Asset po vat calculation problem in MIRO
Hi
when user create asset po ,do MIGO ( GRN is nonvaluvated) and then MIRO
while simulating miro,vat not flowing correctly as in po value its differnt from Po value
BUT,..
When i remove GR base tick from Po and do,MIGO and MIRO,its calculating correctly
why so,any solution ,
Regards
Kailas ugale
Hi sir,
Check account assignment - 'A' settings 'GR non valuated' is not ticked ?
YES its ticked
Whether any excise calculations were involved before VAT
No excise
Regards
Kailas ugale
Similar Messages
-
Regarding vat calculating wrongly in miro
hi,
Issue:Reg: Miro Tax Differences
Tax Codes showing the small differences while doing the MIRO transactions. In all
the three tax codes Vat and Cst shows correctly in the purchase order
levels whereas while doing the Miro transactions the VAT and CST will not
calculate correctly.
As per Bill As per System Calculations
Total Bill Basic Amount 72016 72016 Diff
ExciseR.off 7419 7419 7417.66
Vat @ 5% 3972 3982.49
Total Bill Value 83407 83417.49 10.49
see the vat @ 5% in system it is showing 10.40 rs more in miro. Tax code used is VM(input 10.30% cenvat+5% vat),Condition type used is JVRD, tax procedure used is taxinn
Po details
material Qty Amount
20 301 44548
30 101 16968
40 100 10500
If any details required please revert back
Regards
BadriHi,
check following path
in SPRO-Gene rel-Logistic-ax on goods Movement-India-BASIC SETTING-DETERMINATION OF EXCISE DUTY-CONDITION BASE EXCISE DETERMINATION-CLASSIFY CONDITION TYPE
here check your Vat and CSt condition type is there or not,it should be there .
Regards
Kailas ugale -
Problem in VAT Calculation @ the time of MIRO
Dear All,
We are using the Tax Procedure TAXINN.
When we create a LIV document with ref to a PO using the transaction MIRO & when I check the calculate tax button, the tax amount which is displayed in the Basic data is more than the amount which is displayed in the taxes tab.
For Ex:
Created a PO with the following details.
Total Qty in PO - 10
Base Price - 1000/qty.
BED - 14% - 1400.00
ECS - 2% - 28.00
VAT - 4% - (4% on 11428) - 457.12
So my total Tax = 1885.12 (Including Excise & VAT).
Now when I create a MIRO document the tax amount which gets calculated when I check the Calculate button is 1885.12 (Same as above) in the Taxes tab of MIRO.
But the tax amount which is displayed in the Basic data tab is 1,942.24
Also when I simulated the MIRO entrys the VAT amount which was simulated was - 514.24 & not 457.12 as in PO.
Can anyone please advice on the reason for this mismatch in VAT calculation during the time of MIRO?
Is there any specific settings for VAT in TAXINN ??
Note :
The Excise & VAT are calculated correctly during the time of PO creation. Also I havent maintained any additional VAT condition types for my VAT in the tax procedure.
Awaiting helpful replies.
Regards,
Edited by: SAP FC on Dec 5, 2008 3:44 PMHi All,
Please note that when I removed the VAT condition type JVRD from the Classify condition types settings in IMG then the VAT amount which is calculated in the Basic data tab of MIRO is equal to the actual Tax amount as in PO (Excise + VAT ), but the amount which is displayed in the tax tab of MIRO is less.
Now if I maintain the Classify condition types settings in IMG for my VAT condtn type JVRD then the VAT amount which is calculated in basic data is more than both the PO as well as tax tab in MIRO.
Please note as you all have suggested I tried this after creating a new material & with the newly maintained condition records in FV11.
But still the issue persists..
If anyone have any idea. plz revert.
Regards,
Edited by: SAP FC on Dec 9, 2008 10:23 AM -
Problem in VAT Round off during MIRO
Hi Friends,
I having problem in VAT round off during MIRO. We have created PO with excise +VAT. VAT amount has been rounded off. After GRN, we are trying to post the Invoice in MIRO, the VAT amount shows with Decimal.
We are using TAXINN, in the tax pricing proceedure i have mede 17 for call type for VAT condition type. in OB90 we have mede the rounding rule as 100 for currency INR.
When i create the FI direct invoice using the same Tax code it works fine, but having problem in MIRO. I want the decimal should be rounded to the nearest value.
Can any one help me is there any standard set up where we can arrive this?? OR is it required any user exit??
Regards,
DevaCheck whether you can use the user exit function module KR_USER_EXIT_ROUNDOFF
Regards,
SDNer -
Re: VAT Calculation in UK Localization
Last month I requested help on VAT calculation in UK Localization; for which I received a helpful explanation from Rajiv Agarwalla. Here is the link...
VAT Calculation in UK Localization
Now I require a SDK help on this...
I am creating a Purchase Order through Document object; which gets successfully posted in SAP Business One. But calculated VAT doesnu2019t include terms discount. Somehow it is not referring the cash discount attached with the Payment Terms.
When I opened the created Purchase Order in SAP Business One; and reassign the same Payment Terms then it considers the discount and appropriately calculate the VAT.
Here is the sample code snipu2026
''' <summary>
''' This Proc Adds the Purchase Order in the SAP B1 Application
''' </summary>
''' <remarks></remarks>
Public Sub m_AddDoc()
Dim lobj_Documents As SAPbobsCOM.Documents
Dim lobj_oSbo As SAPbobsCOM.SBObob
Dim lobj_oRecSet As SAPbobsCOM.Recordset
Dim lint_ErrorCode As Integer = 0
Dim lstr_Err As String = ""
Dim lint_ReturnCode As Integer = 0
Dim lstr_ObjKey As String = ""
Try
'Instantiate the Document Object as Purchase Orders
lobj_Documents = B1Connections.diCompany.GetBusinessObject(BoObjectTypes.oPurchaseOrders)
'Instantiate the SBo object
lobj_oSbo = B1Connections.diCompany.GetBusinessObject(BoObjectTypes.BoBridge)
'Instantiate the Recordset Object
lobj_oRecSet = B1Connections.diCompany.GetBusinessObject(BoObjectTypes.BoRecordset)
'Set the Header Information for the Purchase Order
'Set the Card Code for Vendor
lobj_Documents.CardCode = "V10000"
'Set the Confirmation as Yes
lobj_Documents.Confirmed = BoYesNoEnum.tYES
'Set the Type of Document As Item
lobj_Documents.DocType = BoDocumentTypes.dDocument_Items
'Set the DocDate
lobj_oRecSet = lobj_oSbo.GetDueDate("V10000", Today.Date)
'Set the DocDate
lobj_Documents.DocDate = Today.Date
'Set the Document Due Date depending on the Payment Terms set
lobj_Documents.DocDueDate = lobj_oRecSet.Fields.Item(0).Value
'Set the Payment Terms as 2P10Net30 Cash Discount for this is 2%
lobj_Documents.PaymentGroupCode = 3
'Set the Payment Method As Outgoing BT
lobj_Documents.PaymentMethod = "Outgoing BT"
'Set the Lines Details for a single Line
'Set the Item Code
lobj_Documents.Lines.ItemCode = "A00001"
'Set the Unit Price
lobj_Documents.Lines.UnitPrice = 500
'Set the Line Item Qty
lobj_Documents.Lines.Quantity = 1
'Set the Vat Group as I1 (Input Tax) where Tax Percent is 17.5 %
lobj_Documents.Lines.VatGroup = "I1"
'Get the Return Code after adding the Document
lint_ReturnCode = lobj_Documents.Add
If lint_ReturnCode = 0 Then
MsgBox("Purchase Order added successfully")
Else
'Get the Last Error Code
B1Connections.diCompany.GetLastError(lint_ErrorCode, lstr_Err.ToString)
'Display the Error
MsgBox(B1Connections.diCompany.GetLastErrorDescription, MsgBoxStyle.OkCancel)
End If
Catch ex As Exception
'Display the exception
MsgBox(ex.Message.ToString, MsgBoxStyle.OkCancel)
Finally
Gc.collect()
End Try
End Sub
After the Purchase Order gets added I get the following results:-
Line Level Amounts :-
Unit Price :- 500 GBP
Line Discount % :- 0.00
Price After Discount :- 500 GBP
Vat Group :- I1
Gross Price :- 587.50 GBP
Total Lc :- 500 GBP
Tax Amount LC :- 87.50 GBP
Gross Total Lc :- 587.50 GBP
Header Level Amounts :-
Total Bef.Discount :- 500 GBP.
Header Discount :- 0.00 %
Tax :- 87.50 GBP
Total Payment Due :- 587.50 %
But the expected result has to be as follows :-
Unit Price = 500 GBP
Cash Discount Percent :- 2 %
500 - 500*2 % = 490
490 * 17.5 % = 85.75 GBP
So the Tax Amount at the Line level should be 85.75 GBP instead of 87.50 GBP
I would appreciate if someone could review my code and rectify the problem.
Regards,
Jennifer Smith.Still no luck
I was just investigating this and found that;
When I add Purchase Order through SAP Business One application it keeps the applicable terms discount in field u201CVatDscntPru201D table POR1.
But this field is not exposed through SDK Document Lines object. So I am not able to update this field and thatu2019s the reason my tax amount is incorrect.
I am worried about this and donu2019t know how can I calculate the tax appropriately. Can any one please help me out?
Regards,
Jennifer Smith. -
Excise Calculated on Freight MIRO
Dear Gurus,
I am having the issue when Excise duty is being calculated on Freight suggested in PO while doing MIRO, Altough it is not calculated in PO.
I am using the TAXINN Procedure.
Please suggest how to avoid excise calculation on delivery amt in PO at the time of MIRO.
Because most of the time service tax is involved on delivery amt.
PO
PO Value- 1000
BED- 140
ECS- 3
SECS- 1
SUBTOTAL- 1144
VAT- 46
SUBTOTAL- 1190
FREIGHT- 119
TOTAL- 1309
MIGO
STOCK- 1119+
GR/IR 1000-
Freight Clearing 119-
Excise Posted as per PO
MIRO POSTING-
1. Goods-
VENDOR- 1190-
GR/IR- 1000+
CENVAT CLEARING- 144+
VAT- 46+
2. MIRO Freight-
VENDOR- 141-
Freight Clearing 119+
CENVAT CLEARING- 17+
VAT 5+
When i am posting MIRO For Goods items + Planned Delivery Cost still the excise is being calculated on excise amt & the entries are same above........
Please suggest
Thanks
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Dec 16, 2008 4:14 PM
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Dec 16, 2008 4:15 PM
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Dec 17, 2008 7:12 AMhi,
use zero tax code at MIRO for freight clearing.
regards,
sujit -
Hi,
Its concerned to Indian Excise.
<b>Scenario:</b>
1)Tax code contains only 4% VAT & other excise duty is added manually in PO conditions.
2)In PO, VAT Calculation is correct
3)During invoice verifiavtion with ref to PO,Assessable values are flowing to MIRO for all line items of PO.
<b>Error:</b> when appropriate tax code is selected (Only 4% VAT) for each line item in MIRO,VAT value which is being calculated is not exactly equals to 4% instead its diiferent for each line items like 4.19%,4.74%,4.09% and 4.37%.
Can you pls advise,what is reason for this small difference in VAT calculation.
RegdsHi,
I checked in detail,other things are correct.
But one more point is,infact there are 2 POs & 1 Invoice related to above issue.If I try to do MIRO for both POs together this Difference in VAT amount is reflecting as said before,If individual PO is considered for Invoice verification there is no such difference in VAT amount i can post the document.
Regds -
Asset in incomplete while posting invoice MIRO
Hi All,
I have raised an P.O with account assignment 'A' P.O has created but while posting invoice through t.code Miro i am getting the error 'asset co.code xxxx asset no.xxxxxx is incomplete.
let me know were i need to check.Hi Ganee,
The asset for which you are doing MIRO, the error might be due to the following reasons:
1. Check the depreciation Key.
2. Check the Account Determinations (Ao90)
You can do resolve your error.
Regards
VG -
VAT calculation in Import pricing in Africa
Dear Experts,
I'm configuring a Import Pricing procedure for my African client where the Scenario is as mentioned.
1.Cost(Base Price) = 100
2.Insurance = 10
3.Freight =10
4.Customs duty = 10
5. IDF Value = 10
6. Vat = 14% on (12345 i.e on 140)
How can this scenario be mapped? As in Import pricing, Tax code is Zero. And there is no Tax procedure defined in SAP for Africa. If I create a Tax code with 14%, it calculates Tax on the Base price & not on the Total of "Step 1 to 5" as per my requirement.
I have checked a similar scenario for VAT calculation in Import pricing in Thailand. Can it be used? if so with what changes or what are the steps involved to meet the above requirement.
Kindly reply, if any one has worked earlier on this scenario.
Regards
Chitra
Edited by: Chitra H P on Jul 29, 2010 3:22 PMHi Chitra
You are aware I take it that Africa is continent and not a country?
You won't find anything in SAP for "Africa" in the same way that you won't find anything for Asia.
James -
VAT calculation in Import pricing in Tanzania
Dear Experts,
I'm configuring a Import Pricing procedure for my African client(Country - Tanzania) where the Scenario is as mentioned.
1.Cost(Base Price) = 100
2.Insurance = 10
3.Freight =10
4.Customs duty = 10
5. IDF Value = 10
6. Vat = 14% on (12345 i.e on 140)
How can this scenario be mapped? As in Import pricing, Tax code is Zero. And there is no Tax procedure defined in SAP for Africa. If I create a Tax code with 14%, it calculates Tax on the Base price & not on the Total of "Step 1 to 5" as per my requirement.
I have checked a similar scenario for VAT calculation in Import pricing in Thailand. Can it be used? if so with what changes or what are the steps involved to meet the above requirement.
Kindly reply, if any one has worked earlier on this scenario.
Regards
ChitraHi
1.Cost(Base Price) = 100
2.Insurance = 10
3.Freight =10
4.Customs duty = 10
5. IDF Value = 10
6. Vat = 14% on (12345 i.e on 140)
As per the above this can be done in Tax procedure of Africa check the conditions type which you are using in TAX Procedure for all these condition type and go to the subtotal column and enter key 4 then the value of these conditions maintained there will added to BASB condition type inTax procedure which is nothing but gross and the you can have your VAT conditio type if you are using TAX INN procedure then maintain the vat % condition in FV11 or if you are using TAXINJ procedure then you ca create tax code in FTXP & IN that tax code you add VAT conditio as per your requirement. Hope this can helps you.
Regards -
Add field vat registration number in Miro or in me22n
Hi, All.
Maybe somebody know, if it's possible to add ( for change ) vat registration number in miro or in me22n?
Thanks,
LizaUsually the Abaper adds this field to PO ADDITIONAL DATA tab, if it doesnot already exist. Check in ME21n, whether this tab is available in PO, if yes, tell your abaper to add your required field there. If No, tell him to make one for your requirement.
-
Hi friends,
i have a one requirement we are using one line item for vat calculation and second line item for service tax calculation in sales order suppose 100Rs material price and 20Rs labor cost now we are using
VAT calculation 5% on Material amount 100Rs
Service tax 10.3% on labor amount 20Rs
But my client want
1. VAT 5% composite on 120Rs
Service Tax 10.3% on 20Rs
and
2. VAT 5% on 100Rs
Service Tax 4.12% composite on 120Rs
Both cases are there, please guide me how to do it
My pricing procedure
ZTRF Base price
VAT VAT% On Base Price
CST CST% on Base Price
SER Service Tax % on Base Price
ECSS Ecess% On service Tax
HECS HECess% On Service Tax
please guide me is there any changes in pricing procedure
Thanks
SeshuHi
Both the requirements can be met by adding Subtotal column in the pricing procedure
Add the material price and Service charge in the subtotal (from u2013to) and calculate Vat from the subtotal column (Maintain from column as subtotal column number) follow it for second requirement also -
Problem in Miro number range assignment
Dear Gurus,
Iam facing the problem in MIRO generation i have to assign no ranges for miro please assist me how can i assign the miro numberranges.
Regards
Hari kumarHi
For LIV document, maintain number range number, year (may be till 9999) and from & to number u=in transaction OMRJ.
Maintain the number range number for the transactions RD & RJ.
Path: IMG--> Matl mgmt --> LIV --> Incoming invoice --> Number assignment --> Maintain Number Assignment for Logistics Documents
warm regards
sairam akundi -
Facing problem in MIRO posting
Dear Experts:
We are facing problem in MIRO posting for March 2014 entries. When we submit post for a Particular MIRO by giving back date 30.03.2014 then system generating MIRO number but that MIRO number not showing in vendor line item display or document flow. If we go back then system giving below message.
For your kind information I'm also attaching our number range screen shot.
For current period we are not facing any issue. Would you please suggest us what should we do to post MIRO by giving date of March 2014.
Thanks in advance and your kind suggestion is highly appreciated.
Best Regards.
Ripon Kumar PaulIt would be better if you analysis you update termination error in TCode ST22.
Refer following discussion, where I have explained how to analysis this in ST22.
- http://scn.sap.com/message/13915998
Thanks, JP -
Incorrect VAT calculation when a PO is raised.
Hello All,
The value of VAT calculated after a PO is raised is wrong,in my country it is 5% but the system calculates slightly higher than 5%.This is perculiar for PO.Hi,
Please check the Tax Procedures assigned for your country.
Either it is condition based or formula based.
If condition based check with your MM consultant, if it is formula based check your tax code % rates in FTXP.
Thanks & Regards,
Shashi Kanth.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have an iMac and MacBook Pro, both running Snow Leopard at current maintenance levels. I have an HP8500 printer connected via wi-fi. All have been working well until just recently. Now, the iMac cannot communicate with the printer. The printer icon
-
Urgent: ABAP Dump when using ME9F
Hi All, I am using ME9F transaction to re-print POs. I get a short dump stating error "MOVE_TO_LIT_NOTALLOWED_NODATA". This just started happend after we applied the support packs. We are using custom SAP Script form. Did anyone ever experience this
-
Can Mac OS 8 and Mac OS 10.4 Communicate via Ethernet?
I'm trying to find out if an old PPC 7500/100 running OS 8 can talk to a G4 running 10.4. Since OS 8 doesn't support AppleTalk over TCP/IP, it's looking kind of hopeless. Any suggestions? Is it possible, or is the age gap just too wide? Thanks!
-
I currently have the N8 running on T-Mobile, and since I recieved the Symbian Anna update OTA I haven't been able to text my friends who are using Verizon properly. The texts that they recieve are a jumble of words, and sometimes a simply sentence te
-
How do I manage to get the questions back into the raw in the header of the answering view?
Some how the text in the header of the view of answers is gone.. I deleted "answers" we hade made when testing the form, and suddenly the text in the header was gone too. Is there any chance to get it back? To import it somehow from the form back in