ASN is blocked in R/3
One ASN is blocked in R/3 and that too of past date but still coming to APO when IM is activated.
How can i stop this ASN coming into APO once i activate the IM?
Hi Lakshmi,
Since you have the previous version of build of your project, it would not refer the latest update you made in JCo. You need to re-build after doing the fresh import.
Remember - Correct procedure is, to import the model, build it & then create JCo connections & not the other way round.
Hope this helps you
Best Regards
Chander Kararia
Similar Messages
-
Invoice blocked for qty reason, but condition type deleted from the PO
Hi Gurus,
I have an LIV with R block in the header level. The invoice contains a line item for planned delivery cost condition type FRB1 which was entered manually during PO creation.(no condition record exists for FRB1). But the condition type FRB1 is missing from the PO line item now and when trying to release the invoice block via MRBR, it gives the message that the 'list is incomplete'.
The PO is not having any release strategy and the invoice number is available in the index table RBKP_BLOCKED.
The condition type FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-triggering the pricing. The business needs the pricing to be carried out on the shipment date from the vendors site. So when the vendor issues the goods, the same is updated in the pricing date field in PO line item and the pricing is re-triggered. So in this case the happenings were in the below sequence.
1. Buyer created PO with manually entered FRB1 condition type.
2. Invoice posted against the PO.
3. When vendor has shipped the goods, the ASN updates the pricing date in the PO and carries out re-pricing. The FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-pricing as no condition record existed.
4. Goods receipt posted
5. Trying to release the invoice in MRBR, but the system gives the message that the list is incomplete.
Please suggest how to go ahead with the resolution of the issue.
Regards,
GregGregory Mathews wrote:
Hi Gurus,
>
> I have an LIV with R block in the header level. The invoice contains a line item for planned delivery cost condition type FRB1 which was entered manually during PO creation.(no condition record exists for FRB1). But the condition type FRB1 is missing from the PO line item now and when trying to release the invoice block via MRBR, it gives the message that the 'list is incomplete'.
> The PO is not having any release strategy and the invoice number is available in the index table RBKP_BLOCKED.
>
> The condition type FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-triggering the pricing. The business needs the pricing to be carried out on the shipment date from the vendors site. So when the vendor issues the goods, the same is updated in the pricing date field in PO line item and the pricing is re-triggered. So in this case the happenings were in the below sequence.
>
> 1. Buyer created PO with manually entered FRB1 condition type.
> 2. Invoice posted against the PO.
> 3. When vendor has shipped the goods, the ASN updates the pricing date in the PO and carries out re-pricing. The FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-pricing as no condition record existed.
> 4. Goods receipt posted
> 5. Trying to release the invoice in MRBR, but the system gives the message that the list is incomplete.
>
> Please suggest how to go ahead with the resolution of the issue.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
Hi Greg,
Are there any a/c entries showing in GR a/c doc for this cond type? I think it could be a bug when you run the ASN Idoc. Try to un-check Delete indicator for FRB1 which would stop it getting deleted.
Regards
Shiva -
Creating custom field in ASN screen of SRM SUS
Hi,
Our requirment is as follows
A custom defined field is to be created in the ASN screen under the Delivery Information block (under the field Bill of Ladding)
As in the normal scenario of ASN the shipment notification is sent to R/3 through XI. Now this new custom field is also to be sent to R/3 through XI in the normal way. This field carries a alphanumerical value
Could someone help us in this regard, how to create this new field in SRM and map it to XI
System Details:
SRM SERVER 5.5
SRM 5.0
XI 7.0
Regards,
SolaiDear Solai
For addind new fields in SRM-SUS scenarios
First add an field in the inbound delivery in R3 tables
Second map the same in XI in the adapter engine in the mappping process
third add field at the table level in SRM also refer note 672960 where it is refering the INCL_EEW_* structures .
Secndly modify the template which is dispayed on the SUS portal .
Regards,
Nimish Sheth
do reward points for helpful answers. -
Open quantity gets blocked (SUS)
Hi all,
We had PO qty 4 each, GR was done for 4 each (through SUS), but in quality inspection 1 qty was rejected in quality inespection and 122 movement type, nw the vendor must be able to do ASN against the remaining 1 qty, but the system dont allow to do the ASN against the PO, it is showing confirmed quantity as 4 each..
Same is the case with schedule lines the open quantity gets blocked..
any suggestion.. please guide me..
Regards,
Abhishek
MM/SRMHi Abhishek,
You can do a GR only when the vendor has sent an ASN.
Regards,
Nikhil -
Hi All,
ASN (Advance Shipment Notification) was sent from SUS system to R/3 ,in R/3 idoc is not getting posted and in WE02
we are getting Idoc error with status 51 " Document already being processed" . Please help me in solve this issue.
Thanks and regards
UmaNote 1258623 - ME185/ME187: Authorization problem during PO determination
After the second Purchase Order determination during inbound delivery processing you get the error message ME185: Document & already being processed, but no user really blocks this PO
Other terms
ME 185, ME187, ME 187, BORGR, EXITFLAG
Reason and Prerequisites
The reason for this problem is due to a program error.
This error will appear only for the users who do not have the necessary authorization to handle in a PO related plant any purchase order changes (create an inbound delivery is such a change) and PO determination is used for several items.
for us, one user recieved goods from srm via confirmation.and this was not posted that time doc went error state. again he posted new confirmtion. it went fine..
check rfcuser authorisation . for eg, it happened to me there was communication eror between both system. but idoc remain in error in status. i created a new
Solution -
ASN POACK needs to be MRP relevant and InboundDelivery auto set to COMPLETE
Dear Experts,
We have the following requirement not sure how to implement this.
Need ASN's and POACK to be MRP relevant for accurate planning.Business
needs to receive against PO,not the inbound delivery for efficiency
purposes.
Set confirmation control key to have MRP relevant and GR relevant but
without invoking the use of an inbound delivery.
When inbound delivery is created from inbound ASN,need ability to
automatically set Inbound delivery to COMPLETE.This supports delivery &
shipping requirement to receive using PO,not Inbound Delivery, and NOT
have inventory supply duplicated,e.g. by Inbound Delivery created by
ASN, and again by any Inbound Delivery that may be created as part of
the PO receipt process.
Secure creation/change POACK and ASN now MRP relevant documents to
avoid overpass the PO line item QTY+tolerance,by providing'error'
message and blocking the saving of the document if happens.
Does it exist an user exit to implement this.
Look forward to get your reply.
Thank you and regardsWorked with DBA and though source tables were not huge, we extended manually and proccess completed once we re-ran.
Thanks all. -
Hi Harold,
We were just issued our IPv6 address block by Arin, and it came with three ASNs. Could you provide any information on why there are three (instead of just one)? Also, would I use one of those ASNs for my EIGRP routing on the inside or are those only for use with my BGP routing to our ISPs? (in other words, can I use a private ASN for EIGRP on the inside or will that mess things up?) Thanks much!EIGRP AS number isn't related to BGP AS number. As a general rule, to communicate with other ISPs via BGP you need a public AS number given to you by someone like arin. You can pick whatever AS number you like to use for EIGRP. Your EIGRP AS number has no bearing whatsoever on your BGP AS number. They can be the same, or they can be different.
hth -
Creation of a Goods receipt based on an ASN in SRM
Hi,
we want to implement a scenario like this (with SRM 7.0):
1) Requester creates Catalog SC;
2) SC gets approved;
3) PO is created (at this moment we haven't chosen between classic or Extended Classic scenario)
4) Supplier Connects to a Portal (not SRM) and post an ASN in SAP Backend
5) (THIS IS THE QUESTION): is it possible for the Requester (who created the SC) to post (in SRM) a GR based on the ASN that it has been created in SAP?
Additional Info: in this scenario SUS system is not foreseen; only SRM (EBP) and SAP backend system
Thanks
MaxHi,
we want to implement a scenario like this (with SRM 7.0):
1) Requester creates Catalog SC;
2) SC gets approved;
3) PO is created (at this moment we haven't chosen between classic or Extended Classic scenario)
4) Supplier Connects to a Portal (not SRM) and post an ASN in SAP Backend
5) (THIS IS THE QUESTION): is it possible for the Requester (who created the SC) to post (in SRM) a GR based on the ASN that it has been created in SAP?
Additional Info: in this scenario SUS system is not foreseen; only SRM (EBP) and SAP backend system
Thanks
Max -
Data blocks in forms 6i, can not see the data
i have built an application in forms with some data blocks. the blocks a connect to some tables in the db. i have built them connectd as "system". but when i run the applicatio as user x i can do select, insert, update, delete, but i can not se the records in the datablocks (they are empty), but i can do all transactios. why?
First of all, developing from the System schema is not a good idea.
Who owns the tables your form is connecting to? The table owner should create a public synonym for each table name, and also needs to grant user x access to the table. -
Report for Open PO and ASN.
Hello All,
We need a report that shows all parts ordered and not received. It would be a combination of the open orders and open ASN's.
Do we have any report that can satisfy this request.
Thanks in advance.
Forum ShahHello All,
Thanks for your reply.
I want to create a new report
The RECORD SELECTION FIELDS in this new report should include the following:
1. Plant Number = (should be mandatory field)
2. Vendor Number =
3. Material Number =
4. Purch Doc Type =
5. Purch Doc Number =
6. Material Type =
7. Item Category =
8. Account Asgn Category =
9. Confirmation Cntl Key =
10. Due Date =
The OUTPUT COLUMNS in this new report should be export-ready to Excel (ALV), and include the following columns:
1. Plant Number =
2. Plant Name =
3. Vendor Number =
4. Vendor Name =
5. Purch Doc Number (both PO and SA) =
6. Line Number =
7. Material Number =
8. Material Description =
9. Material Type =
10. Item Category =
11. Account Asgn Category =
11. Confirmation Cntl Key =
12. Qty Due = Original qty u2013 received qty
13. Date Due =
(repeat QTY and DATE for all open releases)
14. ASN Number (if ASN has been recorded in SAP) = EKES-VBELN
Now i am having issue while developing logic for delivery dates, Inbound delivery and GR.
When i create IB my remaining open quantities should be seen. And when I am doing GR whole line should get disappear.
I tried MDBS, EKET and EKES table. But i am not able to link delivery dates, due qty, inbound delivery and GR qty.
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance,
Forum Shah -
hi experts,
i have created blocked ALV program.
in the o/p , it displays list of recors for open items,then list of records for cleared items.
now i want it to display sum of both open and cleared items of particular column.
in grid display it is displaying total for open and cleared items.
but in blocked alv it is not displaying total for open and closed items separately.
and also i need grand total of both.
if any body knows please tell me..Hi Sridevi
Refer this code as an example.
This code calculates the occupied column from sflight table.
TYPE-POOLS: slis.
DATA:it_fieldcat TYPE slis_t_fieldcat_alv,
is_layout TYPE slis_layout_alv,
it_events TYPE slis_t_event ,
it_sort TYPE slis_t_sortinfo_alv .
DATA: wa_fcat LIKE LINE OF it_fieldcat,
wa_sort LIKE LINE OF it_sort.
DATA: i_flight TYPE sflight_tab1.
SELECT * FROM sflight
INTO TABLE i_flight
UP TO 10 ROWS.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE'
EXPORTING
i_program_name = sy-repid
i_structure_name = 'SFLIGHT'
CHANGING
ct_fieldcat = it_fieldcat
EXCEPTIONS
inconsistent_interface = 1
program_error = 2.
wa_fcat-do_sum = 'X'.
MODIFY it_fieldcat FROM wa_fcat
TRANSPORTING do_sum WHERE fieldname = 'SEATSOCC'.
wa_sort-up = 'X'.
wa_sort-fieldname = 'CARRID'.
wa_sort-subtot = 'X'.
APPEND wa_sort TO it_sort.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_INIT'
EXPORTING
i_callback_program = sy-repid.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_APPEND'
EXPORTING
is_layout = is_layout
it_fieldcat = it_fieldcat
i_tabname = 'I_FLIGHT'
it_events = it_events
it_sort = it_sort
* I_TEXT = ' '
TABLES
t_outtab = i_flight
EXCEPTIONS
program_error = 1
maximum_of_appends_reached = 2
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_APPEND'
EXPORTING
is_layout = is_layout
it_fieldcat = it_fieldcat
i_tabname = 'I_FLGIHT'
it_events = it_events
it_sort = it_sort
* I_TEXT = ' '
TABLES
t_outtab = i_flight
EXCEPTIONS
program_error = 1
maximum_of_appends_reached = 2
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_BLOCK_LIST_DISPLAY'
Thanks and Regards -
Sale Order Credit Block due to open credit memo
Dear All,
System is blocking sale order for open items(credit). And the only open item is credit memo.
Can we avoid credit note to be considered as open item?
Thanks
ArunDear Arun,
Do not think this is possible in standard.
I would suggest the following way.
Currently system is giving a message during sales order creation . right?
Ask your abaper to find an EXIT before that point.
There write a code to exclude CREDIT MEMO document types from BSEG of the customer code.
It is possible as i have worked in similar requirement.
Check and revert back.
Thanks & Regards,
Hegal K Charles -
Copied layout is not working for Sales order item assinment block
Hi Experts,
I copied the standard componet BT115IT_SLS/items view layout with custom role configuration key and worked fine.
I have added one more field to the item view with the same configuration and saved .When I opended the sales order in the WEB UI , The item assigment block is displaying with complete BTADMINI context fileds and This is the issue.
I have seen configured fields only in the personalization and I have downloaded the items assigment block data to Execl.In the Execl sheet I can able to see the configured fields (availble fileds in the configuration tab in component workbemch) data only.
But Items assignment block is displaying all the fileds (taking from the context node BTADMINI).
I have deleted existing customer configuration and again copied from the standard layout.But I got the same issue.
I have wriiten some code in the ON_NEW_FOCUS and commented the code.Still it not working.
Please help me , where I have done the mistake and provide me some inputs.
Thanks,
VenkkyHi Experts,
Solved isuues myself.
The problem is inconsistency of BTAdminI context node . I have deleted the view enhancement and again enhanced the view .I copied the layout with customer role key and dispalyed expected layout.
Thanks,
Venkky -
Report generation for Delivery Blocked Orders
Hi All,
I am trying to pull up a report which should contain only orders with the Delivery Block.
Through VL06O i can get the orders which need to PGIed, which are open, which are stuck in workflow and which have got delivery block.
So is it possible to separate the delivery blocked orders (from an end user point of view) from the other orders. I tried to have a look at the filters which i could put on the VL06O-> Outbound Deliv. for PGI, but couldn't find it.
can any one help in thi regard.
Thank you in advance.Hi,
Try report V.02 - Incomplete Orders -
SQL Timeouts and Blocking Locks
SQL Timeouts and Blocking Locks
Just wanted to check in and see if anyone here has feedback on application settings, ColdFusion settings, JBOSS settings or other settings that could help to limit or remove SQL Timeouts and blocking locks on SID's.
We're using MS SQL 2000 with JBOSS and IIS5.
We've been seeing the following error in our logs that starts blocking locks in SQL:
java.sql.SQLException: [newScale] [SQLServer JDBC Drive] [SQLServer] Lock request time out period exceeded.
Once this happens, we're hosed until we remove the blocking SID in SQL. These are the connections to the application.
Any feedback would be great. Thanks!Hi
This is your exact solution:
Select a.username, a.sid, a.serial#, b.id1, c.sql_text
From v$session a, v$lock b, v$sqltext c
Where b.id1 in( Select distinct e.id1
from v$session d , v$lock e
where d.lockwait = e.kaddr ) and
a.sid = b.sid and
c.hash_value = a.sql_hash_value and
b.request =0;
Thanks
Sarju
Oracle DBA
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by I'm clueless:
Can someone give me the SQL statement to
show if there are any blocking database locks and if so - which user is locking the Database?
Thanks in Advance<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null
Maybe you are looking for
-
IMac G4 Flat Panel as Apple TV?
I have a five year old iMac Flat Panel (this one; the 125 GHz model) that I've recently retired and replaced, due to a dead monitor. Since an iMac with a dead monitor is more or less worthless on eBay, I've been trying to come up with an alternate us
-
Hi experts! Would you give me some advice to find the best way for handling the situation below? Suppose I have a measuring system with 100 sensors. The measuring system can provide the measured values (with timestamp) through a simple text file (lar
-
Can't modify/delete Outlook 2010 Contact Group
I've got a user who created a new Contact Group in Outlook 2010 and now can't modify or delete the group. Other groups she's created before or since do not exhibit this behavior. Also, when you bring up the properties of the group, the window looks
-
Notification for Application Services in EBS R12
Hi DBAs, I need to implement alert notification for Applications Services (web, form, conc managers) in R12.1.1, if any or all of these services go down then I should get email alert. What is the best way to do it - Any heart beat check or cron job t
-
Date popup shows centuries wrongly
I have 2.1.0.62 version. Steps to reproduce the bug: 1. Make sure you have double-digits year format in your NLS settings 2. Execute follow script: select to_date('01-01-2210', 'MM-DD-YYYY') from dual; 3. In the result pane double click on the date 4