Assign Valuation Class to Company Code

Hi Gurus...
Quick Question: we are migrating from R3 to ECC 6. One of Treasury Management config points is Valuation Class definition. R3 used to have a config point in IMG called Assign Valuation Class to Company Code/Transaction Type. But I cannot find same in ECC6. Even CTRL-F does not help. Did it get moved and renamed?
Thanks,
JS

Hi,
Don't know the IMG path but what you can try:
1. Go to the required IMG transaction in R/3 and look up the table / view (click on a field in the IMG transaction / push F1 / click icon Technical Information)
2. In ECC 6 go to transaction SM30, fill in the table / view name from step 1
3. Click icon Customizing
4. In pop-up click Continue w/o Specifying Project
5. An overview appears with IMG config points where the specified table / view is maintained. Choose the appropiate one by double clicking.
Prerequisite is the existence of an IMG activity exists for object maintenance.
Regards,
Andre

Similar Messages

Assign asset class to company code

Hi All
Where to assign asset class to particular company code.
Thanx in advance
prasad

Hi,
1. IMG-FA-Asset Acc-Account Class
- Specify Account Determination
-Create Screen layout rules
-Define no range
-Define asset class
2. IMG-FA-Asset Acc-Integration of asset acc and GL
-assign GL acc
regards,
Sridevi
<i><b>Award points, if useful</b></i>

Error during assignment of plant to company code

hi all,
i am using sap r/3 4.7.
I defined a plant 1000. then i am trying to assign it to company code 1000 (created by copying it from company code 0001).
when i tried to assign plant 1000 to company code 1000 it is giving error as..
"enter numeric values only"...
the message i received is...
Message no. TK455
Diagnosis
The value " " was entered in the field "LNUMBER".
This is not possible because it is a numeric field where only numbers may be entered.
The length of the field is 000004.
System Response
The entry was not accepted.
Procedure
Enter only numeric values in this field.
field number "LNUMBER" is a data element of table " UMODREL" (package- SUMO). it contains one entry and that is 0001 for field number LNUMBER. there is no difference to the error if i delete that entry or if i make changes to that entry.
rest all assignments are completed without any problem.
someone told me to check SAP Note 547875.
i am a learner and does not have access to service.sap.com.
if some one can give me username and password of that site i might find some solution there. (as well as support packages)
waiting for positive response....

Here is the note; You have to implement the suppost pack SAPKH47026
check in your system that you are up to what support pack
to chech that go to system-status-click on the mangifying glass
this will open component information popup
here you can see the support pack detail for SAP_APPL version 4.7
Symptom
When you use Transaction EC01 to delete or copy a company code delivered by SAP, the system issues error message TK455.
Other terms
TNIW5, V_NIW5, TK455, EC01
Reason and Prerequisites
The problem is caused by an error in Customizing.
The TNIW5 Customizing table is a table with delivery class = C (= Maintenance only by customers - No SAP import). SAP has delivered entries in the TNIW5 table from earlier releases in the incorrect format (entries with the field contents '12') for the TNIW5-REICHWEITE field.
Solution
Use Transaction SE16 to delete all entries in the TNIW5 table that have the two-digit contents '12' in the 'Range of coverage' field.
If you want to use the lowest value determination by range of coverage (Transaction MRN1) with valuation level = company code, you can maintain your own customer-specific Customizing entries in Transaction OMW5.
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 25.04.2005 10:09:21
Priority: Correction with medium priority
Category: Customizing
Primary Component: MM-IM-VP Balance Sheet Valuation Procedures
Affected Releases
Software
Component Release From
Release To
Release And
subsequent
SAP_APPL 46C 46C 46C
SAP_APPL 470 470 470
SAP_APPL 500 500 500
SAP_APPL 600 600 600
Correction delivered in Support Package
Support
Packages Release Package
Name
SAP_APPL 46C SAPKH46C52
SAP_APPL 470 SAPKH47026

Msg K1100 'The CO account assignment object belongs to company code X,not Y

Hi,
Unable to create an accounting document for a Return order.
Message K1100 - Error:The CO account assignment object belongs to company code X,not Y
Company Code : X
Sales Org: X
Plant: P
Billing Date : IG ( Internal Credit Memo)
The above details are from the item level- Account Assignment tab-Profitabliity Segment.
Pl. let us know from which table these fields are picked.
Regards
Biju
Edited by: Biju Mercy on Jan 7, 2010 12:58 PM

I believe the error message number is ki100 and not k1100 as indicated by you in which case, refer any of the following notes:-
a) 140503
b) 643700
c) 420778
d) 352261
e) 141224
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Cost center validity change and assign it to new company code

Hello
We are having 10 Cost centers in 1000 Company code, And validity of these cost centers is .01.01.2001 to 31.12.9999.
Now business want to create one more company code 2000. and wants to extend these same cost centers to 2000 company code also. But as per SAP std Cost center extention is not possible , bcz cost center can use by only one company code.
Now Company is saying that..they wants the same number for new company code from 23.09.2010 to 31.12.9999..
system is not allow me to change validity period of these cost centers, bcz these saying that the cost center is already defined for given period.
Beacuse new company code will start working from 24.09.2010. so i,e the reason , we want to make example "2561 cost center validity 01.01.2001 to 22.09.2010 for company code 1000. then after words 23.09.2010 to 31.12.9999 the same cost center 2561 will for 2000 company code.
but system is not allowing me to change the validity
Regards
Mahesh

Hi Mangesh
What you wish is not possible.. You will have to create new cost center and assign to the new company code...
may be for simplicity sake, you can add a prefix or suffix to the existing cost center no i.e Cost Ctr 2356 can become N2356 in new comp code
Regards
Ajay M

The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 2100, not 1100

Hi All,
My system has all different company codes assigned to one cotrolling area as a result one can change org unit and position cost center from one company code to another.
I recently changed same position's cost center from co code 2000 to cost center in new co code 1100 and created new personnel area to be linked to new Co code 1100. OM module doesn't moan however when I try and capture org-reassignment action to default same employee postion with new related cost center from new company code 1100 get the follwing error.
'The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 2100, not 1100'.
I see in IT0001 system defaults new personnel area linked to Co code 1100 however it still defaults old cost center linked to Co code 2000 instead of new cost center linked to Co code1100. How can I make the system default new cost center?
NB relationship for new cost center from Co code 1100 to postion has been changed effective 01.04.2012 . The same date is used for or-reassignment action.

Hi I had same problem can you explain me little bit more that how you will resolve this

Valuation Area at Company Code level

Hi,
In what ideal business case/industry one should set valuation area at company code level when SAP recommends valuation area must be set at Plant level ? in other words..what is the practical purpose of Valuation area at company Code level?

Hi
Think that valuation area link with records in table MBEW. So, if you have a company with 3 plants, and you have a single valuation for all company, in 3 plants the valuation of materials are the same, with their implications in valuation of stock and valuation of margin in sales (remember that this value can flow -really, use to flow- to condition VPRS in SD, well see SAP Note 1365939 - VPRS logic and Customizing settings in SD and SAP Note 547570 - FAQ: VPRS in pricing for more details). If you do a valuation different by plant, stock and margin calculations are different.
What are the elements that you must considerer?
1. If the materials is purchased, think if the same material have different conditions (different conditions in MM, for instance, indirect costs as shipment costs, different vendor with meaningful differences in prices or discounts). It's indiferent that it is a raw material or a material that you can sell. The raw material will work in product costing as an item in BOM. First of all, considerer the impact in stock value, second think how is delivered the materials to customer from plants and their impact in profitability analysis. If there are meaningful differences for the same material between different plants and you give the same value in all company, depending of the mix perhaps your customer is fooling himself about this issue.
2. If the material is manufactured, talk with your CO consultant and what kind of impact could have different routings, BOM and prices of raw materials between plants. Same considerations for valuation of stocks and margin.
Finally, in the page 10 of the document you can read
Valuation must be at Plant level in the following cases:
u2022If you want to use the application component Production Planning (PP) or Costing
u2022If your system is a SAP Retail system
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo
PD: I forgot, talk this with the CFO of the company, taking in account the restrictions (when it must be plant level).
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Nov 23, 2011 9:23 AM
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Nov 23, 2011 9:24 AM

Is it Possible to assign Valuation class without accounting view in MM

Hi all,
I have check my client system for materials having without accounting view while checking in table mbew for this material having valuation class.can anyelse say is it possible to assign valuation class without having accounting view.
Advance thanks,
raraja

Hello ,
It is not possible to have a valuation class without accounting view.
There is some mistake that you are possibly making . pls check the same .Pls check if u r viewing the material master at the correct plant level .Also if you say that in MBEW valuation class exists , find out l the corresponding valuation level, the see the material master at the same level . You will definitely find the accounting view.
Regards
Anis

Error message: CO account assigned to the wrong company code

Hello,
I've had the following error message in a report: "The CO account assignment object belongs to company code XXXX, not YYYY." What object is this? How can I change the assignment of the object to the company code? Which transactions should I use?
Please help me.
Thank you all,
Tatiana

Hi,
CO assignment could be through cost centre, I/O, WBS, cost object etc. Check your document and go to the master data of the relevant object. Keep in mind, that if there are postings on the object done already, you cannot change the assignment to company code, but have to create a new object (or use another one in the document, of course).
Regards,
Eli

"Account Assignment objects have differing company codes"

Hi,
We have parked the document through T.Code : MIR7 & now we want to post the same using the correct GL A/c.
When we try to post the document we are getting error like "Account Assignment Objects have differing Company Codes"
Can you please help me
Thanks
Ravi kumar

Please check in the document if it contains diferrent account assignments like both cost center and internal order. In this case both cost center and order must belong to same company code.
If you find the document fine, then solution is to change the error to warning using T Code OBA5 and application area KI (I assume). You should be seeing application area as part of your error message number which is usually first 2 characters.
Regards
Sreenivas

Error in PPMOD feature while assigning functional area under company code.

Hi Experts,
I am getting error in PPMOD feature while assigning functional area under company code.
The error is " The total fields lengths of the decision operations are too great ".
Please advice.
Regards,
IFF

Hi IFF,
The return values which you have maintained for the decision parameter are not acceptable that's why it's throwing that error.
Your PPMOD feature is based on company code and functional area.
Try to maintain it as follows:
000010                                  D     BUKRS
000020     1000           D     FKBER
000030     1000 0001                 &PPMOD=1,
000040     1000 ****                 &PPMOD=2,
000050     2000                 &PPMOD=1,
000060     2100                 &PPMOD=2,
000070     2900                 &PPMOD=2,
000080     2910                 &PPMOD=1,
000090     ****                 &PPMOD=2,
Please try to create this features value again using tree format, so that you can know the actual length of the return string and update the thread once done.
Edited by: pdk_hcm on Sep 6, 2011 2:30 PM

Valuation area is company code

Hi experts,
In our scenario, we have 2 plants and one storage location. only one balance sheet is preparing for both the plants( as is ).
My question is, if only one balance sheet preparing for both the plants, can I select the valuation area as "COMPANY CODE'" ?
If I change the valuation area as company code level, then, what are the changes I find when compared to plant level.
Also tell me how can I change the valuation area.
can anybody tell step by step.
Thanks in advance
kishore

In SAP, you need to choose either Plant Level or Company code level to valuate your material stocks. Once you've set, it is not possible to switch the valuation level from plant to company code or vice-versa unless data conversion (material master's accounting data) is carried out again.
We recommend to setting material valuation at Plant level because you can have separation set of account determination and stock type at each plant.
Also it is important that stocks must be valuated at Plant level,
when u implement the PP module the default valuation level will be PLANT
plz read the note at this SPRO > Enterprise structre> Definition>Logistics - General>Define valuation level (at left to valuation level)
u will get clear idea
hope it clears
regards
kunal

Error In Transfer The CO account assignment object belongs to company code

Dear All,
When i am trying to transfer a employee from a personnel area to another personnel area, i am getting the following error.
The CO account assignment object belongs to company code 2000, not 2007
These personnel areas belong to two different company codes.
Pls suggest.
Kind Regards
Nag

Hi,
Please check with the FICO consultant you have to give new CO assignemnt when you transfer EMPLOYEE to other companycode. i hope so
Vibin

The CO account assignment object belongs to company code PN10, not BN10

Hi All, Iu2019m getting the error u201CThe CO account assignment object belongs to company code PN10, not BN10" when trying to make a payment on an invoice that was created in company code BN10.
The error came about because, there was an exchange rate difference between the invoice value and the corresponding payment value (document currency is USD and the transaction I'm using to make payment is F-58).
Therefore when i try to make the payment, the SAP system detects the exchange rate difference and attempts to post it to the exchange rate difference account (421020050). In OKB9, the default cost center specified for G/L account (421020050) in BN10 is (B999010). Therefore when the payment is been done, the system posts the exchange rate difference to G/L account (421020050) and assigns the cost center (B999010).
However, upon trying to save the document, the system shows the message "Correct the marked line items" (the marked line item here is the exchange rate line item). Therefore, I double click the line item to drill down on it and see that everything seems fine. I then click the save button, on clicking it, the system shows the error "The CO account assignment object belongs to company code PN10, not BN10u201D.
When i double click the error to read a more comprehensive explanation of the error, its content are as displayed below:
The CO account assignment object belongs to company code PN10, not BN10
Message no. KI100
Diagnosis
You want to make a posting in company code BN10.
At the same time, a CO account assignment object was specified that is assigned to company code PN10.
This is account assignment object with object type CTR, and object key NIG1/A999010.
System Response
Company code validation is active for company code BN10:
All account assignment objects in one posting row must be assigned to the same company code.
Procedure
You can
u2022     Make an assignment to company code PN10.
u2022     Enter an account assignment object assigned to company code BN10.
u2022     Change the assignment of object NIG1/A999010 to company code PN10. In this case, you should note the document and edit it further after changing the assignment.
If the posting is to a balance sheet account (category 90), you may also decide whether to allow CO account assignment objects from other company codes. If this is the case, deactivate the error message with the IMG step Change message control (message ID "KI", message number 100).
You can set the following message types:
"-"   Message is not sent
"W"   Message is sent as a warning message
"E"   Message is sent as an error message
Posting to cost elements of another category always results in the message appearing as an error message, whether it has been deactivated or not.
Execute "Change message control"
(NOTE: All cost centers that starts with u201CAu201D belong to company code PN10 and those that starts with u201CBu201D belong to company code BN10)
Kindly help with the resolution of this issue. Any resolution ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Moderator: Please, search SDN

Check the following OSS notes
1) Note 141224 - Error message KI100 for cross company
2) Note 202765 - KI100 during release of intercompany billing
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

CO account assignment object belongs to company code SE01, not DK01

Hi SAP Gurus,
I am posting one inter company billing document. Customer is from Denmark and material is supplied from Sweden Co Code. Our requirement is to update the cost center field for the intercompany code document SE01. I have done following customizing in order to update Cost center field for inter company billing document for CoCd SE01.
1. Create order reason - OVAU
2. Maintain default cost center for order reason in tranx OVF3
I am encountering following error while trying to release billing doucment for account.
Diagnosis
    You want to make a posting in company code DK01.
    At the same time, a CO account assignment object was
    specified that is assigned to company code SE01.
    This is account assignment object with object type CTR,
    and object key CMAX/SE9001.
System Response
    Company code validation is active for company code DK01:
    All account assignment objects in one posting row must be
    assigned to the same company code.
Procedure
    You can
    o   Make an assignment to company code SE01.
    o   Enter an account assignment object assigned to company
        code DK01.
    o   Change the assignment of object CMAX/SE9001 to company
        code SE01. In this case, you should note the document
        and edit it further after changing the assignment.
    If the posting is to a balance sheet account (category 90),
    you may also decide whether to allow CO account assignment
    objects from other company codes. If this is the case,
    deactivate the error message with the IMG step Change
    message control (message ID "KI", message number 100).
    You can set the following message types:
        "-"   Message is not sent
        "W"   Message is sent as a warning message
        "E"   Message is sent as an error message
    Posting to cost elements of another category always results
    in the message appearing as an error message, whether it
    has been deactivated or not.
    Execute "Change message control"
Please let me know if you face such a issue in past.
Regards,
SATVIR SINGH
Moderator: I trust, SAP explanation is quite sufficient

Hi Satvir
You have switched on Comp Code validation in OKKP... which means you can not post to CO objects of another company code...
Eg: If billing is from comp code A, the co object has to be from same comp code.... Try to use OKB9 and specify a default CO object for the GL account involved in the posting or specify a default Cost center in OVF3 pertainig to the other comp code
Regards
Ajay M

Assign Valuation Class to Company Code

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for