Assign vacation rules to group

hi,
somebody please guide me to setup vacation rules for a group.And reassign a user's role to a group when the user is on vacation in Workflow.
thanks
yesukannan

Thanks a lot bobb for reply!
With user you mean "login user" or "contact"? If i use login user as group i loose license :)
Why i want to assign to group (eg SYSTEMS) is that group members should get notification email and one of group member need to
pick up SR#. Also all other users must see SR# assigned to group even if they are not member of this group.
Thanks,

Similar Messages

Setup vacation rules for group in workflow.

hi,
somebody please guide me to setup vacation rules for a group.And reassign a user's role to a group when the user is on vacation in Workflow.
thanks
Jamras

Job,
Put your issue with workflow forum or Apps forum http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=40
--Shiv

Automatic Tasks are assigning to the user even the Vacation rule Enabled

Hi Experts,
I have enabled a Vacation rule in bpm/workspace.
But I can see all the tasks assigned in the inbox for that user.
Then I have enabled the Customized rule as the vacation rule and tried to reassign the tasks to an another user.
That is also not happening. Tasks are assigning to the other user.
Our ECM version is 11.1.1.6.0
Went through all the documentations and couldn't find the solution..
Thanks,
Nir

Hi Nir,
When you said
But I can see all the tasks assigned in the inbox for that user.
do you mean the instances that were previously assigned to the user are still there in the user's queue?
Vacation rules let you reassign or delegate tasks assigned to a user once the vacation period begins. If work items are already in their queue before the vacation rule goes into effect, they remain in the person's queue. It's up to the user to reassign or delegate the existing work item instances that were already in their queue.
New instances that arrive once the rule goes into effect however, should be automatically reassigned (or delegated depending on the vacation rule's radio button selected) to the other person.
Dan Atwood

How to know whether a vacation rule is set for a user

Hi,
How to know whether a vacation rule is set for a user or not in the BPM process. Can anyone help me in this.
Thanks,

In Linux a user has to have read permission on a file to even see that it exists. As a result, if a user (or a group to which they belong) doesn't have read access to the file File.exists() will return false. Windows which doesn't have as tightly controlled access to files will admit that a file exists whether it can be read or not.
PS.
This is proof that I should never answer a question off the top of my head when I haven't had my red bull yet. This is wrong. You will be able to see it if you have read and execute on the directory.
thumps self in head
Message was edited by:
puckstopper31

Setting up vacation rules from Mass Timecard Approval Responsibilty.

Our users are using the Mass Timecard Approval for Oracle OTL to approve timecards. This does not however seem to have a link to set up vacation rules. It seems they can only do this from their workflow homepage however we don't want to have to re-assign everyone a different responsibility.
I tried just adding the workflow function to the Mass Timecard Approval menu however when I tried to access it says not available from this responsibility (or something similar) - I think this is because it is a self service responsibility.
Anyone any ideas?
Thanks

Hi,
Are you using OTL Approval Formulas?
If not, you can shift to this style.
In your OTL Approval Formula, you can check, if person has any vacation rule set, if so you can redirect approval notification based on the rule set.
Regards,
Ashish Shah

FM/RFC to assign specialisation of module group to a student

Hi,
I am trying with FM:HRIQ_SPECIALIZATION_INSERT_RFC to assign specialisation of module group to a student, when i pass Student Id, Object ID of Study Object (CS),Program ID,Module groupId, Module Group Category, am getting error "Combination of academic specializations is not allowed".
what could be the issue? pls suggest.
Thanks & Regards
Khaleed

Dear Khaleed,
Please (check) make sure you conducted all of customizing steps in relation to the SC, CG and allowed combinations of specialisations in the progam catalog
Before you can offer specializations, you must perform the following preparatory steps:
1. Set up module group variant/category combinations (both in IMG steps and PIQ_ACSTRUC)
2. Define the relevant module group categories as a u201Cspecializationu201D (by setting the flag in the customizing table).
3. Assign a module group variant to the program of study (Program data tab page of the object SC).
4. Link module groups to the program of study which reflects the required module group categories.
When you have performed the above steps, you can maintain the allowed combinations of module groups in the SLCM Menu -> `Environment` u2192 Maintain acad. specializations in the `program catalog` (=PIQ_ACSTRUC)
This function allows you to define the rules for valid and invalid specialization combinations for each of your programs of study. For example, you may have a B.A. program that requires students to select a major and a minor: With this function, you can explicitly define the major/minor combinations that are not permitted (e.g. Math Major and Math Minor).
Note: You do not have to explicitly define all allowed combinations.
br
Rob

Cisco ASA: Assign same rule sets to multiple interfaces

Hi guys,
We want to connect to physical interfaces from ASA to each Nexus core, so is there any possibility to assign same rule set to both interfaces simultaneously? (a kind of zone aggregation).
Regards.
Jesus

Hi
What is Your ASA Code running on your ASA appliance , From ASA code 8.3 you can have global access rule .
lobal access rules.
8.3(1)
Global access rules were introduced.
The following command was modified: access-group.
Interface access rules are bound to any interface at the time of their creation. Without binding them to an interface, you can not create them. This differs from the Command Line example. With CLI, you first create the access list with the access listcommand, and then bind this access list to an interface with the access-group command. ASDM 6.3 and later, the access list is created and bound to an interface as a single task. This applies to the traffic flowing through that specific interface only.
Global access rules are not bound to any interface. They can be configured through the ACL Manager tab in the ASDM and are applied to the global ingress traffic. They are implemented when there is a match based on the source, the destination, and the protocol type. These rules are not replicated on each interface, so they save memory space.
When both these rules are to be implemented, interface access rules normally takes the precedence over the global access rules.
HTH
Sandy

Any report to check vacation rule for users?

any report to check vacation rule for users?

Hello Anand,
there is no report but you may use the production order info system with list "components" and create a layout contaning the issued quantity and/or the final issue indicator. With a correct sorting, the list should show all orders with non-issued components at the top.
Regards, Andreas

Approvals performed through Vacation Rules

Hi there,
I'm trying to build a query report to show same data as PO Action History does but need to add or show user name that had performed any approval as a delegated of main approval user. Which table or view has these data?
Thank you for your help
Regards,

Hi Sudhakar,
It's a application standard functionality. You need to enable the worklist personalization. Do the following steps to enable the worklist.
1. Log in to the application.
2. Click on the Personalization link( before this you need to enable the 1. Personalize Self Service Definition – Yes 2. FND: Personalization Region Link – Yes profile options for your user).
3. Click on the Complete view and then Expand all then search for the "Row Layout: Home Content Row" and click on the personalization torch.
4. Make this rendered at the site level and click apply.
5. Navigate back to the application, now you can view the Worklist in the application.
I hope this will help you to enable the Worlist access and vacation rules.
Thanks and Regards,
Joshna.

Vacation Rule not working as expected

In Oracle business process workspace(PS5) the Vacation Rule is not properly working. Even vacation Rule has been activated to delegate the process instances to another user the process instances are being send to that user. Has anybody able to define vacation rules successfully.. If so could u please share the steps? Thanks.

Any help please ?

Why the PO action history is not updating when i perform the vacation rules

Hi,
Can any one explain why the action history is not updating when performed the vacation rules using the below example
Example: A >B>C>D are in the approval hierarchy here I have defined the vacation rules by login to the user C here I selected the item type as “All” and delegated to D.
Now the buyer “A” has sent the document for approval. The user “B” can successfully reserve funds and approved the document. Now the document is automatically delegated to D. Here D can open the document from open notifications and approved the document. Now when I checked the Action history here I cannot find the performed name D who has actually approved the document.
Note:we are using the 11.5.10.2 version.
The Action History in the following manner
Seq Action Performed By
================================
4 Approve C
3 Forward B
2 Reserved B
1 Forward A
0 Submit A
From the above action history why the user D name is not showing. Can any one let me know ASAP?
Regards,
Keivn.
Edited by: user10960960 on May 5, 2009 3:36 AM

When you set up the vacation rule, if you simply delegate the ownership to D, then C retains the ownership and the approval occurs with C's limits. And hence D is treated as the approver.
If you transfer the ownership, then C is out of the picture. The notification goes to D and when he/she approves, D's limits kick in and he will be seen as approver.
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi

Vacation Rule works for ALL but not for particular notification in Item typ

Hi,
I have a situation where Vacation Rule is Ignored when choose the select option in notification page of vacation rule and notifications were being sent to Original Approver (who created the vacation Rule) instead of delegate.
Vacation rule is working perfectly when choose the notification as ALL but is not working when given a particular message(Timecard Approved,Approve Requisition).
Below is some example of this inconsistent behavior:
1. Selected Item type as OTL Workflows for Employees, For this Item Type there are 3 Notifications as
TIMECARD_APPROVED,ERROR_MESSAGE,TIMECARD_APPROVAL_INLINE in select opition.
If i select the TIMECARD_APPROVAL_INLINE notifications are going to delegate, and for TIMECARD_APPROVED not going to delegate.
2. Selected PO Approval, It contains only one Notification(PO_PO_APPROVE). So it is working fine.
3 Selected PO Requisition Approval,it contains the 4 notifications.
PO_REQ_APPROVE_SIMPLE_JRAD, PO_REQ_APPROVE,PO_REQ_INVALID_FORWARD,PO_REQ_NO_APPROVER.
If i select the PO_REQ_APPROVE_SIMPLE_JRAD notifications are going to delegate, and for PO_REQ_APPROVE not going to delegate.
Any inputs on this.
Version 11.5.10.2 RUP 6.
Regards,
Ajith

Hi,
on problem I spot is that all your components created by the forEach loop have the same ID value. I suggest you change the ID to e.g. id="soc_#{item.index}" for zhe select one choices. In addition, I don't see where you refresh components after the change
Frank

How to Find what all GL assigned to Particular account group ???

Hi !!! anybody can help me in this issue ... How to Find what all GL assigned to Particular account group ???

Hi,
Go to SE16
Give table name SKA1.
Give COA
Give account group and execute.
All the GL accounts that were assigned to this group are listed.
Reward points.
Sarma

Webmail Vacation Rule - Mass spam

We have seen this issue several times now if one of our users enables an existing vacation rule (created in the client) in webmail it will go through and send an email to several (if not hundreds/thousands) of people they have corresponded with within the last month or so. These are not new conversations that are coming in. I can't pinpoint exactly how far back it goes. When we get notified we go in and remove the rule in web access and retract at least all of the internal emails that have gone out. Has anyone else seen this issue before? Is there a way to disable enabling rules in webmail till this gets addressed? Seems if they enable the rule in the client it works properly.
Thanks,
Nathan

Hi Nathan,
Unfortunately this has been reported before. I believe, but stand to be corrected, this happens when the customer clicks on the "Run" button. I'm not sure if there is a fix for this, but it might be worth contacting Novell Technical Support.
Let us know how it goes.
Cheers,

Agent assignment for a task group

Hi,
I have created a TAsk group which has two workflows inside. But when go for the agent assignment for the task group via OOCU tcode, it is not showing the workflows under the task group.
Plz let me know wht may be the problem...
Thanks,
Sivagami

Hi,
I am not able to assign agent through task customization [ OOCU Tcode ]. But I am able to assign in PFTC tcode.
Any clues?
Thanx,
Sivagami

Assign vacation rules to group

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for