ASA 5510 Network address translation through an internal network.

Is it possible to perform static Nat's through an internal network?
Here's my situation I have a ASA 5510 with a public outside interface (let’s call it 68.68.68.1), and I have an inside private IP address (192.168.1.2/24). The inside IP address leads to a 4900m with that interface being configured with a 192.168.1.1 (no switching). On the 4900 M I have several VLANs one of them is an internal DMZ of sorts. (192.168.2.0/24). Within this DMZ network are several Web servers which need to be associated a public IP address (68.68.68.x).
Every time I configure a static Nat to associating a public IP address with an internal IP address within the DMZ, packet Tracer on the ASA informs me that the packet gets dropped at the static Nat and I cannot figure out why this is so.
Safe it to say my question still stands is it possible to Nat (68.68.68.222 to and 92.168.2.60) given the configuration above, and how would I go about configuring in such the manner above so that I acn apply static nat through the 192.168.1.0 network to reach the 192.168.2.0 network.
Any help on this matter is greatly appreciated. Thank you.

more information as requested
csc# sh int ip br
Interface                  IP-Address      OK? Method Status                Protocol
Ethernet0/0                192.168.1.2   YES CONFIG up                    up
Ethernet0/1                172.16.2.3      YES CONFIG up                    up
Ethernet0/2                192.168.12.1    YES CONFIG up                    up
Ethernet0/3                68.68.68.1   YES CONFIG up                    up
Internal-Control0/0        127.0.1.1       YES unset up                    up
Internal-Data0/0           unassigned      YES unset up                    up
Management0/0              192.168.19.1    YES manual administratively down down
csc-ssm# sh nameif
Interface                Name                     Security
Ethernet0/0              inside                   100
Ethernet0/1              %^&*%$                   100
Ethernet0/2              @#$%&*()                  30
Ethernet0/3              outside                    0
Management0/0            management               100
nat (inside) 0 access-list nat0
nat (inside) 1 serverNET 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 1 Server 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 1 192.168.8.0 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 1 CorpVPN 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 1 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0
nat (Eng) 0 access-list ENG_nat0_outbound
nat (Eng) 1 172.16.2.0 255.255.255.0
nat (WiFi-Guest) 1 192.168.12.0 255.255.255.0
global (ENG) 2 172.16.2.10-172.16.2.50 netmask 255.255.255.0
global (outside) 1 interface

Similar Messages

Tuxedo and Network Address Translation(NAT) at Firewall

We made a sucessful connection through the firewall without Network Address Translation
(NAT)on the firewall, from one network to the other and what we found happened
was that the client machine makes a connection on port 8090 and then sets up a
successful connection to the server (WSL).The client then very soon afterward
makes another connection on
another high-port and everything works (WSH connection).
Whats not happening with NAT is that the second connection is not being made to
the firewall. The firewall and the router are not blocking the call. It is just
not being made.
Thanking you in advance!!!
Nathaniel

Nathaniel,
Take a look at the WSL -H option at
http://edocs.bea.com/tuxedo/tux80/atmi/rf540.htm#1534543
Regards,
Peter.
Got a Question? Ask BEA at http://askbea.bea.com
The views expressed in this posting are solely those of the author, and BEA
Systems, Inc. does not endorse any of these views.
BEA Systems, Inc. is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of
the
information provided
and assumes no duty to correct, expand upon, delete or update any of the
information contained in this posting.
Nathaniel Sebolai wrote:
We made a sucessful connection through the firewall without Network Address Translation
(NAT)on the firewall, from one network to the other and what we found happened
was that the client machine makes a connection on port 8090 and then sets up a
successful connection to the server (WSL).The client then very soon afterward
makes another connection on
another high-port and everything works (WSH connection).
Whats not happening with NAT is that the second connection is not being made to
the firewall. The firewall and the router are not blocking the call. It is just
not being made.
Thanking you in advance!!!
Nathaniel

GC 11G AND Network Address Translation

HI,
I have simple question , Is Network Address Translation supported with GC 11g. I know it is not on 9i.
thanks.

I can't find anything on this on the internet. So creating a SR is an option.
The only note I found was: Agent Fails to Upload Through Load Balancer, Secures Successfully [ID 1149610.1] suggesting you can use NAT.
Eric

Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CG-NAT)

Hello,
I live in the UK. One of the largest ISPs, BT, has begun trialling carrier grade network address translation (CG-NAT). In a nutshell, this introduces double NAT - first your broadband router, then the ISP's "router". This is before the ISP has introduced IPv6.
I fear it is only a matter of time before my ISP also introduces CG-NAT. Will/does Skype work in a CG-NAT scenario? If not, what are my options?
Kind regards,
Anwar

I am new to Oracle VM. The dom0 and domU are set up by someone else. So I don't know the details. In the domU, I can't even ping the 10.244.69.35 address of the dom0.
# ping 10.244.69.35
PING 10.244.69.35 (10.244.69.35) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 192.168.200.50 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.200.50 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.200.50 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
The Cisco switch on the 10.*.*.* network is owned by IT and I can't change anything on it. This is why I try to set up NAT on the dom0. I would appreciate any help so that I can access the 10.*.*.* network from the domU.

Network Address Translation, Automatic Port Forwarding

Does the Airport Extreme do
Network Address Translation? Do I have to do something to make NAT functional?
Does the Airport Extreme automatically forward ports? Or is this something I have to do manually
sorry if this is discussed already but a Search of Forum did did not yield the information I need.

Hi Barbara, welcome to the discussion area!
+Does the Airport Extreme do Network Address Translation?+
Yes
+Do I have to do something to make NAT functional?+
No, if you have the device configured as a router with the Connection Sharing settings set to Share a public IP address so that the AirPort Extreme is handling the chore of assigning IP addresses to connected devices.
If you have the AirPort Extreme configured as a "bridge", then NAT is handled by the router that is upstream of the AirPort Extreme.
+Does the Airport Extreme automatically forward ports? Or is this something I have to do manually+
Port forwarding must be setup manually on the AirPort Extreme using AirPort Utility, the application used to setup the AirPorts.

How do I disable Network Address Translator on my macbook?

I am getting a notice that Back to my Mac will not work because I have more than one device on my network providing NAT (network address translation). It says to try disabling NAT on one of the devices. How do you do that?

Airport Extreme needs to be in Bridge Mode.
Here: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1208

On UPnP and NAT (Network Address Translation)

Why UPnP is an often asked Question.
This article goes a long way to say why.
A couple of Quotes
*What is UPnP?*
Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) is an architecture for pervasive peer-to-peer network connectivity of PCs and intelligent devices or appliances, particularly within the home. UPnP builds on Internet standards and technologies, such as TCP/IP, HTTP, and XML, to enable these devices to automatically connect with one another and work together to make networking - particularly home networking - possible for more people.
*Are there other ways to solve the problem of NAT traversal? If so, why is using UPnP the best choice?*
Yes, there are other ways to solve this problem, but no other mechanism currently exists as an industry standard to address this problem in an automatic way for the consumer and in such a universally-applicable way for the developer.
Simply Automated Starter Package
Other approaches require either manual intervention by the user or they require special development efforts by the Internet gateway device vendor and the software developer to handle the NAT traversal needs of specific applications. As a result, UPnP is uniquely able to solve this important problem.
*Consumer does the work.* The manual intervention methods of NAT traversal require a consumer to use a browser, a graphical user interface-based tool on the PC, or a command line interface tool on the PC to change some settings on the Internet gateway device in the home. While some technical enthusiast users have little difficulty with this, many consumers do not feel comfortable doing this. Further, many consumers may not even realize that NAT traversal problems are interfering with their use of services across the Internet. _The user may be attempting to play a multi-player game or engage in some other peer-to-peer service but find he or she cannot connect for some reason._ This leads to troubleshooting, support calls, customer dissatisfaction, and reluctance on the part of the user to try new services or experiences in the future.
*Developer does the work.* To avoid requiring the consumer to solve this NAT traversal problem manually, some Internet gateway device vendors have written and included application layer gateway support into their devices. This application layer gateway software is designed with specific applications in mind. In other words, the device vendor writes and tests specific code that will automatically enable one application to go through the NAT. If the application software is updated, the application layer code the device vendor wrote may have to be updated and tested again. This one-at-a-time way of chasing the NAT traversal problem is manageable for device vendors when there are only a few peer-to-peer or relevant applications to consider, but this approach does not scale well to 100s or 1000s of applications, can be very expensive to pursue, and likely requires specific knowledge of how each of these applications function. The better way to approach this problem is to have the device vendor add software or firmware to their device once to understand UPnP and have other devices and software be able to communicate with the NAT device using this same technology. UPnP is uniquely able to fulfill this role today.
I have underlined a passage in the last.
I hope this helps in some way.
6:58 PM Tuesday; January 1, 2008

          Look for bindAddr in the weblogic.properties doc.
          weblogic.system.bindAddr
          You can use a dns name instead of an ip address
          Mike
          David Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
          >We are planning to add a client that needs to access our weblogic cluster
          >through firewalls with IP address translation. According to the WebLogic
          >(5.1) documentation, this could be done by opening port 7001 in the
          >firewalls, and BIND WebLogic SERVER INSTANCES TO DNS NAMES. Does anyone
          >know how to bind WebLogic server instances to DNS names? Should it be
          >done in weblogic.properties?Thanks in advance,David [email protected]

Making internet sharing work (Issue with Network Address Translation)

Trying to use internet sharing to enable a BluRay player to get access to the internet for firmware updates, BDLive, etc.
MacBook Pro is setup with Airport (en1) enabled and connected to the internet.
Ethernet port (en2) is set to "Configure IPv4: Off."
I have configured the /etc/bootpd.plist file with the following configuration as mentioned in http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20071223001432304&query=xbox%2B360.
<key>replythresholdseconds</key>
<integer>0</integer>
After starting up Internet Sharing, the following is observed:
Ethernet port(en2) is reporting 192.168.2.1 as its IP address in Network Utility but not in the Network System Preferences Pane.
The Mac is responding to the DHCP request from the BluRay player and the BluRay is assigned an IP address of 192.168.2.2/24 with a default gateway and DNS of 192.168.2.1.
So you think there would be success with this but wrong. The system log is reporting that NATD "failed to write packet back (No route to host)" or "failed to write packet back (Host is down) and the connection test on the BluRay player is consistently failing.
Even manually configuring the ethernet port on the Mac is resulting in failure. Is there something else I'm overlooking?
Hoping someone can spread some light on this. Thanks.

Ashy Larry wrote:
So you were able to get it to work then?
I ask because I want to get the Sony BDP-N460 Bluray player for my parents, as it's the only Sony player aside from the Playstation 3 that is Netflix capable. I'm not sure why their other wi-fi enabled player doesn't have Netflix on it. I suppose I could get them a Playstation 3, but they don't really need one.
More than likely that Sony is positioning its products that way so people do go for the PS3 and increase it install base and possibly get you to by a game or two.
I want to connect the player to an old iBook G3 that's running 10.4 and share its connection. I did this successfully with the iBook and my Xbox 360 and wanted to know if it was possible to do so with a Bluray player.
I would bet that you will be able to accomplish this if you were able to get a 360 running through it. Just ignore the Blu-Ray player's test connection tool and try to connect to Netflix. Just play it safe and buy it through a retailer like Amazon where returns are hassle free.

How to disable Network Address Translation

how to disable Network Address Translation

Hi KalaiArasu.K,
As Chen V said, please tell us more detailed information about your requirement.
In addition, please refer to the two following links to learn how to disable Network and computer from Explorer Navigation Pane:
How to Add or Remove Network from the Windows 7 Navigation Pane
http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/39699-network-add-remove-navigation-pane.html
How to Remove “Computer” from Windows 7 Explorer Navigation Pane?
http://www.askvg.com/how-to-remove-computer-from-windows-7-explorers-navigation-pane/
Note: Since the website is not hosted by Microsoft, the link may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this information. What’s more, incorrectly editing the registry
may severely damage your system. Before making changes to the registry, you should back up any valued data.
For your infomation, plase refer to the following article to learn how to configure a Registry Item via GPO:
Configure a Registry Item
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753092.aspx
Regards,
Lany Zhang

ASA 5510 Spanish Language Translation

Hi,
I am trying to add language translation for both SSL Web VPN and AnyConnect to Spanish. I have found a translation toolkit for Japanese and French, but no other languages. It seems the toolkit has all messages translated from English to the other language in various files. Does anyone know how I can get the translations for all msgids or do I have to have a Spanish friend? Any help would be appreciated.
Daniel

jfmotta1, welcome to Apple Discussions.
There are some translate widgets for Mac, but they seem to be for a newer OS X version. I've used (via copy/paste) these sites for translation.
http://babelfish.yahoo.com/
http://translate.google.com/translate_t?hl=en&sl=es&tl=en#
 Cheers, Tom
(='.'=)
(")_(")

Network Address Translation in Java

Hi to all,
Can any one explain me if is possible to realize a NAT in java?!?
Are RFC's 3022 and 1918 useful for my purposes?!?
If it's possible, can anyone post the code or the link where I can find it?!?
Thanks...

To do NAT properly you need lower level access to the IP stack than Java provides. There are also a good variety of NAT servers available.
A good open source choice is Linux IPMasquerade. You can use an old surplus PC (pentium II 233 or better) with Linux and IPMasquerade and IPChains to build a quite respectable firewall and NAT server that is more secure than anything running under windows. I got over 100,000 hits on google for ip masquerade, eg. http://en.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO.
Another choice is if you use a Linksys DSL router or similar device, this will connect you to cable or ADSL and do NAT for you. The router is less than $50.00 US.
Given these conditions a NAT in java is hardly worth it.

ASA 5510 in Transparent Mode-Guidelines.

Dear all,
I need to convert routed mode to transparent mode on my ASA-5510 with inbuilt IPS.
let me know which of the following features configured on my firewall will have issue if converted to transparent mode:
1. static routes.
2. object-groups.
3. ACLS.
4. URL-filter (Websense).
5. IPS . ( i doubt this )
6. have 3 data and 1 Mgmt interfaces.
7. syslog.
8. SNMP
I'm sure point 5 and 6 will have issues, need to confirm.
need to confirm this by EOD,
( 5 hours more).
thanks in advance.
Shukla.

Does not participate in routing protocols but can still pass routing protocol traffic through it. You can define static routes for the traffic originated by the ASA.
in transparante mode the devices dehind and infront of the firewall will be in the same ip subnet as the firewall will be a L2 device!!
ACLs can be configured normally
syslog as well
obgect groups as well
Address translation is inherent when a firewall is configured for routed mode. Beginning with
ASA 8.0, address translation can be used in transparent mode as well
Does not participate in multicast. However, it allows passing the multicast traffic through it using the ACLs.
Does not support QoS.
Inspects Layer 2 and higher packet headers
as long as u can use
policy-map global_policy
then u can integrate with IPS if u mean AIP-ssm modul
transparent also known as a Layer 2 firewall or a stealth firewall, because its
interfaces have no IP addresses and cannot be detected or manipulated. Only a single
management address can be configured on the firewall
In transparent mode, a firewall can support only two interfaces-the inside and the outside. If
your firewall supports more than two interfaces from a physical and licensing standpoint, you
can assign the inside and outside to two interfaces arbitrarily. As soon as those interfaces are
configured, the firewall does not permit a third interface to be configured.
Some platforms also support a dedicated management interface, which can be used for all
firewall management traffic. However, the management interface cannot be involved in
accepting or inspecting user traffic
Configure a management address:
Firewall(config)# ip address ip_address subnet_mask
The firewall can support only a single IP address for management purposes. The address is
not bound to an interface, as in routed mode. Rather, it is assigned to the firewall itself,
accessible from either of the bridged interfaces.
The management address is used for all types of firewall management traffic, such as Telnet,
SSH, HTTP, SNMP, Syslog, TFTP, FTP, and so on.
A transparent firewall can also support multiple security contexts. In that case, interface IP
addresses must be configured from the respective context. The system execution space uses
the admin context interfaces and IP addresses for its management traffic
You do not have to configure a static route for the subnet directly connected to the firewall
interfaces. However, you should define one static route as a default route toward the outside
public network
i wish i covered all ur questions
good luck
if helpful Rate

ASA 5510 Guest Internet Access

I have a subnet for guest network access, both wired and wireless. We have a Netgear ProSafe that is trunked to a Cisco 2901 performing 'Router-on-a-Stick'. For most internal traffic, it all stays behind the ASA. But for guest traffic, I have a route-map that sets the next-hop address as the outside interface of the ASA. The question is, how can I still permit those users to access our internal DNS servers? Do I need any particular NAT translations, exemptions, DNS doctoring, hairpinning, etc.? I have an ACL on the inside interface that permits traffic from the guest networks to our internal DNS servers, and then the next ACL line denies any other traffic from the guest networks to any of our internal networks.
Regards,
Scott

Hello Scott,
Your ASA will need to have a route for both networks
You also will need the following command:
-same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
The thing is that the packets from the guest vlan will go directly to the ASA as its default gateway, then packets will be routed to the Router on stick and finally to the DNS server, the reply will go from the DNS to the Router on stick and then directly to the Guest user.
Nat exemption will look like this:
access-list nonat permit ip 192.168.14.0 255.255.255.0 host 192.168.11.6
access-list nonat permit ip 192.168.14.0 255.255.255.0 host 192.168.11.4
nat (inside) 0 access-list nonat
Please give it a try, also please provide packet tracer
packet-tracer input inside udp 192.168.14.10 1025 192.168.11.4 53
Regards,
Julio
Rate helpful posts

Sticky load balancing not working because of Address Translation

          This came up before - see below. I don't understand what the
          soltion is/was.
          WL Server puts it's ip address in the WebLogicSession cookie
          which is an internal address 192.168.201.41
          WL proxy knows WL Server only by an external address like 139.141.38.21. Since
          it does not know of any WLS with an IP
          address of 192.168.201.41, it round-robins the request instead
          of sending it to the primary WLS.
          Any help is much appreciated.
          Mike Reiche
          Robert Patrick <[email protected]> wrote:
          >Hi,
          >
          >A very typical configuration is to put the web server in the DMZ (i.e.,
          >between
          >an outer and inner firewall) and proxy the requests from the web server
          >to the
          >WebLogic server (which sits behind the inner firewall). Since all of
          >these
          >proxied requests use HTTP and a single port, the only port that needs
          >to be
          >opened in the inner firewall is an HTTP port (the outer firewall will
          >only need
          >an HTTP and/or HTTPS port opened).
          >
          >Hope this helps,
          >Robert
          >
          >Eytan Ben-Meir wrote:
          >
          >> Thanks Patrick,
          >>
          >> May be you can suggest options for securing a WLS behind a firewall?
          >>
          >> Thanks again,
          >>
          >> Eytan
          >>
          >> Robert Patrick wrote:
          >>
          >> > Hi,
          >> >
          >> > The problem is that we encode location information (e.g., IP address(es))
          >> > in the session id. If the plugin sees a session id, it decodes the
          >> > session id to find out where to route the request (i.e., which server
          >in
          >> > the cluster contains the HttpSession object for that session). Since
          >the
          >> > plugin cannot find the machine whose IP address is encoded in the
          >session
          >> > id (because of the network address translation), this will not work.
          > In
          >> > general, distributed application software needs to be modified to
          >be
          >> > capable of handling network address translation -- to my knowledge,
          >> > WebLogic Server has not been modified to support this feature (though
          >the
          >> > Enterprise version of the product has had this support for years).
          >> >
          >> > Hope this helps,
          >> > Robert
          >> >
          >> > Eytan Ben-Meir wrote:
          >> >
          >> > > Hi,
          >> > >
          >> > > Configuration:
          >> > > WLS 4.5.1 on Solaris 2.7 inside a firewall.
          >> > > SonicWall firewall with NAT (Network Address Translation).
          >> > > Netscape Enterprise Server 4.0 outside the firewall with Weblogic
          >> > > NSAPI-BRIDGE (sp 5)
          >> > >
          >> > > The problem:
          >> > > When a browser request is sent to the NE web-erver (directed to
          >the
          >> > > firewall who then redirects to a Weblogic servlet).
          >> > > IF The servlet creates a httpsession (with or without cookies)
          >the
          >> > > request fails (the firewall blocks a request directed directly
          >at the
          >> > > non-routable ip address of the Weblogic machine inside the firewall.
          >> > > IF on the other hand the servlet does not create a http session,
          >all
          >> > > works fine.??????????
          >> > > Does any body know something about this????
          >> > >
          >> > > Thanks,
          >> > >
          >> > > Eytan
          >


          This isn't my problem.
          "Mike Reiche" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >
          >This came up before - see below. I don't understand what the
          >soltion is/was.
          >
          >WL Server puts it's ip address in the WebLogicSession cookie
          > which is an internal address 192.168.201.41
          >
          >WL proxy knows WL Server only by an external address like 139.141.38.21.
          > Since
          >it does not know of any WLS with an IP
          >address of 192.168.201.41, it round-robins the request instead
          >of sending it to the primary WLS.
          >
          >Any help is much appreciated.
          >
          >Mike Reiche
          >
          >Robert Patrick <[email protected]> wrote:
          >>Hi,
          >>
          >>A very typical configuration is to put the web server in the DMZ (i.e.,
          >>between
          >>an outer and inner firewall) and proxy the requests from the web server
          >>to the
          >>WebLogic server (which sits behind the inner firewall). Since all of
          >>these
          >>proxied requests use HTTP and a single port, the only port that needs
          >>to be
          >>opened in the inner firewall is an HTTP port (the outer firewall will
          >>only need
          >>an HTTP and/or HTTPS port opened).
          >>
          >>Hope this helps,
          >>Robert
          >>
          >>Eytan Ben-Meir wrote:
          >>
          >>> Thanks Patrick,
          >>>
          >>> May be you can suggest options for securing a WLS behind a firewall?
          >>>
          >>> Thanks again,
          >>>
          >>> Eytan
          >>>
          >>> Robert Patrick wrote:
          >>>
          >>> > Hi,
          >>> >
          >>> > The problem is that we encode location information (e.g., IP address(es))
          >>> > in the session id. If the plugin sees a session id, it decodes
          >the
          >>> > session id to find out where to route the request (i.e., which server
          >>in
          >>> > the cluster contains the HttpSession object for that session).
          >Since
          >>the
          >>> > plugin cannot find the machine whose IP address is encoded in the
          >>session
          >>> > id (because of the network address translation), this will not work.
          >> In
          >>> > general, distributed application software needs to be modified to
          >>be
          >>> > capable of handling network address translation -- to my knowledge,
          >>> > WebLogic Server has not been modified to support this feature (though
          >>the
          >>> > Enterprise version of the product has had this support for years).
          >>> >
          >>> > Hope this helps,
          >>> > Robert
          >>> >
          >>> > Eytan Ben-Meir wrote:
          >>> >
          >>> > > Hi,
          >>> > >
          >>> > > Configuration:
          >>> > > WLS 4.5.1 on Solaris 2.7 inside a firewall.
          >>> > > SonicWall firewall with NAT (Network Address Translation).
          >>> > > Netscape Enterprise Server 4.0 outside the firewall with Weblogic
          >>> > > NSAPI-BRIDGE (sp 5)
          >>> > >
          >>> > > The problem:
          >>> > > When a browser request is sent to the NE web-erver (directed to
          >>the
          >>> > > firewall who then redirects to a Weblogic servlet).
          >>> > > IF The servlet creates a httpsession (with or without cookies)
          >>the
          >>> > > request fails (the firewall blocks a request directed directly
          >>at the
          >>> > > non-routable ip address of the Weblogic machine inside the firewall.
          >>> > > IF on the other hand the servlet does not create a http session,
          >>all
          >>> > > works fine.??????????
          >>> > > Does any body know something about this????
          >>> > >
          >>> > > Thanks,
          >>> > >
          >>> > > Eytan
          >>
          >

Someone outside of my network is printing through my wireless

Someone outside of my home network is printing through my wireless network. I have an HPb210e. How do Iadjust the printer settings to stop this?
Thank you

Are you using the printer as a standalone device or is it associated with an wireless access point?
Follow the instructions on this document to change the security type to WPA if you have it set up using WEP. Change the network key as well.
WEP is the currrently weakest security type available. It is very easy for anyone who is so inclined, to crack it and get your passphrase.
Best regards,
erico
****Please click on Accept As Solution if a suggestion solves your problem. It helps others facing the same problem to find a solution easily****
2015 Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience Consumer

ASA 5510 Network address translation through an internal network.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for