made me wary of wanting to try again with SSD!
    D.

    To help future users searching, I have an update.
    This appears to be a bug in the Intel 320 Series SSD drives which Intel have acknowledged.
    I applaud them for owning up to the problem, but I am furious they let a product of this type get to market with a serious bug like this in the first place!!
    If anyone is using one of these drives I suggest you make sure your Time Machine backups are running fine and are up-to-date and constantly check out the link below for a firmware update that at the time of writing has still not materialised.
    Rest assured, you have a ticking time bomb on your hands!
    http://communities.intel.com/message/133505
    http://www.techpowerup.com/149064/Intel-Acknowledges-SSD-320-Series-8-MB-Bug-.ht ml

  • K9N2 Diamond - bios does not recognise Intel SSD 520 series

    Hi,
    I have a K9N2 Diamond motherboard and BIOS v2.7. I recently bought an Intel SSD 520 Series and when I connect it, the BIOS does not recognise the HDD at all. When I try to install Windows 7, the HDD is shown at the list, but it says that I can not install Windows at the HDD.
    I have tried to connect the HDD at SATA port 5 and 6 and set the RAID mode to ACHI and also at ports 1 and 2 and set the RAID mode to IDE. Nothing works.
    Any ideas?
    Regards,
    George

    .and does the problem appears using the HDD which was equipped in this notebook?
    If the BSOD would not appear using the HDD, then a problem is realalted to the inserted SSD drive.
    In many cases firmware updates are released for SSD drives and in some cases this might be a solution.

  • Intel SSD 320 Series 8 MB Bug neue Firmware?

    Hallo,
    nach einem Stromausfall hat meine Intel SSD der 320er Serie den 8 MB Bug.
    Sprich die SSD wird mit nur noch 8 MB erkannt.
    In vielen Foren findet man die Lösung: Ein Firmware Update.
    Leider ist die Festplatte von Lenovo, daher geht die original Intel Firmware nicht.
    Auf der Lenovo Support Webseite findet man die aktuelle Firmware Version nicht.
    Ich habe die Firmware LE05 (4PC1LE05) und brauche die Firmware LE06.
    Ich habe zwei Artikel gefunden, die auf die LE06 Firmware verweisen, leider gehen die Downloads nicht mehr, weil Lenovo die Webseitenstruktur geändert hat:
    http://support.lenovo.com/in/hi/documents/ht074473
    http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/T400-T500-and-newer-T-​series/T420-SSD-8MB-Error-on-Current-4PC1LE04-Firm​...
    Ich habe schon den telefonischen Lenovo Support angerufen, aber die konnten mir nicht weiter helfen.
    Wo bekomme ich jetzt die neue Firmware LE06 her?
    SSD Modell: SSDSA2BW160G3L
    Notebook: T420s

    Ich konnte das Problem jetzt ohne neue Firmware lösen.
    Ich habe die Intel SSD Toolbox installiert: https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?​DwnldID=18455
    In der Toolbox habe ich Secure Erase ausgeführt. Nach einem Neustart hat die SSD jetzt wieder ihre 160 GB.
    Die Daten sind zwar weg, aber man hat ja ein Backup.
    Die LE06 Firmware wäre trotzdem super, damit beim nächsten Stromausfall nicht das gleiche passiert!

  • W510 type 4876-A11 With Intel SSD 520 Series BSOD

    Hi lenovo community,
    please help regarding this issue.
    I took out the SSD from another computer which has never failed me.
    I swap into thinkpad W510, and format and re-install windows 7 HomePremium . Keep getting Blue screen of death.
    Tried win7 Professional, BSOD also.
    Swap a hard disk into the w510, no issues.
    Put the SSD into another computer, no issues.
    W510 bios updated to latest.
    SSD firmware update to latest 400i.
    please help.
    should i call thinkpad service hotline? It's still under on-site warranty.
    seems like a compactibility issue.

    Welcome to Lenovo Community! Terryhoho
    Go to Control Panel > Lenovo - Airbag Protection > Uncheck Enable Active Protection System. (Check only when you are using HDD and not SSD) SSD does not require Active Protection System as it does not contain mechanical parts.
    http://www.jdhodges.com/blog/tip-shock-protection-unnecessary-if-you-have-a-ssd/
    If the step above does not resolve your issue.
    1. What source do you use to reformat? Windows 7 Original DVD (Clean Install), Lenovo Recovery Disk or others?
    2. If you install using Windows 7 Original DVD, download and install System Update. (If Recovery Disk, can skip this step as it's preinstalled in the image)
    3. Download and install the latest Intel Chipset driver.
    4. Go to Control Panel > Lenovo - Update and drivers > Install Critical and Recommended Updates, up to you for optional updates.
    Peter  
    W520 (4284-A99)
    Give kudos to reward people for their assistance | Mark the thread solved if the solution works | Direct e-mail regarding technical problems will be ignored
    =====================================
    Dolby ; IdeaPad Slate Tablet ; Equalizer APO

  • Intel SSD 510 120gb in Macbook Pro 2010

    Hi all. I have bought an Intel SSD 510 series 120gb and installed it instead of Superdrive. After that I cloned the Macintosh HD disk to a new SSD.
    I moved user's home directory to the HDD drive, enabled noatime for SSD, turned disk sleep off and hibernate to 0. Everything works fine. Today my friend told me that Mac OS X 10.6.7 does not support trim command and my SSD resource will not be long. I checked System Information and saw that he was right. In the sistem information there is a line: TRIM Support:          No. I know that new 2011 macbook pro comes with TRIM support: yes function. How can I enable TRIM support in Snow Leopard for my SSD?
    Thank you very much.

    Recently installed same type of SSD (Intel 520 120GB) in our 2010 Macbook (white) and runs just as well as its big bro. No problems at all. Storage isn't an issue since most stuff's in the cloud these days and we carry large files around on a USB stick. Way to go!

  • Intel SSD Toolbox work with T510?

    I recently swapped in an Intel 320 series 300gb SSD in my T510.  The drive works great, and Windows recognizes it as an Intel SSDSA2CW300G3.  But the Intel SSD Toolbox application doesn't see the drive (or any drive, since that's the only one in the system).  I've tried the usual uninstall/reinstall, reboot routines, with no effect.  A post somewhere suggested that turning off ACHI in bios might help, but when I did that, Windows wouldn't boot.
    I have the same Intel SSD on my desktop, and the Toolbox application works fine there.  Both are Win7-64 machines, and in device manager, both show the same Microsoft driver (6.1.7600.16385) and the same hardware ids for the drives. 
    Does anyone know if the Intel app works on a T510?

    I tried Intel’s online chat support and encountered a helpful tech who took me through updating drivers and trying a couple of other pieces of software.  It turns out that Intel’s Rapid Storage Technology applet sees the drive fine.  So does SSDLife Free, which assures me that my drive is in excellent health, should last until 2020, and has Trim enabled.  But even though no other app has a problem seeing the drive, and I have new drivers and an updated Lenovo bios in my T510, Intel SSD Toolbox still can’t see anything on my system.   For the moment, I’ll just live without Toolbox. 

  • [Review] Intel Atom 330 / Nvidia Ion based Media Center

    I thought some of you may be interested. I've just bought a Point of View Mobii ION Mini PC to build a media center.
    There are other Nvidia ION based Mini PCs available, but there are few points that made my choice for the Point of View one:
    - Intel Atom 330 (Dual Core)
    - Mini ITX
    - 2 GB RAM
    - 320 GB HDD
    - 1 Available PCI-Express Slot (hopefully a good DVB-S(2) TV Card with CI will be available soon)
    - SPDIF / Toslink Digital Audio Out
    - 8 USB Ports (6 Back, 2 Front)
    - HDMI Out (Thought that this would be important, but more on this later), DVI, VGA
    - No CPU or Motherboard Fan
    Additionally I bought a Keysonic ACK-540BT Bluetooth Keyboard with an integrated touchpad. I added 1 GB DDR2 RAM to the PC for a total of 3 GB.
    Arch Linux worked straight out of the box, but there are a few things to note:
    - The Intel Atom 330 does NOT support Intel Speedstep, therefore no frequency scaling is possible
    - I don't want a login manager, just a straight lxde Desktop with an autostarting XBMC, but Blueman (needed for autopairing with the bluetooth keyboard) needed a ck-launch-session to get access to the bluetooth dongle (took me a while to find this out)
    - XBMC supports VDPAU out of the box if you configure it, CPU usage when playing a movie is below 20%
    - I disconnected the hdd and power LED because they are quite bright (the cabinet I use for my equipment has a glass door)
    - The Mini PC is not hearable from 0.5 meters even when hdd is working
    - HDMI Output works flawless but my SONY LCD TV is not a Full HD one but has a native resolution of 1360x768. With HDMI I could only choose between 720p (1280x720) which is too small or 1080i (1920x1080) which would be too large. I now use a standard VGA DSUB cable and get a perfectly sharp 1360x768 resolution. No need for HDMI
    Just if anyone is interested:
    - glxgears: ~2400 fps
    hdparm -Tt /dev/sda
    /dev/sda:
    Timing cached reads: 1304 MB in 2.00 seconds = 651.94 MB/sec
    Timing buffered disk reads: 358 MB in 3.00 seconds = 119.22 MB/sec
    This is the perfect media center solution for me, capable of managing more than 15.000 mp3 and m4a, a bunch of divx videos and dvd isos, 10.000 photos and hundreds of shoutcast internet radio stations. All managable with a wireless keyboard and touchpad on my Sony LCD TV. Just the tv card is missing...
    Last edited by freigeist (2009-08-14 19:39:23)

    i am also working on my zotac-9300 itx. i also have the problem of get the right resolution. my tv was bought three years ago and i attached a hdmi cable to it in case some day (such as today) i will use it. however, the zotac hdmi does not work with the tv. either the tv does not detect the signal or the motherboard does not send the signal out. anyway, i use a dvi->hdmi adapter now. but the resolution is still not right. (will fix it later). the 9300 works great on h264, but somehow has trouble with the HD tv signal. although the cpu usage is low when playing those HD channels, but the frames are not smooth. i am using kaffeine to work tv. i am trying to get the vlc to work with vdpau (or vaapi) but has no luck. anyway, good to share our experience on htpc.
    ps. my board is using a internal power supply which give me some noise when the room is quiet, but it is ok when watching moives.

  • Intel SSD 530 startup problems on ThinkPad W520 - Bug in SSD or lack of BIOS support?

    The are problems with Intel SSD 530 and ThinkPad W520. Many people, including me, are complaining about startup problems ... see this thread also: https://communities.intel.com/thread/44258
    One month ago I bought an Intel SSD 530 240GB to replace the stock HDD of my ThinkPad W520 (4270CTO). When I cold-start the laptop everything is fine, but when I restart it from Windows 7 or even CTRL-ALT-DEL, the drive is not found. Both SSD and W520 has the latest firmware/BIOS.
    I had no problems with Intel SSD 335 240GB; Windows starts and restart without problem, but with the Intel 530 it fails when I do restart, the BIOS does not find it after a normal reset. I think BIOS implementation for W520 does not support the newer ATA feature called "Device Initiated Power Management (DIPM) for Software Setting Preservation (SSP)". There is a BIOS update for W530 but not for W520.
    Should I assume Intel SSD 530 is and will remain incompatible with ThinkPad W520 or wait for a BIOS update?
    W520 | i7-2720QM | NV Quadro 2000M

    I am also seeing the exact same issue. I have a ThinkPad W520 and a Corsair Force GS using a Sandforce 2200 series controller. According to the Intel SSD thread, there is some incompatibility between that controller and Intel QM77-chips which is causing the issue.
    The symptoms for my laptop are the same. SSD is always recognized on cold boot, but effectively never on warm boot / restart. Will we get a BIOS update that fixes this?
    I have dual boot configuration with both windows 8 and windows 7. The issue is happening regardless of what OS I issue the restart from.

  • Right, MacBook Pro 17" early 2011(Built March) and my new OCZ sata III 6G not working, when is Apple going to admit there is a problem with the Intel's 6 Series Chipset. In System Information it says "Link Speed: 6 Gigabit" which is sata III.

    My MacBook Pro 17" early 2011(built March) and my new OCZ sata III 6G are not working together, when is Apple going to admit there is a problem with the Intel's 6 Series Chipset. In System Information it says "Link Speed: 6 Gigabit" which is sata III and in my MacBook Pro it does not work. 
    Now MacBook Pro 17" early 2011 built May onward do not have this problem it was fixed in the Intel's 6 Series Chipset. (So there is a problem). Cam I have my MacBook Pro fixed please.

    After biting the bullet and ordering more RAM, my computer now is working a ton better. So that must have been the main issue. With 8 GB RAM, I can now even run Parallels fluidly (better than my work PC!) where before simple things like logging in to my MBP after reboot could take forever.
    The place I went to had several other people getting RAM upgrades at the same time as me, so between this and other comments I've seen in discussions here and elsewhere on the Internets, I take it to mean that either Apple should bump up the base RAM on its new machines, and/or stop charging so much for additional RAM.
    I refused to believe a Pro machine bought with Lion installed would come with too little RAM for light to medium usage, but it was apparently the case. I'll mark this as a correct answer and hope some other poor soul will come across this thread and be helped by it.

  • Intel SSD 530 240gb - 17" late 2011 Macbook Pro

    I was given a new in the bag Intel SSD 530 240gb
    I have a 17" late 2011 Macbook Pro..
    I can afford to buy another brand and sell this one online/ebay...
    Am I asking for problems installing and using this?  My laptop is the core of my business so I need stability.
    I have not only a timecapsul backup but also a daily copy clone to a internal hard drive in my MB too..
    If I choose not to use it is the general consensus Samsung the most Mac compatible.
    I'm in Bali and so warrantee follow up is a nightmare..
    Thanks in advance..

    I do not have experience with the Intel SSD's but I also heard of some problems (that you can solve with a firmware update, which is not easy to do).
    I would go for the lowest risk and buy Crucial SSD.
    Samsung is NOT the most compatible for Mac, it is as compatible as most other brands. The disadvantage in the Samsung SSD's is that it does not have the best diskcontroller. Crucial has the Marvell controller which is by far better.
    I have experience with Samsung, Crucial, Micron (same as Crucial), Mercure. They all work well, with the best experience with Crucial. About 10 MacbookPros upgraded to SSD.
    Lex

  • Z60T + INTEL SSD problem!

    Hi,
    I want to chance the old HAD from a Z60T to a Intel SSD.
    Notebook type: 2511-EJG
    SSD Model: SSDSA2M160G2GC
    I had cloned the dates from the old HDD with Acronis True Image Home 2010 to the Intel SSD.
    But after installing the SSD into the laptop the OS do not boot. I had contacted the lenovo telephone support but they can't help me to find the reason.
    After checking some theadsof this forum I have the idée it can bee a problem with the SATA1/ SATA2 respectively 1.5 Gb/sec / 3 Gb/sec media transfer rat compatibility.
    Is that the problem? And how can I fix it?
    Tanks and sorry for my bad English skills. I hope you still understand me.

    admindrey, welcome to the forum,
    please try cloning again, but this time with the SSD inserted in the primary hdd slot in your Z60. The original drive in an usb external enclosure and boot from an Acronis rescue cd you can create with Acronis.
    Let us know how you get on.
    Andy  ______________________________________
    Please remember to come back and mark the post that you feel solved your question as the solution, it earns the member + points
    Did you find a post helpfull? You can thank the member by clicking on the star to the left awarding them Kudos Please add your type, model number and OS to your signature, it helps to help you. Forum Search Option T430 2347-G7U W8 x64, Yoga 10 HD+, Tablet 1838-2BG, T61p 6460-67G W7 x64, T43p 2668-G2G XP, T23 2647-9LG XP, plus a few more. FYI Unsolicited Personal Messages will be ignored.
      Deutsche Community     Comunidad en Español    English Community Русскоязычное Сообщество
    PepperonI blog 

  • Intel SSD Firmware Update Tool ISO does not boot

    Hello everyone
    Yesterday I tried to install Mavericks on my MacBook Pro 13" 8,1 but I got stuck because I have an Intel SSD inside and it seems that MacOSX 10.8 doesn't have the right driver on board. So I downloaded the Intel SSD Firmware Update Tool 2.0.6 ISO, burned it on a CD with DiscUtility and tried to boot from it.
    The problem is that it doesn't boot from the CD. It just ends with the blinking/flashing question mark folder.
    Luckily I have a second MacBook Pro 13" 8,1 from work. Just out of couriosity I inserted the disk inside this MacBook and tried to boot from it.
    Everything went fine. I saw the Intel Firmware Updater etc.
    So now my question: What is going on with my first mac? Why does it NOT boot the CD?
    What I need to say at this point: I burned the CD with the MacBook from work. Could this be the reason?
    hope someone can help me
    Best Regards
    krebbl

    yes that's right. Unfortunatly I don't have a Windows PC.
    But like I said, my second MacBook Pro boots from this CD and shows me the firmware updater. My first MacBook with the Intel SSD does not.
    And like in the post here http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-57575091-263/intel-x25-ssd-incompatible-wit h-os-x-10.8.3/ it should be no problem.
    Are there other ways to boot an ISO file?

  • Lenonvo T440 with Intel SSD SC2BF240A4L - failing to install apps via SCCM 2012 task sequence

    Hi there
    Wondering if anyone else has encountered this issue with a T440 with Intel SSD hard disk.
    Our firm purchased two Lenovo T440 laptops. One has a magnetic hard disk, the other a SSD hard disk. Here are the models:
    SSD hard disk:           Intel SSDSC2BF240A4L
    Magnetic hard disk:   500Gb 7200rpm HTS725050A7E635
    We deploy our Windows 7 build via a SCCM 2012 task sequence.
    Building the T440 with the magnetic hard disk was trouble free. I built it repeatedly, and encountered no errors; our core applications installed successfully every time and the task sequence completed successfully every time.
    All well and good.
    Building the T440 with the Intel SSD hard disk has been frustrating. When I run the task sequence on this machine, 8 times out of 10 the task sequence will fail, either stopping abruplty at installing Oracle Single-Sign On or Appsense agents. When the task sequence fails it is ALWAYS at one of these two apps. 
    Frustratingly, sometimes the task sequence will complete successfully on this T440.
    Given we successfully deploy this task sequence to a variety of different hardware from different vendors, including other Lenovo laptops, I can only guess the Intel SSD hard disk is the culprit. 
    Has anyone encountred anything like this? I've went through the smsts.log file and other SCCM log files and can find nothing obvious. That this ONLY happens on the T440 with the SSD suggests to me the issues lies in that direction.
    I'll swap disks in either T440 to see if the other T440 fails also with the SSD aboard, to see what happens.
    Meantime if anyone has any information about this issue I'd be grateful if you coud share.
    Thanks
    CT

    Does the install provide any logging? Does execmgr.log show any other info?
    Per the readme, it should be setup.exe.
    http://download.lenovo.com/ibmdl/pub/pc/pccbbs/mobiles/girc15ww.txt
    Unattended Install
    This is for system administrators' use only.
    1. Refer to the Manual Install section, and download and extract the file.
    2. In the step 11 of the Installing files section, uncheck the checkbox next
    to "Install ..... now", and then select Finish to cancel installation.
    3. At the command line, execute Setup.exe with the -s option.
    Example: [Path where the files were extracted]\Setup -s
    Daniel Ratliff | http://www.PotentEngineer.com

  • Intel SSD in MacBook Pro

    Hi everyone,
    I have a Macbook Pro 15, mid-2009. I put a SSD in it. However, it's getting slow gradually. My question is how to restore the Intel SSD performance like brand-new. Please as specific as possible, thank you.

    How long have you had the drive?
    How hard do you use it?
    How do you know its slower – through everyday usage or through benchmark tests?
    This is the issue with SSDs - they slow down over time. Its the way they store and then remove data. Basically, when you delete something, its marked as deleted but not actually removed from the disk. Hence, next time you write data to them particular memory blocks, it needs to wipe the old data and replace it with the new, which takes a little more time.
    There is a feature called TRIM, which basically runs when the drive is idle, and sets about 'cleaning up' the disk so that its ready to be written on, and hence faster.
    However, firstly your SSD must support TRIM, and your OS must also support TRIM. Currently the only OS that supports TRIM is Windows 7, unfortunately. It seems that with the recent 10.4.6 update, TRIM support is being added to Snow Leopard as it is listed in the system properties, but its not actually 'switched on' yet. Maybe Apple haven’t quite got the full functionality going yet......
    SSDs come with an ‘Indilinx’ controller built into them. This is a slightly older controller, which needs TRIM since, as you’ve noticed, the drive tends to slow down over time.
    However, newer, and more expensive SSDs, are being released with a new ‘SandForce’ controller. There is secrecy around how this controller works, but its reported to do the TRIM feature on-the-fly – so it doesn’t suffer from slow down issues. I have a Vertex 2 SSD, which has the SandForce controller, and although I haven’t had it very long, its as fast as when I first installed it, and it should stay very close to this speed, as other people who have SandForce drives have noticed with their benchmarks.
    The only way to speed up you drive to how it was when new, at the moment, is to use a tool to perform a clean reformat (a normal format wont do). You’ll need to search Google for a tool that does this with SSDs as I haven’t looked into any. The downside is that you obviously need to reinstall everything from scratch afterwards – hence it comes down to whether you can be bother to go through the procedure. Your SSD should still be much faster then a HDD even in its ‘slow state’.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2458214

Maybe you are looking for