Assertion Failed alert when exporting in Lightroom 2 BETA

Please help! I am currently using the Lightroom 2 Beta on a Mac (OS X 10.4.11) and installed a plug-in to allow for a graphical watermark. Unfortunately, the plug-in wouldn't work properly (showed an internal error even though the plug in manager said it was working fine) and when I removed the plug in (through the plug in manager) I now cannot export at all through the export button in the Library mode. I get an alert saying "assertion failed". Technically I can still export through the file/export option but cannot get to the settings window (filenames, folders etc) to show what folder to put them into or specify the export settings.
Console report: "2008-04-08 10:21:19.413 Adobe Lightroom 2 Beta[308] Oops! An untagged string (assertion failed!) got thrown far enough that we display it to the user. This shouldn't happen."
I tried reinstalling but must have missed a file as the same error keeps appearing.
Can anyone give me a hand?

See the notes on the beta forum. Post this there.

Similar Messages

Saturation Loss When Exporting from Lightroom.

This happens to me when exporting from Lightroom 2 or 3. It happens regardless of the color profile, file format, bit depth, image size, compression, or the method of export. I regularly profile my one-year-old iMac monitor with an Eye One Display 2. My working color space for Photoshop CS4 is ProPhoto. After exporting, I am viewing the images in Photoshop, Safari, Firefox and Apple Preview, with the same result. I have used pretty much all the available export methods in Lightroom, including exporting with Lighroom ad-ons such as SlideshowPro. And, conversely, if I edit an image to my liking ourside of Lightroom, there is a saturation increase when I import it into Lightroom. The effect tends to be most obvious and bothersome with shots taken outside on sunny days, with lots of blues and greens. I am shooting raw files with a Canon 5d II and I use the Adobe Standard profile in Lightroom.
There is a section at the back of Martin Evening's Lightroom book where he talks about the Lightroom color space and Lightroom versus Photoshop curves, which seems to relate to what I am seeing, but I have the feeling that what I seeing is more pronounced than what he is talking about there. It is a real dullng of the look, not merely a slight difference in how the colors are rendered.

Looks like Lightroom doesn't like your display profile.
Try removing the profile (don't know how to do it on a Mac) to leave your display uncalibrated. Are the colors still different in Lightroom and Photoshop?

Assertion failed! while exporting my pics from lightroom5 plz help?

assertion failed! while exporting my pics from lightroom5 plz help?

If exporting via "hard drive" service, check post-processing in bottom section of export dialog box, and set it to something other than "blank".

Lightroom 4: assertion failed message when opening [was: help]

I have download lightroom 4 from a cd and it is telling me assertion failed when i try to open program.

That is all the error message said: assertion failed
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 18:55:35 -0700
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: help
Re: help created by sarika02 in Downloading, Installing, Setting Up - View the full discussion
Hi Lynchgirl,
Please send complete error message or if possible, send a screen shot.

C++ Debug Assertion Failed! - when printing with LOCL method G and GUI 620

Hi all
I've just raised an OSS message with SAP but don't think they'll help as the GUI version is no longer supported... if anyone else has come across this though and has any suggestions that would be great...
Thanks
Ross
Hi
We recently upgraded a few users to the 720 SAP GUI and had issues with LOCL printing, as we were still using the older "F: Printing on Front End computer" method of printing. As per SAP Note "Note 821519 - Front-end printing with control technology" the solution is to use method "G: Front end printing with Control Tech".
However, we now get an issue with SOME users who are running the SAP GUI 620 patch 57. When they try and print to LOCL they get a pop up dialog box error:
"Microsoft Visual C++ Debug Library
Debug Assertion Failed!
Program: C:\Program Files\SAP\FrontEnd\SAPgui\saplogon.exe
File: fputs.c
Line: 48
Expressiom: steam != NULL"
I appreciate that this old GUI is no longer supported BUT the SAP note states that 620 patch 56 is the minimum level for method "G" to work - and previous testing showed that it DID work ok. It seems only some of the 620 patch 57 users are affected - just wondering if you can advise why and if there is a 'quick fix' for this, perhaps an updated fputs.c file or something?
The issue is that we literally have thousands of users on this version and cannot roll out 720 quickly enough & without some additional testing/costs etc. We have a 710 patch 18 version we can roll out but this can cause IE8 issues... neither do we wish to revert to control method "F" as this will then 'break' printing for those users.
We have created a LOCL_OLD printer with method "F" but some users (for various reasons, including hard coded printers in bespoke transactions) cannot select this and have to use LOCL...
If you are aware of the C++ debug assertion error and have any possible solutions that would be much appreciated.
Many thanks
Ross

> I appreciate that this old GUI is no longer supported BUT the SAP note states that 620 patch 56 is the minimum level for method "G" to work - and previous testing showed that it DID work ok. It seems only some of the 620 patch 57 users are affected - just wondering if you can advise why and if there is a 'quick fix' for this, perhaps an updated fputs.c file or something?
fputs.c is a source file that is used to compile the GUI. The assertion is thrown because an expected condition is not met. So even if you would take out the assertion, there's no guarantee it'll work because "something" on the operating system is not right.
I suggest you compare installed software and windows hotfixes on the affected PCs vs. those who don't show this error. The error may also be that after the installation of the SAPGUI another software product was installed that replaced certain DLLs that are also used by the SAPGUI.
Markus

Pictures all grey toned when exported from Lightroom 4.

They look great in Lightroom and then look/print grey toned when exported, even photos that have not been edited. Fix?

Can't think of any ICC profile LR would allow that would produce a grayscale appearing document. Wondering if it's another of those 'corrupted' display profile issues where a grayscale treatment is being applied to the images but in LR it isn't showing? This IS a strange one.
What if in the Print Module you Save as JPEG, Gray?

"Assertion failed" error when executing a simple UCI program

I am using a simple UCI program (tt1.c) with Xmath version 7.0.1 on Sloaris 2.8 that performs the followings:
- Start Xmath701
- Sleep 10 Seconds
- Load a sysbuild model
- Stop Xmath
I am calling the uci executable using the following command:
> /usr/local/apps/matrixx-7.0.1/bin/xmath -call tt1 &
In this way everything works fine and the following printouts from the program are produced.
--------- uci printout ----------
## Starting Xmath 701
## sleep 10 seconds
## load "case_h_cs_ds.xmd";
## Stopping Xmath 701
All the processes (tt1, XMATH, xmath_mon, and sysbld) terminate correctly.
The problem occurs if the 10 second wait after starting xmath is omitted:
- Start Xmath701
- Load a sysbuild model
- Stop Xmath
This results to the following printouts:
--------- uci printout ----------
## Starting Xmath 701
## load "case_h_cs_ds.xmd";
Assertion failed: file "/vob1/xm/ipc/ipc.cxx", line 420 errno 0.
Note that the last line is not produced by the uci program and the tt1 did not
finish (the printout before stopping xmath "## Stopping Xmath 701" was
not produced).
A call to the unix "ps -ef" utility shows that none of the related process has been terminated:
fs085312 27631 20243 0 10:45:29 pts/27 0:00 tt1
fs085312 27643 1 0 10:45:30 ? 0:00 /usr/local/apps/matrixx-7.0.1/solaris_mx_70.1/xmath/bin/xmath_mon /usr/local/app
fs085312 27641 27631 0 10:45:30 ? 0:01 /usr/local/apps/matrixx-7.0.1/solaris_mx_70.1/xmath/bin/XMATH 142606339, 0x8800
fs085312 25473 25446 0 10:45:33 ? 0:01 sysbld ++ 19 4 7 6 5 8 9 0 25446 ++
The questions are as follows:
1- What is "Assertion failed: file "/vob1/xm/ipc/ipc.cxx", line 420 errno 0" and why is that produced?
2- Should the UCI program waits for end of sysbld initialization before issuing commands?
3- If the answer to the above question is yes, is there a way to check the termination of sysbld initialization?
Thanks in advance for you help.
Attachments:
tt1.c ‏1 KB

I tracked down the problem and it is a race condition between the many processes being started up. A smaller delay should also solve the problem. Or, maybe do something else before the first 'load'. The 'load' command tries to launch systembuild and causes the race condition.

Adding zeros to filenames when exporting in Lightroom "Filename-001" "Fliename-002" etc?

Hi, does anyone know if it is possible to add zeros before numbers when exporting files eg: "Filename-001" "Fliename-002" etc? The default setting is "Filename-1" "Filename-2" ect. The reason I want to have zeros in the number sequence is that certain software will display files in the wrong numerical sequence eg: "Filename-1" "Filename-10" Filename-11" etc and then "Filename-2" after "Filename-19". If zeros are added the files will always be displayed in the correct sequence "Filename-001" "Filename-002"... "Filename-009" "Filename-010" "Filename-011" etc.

Just customize the filename using the template editor, and use the Sequence token set to the number of leading zeroes you want, as shown.

Assertion Failed - Dump when clicking on the links from Portal for WD Comp

Hi,
We have a WD Component which is integrated to the Portal . When we click on the link in the Portal for the first 2 times, the selection screen is shown correctly ( when debugged, the program stops in WDDOINIT method before the sel.screen is shown).
When we click on the link for the third or fourth time with no time gap, it shows a dump. This is the dump I am getting.
Runtime Errors         ASSERTION_FAILED
Date and Time          01/06/2011 10:13:58
Short text
The ASSERT condition was violated.
What happened?
In the running application program, the ASSERT statement recognized a
situation that should not have occurred.
The runtime error was triggered for one of these reasons:
- For the checkpoint group specified with the ASSERT statement, the
activation mode is set to "abort".
- Via a system variant, the activation mode is globally set to "abort"
for checkpoint groups in this system.
- The activation mode is set to "abort" on program level.
- The ASSERT statement is not assigned to any checkpoint group.
How to correct the error
Probably the only way to eliminate the error is to correct the program.
If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
keywords:
"ASSERTION_FAILED" " "
"CL_NW7_VIEW_ELEMENT_ADAPTER===CP" or "CL_NW7_VIEW_ELEMENT_ADAPTER===CM004"
"DISPATCH_NW7_EVENT"
If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error
notification to SAP, include the following information:
1. The description of the current problem (short dump)
To save the description, choose "System->List->Save->Local File
(Unconverted)".
2. Corresponding system log
Display the system log by calling transaction SM21.
Restrict the time interval to 10 minutes before and five minutes
after the short dump. Then choose "System->List->Save->Local File
(Unconverted)".
3. If the problem occurs in a problem of your own or a modified SAP
program: The source code of the program
In the editor, choose "Utilities->More
Utilities->Upload/Download->Download".
4. Details about the conditions under which the error occurred or which
actions and input led to the error.
User and Transaction
Client.............. 010
User................ "STECURRY"
Language Key........ "E"
Transaction......... " "
Transactions ID..... "4D250E9ADDFB00BDE10080000A041004"
Program............. "CL_NW7_VIEW_ELEMENT_ADAPTER===CP"
Screen.............. "SAPMHTTP 0010"
Screen Line......... 2
Information on Caller ofr "HTTPS" Connection:
Plug-in Type.......... "HTTPS"
Caller IP............. "10.6.4.220"
Caller Port........... 443
Universal Resource Id. "/sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/ZEM_INV_APP_ASSIGNMENTS/"
Information on where terminated
Termination occurred in the ABAP program "CL_NW7_VIEW_ELEMENT_ADAPTER===CP" -
in "DISPATCH_NW7_EVENT".
The main program was "SAPMHTTP ".
In the source code you have the termination point in line 5
of the (Include) program "CL_NW7_VIEW_ELEMENT_ADAPTER===CM004".
Source Code Extract
Line
SourceCde
1
METHOD dispatch_nw7_event.
2
DATA: l_event_handler TYPE REF TO if_wdr_nw7_event_handler.
3
4
l_event_handler = get_nw7_event_handler( i_event_handler_id ).
>>>>>
assert l_event_handler is not initial.
6
7
" View-based Delta Rendering: tracking of client events
8
raise event on_nw7_handle_event
9
exporting
10
event_handler = l_event_handler
11
event_name    = i_event_name.
12
13
14
l_event_handler->handle_event(
15
i_event_name       = i_event_name
16
i_event_parameters = i_event_parameters
17
i_update_data      = i_update_data
18
i_event_queue      = i_event_queue ).
19
ENDMETHOD.
- I have cut the dump to make it short and clear.
One of my colleague ran a HTTP watch trace and I am attaching it as well.
<body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%"> <tr> <td> <h1> Error when processing your request </h1> <br> <h2> What has happened? </h2> <p> The URL https://uswasspq.deloitte.com:/sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/ZEM_INV_APPROVER_MAIN//ucfLOADING was not called due to an error. </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td class="emphasize"> <strong> Note </strong> <br> <ul> <li> The following error text was processed in the system SPQ : <b> User session (HTTP/SMTP/..) closed after timeout </b> </li> </ul> <ul> <li> The error occurred on the application server usuxc204_SPQ_01 and in the work process 1 . </li> </ul> <ul> <li> The termination type was: ERROR_MESSAGE_STATE </li> </ul> <ul> <li> The ABAP call stack was: <br> Method: PREPROCESS_REQUEST of program CL_WDR_CLIENT_ABSTRACT_HTTP===CP<BR>Method: IF_HTTP_EXTENSIONHANDLE_REQUEST of program CL_WDR_MAIN_TASK==============CP<BR>Method: EXECUTE_REQUEST_FROM_MEMORY of program CL_HTTP_SERVER================CP<BR>Function: HTTP_DISPATCH_REQUEST of program SAPLHTTP_RUNTIME<BR>Module: %_HTTP_START of program SAPMHTTP<BR> </li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> </p> <h2> What can I do? </h2> <ul> <li> If the termination type was RABAX_STATE, then you can find more information on the cause of the termination in the system SPQ in transaction ST22. </li> </ul> <ul> <li> If the termination type was ABORT_MESSAGE_STATE, then you can find more information on the cause of the termination on the application server usuxc204_SPQ_01 in transaction SM21. </li> </ul> <ul> <li> If the termination type was ERROR_MESSAGE_STATE, then you can search for more information in the trace file for the work process 1 in transaction ST11 on the application server usuxc204_SPQ_01 . In some situations, you may also need to analyze the trace files of other work processes. </li> </ul> <ul> <li> If you do not yet have a user ID, contact your system administrator. </li> </ul> <br/> <p class="note"> Error code: ICF-IE-https -c: 010 -u: STHUGHES -l: E -s: SPQ -i: usuxc204_SPQ_01 -w: 1 -d: 20110208 -t: 131808 -v: ERROR_MESSAGE_STATE -e: User session (HTTP/SMTP/..) closed after timeout </p> <br/> <p> HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error <br/> <p> Your SAP Internet Communication Framework Team </p> </td> </tr> </table> </body> </html>
After this error a URL is called form the WebDynpro to the following html page.
https://uswasspq.deloitte.com/sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/zem_inv_approver_main/dps_Error_Page.html ( this is the friendly message we have put so that the user does not see the dump on his screen.
I tried invalidating the nodes in the WDDOEXIT at the view level but it did not help. This is a show stopper for the project to go live.
Thanks,
Guru.

Hi Guru,
It is not readable the way you posted and that might be the reason that you do not get reactions.
Can you please confirm the following.
1. Is this problem occurs with out portal when you run the application standalone in SAP GUI.
2. What is going on wddoinit method or wddomodify method, any resource handling there ?

Image Settings not working when exporting in Lightroom v1.3.1

When I try to export Images in Lightroom v1.3.1 to jpeg the image settings do not work. Example: Color space - SRGB, resize to fit checked, long edge set to 10in and resolution set to 250 gives me a image of 24in X 34in @ 72ppi. If I do nothing but save as a tiff I get 8in X 10in @ 250ppi. It works fine for everything except JPEG. Help please!

If you care about the resolution tag, do not check "minimize metadata". Otherwise your 24x36@72 ppi is EXACTLY the same image as a 10" long dimension image @250 ppi, because they are both 2500 pixels in the long dimension. Lightroom scaled your image correctly in other words, it just neglected to write the silly resolution metadata tag to your file, which it only writes to jpegs when you do not check the minimize metadata checkbox. The only thing that matters is the number of pixels. P.S. if you really want a 4x5 ratio image, you'll first need to crop it in Develop. The 24x36 implies it is still at a 2x3 ratio.

Get too small pictures when exporting from Lightroom

I shoot in both cr2 (23 MB) and Small-jpeg. Afterwards I upload the pictures to Lightroom and have the appear in the catalog as one picture. Here I make all the editing and when I export the picture back to my harddrive as a jpeg I can only get a file of 3-500 kb. I know I have made some croping - but not that much. It is like Lightroom is working on the jpeg picture and not my cr2 picture. Do anyone have a clue to what I am doing wrong? It may be a setting?

Lisbeth Bech wrote:
Hi
Here is a screendump of the export dialog box
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ht380sf9irk6gmt/Screenshot%202013-11-26%2019 .22.40.png
The size of the cr2 file i 21 MB (and it has a jpeg sister of 930 kb) - and the picture is cropped - but how do I read the cropped dimension? As I am shooting bird picture I normally crop a lot - but my picture are still of an ok size
I can see your screenshot, and looking at the actual pictures that were exported (thumbnails in the filmstrip at the bottom) helps understand why the jpg files are small: your pictures are mostly a smooth blue background (sky) with a tiny bird in the picture. These files are highly compressible in the jpg format, as there isn't a lot of detail in them. I would expect that the resulting file size would be rather small, even if the original files were large.

Receiving an error report when exporting from Lightroom - Why?

I use Lightroom, always have. Started editing on a new computer (given to me by an associate as my computer has crashed) - the specs are sufficient to run Lightroom, and 9/10 times it gives me an error message that says it can't export photos. Every once in a while it will actually export the photo, but there's no rhyme or reason to it - Please help.
The error message only says "Not enough memory" - no other details, no nothing.

Hi,
minimum requirements are from sales people, optimal ones form the working people...
Try to close all other (backgroud) programs.
Which camera you are using? Try to export with diffent settings. (Why only @60 when you want to print?, Why sharpen for Mate if you want to e-mail?) If you want to print, I would use TIFF. Try to export images in smaler packages (2x 50 pictures, instead of one 100 pictures job).
Try to disable the wateramarking.

Colour shift when exporting from lightroom 5 into Photoshop CS6

Hi there,
Having a really weird problem in Lightroom/Photoshop that no amount of Googling can seem to fix.
When I grade an image for colour in lightroom, and then use the "edit in" function to send the file to Photoshop, the file is a completely different colour.
Here's an example:
I'm using SRGB for both Lightroom and Photoshop, and the "preserve embedded profiles" is selected for RGB, CMYK, and gray.
If anyone can shed some light on this, it would be great. I don't want to have to use ProPhotoRGB, because most of my work is delivered online.
Thanks in advance
John

I am also having this issue with the "Merge to HDR Pro" function in both LR5.2 and PSCC. When the image is viewed at 50% image size in the HDR app everything appears fine. However, once you start to zoom in the image begins to crop out segements starting on the right hand side. See the screen shots below:
Image at 50%
Image at 66%
Image at 100%
MacBook Pro 2.7 GHz Intel Core i7 16GB RAM 512GB SSD (early 2013) NVidia GT650M Mac OS X 10.9

Pixelated images when exporting from Lightroom

I recently switched from A Windows PC to the MBP Retina 15". I imported photos to lightroom from my external hard drive in RAW format to lightroom, edited then exported firstly as jpeg resized to 630 x 420 at 150 dpi. The images came out pixelated so I tried exporting at 300dpi even though the images are for web use. They still came out pixelated. So I tried exporting as .tif files at 300 dpi and still they are coming out pixelated... does anyone know why this would be? The raw files don't look pixelated at all.

[email protected] wrote:
I resized this image to 1200 x 800 and have just cropped a section to show you.
PART I
Viewed at 100%, I see no "pixelation" or any other distortion of any kind whatsoever.
Only a 100% view (1:1) shows you your true image. At smaller percentage views, pixels have to be discarded; at greater percentages pixels have to be made up (invented) by the software.
With the Retina screen you're bound to see very strange things, unless you're using the latest and greatest versions of Photoshop and of your video card, and utilizing the Retina features of the software.
PART II
JPEG is a lousy, lossy format for maintaining image quality. Every single time you open or create and save a JPEG, the image quality deteriorates, no exceptions. Even at the highest quality of compression.
To take a very low resolution JPEG, like you did, and subject it to such a massive enlargement is to ask for demand trouble. Not only are you also magnifying all the JPEG compression artifacts, but you are "inventing" an inordinate amount of pixels.
If you have to enlarge your images often, start with an image file that has NEVER been a JPEG.
PART III
Photoshop performed superbly in your case. That is a remarkably fine enlargement, especially considering the miserly JPEG you started from. Rejoice!

How do I use parentheses instead of dashes when exporting in Lightroom?

I don't always want to replace a photo without warning. Sometimes I like to see the photos side by side. Windows convention uses parantheses for different versions of an image, which keeps the jpegs together and separate from tiffs or other raw images. But Lightroom uses a dash so I get, for example, 20120101-1.jpg. I need it to be 20120101 (1).jpg

You can't.

Assertion Failed alert when exporting in Lightroom 2 BETA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for