Assignment number in SO Header maps to which segment of ORDERS05?

Hi All,
Can anyone let me know the ORDERS05 IDoc segment that corresponds to the Assignment number field in sales order header Accounting tab?
I need to specify the assignment number while creating a new order through IDoc.
Thanks.
Regards,
Riyaz

Hi,
Use transaction we60 to find the relevant documentation for your idoc type.
regards,
Jakub

Similar Messages

Assignment Number updation

Hi,
Scenario 1: Contract --> Invoice --> Credit memo Request --> Credit Memo.
In the above process cycle, we have the contract number appearing in the assignment number field of the credit memo - As desired.
Scenario 2: Sales Order --> Returns Order --> Credit Memo.
In the above process cycle, we have the Returns order number appearing in the assignment number field of the credit memo - which is not expected. Whereas, we want the sales order number to appear in the assignment number field of the credit memo.
The copy control settings for both Credit memo Request --> Credit Memo &
Returns Order --> Credit Memo
are: allocation number field has the option - "B" - Sales Order.
For the billing document type --- the allocation number field has the option as "Blank"
Regards

Hi,
For credit memo, you can get return order numer if you maintain "B" in copy control
If you need Previous sales order number then maintain sales order number in PO field of return order and you will get in credit memo if you set "A" in copy control
Thanks
Chidambaram

MR11_OLD and assignment number

Hello,
One of our program uses BDC for MR11_OLD , we found that it is trying to populate the assignment number field for all the items which are non GR/IR line items and this is not happeneing for all but few, I want to know how I can correct this problem? Any SAP notes or inputs on this would be appriciated.
Thanks

Information saved in phone's cache will only get deleted when space it takes is overwritten with something else.
If you restore your phone and set up as new and sync only contacts from the cloud you will clean out old info, but at expense of losing a lot of stuff. Short of full restore ( or just plane erase) of the phone there is nothing that will clean the cache.

Mapping to dublicate segments

Hi all,
My scenario File to IDoc. I am doing the mapping from Flat file to Idoc. whenever I imported Idoc in Message mappin i am finding the dublicated segments with the same name. Whether I have to map for all the segments ? If yes which one I have to map to which segment.
thanks in advance.
Regards,
Anjaneya

Anjaneya,
it all depends upon business rules or mapping rules, so first of make sure if you have to map only one segment or not.
If you have to map only one segment, then just map with any one, since they are duplicate and disable the other one by right click on segment and chose disable.
Note: Make your requirement very clear, mapping is not a problem (map to any segment).
Regards,
Sarvesh
****Reward points, if found helpful.

Assignment number Field in sales order header

Hi All,
Can anyone let me know the ORDERS05 IDoc segment that corresponds to the Assignment number field in sales order header Accounting tab?
I need to specify the assignment number while creating a new order through IDoc.
Thanks.
Regards,
Riyaz

Hi,
Use transaction we60 to find the relevant documentation for your idoc type.
regards,
Jakub

Problem in assigning number range to support desk messages

Gurus ,
we are in the process of configuring service desk in solution manager
7.0 .
so far the following steps were done ,
- implemented note 898614
-Activate Solution Manager Services via SICF
-activated BC sets for service desk
-Fetched SAP components vis DSWP
-Assigned number range for ABA notification via DNO_CUST01
but while assigning the support desk for service messages via ,
SPRO--> SAP Solution Manager --> Basic Settings --> SAP Solution
Manager System --> Service Desk --> Number Ranges for Notifications.
Then press the execute icon ( ) next to Assign number range for Service
Desk Messages.,
when assigning internal number as '01' and external number as '02' and clicking on save button we
get the error as "Enter valid number range interval '

Hi Susin,
you may have a look at this to get more information about number ranges
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/2a/fa02fd493111d182b70000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
A number range is a range of numbers which are assigned to objects uniquely.
Such numbers are some kind of identifiers (which may be used to describe obejcts). In your case the ABA / Basis notifications are identified by those unique numbers.
Hope this clarifies things a bit.
/cheers

Need help in header mapping!!

Hi, because we have an third party system i think i have to use header mapping in receiver agreement!
For outgoing IDocs everything works fine, incoming aren't be transfered to target system.
I have:
ThirdParty: EDI
BusinessService: EDI_Test
Business System: Q01CLNT010
Incoming receiver agreement looks like this:
Sender
Party: EDI
Service: EDI_Test
Receiver
Service: Q01CLNT010
Interface: DELINS.DELFOR02
Namespace: urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
Header Mapping (like i thought)
Sender-Party: EDI
Sender-Servcie: EDI_Test
Reciever Party:
Reciever Service: Q01CLNT010
The incoming IDoc has follwoing parameters in header Segment:
- <EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="1">
<TABNAM>EDI_DC40</TABNAM>
<MANDT>100</MANDT>
<DIRECT>1</DIRECT>
<IDOCTYP>DELFOR02</IDOCTYP>
<MESTYP>DELINS</MESTYP>
<STD>V</STD>
<STDVRS>096001</STDVRS>
<STDMES>DELINS</STDMES>
<SNDPOR>EDI</SNDPOR> [like port in we21]
<SNDPRT>LS</SNDPRT>
<SNDPRN>EDI</SNDPRN>
<RCVPRT>LS</RCVPRT>
<RCVPFC>LF</RCVPFC>
<RCVPRN>30396</RCVPRN>
<CREDAT>20071204</CREDAT>
<CRETIM>130428</CRETIM>
<REFMES>DELFOR02</REFMES>
</EDI_DC40>
can somebody give me a hand on this?!
br

Hi guys,
because of help approach i wrote what i have done yet. But first i explain what is working.
We have an EDIServer in our Landscape which sends EDI-Calls. This Calls are triggered from R/3 via XI to EDIServer. This outgoing communication runs. (plz don't ask why we still use EDIServer because of EDI-Adapter for XI)
I configured this scenario with party!
But now i want to get calls from EDIServer. So i have to work with send IDocs from EDIServer which this previously tronsforemed from EDI-Format in IDoc-Format.
So i simply thought i configure scenario the other way round by using the party again. But this does not work out. However, i explain my IB Rep Objects:
Receiver Determination:
Sender
Party: EDI
Service: EDI_Test
Interface: DELINS.DELFOR02
Receiver
Party: *
Service: *
Interface Determination:
Sender
Party: EDI
Service: EDI_Test
Interface: DELINS.DELFOR02
Namespace: urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
Receiver
Party: *
Service: *
Sender Agreement:
Sender
Party: EDI
Service: EDI_Test
Interface: DELINS.DELFOR02
Namespace: urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
Receiver
Party:
Service:
Receiver Agreement
Sender
Party: EDI
Service: EDI_Test
Receiver
Party:
Service: Q01
Interface:DELINS.DELFOR02
Namespace:urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
--> do i need header mapping here?!
What do i need to do to make this scenario run?!
br - i highly appreciate ur previous help!!!!

Content Objects or XPATH in Header mapping..!! How to provide??

Hi All,
Iam doing B2B scenarios where i need to pass the Party name by based on the content of the message in the header mapping.
I think we can do by using Content Objects or XPATH in Header mapping, but the structure is not displaying in the Content Objects or XPATH in Header map in order to provide the condition.
I need to do anything else to see the structure over there?
Waiting for your replys.
Thanks&Regards
Seema.

Hi,
If you get the following msg while selecting the BS in Receiver Determination
"Message interface does not exist in any software components installed on this business system"
1) Open ID-----Double click on Business system that which u are using in the scenario
2) Check whether you are able to see the SWC in the Othere attributes TAB
3) If it is not there means goto SLD----Open the Technical System of R/3 by choosing Web as ABAp type
4) Click on Installed Products TAB
5) Click on Add New product and add your Product of the SWC whcih you are using for developement and Save it
6) Then goto Business systems TAB in the same Technical systems window and click on the Business System appears in the window.
7) Click on Installed products and Check the check box of your Product and then finally save that.
Now you should be able to see the SWC in the Othere attributes TAB in ID
Regards
Seshagiri

CcBPM Process Number in the Message mapping

Hi,
I have a requirement to map the ccBPM's process number in which the Mapping error has occured to be mapped to a specific field in the target. I wanted to know how could I pass the BPM's process number to the message mapping ( this message mapping(Service mapping) is a part of the same BPM). If we could get the MESSAGE_ID of the message in the message mapping, we should also be getting the BPM Process number.
In other words, when an alert is triggered in BPM, we get the BPM process number in its subject, i need that BPM process number in to the message mapping where that message has to be stored in a table in ECC.
I have searched in help and SDN to check if some system properties can help, but i couldnt. Any help/inputs from you is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Kalpana.

Hi Manuel,
it is very easy to to get the Message ID, which is unique and useful for selecting a message in the monitoring
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/b3/9a2aeb24dc4ab6b1855c99157529e4/content.htm">Special Access to Mapping Runtime Constants</a>
You send a mail from Java Mapping or, what would be the standard, (as additional) message from BPM or just as normal Message Receiver or only in Error case as Alert receiver.
Regards,
Udo

Difference in idoc adapter header mapping between SP14 and SP19

Hi All,
i have a very strange problem.......i have 2 XI systems : XI-sandbox and XI-dev.....
XI-sandbox is on XI3.0 SP19 whereas XI-dev is on XI3.0 SP14...........
I have a file->XI->idoc scenario which is same on both XI-sandbox and XI-dev....
in receiver idoc adapter, i am using header mapping for sender service and in the sender service i am using XPATH of a field of control rec of idoc.........
this scenario works fine on XI-sandbox which is on SP19 and the idocs are sent to SAP R/3 sandbox...........but this scenario on XI-dev gives error in SXMB_MONI in XI-dev of Call adapter - "No party conversion found".........
So my question is that is there any difference in idoc adapter header mapping between SP14 and SP19.........
Thanks,
Rajeev Gupta
Message was edited by:
RAJEEV GUPTA

>so i cant use apply control rec values from payload.........
rajeev,
I know this has nothing to do with the original problem but please do bear.
If I undertood you posts correct, the Sender Partner Name is set in the Idoc Control record in the field SNDPRN in the mapping using some mapping logic.
Now, this is the partner name with which the idoc is to be posted to thge R3 system.
if yes, then like I have pointed above, using "Take Sender From Payload" in the Receivcer Idoc Adapter is a better option as pointed in the SAP help as well.
As you are already populating the idoc control ecord with SNDPRN just make the SNDPRT as LS and then select "Take Sender from Payload" in the receiver Idoc adapter and the Sender Partner Name will not be taken from SDNPRN just as you want.
This is different from "Apply Control Records From Payload" .
Regards
Bhavesh
PS : you can ignore this reply if the situatios is too late to make this change and thanks for the patience.

IDOC Acknowledgement and Header Mapping

Dear all,
I've got the following scenario:
SAP 4.6C is sending many different IDOCs to XI 3.0 (SP14).
On XI side there are several integration processes, business systems and business services receiving the IDOCs.
I want to create IDOC acknowledgements and send them back to SAP system.
For one integration process I was able to successfully create and send back an acknowledgement by following the steps described in the very good blog:
/people/saravanakumar.kuppusamy2/blog/2005/01/20/configuration-tips-for-a-business-serviceintegration-process-to-send-back-ale-audit-idoc
Now I want that every integration process/business system/business service is sending back an acknowledgement with the same logical system name (meaning "this acknowledgement is coming from XI").
As it is not possible to enter the same logical system name for more than one process I created a receiver agreement with:
Sender Service = the integration process
Receiver Service = the SAP 4.6C business system
Receiver Interface = ALEAUD.ALEAUD01
Receiver Communication Channel = IDOC receiver channel called "Ack_IDOC_Receiver", existing in SAP 4.6C business system and pointing to this system
Additionally I created a header mapping in this receiver agreement where I set the Sender Service to the business system of the XI system.
Unfortunately the tests showed to me that obviously the header mapping (maybe even the whole receiver agreement) is being ignored completely as no Acknowledgement IDOC will be created. Instead I get the error message "Unable to convert sender service to an ALE logical system".
I also played around a bit with the options "Apply Control Record Values from Payload" and "Pass Sender value from Payload" but this didn't make any difference.
Why is the header mapping not replacing the sender service in the acknowledgement message?
Best regards,
Tobias

Tobias,
we have the same Problem.
we´re sending with Receiving Partner "12345" and the IDoc in the target System is filled with the standard SAP Value maybe the one configured in the SDL.
We have configured our IDOC_REceiver with a mark on "Apply Control Record Value from payload".
If you have a look at the SAP Helpfile you will find out that some header fields are not be changeable and get the value from sap.
like IDOC-Number, Receiving Partner and maybe the sender service ???
Regards,
Gordon

Header Mapping in Receiver agreement.?

Hi All,
When we do B2B scenarios using AS2 adapters.
1. Is it mandatory to use Header Mapping in Receiver agreement.?
2. If yes, is it enough if we provide Party Names? or we need to provide Business system or Business service names as well?
3. What is the purpose of this Header Mapping?
Kindly share your answers.
Regards
Deepthi.
Edited by: deepthi reddy on Jan 31, 2008 6:49 AM

Hi Deepthi,
1) Is it mandatory to use Header Mapping in Receiver agreement?
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/forums
2)What is the purpose of this Header Mapping?
The header mapping is important when configuring cross- company processes in which the business partners want to replace the names of their internal business systems with neutral representatives (party, business service).
Example
if you are doing a file to IDoc scenario, now while mapping the data to IDoc in mapping if you map the IDoc segment called EDI_DC40 with all required data then you have to user the Header mapping in the agreement so that whatever data you have mapped will be picked from payload. And if you do not use this header mapping then then XI will take care of it.
You can do the following in the header mapping:
● Specify fixed values
● Define that the conversion of the field values is to be determined dynamically from the message payload
To specify the header mapping for an address field, select the check box for the field name (for example, sender service) and choose Display List of Permitted Values (This graphic is explained in the accompanying text).
There are different editors for specifying the party and service:
● Use the party editor to specify a party
● Use the service editor to specify a service
Caution
Header mappings are only supported by the following receiver adapters at runtime:
IDoc Adapter
Plain HTTP adapter
RNIF Adapter 2.0
RNIF Adapter 1.1
CIDX Adapter
3)If yes, is it enough if we provide Party Names? or we need to provide Business system or Business service names as well?
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/5d/112d20f6ce6c46ba66afb98d278fbd/frameset.htm
Regards
Azeez khan.

HEADER MAPPING in RECEIVER AGREEMENT use.?

Hi folks,
Can anyone explain me about the HEADER MAPPING in RECEIVER AGREEMENT. In which cases we go for this header mapping.
Give me an example if possible or any links regarding this.
Thanks in advance
Srinivas Reddy.

Dear Srinivas,
Go through the following link and you may get some idea on this.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/b2/1f17419b24f06fe10000000a1550b0/content.htm
Regards,
JP.

Assignment number in MIRO

Dear all,
When I proceed Non-PO invoice (FB60), there is one column in line-item: Assignment Number. I use this column to post serial number so that I could use when I do tax report.
My Tax report can only get data from invoice's line items but header.
My concern now is in MIRO, I couldn't find Assignment No. column though I tried to apply all layout that exists.
Please tell me where can I put my serial number, or where the Assignment No. column now is in MIRO?
Please be noticed that in MIRO we don't have much modifiable column left.
I would appreciate your help a lot.
With best regards,
Linh

Hi,
You will find the assignment field in MIRO in header > Details tab
Regards,
SDNer

Manual excise map with which purchase order

Dear experts,
Can you tell me which manual excise map with which purchase order ? give me table name and report if you know !
Thanks

Dear Mr. Siva,
Sorry for the late reply, actually I was out of touch from this issue for few days. I am sending you the detail about my configuration----
I have assigned this condition type as following ...
TAXINN     ZA1X     A/R AT1 Quantity based
TAXINN     ZECS     A/R Cess Quantity Based
TAXINN     ZEXP     A/R BED Quantity based
Condition type information
     Control data 1
Cond. class       D Taxes
Calculat.type     Q Commodity
Cond.category D Tax
Rounding rule         Commercia
StrucCond.
     Change which can be made---
Manual entries      C       Manual entry has priority
Still it is not showing the duty at the time of (J1IIN)
It may be I am missing some configuration or wrong configuration.
give me some hints...
thank you
Vijay

Assignment number in SO Header maps to which segment of ORDERS05?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for