Assign Printers at request Level.

Hi,
Everybody...
I have a request to print reports(request) like Reciept,Invoice,report.etc.etc..on different printers.
Like A user has one responsibility,under this responsibility menu he has request set.
Request Set for Invoice,Receipt,Report
Invoice should be printed to a particular printer
Receipt to a particular printer and Report to particular printer.
As i know.
We can assign a printer at Site,Application,Responsibility and User Level.
In my case it is impossible ..
I thought i have to create one Profile viz print by checking responsibility and request id.
If anybody achieve this please help me to overcome with this issue
Thanks,
Alig

Here are few options I can think of-
1. Create separate request sets with separate printer value for each responsiblity. Concurrent programs will be same.
2. Explore option for customization through personalization , use profile/value set/lookups for printer placeholder.
3. Lastly, Create a custom programs for each request set (Invoice, Reports) and write an intelligent logic to pass proper printer value to choose write combinations. use fnd_submit kind of utility.
Regards
<R

Similar Messages

  • No fact table exists at the requested level of detail Error.

    Hi Everybody,
    Facing a issue on the using  Fact less Fact tables.
    Scenario:
    ========
    Using two subject areas to develop a report.OBIEE 11g
    Fact1 --> Compensation Plan Assignments Real Time
    Fact2 --> Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant Details
    On both facts we created dummy metrics on respective table id's and aggregated to ROWCOUNT.
    As i said in earlier we are using the above 2 subject areas to develop reports.
    Logical SQL:
    ===========
    SELECT
    0 s_0, "Incentive Compensation - Compensation Plan Assignments Real Time"."Role"."Role Name" s_1,
    "Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant Details"."Cost Center" s_2,
    "Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant Details"."Country Code" s_3,
    "Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant"."Participant First Name" s_4,
    "Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant"."Participant Last Name" s_5,
    "Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant"."Party Number" s_6
    FROM "Incentive Compensation - Earnings Real Time" FETCH FIRST 65001 ROWS ONLY
    Error Message:
    ==============
    Expression 'RowCount:[DAggr(Fact - Compensation Plan Assignment.RowCount by [ Dim - Participant Details.Cost Center, Dim - Compensation Role.Role Name, Dim - Participant.Participant Name] )]' converted to NULL because [nQSError: 14020] None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request RowCount:[DAggr(Fact - Compensation Plan Assignment.RowCount by [ Dim - Participant Details.Cost Center, Dim - Compensation Role.Role Name, Dim - Participant.Participant Name] )]..
    [2013-10-21T12:18:45.000-05:00] [OracleBIServerComponent] [TRACE:2] [USER-34] [] [ecid: 004uJx90aHO9lZ73VJJNB80007eh000gl_,0:2:1:9:5] [tid: 457c2940] [requestid: f2e001b] [sessionid: f2e0000] [username: [email protected]] -------------------- Query Status: [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail:
    Please share some ideas on this or any guidelines will be very much helpfull.

    Govardhan,
    Did u configured any Dimension Hierarchy please set the levels in that particular Fact LTS.
    For more info,check the below thread
    https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2134934
    Thanks,

  • Cost Assignment Change on Header Level

    This User changed the cost assignment at the top level to an internal order;
    however, it did not apply to one of the hotel charges.
    The other charge on the same date for the same vendor did change.
    What caused the one transaction to remain with a cost center instead of internal order?
    It was our understanding if the User changed the cost assignment at the top level it would be applied to all transactions in the report.  Is this not correct?

    Got the Solution from Development Colleagues:
    If a traveler change the cost assignment from cost object A to cost object B at the top level of an expense report, then all expenses which are assigned to the cost object A at change moment(!) should get the new cost assignment to cost object B.
    All expenses which are assigned to a different cost objects as A will be not changed!
    Example 1:
    Step 1. Traveler created an expense report with the cost assignment to cost center A
    Step 2. Traveler added 3 expenses
    => Expected result: all 3 expenses should get the assignment to the cost center A
    Step 3. Now traveler changed the cost assignment on top level of the meeting request to the project B
    => Expected result: all 3 expenses should get the assignment to the project B
    Example 2:
    Step 1. Traveler created an expense report with the cost assignment to cost center A
    Step 2. Traveler added 3 expenses
    => Expected result: all 3 expenses should get the assignment to the cost center A
    Step 3. Traveler changed manually the cost assignment of one expense to internal
    order D
    => Expected result: 2 expenses are assigned to the cost center A and one expense is assigned to the internal order D (because of manually change!)
    Step 4. Now the traveler changed the cost assignment on top level of meeting request from the cost center A to project B
    => Expected result: only 2 expenses which were assigned to the project A are now assigned to the project B, the one expense which was assigned to the internal order D should be still assigned to the internal order D (it is not assigned to the cost center A and therefore not affected by the change from cost center A to project B).

  • OBIEE 11g - No fact table exists at the requested level of detail

    My dimesion tables are snow-flake.
    Table1 has Key, ProductName, ProductSize, Table2Key
    Table2 has Key, ProductDepartment, Table3Key
    Table3 has Key, ProductDivision
    I have created 2 hierarchies (in same dimension Product). Note: ProductSize is in Table1.
    ProductDivision > ProductDepartment > ProductName (shared level)
    ProductSize > ProductName (shared level)
    There are 2 fact tables
    Fact1 is at ProductName level
    Fact2 is at ProductDepartment level
    When I create a request with columns as ProductSize and some measure; and filter it on ProductDepartment. The request fails with error "No fact table exists at the requested level of detail", but the request can ideally be answered using fact with ProductName level.
    I have properly defined logical level keys in the hierarchies and logical level in the LTS (content tab)
    Can anyone point me what I am doing wrong here?

    Since both fact tables are at same granular level I would suggest to map each other (Signon_A maping Signon_B) in BMM layer logical fact @source.
    Considering them as Fact and with fact extension.
    BTW: Did you try by setting implicit fact at subject area properties?
    Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Feb 1, 2013 9:04 AM

  • [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail:

    Hi All,
    I am using OBIEE 11.1.1.6.8.
    I have below senario...My fact table contains 3 LTS(yearly, Monthly, Weekly) and TimeDim contains3 LTSs(yearly, Monthly, Weekly)
    Fact-Weekly joins with (D1,D2,D3) & TimeDimWeekly
    Fact-Monthly joins with (D1,D2,D3) & TimeDimMonthly
    Fact-Yearly joins with (D1,D2,D3) & TimeDimYearly
    I hv also set the Fact source content to appropriate level of TimeDIM and details level of other Dimensions.
    when i build a report using only year_code or month_code_or week_code as filter the query is going to appropriate physical sources
    ie. if i take week_code as filter then the query firing to FactWeek, TimeDimWeekly & other Dimensions
    if i take Month_code as filter then the query firing to FactMonthk, TimeDimMonthly & other Dimensions
    Problem is when I use dynamic filter its is giving [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail: error.
    My filter is something like this using presentation variable pvTime (filter is prompted)
    case '@{pvTime}'
    when 'Weekly' Then "Calendar"."Week - WYYYY"
    when 'Monthly' Then "Calendar"."Month - MONYYYY"
    when 'Yearly' Then "Calendar"."Year ID" end
    Please help me if I missed any step
    Thanks
    Smita

    Its a guess but try the below.. As you are using the CASE statement in your filter, use it in the below way.
    Store the value that is prompted into a presentation Variable
    YOUR WAY
    case '@{pvTime}'
    when 'Weekly' Then "Calendar"."Week - WYYYY"
    when 'Monthly' Then "Calendar"."Month - MONYYYY"
    when 'Yearly' Then "Calendar"."Year ID" end
    SUGGESTED WAY
    (case '@{pvTime}'='Weekly' and "Calendar"."Week - WYYYY" = '@{new PV}' THEN 1
    when '@{pvTime}'='Monthly' and "Calendar"."Month - MONYYYY" = '@{new PV}' THEN 1
    when '@{pvTime}'='Yearly'  and "Calendar"."Year ID" = '@{new PV}' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) =1
    This might correct the way your are using your CASE statement in Filters..

  • No fact table exists at the requested level of detail

    We have two fact tables F1,F2 and D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 dimensions.
    They are connected line this.
    F1 to D1, D2, D3 and self dimension D_of_F1
    F2 to D2, D3 and self dimension D_of_F2
    Means D2 and D3 are common dimensions between two facts.
      D_of_F1
             |
             |
    D1--F1--D2
             |      |
             |      |
            D3   |
            |       |
            |       |
            |-F2-|
            |
            |
            |
       D_of_F2
    Hierarchies
    H1 for D1
    H2 for D2
    H3 for D3
    H_of_F1 for D_of_F1
    H_of_F2 for D_of_F2
    and pinned LTS of F1 --> H1 detail, H2 Detail,H3 Detail, H_of_F1 Detail
    and pinned LTS of F2 --> H2 Detail,H3 Detail, H_of_F2 Detail
    We are selecting these columns
    D1.C1, D1.C2, D2.C1, D2.C2,D3.C1 and report works perfactly.
    But when I add D_of_F2.C1 then report gives this error
    Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail
    Please help me to solve this error....
    I m new in OBIEE concepts so not able to trubleshoot...
    Thank you.

    i'm try to do an analysis between two tables (that have a relatinship), we had inclued first the FACTURA.FACTURA_COD, then columns from COBRANCAS and it work's. When we inclued the FACTURA.COMISSIONISTA_ID it return the fowlling error :check the level set in content tab in fact table.it can happen that FACTURA.COMISSIONISTA_ID is at a lower level than specified in fact table.
    Regards,
    Sandeep

  • No Fact Table Exists at the request level of Detail

    Hi,
    I'm new to BI.can anybody come across more than one fact table in BMM layer,currently i working with AP module,i am getting the error Error NO:14025 No Fact Table Exists at the request level of Detail.
    Even i check with content tab where i have given detail level for confirming tables and total for non-confirming tables.
    can any one have document related more than fact table in BMM layer, any body give me the right solution.
    Thanks in advance !

    thanks for your response,i did for the selected measures also. in Account payable model i have two fact.
    F1 with dimension D1,D2,D3,D4
    F2 with Dimension D5,D6,D7,D8
    when i'm trying to generate reports F1 with D1,D2,D3,D4 i am getting the output,but with the non-conforming table D5,D6,D7 i am getting the error. can you give some document to work more than 1 fact table.

  • No fact table at the requested level error.

    I have one dimension
    Account
    Two fact tables
    Threshold and Transaction
    These tables are joined to the Account Dim using Account Number.
    Now when I create an analysis using Account Numbers from all three tables, it says no fact table at the requested level. If I include any other fact from both the fact tables, it populates null. It works right when I create an analysis from one dimension and either of the fact tables.
    Why do we get this error and how else should it be modeled.
    Edited by: 979130 on Dec 29, 2012 12:52 AM

    I'm not sure about your data.. I give couple of options try them out any of one should work.
    Assuming both facts are at same granular: You need to create Logical Fact table in BMM add first fact as source then, open properties wizard and add other fact table.
    Assuming both facts are at Different or Same granular: You need to create Logical Fact table in BMM add first fact and then add 2nd fact as 2nd logical table source and set the content tab for both facts
    Using any of the option you'll be going for metrics and use them in report.
    In general: You need to let BI server let know how data is spread across tables so that BI Server can respond as you expected.
    Hope this helps, Appreciate if you mark as correct/helpful
    Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Dec 29, 2012 12:58 PM

  • No fact table exists at the requested level

    Hi,
    I have a 3 dimension tables and D_CANDIDATE, D_QUALIFICATION, D_SERIES. D_CANDIDATE is linked with D_QUALIFICATION and D_SERIES. If i create a analysis with all the 3 dimensions i am getting this error. no fact table exists at the requested level. When i remove D_SERIES from the analysis it is fine. What i might have done wrong. Can anyone help me out please.
    Regards,
    Natesh

    So I'm assuming your joins are like
    D_CANDIDATE--> D_QUALIFICATION
    D_CANDIDATE--> D_SERIES
    Then treat D_CANDIDATE as logical fact in BMM and use reports, it is nice to have default hierarchies for D_QUALIFICATION and D_SERIES. in this case D_QUALIFICATION and D_SERIES are logical dimension tables in BMM
    Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Apr 4, 2013 8:05 AM

  • No fact table exists at the requested level of detai error

    Hi Gurus,
    Gud Evening,
    There is a report with 10 columns and its coming fine when ever we are adding new column some date column (Start Date) it is showing the below error
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail:
    Can any give some suggestions..
    Regards

    Hi,
    You have to go to the fact LTS and set granularity for each dimension associated with it. You might be bringing a column from a dimension in your report, for which you didn't set up granularity in the facts LTS.
    Thanks
    Venkat
    OBIEEDeveloper

  • OBI Joining two lookup tables. [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail

    Hello,
    I basically have only fact tables that I need for my analysis. No dimensions, no hierarchies.
    When add two tables in OBI Answers to start the analysis I see this error:
    [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail
    I have them defined as lookup tables. How can I join lookup tables?
    In order to pre-filter them using the user_name session variable.

    Hi Nagireddy.
    As described:
    open your rpd. go to "manage" -> Variable Manager / New / Session / Variable.  so to create a new session variable in the .rpd.
    then you create a variable NO_FORCE_TO_DETAIL_BIN and se the default to 1.
    BUT....this did actually not do the trick
    I have created a logical table that is a table made up of the two that I just want to join and as soon as I create a bi answers report that contain columns from those two tables I see the  error 14025.

  • How to assign profiles at user level  ?

    hello every body.....i have created 2 users say x , y
    and i have assigned them general ledger responsibilty.....
    .at site level profile Gl set of books name is vision operation..
    .now i have assigned Gl set of books profile to user x at user level
    as vision china...and to user y as vision germany.....when i login with
    different user name with gl responsibilty ......after navigating
    to----journal-->enter--->new journal----for both users iam getting the
    same currency which is at sit level...i thought for x user the currency
    will be china currency
    and for y user it will be germany curreny which i hav assigned at user level....
    please help me regarding this.......
    thanks and regars
    imran

    Hi,
    i have assigned it at user level then why iam i
    getting the currency code of site level ?Did you user to logout and login again after setting the profile option at the user level?
    What if you set this profile option at the site/application/responsibility level, can you reproduce the issue then?
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • How to assign one JSP request object to another JSP

    Hi,
    I want to assign one JSP request object (i.e., previous JSP Page request object) to another JSP (i.e., current JSP page request object).
    I don't want to use "<jsp:forward>" tag or "RequestDispatcher" obect here.
    Because i want to display one message in the current JSP page, before sending both JSP pages' request to a servlet. How to do this ?
    please help
    Thanks in advance
    Vishnu

    You cannot assign a request and response object of one jsp/servlet to another, every jsp or a servlet get is own fresh copy of request and response object with the request parameter data from the previous page.
    Unless u use request dispatcher or jsp:forward action, this solution that u r looking for by re-assigning the request and response object doesn't work

  • Changes in the request level

    Dear Experts,
    can you please tell me the reason for the below changes in the request level.
    Step1)
    Once I executed the Info package till 5 to 6 hours atleast one record will not update and the request will be in yellow .
    Step 2)
    Then suddenly the request will become red and atleast one record will not update and the message will be as:--
    Diagnosis: No Errors found the current process has probably not yet finihed.
    System responce : The ALE of Inbox is identical to the ALE outbox of the source sytem
    or
    The maximum wait time for thiis request has not been exeeded.
    or
    The background job has not yet finished in the source sytem.
    Step 3)
    Then after some time suddenly around 800 records will come and the request also wil become yellow and the message will be as same as above.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Suresh.

    Hi Suresh,
    Check the trend of the data load requests from this datasource.
    There are few possibilities like :
    1) If all the requests are taking this much time,then your extractor is taking time based on the logic written to extract data from the base tables.
    2) If this perticular load request is taking time,then check the selections you have given in the infopackage to fetch the data
    The reason for turning it to yellow,red and again yellow is :
    The maximum wait time given for the IP is exceeded.When the job in source is running its yellow,if exceeded the time limit,it is red in BW but yellow in source.Once the records are fetched, system sets the technical status to yellow again and then in turn to green once job is source system is finished.
    Hope this helps !!
    Regards,
    Yogita.

  • Auto Assignement of Service Request to Engineers in CRMOD

    Hi all,
    We have a requirment where client wants us to do Auto Assignement of Service Request to engineers based upon the availibility and workload of engineer.
    For Example: If there are XX number of SR assigned to Engineer1 , then assign the new SR to Engineer2
    Also if the Engineer 2 has no bandwidth then assign it to Engineer 3
    Could you help me with some workaround for this in OD. Or if there any partner product who provides this functionality
    Thanks & Regards,
    Suchita

    I have done this using Web Services / Java applying it to Team Member assignments for Opportunity. It would be a 90% plus fit that would have to be modified to apply to SRs. The rules are configurable by users as the rules are stored in a custom object in CRM On Demand. It is pretty slick and has been in production for about a year. It is a high volume client in a multi-tenent environment.
    You can write any rules that you want and the most used rules are the ones that balance work load across users that have the same role (round robin assignments). There are other rules that assign by availability based on the calendar, shifts, skills, etc. the sky is the limit.
    To create a new rule type requires writing a new method in java and adding the rule to the custom object. It is very flexible and extendable. The customer that is using it is extremely pleased with it.
    Edited by: eSteege on Aug 8, 2012 10:58 PM

Maybe you are looking for