ATP Check doesn't consider GR processing time for strategy 50

Dear All,
MRP strategy: 50
Create PIR
Create Sales order
Run ATP and I find SAP doesn't take GR processing time in MRP2 into account. Is there any setting for this?
Thanks!
B.R. Dazhi

Hello Jageet,
Please refer this discussion,
ATP check. Problem with GR processing time
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Similar Messages

What is Microsoft's official policy regarding the processing time for HCK2.1 Driver Submissions?

What is Microsoft's official policy regarding the processing time for HCK2.1 Driver Submissions?
Can someone point me to a document that states the official policy stating their maximum review time? This info used to be in the WLK1.6 FAQ but I don't see it for the HCK2.1 suite.
Thanks!
Al

Ian,
Thanks for your reply. Yes, I'm sure LabVIEW uses the (default) Windows timer. And yes, 1 mS is not guaranteed due to the preemptive nature of Windows (and even "RTOSs" to varying degrees), which is why I see about plus or minus 2 mS.
Apparently the Windows timer can be set by API calls. See: http://www.lucashale.com/timer-resolution/. Here's a screen shot of his TimerResolution.exe on a Windows 7 PC:
Here it is on my Windows XP PC after I set it to "Maximum" (initially it was 15.625 mS):
Notice that it sets the Maximum to less than 1 mS, which is supposed to be the max, so there are some bugs. Plus the Default button does not reset it in XP, but does work on Windows 7 or 8. (I know this is not the place to "debug" non-LabVIEW applications!)
I'll bet LabVIEW sets it, too. The only caveat, as I said, is it looks like another application can change it, since the hardware timer is a "global" timer. I have not seen this issue in my LabVIEW applications, have you?
I guess I need to do some more digging to see the code to set the timer, but it looks like the developers of LabVIEW have it figured it out.
(FYI, I did notice that running my LabVIEW app (which gives about 2 mS resolution) or a C# app, which gives 15.625 mS resolution, does not affect what TimerResolution.exe reports, so I'm not sure if it's really working correctly. If I figure it out I'll post the results.)
Ed

Why the processing time for loading is taking longtime

Hi All,
why the processing time for loading is taking longtime i want to know the soltion.
Thanks,
chandu

To analyze the process chain and fix it, go through the below document:
[SAP BW Data Load Performance Analysis and Tuning|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3a699d90-0201-0010-bc99-d5c0e3a2c87b]
Hope it helps,
Naveen

ATP check in the Sale order Processing and CO06 transaction (Confirm Qty)

Hi All,
While creating the Sale order, After performing the ATP check and saving the document i have called an user exit to make the confirmed Quantity equal to ZERO when the delivery block is set (As requested by customer). That is working fine...
But the same confirmed Quantity of ZERO is not reflecting in CO06 transaction. Its showing the old value that the value before setting the delivery block.
I have identified the table VBBE-VMENG which stores the confirmed quantity in CO06 transaction...
Could you please help me know any USER EXITS or any other solution to change the confirmed quantity to ZERO in CO06 transaction also while delivery block is set in the sale order.
Thanks &Regards,
Navaneeth

Hi All,
Please help me by providing some clues on this issue...
Regards,
Navaneeth

How to calculate the Processing time for material based on its route ?

Hello experts,
I would like to calculate the Scheduled in-house production time based on route.
Actually this is done in the prod. route in tcode CA02. (via menu Extras => scheduling => schedule).
After getting the schedule table press the 'scheduling results' button I received the Processing time, Setup and teardown time,... Scheduled in-house production time.
So I'm looking for a function or any tool to use it in report.
thanks,
Eli

hi,
from routing screen,extras>scheduling>schedule(give a variant name)>scheduling results>update material master.this writes the info in the temp file.use tcode CA96 to update material master.this updates lot size dependent in house production time in work scheduling view of material master and deletes the lot size independent inhouse prod, time in MRP2 view.this tool gives more accurate results for your inhouse prod. time.
> Hello experts,
> I would like to calculate the Scheduled in-house
> production time based on route.
> Actually this is done in the prod. route in tcode
> CA02. (via menu Extras => scheduling => schedule).
> After getting the schedule table press the
> 'scheduling results' button I received the Processing
> time, Setup and teardown time,... Scheduled in-house
> production time.
> So I'm looking for a function or any tool to use it
> in report.
>
> thanks,
> Eli

ATP check on Sales order items not due for delivery?

All,
In our Sales order, we have a number of dummy material lines. Now, when I use the normal sales order ATP check button, SAP does nothing. However, we have a custom program that does an ATP check, and it returns a zero qty.
My question is, how do we know if a material is due for delivery, before an ATP check is done? The only suggestion I have is to look at the schedule line, and see if there is a material movement behind it.
Any other ideas?

Mark
This is a classic SD Professional's dilemma, though it manifests differently at different clients. Mostly customers crib about future requirements stopping current sales orders from being delivered or Scheduling agreements with future delivery dates 'stealing' stock from Sales orders. Another manifestation is production orders usurping components from sales orders for spares and so on. ATP functionality in SAP is pulled in various directions by conflicting demands and it is difficult to satisfy everyone. Companies with chronic probelms often end up with negative ATP which is perhaps the most serious stage of the prognosis.
Your solution lies in:
1) Availability check control settings : Sales documents vs. deliveries : For the delivery, don't include 'Sales Requirements' and for the sales orders, do include 'Delivery Requirements and so on.
2) Performing nightly rescheduling (V_V2) with Delivery priority and delivery date as key sort criteria. If the volumes are not high, you can try using manual confirmation via CO06.
Take a look at this OSS note and the ones mentioned within:
36520 - Availability check for delivery

How can consider Planned delivery time for subcontracting dependent of qty

Dear guru ,
How can mrp schedule delivery date of a subcontracting purchase requisition in order to consider planned delivery time and quantity to purchase.
Thanks

dear guru ,
I want to create a self-defined info structure similar to S013.
I want to add field purchasing group from EKKO-EKGRP. The other fields are similar to S013 with the same rules.
What do you suggest i can do consider note 397864 :
You are not permitted :a) to use info structure S013 as a template for self-defined info structures (This is prevented as of Release 4.5 due to a termination message).b) to create any update rules for S013 with a self-defined update group.c) to include the enhanced update rules that are used for S013 during the definition of key figure updating into the definition of the update of a self-defined info structure (compute...).
Thanks

"Processing Time" for IPAD 2!!!! PLease help!

Hello, I know the release date for the ipad2 is 3/11, however, I will be out of the country by 3/14 night. I want to get this as a surprise gift for my girlfriend. Apple does have next day and 2nd day shipping options available, however, I am worried about their processing time.
Can anyone advise if these ipads are usually "readily available" for shipment when I order them? Thank you!

It should get there if ordered online, assuming the website says "within 24 hours but seeing as you cannot order online until the 11th, no one knows what it will be.
If you absolutely, positively need it by the 14th, I would not depend on it (being as it will just be released).
Apple and Best Buy are open till 9 pm and open on weekends.
11 March is Friday.

/etc/rc.d/network WIRELESS_TIMEOUT check doesn't work all the time

Hi, i just want to ask why the patch in this bug report isn't in core yet.
It worked as a sharm. Finay I can use my wlan.

Bump! No awnser? Who should I contact to get this on the road?

How to reduce processing time for ResultSet getter methods

In my application, I have the following code.
query = .....;
ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery(query);
while (rs.next())
var_1 = rs.getString(1);
var_38 = rs.getString(38);
The query generates 35,000 rows. It is running slowly. I checked all the code, it turn out that this WHILE loop runs the slowest. Does anyone know how I can improve the performance for this issue?
Any advice or suggestion will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
aloe9451

Now the slowest one is the while loop which get 38 columns.
We do have the requirement pulling 38 columns for 35,000 rows.The short answer: bandwidth isn't infinite.
The long answer:
35,000 rows by 38 columns, by 10 characters per column equals a little over 13 Mb, not counting protocol bytes. Adjust this upward if your fields are bigger, but I don't think you can adjust it downward very much because those protocol bytes are important.
Running FTP between my desktop computer and one of the servers here, I get a tad under 3 Mb/sec transfer rate. So, assuming that your network has similar speed, your 13 Mb of data will take no less than about 4 seconds.
However, FTP is an efficient protocol: it's just streaming bytes as fast as it can, and writing them to a file. Processing a result-set, on the other hand, is synchronous: even if you batch rows, the server still waits for the client, then sends some data, then waits for the client. THen there's the cost of client-side processing, which is going to be significant simply because you're doing close to 1 million method calls.
So yes, for your data size, 7 seconds is very reasonable. But no, for a web page, it's unreasonable ... but so is displaying all that data.

Excessive processing time for PROPFIND requests

hi,
i'm running web server 7.0U3 on Solaris 10 U5 (64-bit x86). in the 'perfdump' output, i see many PROPFIND requests for various files. for example, there are currently 324 'active sessions', of which about a third are PROPFIND - and many of these have been running for 60 seconds or more. according to the server error log, these are denied by the ACL:
[03/Nov/2008:17:10:54] security (18304): for host x.x.x.x trying to PROPFIND <URL to file>, acl-state reports: HTTP5191: access of <path to file> denied by ACL default directive 2
we don't use DAV and i have no interest in these requests, so being denied is not a problem. however, it seems to me the server is taking an excessive amount of time to deny them; i would assume, if they're denied by the ACL in PathCheck, that the response should be quick.
(the number of active PROPFINDs varies; after reloading perfdump, there are 154 active sessions, of which only four are PROPFINDs; but all have been running at least 4 seconds.)
how can i work out what's going on here - and more importantly, fix it (if there's a problem)?

mv,
here is the obj.conf for the virtual server:
<Object name="default">
        NameTrans fn="assign-name" from="/scripts/*" name="scripts"
        NameTrans fn="pfx2dir" from="/private" dir="/export/upload/fake-private"
        PathCheck fn="uri-clean"
        PathCheck fn="check-acl" acl="default"
        ObjectType fn="type-by-extension"
        ObjectType fn="force-type" type="text/plain"
        NameTrans fn="assign-name" from="/.perfdump" name="perfdump"
        <Client uri="*(.inc|\\~)$">
                Service fn="deny-existence"
        </Client>
        <Client uri="/.zfs/*">
                Service fn="deny-existence"
        </Client>
        Service method="POST" type="*~magnus-internal/*" fn="send-file" bucket="file-bucket"
        <If -f $path>
                Service method="(HEAD|GET)" type="*~magnus-internal/*" fn="send-file" bucket="file-bucket"
        </If>
        <Else>
                Service fn="restart" uri="/scripts/thumb-handler.php" bucket="missing-file-bucket"
        </Else>
</Object>
<Object name="es-internal">
        PathCheck fn="check-acl" acl="es-internal"
</Object>
<Object name="scripts">
        Service fn="responder-fastcgi" type="application/x-php" app-path="/opt/php/bin/php-cgi" min-procs="25" bucket="php-bucket"
</Object>
<Object name="perfdump">
Service fn="service-dump"
</Object>and here is the ACL:
version 3.0;
acl "es-internal";
allow (read,execute,info)
    user = "anyone";
deny (list,write,delete)
    user = "anyone";
acl "default";
authenticate (user,group) {
        method = "basic";
        prompt = "Sun Java System Web Server";
allow (read,execute,info)
    user = "anyone";
deny (list,write,delete)
        user = "anyone";server.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<server>
<cluster>
    <local-host>ms1</local-host>
    <instance>
      <host>ms1</host>
    </instance>
</cluster>
<log>
    <log-file>/var/log/http/errors</log-file>
    <log-stdout>false</log-stdout>
    <log-level>info</log-level>
</log>
<temp-path>/tmp/https-ms1-5351d5c9</temp-path>
<user>apache</user>
<file-cache>
    <enabled>false</enabled>
    <sendfile>true</sendfile>
    <cache-content>false</cache-content>
</file-cache>
<default-auth-db-name>keyfile</default-auth-db-name>
<auth-db>
    <name>keyfile</name>
    <url>file</url>
    <property>
      <name>syntax</name>
      <value>keyfile</value>
    </property>
    <property>
      <name>keyfile</name>
      <value>keyfile</value>
    </property>
</auth-db>
<acl-file>default.acl</acl-file>
<mime-file>mime.types</mime-file>
<access-log>
    <enabled>false</enabled>
    <file>/var/log/http/access</file>
</access-log>
<http-listener>
    <name>http-listener-1</name>
    <port>80</port>
    <server-name>ms1</server-name>
    <default-virtual-server-name>ms1</default-virtual-server-name>
</http-listener>
<virtual-server>
    <name>ms1</name>
    <http-listener-name>http-listener-1</http-listener-name>
    <host>ms1</host>
    <object-file>ms1-obj.conf</object-file>
    <document-root>/export/upload</document-root>
</virtual-server>
<event>
    <time>
      <time-of-day>03:00</time-of-day>
    </time>
    <rotate-access-log>false</rotate-access-log>
    <rotate-log>true</rotate-log>
</event>
<dav>
    <enabled>false</enabled>
</dav>
<thread-pool>
    <min-threads>64</min-threads>
    <max-threads>512</max-threads>
</thread-pool>
</server>i wrote a small C program to send a PROPFIND request then immediately drop the connection. i ran it a few times, but i couldn't get a 'stuck' entry in perfdump. however, the server is currently fairly idle; i'll try this again at a busier time, which is when i saw the problem originally.

File sharing lion and xtreamer doesn't work - asks every time for id

since I updated to lion, i can not share my files via smb and i have a xtreamer.
now xtreamer asks for id and password.
when go to connect with server and connect with server then i see on my tv the screen for loggin in. before lion i connected as guest, BUT I didn't HAVE TO put any details as id and pw?
can anybodey help me to solve this annoying problem?
greetings,
ernest.

Serviio will do the trick. Also very easy to do. Download and install serviio console. In Serviio console select Library tab. Add path then choose the folder from your computer that you want to share. I checked all the items on the right side of the folder box. Save!
On your Xtreamer, go to media library then UPnP (make sure that UPnP is "on". Settings, Application, UPnP Media Server ON). Wait awhile then Serviio (your computer name) will appear. Select your computer then Video then Folders. That's it! The contents of your shared folder in your computer can now be streamed. Enjoy!

Slow processing times for displaying requisitions and purchase orders

We have an issue with displaying a requisition or purchase order that has had multiple changes to the line items. It can take minutes to display them and when they finally pull up, it can take minutes to move from tab to tab, and to even expand the different sections.
It is frustrating if the last PO or req you looked at was one with a lot of changes, because if you go back into ME23N or ME53N, then it takes forever just to try and display another requisition. We are on ECC 5.0.
Does anyone else have an issue like this, or any ideas on how to fix it?
Thanks!

can you define what "many " is ?
Are you talking about 100 or 5000 ?
It should never take more than a few seconds. In any other case you might have a much to small system or much to slow database.
Performace is a task shared between basis and application.
Search OSS for performance notes. Let your basis team monitor the performance for your execution.
Why do you have that many changes for a PO or requisition?

Can anyone help with a method to ignore GR Processing Time during STO Creation?

On my current client, we have a unique business scenario where we need to maintain GR processing time to reflect "incubation or hold" time for products after production. It is absolutely necessary that the products should not be available to ship to the customers until this "incubation or hold" time is elapsed and the products are inspected & ready for customer shipments. However, the products can be shipped to other DCs within the client's internal network while the products are under "incubation" as it can take place while the products are in-transit. Therefore, the products are available for shipping immediately after production within the client's internal network of DCs. This is why we need a mechanism to ignore the GR processing time while the products are shipped on STOs within the network. At the same time the GR processing time should be considered while the products are shipped against customer SOs outside the network.
To explain the scenario a bit further, this is a simple scenario: Factory A --> DC1 --> DC2. Factory A produces products to be stored and DC1, which ships to its own customers as well as to DC2 to fulfil customer demand at DC2. "Incubation" time of products is performed in DC1. Therefore, Sales Orders at DC1 should not be able to ship until this "incubation" time has elapsed at DC1. This can be accomplished by maintaining GR processing time equal to "incubation or hold" time at DC1 and it works well for Sales Order and its Delivery ATP check. On the other hand, STOs from DC1 to DC2 can ship immediately after production while the product is still under "incubation" as the required hold time can elapse while the products are in-transit between DC1 and DC2. Therefore, STO & its Delivery ATP check should consider production from factory A to be immediately available after production. Note that the incoming production from factory A is represented by an STR between factory A and DC1. Per my research this functionality is not available in standard SAP as GR processing time is considered in ATP check for both SOs and STOs. However, if anyone knows of a way to separate out ATP check for SOs and STOs where SO considers GR processing time while STO does not then that would greatly help.
Appreciate any suggestions or solutions.
Regards,
Jagjeet.

Hello Jageet,
Please refer this discussion,
ATP check. Problem with GR processing time
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar

ATP check in va01 should consider BOM components delivery days for delivery date calculations of header material

Hi All,
My requirement is for ATP check in sales order,
I am creating sales order for header material(FG) using strategy group 40.
Its BOM consist 3-4 ROH, each ROH is assigned scheduling agreement.
EX: I am creating order on todays date for FG
IN-HOUSE production time = 5days, GR processing time = 1days
transportation time = 5days.
ROH 1= 1week, ROH 2= 2week, ROH 3 = 3weeks
Now After MRP run for FG's, planned order will be created for deficit stock.
now while doing ATP check in sales order system calculates delivery date = In-house production time + GR processing time + Transportation time.
But components for manufacturing FG's are not considered .
System should throw delivery date = In-house production time + GR processing time + Transportation time + components(ROH) delivery time (whichever is higher : As without this order delivery date is useless).
Experts Please help.

Pratik,
In R/3 ATP check carried at one level material only for which you are entering schedule/delivery lines in sales order.
If you are talking about cumulative availability check then please consider APO GATP.
There is workaround for your requirement by considering Assemble to Order Strategies.
Please go through below link Sales order availability check considering the ROH stock/procurement time
Br
KK

ATP Check doesn't consider GR processing time for strategy 50

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for