ASCP: Lot for Lot at item level.

Hi All,
In ASCP plan we can enable lot for lot but do we have the same option at Item-org level.
I don't want ASCP to aggregate the planned orders for some of the items in the plan.
Regards
RS

Sorry - there is no way to selectively disable lot-for-lot for some items.
It is all or none.

Similar Messages

WBS element for Sales Order Item level

Hi gurus,
I am trying to create an inbound idoc for sales order ' VA01'. I need to populate WBS element in the item level under Account Assignment Tab. I am using ORDERS05 basic type. Please help to find which segment to use for WBS element. Waiting for your reply. Please help.
Regards,
Satyajit
Edited by: Satyajit Saha on Feb 22, 2008 1:24 AM

Hi gurus,
I am trying to create an inbound idoc for sales order ' VA01'. I need to populate WBS element in the item level under Account Assignment Tab. I am using ORDERS05 basic type. Please help to find which segment to use for WBS element. Waiting for your reply. Please help.
Regards,
Satyajit
Edited by: Satyajit Saha on Feb 22, 2008 1:24 AM

Screen BADI for MIRO/FB60 item level field addition

Hi,
I need to add 'Material Group" (MATKL) field in item level similar GL Account. Material group will appear like GL account column in FB60/ MIRO screen ( GL posting).
I want to do without modification with help screen BADI.
Anyone, can suggest which BADI's method / User Exit can allow to add 'MATKL' field screen?
regards,
Rahul Mandale

Dear Rahul,
Please check IMG path :
Material management>Logistic Invoice verification>incoming invoice-->Maintain item list variant.
Or use Tcode SHD0, enter transaction Code MIRO and create a screen variant.
You can create your own screen variant , Untick the invisible check box for material group.
Regards,
w1n

Sales order condition change for Header and Item level..

Hi Gurus,
My requirement is as below..
Business wants to create new sales order from reference.. While creating slaes order fron reference , need to populate header/Item level condition tab data from originally paid by the invoice for that refence sales order not from refence sales order condition price.
I would like to how to bring this one, any user exit or copy control and any VOFm routine need to populate this kind of requirement.
Any one have any idea please let me know.. It very urgent, give reward points for right solution..
thanks,

Hi,
Here are the answers to your question
> Is it possible to add/change condition types on the sales order (header and item level) for which invoice has been created already?
I mean is it possible to add some surcharge condition to already invoiced order and than as result debit memo?
The answer is No. You cannot add or change the condition once it is invoiced.
> And one more question : Are there some time restrictions when debit/credit memo can be created? (I believe not, but I would like to have this confirmed, as I am not SD expert.)
The answer is No again. There is no time restriction and you can create debit or credit memo immediately when the invoice is released to accounting.
Hope this helps
Thanks
Mukund S

USER STATUS For Inquiry at Item level in VA12.

Dear Sir/Madam,
In Customer Inquiry we have maintained User Status at item level as 10,20,30,40 as radiaobutton.
Now we have to trigger event to initiate workflow as User changes User status from 10 to 20 like that.Currently
if user changes status from 10 to 20 in VA12 we get BO BUS2030 & Event 'Change'.
But we unable to trace exact changed status of that item in that particular Inquiry numbers.
1.All such user status are stored in JESt table but its get updated only after save button.So if i also try to use User exit to trigger Event
but i am unable to get Run time values of JEST table (USER STATUS).
2.If i go for BSVW (STATUS MGT ), in that we have 'VBK-SALES Header' & 'VBP-SALES ITEM' status present.But we have maintained User status at item level
so if we use 'VBP' then we didn't get BUS2030 BO & in Header 'VBK' we get BUS2030 but its at header level..so its didn,t give us item level status.
So Pease suggest me some way to handle such situation.
Thanks.

So what is your problem? You are not able to trace for which item the event got triggered?
I think you can make use of Change document table CDPOS and CDHDR to check which item had a latest change in status and accordingly incorporate this info in Workflow.
Thnaks
Arghadip

ALV - Layout for header and item level data

Experts,
A program extracts complete sales order details (including item level data) in ALV format. Now, during display, if anyone changes the layout to have only header level fields, I would like the duplicate records created by item data to go away. Would you know how to accomplish this?
Any help would be rewarded with points.
UV

Hello,
You can do it instead of adding a button on the ALV, on the selection screen add a radiobutton asking what information is required.
Header Information
Detailed Information
Or something like that
Bye
Gabriel P

Exit/bAdI for changing the item level field in VA02.

Dear Guruss...
I am facing a problem while trying toi change the account assignment group in VA02. The field is present at the iteem level in the tab BILLING.
When I change the field by choosing one of the values provided in the search help and enter, the value is again reset to its initial value. However if I change the value and SAVE (without pressing enter) then the value is saved.
The technical field name is VBAP-KTGRM, I have checked in the include:MV45AFZZ by putting break-points at all the forms but unfortunately none of them is getting triggered when I press enter.
During the debugging I found tha the values of the structure VBAP are overwritten by those of XVBAP everytime I press enter.
I also checked for the bAdI but can not get any help.
Is there any bAdI or exit that can help me for this????
Thanks in Advance......
Abhi.....

Hi Digvijay
   these are some of the enhancements/badi's which is related to t-code va02. just check it out
Transaction Code -               VA02          Change Sales Order
     Enhancement/ Business Add-in               Description
     Enhancement
     V60F0001               SD Billing plan (customer enhancement) diff. to billing plan
     V46H0001               SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
     V45W0001               SD Service Management: Forward Contract Data to Item
     V45S0004               Effectivity type in sales order
     V45S0003               MRP-relevance for incomplete configuration
     V45S0001               Update sales document from configuration
     V45P0001               SD customer function for cross-company code sales
     V45L0001               SD component supplier processing (customer enhancements)
     V45E0002               Data transfer in procurement elements (PRreq., assembly)
     V45E0001               Update the purchase order from the sales order
     V45A0004               Copy packing proposal
     V45A0003               Collector for customer function modulpool MV45A
     V45A0002               Predefine sold-to party in sales document
     V45A0001               Determine alternative materials for product selection
     SDTRM001               Reschedule schedule lines without a new ATP check
     SDAPO001               Activating Sourcing Subitem Quantity Propagation
      Business Add-in
     BADI_SD_SCH_GETWAGFZ               Scheduling Agreement: Read WAGFZ from S073
     BADI_SD_V46H0001               SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
Regards
Zulfikhar ali
Edited by: Zulfikhar Ali Bhutto.N on Sep 23, 2011 11:15 AM

WMTA for deliveries at Item Level or header level?

Hi experts,
I have configured output type WMTA for auto TO creation for delivery items. I have added the o/p type to the Output determination procedure, assigned the o/p determination procedure to delivery header type. WMTA is not being triggered automatically upon delivery creation(even if the item is relevant for WM picking), Just wondering if I need to assign the o/p determination to the delivery item type. Please let me know your suggestions.
Thanks
Kris T

You should go to the the determination analysing to check what happens.
In output screen -> Menu bar -> goto -> Determin.analysis
You can see what happens when system determin WMTO output.
If the message is 540, it means that systme cannot find output condition record.
You can check what value system is using to search the condition record (in access deatils). You can check whether you have maintain the condition record correctly.

Block the Material at Item level in Sales Order automatically for delivery

Hi!
My business scenario needs a material to be Ckecked for Inspection after raising the Sales Order by thirdparty person. So, I need to block that particular material at Item level automatically for delivery and rest of the line items can get delivered. I can do this by selecting the reason for Block at Item level manually, but I want the system to get detemine this block. And one more thing is that there is NO Quality Management module for this. So, let me know what I need to configure for this effect. Thank you.....

hi,
pl check the user exit " userexit_save_document_prepare" or "userexit_save_document".
Take the help of your abaper to see if the logic written here can affect the item level block in the sales order for inspection. Create new reason for the item level block and have it triggered with this exit. Instead of hard coding which might require regular intervention of abaper for code changes for the business to be able to manage it, maintain a master data in the material master against some field with a key.
now use that key to identify if these materials require to be blocked at the sales order level for inspection. To release this item again the user has to go in VA02 mode to release the block. Let this be done after the inspection of that material.
regards
sadhu kishore

Delivery address at Item Level and not at the Header Level

Hello Experts,
We are facing an issue as described below:-
We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
for all the Item Levels.
However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
RKS

It is standard process only.
In Po delivery address is maintained at item level because to which address perticular material to be delivered,
this may change from material to material or may not change

How to limit the rows in the item level in sales order

hi
i have created a sales order here my requirement is in item level there are so many line items i want to limit the line items to 5 num is it possible

Dear chandra
In billing it is possible. But if you want in sale order, apply user exit in program MV45AFZB - USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAP.
This user exit can be used to carry out additional checks (e.g. for completion) at item level.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

SRM 7.0 - Configure Field Control for Shopping Cart Item Overview

Hi,
I am able to hide fields in the shopping item details using the "Configure Control for Fields on Item Level" node in the IMG.
However, this same configuration does not seem to work for fields that are in the item overview of the shopping cart. Any advice on how/why this seems to work differently?
I do want to hide fields via config, not as an end-user.
Thanks!
Matt

Hello Matt,
You will find this useful.
https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700001969972008E.pdf
Thanks
Ashutosh

Multiple sales representitive in Sales order item level

Hi all,
I have multiple sales representitives in Customer Master, eg: 1000 & 1001.
when I create SO, i choose 1000 for the sales representitive in Sales order header level, now for item 0010, i need to add in 1001 as another sales representitive , therefore i could have 2 sales representatives for my SO item level.
But when i add another partner function for sales representitive fir this 1001, system prompt me error for this : Partner function AF can only occur 1 times in procedure N(Sales Document Item).
How to solve this problem?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Jr Steve,
As Ravi mentioned earlier, In Partner Functions AF is checked for being UNIQUE, go to partner determination for customer and in partner functions folder, Select your AF partner funtion and uncheck Unique field.
Hope it helped you.
Regards
Sunitha.

IDoc Item Level number Generation Issue.

Hi,
I am in the need of the mapping information.
Header_File1:
1234     567890
1234     678901
Cont_File2:
1234     567890     123456
1234     567890     123457
1234     678901     789012
1234     678901     789013
Cont_Item_File3:
1234     567890     123456     9876543
1234     567890     123456     9876544
1234     567890     123457     9876549
1234     567890     123457     9876550
1234     678901     789012     9876555
1234     678901     789012     9876555
1234     678901     789013     9876596
1234     678901     789013     9876597
According to the above Cont_File2 4 Idocs will be created with the reference of the Cont_File2.
While in the Item Level mapping (Field Name - Itemno) I want to generate the number with the increment of 5.
Using the counter java funcation Inital Value 10, Incement by 5 then Format number function is using and it is mapped with the target field.
Now the problem is for creating the Item level IDoc for the first IDoc it is creating with the the values 10 and 15. 2 Items are created according to the Input file.
While creating the next IDoc the number has to start from 10. But it is taking from 15+5 = 20.
Please let me know what funcation or UDF to fix this issue.
Jane

Ok. By mistake . you need to use a UDF.
like this Type UDF = By Context
Parameters field[]
Parameters value = constant 10
try this
int inc = Integer.parseInt(value[0]);
for (int j = 0; j < field.length; j++){
       result.addValue(Integer.toString(inc));
       inc = inc+5;
field--->UDF >splitbyValue->Target
change the context of field.

Delivery address appearing at Item level and not at Header level in PO

Hello Experts,
We are facing an issue as described below:-
We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
for all the Item Levels.
However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
RKS

HI Paul,
Thank you for your response.In our case even if all the Line/items level have same Plant and storage location still the delivery address is getting printed at Item level and not at Header Level and this is happening only for PO's created from PR's orginating from SRM7.0.
However if we create PR's directly in R/3 and then convert them into PO's,the delivery address is getting printed at the Header level if the delivery address is same for all the Item level.
Can you plz some insite into this?
Your help will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
RKS

ASCP: Lot for Lot at item level.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for