ATP check settings for pl. order: condition on ShipNt Dates
Dear All,
Do you know is there a way to setup ATP check to include Shipping Notification sent from vendors, BUT with condition that such ShipNts should be taken into account ONLY if confirmed dates are not more then X days from planned/production order basic start dates.
regards, Andrey
Dear,
I think it is not possible in standard SAP. I will suggest you post the tread in SD general forum for better reply.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Similar Messages
-
ATP checking rule for PM order
Hi friends,
How do I check which ATP rule is being used for Plant maintainence order (PM) order. Using Tcode IW41 we create PM order and do the goods movement type 261.
Error: I have an item ABC with quantity 1 and there exists a deliver for this 1 unit. Still, I am able to issue this part to PM order which should not happen.
Please advise .
SruthiSPRO->PM and CS->Maintenance and service processing->Maintenance and service orders->Functions and settings for order type->Availabilty check for material, PRTs and capacity
-
Is ATP check possible in Service Order for Sales Item?
Hi All,
My question, is ATP check possible in Service Order for Sales Item? My requirement is that when i create a service order in the web UI with a sales item and drill down to the item level, i see the schedule lines assignment block but w/o any Confirming date, so i want to know whether the ATP check is happening or not. For example wen i create a sales order in web UI with a sales item and drill down into the item level, the schedule line AB shows me the Confirming date checking the ATP. But this is not happening in case of service order. So kindly suggest the reason and clarify my query. Thanks
Regards
SrideviNobody can help me???
Please.
Thanks -
ATP check with including puchase order
when we create SO with ATP check to reserve the qty of the currenct stock, we also want to know the future qty of purchase orders so that we can clearly know the supply and demand of these materials.
so we use ATP check with including purchase order, that users can reserve the qty of open GR purchase orders.
but when the status of that PO changed, the reserved qty before won't have effect, and can't create outbound delivery either.
there are two examples below:
1. there is one SO reserved 10 material qty of the open GR PO, which it's scheduled delivery date is 5/15. but this PO still hasn't goods receipt until 5/17, cause ATP check rule is "Include future receipts only" ( if "Receipts in the past as well as in the future" is set, it will be confused with current stock qty), so these 10 qty won't have effect and the ATP qty is now a negative. we should only reserve again by t-code V_V2, otherwise all the reserved qty can't be deliveried.
2.there is one SO reserved 10 material qty of the open GR PO, which it's scheduled delivery date is 5/15, but when the delivery date of confirms tab is updated by vendor, these reserved qty before will also be invalid.
please tell me how to resolve these problems?Hi,
If the business wants to confirm the sales order quantity against the incoming purchase orders, then this always happen. The issue can be resolved only by rescheduling the sales order by running V_V2 everyday.
Alternatively you can suggest the business to exclude the purchase order from availabilty check(AC) in t.code OVZ9 and include shipping notification in it. When the vendor sends some materials confirmation, the purchasing can add the shipping notificatoin details in the purchase order and can create Inbound deliveries for goods receipt. By this way, only when the vendor ships the goods, the quantity will be taken into AC.
Regards, -
What are the settings for rework order quality inspection
HI,
Iam doing production order confirmation at the GR time some oprations are rejected.that operations i want too rework order CO07 process without GR ,i want to Quality inspection in REWork order.
What are the settings for rework order Quality inspection?Refer beautiful document
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/HOME/ReworkInProduction -
Checking Rule for Process Order
Hi Guys
I am using the standard checking rule for Process Order while releasing. This rule considers the quality blocked stock also as available stock and thus release the Process Order.
However the client does not want to include the quality block stock for process order. My question is:
1. If I create a checking rule which does not consider quality stock as available, and attach it to release of Process Order, will it make any change in MRP run?
2. Is there a means to show a warning message while release of process order to show the stock is in quality block state?
3. Is there any other means to alarm or warn the user before release of Process order about the material quality block state?
Appreciate you help / suggestion on this
Thanks in advance
RahulHi,
Regards the stocks during MRP run, you can do it in tow areas
1. In OPPI, you can define whether Stockin transfer/blocked/restricted stocks can be taken into account for MRP run.
2. You can exclude storage locations in MRP run and assign the MRP storage location indicator as 1 in MRP 4 view.
Apart from this the MRP will consider all stocks and requirements.
If you don't want to consider QI stock (for ex) then you can convert them as blocked stocks or you can move to a storage location which is not assigned to the MRP.
Thanks,
JK -
Difference in Material availability date for ECC ATP check & for APO ATP check in the same order
Hi Gurus,
I have a question: on what basis material availability date is calculated in forward scheduling?
Eg:
For a customer GR hours are maintained in unloading point calendar in customer master and Customers are not CIF'ed across to APO.
GR hours are maintained for weekdays from 8:00 to 12:00 & 1:00 to 6:00.
In a sales order with two line items with Requested date today & plenty of stock on hand for two products( ECC & APO) where line 10 (product 1) triggers ECC ATP check & line 20 (product 2) triggers APO ATP check at same location (loc1).
RDD is today, material availability date for ECC ATP check (line 10) is today (working as expected) but where as the material availability date for APO ATP check (line 20)is pushed to next day by which for the same customer there are different delivery dates. And two delivery notes will be created & truck will be on road at different times for the same customer which is unacceptable.
What am I missing here to get the material availability date as today for forward scheduling? Please guide me on this.
Thanks,
NiharHi Nihar
Though the logic you mentioned makes sense. I am confused here with the data you have provided:
UTC day
UTC time
CET day
CET time
UTC+6 day
UTC+6 time
RDD
30/04
17:24
30/04
7:24
30/04
23:24
MAD
30/04
17:24
30/04
7:24
30/04
23:24
Lod/GI
02/05
17:24
02/05
7:24
02/05
23:24
Del
12/05
17:24
12/05
7:24
12/05
23:24
Del
13/05
1:00
13/05
3:00
13/05
8:00
Load/GI
05/05
1:00
05/05
3:00
05/05
8:00
MAD
02/05
1:00
02/05
3:00
02/05
8:00
In the first row, the difference in RDD in UTC and UTC+6 is 6 hours. However, in the last three rows I can see the difference between UTC time and UTC+6 time is 7 hours. Would you know the reason to this? Also, in the first four rows, CET time = 7:24 which should had been 19:24. Please correct me if I am missing something here.
Thanks,
Parth Soneji -
Hi Experts,
I would like to retain the old schedule lines after the ATP/GATP check in the sales order for certain conditions.
I don't want to change XVBEP,IVBEP,VBEP contents in the user-exit..
Is there any standard sub-routine or function module to reatain old schedule lines in the sales order so that the schedule lines will not update with the new values after the ATP check ?
Thanks
RayuduIn Include LV03VFMM, you have:
* Userexit availability
PERFORM USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_IN USING DA_ATPPR.
There may be an option to implement some logic in here. However, I tried changing the value of MVERF_POS-EINTEIL[1]-VFPKZ to initial. This will ensure that when FM AVAILABILITY_CHECK_CONTROLLER is called that the following IF statement is untrue:
CHECK NOT P_ATPCSX[] IS INITIAL.
as P_ATPCSX[] Table[0x648].....
However, this will just mean that the 2nd confirmed schedule line (assuming we have > 1 schedule lines) will have a confirmed quantity to zero.
EXIT_SAPLATPC_001 could also be used. However, when I removed the "X" from CHKFLG, I get the same result; the 2nd schedule line will revert to zero.
They were the only tests I tried; I cannot think of any other ways around this.... -
ATP Check issue for storage location level
Hi Experts:
I met a problem when carry out the ATP check, when I create the SO for material A 1 pcs and not maintain the storage location in sales order, ATP carried out and gave me the proposal delivery date(100 days later) for about this material, the system can not check the storage location level.
the real situation is for material A, in stock 1000 has 100 pcs, in stock 2000 has 50 pcs, and in stock 3000 has 30 pcs.
How can the system automatic check the storage location level even I not fill in the storage location in the sales order?
Thanks and best regards
JinJin,
For this check
1)Youe storage location shd be automatically determined..Make sure you've done all settings in 0vlk/0vlp..
2)In MMR-MRP2 make sure you have entered Prod Storage Location..Also in OVZ9 check what stocks you have selected for ATP for particular check rule..
3)Also in VA02 Go to Environment-Availability overview..
REWARD IF U FINDS THIS AS HELPFUL..
Regds
MM -
Re ATP check in the Sales order
Hi,
I have one strange issue in SO ATP check. I have created a SO and it was cofirmed with Availability check:XX, which was maintained in material master when the SO was created. Then I changed the Avail check to YY and did the Re-ATP check again in SO, but the system takes the old Avail check:XX.
It takes the new Avail check if I create a new line item in the SO, but did not work for the exisitng line item.
Regards
Nagarajan.Hi Nagarajan,
The master data changes will effect only for the future entries not for the already entered material in the sale order or any other transaction -
ATP check in the Sale order Processing and CO06 transaction (Confirm Qty)
Hi All,
While creating the Sale order, After performing the ATP check and saving the document i have called an user exit to make the confirmed Quantity equal to ZERO when the delivery block is set (As requested by customer). That is working fine...
But the same confirmed Quantity of ZERO is not reflecting in CO06 transaction. Its showing the old value that the value before setting the delivery block.
I have identified the table VBBE-VMENG which stores the confirmed quantity in CO06 transaction...
Could you please help me know any USER EXITS or any other solution to change the confirmed quantity to ZERO in CO06 transaction also while delivery block is set in the sale order.
Thanks &Regards,
NavaneethHi All,
Please help me by providing some clues on this issue...
Regards,
Navaneeth -
ATP,confirm quantity for Purchase Order related Sales Order
Hi everybody,
I have purchase requisition related sales order item. I created purchase order with this PR.
I entry confirmation date and quantity on the PO.
Sales order item's delivery date equal to purchase order item's confirmation date.
Sales order item's confirmed quantity eq purchase order item's confirmed quantity. It is ok for me.
But, goods receipt not do yet for this purchase order and sales order stock = 0.
If I run VL10N for this sales order, I can create delivery.
I wants to see availilable sales order stock item on the VL10N items. How can I see?
or
If no goods receipt for sales order items then sales order item confirmed quantity can equal 0. How can I do?
Best regards
Gulay CelikHi
You can meet your requirement in multiple ways
1) Modify the requirement routine for copy control from Sales order to Delivery that DO not create the delivery for third party orders unless the GR is posted for the respective sales order.
2) IF you have implementded Inbound Delivey functionality in your system, You can change the availabiltity situation every time you modify the GR dates and times. Modify the PO user exit that when ever a new confirmation Key LA is entered in the purchase order it goes and updates the schdule line dates and quantities in the order based on the dates entered in the LA confirmation key.
and even if delivey gets created also what is the problem ? The GI cannot be posted though unlsess there is sufficient stock. -
Settings for Purchase Order output using services for MM-SUS scenario?
Dear Gurus,
I am configuring the service procurement classic and plan driven procurement for MM-SUS
environment. We are on SAP SRM 7.01/ECC 6 EHP5.
I need to maintain the below settings for PO output:
1. RUN transaction SWETYPV
2. IN the object types field, enter CL_SE_PUR_WF_OUT.
3. In the event field, enter CREATED.
4. In the receiver type field, enter WS53800008.
5. In the receiver function module field, enter SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT_IBF.
6. Select the 'Linkage Activated' checkbox.
7. Save your entries.
Similarly, one more entry for the event CHANGED.
However, the system is not allowing me to save the settings.
If I choose BOR Object Type 'CL_SE_PUR_WF_OUT', it gives an error message 'Object type CL_SE_PUR_WF_OUT is not defined'.
If I choose object category 'Business class for object type CL_SE_PUR_WF_OUT, it gives an error message 'Class CL_SE_PUR_WF_OUT is not a business class.'
There are similar entries in the table SWETYPV for object type CL_SE_PUR_PO_WF_OUT' with object category CL.If we copy the entries and tries to replace the
object type 'CL_SE_PUR_PO_WF_OUT' with CL_SE_PUR_WF_OUT and save it, it gives an error message 'CL is not used for workflow event'.
Could you please help me on how to configure the settings for PO output from ECC system using services?
Any input is highly appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
RanjanHi Ranjan,
Please add the value 'CL' in the table SWF_CATIDS
Then it will work.
With Regards,
Malay -
Inspection lot settings for customer order returns
Hi
The course material for CS states the following :-
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The serviceable item undergoes a technical check when the goods receipt is
Posted(repair orders) . You can use inspection lots in Quality Management in the technical check. The system automatically generates an inspection lot for the technical check for a returns goods receipt. <The system does this if you have made the corresponding settings in the material master of the serviceable item.>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
what settings are required & where in the material master ?
Thanks
Edited by: Isabelle Britten on May 7, 2008 12:08 PMYou must have the 05 inspection type activated in the material master. You'll find this in the QM view of the material. Click on the button labelled "insp. setup".
In the next screen add inspection type 05. Make sure the "Active" box is clicked on at the end of the record line.
Craig -
What color settings are best when ordering Aperture 3 books? I want to prevent photos that are printed too dark. Last year, Apple advised calibrating to 2.2 gamma setting. cr
zasa:
Use the largest file, pixel wise, that you can. The books are printed at 300 dpi so the largest size the better to insure you'll get as close to that dpi for the largest page picture possible.
Do you Twango?
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've written an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.
Maybe you are looking for
-
No more Facebook contacts after update
Hi, As I was experiencing Facebook connection issues the last week, I updated Skype to the 7.5.64.101 version. After I'm asked to sign in on Facebook on Skype Start I get this message: Facebook friends on Skype To chat with friends on Facebook, simpl
-
Xfinity Video Online keeps crashing and giving me error on other attempts.
Here is a common message I keep getting while trying to load a show on Xfinity online: An error occurred while processing your request.Reference #97.55f64317.1436221249.155e7e48 *On occasion, the video will start but then will crash at various points
-
Getting error in Portal "Error while generating the PDF" for BI Report
Hi Experts, we are gettign the error while trying to generate the PDF file from the Reports. Earlier it was working fine Adobe Reader 8 , currently we have upgrated Adobe Reader 9 in our system. After this upggradation browser "*Failed to open PDF in
-
Hi! I am getting the error: "The startup disk cannot be partitioned or restored to a single partition. The startup disk must be formatted as a single Mac OS Extended (Jounraled) volume or already partitioned by Boot Camp Assistant for installing Win
-
Newsstand – completely wrecked by iOS 8
I was experiencing a problem using Newsstand on my iPad 2under iOS7. Once launched, it wouldn't quit. While I could multitouch my way to other apps, the Home screen was unavailable so I had to restart to use the iPad properly again. I was advised to