Assignment of souces automaticaly in PR

Is it possible to assign the sources of supply in PR automaticaly without creation of source list with only info records in place.
Thx

Not possible except you use the Transaciton ME57.
This will allow you to assign the source and process for PO or use ME56 to assign the source without source list.

Similar Messages

While PR Conversion In To PO System Pop Message Enter Account Assignment

Hello
PR is created from work order having account assignment category as "F" and Work order has Outline agreement which having the account assignment category as "U" .when i am trying to convert the PR TO PO system throw pop up messsage for input account assignment as PR having assignment category as "F" and account assignment as Order number eventhogh while PR TO PO conversion its is asking me account assignment .it should automaticaly coppied from PR.but it is not happening.Please suggest any clue for this strange system behaviour.
regards,
Rakesh

Hi,
Is there any coincidence among those PRs or materials or Order types?
Please check the following tables.
T163K account assignment category customizing
T162K field selection
T163A combination of item category and account assignment category.
SPRO >> Materials Management...>Purchasing...>Account Assignment..>Define Combination of Item Categories/Account Assignment Categories.
Assign the required Item category to AAC category & try.
Combination item category L/account assignment category E not defined
Regards,
Maheswaran.

ESYU: Blanket PO approve시 ASL과 Sourcing Rules이 생성되기 위해 요구되는 steps

Purpose
Oracle Purchasing - Version: 11.5.8 to 11.5.10
Blanket Purchase Order approval 동안 ASL과 Sourcing Rules이 생성되게 하기 위해
요구되는 steps에는 무엇이 있는지 알아본다.
Solution
Profile Options:
- PO: Allow Auto-generate Sourcing Rules => CREATE AND UPDATE
- PO: Allow Autocreation of Oracle Sourcing Documents => Yes
- MRP: Default Assignment Set => Define with desired Assignment Set (eg. Supplier Scheduling)
Note:
- 위 Profiles은 User, Responsibility, Application 그리고 Site level로 setting 할 수 있다.
- Profile option을 setting 하거나 변경 후, application을 re-log 해야 한다.
Workflow Builder를 통해 PO Approval Workflow를 setup:
Attributes
- Create Sourcing Rule Flag: "Y"
- Update Sourcing Rule Flag: "Y"
- PO SR Rule Name Prefix: "PURCH" - Default Value
- PO Assignment Type ID for SR: "3 - Item level "
- PO Sourcing Organization ID: ASL이 생성되어야 하는 Inventory Org를 set
Example 1 : 새로운 Socing Rule이 생성
a. 아래 setting을 가진 Blanket을 생성:
- "Enable Automatic Sourcing"
- "Update Existing Sourcing Rule and Assignment"
- Item: AS12345
- Supplier: Advanced Network Devices
- Site: SANTA CLARA
b. Deferred Parameter "Yes", Workflow Background engine을 실행
c. Supply Base> Approved Supplier List로 이동
d. Item AS12345를 조회
e. 생성된 ASL을 확인
f. Soucing Rule 화면으로 이동
- Sourcing Rule을 조회: PUR%
- Soucing Rule 'PURCH_ABCD' 이 생성된 것을 확인
- Supplier: Advanced Network Devices
- Allocation = 100% , Rank =1
g. Soucing Rule 생성을 확인
h. Assignment Set 화면으로 이동
i. 조회:
- Assignment Set: Supplier Shceduling
- Type: Item
- Item: AS12345
- Soucing Rule: PURCH_ABCD
j. Assignment Set 생성을 확인
Example 2 : 기존의 Soucing Rule / ASL을 update
a. 아래 setting을 가진 Blanket을 생성:
- "Enable Automatic Sourcing"
- "Update Existing Sourcing Rule and Assignment"
- Item: AS12345
- Supplier: Advanced Network Devices
- Site: SANTA CLARA
b. Deferred Parameter "Yes", Workflow Background engine을 실행
c. Supply Base> Approved Supplier List로 이동
- Item 'AS1345'를 조회
- Supplier Block으로 이동:
- Supplier: Advantage Corp
- Site: ADVANTAGE - US
d. ASL이 존재하고 있음을 확인
e. Soucing Rule 화면으로 이동
- Soucing Rule을 조회: PUR%
- Soucing Rule 'PURCH_ABCD' 이 생성된 것을 확인
- Supplier: Advanced Network Devices
- Site: SANTA CLARA
- Allocation = 100% , Rank =1
f. 기존의 Soucing rule PURCH_ABCD가 update 된 것을 확인
g. Assignment Set 화면으로 이동, 조회
- Assignment Set: Supplier Shceduling
- Type: Item
- Item: AS12345
- Soucing Rule: PURCH_ABCD
j. Assignment Set은 변경됨이 없음을 확인, 왜냐하면 soucing rule이 동일하기 때문
Reference
Note 273983.1

Source of Supply

Hi everybody,
We are on SRM 5.0 (classic mode). When we create a described requirement the system gets all the sources of supply from the backend system. If there are many sources of supply the system does not assign any one source of supply automatically. However if there is only one source of supply the system automatically assigns the source of supply. Is there a way to not have the system assign the souce of supply to the shopping basket (when there is only one source of supply available)? This should happen only for described requirements shopping basket.
Any ideas or suggestions will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Venkat

Venkat,
<b>Currently we are using punchout. Unless we create a info record it does not create a PO in the backend system. Is there some thing we have to do for punchouts?</b>
You dont need to get PIR and contracts for the creation of PO's from punchout catalogs. The configuration step SPRO>SRM SERVER> MASTER DATA> DEFINE EXTERNAL WEB SERVICES will let you assign the BP number for the catalog. This will be transferred to SRM shopping cart as a partner function 19 from the OCI.
Select a business type product catalog for the new Web Service and confirm your selection with Enter. Once you do that the next page will ask you for additional info liek teh BP number for source of supply. This step will automatically ensure the transfer of the source of supply to SRM as a fixed vendor and enable the PO creation.
If this is satisfied with this step, then you can suppress the source of supply with my workaround solution only for describe requirement. '
Also i have a business question for you. If you want to suppress the source of supply of a product category only in the describe requirement, it really doesnt make sense as in the internal goods you use the source of supply for the same product category.
If your business driver is creation of the follow on document on the basis of the shopping cart (describe requirement or internal goods/services), then i guess for the same product category you need to find a distinguishing criteria between the two and use a BADI to force changing the partner function from 19 to 39 (preferred vendor). This will create a PR for describe requirement.
Hope info helps !!
Please assign points if answer is usefull !!
Sundeep

SCSM 2012R2 - How to assign automaticaly a knowledge article to ticket ?

Hello,
How can i assign automaticaly a SCSM knowledge article or a Sharepoint URL to a new ticket depending on his name ?
For information :
I create tickets directly from SCOM alert after putting into customfield10 his knowledge article URL (Sharepoint site).
I just would like to keep that URL and associate it to the ticket.
You see ?
thank's !
Jérémy

In the SCOM alert connector you could create a routing criteria based on the alert name and apply a template that includes the link to the knowledge article. That is a bit the other way around compared to what you are doing currently.
For a more dynamic approach use Orchestrator to add the knowledge article link to ex. the incident description based on the SCOM alert name. I think you can use the "map published data" activity for this (mapping alert names to article links),
but haven't used that for a while.
Cheers,
Anders Spælling
Senior Consultant
Blog:
Twitter: LinkedIn:
Please remember to 'Propose as answer' if you find a reply helpful

Customer Down Payment invoice (from delivery) not automatically assigned

If I create a Down payment invoice from Sales Order (and I paied it) on the final invoice the sistem automatically assigne the down payment invoice on the final invoice for the order.
If I do the same think but crerating the Down payment invoice from the delivery (and I paid it) when I create the final invoice I need to assigned it manually.
SBO 8.81 PL 06
I haven't found any set up for this, so I think is an error the sistem must work on the same way if the document is copied from the Sales order or delivey.
Someone know if there is some set up? or I need to open an error message to SAP?
Thanks

My question is:
If I make a sales order.
I create a down payment invoice using copy from SO.
I make the incomuing payment for the down payment invoice.
I create the delivery from the SO
I create the invoice from the delivery
The system apply automaticaly the down payment invoice to the invoice (because I select a delivery that is linked to the so that I used to create the down payment invoice).
If I make a sales order.
I create the delivery from the SO
I create a down payment invoice using copy from delivey.
I make the incomuing payment for the down payment invoice.
I create the invoice from the delivery
The system DO NOT apply automaticaly the down payment invoice to the invoice (even if also this document is linked to the delivery that I use to create the down payment invoice).
I know that I can select it manually. But I can select it manually also if I use the SO to create the down payment instead of the
delivery. Why if the situation is the same in the firs case the system do it automatil^cally and in the second case I need to do it manually?
Of course if I create a Down Payment invoice without selecting any document (SO, delivery..) the system don't know if you want to apply the payment to the final invoice.
But If I select the delivey to create the down payment (the same if I select the SO): I want to apply the down payment to the final invoice of this delivery and not to another delivery.

A/c determination process - automaticaly flows to the exact plant wise

HI,
I'm posting again, on my blw query,
Pls explain the process abt a/c determination for service po's (with item catelory & a/c assign) during miro.
For example. I have three plants and same tax codes used for all plants and gl numbers are diff as per below. ,
For plant #1 - ESA - 101, ESE - 102, VSE -103
For Plant #2 - ESA- 201, ESE-202, VSE-203
For Plant #3 - ESA- 301, ESE-302, VSE-303
And assume gl is assigned in OB40 (w/o tax code combination) as,
ESA-101 , ESE - 202 , VSE -303 .
While doing miro for what ever plant, it's going and set on appropriate plant g/l nbrs based on trns. key.
Pls tell me how a/c determination process flows automaticaly to the exact plant wise.

Hi ,
For the automatic account posting to different G/L account for different plant---- Group the plants with different grouping by assigning different valuation grouping code. All the automatic account posting config is to be done for each of the valuation grouping code.
Thus the automatic account postings to different G/L accounts happen for different valuation grouping code.
Thanks & Regards,
Amjad

A/c determination process flows automaticaly to the exact plant wise

Dear All,
Pls explain the process abt a/c determination for service po's (with item catelory & a/c assign) during miro.
For example. I have three plants and same tax codes used for all plants. I have defined in FS00 different G/L number for every plant as per below,
For plant #1 - ESA - 101, ESE - 102, VSE -103
For Plant #2 - ESA- 201, ESE-202, VSE-203
For Plant #3 - ESA- 301, ESE-302, VSE-303
And assume gl is assigned in OB40 (w/o tax code combination) as,
ESA-101 , ESE - 202 , VSE -303 .
While doing miro for what ever plant, it's going and set on appropriate plant g/l nbrs based on trns. key. pls tell me how a/c determination process flows automaticaly to the exact plant wise.

no answer

Account assigned PO doesn't transfer to R/3

We are using extended Classic scenario with PDP.
We are able to complete the cycle w/o account assigned PO like, PR transfer to EBP, Creation PO in sourcing cockpit in EBP & same PO gets transferred to R/3.
But whenever PR is account assigned with P or Q & we create PO in EBP from soucing cockpit, PO is not getting transferred to R/3.
In EBP - BBP_PD shows no error
HEADER     I1009          Held
HEADER     I1015          Awaiting Approval
HEADER     I1021          Created
HEADER     I1038          Complete
HEADER     I1043          Ordered
HEADER     I1080          In Transfer to Execution Syst.
HEADER     I1081          In Transfer to Planning Syst.
HEADER     I1120          Change was Transmitted
HEADER     I1132          Transfer Failed (E.Sys.)
HEADER     I1180          Document Completed
0000000001 I1021          Created
But PO doesn't exists in R/3. What could be problem?
Regards,
NNK

Hi Dinesh
Thanks for reply
1. In SLG1 we have already checked, Nothing is appearing there
2. In Define Account Assignment Categories, Against WBS, we have indicated Q.
I think it is ok.
Anything else needs to be done?
Regards,
NNK

Yellow stickie "To Get started with Places" is frozen on the screen. How do move on and assign a place?

IPhoto 11 (9.1.5 version) Program works fine has been doing so for a year. Never used "Places" feature before. Now when I try it the screen freezes in the "get info" mode. I see a yellow sticky type deal with "To Get Started wtih Place" and some choices. Behind the sticky is a geyed out map. I can't do anything. It seems at this point I should be able to put a pin on the map or something. In preferences I have checked "look up places automaticaly" Any ideas?

I tried what you suggest. It is at the point where I have pushed the "info" button. The side panel comes up then there is an item "assign place" I push that and then I get the frozen screen and the yellow sticky. I think it goes way back to when I moved to this compuer. As I remember iphoto had some trouble with the photo library. I don't remember how, but finally the photos showed up in the program and all worked well ...I thought.
Anyway, thanks for your efforts.
Phil

How can we assign Extract Structure of datasource to request to transport

Hi,
I was trying to transport datasource. But it ended with errors due to unavailability of extract structure. So plz guide me how I can assign Extract structure of datasource to request to transpport.
I tried to assign in RSA6 but here there is no option to extract structure to assing to request.

Hi,
Normally when you get the screen to select and hide the fileds and then save it, you will get the extract structure collected automaticaly in your TP request.
Hope it helps
Regards,
Srini

ERS indicator of PO item is not checked for Contract assigned SRM POs.

Hi Team
We have SRM PO which is assigned to contract as source of supply and vendor for the contract document is assigned with ERS functionality (Aut. setlement in vendor master) for Invoice settlement.
Issue faced: When the contract is selected as sources of supply for Shopping cart and ordered as release order in MM (classic deployment) MM PO line ERS flag is not defaulted. Scenario works for normal procurement with vendor assigned Purchase orders.
Did any one faced similar issue in their landscape.
Regards
Prashanth K Saralaya

I think this is one of the vendor data synchronisation issue like OA vendor .
Vendor master team might change some data but in contract it will not be synched automaticaly. we may require action on CONTRACT equivalent to vendor master maintenance.
if the contract has ERS .It might be available in PO too when you refer contract.
debate come here like who takes precedence vendor master or contract ?
However customer may expect this ERS falg has to set in the contract as well as it may replicate the same in po as well.
for testing manually EDIT via ECC contract and flag ERS.
muthu

MM - output type not *allways* assigned during posting with MB1C?

Hi guys,
in one of our R/3 4.6C systems we have developed an automation process, where one of the steps is to call transaction MB1C in background mode and to do some postings in K-stock (expenditure), depending on input data. There are few output types, which are supposed to be attached automaticaly to the newly produced MM document, and further to be printed out by end-users.
Everything goes as expected at development and test stage. Even in production there were allmost allways no problems. But in some unpredicted occations output types are not automaticaly assigned. In case output types are not automaticaly assigned, end user is supposed to assign them manualy, which is annoying (obviously).
The problem does not arise at our testing system.
Due to roll-out of the automation process to more stores at the client' company this problem rises more times.
We have started some investigation, but are stuck up to now.
Does anyone have a clue what might goes wrong and where to push our efforts in order to resolve the problem?
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ivaylo Mutafchiev
SAP consultant
<removed by moderator>
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jan 13, 2012

Hi,
thanks for comment. Perhaps I missed something in my explanation. There are few output types, which are assigned automaticaly to MM-document when it is posted. "Few" means 8. And all of them are assigned as expected in case of manual processing, and even when posted in this automation procecess in background.
Well, I have found the problem. As I explained, this is an automated process. There might be more than 1 document to be created one after another. Allways the 1st document is created correctly with output types assigned, but all next documents (2nd, 3th...) are created without output types assigned automaticaly.
The issues was - there was missing check in the recording RM07M-XNAPR = 'X' (GI/GR slip Print = 'X'), and further output types were not assigned for the 2-nd (and next) documents. Strangely it appears in the document preview (via MB03 for example), even if it was not supplied. Even more strangely, 1-st document gots all the output types assigned, which perhaps was due to some inheriting behaviour.
We reproduced the problem in test system and fixed it.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Ivaylo

Source system assignement in production

Hi all
Before importing any requests which are related to infosource , cubes and update rules into production, do we need to make any source system assignment in production system?
I have directly imported into production but there were no source system / data source assignments to these infosource.
can you please suggest what to do for these souce system assignments in production.
thanks in advance
AN

Hi,
you have to assign the production source system to your BW system. After replication of the DataSources, you can import your development from the BW development system.
Important is the conversion in the SPRO Transaction - Change source system name after transport. In this view you have to type in the source system name of the source system linked to your development system and the name of the source system linked to your production system. During import to production system, BW will automatically change the source system names.
regards
Juergen

Getwa not assigned in SAPLSLVC

Hi All!
I have a problem at the execution of an ALV. I have automaticaly the "Getwa not assigned" dump.
I checked the name of the fields that are in fieldcatalog as I saw on the internet and checked my internal table has the same field than the fieldcatalog, with no result.
Here is the entire message:
    Field symbol has not yet been assigned.
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "SAPLSLVC" had to be terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    You attempted to access an unassigned field symbol
    (data segment 32821).
    This error may occur if
    - You address a typed field symbol before it has been set with
      ASSIGN
    - You address a field symbol that pointed to the line of an
      internal table that was deleted
    - You address a field symbol that was previously reset using
      UNASSIGN or that pointed to a local field that no
      longer exists
    - You address a global function interface, although the
      respective function module is not active - that is, is
      not in the list of active calls. The list of active calls
      can be taken from this short dump.
SAPLSLVC
LSLVCF36
3.267
(FORM)
FILL_DATA_TABLE
Here is my code about fields displayed and fieldcatalog:
DATA: V_VENDORNUM         TYPE LFBK-LIFNR,
      V_VENDORNAME        TYPE LFA1-NAME1,
      V_COUNTRYISOCODE    TYPE T005-INTCA,
      V_BANKKEYS          TYPE LFBK-BANKL,
      V_BANKACCOUNTNUMBER TYPE LFBK-BANKN,
      V_IBAN              TYPE TIBAN-IBAN,
      WA_IBANTABLE        TYPE ZLIGNEIBAN.
      WT_IBANTABLE     TYPE TABLE OF ZLIGNEIBAN.
    MOVE V_VENDORNUM         TO WA_IBANTABLE-VENDORNUM.
    MOVE V_VENDORNAME        TO WA_IBANTABLE-VENDORNAME.
    MOVE V_COUNTRYISOCODE    TO WA_IBANTABLE-COUNTRYISOCODE.
    MOVE V_BANKKEYS          TO WA_IBANTABLE-BANKKEYS.
    MOVE V_BANKACCOUNTNUMBER TO WA_IBANTABLE-BANKACCOUNTNUMBER.
    MOVE V_IBAN              TO WA_IBANTABLE-IBAN.
    APPEND WA_IBANTABLE TO WT_IBANTABLE.
PERFORM ADD_FIELDCAT USING:
     'CodeFournisseur' '!ZLIGNEIBAN-VENDORNUM'         '000010' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T01,
     'NomFournisseur' '!ZLIGNEIBAN-VENDORNAME'        '000030' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T02,
     'CodePays'        '!ZLIGNEIBAN-COUNTRYISOCODE'    '000002' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T03,
     'CodeBanque'      '!ZLIGNEIBAN-BANKKEYS'          '000015' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T04,
     'NumCompte'       '!ZLIGNEIBAN-BANKACCOUNTNUMBER' '000018' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T05,
     'IBAN'            '!ZLIGNEIBAN-IBAN'              '000034' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T06.
Thank you for your help.
PS: Sorry for my bad english, it's not my native language.

Thank you Raymond, it was an error between chair and keyboard. I wrote my titles in the first parameter instead of the fieldname. I had to wrote:
PERFORM ADD_FIELDCAT USING:
     'VENDORNUM'         '!ZLIGNEIBAN-VENDORNUM'         '000010' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T01,
     'VENDORNAME'        '!ZLIGNEIBAN-VENDORNAME'        '000030' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T02,
     'COUNTRYISOCODE'    '!ZLIGNEIBAN-COUNTRYISOCODE'    '000002' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T03,
     'BANKKEYS'          '!ZLIGNEIBAN-BANKKEYS'          '000015' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T04,
     'BANKACCOUNTNUMBER' '!ZLIGNEIBAN-BANKACCOUNTNUMBER' '000018' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T05,
     'IBAN'              '!ZLIGNEIBAN-IBAN'              '000034' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T06.
and not:
PERFORM ADD_FIELDCAT USING:
     'CodeFournisseur' '!ZLIGNEIBAN-VENDORNUM'         '000010' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T01,
     'NomFournisseur' '!ZLIGNEIBAN-VENDORNAME'        '000030' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T02,
     'CodePays'        '!ZLIGNEIBAN-COUNTRYISOCODE'    '000002' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T03,
     'CodeBanque'      '!ZLIGNEIBAN-BANKKEYS'          '000015' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T04,
     'NumCompte'       '!ZLIGNEIBAN-BANKACCOUNTNUMBER' '000018' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T05,
     'IBAN'            '!ZLIGNEIBAN-IBAN'              '000034' 'L' C_SHOW   TEXT-T06.
Thank you again.

Assignment of souces automaticaly in PR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for