ATG Promotion rule not working

I have a requirement that if the order contains 3 specific products then apply $2 off on each of those products.
I made an Order-Amount Off promotion something like the following, but it doesnt seem to work.
[When order contains atleast 1 product named A and order contains atleast 1 product named B and order contains atleast 1 product named C]
[upto 3 product named A and product named B and product named C]
Can someone tell me if there is anything wrong with the above condition and offer, coz if i change the offer to something like following it works
[upto 3 product named A or product named B or product named C]
but the only thing with this is if i change the quantity of A to 2 then rule gets applied to A twice and B once but C is left alone.
Edited by: 881991 on 12 May, 2012 11:58 AM

Hi,
[upto 3 product named A and product named B and product named C]
I think this rule will never be satisfied , because it implies - Apply promotion to 3 products named A,B and C - > ( means a product whose name is A ,B and C which is not possible).
For you requirement may be you can create 3 promotions (Amount off ):
[When order contains atleast 1 product named A and order contains atleast 1 product named B and order contains atleast 1 product named C]
[upto1 product named A]
[When order contains atleast 1 product named A and order contains atleast 1 product named B and order contains atleast 1 product named C]
[upto1 product named B]
[When order contains atleast 1 product named A and order contains atleast 1 product named B and order contains atleast 1 product named C]
[upto1 product named C]
Or you may also give a thought to create Order promotion which gives some dis-count on order if order contains these 3 items , this way you can manage with one promotion.
~ Praveer

Similar Messages

Infopath form load rule not working in browser forms but works on Client

Hi
I am working on an Infopath form and there are rules on form load. The form load checks for a value in a list, if the username() matches the one in the list, then the form would change its view.
It works when I open it on client, but on the browser it fails.
Have anyone encountered such an issue.

Check below:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16222681/infopath-rule-is-not-running-when-checking-sharepoint-list-field-value
Ensure that "Include data for the active form only" was checked (I had to separate this field into another data connection because that box could not be checked for another field I was using), and
Ensure that in the rule I was selecting from the "dataFields" folder under the data connection instead of "queryFields"
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/28554/infopath-form-load-rules-not-working
if I edit the Infopath form on Infopath 2007, it seems that the rules for the load form will be visible if created.
This look like a bug. Here are the steps below that will lead you to the bug:
Step 1: Open the infopath form in Infopath 2010 and create 6 rules for Form Load and Save it as a file.
Step 2: Open that infopath form that you created in Step 1 in InfoPath 2010 and go to the
Form Load section. You will only see the first 5 rules. The 6th rules that you created for Step 1 will just "vanish". Now, close that infopath form.
Step 3: Open that infopath form that you created in step 1 in InfoPath 2007 and select Tools > Form Option. In the
Open and Save category, click the Rules button and add a new rule in it and save it.
Step 4: Open that infopath form that you modify as describe in Step 3 in InfoPath 2010. That 6th rule will be visible.
Therefore, there might be a bug in InfoPath 2010 that restrict Rules to a max of 5 in Form Load and thus if anyone open that form in SharePoint, only the first 5 rules will be executed.
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

Defaulting Rules Not Working for Repair Orders in OM?

Hi,
Defaulting Rules have been setup for return line & standard line based on few conditions and it is working fine if we create a sales order directly from OM (Manual SO)?
But in our project we are using Depot Repair(Repair Orders), we tried to create a service request and then converted to a sales order here defaulting rules not working for repair orders?
Please help me to solve this issue ASAP.
Thanks,
Kishor

Hi,
You have like this:
1. Price list
2.OE_DEFAULT_PVT.Get_SOB_Currency_Code
You have to make
1. XXOE_DEFAULT_PVT.custom_code
2. Price list
3.OE_DEFAULT_PVT.Get_SOB_Currency_Code
Did you made own custom code to pick currency?
Regards,
Luko

Alert Rule - not working. Wild Card character issue

Hi All,
I have a requirement where I need to trigger alerts for mapping failures
of all the interfaces whose namespace is urn:abc.com:odna* or urn:abc.com.odna*. (in the first instance, there is dot before odna and int he second instance, a colon before odna )
So to suit both the cases, I gave urn:abc.comodna in the Alert Rule.
It worked before. But now its not working.
Then when i changed it to urn:abc.com:odna* it works again. i really dont understand how it worked before and why it fails now.
What is the reason for the unpredicatable behaviour of WildCard Character based Alert Rules?
Should Wild Card Characters be avoided completely?

Hey
Just create two separate alert rules for the same alert category
one for urn:abc.com:odna* and another for urn:abc.com.odna*.
but before that please make sure that "Suppress multiple alerts of this rule" box is unchecked.
Also please check SAP Note 913858
Thanx
Aamir
Edited by: Aamir Suhail on May 20, 2009 9:16 AM

Rule not working in workflow but works in simulation mode

Hi guys
i have one more strange issue. I have a rule assigned to one of my task to dtermine the agnet based on a z table which is executed by a z function module in the rule. The rule works fine and gets the desired agent when run in the simulation mode. But when we test it from the workflow it dosent seems to be working. When i check the workflow log it says no agent for this task. any idea what am i missing?
thanks in advance.

Hi
yes both the workflow and the dialog step( in our case a decision step) is categorized as General task. I also have used the SWU_OBUF to refresh the buffer but still the same results. Rule works fine in simulation but when it is run in a workflow the workflow log says no agent found. any more suggestions? the workflow to rule binding is fine as well. The rule requires 3 parameters and in the binding i am pasing all the 3 elemts to the rule containers. so i am not sure why its not working?

Substitution rule not working

Hi
The substitution rule for getting the desired Business place and Section code is not working in Transaction code MRIS, whereas this substitution rule is working in all other Transaction codes.
Please suggest.
Regards
Prakash

Bhanu,
Subsitution rule works when you are posting in Financial Accounting tables: BSEG and BKPF. FB60 and MIRO do that.
The report doesn't make post in mentioned tables to get substitution done. Please make sure if there is a existing call transaction or only a planning are being assigned.
regards

Delete rule not working

I subscribe to a mailing list using a particular email address (not my primary account), all mail for which is redirected into a mailbox. I only want to keep messages from the last five days. I have a Rule which is set as follows:
If ALL of the following conditions are met:
Account = <the account>
Date Received is Greater Than 5 days old
Perform the following actions:
Delete Message
This rule does does not work. It is the first rule in my list of Rules. And it simply does nothing. Why?

Maxplanar,
Mail rules only run when the item is first processed. So you are in effect going to delete things only when they are received in an "old" state.
I would set up a smart mailbox or two. One to only show the 5 days of mail you want to pay attention to. Optionally make another smart mailbox to contain messages older than 5 days. You can just refer to the first mailbox and only see the messages you want. The other mailbox will be there for once a month when you select all the messages and delete them.
Most macs can handle 5 to 10 thousand messages without even starting to slow down. Perhaps once you have a managable folder that shows you the messages you care to see, you can live with manually cleaning up much less often?

Derivation Rules Not Working for other company codes

Hi,
I have 5 Company codes and only for one FM was activated. now i want to activate FM for all 5 company codes. for which i have assigned the FM area to all 5 company codes. I have also assigned the derivation strategy to all 5 company codes as well. now when i post a transaction for any other company code derivation rules is not being process hence no commitment item or fund center is derived. however for the original company code for which FM was activated in the first derivation rule are working fine means system is deriving commitment item and fund center. can any one tell me why derivation rules are not working for other company codes? do i have to add Company code in source field of derivation strategy? could this be the reason? because in beginning there was no other company code so we did not included any company code field in the first place.
Regards,

Faizan,
Go to Funds Management Government> Actual and Commitment Update/Integration> Activate/Deactivate Funds Management.
In the screen create an entry for each Company Code and Funds Management Area combination.
Activate the AA Derivtn flag if you want the derivation to be called and the Update flag if you want to update commitments and actuals in FM.
Thanks
Shyam

Copa derivation rule not working for Discount GL

Hi All,
Kindly note that I have a distribution rule where company & plant combination is used where condtion is that customer group 3 should be 018 and then replace distribution channel to 03.However the rule is not working for discount GL posted in the billing document.
I tried testing it in FB50 but then it does not allows me to enter plant and because of that derivation rule fails. However in my billing doc I do see a plant against discount GL and still the rule is not getting picked.
I had raised this issue earlier but the reply where not as expected and so I have rephraised my question.
Kindly help me on this.
Regards
Pranay

Hi Pranay
I could not understand your req to a great detail, following are my observations
1. There should be derivation rule in place 1st of all to derive customer group from billing doc...
Check if Cust Group is populated in your COPA doc or not.. For this cust group should be a segment level char in KEQ3
2. Create a derivation rule using method "Derivation".
Source fields would be Cust Group, Plant and Company code ( I guess you want to change dist channel with this combination)
Target field would be VTWEG (Dist Channel)....Click on the magnifying lens beside VTWEG and choose relevant radio button "Overwrite if ......."
CLick on RULE VALUES and maintain the required Values there
This should work...
Regards
Ajay M

Role membership rule not working

Hi guys,
When I create a role and assign 'membership rule' to it, the members are shown in preview screen.
But they are not show up in members screen of that role.
My environment is 11gR2 SP1.
It is working nicely in 11gR2 base. But from some bundle pack and after, it is not working.
1. is it right?
2. if then, why is it changed?
3. and how shoul I assign members to role?
(as a workaround I modified the memner arrtibute. => not working
and restart OIM, => still not working
and reboot the server.> still not working...)
can anyone help this?
regards,
dongsu

J,
It has been a critical issue in real customer project this year.
Certainly we informed it to local oracle team and they says it is intentional change and we have to accept it.
(means create role first and read in users by trusted recon from source again.. bra bra..)
But I do not get any documented information about it.
Actually in BP4 (may be..) if I change any attribute value of that user who supposed to belongs to that role, then it works.
But in BP7 and now in PS1, even that approach do not working.

Some smart album rules not working

At a bit of a loss here - either my upgrade to Mavericks or my upgrade of Aperture to 3.5 has caused my Smart Albums to not work with various EXIF checking rules.
I frequently have rules which check the EXIF tag, Camera Make, and check if it is Canon - this allows me to filter out and focus on my Canon 5D3 photos and not get distracted in relatively pointless editing of iPhone snaps. Unfortunately it doesn't work. Camera Make is Canon returns no matches, Camera Make starts with Canon returns nothing, Camera Make ends with Canon returns nothing.
If I go and look at a photo, I can see the Camera Make exif flag says "Canon" in the field. No spaces at the end or anything silly. It used to work.
Anyone experienced similar? Anyone have solutions?

Hmm, interesting. Given your use of quotes I just tried "Canon" including the double quotes, but that made no difference either.
The EXIF filter is the only rule on the smart album, and while the smart album is set for a single project, there are several hundred photos that should match in it. If I set the smart album to "Library" rather than the project, it still matches none...! Just in case there's some other rule burried away that just isn't displayed, I switched the smart album to "Match Any" rather than "All", and that too returns no photos.

MRIS Substitution rule not working

Hi
the Substitution rule to populate the Business Place and Section code is working with all other transaction codes like FB60, MIRO etc., but not working with MRIS (Mass MIRO) by which we are facing problem in J1INCHLN. Please suggest regarding.
SAP Marketplace has rejected siting it as consulting issue.
Regards
Prakash.

Bhanu,
Subsitution rule works when you are posting in Financial Accounting tables: BSEG and BKPF. FB60 and MIRO do that.
The report doesn't make post in mentioned tables to get substitution done. Please make sure if there is a existing call transaction or only a planning are being assigned.
regards

Rules not working any more in mail.app

Hello,
in my MBP yosemite ( Exchange mail ), I configured some rules. They used to work fine . But since this morning, I noticed that my rules are not working any more.
I checked on console log and noticed the Assertion Failure when applying manually the rules :
Dec 19 10:35:42 Ph3NyX Mail[1382]: *** Assertion failure in -[MFEWSStore _copyMessagesByID:toStore:settingFlags:newMessages:error:], /SourceCache/Mail/Mail-1993/MailFramework/EWS/MFEWSStore.m:337
Dec 19 10:35:42 Ph3NyX Mail[1382]: exception raised in routeMessages: Destination store does not have a folder ID
Can you please help me to fix this ?
Thanks a lot.
Best regards,
Omega BK

I don't know if its connected but I also just noticed a problem. In my case all the rules I had set have changed so that they apply after 7days (rather than the 30 days I had originally set). I can't get them to change back no matter how may times I try.

Rules not working with iCloud anywhere

Hi, Rules are not working with my icloud account, if I set up a rule at icloud.com the mail arrives in my inbox and ignores the rule, same thing on my Mac in the mail app, all my rules that worked great with mobileme are not working with icloud, the mail is just piling up in the inbox. Other accounts are fine but icloud is ignoring all the rules . . . . . anyone else experiencing this please?

come on Apple. are you listening?
"It just works"? Really?
the worst PR is a product that doesn't do what it says it will.

Mail Rule Not Working

I have a rule that is not working in Mail.app.
It's a mailing list that I am subscribed to which I want deleted at certain times. Upon arrival, I would like it deleted.
I've tried several simple rules that all do not work for this list alone. I've sniffed the subject, which has a list tag shoved in there: [thisList]. I've tried a header field called List-ID and provided a CONTAINS for the actual email address of the list. I've also tried sniffing the list address as a recipient. In these trials, I've only used one qualifier, and only one process, to delete the file.
It is a GMail address, which shows up in a folder that is a GMail rule to pull out my lists. So it shows up twice, once in this folder, and once in All Mail. This is an IMAP account into my Mail.app.
So now I have 2 messages in my Gmail lists folder, the same 2 in my All Mail, and 2 in my Smart Mailbox which is showing the very 2 are in the filtered Gmail mailbox.
Upon choosing Apply Rules, they finally go away.
Is there a way to get Gmail systems to work with IMAP properly without having multiple boxes show up? That integration is confusing and problematic when trying to apply smart mailboxes on the Mac end of things, as GMail messes up the number of mailboxes where certain messages are showing up. I've tried turning off certain mailboxes being shown on the Gmail side, but I can't seem to make a Gmail address work well with IMAP.
Any insight or advice appreciated.

Google supports the IMAP protocol, but has a number of proprietary additions/extensions/implementations that it uses to support google-specific functions. While these add a lot of functionality when using Chrome and Google's webmail applications, they sometimes cause odd problems that people have to deal with. Rule management might be one of these.
Another thing to keep in mind is that rules in Mail are automatically applied to incoming messages only, and not to mail that has previously been downloaded. That is, you cannot have a rule automatically delete or label month-old mail without specifically invoking it on the current mailbox or message selection.

ATG Promotion rule not working

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for