ATI and NVidia Card in MacPro - Setting primary GPU

Hi
I have a ATI 5870 (offiical, from apple store) in slot 1 and a NVidia GT120 (came with purchase) in slot 2, I want the computer to do the processing with the faster, bigger, better, I-paid-lot-of-money-for-this 5870, but things like Cinema 4D seem to want to use the GT120. I'm no expert on the technical side of thing, I just look at the cinebench and OpenGL info which all say GT120...
Any tips on how to mane the 5870 the "main GPU" card, I commonly use more than 3 displays in the area of work I'm in so would prefer not to have to keep putting in / taking out the card.
OS X 10.6.8
Mac Pro 4.1
8 Core 2.26gHz
ATI 5870 - Slot 1
NVidia GT120 - Slot 2
Thanks,
Ryan

Thanks,
By defualt my main 2 screen run into the 5870, but when I view the OpenGL info in C4D it shows that the GT120 is doing the GPU work, and there is no sign of the 5870, but when the GT120 is removes it uses the 5870...

Similar Messages

ATI and Nvidia cards together?

Is it possible to run an Nvidia card with an ATI card simultaneously? I have a 2007 mac pro with the stock 7300gt. I need another graphics card for a third monitor and would like to purchase the new ATI 3870. Does anyone here have an Nvidia and ATI card running together? Are there any issues? Thanks.

Hi Ashuta,
With respect, I think you confused it. I replied to dualrecto's question. As I didn't want to assume what he meant, I took the opportunity to answer to it in relation to both OS X and Windows. His question concerned the 7300 and the 3870, not the latter and 8800.
I haven't seen any info that the 8800 and the 3870 could run together in OS X. However, as was written in the Macnn post that I linked to in the second of the two Apple Discussions links you included, the "no-mixing of video card rule" apparently doesn't apply to the newer Mac Pros. Since the ATi 2600 and the nVidia 7300 work simultaneously under OS X perhaps the 8800 and the 3870 will also work under OS X (and saying that, perhaps it will be possible to run also the combo dualrecto is seeking).
Whether you should switch to the 3870: I guess it depends on what you want to use the cards for. The 8800 is superior in 3D rendering provided the application can take advantage of it's OpenGL functions. Which is why it does well as a gaming card. If not, it seems the 3870 is a better bet: http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/Graphics/ATI3870_Mac_PC_review/radeonhd3870review.html.
Good luck!
/p

NVIDIA CARDS for MacPro

I just switched from apple editing to adobe editing.
What nVidia Cards are compatible with a 07-08 MacPro 3.0 quadcore?
I just burmed myself ordering a GTX570.
1,1 profile / macpro 2x 3ghz dual core / running 10.6.8

Lion has drivers for the 500 series, based on what is seen on Netkas and MacRumors. It should work with 570 as well, though may need some small modification to driver Plist. Get ATY_Init, and a 7300GT in slot 4, with the 570 in Slot 2, and you may have success.

Adobe Acrobat Pro X - Canadian ATI and Privacy Act Redaction Code Sets

Hi,
Could anyone tell me if there are any redaction code sets for the Canadian ATI and Privacy Acts, like the U.S. FOIA and U.S. Pricacy Act code sets?
Thank you.
D.

Hi Dominic ,
Please be informed that by default Acrobat supports the following two redaction code sets .
1.U.S.FOIA
2.U.S.Privacy Act .
Regards
Sukrit Dhingra

W520, Linux Mint, and nvidia card?

I'm on a W520 with a Quadro 1000m nvidia video card, running Linux Mint 17 xfce (64-bit) Recentley, I came across a situation that required OpenGL 3.3. Best I can tell, my onboard intel card cannot support above 3.1! So I went to try and get the nvidia card working. Quick note for anyone at this point... Apparentley installing the propietary drivers directley from nvidia is the worst thing to do. I went to install the bumblbee drivers (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bumblebee) and have ever since been frusterated by a non working nvidia card. I've gone to the bumblebee chat, scourd the web for my issue, tried to re-install on a fresh USB.. Nothing works. Has ANYBODY else been in this situation? What were the steps you took to get a functional nvidia card? Heres an info dump of my issues. Basically, running optirun glxgears doesn't work. $ uname -a
Linux sean-ThinkPad-W520 3.13.0-24-generic #47-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 2 23:30:00 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ optirun -vvv glxgears
[15874.859557] [DEBUG]Reading file: /etc/bumblebee/bumblebee.conf
[15874.860504] [INFO]Configured driver: nvidia
[15874.861018] [DEBUG]optirun version 3.2.1 starting...
[15874.861098] [DEBUG]Active configuration:
[15874.861134] [DEBUG] bumblebeed config file: /etc/bumblebee/bumblebee.conf
[15874.861172] [DEBUG] X display: :8
[15874.861207] [DEBUG] LD_LIBRARY_PATH: /usr/lib/nvidia-304:/usr/lib32/nvidia-304
[15874.861245] [DEBUG] Socket path: /var/run/bumblebee.socket
[15874.861281] [DEBUG] Accel/display bridge: virtualgl
[15874.861318] [DEBUG] VGL Compression: proxy
[15874.861353] [DEBUG] VGLrun extra options:
[15874.861389] [DEBUG] Primus LD Path: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/primus:/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/primus
[15874.898691] [INFO]Response: No - error: [XORG] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA GPU at PCI:1:0:0. Please
[15874.898733] [ERROR]Cannot access secondary GPU - error: [XORG] (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA GPU at PCI:1:0:0. Please
[15874.898748] [DEBUG]Socket closed.
[15874.898790] [ERROR]Aborting because fallback start is disabled.
[15874.898803] [DEBUG]Killing all remaining processes.
$ dmesg | tail
[15687.546400] NVRM: rm_init_adapter(0) failed
[15754.954991] NVRM: failed to copy vbios to system memory.
[15754.956859] NVRM: RmInitAdapter failed! (0x30:0xffffffff:867)
[15754.956868] NVRM: rm_init_adapter(0) failed
[15873.990268] NVRM: failed to copy vbios to system memory.
[15873.992196] NVRM: RmInitAdapter failed! (0x30:0xffffffff:867)
[15873.992205] NVRM: rm_init_adapter(0) failed
[15885.811425] NVRM: failed to copy vbios to system memory.
[15885.813323] NVRM: RmInitAdapter failed! (0x30:0xffffffff:867)
[15885.813332] NVRM: rm_init_adapter(0) failed
$ sudo bumblebeed --debug
[16077.147754] [DEBUG]bbswitch has been detected.
[16077.147856] [INFO]Switching method 'bbswitch' is available and will be used.
[16077.147896] [DEBUG]Active configuration:
[16077.147932] [DEBUG] bumblebeed config file: /etc/bumblebee/bumblebee.conf
[16077.147968] [DEBUG] X display: :8
[16077.148021] [DEBUG] LD_LIBRARY_PATH: /usr/lib/nvidia-current:/usr/lib32/nvidia-current
[16077.148062] [DEBUG] Socket path: /var/run/bumblebee.socket
[16077.148098] [DEBUG] pidfile: /var/run/bumblebeed.pid
[16077.148134] [DEBUG] xorg.conf file: /etc/bumblebee/xorg.conf.nvidia
[16077.148172] [DEBUG] xorg.conf.d dir: /etc/bumblebee/xorg.conf.d
[16077.148207] [DEBUG] ModulePath: /usr/lib/nvidia-current/xorg,/usr/lib/xorg/modules
[16077.148243] [DEBUG] GID name: bumblebee
[16077.148278] [DEBUG] Power method: auto
[16077.148314] [DEBUG] Stop X on exit: 1
[16077.148349] [DEBUG] Driver: nvidia
[16077.148383] [DEBUG] Driver module: nvidia_304
[16077.148418] [DEBUG] Card shutdown state: 1
[16077.148673] [DEBUG]Process /sbin/modprobe started, PID 5234.
[16077.148791] [DEBUG]Hiding stderr for execution of /sbin/modprobe
[16077.152464] [DEBUG]SIGCHILD received, but wait failed with No child processes
[16077.152571] [DEBUG]Configuration test passed.
[16077.152786] [ERROR]Daemon already running, pid 2256
$ modinfo nvidia_304
filename: /lib/modules/3.13.0-24-generic/kernel/drivers/char/drm/nvidia_304.ko
alias: char-major-195-*
version: 304.117
supported: external
license: NVIDIA
alias: pci:v000010DEd00000E00sv*sd*bc04sc80i00*
alias: pci:v000010DEd00000AA3sv*sd*bc0Bsc40i00*
alias: pci:v000010DEd*sv*sd*bc03sc02i00*
alias: pci:v000010DEd*sv*sd*bc03sc00i00*
depends:
vermagic: 3.13.0-24-generic SMP mod_unload modversions
parm: NVreg_EnableVia4x:int
parm: NVreg_EnableALiAGP:int
parm: NVreg_ReqAGPRate:int
parm: NVreg_EnableAGPSBA:int
parm: NVreg_EnableAGPFW:int
parm: NVreg_Mobile:int
parm: NVreg_ResmanDebugLevel:int
parm: NVreg_RmLogonRC:int
parm: NVreg_ModifyDeviceFiles:int
parm: NVreg_DeviceFileUID:int
parm: NVreg_DeviceFileGID:int
parm: NVreg_DeviceFileMode:int
parm: NVreg_RemapLimit:int
parm: NVreg_UpdateMemoryTypes:int
parm: NVreg_InitializeSystemMemoryAllocations:int
parm: NVreg_UseVBios:int
parm: NVreg_RMEdgeIntrCheck:int
parm: NVreg_UsePageAttributeTable:int
parm: NVreg_EnableMSI:int
parm: NVreg_MapRegistersEarly:int
parm: NVreg_RegisterForACPIEvents:int
parm: NVreg_RegistryDwords:charp
parm: NVreg_RmMsg:charp
parm: NVreg_NvAGP:int

Why are you trying to install bumblebee ? The optimus stuff is horribly designed and it's a headache in the long run. As others have suggested, use the discrete option and use either nvidia's proprietary drivers or use nouveau. Installing nvidia drivers from their site is a bad idea. Nvidia says so clearly on its website. You need to get the nvidia drivers packaged by ubuntu. You should do the following: 1) Remove the nvidia drivers that you installed manually. This could help. http://askubuntu.com/questions/206283/how-can-i-uninstall-a-nvidia-driver-completely . Make sure that nouveau isn't blacklisted. 2) Switch to the discrete option in the bios. Disable optimus detection as well in the bios. 3) Your laptop should boot normally if nouveau isn't blacklisted. 4) If you have a working system after steps 1-3 , it's not too broken. The only thing that remains is installing nvidia's propreitary drivers if you choose to. The easiest way would be to open jockey (Additional drivers) and select the nvidia driver.

GX 70 - Mantle not working Due PowerXpress: Disable iGPU / set primary GPU

Hello there,
I am a proud owner of the MSI GX70. Is there a known way to disable the iGPU from the APU?
The APU part is registered from the Catalys Driver as Primary 8650G Graphics Adapter,due the way PowerXpress Works, most games register this iGPU as Primary and only Card present.
Normaly it should work to disable the iGPU or set the Primary Card to dGPU , on systems from HP , this works well.
The Problem is that the Catalyst is not registering the 8970M as present in the System ( and also not BF4 ( even if the 8970 is running on Max the Game registers only the 8650G ) or the Star Swarm Demo ) because of this behaviour.
Therefore the speedpush through Mantle ( measured on a nearly identical HP Notebook ) from around 20 - 40 % are not reachable till a) MSI comes up with a way to set the Primary GPU or at least disabling the iGPU in any way or b) AMD comes up in xx Months with a driver Capable to see the secondary card.
Has anyone seen a solution?

Quote from: BlueAlexFPS;100063
Hello WoFNuLL,
I would like to recommend you to set this function at AMD Catalyst Control Center,
choose the switchable graphics and select high performance discrete graphics to use.
Hi BlueAlexFPS: This will not work, as the Graphics Driver registers everytime the APU Part to the Game Engine, even if the Dedicated GPU is already running ( tryed this by giving BF4.exe High Performance and the Windows Calculator also , startet the calc, saw the switch between the GPUs and started BF4 -> BF4 still sees only the 8650G iGPU
@highwind85:
This is what i already knew, this topic was meant to bring some attention to MSI , that an option to disable the iGPU in the Bios or via software would be a solution for this problem ( and other Problems regarding reigsering the Wrong gpu in the system ). The problem was solved on other systems with identical hardware in this way.

Can the ATI and NVIDIA coexist?

Hi everyone,
I recently installed a new ATI Radeon 5770 into my 1st gen MacPro 2006. I moved the original Nvidia GeForce 7300GT into slot #3.
I installed Snow Leopard 6.0 into a new upgraded HDD to tests out the new OS X. My other HDDs are still running Tiger and Leopard.
The problem now is that when I plug my monitor into the DVI of the ATI card, I get a black monitor. When I plug the Monitor cord into the Nvidia's DVI output, I get my normal screen.
How can I get my new ATI working?
I planned on using my old Nividia card for my 2nd monitor since the ATI is not equipped with dual DVI outputs.
What am I missing?
Rio

Hi Grant,
I did notice the possibility of using adapters for the card to support multiple monitors but I don't want to spend more money byuing them. The ATI card already cost a small fortune. I also somewhat failed to notice that the ATI 5770 only supports 10.6.x and up. I have other HDDs running on Tiger and Leopard for testing and software issues. I think I will most likely return this card and opt to find an Nvidia GeForce 8800GT wich may solve all my "issues". We'll what happens.
Regardless, thanks for "chiming" in.
Rio

ATI and multiple cards (Radeon 4850)

I'm looking to set up a triple/quad monitor configuration using my 2 ATI radeon 4850s and arch (64 bit) I was pleasantly suprised that simply installing the xf86-video-ati driver was sufficient to get 2 of my 4 monitors working with apparently-acceptable 2d and 3d support right out of the box! Is there any hope, however, of getting my other two monitors working in a similar fashion, or am I stuck with my 2-monitor configuration? I had a 4 monitor setup under OpenSUSE and the ATI catalyst proprietary driver, but I'm beginning to believe it a lost cause under arch. Any thoughts or experiences to the contrary?

the open source driver should be working for you, you have probably to create a xorg.conf and specify the "BusID" option in your "device" section. Check this site for an exapmple.
good luck,
matse

ATI ou NVidia

I'm considering buying a new desktop, but I'm not very familiar with the performance of ATI and NVidia cards. I'm going to prefer to use xf86-video-ati or xf86-video-nouveau. So do either of these open-source drivers produce particularly better performance than the other on similarly stacked ATI or NVidia cards.

The ATI open source driver is far better than the nvidia open source driver, see
http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature
http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/FeatureMatrix
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=a … ison&num=1
Greetings,
matse
Edit: When it comes to proprietary drivers it's the other way around
Last edited by matse (2011-11-16 20:33:37)

Mac Pro 3.1 (early 2008) and nVIDIA Quadro FX5600

Hi all,
I am triying to install nVIDIA Quadro FX5600 on a Mac Pro 3.1 (early 2008).
Well, indeed I have been using this graphics card in this computer already, however, a few hours after installing the card, I updated the Mac OS, and there began the problems.
Characteristics:
-Mac Pro 3.1 (early 2008)
-2 x 2,8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
-12GB 800 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM
Graphics cards:
-slot 1: ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
-slot 2: nVIDIA Quadro FX5600
The story is a little bit long, however I think it is important to give the maximum information:
1-I purchased the nVIDIA Quadro FX5600, and took the computer and the card to an apple reseller to install it.
2-They installedit, physically, in slot 2, and left in slot 1 the ATI Radeon, the card included in the computer when I purchased it.
3-They told me that after installing the drivers in Mac OS 10.10.2, when restarting the computer after installing, they had kernel panic problems.
4-They installed the card in another Mac computer with Mac OS 10.9.5 to check if the card was compatible with Mac, and it worked perfectly.
5-And finally, "they say", that they repeated the same operation than in point 2 and 3, also in my computer, and this time they didn't have kernel panic problems. So I took the computer at home, ready to use my new graphics card
6-When I arrived at home, I worked about 4/5 hours with the computer, and before ending the day and closing the computer, I installed two Mac updates. One of them was a security update and the other one an iMovie update. The first one worked, however the iMovie one didn't, it gave an error. I decided to give no importance and close the app store.
7-Just after closing the app store, it appeared a message from nVidia controller, saying that there was a new update. So I install it, and once installed, it recommended to restart the computer, so I restarted.
8-When the computer restarted, before loading the Mac OS desktop, they appeared the kernel panic problems, and seconds after the computer restarted automatically again. The same thing continuosly, all the time.
9-The computer's disk is divided into two parts, Mac OS and Windows 7 professional. So I decided to erase all the content in the Mac OS part and install the OS 10.10.2 again from zero (I have a copy in time machine of all my documents).
10-Once Mac OS 10.10.2 (14C1510) installed again, I have installed the Quadro & Geforce Mac OS X driver release 343.02.02 again which is the driver compatible with the operative system.
11-The same problem has occured, when restarting the computer after installing the drivers, the same problem as in point 3 occurs again.
12-I repeated the same operation as in point 9 and 10, however, this time, before restarting the computer after installing the nVIDIA drivers, I installed the CUDA 6.5.46 driver, and the same problem has occured.
The key is that the computer has been working with this graphics card, however, the story has turned crazy...
Anyone has experienced the same problems? Any clue about it?
Many thanks in advanced!

You probably read how that 10.10.2 security update changed the build number of the OS, how Apple is still using really old Nvidia driver from 10.8.2.
So called "Security Update 2015-002" from today will purposely break nVidia drivers! ( 1 2 3)
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1853748
Mixing ATI and Nvidia in older versions of Windows was a no-no.
With 10.10 I would ditch the 2600XT, it is doing nothing for you except taking up a slot.
you really just could ask and no need to drag 60 lbs and have someone else put a GPU in and attach the 6-pin aux power.
Another site along with MacIntouch to check daily and keep your eye on:
http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/
Nvidia Graphics Driver Update for OS X 10.10.2 w/Security Update 2015-002
Nvidia download page for Graphics driver 343.02.02f03 for OS X 10.10.2 (build 14C1510). Here's a clip from the main D/L page tab (other than version info typical boilerplate).
"New in Release 343.02.02f03
Graphics driver updated for OS X Yosemite 10.10.2 (14C1510) Contains performance improvements and bug fixes for a wide range of applications.
Includes NVIDIA Driver Manager preference pane."
See linked page for more info. (As of March 12th post date still links to Cuda 6.5.46 from January 28th but that could change.)

Disable Nvidia Card Using Bumblebee

Hi,
I had Nvidia Optimus disabled through BIOS but it seems their is a neat way to disable Nvidia NVS 4200 in Arch using Bumblebee which is very helpful as I am still setting up my Arch system and use windows and nvidia card. Nvidia card adds another 5 degrees of heat to my system and I would like to disable it when using Arch.
I installed bumblebee and bumblebee-thinkpad_w520_t520_t420 from AUR. I have added bumblebee group. bumblebee and dkms is in daemon category of rc.conf and nvidia and acpi_call is in module section. I get following error when loading nvidia module.
modprobe nvidia
FATAL: Error inserting nvidia (/lib/modules/3.1.8-1-ARCH/kernel/drivers/video/nvidia.ko): No such device
This is what i have in end of dmesg
[ 265.106489] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
[ 265.106492] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
[ 265.149082] NVRM: No NVIDIA graphics adapter found!
[ 1248.491642] NVRM: No NVIDIA graphics adapter found!
Thanks.
Last edited by donniezazen (2012-01-08 20:47:05)

Sorry, Nvidia card works but now bumblebee fails.

ATI or NVIDIA ?

First of all, Happy New Year !
Ok now, the reason I opened this thread is to get an opinion with fellow forummers on this question which people have been asking me.
" Which is better, ATI or NVIDIA ? "
And I answered that if we are comparing these two, we need to look at how to evaluate, in terms of Value? , Performance ?, and so on..
If we look at value, ATI 4 Series apart from the4870x2, have been priced at a very reasonable figure and its price to performace ratio is very worth it.
But if we look at performance,NVIDIA's gtx200 series have shaken the earth with its new gtx295, but of course the gtx295 is the ultra high performance card which not everyone can afford. In the computer market as a whole, the one that ATI and NVIDIA will give extra attention is to the mainstream line because it holds the more percentage of user worldeide over enthusiast class user.
And if we are comparing to, we need to look at what kind of games that we are going to campare on.For ATI, of course they have an advantage if they benchmark on Half Life 2 because the game was programmed to bring the best out of ATI gpu's and the same for GTA series which was programmed best fo NVIDIA.
So ladies and gentlemen, what say you ?

Yeah but when it comes to resolution etc, it is down to the monitor ie: DVI,HDMI or VGA ?
From my point of view, I choose ATI because of the price to performance ratio as considering that not all of us are Donald Trump.
For performance yes I choose NVIDIA but nowadays, it is not down to performance anymore when we want to compare products.As a whole ATI won.

Flash Player 10.1 Beta, Adobe, and Nvidia

Isn't it a bit... monopolistic of Nvidia and unfair on Adobe's part to have GPU-acceleration of H.264 video on ONLY select ATI and Intel chips, yet support a wide range of GeForce-based mobile and desktop GPUs?
I am reading the release notes found here, and I am absolutely appalled that with Adobe working with Nvidia, that Adobe hasn't considered working with ATI and even Intel to work on more GPU compatibility. In the end, this looks like who is throwing the most money around to get near-exclusivity on the next version of Flash. What's next? Adobe going to put "The way it's meant to be played" © on Flash Player?
I have an ATI HD3870 desktop version, but you only support hardware acceleration on the mobile version. What? That doesn't make sense. And, the only desktop-based GPU for consumers is the HD4000 series.
This is supposed to be the next version and next iteration of Flash-- version 10.1. This isn't supposed to be an Nvidia-mostly-exclusive software upgrade. And, according to the other article on Engadget, this only benefits the most those who have Nvidia GPUs, especially ION-based chipsets.
There is already GPU-acceleration in the current version, 10.0, but it's still not much as it will still take a significant amount of CPU processes; and this is on XP, Vista, and 7. And, version 10.1 is supposed to be a marked improvement over it. Now, it's looking like the only improvement will benefit Nvidia more than its competitors-- ATI and Intel.
So, let me ask you-- the people behind Adobe and Flash Player: Will there be more GPU compatiblity besides the small number of ATI and Intel GPUs?

Read the release notes here:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/f...leasenotes.pdf
This is Nvidia's compatibility list-
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 285
GeForce GTX 285 for Mac
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 275
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GTS 250
GeForce GTS 240*
GeForce GTS 150*
GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 230*
GeForce GT 130*
GeForce GT 120*
GeForce GT 220
GeForce 210
GeForce 205*
GeForce G100*
GeForce 9800 GX2
GeForce 9800 GTX+
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce 9800 GT
GeForce 9600 GSO
GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 9500 GT
GeForce 9400GT
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GeForce 8800 GT
GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8600 GTS
GeForce 8600 GT
GeForce 8500 GT
GeForce 8400 GS
GeForce 9400 mGPU
GeForce 9300 mGPU
GeForce 8300 mGPU
GeForce 8200 mGPU
GeForce 8100 mGPU
Ion
Ion LE
GeForce GTX 280M
GeForce GTX 260M
GeForce GTS 260M
GeForce GTS 250M
GeForce GTS 160M
GeForce GTS 150M
GeForce GT 240M
GeForce GT 230M
GeForce GT 130M
GeForce G210M
GeForce G110M
GeForce G105M
GeForce G102M
GeForce 9800M GTX
GeForce 9800M GT
GeForce 9800M GTS
GeForce 9800M GS
GeForce 9700M GTS
GeForce 9700M GT
GeForce 9650M GS
GeForce 9600M GT
GeForce 9600M GS
GeForce 9500M GS
GeForce 9500M G
GeForce 9400M G
GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M G
GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 8800M GTS
GeForce 8700M GT
GeForce 8600M GT
GeForce 8600M GS
GeForce 8400M GT
GeForce 8400M GS
This is ATI's list-
Radeon - Radeon HD 4xxx (and higher)
Mobility Radeon - Mobility Radeon HD 4xxx series (and higher)
Integrated/Motherboard - Radeon HD 3xxx (and higher)
FirePro - FirePro V3750, FirePro V5700, FirePro V7750, FirePro V8700, and FirePro
V8750 (and later)
This is Intel's list-
"Hardware video decoding of H.264 content in Flash Player 10.1 is supported on the Intel® 4 Series Chipset family, starting with the graphics driver version 15.16.2.1986 for 32/64-bit Windows Vista and Windows 7."
Something is wrong here with that list.
It's either Nvidia threw a lot of money Adobe's direction and we're going to have another "The way it's meant to be played" in the next Flash Player update, or this is a driver issue. What is it?

How to set primary key of the VO.

I have a problem with the master detail search. The search works fine on the first search, all details can be seen fine, but in the second search I get this error.
The number of displayed records, 1, exceeds the actual number of records, 0, in view object EgoItemAdvancedSearchAM.MYACCESSOR001_MYLINK001_DetailsOrderLinesVO. Some of the displayed records may have been deleted.
Somwhere in another thread, someone had the same problem and the soultion was to set primary key of the master VO. I am not sure how to set primary key of a VO. In my case the master VO is dynamic. Is there a way I can set PK of a dynamic VO.
Any help greatly appreciated.

Hi
Thanks for your reply...
am seting the primary key to VO attribute in my controller(PR)...but its not mapping to the VO attribute..
OAAttachmentImageBean Ibean = (OAAttachmentImageBean)webBean.findChildRecursive("OpAttachments");
String[] pkvaule = {"ResAttribute15"};
Ibean.setPkColumns(pkvaule);
Regards
Harrrry

990 fxa-gd65 and nvidia gtx support?

Hi all,
I just got the last of the parts for my new build and it should be bamf'n . Anyway, I spent the last two days tracking down the b2 error code. So I swapped out the Galaxy GTX 760 gpu with my old Radeon (I don't remember what it is but it's in the system now so I can't read it...) and low and behold, the system boots and i've got Window's installed and Fedora on the way.
Anyway, My question is this, Tiger Direct has already exchanged the Galaxy GTX 760 for another galaxy GTX 760 but that presented the same issue. I'm unfamiliar with MSI's resources and therefore I must ask: Are there any known issues with the 990 fxa-gd65 and NVidia cards? GTX cards? Galaxy Cards?
Would I be better off exchanging this video card for a amd or another geforce?...
The only other thing I can figure it *might* be is that the psu doesn't supply enough power for that beastly graphics card...
I'm at a loss here. I've never heard of any issue this specific to compatibility to two pieces of Hardware and this isn't my first Rodeo.
Here's the Hardware I have in there:
AMD Unlocked 8 Core 4.0 GHz with water cooing unit
990 fxa-gd65 Mobo
Thermaltake Smart M750W PSU
Galaxy GTX 760 (does not work)
2x8GB HyperX 1600MHz RAM
Toshiba 2TB 7200 RPM HDD
Thermaltake Chaser MK-I

Quote from: flobelix on 10-July-13, 03:00:02
You had various GTX760 that won't work so seems to have something to do with the rest of the system... Just try it else you will never know.
I disagree. The card seems to be the issue because it is the only thing that we swapped out that resolved the issue. While I agree that this is a good next step, it occurs to me that if a different card would also resolve the issue I would be willing to accept that path to resolution instead of taking the intermediary step of updating the bios. (which to be honest is not a very mature solution on MSI's part considering the board has no integrated graphics. So therefor if this is MSI's official stance on the issue then what you're asking of you customers that are builbing new systems is that they have another card on hand to update the bios with before installing the gtx card. That may not be much for veteran system builders like me, but many people that are building their first system or even those whos graphics have died or had integrated graphics on their last system, will get hit by this.) I say all this not to be confrontational just to point out the catch 22 that MSI is putting it's customers in.
What I want to know is if we can be sure enough that this is going to resolve the issue that I can be assured that when I get off work and home and try this (after tiger direct closes) I won't have to wait until tomorrow to go return the part.
Basically, if you're sure then that's good enough for me.
Also, on your link I do not see windows 8 support for the driver. This does work in Windows 8 correct?

ATI and NVidia Card in MacPro - Setting primary GPU

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for