ATP check for 'stock in transfer'
I have a scenario which I created a Sales Order for 100 EA of product 'X' shipping from DC01 to a customer. DC01 does not currently have inventory for product 'X'. SAP has inventory only available in DC02.
I created a (two step) STO and an outbound delivery shipping inventory from DC02 to DC01. I issued the 100 EA of product 'X' against the outbound delivery. Transaction MB5T shows the 100 EA 'in transit'.
Under my availability check, on my sales order, the checking rule scope displays, a check on 'Include Stock in transfer'.
Why am I unable to view my stock in transit of '100' EA from the STO process when I look at the ATP check ? How can ATP view the 'Stock in transfer' from the two step STO?
Thank you,
Gustavo
Hi,
Check the settings in t.code OVZ9.
Check the box include purchase orders and select A or X in the field Incl. rel. order reqs field.
After making these settings, just test and update the results.
Do you have batches in the STO? If so are they in restricted status during "in-transit"?
Regards
Similar Messages
-
User exit in ATP Check for sales Order to trigger notification
Hi All
please let me know is there any user exit after ATP check or in ATP check for sales order to trigger a notication mail.
Regards
KishoreHi,
User Exits For Availability Check are given below:-
The user exits named here are planned for projects that are to be carried out in agreement with SAP development as they may only be used in consultation with SAP.
USEREXIT_PLANT_SELECTION in program RV03VFZZ is an exception to this rule (see below).
User exits in program FV45VFZZ
USEREXIT_ADD_FIELD_TO_HEADER
USEREXIT_ADD_FIELD_TO_LINE
User exits in program FV45VFZY
USEREXIT_DELIVERY_GROUPS
USEREXIT_MVERF_INIT
USEREXIT_QUOTA_KEY_VALUE
User exits in program RV03VFZZ
USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_IN
USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_OUT
USEREXIT_DARA_REFRESH
USEREXIT_PLANT_SELECTION
This user exit is used to adjust the flow during plant transfer. A list of permitted plants, where this material is created, is determined and checked in the standard R/3 delivery. A dialog box appears where you can select the plants. The user exits allow you to modify the plant table so that plant selection takes place in advance for every flagged selection and a dialog box becomes unnecessary.
regards
Vivek. -
ATP check for component materials
Hello experts,
The ATP check was initially designed for a kitting process. BOM Material would be kitted in the distribution center(DC) and sent to a garage. Sales orders are created with BOM materials for a garage and there is a multi- level GATP process in place. Since BOM materials do not exist at a garage the check would be performed at a DC for components after BOM explosion. The existing configurations in R3 and APO are for a make to order process(Strategy group of 50 for BOM's and 40 for component).
We are now introducing new materials for an existing material and have the need for product substitution on the sales order, if the existing material is out of stock at the DC. To enable this functionality we are having to perform an ATP check for the sales orders at the distribution center, though the sales order is created for a garage. To improve on the response times during the ATP check our design approach, is to convert the BOM materials in the sales order to component materials with material determination(one BOM material is tied to one component material) and performing the ATP check with components at the DC.
While testing we are facing the following issues:
1)Sales order placed on a garage is substituted with the DC after product substitution. This does not occur when product substitution is carried out with BOM's.
2)During the order create, the ATP checks for check mode u201845u2019 and business event u2018AEu2019 for a given material in a DC shows zero stock. While for the same material,location and business event AE the product availability check in APO reflects stocks available.
Is it feasible to do ATP checks for component material in a sales order which was initially designed to work with BOM materials? Am I missing some configuration settings in either APO or R3?
Regards,
Anil DeSouzaHi Anil,
Yes it can be done.
1) For finished product & garage combination -
activate RBATP in the check instructions.
2) in the location substitution maintain 'location determination sctivity'. Here you maintain different check mode & business event -- ( this is nothing but check instruction --- in thsi you maintain 'MATP').
Hope this anws your first qus.
To addressing your 2nd question....follow below steps.
1) Do ATP from sales order, get onto results screen, click on product availability & check for 'scope of check' (check control) and look for the stock types that are included. Based on this your receipts are consdiered for ATP confirmation.
Best Regards,
Deepthi -
Hi,
Can ATP be set for intercompany STOs?
If so , can anyone list it please.
Regards
KrishnaHi
Yes we can setup ATP check for STO...
actually ATP will be depends on the combination of the checking group and checking rule
checking group : is defined at material master sales/plant view in availability check field..
Checking rule : In standard this will be assigned to application internally ex : sales order - A (sales order)
delivery - B (delivery)..
In STO we need to define the checking rule for purchase order type and shipping plant combination...
menu path :
IMG -- MM -- Purchasing -- PO -- set up stock transport order -- assign delivery type and checking rule....
hope it solves your probs
Muthu -
Hi Gurus
Can some one explain me about the configuration of ATP for Stock Transport Orders?
Thanks
SamHello,
1. you can create your own checking rule in IMG - MM - Purchase order - Set up Stock transport order - Create checking rule
2. then you can define the checking rule in IMG - MM - Purchase order - Set up Stock transport order - Define Checking Rule.
If you create a new checking rule in the first step, you should enter a new entry here. "Availability check" field refers to the field in Material master record MRP3 view
3. assign your STO order's checking rule in IMG - MM - Purchase order - Set up Stock transport order - Assign delivery type and checking rule.
4. Go to IMG - Purchasing - Environment Data - Define Default values for buyers.
Choose "Settings for Default values", select one record, then click "Addl. scrs." tab, there is a field "Detailed information" on "Availability check for stock transfers" sub-screen.
After finishing this setting, you can assign parameter ID "EVO" for users and put the value of the record you defined in step 4.
Regards,
Gunadi -
Hi Experts
Can we perform check against deliveries in APO GATP?
What are the prerequesites to perform ATP check against deliveries.
In scope of check we want to select production orders which are in released status.
Please give your inputs.
RegardsPreetam,
After creating the supporting configuration, APO ATP checking is thereafter 'turned on' by creating and activating an ATP integration model in the ERP. Generally, it is done by material/plant combination. Therefore, if you turn on ATP checking for Sales orders, you also turn it on for all other types of docs (including deliveries) for that particular material/plant combination.
I hope you have thought out this whole process. The main reason for using ATP checking in APO is that APO has a richer suite of ATP solutions. If your business requirements are satisfied by the ATP checking in ERP, then it makes no sense to spend the money to implement ATP in APO. Your original issue had to do with making released production orders relevant for ATP for deliveries. If this is the only new requirement, then this can easily be managed in ERP. OVZ9>select your Availability check, with checking rule B (deliveries). Under "incl production orders" select 'F'. From a business perspective, this means that some of your deliveries will be created without stock on hand, and therefore will not be immediately shippable. You need to make sure that this process change is integrated throughout your warehouses.
And, to your final question. If your delivery item category(s) are already relevant for ATP checking in ERP, they will also be relevant for ATP checking in APO. Since deliveries do not use RBA, you do not have to worry about adding new ERP delivery item categories for the conversion to APO ATP checking. Most commonly in APO, one uses only the 'product check' (similar to the standard ERP ATP check) for deliveries.
Rgds,
DB49 -
Table for "Stock in transfer CC"
Hi
I am using cross company stock transfer scenarion. We can see the stock in transfer with the transaction MB5T or we can use the transaction MMBE to see the "Stock in transfer CC".
In which database table this value for "Stock in transfer CC" is stored?
Full points will be rewarded.......
Regards
SEKBE - purchase order history.
You should find there various records e.g. for the delivery, goods issue and goods receipt.
The value is not just stored in one table field, it gets calculated dynamically -
ATP check for delivery in ECC & Sales order ATP check in APO
Hi All,
Can we do an ATP check for delivery in ECC , but for the same set of Materials- Plant combination , the ATP check when a SO is created should happen in APO .
We do not want to remove the Business event 'B' which is meant for delivery in APO . For some materials we need APO ATP check to happen for delivery & for some it should be in ECC & for SO the ATP check should happen in APO .
Even if we do not have check instructions pertaining to Business event 'B' & a particular check mode (for the materials where the ATP check for delivery should happen in ECC & SO check to happen in APO) , when we are doing an ATP check for delivery , it is still pointing to APO ATP check rather than ECC check .
Any pointers for this is highly appreciated.
Regards
SurendraHi Surendra,
For SO, business event is A and for delivery it's B. When integrated with ECC, the check rule in ECC points as biz event in APO.
You can control ATP check by customized settings for check rule in ECC.
Also, by setting requirement class and requirement type in ECC, you control check mode in APO. So, even if you dont define for check mode in APO, the system might refer from ECC for the ATP check settings. Look into your ECC customization for how requirement class is derived and settings for requirement type. (based on MRP type, strategy grp and Item cat).
I'm not sure how you can control ATP to happen for some sales orders/deleveries in ECC and for some in APO, since check mode is mentioned in material master.
However, there are ATP BADIs (business add-ins) available in both ECC and APO, whch can serve your purpose.
Regards,
Bipin -
ATP Check for Bill of materials in Variant configuration
Hello Guru's,
Will variant configuration supports the following functionality please?
ATP check for Bill of materials in variant configuration is possible, is there any way to put labor cost while working on assembling variants. Material substitution is possible while configure a variant product.
Will any one share your experience that will be of great help.solved by adding an additional condition in pricing procedure
-
ATP check for multiple materials on multiple sales document
Hi,
System 4.70
Is it possible to carry out an ATP check for multiple materials on multiple sales documents.
I have written a bespoke program and the program requires an ATP check to be performed for each material and sales document, I am currently using BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY which is bringing back the necessary information but it's a bit slow.
Does any one have any ideas please.
Regards
J-JThe ATP Check using the BAPI is done per material and plant. If you're looping through sales documents and then materials you're probably doing the ATP check for the same material over and over again.
Just get the list of materials you need and the corresponding plants and call the BAPI for each of them.
Also do a run-time analysis (tcode SE30) to check exactly what slows down your program.
regards. -
ATP Check for Components for Variant Configuration
Hi Gurus,
Does it exist a way to perform the ATP Check for components (in variant configuration) like in a test?
I mean, I know that when I create a SO (with the correct settings) the system will perform the ATP Check for components (Missing parts list). But is it possible to do this without trying to create the SO? Maybe a tcode as CU50 or PMEVC where I could enter the variant configuration values, then it explodes the BOM and do the ATP Check (as a simulation).
Thanks in advance.
Best regards.Hi Christopher,
If you enable the "Component Availability" within your configuration profile (under Confign initial screen, Confign Parameters), then you will see an additional option within CU50 while configuring. By pressing this button, you can see an availability check as of the date specified on the CU50 initial screen. You can also modify the quantity on the CU50 initial screen for a more realistic simulation of a sales order (where a customer may order more than one of a product). See screenshots below:
In CU42:
In Value Assignment of CU50:
Hope this helps! -
ATP check for batch managed products
Hello All,
I have a requirement for ATP check for batch managed products and would be glad if someone can help me on that. One of the characteristics on my product is expiry date. Business wants to restricts confirming products which has an expiry date of less than 90 days for orders outside the country. How can we achieve that?Hello
You can try with activating Shelf Life Expiration Date (SLED).
For config, check SPRO - Logistice General - Batch master - SLED
Then finally setup Customer Exit to calculate/check the SLED.
Exit EXIT_SAPLMHD1_001 for enhancement SAPLMHD1.
Further, you can refer following SDN thread for reference/understanding:
- SLED by customer/ material
Regards
JP -
Collective ATP check for production orders
Hi Gurus,
I tried the MDVP tcode, but I can only do the collective ATP check for planned orders. we wanted to do the collective check with production orders, can you tell me how I can do this?
Thanks.I've posted this question but didn't get any response. Can some one please give me an idea how to do the collective ATP check for production orders.
Thanks
Vijaya -
ATP check for CRM Orders using ECC is creating a replication problem
Hi Guys,
I have created an order in CRM and it replicated to ECC,however the issue is I'm unable to change the order any more in CRM, message "Document is being distributed". I'm getting this issue after activating ATP check for CRM -ATP check is working perfectly.
Before this ATP check, the Order replication was working perfectly and i can do the changes to order in both systems.
In advance many thanks for your your help.
Thanks and Regards
SRIMhI,
Thanks for your response,
There are no messages in the middleware (smq2 - q1), but this error only started occurring after I activated the ATP check.
I have also checked the incompletion log at ECC - document is completed.
Before this ATP check activation the order replication was working correct/y and i can do changes at both ECC and CRM. But now even if i change the order in ECC those changes are not getting replicated infact queue is not getting generated.
BDOC is showing sent to receivers (not all confirmed) BUS_TRANS_MSG.
Thanks and Regards
srikanth -
APO ATP - ATP Check for batch stock
Hi experts
We have an interesting scenario on which i dont have much exposure. The client promises stock from specific batches. eg. a particular sales order can only be confirmed from a specific batch. The details of the batch is provided on the sales order. Is there a way that GATP addresses this requirement. If yes then can someone please share the config details to set up such a scenario.
Thank You
Rajiv SarinHi Rajiv,
Let me know if you could discover this. This could be oft required function in GATP. But i presume the batch determination (automatic-FIFO, LIFO etc) would precede the availability check and hence subsequent processes of delivery and PGI would have to "honour" it physically as well once confiemed on order.. If e.g. RF trasactions are used and batch numbers at HU or item level are scanned, then it would be impossible for picking to happen as this lends itself as sure case of physical inventory violation.
I imagine a whole lot of developments of GATP esp. considering customers expectations wrt. "variants (not a in VC-CA)", "make (e.g any 3 models of phones available for same price with a connection)", "regular/gift pack", "age(2002 make motorbike)" etc. even if to begin with they dont make different saleable, plannable, traceable or accoutable products..they only make some extra options (maintained nowhere in the system) available for some historical reasons. Its also likely that for the same order partial quantities are confirmed at different locations (using MLATP).. e.g. regional DC, factory, retail outlet or some other private retailer (sales order converting itself partially to a purchase order) with or without consolidation.
Also likely are options wrt customer delievry locations (ship to parties) that again lends a strong business case to make full use of advanced availablity checks, consolidation(at original location of check), automatic STO's being trigerred to a given location, MISL (the best possible consolidation location),.. and bring in the concept of ATP optimizer (cost based) or MAD based (due date based) and an ATP strategy. (much more complex then rule strategy) in a sense that there is a lot of value to be "unlocked" with some creative order promising that would lend itself to complete line and order fill rate even when there appears to be little scope of fulfilling it. Here comes the role of customer service/self service to let customers convince themselves with better options., that makes the order serviceable and profitable at the same time.
e.g. In a pure MTO kind of scenario GATP could assume even greater significance with its unique abilities to trigger planned orders and purchase requistions, component and capacity checks. incl. checks at SMI slocations, subcon, component vendors, mfg. plants, and plug itself to entire production schedule just from an ATP check of an end product. This could probably be called Automatic ATP. I am sure SAP has thought on these lines and holds a lot on these lines for future releases.
Regards,
Loknath
Maybe you are looking for
-
Added new fields in vendor master in xk01 but data is not getting saved
Hi experts, To add new fields in vendor master i have followed the following steps : 1.) Appended a structure ZRTGS in LFA1 table with required fields and activated 2.) Added new button in xk01( vendor master ) using spro -> logistics-general -> busi
-
Authentification does not appear
Dear all, have set up the trial version of flash access 2.0. But at the ent I run into a problem: The media I stream into the player does not have an authentification mask. First of all the facts: 1.) I set up the the REferencimplementation of the li
-
Help me transfer my mybook to my new imac
I just bought a new imac and I bought the mybook external hard drive. I do not know how to transfer my information the mybook to my mac. Pleases Help!
-
Validating phone numbers using Yaromat
Hello folks: I am very new in this forum. Can you please tell me how I can use Yaromat to validate phone numbers? I see that it validates dates, email, text fields, numeric etc.... but how about phone numbers? Please help. Thanks Akani Akani
-
Hi, I'm not sure if its a proper forum for my question but owing to the fact that the data I use come from PowerPivot I decided to post it here. I've been trying to use a named set feature to set columns for my data so it'd show: budget, actual, diff