Assignment Schedule Vs. When the deployment is available

Hi,
I would like to just have some clarification on deployment scheduling. I created a deployment but I do not want it to run/install until 2/7/2015. So I have set the assignment schedule on the deployment for 2/7/2015. But I see the deployment start time has
the date I created it. I am worried it will install on me right now because it says in monitoring that the program is received. Can you confirm that as long as I have the assignment schedule set, it will not install/run until then? TIA

"Program received" means that the client has downloaded the policy for this deployment.  If it is available now but required in the future, deployments targeting workstations are shown in the Software Center and someone could chose to run
it early. The only time it would automatically install early is if the user had configured "Business Hours" or scheduled it to install early. Usually, this is fine to allow since the user gets to do it at their convenience any time up until the deadline
- and if they chose to do nothing, the system will take care of installing it.
If you really only want it to install on/after 2/7/2015, then you should change the available date to be the same as the required date.
I hope that helps,
Nash
Nash Pherson, Senior Systems Consultant
Now Micro -
My Blog Posts
If you found a bug or want the product to work differently,
share your feedback.
<-- If this post was helpful, please click the up arrow or propose as answer.

Similar Messages

  • When the DPS is available in China?

    I found that DPS is only available in United States,Canada,Mexico now,i can't buy the DPS in China.So i want to know when the DPS is available in China?

    Hi,
    You could contact one of the DPS resellers in Asia Pacific. A list of resellers is available on: http://www.adobe.com/products/digital-publishing-suite-pro/buying-guide-resellers.html ; They might be able to help you.
    With kind regards,
    Klaasjan Tukker

  • Assigned MP errors when I deploy program

    <select class="ratingSelect" disabled="disabled" id="starRating243703" style="display:none;"><option value="-2"></option><option value="-1"></option><option value="0"></option><option
    value="1"></option><option value="2"></option></select>
    0
    i have 1 primary site and 4(site system server) and our company have more than 15000 users and more than 1000 branch 
     Boundaries are set to IP Address  range for all branch 
    - Discovery is performed and successful  
    - Sites are assigned  
    when i deploy program it's get error in locationservices.log  
    ([style="color: #993300;"] 2 assigned MP errors in the last 10 minutes[/style], threshold is 5. LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:00 AM 8836 (0x2284)Attempting to retrieve local MPs from the assigned MP LocationServices 12/9/2014
    11:13:00 AM 8776 (0x2248)Unable to retrieve AD site membership LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:00 AM 8776 (0x2248)Refreshing the Management Point List for site PRI LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:00 AM 8776 (0x2248)Retrieved management point encryption info
    from AD. LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:01 AM 8776 (0x2248)Raising event:instance of CCM_CcmHttp_Status{ ClientID = "GUID:56FBA3BF-91CF-4195-9914-4C1ED87608BE"; DateTime = "20141209081301.044000+000"; HostName = "SCCM.moj.gov.local";
    HRESULT = "0x00000000"; ProcessID = 2780; StatusCode = 0; ThreadID = 8776;}; LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:01 AM 8776 (0x2248)Refreshing trusted key information LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:01 AM 8776 (0x2248)Raising event:instance of CCM_CcmHttp_Status{
    ClientID = "GUID:56FBA3BF-91CF-4195-9914-4C1ED87608BE"; DateTime = "20141209081301.067000+000"; HostName = "SCCM.moj.gov.local"; HRESULT = "0x00000000"; ProcessID = 2780; StatusCode = 0; ThreadID = 8776;}; LocationServices
    12/9/2014 11:13:01 AM 8776 (0x2248)Persisting the management point authentication information in WMI LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:01 AM 8776 (0x2248)Persisted Management Point Authentication Information locally LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:01 AM 8776
    (0x2248)Unable to retrieve AD site membership LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:01 AM 8776 (0x2248)MPLIST requests are throttled for 00:04:38 LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:01 AM 8836 (0x2284)Unable to retrieve AD site membership LocationServices 12/9/2014
    11:13:01 AM 8776 (0x2248)Updated FSP 'SCCM.moj.gov.local' from AD to local. LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:01 AM 8776 (0x2248)Updating portal information. LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:01 AM 8588 (0x218C)[style="color: #993300;"]3 assigned
    MP errors in the last 10 minutes, threshold is 5[/style]. LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:15 AM 8836 (0x2284)4 assigned MP errors in the last 10 minutes, threshold is 5. LocationServices 12/9/2014 11:13:35 AM 8836 (0x2284) 

    program 
    execmgr.log 
    <![LOG[A user has logged on.]LOG]!><time="10:53:31.978-180" date="12-09-2014" component="execmgr" context="" type="1" thread="828" file="execreqmgr.cpp:4912">
    <![LOG[The logged on user is MOJ\aalhasan]LOG]!><time="10:53:31.979-180" date="12-09-2014" component="execmgr" context="" type="1" thread="828" file="execreqmgr.cpp:4931">
    <![LOG[A user has logged on.]LOG]!><time="11:13:00.366-180" date="12-09-2014" component="execmgr" context="" type="1" thread="8380" file="execreqmgr.cpp:4912">
    <![LOG[The logged on user is MOJ\aalhasan]LOG]!><time="11:13:00.518-180" date="12-09-2014" component="execmgr" context="" type="1" thread="8380" file="execreqmgr.cpp:4931">
    <![LOG[CServiceWindowEventHandler::Execute - Received SERVICEWINDOWEVENT : START Event]LOG]!><time="22:00:00.171-180" date="12-09-2014" component="execmgr" context="" type="1" thread="9792"
    file="cservicewindowhandler.cpp:37">
    <![LOG[CExecutionRequestManager::OnServiceWindowEvent for START]LOG]!><time="22:00:00.203-180" date="12-09-2014" component="execmgr" context="" type="1" thread="9792" file="execreqmgr.cpp:8748">
    <![LOG[Auto Install is set to false. Do Nothing.]LOG]!><time="22:00:00.297-180" date="12-09-2014" component="execmgr" context="" type="1" thread="9792" file="execreqmgr.cpp:8760">
    <![LOG[CServiceWindowEventHandler::Execute - Received SERVICEWINDOWEVENT : END Event]LOG]!><time="05:00:00.104-180" date="12-10-2014" component="execmgr" context="" type="1" thread="10496"
    file="cservicewindowhandler.cpp:37">

  • Could a timescale for when the wireless is available be set up please on WLC

    Hi
    I have a number of AP's set up accross the different offices on our corporate network.
    We have just installed an AP at a childres home and found that children are accessing the internet when the lights go out for bedtime. Is there a way of setting up a timescale when children are allowed on access?
    Thank you 

    If you have WCS/NCS or Prime you can schedule the WLAN said to be disable and it enabled by using a template also. Forgot about that one.
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

  • Waiting for the results and when the results are available show them...

    I have an input page, where the user gives an input. When the user submits this input page, the input is submitted to the server side component which does its processing (which is a time consuming process)....till the results are available i need to show a message that the query is being processed and once the results are available i have to show the results. How do i implement this? How will the page come to know when the query is processed and the results are available? please help..

    j2eeprofessional wrote:
    I have an input page, where the user gives an input. When the user submits this input page, the input is submitted to the server side component which does its processing (which is a time consuming process)....till the results are available i need to show a message that the query is being processed and once the results are available i have to show the results. How do i implement this? How will the page come to know when the query is processed and the results are available? please help..Following is the URL for ajax support.
    [ http://livedemo.exadel.com/richfaces-demo/richfaces/status.jsf?c=status&tab=usage|http://livedemo.exadel.com/richfaces-demo/richfaces/status.jsf?c=status&tab=usage]

  • Add a system property when the deployment java command is build by jdevelop

    Hello everybody,
    I have fedora core 4 installed using jdk 1.4.2_06 and JDeveloper 9.0.5.2.
    I have cofigured a connection to a external OC4J standalone where I want to deploy my applications.
    There are a problem between fedora core 4 anda jdk 1.4.2 that it's solved adding the argument "-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true" to the java command when it's run.
    The problem is that I don't know where I must put this parameter so that when I do a deployment to the OC4J Standalone, the command that jdeveloper build include this system property. Now the command that it builds is
    java -jar admin.jar ...
    I need that the command was:
    java -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack -jar admin.jar ...
    Thank you very much in advance.

    I'll see this menu, but it allow to configure the internal OC4J standalone of the JDeveloper.
    I want to deploy to an OC4J standalone that is external to JDeveloper, and that is running in another machine.

  • Assigning a seat when the user clicks on link it advises contact tech support

    I have successfully assigned a seat to a user and when they click on the link in the email it advises there is an error and to contacty technical support
    thanks

    The error indicates that the user has not
    logged in as Admin with complete permission & privilege, more over the
    restrictions are due to firewall & security of the IT department.
    I would request you to contact our
    technical team  chat via http://adobe.ly/yxj0t6
    to get complete resolution.
    Kind Regards,
    Rajshree

  • I pre-ordered an album on itunes and payed $5.99. I got an email with the receipt and details in my email. When the album was available i downloaded it, but it gave me a really hard time. When I finally got it to download, itunes charged me another $6.

    How can I file a complaint for Itunes charging me extra for pre-order when I already payed for it?

    Go here:
    http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/
    and follow the instructions to report the issue to the iTunes Store.
    Regards.

  • When the upgrade is available, will there be a charge?

    Will there be an upgrade charge for the next IOS download to the Ipad2?

    Dian-
    My guess is that there will not be a charge.  There was none to upgrade from iOS 3 to 4.
    Of course Apple may decide other wise.  However, I think they are getting paid very well for their hardware, and don't want anything to discourage sales.
    Fred

  • How does the assignment schedule actually work?

    Hi,
    I have a task sequence deployed to some servers and checking the status of it, it says that "Program Received" but I don't see it in software center. I have it set so that it is available today the 17th with an assignment schedule for tomorrow
    at 3:00. My question is what actually is the assignment schedule for? Is that when it will actually be on the client and running?

    Hi,
    The available time is when they clients will see the new policy and start to download the requred packages in the TS depending on the settings you have made for the TS and the assignment schedule is when the installation will actually take place.
    Regards,
    Jörgen
    -- My System Center blog ccmexec.com -- Twitter
    @ccmexec

  • When deploy: Wizard error a connection to the deployment share could not be made "check physical connection"

    Hello everybody,
    yet another issue with deploying a masterdisk. I will give you a short explanation of the situation.
    I need to deploy Windows 8.1 PRO x86. 
    Using: Microsoft Deployment Workbench Microsoft Version: 6.2.5019.0
    1. Reference PC: Windows 8.1 PRO x86 is installed on ORACLE Virtual Box.
    2.  I installed  MDT on my workstation Windows 7 x64, where "C:\DeploymentShare\Windows8" is located.
    3. To change the Unattended.xml file, I have second ORACLE Virtual Box with
    Windows 8.1 PRO x86 with MDT, which connected to the DeploymentShare of Windows 7 x64.
     - The reason is because the Reference PC is x86 and the Unattended.xml file can be changed only if MDT is installed on x86 Windows, otherwise it is not possible.
    The image capture is successful.
    Then I create bootable USB device using rufus-1.4.12.exe. I use: C:\DeploymentShare\Windows8\Boot\LiteTouchPE_x86.iso
    I use a real PC (not virtual machine) and when the deployment starts
    I see: 
    1 Welcome screen, where I select: Run the deployment wizard to  install a new operating system.
    2. The next screen is an error screen where I see the error: 
    "Wizard error
    A connection to the deployment share (\\ComputerName\C\DeployemntShare )could not be made
    DHCP Lease was not obtained for any Networking devices!
    Possible cause: Check physical connection
    I am relatively new with MDT.
    Any suggestions are more than welcome.

    Nick,
    Thank you for the answer!
    Yesterday, I figured out that I need to create an offline bootable disk. 
    The issue is caused, because creating a bootable disk with rufus.exe include only the ISO file and not the WIM file. That is the reason why during OS installation process it asks me for the shared folder...

  • What is needed to run the deployment utility while not logged into Windows?

    I am running a bash script to perform nightly builds of our test s/w. This script calls the deployment utility via command line. The actual command I am using is:
    /cygdrive/c/Program\ Files/National\ Instruments/TestStand\ 4.1.1/Components/Tools/Deployment\ Utility/DeploymentUtility -- build "C:\Sandbox\ATE\Production_Test_Projects\eHLC_RX\Deployment\Unified_eHLC_RX_Test_Deployment_Config.tsd"
    It works flawlessly as long as I am logged into the PC. I have a cron job running to invoke my main script on a daily basis. As soon as I log out of the PC is when I am having the trouble. The script does get started but when looking at the processes on the PC I see my bash sessions open as well as the deployment utility open but it is not doing anything. If I end the deployment utility process the bash script continues and exits normally. Is there something I have to put in the command line to make the deployment utility work if I am not logged in? I have the cron running as a service and it is using my username and pw when required. But the deployment utility just hangs and does nothing. The deployment utility log is blank so it was basically opened but did not perform the build. Any ideas as to what may be causing this? Thanks in advance for any help.
    Troy

    Here is a little more information. I changed the service that is running my script which is calling the Deployment Utility via command line from This Account on the Log On tab which requires my username and password to Local System Account and checked Allow Service to Interact with Desktop. This time when I was logged out of the PC and the script started I logged back on and could see the message that was thrown when the Deployment Utility was initialized. I could not see this with the service set to the other parameter because it is running in the back ground. I am sure this is what is happening because in this state I check the processes on the PC and it is reflecting the same information. The memory usage is the same and the Deployment Utility is doing nothing obviously waiting for acknowledgement of this error. If I click OK the build does start but at the end I get all types of debug messages at the end which do not happen when I am logged in and this process completes. Does anyone have any idea what this error message is referring to and maybe how to fix it?
    Thanks again for any help.
    Attachments:
    Startup_Error.JPG ‏80 KB

  • Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA

    Issue Summary
    In Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72 and Java 1.8 Update 25 Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA.  We've noticed this with Oracle Forms and Reports 11g where we have forms that specify Java 1.6 Update 20.  We used to be able to specify Java 1.6 Update 26 in our Ruleset, but now the only version a that works in our ruleset is Java 1.6 Update 20 which is the same version requested by the JPI-Version attribute of the jar.  The long term solution would be to upgrade Oracle Forms and Reports, however this isn't currently in the cards.
    RuleSet.xml Test
    Ruleset.xml

    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    &lt;ruleset version=&quot;1.0+&quot;&gt;  
    &lt;rule&gt;
       &lt;id location=&quot;*.javatester.org&quot; /&gt;
       &lt;action permission=&quot;run&quot; version=&quot;1.6*&quot; /&gt;
    &lt;/rule&gt;
    &lt;ruleset version=&quot;1.0+&quot;&gt;
    &lt;rule&gt;
       &lt;id location=&quot;*.internaldomain.name&quot; /&gt;
       &lt;action permission=&quot;run&quot; version=&quot;1.6*&quot; /&gt;
    &lt;/rule&gt;
    &lt;/ruleset&gt;
    Test 1 (Control)
    Installed Java Versions:
    – 1.7 Update 51 b13 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    – 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    Deployment Ruleset works as expected for both URLs
    Test 2
    Installed Java Versions:
    – 1.7 Update 72 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    – 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
    The RuleSet works for JavaTester.org however on internaldomain.name we get the following error:
    With the trace logging turned on, I suspected the version attribute supplied by the RIA. I was able to trick Java by adding the following to my system deployment.properties file:
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.product=1.6.0_20
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.path=C\:\\Program Files (x86)\\Java\\jre6\\bin\\javaw.exe
    deployment.javaws.jre.0.enabled=true
    Because the RIA requests 1.6.0_20 it matches 1.6* from the deployment ruleset sooner than 1.6.0_26. However, if 1.6.0_20 is not available 1.6.0_26 should match according to the Deployment Rule Set documentation:
    http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/security/deployment_rules.html
    The version of the JRE that is used is determined by the following order of precedence:
    1. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
    2. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
    3. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches the version attribute.
    4. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches the version attribute.
    If no version is available that meets the criteria, then the RIA is blocked, and a message is shown to the user. To provide a custom message, include the message element.
    As a result:
    If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA and 1.6.0_20 is listed in the deployment.properties file, #1 matches.
    If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA, but 1.6.0_20 is NOT listed in the deployment.properties file the #1 SHOULD match, but doesn’t. It used to match up-to and including JRE 1.7 Update 51 however the ruleset appears to no longer match in subsequent versions.
    #2 should never match with our current Deployment Ruleset. It would match if we specified 1.7* as a version in the Ruleset.xml.
    #3 used to be broken as well after JRE 1.7 Update 51 however this bug has been marked as fixed. See: http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8032781
    I have reproduced this issue with Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72, and Java 1.8 Update 25 when one of these versions are installed with Java 1.6 Update 26.

    I can't seem to edit this post anymore, for some odd reason.
    So here goes;
    I found this post in NVIDIA's knowledge base;
    When installing an after-market graphics card into a certified Windows 8 PC with UEFI enabled, the s...
    The interesting parts in this post are as follows;
    When an after-market graphics card is installed into a motherboard with UEFI enabled in the system BIOS, or if the system is a certified Windows 8 PC with Secure Boot enabled, the system may not boot.
    UEFI is a new system BIOS feature that is provided on most new motherboards. A UEFI system BIOS is required in order for the Windows 8 Secure Boot feature to work. Secure boot is enabled by default on certified Windows 8 PCs.
    In order to get the PC to boot with a graphics card that does not contain UEFI firmware, the end-user must first disable the secure boot feature in the system's SBIOS before installing the graphics card.
    Note: Some system SBIOS's incorporate a feature called compatibility boot. These systems will detect a non-UEFI-enabled firmware VBIOS and allow the user to disable secure boot and then proceed with a compatibility boot. If the system contains a system SBIOS the supports compatibility boot, the user will need to disable secure boot when asked during boot process
    This leads me to believe that the BIOS update that wrecked my setup was 9SKT58A/9SJT58A, which only contains one change;
    "Adds support for updating BIOS from a WIN7 BIOS to a WIN8 BIOS".
    I've just ordered a cheap UEFI-compatible GT640 from Gainward, so I hope I'll be able to try that out this weekend.

  • KM Scheduler error when deploying

    Hi all,
                Can any one guide me on this ? I have created a KM scheduler and have added some customized code in it, but when I deploy the project all I am getting is an error message "Build on the project failed". Could anyone tell me the cause of this?

    Hello,
    Did you build the project before deploying ?
    Are you getting this error at the time of deployment or at the time of building the project.Make sure that the build is successfull before the deployment.
    Regards,
    Vinod

  • Schedule Line Date Showing in future in Sales Order though the Stock is available in system on same date

    Hello All,
    Good Morning,
    We have received an Incident where in the Sales Order during the ATP Check we do user is getting the future schedule line date in future as enclosed in the screen shot below. User has created the Sales Order on 12052014 for 7 line items. For the Line Item 7 the Stock is available in the system on same day but still after ATP Check the date is shown in future.
    I wan to replicate the scenario in Quality to find the exact bug to fix the Issue but not able to replicate for same customer and material i am getting the current date as confirmed delivery date. please guide me if you can share some inputs so that i can go in right direct and fix the issue.
    Please respond it is critical Issue.
    Thanks,
    Farhan.

    Hello All Experts,
    Many Thanks for all the Inputs you have given.
    Finally we have replicated the Issue in Quality 2 Days Back and Indeed it was great Achievement.
    Finally We have given to Abaper to debug it find the root cause.
    Let me summarise the actual Issue.
    Issue : Sales Order Schedule Line showing future date for the Materials which are having Product Allocation even though the Stock is available and Allocation Qty also available in the PA Master Data we maintained..
    We created one Sales Order for Line Item A and B. Line Item A is having Product Allocation. When we created Sales Order for both Line Item A and B we got Schedule Line Date as 13.06.2014. Then we Schedule the Re-Scheduling Job in V_V2 and check the effect. For Line Item A the Schedule Line Date got changed to 01.07.2014 and Line Item B it was same as before.
    Would like to know is there any config setting at Schedule Line Level we have missed just want to cross check if there is any or something in Product Allocation Configuration.
    Please refer screen shots below for more details of Sales Order before and after effect in Re-Scheduling.
    Please provide your inputs on this.
    Thanks,
    Farhan.

Maybe you are looking for