Assigning objects to requests

On what basis we assign particular objects to particular request

Hi Nalasani,
I follow the procedure below.
For a perticular Project
I transport all the infoobjects first.
Then data targets (DSO, CUBE Etc..)
Then Transformation, DTP, Infopackages Etc
Hope this helps
PV

Similar Messages

  • How to assign one JSP request object to another JSP

    Hi,
    I want to assign one JSP request object (i.e., previous JSP Page request object) to another JSP (i.e., current JSP page request object).
    I don't want to use "<jsp:forward>" tag or "RequestDispatcher" obect here.
    Because i want to display one message in the current JSP page, before sending both JSP pages' request to a servlet. How to do this ?
    please help
    Thanks in advance
    Vishnu

    You cannot assign a request and response object of one jsp/servlet to another, every jsp or a servlet get is own fresh copy of request and response object with the request parameter data from the previous page.
    Unless u use request dispatcher or jsp:forward action, this solution that u r looking for by re-assigning the request and response object doesn't work

  • Is there any function module to assign Object to Transport request (Task)?

    Hi There,
    My requirement is to assign an object to desired task of the transport request. I found one FM called TR_EXT_INSERT_IN_REQUEST. But it has some limitations.
    Limitations of FM :  TR_EXT_INSERT_IN_REQUEST
    1. It will assign the given object to given Transport request. But not to the task of a transport request. This FM will not allow   assigning objects to the task. It will allow only to request.
    2. Object entry present in transport request table e071. But, I can't find any version in version management. Moreover, the object is not locked under that particular request.
    Can any one let me know, is there any function module to fullfill the requirement without above mentioned limitations?
    Requirement :
    1. Given object should be assigned to given task of TR.
    2. Need FM to activate the Object and object texts.
    3. After assigning to the request, It should show the vesion in version management and object should be locked under particular Task/ Request.
    Your help would be greatly appreciated and <<removed by moderator>> Thanks in advance.
    Have a nice day!!
    Thanks and Regards,
    Neelima. D
    Edited by: kishan P on Jan 5, 2012 2:21 PM

    @ Dear Nabheet & Karuna
    The object is not in local folder. I am aware of the process of assigning the object to request manually.
    I want that to be done automatically. I wont prefer writing BDC for this.
    @ Dear Keshav,
    Thank you for the function module. But TR_INSERT_REQUEST_WITH_TASKS will create a tarnsport request with tasks.
    @ Dear All,
    My requirement is to assign the object to Task automatically. Not creating the request or Task. Task & Request are
    present already.

  • In Request type, what is the difference between action 'Change user' and 'Assign object'

    Dear All,
    I have used only 'Assign Object' for my 'Change User' request type. But the standard request type has 'Change user'. So, could you suggest , what additional purpose does Change Object serve
    Regards
    Plaban

    HI Plaban
    not sure if you answered your own question here?
    Change User - by itself would allow update of address data, user parameters, defaults, etc
    Assign Object - as you mentioned roles and profiles.
    However, if assigning, I think you need to have both actions: change and assign
    I recall (ages ago) that change was only the user details and not the role or profiles. As a result, there were a few threads where people had to update the action for the request type of provisioning would not occur.
    This is something you could test
    Regards
    Colleen

  • Auto Assignement of Service Request to Engineers in CRMOD

    Hi all,
    We have a requirment where client wants us to do Auto Assignement of Service Request to engineers based upon the availibility and workload of engineer.
    For Example: If there are XX number of SR assigned to Engineer1 , then assign the new SR to Engineer2
    Also if the Engineer 2 has no bandwidth then assign it to Engineer 3
    Could you help me with some workaround for this in OD. Or if there any partner product who provides this functionality
    Thanks & Regards,
    Suchita

    I have done this using Web Services / Java applying it to Team Member assignments for Opportunity. It would be a 90% plus fit that would have to be modified to apply to SRs. The rules are configurable by users as the rules are stored in a custom object in CRM On Demand. It is pretty slick and has been in production for about a year. It is a high volume client in a multi-tenent environment.
    You can write any rules that you want and the most used rules are the ones that balance work load across users that have the same role (round robin assignments). There are other rules that assign by availability based on the calendar, shifts, skills, etc. the sky is the limit.
    To create a new rule type requires writing a new method in java and adding the rule to the custom object. It is very flexible and extendable. The customer that is using it is extremely pleased with it.
    Edited by: eSteege on Aug 8, 2012 10:58 PM

  • Open and Close Posting Periods According to G/L Account Assignment Objects

    Hi,
    Can anybody please explain me how configurations related to " Open and Close Posting Periods According to G/L Account Assignment Objects " works in SAP FICO? I am confused about this config.
    Regards,
    Mandeep

    Hi Mandeep ,
    First i would like to tell about fiscal year
    fiscal year is nothing but a financial year of company in sap . it contain 12 normal periods and 4 special periods.In genaral we will call like month but that is sap that is a period. so 12 period for 12 months ok next special period will use in all companies for audit and tax adjustment purpose of previous year.
    coming to the open and close periods.in sap for security purpose we have to open one period like this month july so i opened july period only we cant post the pervious month (june)and we cant post future month lik in (Auguest)ok
    You can close and open periods by transaction ob52.
    In transaction ob52 there are account types
    + Valid for all account types
    A Assets
    D Customers
    K Vendors
    M Materials
    S G/L accounts
    V Contract accounts
    + means all types. if you want to open vendor then enter period from and to according to your fiscal year.
    you cant adjust items in closed period. if you want to then you have to open the period
    For your information.....
    posting periods also open user level tc S_ALR_87003642.
    customization levael OB52.
    Regards
    Kumar

  • GR/IR clearing account is being assigned to a acct assignment object

    Hi there!
    My key-user asked me a question which I really don't know how to answer.  He asked me about the reason why in an accounting document automatically generated by MIRO the item which contains the GR/IR clearing acct is always assigned to an acct assignment object (such as WBS element or cost center).
    I noticed that all the acct documents generated by MIRO has this mentioned assignment but, unfortunately I don't know why it happens yet.
    That's I count on you to help me solving this issue I'm facing now. 
    Thanks in advance,
    Rubens Luiz
    SAP SCM Consultant
    +55 21 2141 0033

    Hello there!
    A friend of mine told that it's not a problem at all. And that the reason that the cost object was assigned (or appeared) when you displayed FI accounting document is that since GR/IR Clearing Account is treated as the balance sheet account (I would assume it is the same in your system) and given the Profit Center was appearing in both P&L and Balance Sheet Account Report, SAP will have to use the cost object to derive the ultimate profit center. 
    Thanks in anyway!
    Rubens Luiz
    SCM Consultant

  • Enter a true account assignment object with revenues

    Hi there,
    At my current client site we implemented COPA - Costing Based. I mapped a few revenue accounts  to COPA. Now when I try to make a posting in to COPA using FB70 . The system issues a error Message "Enter a true account assignment object with revenues" . I know  the Prof Segment is the account assignment object  its looking for and the system is not deriving it  from the information I entered in the FB70 document. Am I missing somethig here? Did anyone out there face similar issue??
    You inputs are highly appreciated!
    Regards,
    Siva Padallaparthy

    Hi Siva,
    Please check note 373823 for this error. Also please go through the long text of error message KI166. The solution of the error is mentioned in the long text itself.
    Regards,
    Abhisek

  • Enter a true account assignment object with revenues while reversing FB08

    Hi All
    When I am reversing the document through FB08 I am getting the warning messege "Enter a true account assignment object with revenues"
    Message no. KI166
    Diagnosis
    You made an account assignment for 31211100, a revenue element, in controlling area 1000 to a cost center or profit center.
    System Response
    Cost centers and profit centers can carry revenues in the SAP system as statistics only. To ensure reconciliation between FI and CO for revenue element 31211100, a CO account assignment object must record the revenues as a real value. This object type is used for updating to the reconciliation ledger.
    In principle, it is possible for the SAP system to automatically derive this CO account assignment object, the reconciliation object. However, all postings made in CO for costing-based Profitability Analysis are logged in the reconciliation ledger under "reconciliation object". In this manner, the reconciliation ledger identifies the exact values flowing into the operating profit. If you post reconciliation objects during revenue postings to cost centers or profit centers, you must do so while keeping the interpretation of the reconciliation ledger reports in mind. The sums of revenue postings to profitability segments, cost centers, and profit centers cannot be broken down further.
    Procedure
    To avoid posting to reconciliation objects, make account assignments to a real CO account assignment object.
    If you want to post to reconciliation objects, you can change this message to a warning or a note for future users, or deactivate the message entirely. Use the Implementation Guide under "Controlling: General" and choose Change message control. Enter area KI and message number 166. If you do not enter an individual user here, the change is valid for all users.
    It is not allowing me to reverse the document already posted.
    Please guide
    Thanks in Advance
    Sonal

    Hi,
    Do you have this cost element maintained in OKB9 with a reference to an internal order or profitability segment? If yes, please look at the note 373823.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • BDC selecting component - Assigning object dependencies

    Hi,
    I am facing a problem in developing a BDC program. In transaction CS02, for a configurable material there may be n number of components. The number of components may vary from material to material. My requirement is to assign object dependency Q & S to all the components for a given material.
    Through BDC program how can i pick the components one by one and assign object dependencies Q and S at runtime??? Dynamically on what basis do i have to pick the component? Any supporting code will be more helpfull. Very thankfull to you for solving the issue.
    Thanks,
    RAM

    I have a program which does exactly this.   What it does it excepts a flat comma-delimited file and uses this to chose the component and assign the obj dep.  Now that I'm looking at it, it looks that it will allow up to three obj dep to be added for a single component.  The file layout will need to have......
    material number
    plant
    item number
    component material lnumber
    object dep 1
    object dep 2
    object dep 3
    I can send you the code if you email me at the address on my business card.
    Regards
    Rich Heilman

  • Assigned Object text not displayed in Multi-Level Notification Lists (QM19)

    Hello Everyone !
    Today, i would like to share an issue I am facing in regards to Assigned objects in QM notifications.
    We are using Assigned objects functionality available in Enterprise Extension PLM, Enhancement Package 4 (EA-PLM 604), to link inspection lots to notification items. Assigned object type Inspection lot is provided in standard by SAP.
    All necessary configuration has been done and inspection lots are correctly linked. When we run Multi-level notification list (QM19) to display the details of notifications in a tree view with assigned objects, all information is coming except object text. In this case inspection lot text. The field is available in the structure but comes blank despite being filled in the lot.
    I would like to know if anyone has encountered such issue and how did you solve it.
    System info:
    EHP7 for SAP ERP 6.0
    Thank you.
    Ayoub.

    Hello Everyone !,
    After checking, looks like this is a missing code in standard SAP implementation for Assigned objects.
    This will be solved by small ABAP code.
    Thank you
    Ayoub.

  • How to set  an object in request scope in  a jsp uysing  jstl

    I usally use scriptlet in jsp to set an object in request is
    there a way to do this using jstl
    instead of this
    <%request.setAttribute("test",myObject);%> I want to use tag ?

    The <c:set> tag should be useful...
    Of course if you can access it as a JSTL variable it IS already an attribute in scope.

  • Msg K1100 'The CO account assignment object belongs to company code X,not Y

    Hi,
    Unable to create an accounting document for a Return order.
    Message K1100 - Error:The CO account assignment object belongs to company code X,not Y
    Company Code : X
    Sales Org: X
    Plant: P
    Billing Date : IG ( Internal Credit Memo)
    The above details are from the item level- Account Assignment tab-Profitabliity Segment.
    Pl. let us know from which table these fields are picked.
    Regards
    Biju
    Edited by: Biju Mercy on Jan 7, 2010 12:58 PM

    I believe the error message number is ki100 and not  k1100  as indicated by you in which case, refer any of the following notes:-
    a)  140503
    b)  643700
    c)  420778
    d)  352261
    e)  141224
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Account assignment objects are incorrect. No substitution is possible

    Account assignment objects are incorrect. No substitution is possible.
    Message no. 3G209
    Diagnosis
    The account assignment object check showed that, from the point of view of CO, the specified account assignment is not valid, and cannot be replaced by the employee's master cost center or a substitute cost center. This item cannot be posted.

    delete the previous results and run the live pay roll run and accounting run

  • Acc.assignment object replaced by current master cost center for employee

    Hi,
    I am facing a peculiar warning message while running the payroll posting run for only 2 employees.  The warning message s as follows:
    "Acc.assignment object replaced by current master cost center for employee
    Message no. 3G399"
    Prior to this, there were an error saying the
    "Account assignment objects are incorrect. No substitution is possible.
    Message no. 3G209"
    Later we found that the Position was not assigned to that employee properly.  I later assigned the correct position.. but still during the posting run the warning message appears.
    Please let me know if this is okay or is this an error which restricts the postings.
    Regards,
    Balaji TR

    Your postings will go through with the first warning message. However, please be warned that any account assignment related entries (IT 0027, 2001, 2002) will be wholly ignored.
    Check if any entries have been made to different cost centers for the erroring employees. If so, check for the reason why those entries have been made (since it is evident that the configuration does not support such entries). You may need to tie in with a CO consultant to ensure that there are no loose ends.

Maybe you are looking for