Assurion Insurance is not secure

To all on the fence about buying Assurion insurance for their devices, I am telling you not to do it.
     My fiancé, whose phone is on my account, had her 4s deactivated by Assurion last Saturday. When I called Verizon Customer Service (who was very nice) they told me that Assurion had done this because a claim had been filed on her phone saying it was lost/stolen.  Neither of us filed a claim.  It was fraudulent.  Assurion told me that they would open a Fraud report and take action. meanwhile, they couldn't reactivate her phone for 24-48 hours because of the investigation.
     The Verizon rep who was helping me was very good at keeping in touch with me.  He called me back when he said he would and did everything that was asked of him.
     After the phone was reactivated I called Assurion to find out the whole story on why the phone was deactivated.  I was told that in January a claim was filed saying that the phone was lost.  Then in late February another claim was filed saying the original replacement phone was never received. That's when our phone was shut off. The claims were filed online by the person.  I asked what information was given to Assurion online to convince them that the person filing the claim was me.  I was told by their rep that all they needed to do when filing an online claim was to provide my name, my address, and the phone number.  At that time they can have it shipped to another address, and another name.  I was astonished by this. There is no security to prove that the person filing the claim was actually the person who owns the phone. I questioned and requestioned this and was told this multiple times.  Now she did tell me that if a person calls in and files the claim over the phone then they need to provide additional information.  But in my case this did not apply as the claims were filed online.
     Also, they will not tell me anything about their investigation.  I just have to assume that they will go after the person who is filing the claims. I am not sure that this will actually happen though.  They don't seem to care about security, so why would they follow up on this.
     I have since cancelled my Assurion contracts for both my phones.  They told me that there is nothing that they can do in the future to prevent this person from fling another claim and getting another phone sent to them as long as they do it online, so I cancelled the insurance.
     Why would I continue to pay them $19.98 a month(for both phones) when they will let ANYONE file a claim with no security measures taken.  I will put my money in a jar instead, and if I break or lose it, I will just buy one on the secondary market. 
     As I have already said, Verizon Customer service was great to me in this whole affair, but I question why they would continue to do business with a company who does not care about the security of their customers.

Maybe because Assurion the only company that has this kind of insurance. At&t, T-Mobile and Sprint all use Assurion.

Similar Messages

  • Buyer Beware: Insurance may not be worth it. Verizon doesn't honor loyalty. I report, you decide.

    Asurion Insurance may not be worth it, and Verizon doesn't stand by it's loyal customers. 
    I've had a Motorola Droid (Original) for 2 years, and my contract just ended this month (March 2012).  My Droid's screen no longer accepts my touches.  After several reboots, battery removals, resets etc, the phone still won't recognized screen touches.  The Verizon rep at the store didn't know how to deal with it either.  "Sorry dude." was the reply.
    We went over options of getting a new phone like the iPhone 4s or Droid Maxx etc, or doing an insurance claim. (I'm waiting a few months to see if the iPhone 5 is going to be worth another 2 year stretch). I was informed by the rep in the store and a rep on the phone that I would have to pay a deductible of $89 if I wanted to go that route.  So here's where I have an issue.  If I've had a phone for two years that by this time is obsolete, no longer sold and the model is worth a fraction of its original value, and if I've paid 6.99/mo for 24 months ($167.76), does it make sense for me to pay an additional $89.00 (= total of $256.76) deductible for a rehab'd old Droid?  Which is what was explained to me I may get.  "We have no control over the phone you receive". (new or refurbished)  So for me it's definitely not woth it.
    I tried explaining this to the Verizon rep in the store and on the phone and they weren't sympathetic or possessed business savvy enough (or had the permission).  I was referred to Asurion, (as expected) and the Asurion rep jumped the price of the deductible up to $99.00.  The Verizon phone rep, and the Asurion phone rep both repeated to me several times "according to the contract that YOU agreed on, we will charge you $89.00/$99.00..."  The Verizon rep dumped me off on Asurion saying it's their insurance contract so I'd have to deal with them, since I didn't want to pay the deductible. The Asurion rep was just as "pass the buck" with "it's a contract you agreed to with Verizon not us," mentality.   Right away I called back to Verizon to get rid of my $6.99 insurance and they deleted it off my account. 
    Even when I informed them that I'm no longer under contract (I was even nice about it) and can go anywhere else the reply was "that's your decision."  Too bad for Verizon that they don't stand by their customers. Too bad for Verizon wireless their attitude is "if you want to leave, don't let the door hit you on the way out." I can tell this was something the reps are trained to say and say it often; their responses were automatic, sounded rehearsed and robotic. 
    I've been with Verizon for over 4 years (at least) so this attitude is a bit of stab in the back.  It's not good Verizon chose not to honor loyalty and stick by a customer who has completed at least two contracts.  Good news is, in this competitive environment, I can go anywhere for a phone, and service. 
    I can understand if you just bought a phone that's normally $500.00 retail (no contract) and it went bad.  Paying an $89-$99 insurance deductible is possibly reasonable depending on the circumstances, but not in my situation nor in other loyal customer situations in similar situation. 
    My take on it is;  find out about the manufacturer's warranty on a phone first before buying a phone.  The amount you'd pay for monthly insurance and deductible costs may not be worth it.  You may be better off having the manufacturer replace the phone, or just buying a new phone anyway.  Again...depending on your circumstances. 
    Good news is, I'm no longer under contract and looking around.  My girlfriend is with Sprint and they've replaced two defective phones with NO CHARGE at all.  Looks like I'll be looking at Sprint's website after this. 

    It amazes me how people can either sign up for something and not read/learn about it, or just assume that the terms will be ignored if they file a claim.
    If I have a $500 deductible on my car and get in an accident, I will be paying that $500 deductible if my car is 1 month old or 10 yrs old. NO DIFFERENCE and my Honda dealership is not going to intervene with my insurance agent to see if "something can be done"!!!!!!!!
    And yes, Assurion is a SEPARATE company from Verizon. They also provide insurance for other cellular providers such as
    AT&T
    Cellular One
    Cellular One San Luis Obispo
    Clear
    Clearwire
    Comcast
    Dobson Cellular
    Edge Wireless
    Boost Mobile
    Virgin Mobile USA
    MetroPCS
    nTelos
    Palm
    Rural Cellular
    Sprint
    Time Warner Cable
    T-Mobile
    Tracfone
    Verizon Wireless

  • When I check for software updates only itunes and random other updates show up but not security updates or safari update. When i check installed updates I realized my last security update was 2011-004 and I still have safari 5.0.6. Can anyone help me?

    When I check for software updates only itunes and random other updates show up but not security updates or safari update. When i check installed updates I realized my last security update was 2011-004 and I still have safari 5.0.6. Can anyone help me?

    Don't panic. OS X 10.5.8 is the most popular PowerPC OS out there. People run it everyday without security breaches, including myself. It isn't Windows!
    If you're really that worried, I highly recommend Sophos Anti-Virus for Mac Home Edition. Supports PowerPC & Intel and Mac OS X 10.4-10.7.
    http://www.sophos.com/en-us/products/free-tools/sophos-antivirus-for-mac-home-ed ition/system-requirements.aspx
    Direct download: http://downloads.sophos.com/home-edition/savosx_73_he.dmg

  • Firefox 4 won't work on my Mac OSX 10.4.11, it says Firefox 3.6.17 is not secure?

    I keep getting messages to upgrade to FireFox 4, and it will not open on my Mac OSX 10.4.11. I get messages that the 3.6.17 version is not secure.

    Firefox 3.6.x versions are still updated with security patches (Firefox 3.6.18 is due in about two weeks).
    You are unfortunately out of luck with an Intel Mac and OS X 10.4.11.<br />
    There is a compatible version from for a PowerPC Mac, but no alternative for an Intel Mac.

  • Ebay sign in page does not have padlock-states only partially encrypted..IE has padlock. Why is ebay's sign in page not secure in Firefox? FF Version 14.0.1

    When signing into ebay, the page starts to load with the green padlock, but when page is fully loaded there is no padlock. I can use Internet Explorer and so to the sign in page and it has the green padlock.
    Why in Firefox is this sign in page not secure? Thanks

    Firefox 18 will have this.
    It currently applies #identity-box[class="unknownIdentity mixedContent"] or #identity-box[class="unknownIdentity mixedActiveContent"], so that part is working, but the icon and UI (notification bar) hasn't been implemented yet.
    *resource:///chrome/browser/skin/classic/browser/
    (Bug 782654 - Implement Mixed Content Blocker UI)
    This code in userChrome.css works in Firefox 15 and later.
    <br />
    <pre><nowiki>@namespace url("http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul"); /* only needed once */
    #urlbar[pageproxystate="valid"] > #identity-box.unknownIdentity.mixedContent #page-proxy-favicon,
    #urlbar[pageproxystate="valid"] > #identity-box.unknownIdentity.mixedActiveContent #page-proxy-favicon {
    list-style-image: url("chrome://browser/skin/Security-broken.png")!important;
    -moz-image-region: auto!important;
    #urlbar[pageproxystate="valid"] > #identity-box.unknownIdentity.mixedActiveContent {
    background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(hsl(1,90%,88%), hsl(3,80%,80%))!important;
    box-shadow: 0 1px 0 hsla(2,81%,16%,.05) inset!important;
    -moz-border-end-color: hsla(2,81%,16%,.2)!important;
    color: hsl(2,81%,16%)!important;
    </nowiki></pre>
    The customization files userChrome.css (interface) and userContent.css (websites) are located in the chrome folder in the user profile folder.
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Editing_configuration

  • Oracle ebs in secore or not secure mode

    Hi all,
    How can we come to know the mode of running oracle ebs 11i(secure or not secure)?
    Thanks

    How can we come to know the mode of running oracle ebs 11i(secure or not secure)?11i: A Guide to Understanding and Implementing SSL for Oracle Applications [ID 123718.1]
    Running Configuration Wizards from the Command Line in Oracle Applications 11i [ID 277574.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • PayPal sent me a notice that my browser was not secure and to update immediately, but Firefox says I am up to date. What do I do?

    PayPal sent me a notice that my browser was not secure and to update immediately, but Firefox says I am up to date. What do I do?

    Paypal never sends messages like that. It sounds like a phishing attempt. Go ahead and delete the message, but report it to Paypal so that they can take investigate.
    You can report it here: https://cms.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/?cmd=_render-content&content_ID=security/suspicious_activity

  • Why there is not "security.enable_md5_signatures" option in some instllations of Firefox 28?

    In some instllations of Firefox 28 there is not "security.enable_md5_signatures" option.
    Where it is present, making it "true" not allow to be used md5 certificates like versions before 28.

    Thank you very much for useful explanation.
    Finally, from removing of "security.enable_md5_signatures" option, we must understand that MD5 certificates will not be supported from Firefox 28 and future versions, even option is set "true" in user set after updating the browser?
    We are familiar that from Firefox 16 there is no longer supporting MD5 as a hash algorithm in digital signatures, but if "security.enable_md5_signatures" option is set "true", browser works with them. May be this was changed [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795398 here] and MD5 support is stopped?

  • I cannot activate copy text tool even though pdf file is not secured.

    I cannot activate copy text tool even though pdf file is not secured.

    What version of Acrobat are you using? Are you sure that the document contains any actual text, as opposed to an image of text?

  • Cannot sign into hotmail says it is not secure

    I have been trying to log into hotmail. Note comes up says the site is not secure.

    Hi Marty3000,
    I apologize, I'm a bit unclear on the exact nature of your issue. If you are getting some form of security alert regarding a website in Safari, you may find the following article helpful:
    Safari 6 (OS X Mountain Lion): Identify secure websites and avoid frauds
    http://support.apple.com/kb/PH11947
    Regards,
    - Brenden

  • Message: Java 7 is not secure

    When I navigate in one of the bank websites, on each screen I get a Java version not secure error message.  The issue began 5-2-13; java control panel says I'm on v.7 and up to date.  Other  posts indicte that rolling to prior version is not effective.
    What should I do?
    Firefox
    OS 10.7

    rick wintomac wrote:
    When I navigate in one of the bank websites, on each screen I get a Java version not secure error message.  The issue began 5-2-13; java control panel says I'm on v.7 and up to date.  Other  posts indicte that rolling to prior version is not effective.
    What should I do?
    Firefox
    OS 10.7
    Turn Java off in your preferences.
    Pete

  • Cisco aironet 1232AG is not secure

    Hi,
    I just got a Cisco Aironet 1232AG access point. I only want use the MAC address authorization to allow some of PC to access this point. I did not use WEP. I added some MAC address in 1232AG. But I found some other wireless PC also can access the 1232AG point. It looks like use the MAC address is not secure at all.

    Hi Kevin,
    Check out these 2 links about MAC filters:
    MAC Address Authentication to the Network
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080184a87.html#1034875
    Assigning Authentication Types to an SSID
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080184a87.html#55579
    Hope this helps!
    Rob
    Please remember to rate helpful posts.......

  • Password entered is not secure

    I've tried to reset my password via the link I got in mail and any password with combination of (special) characters and numbers is refused with the following message:
    "The password you entered is not secure. Please click the Password rules link for guidance on creating a password"
    I also tried to create a new Jabber account and there the problem is the same. Any password entered is refused...
    Tried IE and FF but same problem...
    On the website: https://www.ciscojabbervideo.com/home it is still indicated 'Beta'. Does this means this website/application is not maintained?
    rgds, Geert Folens.

    Try Forget This Network.
    Settings>Wi-Fi>tap little arrow on right of network.
    http://i1224.photobucket.com/albums/ee374/Diavonex/ea2bf71cacb51e31d8a771a9f29d7 486.jpg

  • I am getting this certificate error: The security certificate presented by this website is not secure. .

    I have installed the https certificate and I get this error when browsing to my server using https:  I can get to the server in FireFox but not in IE.  I tried disabling add-ons, compatibility mode, but it did not help.  There is not an option
    to continue on to the site, only option is to close the session.
    We are running IE11, the server I am trying to reach is running on VMWare.  We have all recommended updates installed.
    There is a problem with this website’s security certificate.
    The security certificate presented by this website is not secure.
    <id id="securityCert2">Security certificate problems may indicate an attempt to fool you or intercept any data you send to the server.</id>
    We recommend that you close this webpage and do not continue to this website.
    Thank you

    Hello Dean Wainwright,
    Do you mean after installing the certificate, you still can’t visit the website?
    Please refer to the following blog to install the certificate to Trusted Root Certification Authorities and then check if the issue still exists.
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2007/04/10/installing-a-self-signed-certificate-as-a-trusted-root-ca-in-windows-vista.aspx
    Best regards,
    Fangzhou CHEN
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Popups still occur and new windows not in tabs; firefox not secure

    After having read the excuse that Firefox can't stop all popups because malware may be calling unpublished APIs,
    WHY DONT YOU TREAT INTERNAL window-create APIs as if they were external network requests that require secure key authentication?!?
    Since this is a particularly sensitive operation, causing much pain when it is not secured against hackers,
    DONT TREAT IT LIKE A TYPICAL INTERNAL API!!!

    Type '''about:config''' in the Location (address) bar and press the "Enter" key. When you see a warning, click '''I'll be careful, I promise!''' button.
    * Preferences that have been modified are shown as '''bold (user set)'''.
    * Preferences can be '''Reset to the default''' or changed via the right-click context menu.
    -> In the '''Filter bar''' type '''browser.link.open_newwindow'''
    * Right click the preference '''browser.link.open_newwindow''' and click '''Modify'''
    * change the value to '''3'''
    * click OK
    -> In the '''Filter bar''' type '''browser.link.open_newwindow.restriction'''
    * Right click the preference '''browser.link.open_newwindow.restriction''' and click '''Modify'''
    * change the value to '''0''' (zero)
    * click OK
    -> Close the '''about:config''' tab and then Restart Firefox.
    Check and tell if its working.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Canon scanner not communicating with mac min using OS 10.5.8

    I am using a mac mini with OS 10.5.8.  I am trying to scan in papers with a Canon Canoscan N1240U.  This is the message I am receiving.      Cannot communicate with canner.      Cable may be disconnected.         Check status.         Scanner driver

  • My iMac needs to be rebooted every time I put it to sleep

    My iMac needs to be rebooted almost every time when I wake it from sleeping. Is this normal?  Ether the screen darkens and it will tell me to reboot by holding down the power button or the screen is just totally blank. It's been doing it for a long t

  • Sales summary in terms of items sold

    Hi all, I have one requirement for which i need your help: Customer Wise Synthetic & Worsted Sale To Be Made Available Separately. i.e two items are there... synthetic and worsted fabrics. The client wants to have the list of customers who have bough

  • Html:link to c:url

    <html:link action="/DispatchAddAction.do?method=Delete"> <fmt:message var="btnDelete" key="btn.delete" bundle="${appbundle}"/> <c:out value="${btnDelete}"/> </html:link> this is working fine. Trying now to use JSTL c:url <c:url value="/DispatchAddAct

  • Getting runtime error when field is in negative quantity ?

    Hi all, Iam developing a dialog program in that I want display total even if it is in negative quantity, but the problem is when the total is negative iam getting dyn_pro field conversion error ? i referred my total to co_menge data element which acc