Assignments of materials and vendors to inspection plans for the plant 1500

Hi to all,
Please give me solution for make assignments of materials and vendors to inspection plans for the plant 1500.
Thanks,
NAgesh

hi gang,
try to make usage decision ,kindly check in material document which you have created while making the GR, check in which storgare location you have specified and try to transfer the stock from quality to unrestricted.and also make a note on batch number also if you have activated the batch management
regards
thyagarajan

Similar Messages

How to use Same Inspection plan for Multiple Plants?

Hello,
When I create a Process Order for material (M1), release and save it for a Plant A then I get the Inspection lot automatically.
Now I have another Plant B that we have created. We would like to use the same Inspection plan that has been created for Plant A and M1
So in the changed mode(QP02) of the Inspection plan for Plant A in the material assignment tab I added the Material M1 and the Plant B. I am assuming this means when I create the Process order for M1 in Plant B then it should use the same Inspection plan.
But when I create the Process Order for M1 for Plant B, release and save it then it does not created the Inspection lot automatically(though I can create Inspection lot manually)
Can you tell me if there is setting that will allow me to create the Inspection lot automatically on saving the Process order which should use the Inspection plan that I just assigned.
And also let me know if there is a better way to handle same Inspection Plan for same material but multiple Plants.
Thanks
SAP Fans...

Dear,
For your message my understanding is that you are not getting Inspection lot created in Plant"B". Inspection lot for a material would get created based on the Inspection Setup for the material master "QM View", so compare the QM for the material in both plants and correct it for Plant "B".
Probably I feel Inspection Setup is not complete for the material in Plant "B" - Generally when extending material by copying referance, in the QM view you need to click the Inspection Setup Button, for the data to be copied...otherwise it does not copy the Inspection setup from the referance plant.
Regards,
Prasobh

How to set up the inspection plan for the material in super BOM

Hello,
how to get the accurate inspection plan of the IQC for the material which was class item in a super BOM?
I've gotten the characteristic value from the sales order, and get the PO after MPR. The problem is how to specify the target value and the range of inspection characteristic in inspection plan, because the value is temporary?
Thanks!
Lin

Hello,
I think you need to create MIC which linked with the configuration characteristic, and specify "inspection by configuration" for the inspection type.
then the configuration value in the sales order can be transfered to the inspection lot when production released or goods receipts if you use inspection type 03 or 04. that means the value range for the MIC will be determined dynamically for each sales order.
Regards, Winnie

Two Inspection Plan for the same work centre

Hi Gurus,
I need your help,one of my client needs the following requriment.
1. He is having the two workcentre A and B
2. A has lesser tolarance and b has the higher tolarance
3.While confirmation the plan associated to the lesser or higher tolarance has to be automatically assign to the inspection lot.
I think in standard SAP, it canot be done
Kindly suggest me way out
Thanks in advance
Jai

Hi Jai,
1. You can go with the solution given by Mr. Reddy, You can cretate two insepction plans with two different tolerances assign the same material to both, system will give a prompt before releasing the lot for RR.
2. You create singal insepction plan, assign the Both materail to it then, in the charecteristics overview screen, select the Charecteristics that is having differnt tolerence, and then you can use the Dependant charecteristic.
Reward points is helpfull
Regards,.
Shyamal

How to map revision level materials to already created inspection plan?

Dear All,
I have created single inspection plan for many existing raw materials. Now it has been found that each raw material have different revision level as well as valid from date.
My inspection plan is created on 02.07.2014 and each raw material has different revision level with valid from date which is also very old (like 11.03.2012 for revision level 09).
My Requirement is: how to correct my inspection plan?, so that it will work for each assigned raw material and there will not be any material revision level wise problem created for the inspection lot so that my inspection lot should be created in REL status in QA32 transaction i.e. inspection lot is assigned automatically as per standard SAP functionality.
Thanks,
Narresh

Hi Amol,
Thanks for your reply.
In this business scenario, we are not creating inspection plan for each raw material because there is similarity in inspection for 40-50 raw materials and total number of raw materials are around 500. This will be very difficult and unnecessarily data creation in the system.
As per my understanding revision level is for material master revision and if material master changes then how it affect so much on inspection plan? also is it means that for every revision in future we will have to create new inspection plan? hence I believe that if I will make back dated inspection plan for raw materials then it may work. Is my understanding is correct?
Expecting much better solution from QM experts.
Thanks,
Narresh

Muliple inspection plan for same material and same usage

Hi,
I need to create multiple inspection plans for same material with same usage.during the inspection lot creation i need to select any one inspection plan.
In standard SAP its not possible.Any user exits available for this..
Regards,
S.P.Selvathangam

Dear Selvathangam Palanisamy ,
My Dear Shayamal is absolutely correct and we are corrently using this SAP facility. You can create 'N' number of inspectio plans for a material and then whenever the inspection lot will created ( Thru a process order or Manual) then you will get the Inspection Lot Status 'CRTD' (Created mode) then you have to select your Inspection Task list manually by two way...
Either go to QA02 and then select it from the list of multiple plans.
Or you can directly go from QA32 ...select your inspection lot row and directly click on the Inspection Lot icon to go directly to the inspection lot window to slect the Task list.
Further there is no need to remove the Automatic Assignment from the QM View of the Material Master as if there is only one task List then system will automatically assign the TASK LIST, if you deselect it then you have to select in every case.
Thanks

SAP QM Default Inspection Plan for all Inspection Lots created in the Plant

Scenario: We have a Proto type plant in which Daily 15 to 20 materials are created every day. We have only one inspection plan for all the materials.
Problem: We don't want to do material assignment in the Inspection Plant header every time a new material is created
Requirement: Is there any way to default the inspection plan for all the inspection lots created in the Plant by Standard Configuration or User Exit.
Your answers will be much appreciated and rewarded.
Thanks in advance,
Thiyagu

Hi,
In our case Creation of Inspection lots are controlled by QM View of Material Master. Our problem is to find alternative for assignment of New Materials in the Plan header in Tcode QP02, as we have only ONE INSPECTION PLAN. So our expection is all QM Inspection Lot created in the Plant should always get assigned to the SINGLE INSPECTION PLAN, with out doing any assignment of material in the Plan.
Thanks,
Thiyagu.

Using inspection plan in multiple plants

Hi,
I would like to use one inspection plan in multiple plants. Are there any disadvantages or pitfalls? (besides the fact that if I use workcenters, the same workcenters must exist in all plants using the plan)
Marcus.

I love to use material specs. They can be used alone or in conjunction with a plan.
There are several reasons why plans must be used in certain situations.
Dynamic modification is one of the big ones. You can only use DMR in inspection plans.
You also need plans to work with PRT assignments.
Security based on workcenters. Some plants require that only certain techs or personnel perform certain inspections. And the people who can do results recording is strictly monitored. This is especially true for those using SAP in the Pharm and food industries.
Using calculated characteristics. These can only be taken advantage of if your use inspection plans.
Enginerring change management. Plans can used ECM to track and document changes. Another big requirment in Pharma and food.
If a material spec is used it is an all or nothing situation. In many places, there might be 20 or 30 characteristics on a given material spec. If you inspect by material spec then all the characteristics in the material spec are copied into the inspection lot. If you inspect in conjunction with a plan, any characteristics that don't match up with an inspection plan characteristic are appended to the last operation of the plan.
Since in many places, inspections are done at various stages, or maybe derived from batch derivation, they often want to pick and choose what tests get performed at what inspection. A good example would be 03 and 04 lots. Many places might test some characteristics via the 03 inspection that get the tests from the routing/receipe. If the test is done in a later operation, there may not be any need to repeat the test in the 04 inspection lot. Using a material spec, they wouldn't have that flexibility. Anther example are 09 recurring inspections. Many companies may only inspect a certain subset of characteristics to requalify the material at reinspection.
Capturing costs for specific testing must use an inspection plan. (yes, you can use general QM order in the material master if you want, but the operation header of a plan has various values and settings for working with costs)
And now in 6.0, if you want to use the multiple spec functionality, you have to use inspection plans.
If you integrate with EH&S and maintain specs in EH&S then EH&S can create and update all the inspection plans as changes are made. But not material specs.
I think I hit some of the big reasons, I'm sure others can probably come up with ones I've missed.
Craig
Edited by: Craig Snyder on May 1, 2008 9:35 PM

Measuring Instrument Needs to be added in inspection plan for each part

Hi
How to assign the Measuring Instrument in the quality inspection plan for all the materials.
Whether i need to assign as material assignment or as PRT.
how to use prt to assign to the operation in the quality plan (task list)
Thanks
VRAJ

Hi,
when i try to assign the Equipment for first Inspection Characteristics.
the system thru the ERROR as,
Production resource/tool is not intended for this type of task list
Message no. CF230
Diagnosis
You want to use the production resource/tool in a task list or work order with task list type Q. However, according to usage 004 of the PRT, this task list type does not exist.
Procedure
Change the usage of the PRT in the master record or select a PRT which can be used in this task list type.
How to resolve this issue.

Inspection plan for inprocess inspection

Hi QM Gurus
please let me know can I use an inspection plan for inprocess inspection
Thanks
TR

Dear,
Inspection Plan is similar to routing, which will indicate what are all characteristics need to be checked / inspected when you receive a material. Is a master data. Once the inspection lot is created we will check the inspection plan and perform the inspection and give the defects recording and usage decision for the inspection lots.
So for inspection type 03 use routing with usage as 1 and status as 4 and control key as PP04 to specify the inspection characteristics.
when u cofirm that perticular operation it will ask to record the results. Inspection lot get genarated during order release this we can see in the order header data assignment tab. PP04 assignement says this operation is relevent for inprocess inspection and we need to assign MIC's for this which are relevent created in QS21 for this also sampling procedure created in QDV1.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Inspection plan for Pipelines?

Dear SAPIENTS,
Business scenario: Various pipelines located in plan and need regular inspection depending upon requirement. It can be 3 MOnth, 6 MOnth or anything. Inspection lot and result recording required.
Doubt: How can i link pipelines in system and how can i create inspection plan for them?
Regards,

Dear,
If i create as a equipment than where should i enter about its functional location and installation details.
i.e the reason i am asking if create an object link for the pipeline between two equipment or functional location than how can i create lot, notification for this link?
Regards,

Is it possible to create inspection plan for "Inprocess Inspection"

Hi,
Is it possible to create inspection plans for "Inprocess Inspection".
If yes , what would be the "task List Usage".Is it "1"?
If no ,then how to map this requirment?
Regards
Vemula

Hi
Vemula
Generally as Per SAP std Routing is used for inspection of 03 type of inspection.
but you can also customize the Inspection task list Usage for Inprocess Inspection.
This is possible through
QCC0>Quality Inspection>Insp lot creation>Assign Insp type to origine>
here informt of 03 inspection type you can assign
Task list type:Q
Usage:either 1(Production) or 3(Universal)
save
Regards
Poonam

There is Region Support for Cornish, Irish Gaelic, Manx and Welsh - why is it not available in Scottish Gaelic? Is it planned for the future?

There is Region Support for Cornish, Irish Gaelic, Manx and Welsh - why is it not available in Scottish Gaelic? Is it planned for the future?

http://apple.com/feedback
-Make your suggestion there so the right people see it.

What would the pricing be for adobe web hosting for me; I all ready have CS3 creative suite, an existing plan for the new Photoshop and Lightroom 5. But I need also to use Muse?

What would the pricing be for adobe web hosting for me; I all ready have CS3 creative suite, an existing plan for the new Photoshop and Lightroom 5. But I need also to use Muse?

Hello Fpless,
For more information regarding your request, I would advise you to please get in touch with our Sales Team by phone.
Phone number: 802 06016 (dial from Denmark)
Thank you.
Arnaud.

CBO generating different plans for the same data in similar Environments

Hi All
I have been trying to compare an SQL from 2 different but similar environments build of the same hardware specs .The issue I am facing is environment A, the query executes in less than 2 minutes with plan mostly showing full table scans and hash join whereas in environment B(problematic), it times out after 2 hours with an error of unable to extend table space . The statistics are up to date in both environments for both tables and indexes . System parameters are exactly similar(default oracle for except for multiblock_read_count ).
Both Environment have same db parameter for db_file_multiblock_read_count(16), optimizer(refer below),hash_area_size (131072),pga_aggregate_target(1G),db_block_size(8192) etc . SREADTIM, MREADTIM, CPUSPEED, MBRC are all null in aux_stats in both environment because workload was never collected i believe.
Attached is details about the SQL with table stats, SQL and index stats my main concern is CBO generating different plans for the similar data and statistics and same hardware and software specs. Is there any thing else I should consider .I generally see environment B being very slow and always plans tend to nested loops and index scan whereas what we really need is a sensible FTS in many cases. One of the very surprising thing is METER_CONFIG_HEADER below which has just 80 blocks of data is being asked for index scan.
show parameter optimizer
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
**Environment**
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE     10.2.0.4.0     Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Note: : There are slight difference in the no of records in the attached sheet.However, I wanted to tell that i have tested with exact same data and was getting similar results but I couldn't retain the data untill collecting the details in the attachment
TEST1     COMPARE TABLE LEVE STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME     NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS     LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET     3607425     167760     5/02/2013 22:11
METER_CONFIG_HEADER     3658     80     5/01/2013 0:07
METER_CONFIG_ITEM     32310     496     5/01/2013 0:07
NMI     1899024     33557     18/02/2013 10:55
REGISTER     4830153     101504     18/02/2013 9:57
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     1607456     19137     18/02/2013 15:48
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     5110781     78691     18/02/2013 9:56
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     1425890     42468     18/02/2013 13:54
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME     NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS     LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET     4133939     198570     16/02/2013 10:02
METER_CONFIG_HEADER     3779     80     16/02/2013 10:55
METER_CONFIG_ITEM     33720     510     16/02/2013 10:55
NMI     1969000     33113     16/02/2013 10:58
REGISTER     5837874     120104     16/02/2013 11:05
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     1788152     22325     16/02/2013 11:06
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     6101934     91088     16/02/2013 11:07
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     1447589     43804     16/02/2013 11:11
TEST ITEM 2     COMPARE INDEX STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME     INDEX_NAME     UNIQUENESS     BLEVEL     LEAF_BLOCKS     DISTINCT_KEYS     AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     CLUSTERING_FACTOR     NUM_ROWS
ASSET     IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     9878     67     147     12982     869801     3553095
ASSET     IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     7291     2747     2     639     1755977     3597916
ASSET     SYS_C00102592     UNIQUE     2     12488     3733831     1     1     3726639     3733831
METER_CONFIG_HEADER     SYS_C0092052     UNIQUE     1     12     3670     1     1     3590     3670
METER_CONFIG_ITEM     SYS_C0092074     UNIQUE     1     104     32310     1     1     32132     32310
NMI     IDX_NMI_ID     NONUNIQUE     2     6298     844853     1     2     1964769     1965029
NMI     IDX_NMI_ID_NK     NONUNIQUE     2     6701     1923072     1     1     1922831     1923084
NMI     IDX_NMI_STATS     NONUNIQUE     1     106     4     26     52     211     211
REGISTER     REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM     NONUNIQUE     2     12498     795     15     2899     2304831     4711808
REGISTER     SYS_C00102653     UNIQUE     2     16942     5065660     1     1     5056855     5065660
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     3667     1607968     1     1     1607689     1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SDP_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     3811     668727     1     2     1606204     1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     SYS_C00102665     UNIQUE     2     5116     1529606     1     1     1528136     1529606
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     SYS_C00102677     UNIQUE     2     17370     5193638     1     1     5193623     5193638
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     4406     676523     1     2     1423247     1425890
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     7374     676523     1     2     1458238     1461108
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     SYS_C00102687     UNIQUE     2     4737     1416207     1     1     1415022     1416207
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME     INDEX_NAME     UNIQUENESS     BLEVEL     LEAF_BLOCKS     DISTINCT_KEYS     AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     CLUSTERING_FACTOR     NUM_ROWS
ASSET     IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     8606     121     71     16428     1987833     4162257
ASSET     IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     8432     1780146     1     1     2048170     4162257
ASSET     SYS_C00116157     UNIQUE     2     13597     4162263     1     1     4158759     4162263
METER_CONFIG_HEADER     SYS_C00116570     UNIQUE     1     12     3779     1     1     3734     3779
METER_CONFIG_ITEM     SYS_C00116592     UNIQUE     1     107     33720     1     1     33459     33720
NMI     IDX_NMI_ID     NONUNIQUE     2     6319     683370     1     2     1970460     1971313
NMI     IDX_NMI_ID_NK     NONUNIQUE     2     6597     1971293     1     1     1970771     1971313
NMI     IDX_NMI_STATS     NONUNIQUE     1     98     48     2     4     196     196
REGISTER     REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM     NONUNIQUE     2     15615     1273     12     2109     2685924     5886582
REGISTER     SYS_C00116748     UNIQUE     2     19533     5886582     1     1     5845565     5886582
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     4111     1795084     1     1     1758441     1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SDP_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     4003     674249     1     2     1787987     1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     SYS_C004520     UNIQUE     2     5864     1795130     1     1     1782147     1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     SYS_C004539     UNIQUE     2     20413     6152850     1     1     6073059     6152850
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     3227     660649     1     2     1422572     1447803
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     6399     646257     1     2     1346948     1349993
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     SYS_C00128706     UNIQUE     2     4643     1447946     1     1     1442796     1447946
TEST ITEM 3     COMPARE PLANS
ENVIRONMENT A
Plan hash value: 4109575732
| Id | Operation                       | Name                   | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                        |    13 | 2067 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|   1 | HASH UNIQUE                    |                        |    13 | 2067 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 2 |   HASH JOIN                     |                        |    13 | 2067 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 3 |    HASH JOIN                    |                        |     6 |   900 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:04 |
|* 4 |     HASH JOIN ANTI              |                        |     1 |   137 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:03 |
|* 5 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| NMI                    |     1 |    22 |       |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS              |                        |     1 |   131 |       | 95137   (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 7 |        HASH JOIN                |                        |     1 |   109 |       | 95132   (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 8 |         TABLE ACCESS FULL       | ASSET                  | 36074 | 1021K|       | 38553   (2)| 00:07:43 |
|* 9 |         HASH JOIN               |                        | 90361 | 7059K| 4040K| 56578   (2)| 00:11:19 |
|* 10 |          HASH JOIN              |                        | 52977 | 3414K| 2248K| 50654   (2)| 00:10:08 |
|* 11 |           HASH JOIN             |                        | 39674 | 1782K|       | 40101   (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 12 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL    | REGISTER               | 39439 | 1232K|       | 22584   (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 13 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL    | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   | 4206K|    56M|       | 17490   (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 14 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL     | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT |   675K|    12M|       | 9412   (2)| 00:01:53 |
|* 15 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL      | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET      | 1178K|    15M|       | 4262   (2)| 00:00:52 |
|* 16 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN         | IDX_NMI_ID_NK          |     2 |       |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 17 |      VIEW                       |                        | 39674 |   232K|       | 40101   (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 18 |       HASH JOIN                 |                        | 39674 | 1046K|       | 40101   (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 19 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL        | REGISTER               | 39439 |   500K|       | 22584   (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 20 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL        | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   | 4206K|    56M|       | 17490   (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 21 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL           | METER_CONFIG_HEADER    | 3658 | 47554 |       |    19   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 22 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL            | METER_CONFIG_ITEM      | 7590 | 68310 |       |   112   (2)| 00:00:02 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
   3 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
   4 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
   5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
   7 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD" AND "SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
   8 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
   9 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
10 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
11 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
12 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR
              SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
13 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
18 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
19 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR
              SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
20 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
22 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
ENVIRONMENT B
Plan hash value: 2826260434
| Id | Operation                            | Name                   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                     |                        |     1 |   181 |   103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|   1 | HASH UNIQUE                         |                        |     1 |   181 |   103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 2 |   HASH JOIN ANTI                     |                        |     1 |   181 |   103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 3 |    HASH JOIN                         |                        |     1 |   176 | 56855   (2)| 00:11:23 |
|* 4 |     HASH JOIN                        |                        |     1 |   163 | 36577   (2)| 00:07:19 |
|* 5 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     | ASSET                  |     1 |    44 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                   |                        |     1 |   131 | 9834   (2)| 00:01:59 |
|   7 |        NESTED LOOPS                  |                        |     1 |    87 | 9830   (2)| 00:01:58 |
|   8 |         NESTED LOOPS                 |                        |     1 |    74 | 9825   (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 9 |          HASH JOIN                   |                        |     1 |    52 | 9820   (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 10 |           TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| METER_CONFIG_HEADER    |     1 |    14 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 |            NESTED LOOPS              |                        |     1 |    33 |   116   (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 12 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL        | METER_CONFIG_ITEM      |     1 |    19 |   115   (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 13 |             INDEX RANGE SCAN         | SYS_C00116570          |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL          | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT |   723K|    13M| 9699   (2)| 00:01:57 |
|* 15 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | NMI                    |     1 |    22 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IDX_NMI_ID_NK          |     2 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET      |     1 |    13 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 |          INDEX RANGE SCAN            | IDX_SLA_SDP_SK         |     2 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN              | IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK |     2 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | REGISTER               | 76113 | 2378K| 26743   (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 21 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL                | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   | 5095K|    63M| 20245   (2)| 00:04:03 |
| 22 |    VIEW                              |                        | 90889 |   443K| 47021   (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 23 |     HASH JOIN                        |                        | 90889 | 2307K| 47021   (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 24 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | REGISTER               | 76113 |   966K| 26743   (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 25 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   | 5095K|    63M| 20245   (2)| 00:04:03 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
   3 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK" AND
              "SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
   4 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD")
   5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
   9 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
10 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
12 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
13 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
17 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
18 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
19 - access("SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
20 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR
              SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
23 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
24 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR
              SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
25 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:16 PM
Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:18 PM

Hi Paul,
I misread your question initially .The system stats are outdated in both ( same result as seen from aux_stats) .I am not a DBA and do not have access to gather system stats fresh.
select * from sys.aux_stats$
SNAME     PNAME     PVAL1     PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO     STATUS     NULL     COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO     DSTART     NULL     02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO     DSTOP     NULL     02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO     FLAGS     1     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     CPUSPEEDNW     1321.20523     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     IOSEEKTIM     10     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     IOTFRSPEED     4096     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     SREADTIM     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     MREADTIM     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     CPUSPEED     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     MBRC     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     MAXTHR     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     SLAVETHR     NULL     NULL

Assignments of materials and vendors to inspection plans for the plant 1500

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for