Aspect Ratio and Chapter Issues in iDVD

HI there,
I may be being particularly dense here and missing something but I'm being driven avsolutely mad by this.
Firstly, I have a Movie which is 16:9, correctly flagged in Quicktime as 16:9, and plays in 16:9 until I add it to a project (a 16:9 themed project) in iDVD whereupon it gets sqaushed to 4:3. This is ridiculous.
The only workaround I found was to imprt the whole movie into iMovie and 'Share' it then to iDVD which preserved the aspect ratio but took rather a long time to process,
The second issue I'm having is with inserting Chapter markers. I see that you can insert these regularly every 4 minutes or whatever, but what if you actually want to insert them at the start of a scene ? I wouldn't have thought it was beyond the ken of man to allow you to specify a particular timecode for each chapter marker ?
Hopefully I'm missing something that someone can put me right on, either that or iDVD is really missing a trick.
Thanks in advance for your help
Richard

You create the chapter markers in iMovie before going to iDVD.

Similar Messages

  • Dell 2009w aspect ratio and color issues

    I got a Dell 2009w 20" screen for free
    it works (kinda) with my iBook G4 by using the Mini-VGA to VGA Adapter
    BUT the color is all F'ed up, no matter how much calibration I try
    and the aspect ratio is squashed/stretched.
    does anyone know of a driver or patch that can be downloaded to fix this?
    I'm trying to avoid searching for a new video card

    iBookG4guy, Welcome to the discussion area!
    No there is no driver or patch.
    Also it is not possible to replace the iBook's video card since it is built into the motherboard.

  • Aspect ratio and render line issue

    When I overwrite the video from the source (top left) window to the timeline, it is changing the aspect ratio and a red 'render' line is appearing on the time line.
    The video is now zoomed in and pixelated.
    I have not had this issue while editing with my other files and the settings seem to be correct. Am I missing something super obvious?

    The PPro tutorial list in message #3 http://forums.adobe.com/message/2276578 may help, with more help in message #5
    Look for the NEW ITEM information on page 5

  • Pixel Aspect Ratio and ciphering type of footage-CS6

    CS6- updated 12\18\13  V-11.03
    Hi All,
    A few questions about:
    Pixel Aspect Ratio and ciphering type of footage. Bare with me as I touch on two different aspects of what I feel are related:
    1. Setting up a Comp-
    Having AE decide on the correct footage being used- Via >Import footage,.(to Folder) then drag it on, or into the 'make comp icon' where AE is supposed to do a 'best guess' for the comp settings. Be it square pix or otherwise. What are the second value in brackets ? See pic
    2. Interpolation-
    When using two diff footage sources- If using two different source footages in a comp. Is this where I should interplolate my footage to match the existing footage and the comp settings (If I have choosen NOT to pre-comp that secondary footage?)
    3. Seperating fields-
    How come footage that a camera manufacturer claims to be shooting in Progressive 30 or 24p is showing up as interlaced in my comp's CP? The manual to the cam says 30p or 24p or 60i The footage was shot at 30p (for sure)
    Here is a screen grab of AE's 'best guess' of that footage, showing it with an UPPER field render; indicative of HD Interlaced footage and then in the inerpolate settings - 'kinda confirming it.
    Now for the way out- Render:
    4. If that is in fact Interlaced and I then want to reduce the size of that 1920 footage to 66% size... Do I need to do anything in particular at this point?
    For some reason I am getting an error on my end when trying to export as an AVI and reducing size to 1280
    5. Is this from the Field render of interlaced challenge?
    I ended  up with a couple of errors and then aborted the whole file and re-imported to start over with this error. Which happend again after a redoux
    So I sent it over to Prem Pro to export those MTS Files as a movie and noted AGAIN the reference to Interlaced video. "upper and lower" Prem Pro was able to use the same MTS files and export a working movie. (so those files were not corrupt BTW) Yet Note PP's output reference to that footage again as Interlaced would be...
    Thanks for any clarity on those "5" questions... NC

    Thanks for the details Rick. 
    Thanks for the insight on  #1
    Ref #2, You should never change the interpretation of Pixel aspect ratio on footage  unless you know for a certainty that it is wrong. For example, open Photoshop or Illustrator and create a new document that is 720  X 480 pixels and AE will always interpret the image as rectangular pixels because that is a standard rectangular pixel frame size.
    Unless you specifically created the image in Photoshop with rectangular pixels it is square pixels so the interpretation must be changed to avoid distortion.
    --Did you mean to write:
    Unless you specifically created the image in Photoshop with SQUARE pixels using  a rectangle layout?  I am not trying to bust your blz here, I am trying to understand the unknown. (for me)
    So it may very well be AE mis-guessing the footage and the Upper first is a mistake on AE's part and I need to test it to find out? On that note...
    Ref#3, Separating fields must be done right. Some 1080P footage is interpreted as having fields. This may be incorrect and if there is a question you MUST test the footage. Test the footage by making sure that the fields are being separated
    How do I make sure the fields are being seperated? Does the window as in pic two from the top of my post confirm that or is there another test?
    Then I do the following:
    then selecting the footage in the project panel and choosing Create Composition from Selection, then opening the Composition settings, doubling the frame rate and stepping through the footage a frame at a time. If the footage is really interlaced then each of the frames will be different.  (IE:  29.94 to 59.94fps) OK
    If the field order is reversed then motion will be in the right direction then reverse, then go back to the right direction. ---I did not understand?  Are you referring to Upper and Lower reverse?   Direction, as in fwd and back in Time line? Sorry unlclear on my end...
    Oh and HFR footage? HFR? High frame rate??
    One last thing, Do all cameras shoot anamorphic, or could they as AE is showing my MTS files; are Square? (1.00) Pic #1
    @Dave-  You -
    At 1080, a lot of footage is interlaced, and evidently your camera made interlaced footage
    Me- How do you know? because of the 2nd pic and upper field first indication?
    You-Even if you know for a fact that it was shot 30p, the camera captures the entire frame... but it records it as two fields. They give it a fancy name: Progressive Segmented Frame. 
    Me- Is this typical false advertisement of the sales divison of brands like not telling you what CMOS or CCD is in a cam just slapping HD 1080p on the side of the box?
    You-AE will treat it as an entire frame if you interpret it as having a field order of None.
    Me- Won't that be a problem mis leading AE on an interpret?
    Thanks Gents for the precise details.
    Best
    NC

  • Cropping in PS while Maintaining Aspect Ratio and DPI

    I shoot the Nikon D3, RAW (.NEF) and convert through ACR. Through ACR, the DPI is set to 300 DPI; the DPI caries over to Photoshop.
    I crop in Photoshop using the crop tool (not marquee). To maintain 2:3 or 3:2 aspect ratios, the crop tool requires the width and height in inches or pixels. If specifying resolution, the document size will crop to that DPI, if not; the DPI is derived from pixel dimensions.
    In my case, I’ve been cropping at 2in by 3in (or reverse for orientation). The resulting “real” image pixel dimensions are still very high (correct to crop size) but the document size reported in PS is 2in by 3in with a wildly high DPI. By changing the resolution back to 300 DPI through Photoshop, the document size returns to normal. Therefore the picture has not lost anything; it appears to only be a function of the Meta data. The pixel dimensions remain constant while the document size and DPI change.
    It apears that you canot specify an aspect ratio via the crop tool without defining it in inches or cm. You can do it with the marquee tool but the marquee tool sucks for cropping. You can however crop in ACR with the crop tool by merely specifying the aspect ratio (not in inches or cm). In summary, the PS crop tool is based in inches or cm while the ACR crop tool is simply aspect ratio.
    What I can do to crop in PS while maintaining aspect ratio and defined DPI. Is there a work-around, magic trick, or something else I can do to fool the PS crop tool into an aspect ratio not based in inches or cm?

    Just to summarize:
    Setting a dimensioned ratio (e.g., 2 in by 3 in for Width and Height) in the Crop tool without filling in a Resolution value yields a crop with the desired aspect ratio, and without any resampling.
    There is no way to specify a ratio with the crop tool, specifically, as the OP has requested, though in a future version perhaps specifying simple numbers there without any units might be a way Adobe could facilitate this.  It would be a nice addition and with little downside.
    I guess what I don't understand, though, is why the OP cares about the "high" resulting dpi value?  It's just a number.
    Expanding on this, the Resolution is nothing but a metadata value that can be changed at will (e.g., through Image - Image Size... - uncheck Resample) at any time in the future.  There is ALWAYS a Resolution value associated with the image, both before and after the crop (though the crop tool may end up changing it; so what?).  In short, the Resolution is just an arbitrary figure until such time as the user wants to use the image for a purpose (e.g. printing).
    Always think in terms of pixel dimensions (number of pixels horizontally and vertically) while editing, then think about dpi right before publishing.  It's hard to go wrong this way.
    -Noel

  • How do I control aspect ratio and pixel dimension in iMovie 10

    When you created a new movie in iMovie 9 the program would ask if you wanted 4:3 or 16:9 aspect ratio and when you saved the movie it would ask about the size of the file and pixel dimensions.  How do I controll these in iMovie 10?

    I think they screwed up - but I have solved the problem by deleting it and reinstalling version 9.0.9 which you can get from the support at http://www.apple.com/uk/support/mac-apps/imovie/
    Frankly I don't see the point of Theatre and I don't use iCloud so reverting back to a version that actually works seemed a good option!

  • What is the aspect ratio and fps for video in Connect 9?

    I'm trying to find any definitive details on the aspect ratio and fps supported by Connect 9.  It is well documented for 8 that it was 640x480 at 20 fps.  Is that the same for 9?  Or has that improved?

    The supported resolution and frame rates for video in the Video pod have not changed with Connect 9.

  • What is aspect ratio and how can you change it?

    Please refer to my other post for more information on these photos. The photos I am referring to are the ones that appear blank in the edit screen.
    When I try to export these photos to facebook using the exporter, it says that IPhoto can only deal with photos with an aspect ratio of 3:1 or lower, and that the photos selected have a greater aspect ratio. What is aspect ratio and if possible, how do you change it? This may be directly linked to my other problem with the same pics.

    I'm having the same trouble. Zapplications will upload only 1920x1920 photos. With iPhoto I can't get past the automatic ratio of 1920x1440!!! There MUST be some way to customize photo size on iPhoto!! Please help!! I've tried cropping the photo to a square and still can't get past this ratio thing.

  • Captivate videos - aspect ratio and skin

    1. When I import video into captivate, it correctly keeps the same width and height of the source video IF I do not use the haloSkin. If I use the haloSkin (which is always visible and creates a frame around the video), the video itself shrinks to put the skin around it, but it also loses its aspect ratio and becomes squished vertically. There's no easy way to adjust the video so it uses the proper aspect ratio or even width and height without manually eyeballing it. Am I missing something?
    2. Are the video skins customizable? If I wanted to do something simple like change the haloSkin to be colored black instead of white, is that possible?
    Thanks,
    Keith

    1) The haloSkin subtracts 20 px from the width and 50 px from the height of event videos, which is not only counter-intuitive but obnoxious because it does indeed mess up the aspect ratio of your video as you noted. So a 640x480 video object with the skin applied has a video area of 620x430. Fortunately the 20 and 50 are absolute, and don't change with the size of the video object. This means that you can just add 20 to the width and 50 to the height of the video object to get your video back to the correct size. (a video object with dimensions 660x530 and the haloSkin applied has a video area of 640x480)
    2) I'm unaware of any way to edit the skins.

  • Aspect Ratio and Pixel Aspect Ratio

    I am importing P2 footage and wondering what my sequence settings should be? As in Aspect Ratio and Pixel Aspect Ratio would need to be? Do I need to ask the DOP what settings on the P2 have been used when filming?

    If you have FCP 6 then when you drop a clip into the timeline it will ask you if you want to configure the sequence to match...just click YES.
    But you should know what format they shot. Find that out then choose the Easy Setup that matches, and make a new sequence. Or let FCP 6 and 7 do that for you, like I mentioned.
    Shane

  • Slightly distorted aspect-ratio (and missing alpha channel) when copy/paste from Photoshop

    Maybe this is an old topic (but I didn't find anything on google or this forum):
    When I copy images from Photoshop to Flash, the aspect ratio of the bitmap gets distorted. A 728x90 Bitmap becomes 727.6x90 (and so on...). The dpi is set on exactly 72 on both programs. Is there any way to JUST get a 1:1 pixel copy? (except using another program like Irfanview as a "man-in-the-middle")
    Although I selected "32 bit color w/alpha" in the clipboard settings of Flash, the alpha channel seems to get discarded when copying from Photoshop. Shouldn't it at least work with Photoshop? I mean, it's an Adobe product after all and maybe the most commonly used together with Flash.
    Would just be nice if a copy-paste between PS and FL was an easier thing.
    I know there can also be a pixel-aspect somewhere (like used for video productions and wide-screen), but I didn't find settings for that anywhere.
    I still use Flash Professional CS5.0

    I'm on windows7 with CS5.5 and transparency and size are copied over just fine. You answered what would be my first question, 72dpi. How about the image mode. Are you using RGB 8bit?
    I've had lots of issues with the OS not handling transparency very well also, such right-click on an image on a website that you know is a PNG and has transparency, then paste it into photoshop, the transparency isn't saved.
    The route that always works (but is a PITA) is of course to save it as a PNG with transparency and just import it.

  • Maintaining Aspect Ratio and Quality

    Hello FCE Guru's!
    Yesterday while editing I noticed that my footage in FCE that I shot on a canon 7d was not as clear as the raw footage. When I adjusted my settings in FCE using the sequence settings tab, my project became smaller and seemed to regain its clarity.
    But the problem is when I import any footage that wasn't already in the project the aspect ratio is bigger than what was in my project prior to adjusting the sequence settings? Even when I try and re-adjust the sequence settings the video stays small while new clips that I import are a lot larger????
    So basically I have footage that is smaller than other footage, How do I keep all my footage the same size throughout the entire project?
    I would like to know how I can fix this issue and what I did wrong to avoid in the future. I really hope this is something that is fixable as my project is 90% complete and the client is looking for a finished product by Friday. Please Help!
    Thanks in advance.

    Sorry,
    Here is everything:
    The footage that is in my timeline and saved to my project is: 1920x1080
    *My Easy Setup settings are setup as*: AVCHD Apple Intermediate Codec 1920x1080i60 Format (all Format) Rates (all Rates)
    *My sequence settings are setup as*: Apple Intermediate Codec 1920x1080i60
    *The footage That I shot and trying to import reads exactl*y: 1920x1080 Apple Intermediate Codec, Integer (Big Endian)
    *The issue is*: The Footage that I have in my timeline as well as in my project already seems to be a smaller than the footage that I am attempting to import into my project. The footage I want to import is Full Frame While the footage I already had in my project is smaller in my viewer.
    Please let me know if you need any further information,
    Thank You.

  • Aspect Ratio and HD TV

    I just installed three HDMI adapters on three LCD TVs.  Two of the TVs are now displaying a HD picture that covers the entire screen.  However my Insignia does not fill the screen.  Over the phone the Comcast Technician decided I probably had a bad adapter so a Comcast technician is sending a on-site technician late this coming Saturday.  However, on the menu I found  a Aspect Ratio option which was set at Normal--Is that where it belongs?   If I selected wide the picture filled the screen , but am I just fooling myself that I now have a HD picture?
    Thanks a bunch,   Uncle Dewey

    Uncle Dewey,
    I do apologize for the frustration you're experiencing with your Insignia television. I appreciate your paitence as I try and figure out a solution for you. I might have a possible solution.
    While on "TV" input, go to the 'channels' menu and set 'auto zoom' to 'on'. Make sure once this is completed that your aspect ratio is set back to 'normal' or if listed, 'auto'. Let me know if this resolves your issue!
    Devon - Best Buy - San Diego, CA
    To show appreciation -or- to mark my response as a solution, please use the kudos function. NOTE: Providing kudos for appreciation does not automatically mark a response as a Solution! Thanks!
    I am a Best Buy Employee. However, my opinions and views are NOT an official representation of the company.
    I will try my best to help. My knowledge is based off of my personal experiences, research, and training. I may not always be right... Just most of the time!

  • A slightly different problem with aspect ratio and DVD Maker

    I am converting VHS movies to DVD. All are 4:3. Using Microsoft Movie Maker, I create the desired final result, a WMV file that plays perfectly--aspect ratio, sound, whatever.
    The problem comes when I use DVD Maker to create the DVD. The picture gets squeezed pretty much to a square (from the 4:3 original). DVD Maker correctly shows 4:3 as the desired ratio.
    Ironically (considering the solution offered in several similar posts), when I convert that WMV file to AVI, and _then_ use DVD Maker, all appears fine. My only complaint at this point is that the result is "window-boxed." That is, there is large black space
    on all four sides.
    I see nothing in DVD Maker to adjust (in hopes that the original WMV might work for me), but just thought I'd ask.

    Hi,
    There’s similar thread discuss the DVD maker for 4:3 or 16:9 you can refer:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itpromedia/thread/cd5edb7b-a4dd-43c9-ae95-20ac5692b2c6
    And I find someone has submit it as a bug to our website, if our development team recognize it was a bug, they will fix it on next update.
    Thank you for your understanding.
    Regards,
    Leo   Huang
    TechNet Subscriber Support
    If you are
    TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback
    here.
    Leo Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • I have a project in FCP that is a 2:1 aspect ratio. When I send to compressor to author a DVD I lose the aspect ratio and the image fills the 16x9 frame. How do I preserve the original ratio thru compressor?

    Aspect ratio lost in compressor

    Hi Tom, thanks so much for answering. I totally get the need to letterbox but my issue is, how do I get the best quality in letterbox format?
    Should I export it thru QT Conversion or just Export to Quicktime Movie? I exported as a self contained movie to keep the quality but when I send it thru the MPEG-2 compressor for DVD it fills the 16x9 frame without letterbox.
    How would I modify the MPEG-2 preset to give me the letterbox in the MPEG-2?
    I've been playing around but haven't hit the jackpot yet.
    If there's any info you have, it would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks so much
    James

Maybe you are looking for

  • My iMac freezes when i try to use iTunes...

    Greetings, When i try to play tv episodes or movies that i've purchased from iTunes, my iMac completely freezes and I must restart using the start button on the back. Please help! Thanks in advance!

  • Mail 1.3.11

    My mail app. used to check for email automatically when set at 1minute or up to 1hour intervals, but not any more. Can anyone tell me why it isn't please and how to fix it? Thank you

  • Can .air installer some files together with the application?

    I have an installer.air that is created by Adobe Flash. I have another file called settings.cfg which is needed for my application to run. How do let the computer auto install settings.cfg into the installation directory together with the application

  • Return inside try...catch

    I realized that, if there is a return inside a try block, both javac and jikes generate exception handlers that do not include the return instruction. For instance, for a code like try {    a = 1;     if (a == 1) {         a++;         return;     a

  • Will Firefox 3.5 work on an IMac power PC G5 with OS 10.4.8?

    Your faqs say that Firefox 3.6 is the last version that works with os 10.4.8. Tell me where I can download Firefox 3.5. I could not find anyplace on your website offering previous versions.