ATP check KP

Hello All,
The Availability Check "KP" defined on MRP 3 which suppose to trigger no check in standard SAP. brings a question in my mind.
while running transaction CO09 SD Cheking rule "A" , it says that "Material not Relevant for check, therefore always available"
but when creating a Sales Order in VA01, it does the ATP check and gives next day confirmation day
why would KP act in such a way ?
Another question:
Is CO09 only for Trading Goods/ off the shelf Products ? , is VA01 the only place to get the Available date for ETO or MTO products?
Regards

Hi Dilip,
As you said with the KP availibily check system system will not do the avalibility check for material.Thats true & in CS09 it will say that Material not relevant to check, therefore always available.
why because in the Availibility check control we are not checking any field relevant for Availability check & Checking Rule A signifies that for the sales order system will not do any Availability check.
As you are saying about ATP check for VA01 that system will no do if the Availability check is set KP . But system will calculate the Shipping Time ,loading time & factory calender to give the confirm delivery date.
see even if u have Material Availbale with you but you need to manage the Transport for that , u need a time for pick,-pack if relevant for packing, u need to ckeck the holidays of you & customer also based on that system will confim you the date of delivery.
I can might miss some parts but this is as per my understaning for Availability check..
I hope i am able to explain you...
Regards
Deepak

Similar Messages

ATP check for materials and ATP Confirmed Qty's

Good morning,
I have a question regarding the ATP.
If I have a 100 of box a in stock and I have 2 Planned Orders for 75 (total req on box is 150).
When I convert the first Planned Ord to a Prodution Ord, the ATP check will run and confirm that I have the 75 boxes required (as we want it), but if I then convert the second Planned Order I would expect the ATP to say that only 25 is available, but it is also telling me that the 75 boxes required are available.
Can I set the ATP to confirm/allocate the first 75 boxes to the first Production Order and when the second order runs ATP to only commit to 25?
Thanks in advance.
ATP novice :o)

Hi Guy Hall,
Please check with, "include dependent reservation and production order" has been activated for checking rule used for production order at "avilabilty checking scope"
Regards
Pradeep

Re: ATP check at storage location level.

Hi All,
NEED urgent help.
I want to know if it is posiible to have ATP check at storage location level only.
I do not want this check to happen at plant level.
Please reply.
Thanks and regards,
Nilesh

Hi Shankar,
Storage location is defaulted in sales order.
Can you tell me if there is any user exit for ATP wherein I can carry out the ATP at storage location level and not at plant level.
Thanks and regards,
Nilesh

Re: ATP check at storage location level in sales order.

Hi ,
I have a requirement wherein storage location is determined in my sales order, the ATP check is done at plant level as well as storage location level , and the smaller of the two quantities is taken as the result of the ATP check.
My requirement is that the ATP check should only be performed at storage location level .
Please suggest if there is any standard setting available in SAP.
iF NO , PLEASE SUGGEST SUITABLE USER EXIT, WHERE I can add my requirement.
Regards,
Nilesh

Hi Nilesh,
in SAP standard the system is always checking on plant level first and then on the storage location level, there is no possibility to change this behaviour.
I'm also not sure if the process is correct, because if you have also requirements on plant level only then you would create negative ATP if you confirm on storage location level even though there is no ATP on plant level.
I'm also not aware of a user-exit that would suite your requirement, additionally according to the IMG documentation the user-exits in the availability check area should only be carried out in agreement with SAP.
Regards,
Markus

Relationship about ATP check and credit check

Dear all,
          At present, we have credit control in sales order. The rule is : once the sales order's amount over 1 dollar, the order will be blocked for credit check. This order has to release credit block manually in VKM4.
          Here has a problem, when a sales order has credit released with the status "D", if i check ATP for one item in this order, the credit status will return to "B", it is not match our requirement.
          How can the credit status not change when ATP check happen in the sales order?
         Thanks in advance!

Hi Irene,
You can copy this requirement with new code like :
IF yvbuk-cmgst = 'D'.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-SECURITY.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-STATIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DYNAMIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DOCUMENTVALUE.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-CRITICAL_FIELDS.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-REVIEWDATE.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-OPEN_ITEMS.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-OLDEST_OP.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DUNNING_LEVEL.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER1.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER2.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER3.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-STATIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DYNAMIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DOCUMENTVALUE.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-CRITICAL_FIELDS.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-REVIEWDATE.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-OPEN_ITEMS.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-OLDEST_OP.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DUNNING_LEVEL.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER1.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER2.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER3.
    EXIT.
ENDIF.
If you are a problem with yvbuk-cmgst, you can use user exit MV45AFZZ to save the credit status (cmgst) into an other field.
This new field is checked in the new requirement.
This requirement deactivates the credit check if the credit status is released. In this case, no credit check is possible in SO.
Regards,
Lionel

Edit postDelete postReport this postReply with quote ATP check but the comm

hi , all guys :
when I create the pp-pi order , first i use the batch determination to allocate the component
batch , then i do the ATP check , but the committed quantity always is zero ,the ATP alway does
not support confirm quantity (co09 the confirm quantity always is zero),so when i create the other pp-pi order the stock quantity always cover the reqirements quantity of components
in the mater data , i use the ATP group is 02 (the customizing is standard) i think the ATP scope is irrelative to this issue .
in the order type control parameters , i use the ATP check
for example :
the componet 100-200 have three batchs :
batch: 20100501 quantity 30 kg
batch: 20100502 quantity 40 kg
batch: 20100601 quantity 40 kg
now , the requirment of component 100-200 is 100 kg
the batch determination conditions is self expiration .
so i throght the batch determination and batch split to allocate the bacth and quantity is
batch: 20100501 quantity 30 kg
batch: 20100502 quantity 40 kg
batch: 20100601 quantity 30 kg
after allocating , i run the ATP check ,BUT the COMMITED QUANTITY ALWAYS IS ZERO .
I don't know why !!! ,where can configure the ATP confirm quantities (committed quantities) the in the customizing
can you give help me!!!
thanks!!!
best regards

Davis:
Check in MRP Group settings, Availability Check session, flag activate full confirmation logic. Test activate full confirmation logic.
Regards,
Ricardo

ATP check active when creating sales order - want to deactivate

Hello experts,
at the time we created a sales order, the checking group for availability check in the master data of an article was "02" (Individual requirements). However, this was a master data error, as the correct setting for this article is "KP" (No check). We have changed this setting in the article master, but now we have a problem with the delivery, as we can not confirm the required quantity in the desired date. The ATP check says we have no availability (based on the wrong master data existing during the creation of the order), but we need to override this check.
Is ther any way of "overriding" the ATP check of the article in our sales order, thus taking into account the "KP" (no check) setting?
Thank you very much in advance.
Kind regards.
Marcos

Have you actually created the delivery yet? If not, you can use the following path to deactivate the ATP check during delivery:
> SPRO
> Logistics Execution
    > Availability Check & Transfer of Requirements
      > Availability Check
        > Determine procedure for Each Delivery Item Category
Perhaps turning of the ATP check temporarily shall help overcome the issue.

ATP check in the Sale order Processing and CO06 transaction (Confirm Qty)

Hi All,
While creating the Sale order, After performing the ATP check and saving the document i have called an user exit to make the confirmed Quantity equal to ZERO when the delivery block is set (As requested by customer). That is working fine...
But the same confirmed Quantity of ZERO is not reflecting in CO06 transaction. Its showing the old value that the value before setting the delivery block.
I have identified the table VBBE-VMENG which stores the confirmed quantity in CO06 transaction...
Could you please help me know any USER EXITS or any other solution to change the confirmed quantity to ZERO in CO06 transaction also while delivery block is set in the sale order.
Thanks &Regards,
Navaneeth

Hi All,
Please help me by providing some clues on this issue...
Regards,
Navaneeth

ATP Check against customer stock for return Sale order

Hi Friends,
Pl.help in this.
1. Is it possible to configure ATP check against Customer stock in a Sale order/Return order/any other way? ( Actuallly, client wants to take back empty cylinders through return sale order by ATP check against the customer stock)
Regards,
Mani

Hi Mani ,
Are you taking cylinder as returable packing item or not?
ex- For soft drinks or beverages industry it pretty common , they use thel returnable package material type and more over why you want use return sales order for this?
Note- Just plz explain scenario to MM and PP People also as availability check with all combination
Hope it is helpful to you,
Regards
Venkat

SD- Sales Order - ATP check not working for few item in same sales order

Hi Experts,
Need help we activated ATP check but for few item i could not find confirmation qty after availability check. In same SO out of 4 items for schedule line it confirming qty for 2 item but it's not confirming for remaining 2 items though stock is available. Please guide me how to correst and what need to check.
Manoj

Dear Manoj,
As you know, ATP is a big subject & some times its difficult to point the exact problem.
In your case, I suggest you to execute the function module:BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY using Tx:SE37
key in selection criteria , in results check the "ATPQTY"- it will show you how much actual stock is available for use i.e. ATP qtty.
still if you find the availability & system not confirming the qtty, then problem could be in checking rule
Tx:OVZ9 check in relevant combination, whether you are considering RLT or not?
is this case with MTS or MTO
because in Sales order -
for MTS - checking rule "A" & MTO checking rule will be "AE"
Regards,
Reazuddin MD

Questions on ATP Check, RLT & Planning

Hi,
I have a couple of issues regarding ATP checks and Planning, and I was wondering if anyone could help.
1. We have a setup right now where we are using standard SAP availability check with Replenishment Lead time. In the Purchasing, we might have scenarios where some Purchase orders are indefintely delayed from the Vendors and this has to be reflected in the sales order.
We tried doing that by setting the delivery date in the PO to 31.12.9999 but since the date lies outside of the RLT, the sales order is fully confirmed and the delay in purchasing is not reflected in the sales order. Do you have any suggestions on how we could get around this without deactivating RLT?
2. We have a requirement right now of using the Planned delivery time in the Material master as working days instead of Calendar days for planning purposes. Any proposal on how that can be done?
3. We also have a requirement of taking the 'ordering calendar' into account for planning as well as for availability check - the ordering calendar is basically a weekly schedule when the POs are created and sent out to the Vendor. As an example we have a material with Planned delivery time as 3 days and GR Processing time as 1 day. However, we send the PO to this Vendor only on every Thursday.
When the sales order is placed on Friday, using RLT the Sales order will be confirmed for Tuesday next week, but the PO will not even be sent to the Vendor till Thursday next week and we end up giving incorrect confirmations to the customers. Is there any way that this 'ordering calendar' could be taken into account in the Availability check.
Hope someone can help.

Hi arnab
one way of achieving your requirements is
after creating the sales order you can execute the SALEs order MRP using MD50 transaction enter the order # and MRP control parameters 1,3,1,2. and execute.
Ensure the following before MRP.
1. All the master data are maintained for the schedule line creation for the components ( Source list, Scheduling agreements)
2. Material master with valid MRP data.strategy group having MTO strategy.
after sales order MRP you will get the schedule line created for the components
also MRp will create the cpacity requirements as we run the MRP with Lead time scheduling.
Hope this helps
SK
Reward your points

ATP check for inbound EDI order

Hi Friends,
When I am creating outbound sales order then ATP check is getting executed properly & multiple schedule lines are getting creating in IDOC also (depending on the avaibility of stock).
But When I am trying to create the inbound sales order via EDI/IDOC there is no ATP check performed & multiple schedule lines are not getting created in sales order(as per the avaibility of stock which I am checkin thro So09 tcode).
ANy1 has faced smilier problem in past. If yes then please let me know how to solve this problem of ATP check.
PLease let me know as soon as possible.
Many thanks in advance
Br, Prashant

HI Frndz,
problem is solved by using following customizing settings
Customizing:
SD/function/requirement availability/availability check/default (OVZJ)
Change the field "Rule availability" to the required value. You receive a list of the possible values using the possible entries pushbutton. Rescheduling is regarded as background processing. If you want to allow partial deliveries, choose the value 'E'.

Retaining the old schedule lines after the ATP check in the sales order....

Hi Experts,
I would like to retain the old schedule lines after the ATP/GATP check in the sales order for certain conditions.
I don't want to change XVBEP,IVBEP,VBEP contents in the user-exit..
Is there any standard sub-routine or function module to reatain old schedule lines in the sales order so that the schedule lines will not update with the new values after the ATP check ?
Thanks
Rayudu

In Include LV03VFMM, you have:
* Userexit availability
PERFORM USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_IN USING DA_ATPPR.
There may be an option to implement some logic in here. However, I tried changing the value of MVERF_POS-EINTEIL[1]-VFPKZ to initial. This will ensure that when FM AVAILABILITY_CHECK_CONTROLLER is called that the following IF statement is untrue:
CHECK NOT P_ATPCSX[] IS INITIAL.
as P_ATPCSX[] Table[0x648].....
However, this will just mean that the 2nd confirmed schedule line (assuming we have > 1 schedule lines) will have a confirmed quantity to zero.
EXIT_SAPLATPC_001 could also be used. However, when I removed the "X" from CHKFLG, I get the same result; the 2nd schedule line will revert to zero.
They were the only tests I tried; I cannot think of any other ways around this....

How to delete confirmed schedule lines, without executing the ATP check?

Sales and Distribution: Concerning ATP (product allocation)
Situation:
Step 1: An order is created with priority low. Quantities are confirmed for line items.
Step 2: A second order is created with a higher priority. No confirmed quantities.
Rescheduling program (SDV03V02) is then executed. This selects and sorts the orders in the correct order.
The confirmed quantities for the first (low priority) order should now be freed up, to be able to allocate those quantities to the second (high priority) order.
The problem I am facing is that the confirmed quantities are NOT released.
We cannot use BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE or SD_SALESDOCUMENT_CHANGE to delete or modify the schedule lines, because these function modules execute the ATP check again. And when that happens, quantities are again confirmed and assigned.
How can we get rid of the confirmed schedule lines, without executing the ATP check?
Thanks,
Edwin.

Found a solution to the problem:
In the Rescheduling program we export a parameter to the memory, to make it possible to delete schedule lines without executing the ATP check.
Deleting of the schedule lines is done with a BAPI, which will call the ATP check automatically for ATP relevant materials. This we want to stop from happening (only when calling the BAPI).
After the BAPI has been called we FREE the MEMORY ID.
The parameter is imported again in Customer-Exit EXIT_SAPLATPC_001.
Transaction.. SMOD
Enhancement.. ATP00001
Component.... EXIT_SAPLATPC_001,
Include...... ZXATPU01.
The customer exit is used in function AVAILABILITY_CHECK_CONTROLLER, just before calling function 'AVAILABILITY_CHECK'.
Simply refreshing the ATP tables in the customer-exit, will prevent the ATP check from being executed (because we removed the list containing the materials for which the ATP check needs to be done). As a result, the function 'AVAILABILITY_CHECK' will not be processed.

ATP Check at Delivery Level instead of Sales Order

In Standard SAP, whenever a sales order is created the ATP check is done and a Goods movement 601 is done for it and gets blocked.
I want that no movement to be carried out at Sales Order Level and should get blocked only at the Delivery level, instead of Sales order.
Can i do this by not defining any movement type in the schedule line category attached to the Item category of the sales order.

hi amit,
u cannot remove MT assignment to SLCAT ,but what you can do is for your checking group and checking rule remove the ATP check relevancy in requirement class defination in spro customising >sd>availibility and TOR.
so that in VOV4 transaction for your SLCAT atp will be deactivated.
only while posting material doc at the time of PGI system would check for availibility and block the goods movement.
reward if helps !!!!!

ATP Check in Sales Order

I have the following problem:
I am working on a custom ATP check for the Internet Sales Order. I am looking for the user exit or maybe a place when the ATP check is triggered for both cases:
1 initial material is entered and is checked in which plant is available of the requested quantity by ATP check
2. when the delivery date (First Date) on the item level is changed to the future date.
any ideas are welcomed. will award points.
Edited by: Maksims Jegorovcevs on Feb 6, 2009 4:06 PM

Hi,
You can try the following user exits;
EXIT_SAPLATPC_001 - Processing Requirements Table Before Calling Actual Check
EXIT_SAPLATPC_002 - Processing Results of Actual Check
For your second question, when the delivery date of the line item is changed, the system itself will do automatic ATP check. Also in transaction OVZ2, for the checking group, you can use the field accumulation (value 3) for availability check with accumulation and confirmed quantities.
Regards,

ATP check KP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for