Assistance with upgrade paths?

I'm planning to upgrade my system/software and would appreciate any comments the forum's readers may offer. I have an ongoing small photography business and want to make sure I don't disrupt it by changing more than I can handle. Pending changes include:
. upgrading hardware from Quicksilver dual 1.0 to 24" iMac
. implicit in that upgrade is OSX 10.4 --> 10.5
. upgrading Photoshop from CS2 to CS3 to get performance benefits of Intel technology
. adding Aperture to workflow and photo management
. adding 1TB drive for additional storage/backup
Current setup: probably 100 photo/job folders, with a couple of hundred customer folders, and thousands of photos and versions of photos. These are on a dedicated internal drive. iPhoto used for proofs and display, with duplicate photos of many of the files on the dedicated drive. iPhoto and iTunes libraries share a dedicated internal disk. I think a separate iPhoto library for business photos might make sense. Need to look at that and ease of switching between libraries.
If I were to do all this at once, I can envision being out of business for weeks. What seems to make sense is a sequence like:
. decide on backup strategy and disk map. (QS has 4 internal drives, and probably about 350GB of data, total. Too much to fit on an internal iMac drive and allow growth. The 1TB drive will easily handle growth, but needs to be set up as a RAID, or individual disks, and with partitions to handle tasks. Not sure yet how to handle backup. I think I want to avoid Time Machine for a while until it matures, but need more research to choose a replacement.
. upgrade the hardware and migrate files. Run this way for a few weeks to shake things out.
. upgrade Photoshop from CS2 to CS3. One concern is Photoshop CS2 performance on an Intel mac. I could accept equivalent performance to the QS system, with the future move to CS3 providing the performance benefit. Would it be equivalent? Is CS3 significantly different from CS2 that I would have a big learning curve to overcome?
. add Apperture
Thanks for getting this far with this kind of "stream of consciousness" rambling, and if you have any illuminating comments from your experiences, I could sure use the help.
Ben

Perry,
Thanks for the reply.
The Apple store, too, recommended the Mac Pro. It's not a bad idea, and I've thought about it. I could use 2 of my current 4 internal disks in the Pro and not have to find an external enclosure for them. Expandability is not so much an issue, I don't think. The only additions to my QS are USB ports and a SATA card for features that the iMac has. But come to think of it, that's exactly why expandability is worthwhile. If the QS had been an iMac instead, it wouldn't have been able to benefit from USB 2.0 ports and SATA drive speeds. It would have been out of date sooner. I'll think about that. Maybe with a less expensive Dell 24" monitor. Apple's monitor prices are high.
I'm not too concerned about USB devices, since they "hub" pretty well. I know what you mean about port availability, though; I counted my devices the other day and ended up with 16! i couldn't believe it, except I always seem to be unplugging something to plug something else in. More Firewire ports is probably a very good idea. I've now got 3 devices, and I would expect in the future there will be more "must haves" that will need Firewire access.
The idea about multiple accounts is one of those "Duh!" moments. It makes even more sense on the laptop. But I'm going to do that on both machines. Not sure of the email separation, though. I can see the benefits, but I'd have to log into each user account to see each email account, right? Even with that, it might be better.
Thanks for the tips.
Ben

Similar Messages

I want to upgrade from OS X 10.5.8 to Snow Leopard. When trying to back-up to a WD 1 TB external drive, the back-up process stalls at about 4 GB. Grateful for any clues to assist with the backup issue please.

I want to upgrade from OS X 10.5.8 to Snow Leopard, then to Lion. When trying to back-up to a WD 1 TB external drive, the back-up process stalls at about 4 GB download. I would be very grateful for any clues to assist with the back-up process please.

That disk is very probably formated as FAT 32, the normal format for PCs. FAT 32 cannot support files larger than 4 GB; also, it corrupts some types of Mac OS files. If you want to securely backup your mac files, you must have a disk prepared for Mac OS.
Therefore, open Disk Utility, choose again 1 partition for your external disk and, under Options, GUID partition map (it may also be a boot disk for an intel mac), then format it as Mac OS Extended Journaled. Y0u are done.
If you want to exchange data with PCs, you should chose Master Boot REcord and NTFS format, for this you must use a additional utility like NTFS-3G. But note that mac files may also get corrupt in NTFS format.

OXS server 3 with mavericks, it will not load up the assistant with open directory and will not allow me to use old open directory it was not a clean install just upgrade. any help or advise appreciated as i really need the server.

OXS server 3 with mavericks, it will not load up the assistant with open directory and will not allow me to use old opeopen directory and will not allow me to use old open directory it was not a clean install just upgrade. any help or advise appreciated as i really need the server.

I wonder if the disk being referred to is actually your iPod which is not plugged in. Maybe something has stuck thinking the iPod should be there.
Try completely removing all the iTunes related programs according to this method.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1923
Restart you PC and see if startup improves.
If it doesn't improve you need to consider the possibility that there is something else going on.
If The problem goes away, hopefully a fresh install will be OK.

SRM Addon Upgrade Path with ERP2005 ( ERP 6.0 )

We are on the verge of finalising the implementation of SRM5.0. If we
go on SRM 5.0 add-on path then what is the next upgrade path that is
available with ERP 6.0. We have looked at SAP notes 963000 and 853651
which clearly say that "SRM as add-on is only supported in the release
combination ERP 6.0 and SRM 5.0 and other release combinations are not
supported. Also future SRM release will not run as add-on on ERP 6.0".
We have also looked at other SAP notes 863532, 982871, 1012010, 1012231
for the same issue.
Can we get more details on the upgrade path for SRM add-on that will be available in
future release with ERP 6.0.

Hi,
As you mentioned you have read in notes the SRM as an ADD-ON will no longer be supported by SAP, there are no plans for further and future integration of ERP and SRM directly, it is advisable to implement the SRM_SERVER on it's own and not as an add-on.
Regards,
Jason

Basic CMS with decent upgrade path

I am maintaining this website for a not-for-profit organisation (www.snjv.be) and currently it is running Drupal. However, upgrading can be a real hassle between major versions (I tried backing up the MySQL database from a Drupal 5 installation and re-importing it into a Drupal 6 install but no dice).
So I'm looking for a nice but not too complex CMS that provides decent upgrade paths. I'm no PHP or MySQL wizard, but I can get around with a bit of hacking (mainly PHP snippets).
If you need to know anything else, just ask.

.:B:. wrote:
MikeT wrote:
B wrote:Okay, I guess I should have mentioned: I don't like wordpress .
What puts you off Wordpress so much?
Mike
When I started setting stuff up, it had a bad reputation when it came to security. I don't know how that is now, but it's been in the news a few months ago - with a major security issue. So I'm not really comfortable with it.
That's a fair enough point and completely true even now. There is of course things like http://www.seoegghead.com/software/word … rewall.seo now but I won't try and convince you otherwise if you have a dislike of it!
Mike

Upgrading: Migration Assistant with FireWire or Time Machine Restore?

Hello,
I recently ordered a new Black Penryn MacBook to replace my 17" iMac. Would you recommend using the Migration Assistant with FireWire or a Time Machine restore in order to copy all of my data to the MacBook? I have the option to do both, but am unsure of which would be the best. Is the time machine restore more suited to restore a failed drive as opposed to facilitating a data transfer between two machines? Finally, regarding either of the transfer options, will there be any issues with keychain or application data that I should be aware of? Thanks for your help!

Those are two of the option presented by Migration Assistant. I think the end result will be the same. If I was doing it, I'd use the FireWire method, just because it's coming directly from the source instead of through a backup archive structure.

Upgrade from SCCM 2012 SP1 CU4 to R2 Fails - Unsupported Upgrade Path

Hi everybody,
I'm currently upgrading our SCCM infrastructure to SCCM 2012 R2 after have finished with the upgrade from SCCM 2012 RTM to SP1 CU4, thus far everything works fine, but when I try to update any
of the site servers, whether CAS or Primary, I'm getting the following error message in the Prerequisites Check:
I've gone through the system requirements and prerequisites over and over again and I can assure you that every possible update, supported OS, feature set, SQL Server, check list, etc,
etc, have been followed as per the official documentation available, however I'm stuck in this point, and surely enough I haven't been able to find out a similar case.Additionally I'm adding
the ConfigMgrPrereq log (the relevant portion of it) in case someone could kindly take a look at it.
<04-25-2014 02:06:46> ******* Start Prerequisite checking. *******
<04-25-2014 02:06:47> ********************************************
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFO: Detected current installed build version [7711] for sitecode [BRA]. For Upgrade,
minimum supported installed build version is [7804].
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;
Unsupported upgrade path;    Error;
Configuration Manager has detected that one or more sites in the hierarchy are installed with a version of Configuration Manager that is not supported for upgrade.
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFO: This rule only apply to primary site, skip checking.
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;
Active Replica MP;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFO: This rule only applies to primary or secondary site in hierarchy, skip checking.
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;
Parent site replication status;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> <<<RuleCategory: Database Upgrade Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking the target ConfigMgr database is ready to upgrade...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> ===== INFO: Prerequisite Type & Server: SQL:INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int
=====
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> <<<RuleCategory: Access Permissions>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking access permissions...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
SQL Server sysadmin rights;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;    SQL Server sysadmin rights
for reference site;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFO: CheckLocalSys is Admin of <INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int>.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Site server computer account administrative rights;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
SQL Server security mode;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: System Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking system requirements for ConfigMgr...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: OS version:601, ServicePack:1.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Target computer is a Windows server.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Unsupported site server operating system version for Setup;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Domain membership;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Pending system restart;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: Dependent Components>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking dependent components for ConfigMgr...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Return code:0, Major:10, Minor:50, BuildNum:4000
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
SQL Server version;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Get Sql edition:Enterprise Edition.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
SQL Server Edition;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Checking Tcp is enabled to Static port, SQL Server:INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int,
Instance:.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
SQL Server Tcp Port;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Checking if SQL Server memory is limited.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: SQL Server memory is limited.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Configuration for SQL Server memory usage;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Checking if SQL Server memory is configured to reserve minimum memory.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Installing the central administration site or primary site, requires SQL
Server to reserve a minimum of 8 gigabytes (GB) of memory.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> WARN: SQL Server minimum memory is 8000 MB.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;    SQL Server process memory allocation;
Warning;    Configuration Manager requires SQL Server to reserve a minimum of 8 gigabytes (GB) of memory for the central administration site and primary site and a minimum of 4 gigabytes (GB) for the secondary site. This memory is reserved by
using the Minimum server memory setting under Server Memory Options and is configured by using SQL Server Management Studio. For more information about how to set a fixed amount of memory, see
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/p/?LinkId=233759.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Case-insensitive collation on SQL Server;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Check Machine FQDN: <INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int>.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: getaddrinfo returned success.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Validate FQDN of SQL Server Computer;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO:CheckSupportedFQDNFormat <INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: NetBIOS <INFPROSCCMCDB>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;
Primary FQDN;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: Site Upgrade Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking if the target ConfigMgr site is ready to upgrade...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: Database Upgrade Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking the target ConfigMgr database is ready to upgrade...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> ===== INFO: Prerequisite Type & Server: SDK:INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int
=====
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: Access Permissions>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking access permissions...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: The rule 'Administrative rights on site system' has been run on server 'INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int',
skipped.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: System Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking system requirements for ConfigMgr...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: The rule 'Unsupported site server operating system version for Setup' has
been run on server 'INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int', skipped.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: The rule 'Domain membership' has been run on server 'INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int',
skipped.
<04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Windows Cluster not found on INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int.
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;
Windows Failover Cluster;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: The rule 'Pending system restart' has been run on server 'INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int',
skipped.
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<RuleCategory: Dependent Components>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking dependent components for ConfigMgr...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;
Windows Deployment Tools installed;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: CheckAdkWinPeInstalled on INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int.
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;    Windows Preinstallation Environment
installed;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;
SMS Provider machine has same domain as site server;    Passed
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<RuleCategory: Site Upgrade Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking if the target ConfigMgr site is ready to upgrade...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<RuleCategory: Database Upgrade Requirements>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking the target ConfigMgr database is ready to upgrade...>>>
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> ***************************************************
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> ******* Prerequisite checking is completed. *******
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> ******************************************<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: Updating
Prerequisite checking result into the registry
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: Connecting to INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int registry
<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: Setting registry values
If you wonder whether it might be related to this error:
-2014 02:07:00> INFO: Detected current installed build version [7711] for sitecode [BRA]. For Upgrade, minimum supported installed build version is [7804].
I confirm that this one site is a secondary one that's attached to a primary site and this log is from the CAS server, I managed to tall it and delete it from that site, but still appears listed
on the CAS management console, any idea how to force the removal of a secondary site that's attached to a primary from the CAS site when it has been removed already from said primary?
I've already tried the
Preinst /DELSITE XXX command but it only works when the site to remove it's attached to the local site and certainly not from a CAS
Finally, the version, build number and everything is correct, no idea what could be the problem, does anybody know a way to bypass this or force the re-evaluation of this rules, I've got
the impression that it's being cached somehow.
Any help would be highly appreciated,
Thank you.
Marcelo Estrada MCP-MCTS-MCITP-MCSA-MCSE

Hello again everybody,
I've finally managed to fix this up, in the end I had to delete those entries manually from the database as Garry suggested. After this was done the upgrade has gone through as expected with no further ado and has finalized already, now moving on to the
primary sites.
If anybody out there is facing the same issue, what I did was to delete those "stubborn" records executing the following statements over the CAS database:
DELETE
FROMServerDataWHERESiteCode='XXX'
DELETE
FROMSC_SiteDefinitionWHERESiteCode='XXX'
And this is pretty much about it. I'd recommend to take a proper backup first though as best practice.
Thank you all anyways for your answers and comments,
Marcelo Estrada MCP-MCTS-MCITP-MCSA-MCSE

Error Message: "This upgrade path is not supported"

Scenario
During the process of upgrade to Windows 10 Technical Preview, we may encounter the error “This upgrade path is not supported. Please close Setup and re-launch from the root of the media or go back and pick a different installation
choice.” in the Compatibility report.
Analysis
Step 1: Perform the scenario 1: the upgrade installation fails.
Reproduce this error following the steps below:
Download the Windows 10 Technical Preview ISO installation file.
Extract the ISO installation file to C:\New folder, and now the location of the installation file is
C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\.
Click setup.exe from the installation file, and then click
Install now.
Setup is starting, and then get two options Upgrade and
Custom which is the classic setup wizard which we can see during booting from DVD.
Click Upgrade to run upgrade installation, however, the error occurs.
It seems that it is impossible to perform upgrade installation to Windows 10 Technical Preview, although it is fine to click
Custom to perform clean installation which cannot keep the personal setting and applications.
However, what we want is upgrade installation, not clean installation.
Step 2: Perform the scenario 2: the upgrade installation works fine.
If extract the ISO installation to C:\New in the above step2, click the
setup.exe from the installation file C:\New\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\, the upgrade installation would work fine, which is as shown the following two figures:
Step 3: Check the setupact.log
file which contains information about setup actions during the installation of the two scenarios.
Scenario 1: Check the setupact.log file of the scenario 1. The detailed information is shown as below:
2014-10-14 19:03:40, Info UI Determining whether we should run ConX or legacy setup
2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Will launch ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Launching ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Launching C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI Unknown command line for ConX setup experience. Launching legacy setup experience.
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI Determining if we are in WDS/Unattend mode
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI No need to hide autorun
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info [0x0a000a] UI Autorun:Autorun core successfully initialized!!!
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info [0x0a000b] UI Autorun:Autorun UI successfully initialized!!!
2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI AppWindow has layout style 0
2014-10-14 19:03:45, Info UI NavWindow has layout style 0
2014-10-14 19:03:45, Info [0x0a011c] UI WizardDialogPost::SetActive
2014-10-14 19:04:57, Info [0x0a018e] UI Passing command line parameter ("C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\setup.exe /HideWelcome /uilanguage:en-US /targetlanguage:en-US") to IBS.
Scenario 2: Check the setupact.log file of the scenario 2. The detailed information is shown as below:
2014-10-14 19:08:04, Info UI Determining whether we should run ConX or legacy setup
2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Will launch ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Launching ConX setup experience
2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Launching C:\New\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe
According to the two logs, we can get the following points:
In scenario 1, it would invoke the SetupPrep.exe in the source folder directly to perform an installation preparation. However, it failed to recognize the path
C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe. Then it would launch legacy setup.
In the scenario 2, Windows setup would be redirected to the ConX setup to perform upgrade installation automatically.
So, what is the difference of the scenario 1 and 2 to bring the different results of upgrade installation?
Workaround
Based on lots of testing, we find that if there is no space in the extracting location of the ISO installation
file, the upgrade installation would work fine.
What’s more, we can get the meaning of the two setup models in the setupact.log:
Legacy setup: it is same with setup from DVD boot.
ConX setup: it would check the compatibility and language UI for upgrade preparation, then perform migration and upgrade directly.
Additional Resource
From the release of Windows 10 Technical Preview, many users have installed and tested Windows 10 Technical Preview, we still hope more and more users would download and install Windows 10 Technical Preview for test, and provide
us your feedback.
Download Windows Technical Preview
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/preview-iso
Download Windows Technical Preview for Enterprise
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/evaluate-windows-technical-preview-for-enterprise
Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Hello,
I would guess that existence of a space in the folder name is what the issue is. Try removing the space from the folder name and see if works. New_Folder for example
Thanks, Darrell Gorter [MSFT] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

I am trying to upgrade EPM 8.9(8.49.23) to EPM 9.1 (8.53.08). During dataconversion step the AE process finished succssfully in few seconds. When i see the log it says "There are no conversions to run for upgrade path PF89 (18028,10003)". Please let me kn

I am trying to upgrade EPM 8.9(8.49.23) to EPM 9.1 (8.53.08). During dataconversion step the AE process finished succssfully in few seconds. When i see the log it says "There are no conversions to run for upgrade path PF89 (18028,10003)". Please let me know why it didnt do any conversion. Am i missing something?

yes, that app engine didnt inserted any rows. So now when i tried to drill down i found that there was no data in the "new demo" database on table UPG_DATACONV. That is the reason for all this.
When i applied required for upgrade patch in demo it said couple of patch already exists so those update i skipped. Now when i check upd877654 has a step which imports the data in this table. my change assistant told that the update is already available in my demo so i skipped. Now i am not sure what to do.
I tried reimporting the data and running the analyzer again. But worried that there can be any issues due to this.

Windows 8.1, Update 1 upgrade path

Hi, if there is anyone of any influence who might read this, please, please, for you own sakes make an upgrade path directly from Windows 8.0 --> Windows 8.1, Update 1
I cannot upgrade from W8.0 --> 8.1.
I cannot upgrade due the the following error. But I believe it is a silly error and can be overcome as some have managed:
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20131018074442AAswJqp
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-windows_install/windows-81-install-unable-to-create-ramdisk/887b5adc-86ce-4c37-9c58-72eca5f712d4?page=8&tm=1396807793681
I even had a MS 3rd line Andswer Desk (ref:1233447567.) guy who was remote controlling my machine trying clean boot give up after saying that if my
MB manufacturer wont support drivers past Vista then there is nothing they "should" do... But Vista is EoS but not extended support as XP is, that ends 2017:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/lifecycle
This is an issue I'm having with my personal PC but I also work in IT infrastructure and I think this needs to be sorted. This is going to become a BIG issue for many other people who have Vista/XP-grade systems with the requirements for 8.1.1 who will try
to upgrade.
Please can someone help?
System: Q6600, MB: XFX Nvidia Nforce 680i LT, 8GB RAM

Hi,
Windows 8.1 do have have higher requirements for hardware, If your computer hardeware device was too old, you may encounter some problem during install or using Windows 8.1.
Roger Lu
TechNet Community Support

Need help with upgrade from Adobe Creative Suite to PS CS4

My old laptop with Photoshop on it crashed and I ended up purchasing a new laptop.
I'm trying to reload my PS CS4. I am using an upgrade from an educational Adobe Creative Suite Premium to the CS4 and when I loaded it on my old laptop I had to get installation help through customer service, but now customer service will not help me since it is CS4.
When installing the upgrade, it tell me to select the product I already own. I own the educational full creative suite, but am only upgrading the Photoshop. I chose Photoshop CS and tried entering the serial number for the suite. It tells me that the serial number doesn't match the product chosen. Of course the only products I'm allowed to choose from is Photoshop CS, CS2, or CS3 and not Creative Suite Premium.
The other serial numbers on this CS is Golive CO and Pagemaker Plug-in.
I was told there are Adobe customer service reps here on the forum, please tell me what it was I need to do to get my Photoshop installed.
Thanks

i wasn't aware that you could get a ps4 at an upgrade price using an older creative suite produect. i searched online and found this thread (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/476009) which makes it appear that was not a valid upgrade path.
but, if you're confident that was a valid upgrade path, i'm pretty sure something will need to be done on adobe's end and no amount of manipulation, on your end only, will work.
your best bet would be to get help in this forum from an adobe staff member like jeff wright who is very knowledgeable and goes out of his way to help adobe customers. to that end, if i were you, i would start a new thread mentioning his name in your title and in your initial post explaining:
you have the educational Adobe Creative Suite Premium and purchased a photoshop cs4 upgrade years ago that required adobe support help to install years ago.
that worked well until a recent computer problem forced you buy a new laptop and you are now trying to reinstall that ps cs4 and again need support help but have been refused help because cs4 is not current.

Save As Script with predefined path and file name

Hello,
Livecycle version: 8.2.1.4029.1.523496
The aim of the script I have is to save the livecycle form to a predefined directory and using the values of a text field in the file name.
The script is placed in an exit event on a field using javascript as follows:
this.saveAs("/c/forms/Template/Leave Application " + Applicants_Name.rawValue".pdf");
The script does not work.
Can any one please provide some assistance with correcting my script?
Any help will be most appreciated.

This solution is misleading....
Of course this works only if you plan to load Trusted script on each machine you plan to use that form. In other words you can not rollout form to entire organization with out loading trusted function in each targeted machine.
Also there are other limitations... like if for some reason user reinstalls Acrobat x or Reader x or upgrade to latest version they need to remember to redeploy the trusted function to the required location.

Merom / Conroe upgrade path for Intel iMac?

Has anything been released about a processor upgrade path (if possible) to take the Early 2006 IiMacs from the Yonah CPU family to Merom or Conroe?
I'm still steamed to be stuck with a 32-bit CPU (even though it is a good one, funny how that fact is still judiciously left out of all promotional materials) and wondered if I will be left high and dry in 2-3 months when the 64-bit Core 2 Duo chips ship.
It would be nice if there were an upgrade path to bring the early adopter faithful into the 64-bit realm. Anyone heard a mighty rumblin' ?

People have successfully removed the CPU and replaced it. And, the new chips are supposed to be compatible with any Yonah based system.
So, while there is no official upgrade path, it should not be a problem installing a new CPU in the machine later.
Obviously, the heat of the new chips will be a consideration. They may be hotter, they may not be.
And, it will obviously void your warranty.
But, it should be possible.

Why does Illustrator CS4 save pdfs with clipping paths and make rasters of gradient areas

I am on a IMAC and upgraded to 10.6.8 Jan 2014. I am using CS4 Illustrator to create with. When i save my work as a pdf then reopen the pdf in Ill to make changes, the whole page has:
A.) Multiple clipping paths around it
B.) Most text has now become outlined. Not editable anymore.
C.) Gradient areas have multiple clipping paths of the single gradient area
D.) The gradient areas now become rasterized.
This is very frustrating as now all of my marketing files, some 300+, are worthless. I don't know where to look anymore to find the problem.
Please help.
Thank you very much

John,
I have the presets as you have shown. I had been editing the supplied items as you suggested. Then figured i should ask the questions of those who are better than I.
But still a bit confused as to why the new save places clipping paths around the document.
Thank you John and Monika for your help.
why does Illustrator CS4 save pdfs with clipping paths and make rasters of gradient areas
created by John Mensinger in Illustrator - View the full discussion
I do a save as "pdf" in the format pull down tab. I save to a folder on the hard drive. Where is the "Illustrator editability" check box? I presumed it is in Acrobat some where
but i seem to be lost.
It is in Illustrator's Save Adobe PDF dialog, which pops up before the saved file is written.
https://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/downloadImage/2-6439399-644928/450-397/Untitl ed-1.jpg
Sorry i didn't mention this, but this seems to have occurred when using images and text from provided pdfs.
That's a critical fact. If you didn't do the original save, the above is moot, and it's too late to exercise any control over the save process. Someone else failed to save for editability. The only thing you can do is clean up/repair the content, (release clipping masks, rebuild rasterized elements, expand objects, etc.), and save correctly as AI. Then, if necessary, re-save as PDF with the correct settings.
Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at https://forums.adobe.com/message/6439399#6439399
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page:
To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at . In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
Start a new discussion in Illustrator by email or at Adobe Community
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/thread/416458?tstart=0.

Upgrade path

we are upgrading from ACS 2.6 to 4.1
should we order the upgrade software (CSACS-4.1-WINUP-K9) or should we order the regular package (CSACS-4.1-WIN-K9)since 2.6 is so out of date?

Hi Martin,
I agree with Scott (no surprise!) One of my co-workers just went down the upgrade path (albeit from a more recent version) and it was very messy. I'm pretty sure he finally just ditched the whole plan and started fresh.
Hope this helps!
Rob

Assistance with upgrade paths?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for