Associate Inspection Lot to existing QM Notification
Hi QM's,
Can I link an IInspection Lot created with inspection lot origin = 08 stock transfer to a QM Notification that already exist and that is already assigned to another inspection lot?
The issue is that QM Notification is created for a Material / Serial Number, bbu t if that Material / Serial Number is defective we need to change it what is the best practice to do this?
Thanks.
Regards,
BMO.
Dear Burno
Linking an inspection with an existing notification is not possible.
But what can you do is create another notification for this. There is a funcationality in notification called as Related notification wherein you will get to know if there was a notification generation for this material before and it will also give you the inspection lot and all the details.
Regards
Gajesh
Similar Messages
-
QM - linking newly created Inspection Lot to an existing Notification
We have a business requirement to link a newly created inspection lot to an existing Quality notification. When defects are recorded in the Inspection Lot, the linked quality notification should be used as opposed to creation of a new notification.
I am able to create the document flow to point the existing notification to Inspection Lot. In essence when the user displays the notification using QM02/QM03 and goes to document flow the newly created inspection lot gets displayed.
Has anyone encountered similar business requirement? Any inputs will be very much appreciated.
Thanks!
Edited by: Sridhar Adurti on Aug 4, 2010 11:03 PMDear Burno
Linking an inspection with an existing notification is not possible.
But what can you do is create another notification for this. There is a funcationality in notification called as Related notification wherein you will get to know if there was a notification generation for this material before and it will also give you the inspection lot and all the details.
Regards
Gajesh -
655 Movement: No Inspection lot created.
Dear Expert's,
My End user are doing 655 for a Return delivery, In Material Master "05", inspection type is Set, but it is not active.
No inspection Lot has been Generated , but in MMBE , the Stock is in Quality.
1) Now, how can i do result recording for the same .
2) Even though "05", is not active how did it allow to do 655 Movt.
<<Text removed>>
Edited by: Matt on Jul 6, 2011 2:42 PMHi Sandy,
Getting stock posted to quality inspection without inspection lot generation is possible in standard SAP. Firstly I try to explain why this happens.
1. Go to material master in QM view
2. You must have ticked on u201CPost to inspection stocku201D tick
3. And you have not activated 05 inspection type.
As a result of which, system is posting the stock to quality inspection without generating lot. For this case you need to carry out 321 movement through MB1B transaction for transferring stock from quality to unrestricted.
1. Regarding your first question, that how you can carry out result recording.
a) In order to carry out result recording inspection lot must exist. And for that inspection type 05 must be activated in material master.
b) You must have valid inspection plan with appropriate usage also.
c) Inspection type activation has no co-relation 655 movement. Movement typeu2019s customization is associated with delivery type.
d) Hence it doesnu2019t matter whether you have activated or deactivated 05 inspection type in material master.
e) Inspection type activation is useful only for lot generation.
2. Regarding second question that how you can carry out 655 movement
a) This is automated movement with respect to outbound delivery and generally done through VL02N and not in VA01.
b) I donu2019t think this movement is possible through MIGO. Better if you consult with good SD consultant.
Regards,
Anand Rao -
Dear Experts,
I have created a scenario for Early lot creation for GR against process order. Means when I release the process order, immediately GR lot is generated. Now when I actually do the GR, the system should consider the same lot. But in my case the system is generating one more inspection lot. Can you please help me, why this is happening.
Thanks & regards
MilindHi Milind,
Check whether you have posted a different batch to warehouse or you have made a GR posting to a different storage location. In such cases a new lot will be generated for 04 inspection although an early inspection lot already exists.
Please check and revert.
Regards,
Swati -
Inspection Lot + Notification List
Hi there,
I'm a "superuser" in a company that is trying to create a useful "vendor quality list".
It's quite annoying that the inspection lots and notification are so separated as they are today.
In QA33 you can get the inspection lots precision (for example 95 % approved inspection lots)
In different QM1X you can get notification info regarding header, defects and cause.
But where is the complete list - without exporting data to excel and spend time there..??
I have tried to connect tables in SQVI but it doesn't work completely.
I want a list showing:
Vendor - Material - Batch No - inspection lot - UD Decision - UD Date - Notification No (if any) - Notification Header (if any) - Defect (if any) - Cause (if any)
Any suggestions anyone? This cannot be a unique requirement for my company.
Greatful for any help.Thanks SujitSND and Rene for your answers!
Rene, i have connected inspection lot with Notification Header without problem, but the problem starts when you continue to connect Defects (QMFE) and Cause (QMUR) tables as well.
Instantly when you connect QMFE you cannot "lefter outer join" and you cannot see the approved inspection lots without any notification connection (only shows 124 and 125 in example below).
I want my SQVI list to show me the following:
Insp lot 123 - UD approved
Insp lot 124 - UD rejected - Notification 234 - Notification header - Defect 12 - Cause 13
Insp lot 125 - UD rejected - Notification 235 - Notification header - Defect 13 - Cause 13
Insp lot 126 - UD approved
Insp lot 127 - UD approved
If you have the correct sollution for this issue i am very interesting to hear it! -
Multiple notification against single inspection lot (03 inspection type)
Dear friends
While recording the defects multiple times against single inspection lot (03type) , all the defects are added in single notification, but my client requirement is they want different notification. if any body knows please tell me.
Note : in inspection type there is a option of multiple notification against single inspection lot, but this is
not working (i think it will work only serial number,equipment and functional location get changed)
Please do the needful
RegardsHi Karthikeyan
As you mentioned it is not possible to create notification other than based on the object types.
A work out can be make an action box in the notification for creating another notification with the help of ABAP ( call transaction QM01) and while doing this the entire datas of the inspection lot gets copied into the notification. you may have to use a user exit also.
Defect can be recorded in the item level by the user.
Sounds difficult but certainly possible
Regards
gajesh -
Bapi to create quality notification with inspection lot and defects of char
Hello experts,
Can any body tell me how to create notification using inspection lot.
regards
Narendranath ReddyHi Narendranath,
Have you tried BAPI_QNOTIFICAT_CREATE? Based on inspection lot data, you should have the data you need to create a quality notification.
Good luck.
Best regards,
Guus
Edited by: Guus Jansen on Feb 2, 2011 10:05 AM -
Multiple notifications for an Inspection lot
Hello
I would like to create one notification by defect keyed for an inspection lot .
If I work with serial numbers I can create one notification by defect
If I don't use serial numbers , all defects are linked to a single notification even though I remove the tick for "One notification by Inspection lot " in the Inspection lot category customizing ?
I would like to know if there is a way to do that.
Thanks for your help
Regards
RegisIt seems this link has got some useful replies:
Multiple notification creation for defects recorded during UD
Also other similar discussion:
Multiple notification against single inspection lot (03 inspection type) -
Inspection lot generation notification
Hi All,
when an inspection lot is genertated upon good receipt is ther anyway were i can create a notification to the concerned user for inspecting the lot.secondly if ihave 50 inspection lots generated in a day dou have any option through which i can assign the ispection lots to the concerned users or Quality inspectors.
Suggestion willbe worth appreatation.Hello
1) Alert Management is an SAP function. You will need an ABAPer to develop this functionality. You can either specify that alert should trigger to these many people or it can be particular role based so that alert to goes only to those persons who has those roles.
please check this link for information on
Link: [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/EN/42/ed08baf3401a61e10000000a422035/content.htm]
Link: [http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/60c24b82-6da9-2a10-5a93-f1f729d89787&overridelayout=true]
2) What you mean assigning inspection lot to an inspector? What is the exact requirment ? Normaly who is doing the result recording is taken as the inspector. If you use inspection point you can record who was the inspector
Regards
Gajesh -
Quality Notification and Inspection Lots
Hello everyone:
Does anyone have an SAP environment in which the quality notifications are generated automatically followed by inspection lot creation? In these instances please explain how you manage to assign the quality notifications to the related inspection lots.
I am working on a project to create quality notifications at the time of receipt into quality inspection stock then inspection lot creation/results recording and subsequent automatic closure of quality notifications.
Appreciate your feedback.
Thank you.Genrally it's not the way it operates, but I can understand the way business forces their requirements on SAP team. The way you have given the requirements, it can done but everything has to be done through development. I never come across this type of requirement but you can check the following stuff.
1. As per SAP, once the material is received (any case Ware houes managed/ or simple IM) based on the master data set up system creates inspection lot and put the quality into stock. So, If you want to create q -note prior to inspection lot creation either it should be manual or independant of goods receipt. I suggest, find a user exit which fires at the time of GR (just before insp.lot gets created) and create the q-note based on the information from the p.o. There standard sap BAPI's available, so no complex developmen is required. Just need to find the correct user exit and timing of creating q-notes. What minmum required fields for your q-note? Do you want any defects info to be passed on to q-note from the data you maintain in MIC? You need see all these things before you go with creating prior q-note.
2. The biggest challenge will be mtaching the q-notes created in advance to the defects/out of spec. recorded during result.recording. Again if you have a smart developer, I think it is possible. Find out the user exit/ or any BADI which can be used when the results are out of spec., turn on standard settings of SAP to create a defect record but while q-note is generated(standard sap functionality) for defect - force your logic to find out the corresponding q-note which was already created and update it with defect info. You can explore passing p.o/item number as refe. no to q-note when it was created and same can be used in add. to your Material/plant/serial no if required.
I am sure, it's a challenging one and not the normal way we do in sap, but you have to go for it if business insists. In general its not the way I have seen, may be other experts might have come across.
Hope it helps.
Thanks,
Ram -
Assign the inspection lot to notification
HI Gurus,
I want to assign a inspection lot to a notification. how can i assign inspection lot?
Regards,
SBabuDear Babu,
If you assign specific notification type in notification configurations, then while doing RR if the defect is located the system will automatically prompt you for Notification.
If you find the defect later on production line then against the inspection lot you can raise manual notification referring that LOT.
Best Regards,
Shekhar -
Dear Friends ,
I want to delete stock of material from aplant.The material is in QC & inspection type 01 is present.But there is no inspection lot for the material in QA32 tr.The material canbe viewed in MMBE.I want to knock off the stock completely through movt. type 562.It is showing the message as Material is in quality inspection.Pls suggest.Hi,
Pl. check in your material master whether the inspection type 01 is active & whether the Post to inspection stock tick is marked at purchasing view. If it is not active then the situation you described may arise. If you have selected Post to inspection stock option at PO (though not mentioned in material master) for the material, then material is placed in QI atock after receipt, but no inspection lot is created. Then you can post the inspection stock to unrestricted stock by selecting movement type 321 in transaction MB1B. From there you can knock off the stock.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Prashant -
One inspection lot for multiple materials of purchase order line items
Hi All,
My client requirement is one inspection lot for multiple materials of purchase order line items.
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks in advance for early reply.
Regards,
JishuI totally agree with Amol.
I don't think I would touch that development nor would I ever tell a client it could reliably be done through development.
Knowing what I know about the table structures, I don't think you could create any development for this that could use a significant amount of the existing tables and functionality. I think you'd have to create all your own Z tables and basically rebuild the functionality. Tying it back in with SAP data will be difficult.
You're even looking at all custom screens for your results recording and UD as well. And if you have follow-on functions like batch classification requirements, batch determination, COA publication, results copy functions, use of DMR and sampling procedures, physical samples, quality notifications, etc. etc.. you could be looking a whole lot of development.
Craig -
Inspection lot number ranges skipping
My inspection lot number ranges are skipping, those are std number ranges like 01 origin, 04 origin etc, what could be the reason for that.
Inspn lots are getting generated and I took UD also. But certain numbers in the range got skipped.
Eg:- Incoming inspn lot 010000000041 then it comes 010000000045
Lot numbers 01/42, 01/43, 01/44 does not exist in sytem.
Please suggest a way out
Thanks
Vineeth
Edited by: vineeth varghese on Jul 18, 2008 11:31 AMCraig,
But expert suggestion says, not to switch off buffer thru SNRO as it may affect fuctionality as you said early in this discussion.
But I believe, this is to be relooked by SAP as number range skipping is not good (My case its skipping 5-7 numbers at a time). But I am not convinced with the reply from SAP also.
Anyway thanks to you craig for your advice.
SAP Note on this matter for reference of all. Thanks
================================
Note: 62077
Summary
Symptom
Gaps (jumps) occur when allocating internal numbers.
The status of the number range interval does not match the number that was last assigned.
The number assignment does not reflect the insert sequence.
IMPORTANT: Read Notes 504875 and 678501.
Other terms
Document number, number range, number range object, buffering, current number level, trip number assignment, number interval, CO document, CO actual posting, inspection lot, material document, physical inventory document, production order number, planned order number, process order number, maintenance order number
FB01, VF01, KO88, KE21, KE11, FD01, FK01, XK01, XDN1, MB01, MB0A, MB11, MB1A, MB1B, MB1C, MB31, KANK, KB11, KB13, KB14, KB41, KB43, KB44, KB21, KB23, KB24, KB31, KB33, KB34, KB51, KB53, KB54, PR01, PR02, PR03, PR04, PR05, XD01, VD01, MK01, SNUM, SM56, SNRO, VL01, VL02, CO01, CO40, CO41, VA01, MR1M, MIRO
Reason and Prerequisites
A large number of number range objects are buffered. When the system buffers a number range object, it does not update numbers individually in the database but reserves a preset group of numbers (depending on the number range object) in the database the first time a number is requested, and makes these numbers available to the application server in question. The following numbers can then be taken directly from the application server buffer. New numbers are not used in the database until the application server buffer has been used up.
The effects described under "Symptom" are a direct consequence of this:
If an application server is shut down, the numbers that are left in the buffer (that is, that are not yet assigned) are lost. As a result, there are gaps in the number assignment.
The status of the number range interval reflects the next free number that has not yet been transferred to an application server for intermediate buffering. The current number level therefore does not display the number of the "next" object.
The current number level (for each server) can be displayed using Transaction SM56. Call transaction SM56 and choose the menu 'Goto' -> 'Entries'. In the dialog box, enter the client, the affected number range object (for example, RK_BELEG) and possibly the required subobject (corresponds to the controlling area for the object RK_BELEG).
If you use several application servers, the numerical sequence will not reflect the (chronological) insert sequence because the numbers are buffered separately on the individual hosts.
Buffering the number range objects has a positive effect on performance, because the system no longer has to access the database (number range table NRIV) for each posting. Furthermore, a serialization of this table (database locking) is prevented to a large extent so that posting procedures can be carried out in parallel.
Solution
Since number range buffering does not cause any expressly assured qualities to be lost, no correction is required.
If you still require continuous allocation, you can deactivate the number range buffering specifically for individual objects.
Proceed as follows:
- Start Transaction SNRO and enter the affected object.
- Choose 'Change'.
- Deactivate buffering: Choose 'Edit' -> 'Set Up Buffering' -> 'No Buffering'.
- If you want to change the buffer size only, enter the corresponding value in the field 'No. of numbers in buffer'.
- Save the changes.
Please note that this change is a modification. The modification is overwritten as soon as the affected number range object is redelivered - in other words, you must check the change manually each time you import a release.
In particular, read Note 678501, bearing in mind that changing the buffering type - if not explicitly recommended by SAP - constitutes a modification. For other possible solutions, refer to the following notes:
179224, 599157 and 840901.
For the the following number range objects, gaps may cause users to have doubts since they are 'expecting' a sequential numbering:
Area CO:
- RK_BELEG (CO Document)
CAUTION: Note that the problems described in Notes 20965 and 29030 may occur if you deactivate buffering.
- COPA_IST (Document number in actual posting)
- COPA_PLAN (Document number in planned posting)
- COPA_OBJ (Profitability segment number)
Area FI:
- DEBITOR (Customer master data)
- KREDITOR (Vendor master data)
Area HR:
- RP_REINR (Trip numbers)
Area PM, PP, PS
- AUFTRAG (Order number, production, process, maintenance order, network number)
- QMEL_NR (Number range - message)
Area MM:
- MATBELEG (Material documents)
- MATERIALNR (Material master)
Area QM:
- QLOSE (Inspection lots in QM)
- QMEL_NR (Number range - message)
- QMERK (Confirmation number)
- QMERKMALE (Master inspection characteristics in QSS)
- QMERKRUECK (Confirmation number of an inspection characteristic in QM results processing)
- QMETHODEN (Inspection methods in QM)
- ROUTING_Q (Number ranges for inspection plans)
- QCONTROLCH (Quality control chart)
Area Workflow:
- EDIDOC (IDocs)
Number range buffering can be activated or deactivated at any time.
Number range objects that have to be continuous due to legal specifications (for example, RF_BELEG, RV_BELEG), or due to a corresponding application logic must not be buffered using the buffering type 'Main memory buffering'. See also Notes 37844 (for RF_BELEG) and 23835 (for RV_BELEG).
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 10.07.2007 12:57:00
Priority: Recommendations/additional info
Category: Consulting
Primary Component: BC-SRV-NUM Number Range Management
Secondary Components: CA-GTF General Application Functions
BC-SRV-ASF-UOM Unit Management
CO Controlling
CO-OM-CCA Cost Center Accounting
CO-OM-CCA-A Master Data
CO-PA Profitability Analysis
FI Financial Accounting
FI-AP Accounts Payable
FI-AR Accounts Receivable
FI-GL General Ledger Accounting
FI-TV Business Trip Management
LO-MD-MM Material Master
MM Materials Management
MM-IM Inventory Management
MM-IM-PI Physical Inventory
PM Plant Maintenance
PP Production Planning and Control
QM Quality Management
QM-PT Quality Planning
QM-QN Quality Notifications
Edited by: viny on Jul 23, 2008 9:18 AM -
Error in Setup Tables for QM Inspection Lots
Hi,
I have an issue when I attempt to fill the setup tables for QM that I receive the following error for the Inspection Lots (QV) only. When I fill the setup tables for Notifications and Inspection Results, then these are OK and use the same standard function module 'qmex_inspection_lot_import_ini'.
"Internal error in program SAPLQMEX, function module / subroutine qmex_inspection_lot_import_ini, code 1".
Has anyone any ideas of the cause or have you experienced this before?
Thanks,
ScottHi,
The most likely reason that leads to the above error message in your
system is an inconsistency of the inspection lots.
To get the inconsistent inspection lot,please check your system in the
following way:
- transaction OLIQBW for running Setup table
- switch on debugging mode
- set break point in the function QMEX_INSPECTION_LOT_IMPORT_INI
on the line:
ELSE.
MESSAGE e011(qmex) WITH sy-repid
'qmex_inspection_lot_import_ini'
'1'.
> then excecute F8 to go to this break point.
- double klick on ' l_qals-prueflos'
on line 77 in the same function QMEX_INSPECTION_LOT_IMPORT_INI:
READ TABLE qave_tab INTO l_qave
WITH KEY prueflos = l_qals-prueflos < here !
BINARY SEARCH.
Please check following note:
305244 Missing operations for the inspection lot
89541 Inspection lot exists w/o status object: EM BS001
536769 Inspection lots without status object
Thanks,
Venkat
Maybe you are looking for
-
I am about to buy an ipad mini for my daughter, with wifi only capability & wondered if I was able to share my internet connection via my personal hotspot on this device. I know that you can on an ipad with wifi + cellular device, but wondered how it
-
How to improve performance by pulling data instead of BSEG table?
Hi, We are facing issue in which we have to pull material no for some non copa postings. But if we use BSEG table then serious performance issues are coming up.. so are there any other tables / combination of tables that we can look for instead of BS
-
I created an addon which overlay commonDialog.xul. In the load event, window.resizeTo is called and set to a very small size (like 10x10) so it is almost invisible to users. This works fine in FF 15. After upgrading to FF 17 or FF 18, this stops work
-
Why Firefox 4 automaticaly zoom in, when I open something on new tab?
I have windows 7 and newest version of firefox 4. Everytime, when I open som link in new tab, firefox automatically zoom-in. I have to keep using zoom-out with my mouse scroll and it is quite annoying. I havent got any zoom problems with firefox 3.
-
Braodband slow stuck at 0.25 ip profile
My broadband has not been working properly for coming on a month now. first my phone staretd crackling which kept making my homehub flash orange. This problem appears to be fixed according to BT, I used my test socket and evreything was fine, changed