ATP check with including puchase order

when we create SO with ATP check to reserve the qty of the currenct stock, we also want to know the future qty of purchase orders so that we can clearly know the supply and demand of these materials.
so we use ATP check with including purchase order, that users can reserve the qty of open GR purchase orders.
but when the status of that PO changed, the reserved qty before won't have effect, and can't create outbound delivery either.
there are two examples below:
1. there is one SO reserved 10 material qty of the open GR PO, which it's scheduled delivery date is 5/15. but this PO still hasn't  goods receipt until 5/17, cause ATP check rule is "Include future receipts only" ( if "Receipts in the past as well as in the future" is set, it will be confused with current stock qty), so these 10 qty won't have effect and the ATP qty is now a negative. we should only reserve again by t-code V_V2, otherwise all the reserved qty can't be deliveried.
2.there is one SO reserved 10 material qty of the open GR PO, which it's scheduled delivery date is 5/15, but when the delivery date of confirms tab is updated by vendor, these reserved qty before will also be invalid.
please tell me how to resolve these problems?

Hi,
If the business wants to confirm the sales order quantity against the incoming purchase orders, then this always happen. The issue can be resolved only by rescheduling the sales order by running V_V2 everyday.
Alternatively you can suggest the business to exclude the purchase order from availabilty check(AC)  in t.code OVZ9 and include shipping notification in it. When the vendor sends some materials confirmation, the purchasing can add the shipping notificatoin details in the purchase order and can create Inbound deliveries for goods receipt. By this way, only when the vendor ships the goods, the quantity will be taken into AC.
Regards,

Similar Messages

  • ATP check settings for pl. order: condition on ShipNt Dates

    Dear All,
    Do you know is there a way to setup ATP check to include Shipping Notification sent from vendors, BUT with condition that such ShipNts should be taken into account ONLY if confirmed dates are not more then X days from planned/production order basic start dates.
    regards, Andrey

    Dear,
    I think it is not possible in standard SAP. I will suggest you post the tread in SD general forum for better reply.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Is ATP check possible in Service Order for Sales Item?

    Hi All,
    My question, is ATP check possible in Service Order for Sales Item? My requirement is that when i create a service order in the web UI with a sales item and drill down to the item level, i see the schedule lines assignment block but w/o any Confirming date, so i want to know whether the ATP check is happening or not. For example wen i create a sales order in web UI with a sales item and drill down into the item level, the schedule line AB shows me the Confirming date checking the ATP. But this is not happening in case of service order. So kindly suggest the reason and clarify my query. Thanks
    Regards
    Sridevi

    Nobody can help me???
    Please.
    Thanks

  • Retaining the old schedule lines after the ATP check in the sales order....

    Hi Experts,
    I would like to retain the old schedule lines after the ATP/GATP check in the sales order for certain conditions.
    I don't want to change XVBEP,IVBEP,VBEP contents in the user-exit..
    Is there any standard sub-routine or function module to reatain old schedule lines in the sales order so that the schedule lines will not update with the new values after the ATP check ?
    Thanks
    Rayudu

    In Include LV03VFMM, you have:
    * Userexit availability
          PERFORM USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_IN USING DA_ATPPR.
    There may be an option to implement some logic in here. However, I tried changing the value of MVERF_POS-EINTEIL[1]-VFPKZ to initial. This will ensure that when FM AVAILABILITY_CHECK_CONTROLLER is called that the following IF statement is untrue:
    CHECK NOT P_ATPCSX[] IS INITIAL.
    as P_ATPCSX[]                     Table[0x648].....
    However, this will just mean that the 2nd confirmed schedule line (assuming we have > 1 schedule lines) will have a confirmed quantity to zero.
    EXIT_SAPLATPC_001 could also be used. However, when I removed the "X" from CHKFLG, I get the same result; the 2nd schedule line will revert to zero.
    They were the only tests I tried; I cannot think of any other ways around this....

  • How to configure ATP check for "create standard order in SD (OR type)"

    first, I had check my stock, I only have ten PC
    , but when I enter 100 PC in a OR order, and issue ATP check, it is carries out, why? I had set availavility check into 02 in MRP3 view

    Availability check
    1. Availability check is an integral part of the business process that determines if the required delivery quantity can be met on a required delivery date. For this purpose the system takes into account pre-delivery activities such as scheduling for picking or packing times and the time taken to produce or obtain the material. It also performs several background functions such as Backorder processing, rescheduling and ATP quantities.
    2. Backorder processing: processing of a sales order that has not been fully confirmed or not confirmed at a certain delivery date.
    3. Rescheduling: is a proposal of how u2013 confirmed quantities already assigned to a sales order can be reassigned to other sales orders that have a higher priority.
    4. Available to promise (ATP): is a process of checking the available quantities of a material. The ATP quantity consists of warehouse stock + planned receipts (incoming stock) u2013 planned issues (outgoing stock). to examine stock on hand (CO09) proceed to logistics u2013 sales & distribution u2013 sales u2013 environment u2013 availability overview.
    5. Replenishment lead time (RLT): is the time taken for the material to become available either internally (in house production) or externally (from a vendor). The most important things to consider during an external procurement are purchasing and MRP2 (procurement) views of MMR where the processing time for purchasing, planned delivery time and goods receipt processing time are taken into account. On the other hand internal procurement is based on in house production time (MRP 2 view) goods receipt processing time or alternatively RLT time, which is found on MRP 3 view.
    6. RLT (Replenishment Lead Time) is the time taken for the material to become available. RLT is only used when doing an ATP check (Available To Promise). The value of RLT for a material is specified on material master record.
    7. There are three types of availability checks u2013
    Check on basis of ATP quantities.
    Check against product allocation.
    Check against planning.
    Configuring Availability check through Checking Groups
    1. The checking group + checking rule determine how the availability check is to be performed.
    2. The checking group determines whether and how the system checks the stock availability and generates requirements for material planning. The checking group defines what type of requirements will be passed on i.e. summarized requirements (daily/weekly) or individual requirements for each sales order.
    3. The checking rule applies to how the availability check is to be carried out at the transaction level. Note that you must define checking rules for each individual application such as for production orders for example. In Sales and Distribution, the checking rule is specified internally within the system and cannot be changed.
    4. The checking rule, in conjunction with the checking group, determines the scope of the availability check for every business operation; that is, which stocks, receipts and issues are to be included in the availability check and whether the check is to be carried out with or without the replenishment lead time.
    5. Briefly explaining the above u2013 checking group determines which type of requirement to be passed on to MRP whether it be individual or summarized and checking rule which is at the transaction level and can be configured independently for each application module, determines which stocks, receipts and issues to be taken into account. For performing an availability check checking group has to work in conjunction with checking rule.
    6. Advantages of individual processing over summarized processing u2013
    Backorder processing is possible.
    You can access (MD04) order, line and schedule line individually which gives a greater control on available stock and requirements placed on stock.
    The system automatically uses individual requirements in case of special stock items.
    7. Required data for the Availability check to be carried out u2013
    The Availability check must be switched on at the requirement class level.
    The Availability check must be set at the schedule line level.
    A requirements type must exist by which the requirements class can be found.
    A plant must be defined in the sales order for each schedule line item (in other words plant must be defined for every material in MMR).
    A checking group must be defined in the material master record in the MRP3 screen in the availability check field.
    8. Configuring Availability check and defining Checking Groups u2013
    Checking groups are introduced into the sales order based on the setting in the material master record.
    SAP standard checking groups are 01 u2013 summarized requirements and 02 u2013 individual requirements or you can create your own by copying the standard ones.
    Total sales and total deliveries columns are there to configure a checking rule to sum up requirements to post to MRP either individually or by day or week.
    Block quantity required can be set if you want several users to be able to process the material simultaneously in different transactions without blocking each other.
    The no check indicator is CHECKED when you DO NOT want the system to carry out ATP check.
    9. Defining material block for other users u2013 the block check box is an indicator that enables you to block material master records of a particular material during the availability check and restrict other users from accessing same master record and reserve the material. If the block is not set, two users can confirm the same material at the same time for two different orders, not knowing if the stock is available or not. If you select this field, the material is blocked during the availability check and other users cannot: a) Make changes in the material master record. b) Create purchase orders for the material. C) Create orders for the material.
    10. Defining default values for checking groups - Checking groups are introduced into the sales order based on the setting in the material master record.
    However if there is no entry present in the material master record for the checking group, a default value can be set here, depending on material type and plant.
    This default value will be used by the system depending on the material type mentioned in MMR and plant in sales order.
    If an entry exists, this default value is over written by MMR.
    11. Controlling Availability Check u2013 in this section, you tell the system what stock on hand and what inward and outward movements of stock it must take into account when performing the availability check in addition to whether or not to consider the replenishment lead time.
    12. These settings are based on the checking group that is assigned to the material master record and the checking rule that is predefined and assigned to the sales and distribution transaction.
    13. These settings carry out control both for sales order and delivery as well. This is due to the fact that you may want to include specific stock or incoming stock for the sales order, yet at the time of the delivery only include physical stock on hand waiting to be shipped.
    14. It is possible to indicate to the system that you would like the availability check NOT TO CHECK the stock at the storage location level. This indicator is used to set the scope of the availability check.
    15. It is used to switch off the check at storage location level. You create a reservation for a particular storage location. However, the scope of the availability check is set in such a way as to exclude the storage location. In this case, the system carries out the check at plant level only and does not take the storage location into account that is specified in the reservation.
    16. Should you not want the system to automatically check RLT, you may indicate so here. RLT is the time taken for a material to become available. It is only used when doing an ATP check and is taken from MMR.
    17. defining the elements in the availability check entirely depends on the business needs, but a few tips are given under u2013
    When controlling the Availability check at the time of the sales order, a purchase requisition does not necessarily indicate by it is going to come into the plant.
    A shipping notification on the other hand - a confirmed purchase order u2013 is a good indicator of receiving stock on a specified date.
    It is always recommended not to select the shipping notifications for the delivery requirements type as you may not actually receive the stock into plant or warehouse for which you are creating a delivery.

  • ATP Check with STOs

    Hi All
    Need your help to resolve the following concern in committed date of STOs
    Scenario:
    When a STO is created for a material where the supplying plant has no stock, then the committed date in the delivery schedule lines comes up as 31.12.9999 and the statistical date comes up as the requested delivery date + planned delivery time!
    I guess this is fine as system considers forward scheduling automatically in this case.
    However this order is not considered by BOP as well!
    Now if the stock is produced / made available even then the STO is not getting picked up in BOP
    So this results in inconsistency (APO/R3) and also when the delivery is generated it comes up with error! (wrong quantity / date or '0' qty)
    Now if I manually do the ATP check in the STO line item, it changes the dates. Still it dosent show up in BOP but  delivery can be created!
    Can you guys please advice me what should be the process for such STOs (which were created when there was no stock in supplying plant). As manually doing ATP check isnt sensible.
    Also why is that BOP is not picking up these STOs (I have already checked the parameters and STO is included)
    Thanks in advance
    RK

    RK,
    "Crazy" is a misnomer when dealing with software. The only things in this business that are crazy are the clients.  Unfortunately, they also pay the bills, so you have to live with such insanity.
    According to your error message, you haven't defined 050 / U.  I don't know the entire scenario, but to me this is a red flag that must be addressed regardless of any other steps you take. You must either create these check instructions, or eliminate objects that are calling for this combination.
    I just reviewed my posts, and I don't see any place there where I said I did not create 'U'.  I did say I removed my original BE, which wasn't 'U'.  My original BE for STOs and STPrqs was 'ST'.  I removed this from both R/3 and SCM.  Then I created 'U' in R/3 and 'U' in SCM.
    1.  R/3:  SM30 > view V_441R  Create 'U' Checking Rule.
    2.  R/3: SM30 > view V_441V Create Availability check as necessary using 'U' Check rule and the Availability checks you will be using.
    3.  R/3:  SM30 > view V_161V doc category B  remove your existing check rule and replace with 'U'
    4.  R/3:  SM30 > view V_161V doc category F  Remove your existing check rule and replace with 'U'.
    5.  SCM SM30 > View /SAPAPO/V_ATP02 > Create BE 'U'
    6.  SCM SM30 > View /SAPAPO/V_ATP07 > Remove the existing check instructions for STOs.  Create new check instructions as necessary for STOs, using BE 'U'.
    7.  SCM SM34 > Dialogue /SAPAPO/ATPC04_05 > Remove the existing Check control(s) for STOs.  Add the appropriate Check control items using BE 'U'.
    I don't really know if the 'U' issue is related to your original problem.  I am only responding to the part of your post where you said
    I am getting error:
    Check instruction / U does not exist for location product XXXX / XXXX
    FYI throughout this post, I have been assuming that you have no userexits/BADIs activated, on either side (R/3 nor SCM) nor are you using RBA.  Either of these events would mean additional troubleshooting steps would be required.
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Rule based ATP check with SOA

    Hello,
    We wish to implement ATP check using Ent Services.
    Details:
    Environment : SAP ECC 6.o with Enhancement Package 3/ SCM 5.0
    Ent service used: /SAPAPO/SDM_PARCRTRC :  ProductAvailabilityRequirementCreateRequestConfirmation
    We were able to carry out Product check using the service. However we are unable to carry out rule based ATP check using the same service.
    We have carried out the entire configuration as per SAP's building block configuration guide for Global ATP & SAP Note 1127895.
    For RBA <Rule based ATP check>, we are getting the results as expected when we create Sales order from SAP R/3 (Transaction VA01), however ATP simulation in APO & Ent service does not give the results as expected. When we carry out ATP simulation in APO / Ent service, results are same as Product check & not as RBA i.e. they respect only requested Product location stock & does not propose alternate Product or Location in case of shortages
    Plz share the experience to fix the issue
    Mangesh A. Kulkarni

    Hi mangesh
    Check this links , not very sure , but may help you...
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/erplo/availability%252bchecking%252bin%252bsap
    Re: ATP confirmation in CRM
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/scm/rba
    Regards
    Abhishek

  • ATP check with acknowledged PO 's only

    Dear Experts
    In ATP checking rule A or B my client does not want to consider all Purchase orders but only those which have been acknowledged by Vendor.
    Is there a possibility of this. I do not see any standard setting in configuration to achieve it.
    Regards,
    Neeraj Srivastava

    Hi,
    There is no standard SAP functionality can help your scenario.
    You can try to use exit EXIT_SAPLATPC_001. You can check with an ABAP'er for possibilities.
    Also try to look for OSS notes.
    Regards

  • User Exit called when online ATP check with GATP

    Hi Guys,
    I got requirement as below,
    Manipulate the GR time defined in the unloading point when the ATP confirmation of sales order is done with GATP online.
    I noticed that the online GATP check from R/3 to APO is not going via normal CIF way of communication or at least even i de-registered CIF queue monitoring, the data transfer can still go through properly.
    There are two questions popped up:
    1. Any body knows the background routine how the data are transferred between R/3 and APO when online GATP is done, and how to debug this process?
    2. Which functional module or exit user is called when online GATP check is done from R/3 sales order?
    If anyone knows something you are also welcome to share your expertise!
    Thanks!
    Tony

    hi! Tony
    These are the Exits in online GATP
    EXIT_/SAPAPO/SAPLATPT_001      APO ATP: Set ATP Segment                           
    EXIT_/SAPAPO/SAPLATPT_002      APO ATP: Select Substitutions                      
    EXIT_/SAPAPO/SAPLATPT_003      APO ATP: Initialize ATP Controller                 
    EXIT_/SAPAPO/SAPLATPT_004      APO ATP: Check for the Existence of a Location Alias
    EXIT_/SAPAPO/SAPLATPT_005      APO-ATP: Handling of Data at End of Check          
    Regards
    Vaibhav Sareen

  • Difference in Material availability date for ECC ATP check & for APO ATP check in the same order

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a question: on what basis material availability date is calculated in forward scheduling?
    Eg:
    For a customer GR hours are maintained in unloading point calendar in customer master and Customers are not CIF'ed across to APO.
    GR hours are maintained for weekdays from 8:00 to 12:00 & 1:00 to 6:00.
    In a sales order with two line items with Requested date today & plenty of stock on hand for two products( ECC & APO) where line 10 (product 1) triggers ECC ATP check & line 20 (product 2) triggers APO ATP check at same location (loc1).
    RDD is today, material availability date for ECC ATP check (line 10) is today (working as expected) but where as the material availability date for APO ATP check (line 20)is pushed to next day by which for the same customer there are different delivery dates. And two delivery notes will be created & truck will be on road at different times for the same customer which is unacceptable.
    What am I missing here to get the material availability date as today for forward scheduling? Please guide me on this.
    Thanks,
    Nihar

    Hi Nihar
    Though the logic you mentioned makes sense. I am confused here with the data you have provided:
    UTC day
    UTC time
    CET day
    CET time
    UTC+6 day
    UTC+6 time
    RDD
    30/04
    17:24
    30/04
    7:24
    30/04
    23:24
    MAD
    30/04
    17:24
    30/04
    7:24
    30/04
    23:24
    Lod/GI
    02/05
    17:24
    02/05
    7:24
    02/05
    23:24
    Del
    12/05
    17:24
    12/05
    7:24
    12/05
    23:24
    Del
    13/05
    1:00
    13/05
    3:00
    13/05
    8:00
    Load/GI
    05/05
    1:00
    05/05
    3:00
    05/05
    8:00
    MAD
    02/05
    1:00
    02/05
    3:00
    02/05
    8:00
    In the first row, the difference in RDD in UTC and UTC+6 is 6 hours. However, in the last three rows I can see the difference between UTC time and UTC+6 time is 7 hours. Would you know the reason to this? Also, in the first four rows, CET time = 7:24 which should had been 19:24. Please correct me if I am missing something here.
    Thanks,
    Parth Soneji

  • Re ATP check in the Sales order

    Hi,
    I have one strange issue in SO ATP check. I have created a SO and it was cofirmed with Availability check:XX, which was maintained in material master  when the SO was created. Then I changed the Avail check to YY and did the Re-ATP check again in SO, but the system takes the old Avail check:XX.
    It takes the new Avail check if I create a new line item in the SO, but did not work for the exisitng line item.
    Regards
    Nagarajan.

    Hi Nagarajan,
    The master data changes will effect only for the future entries not for the already entered material in the sale order or any other transaction

  • ATP check in the Sale order Processing and CO06 transaction (Confirm Qty)

    Hi All,
    While creating the Sale order, After performing the ATP check and saving the document i have called an user exit to make the confirmed Quantity equal to ZERO when the delivery block is set (As requested by customer). That is working fine...
    But the same confirmed Quantity of ZERO is not reflecting in CO06 transaction. Its showing the old value that the value before setting the delivery block.
    I have identified the table VBBE-VMENG which stores the confirmed quantity in CO06 transaction...
    Could you please help me know any USER EXITS or any other solution to change the confirmed quantity to ZERO in CO06 transaction also while delivery block is set in the sale order.
    Thanks &Regards,
    Navaneeth

    Hi All,
    Please help me by providing some clues on this issue...
    Regards,
    Navaneeth

  • ATP check for inbound EDI order

    Hi Friends,
    When I am creating outbound sales order then ATP check is getting executed properly & multiple schedule lines are getting creating in IDOC also (depending on the avaibility of stock).
    But When I am trying to create the inbound sales order via EDI/IDOC there is no ATP check performed & multiple schedule lines are not getting created in sales order(as per the avaibility of stock which I am checkin thro So09 tcode).
    ANy1 has faced smilier problem in past. If yes then please let me know how to solve this problem of ATP check.
    PLease let me know as soon as possible.
    Many thanks in advance
    Br, Prashant

    HI Frndz,
    problem is solved by using following customizing settings
    Customizing:
    SD/function/requirement availability/availability check/default (OVZJ)
    Change the field "Rule availability" to the required value. You receive a list of the possible values using the possible entries pushbutton. Rescheduling is regarded as background processing. If you want to allow partial deliveries, choose the value 'E'.

  • ATP Check with replenishment time

    Dear All,
    The system behaves, when we use the 02 availability check type in the material master and assign 02 check type to control rule A in OVZ9.In this assignment the no replenishment lead time is not selected;that's the system will take the replenishment lead time into account. But even if there's not enough stock, the sales order quantities are confirmed.
    When I activate/select the "no replenishment lead time in OVZ9, the system confirms what's available in the storage location.
    Is there thing missing in customizing? Is there any OSS note? The client actually requires the replenishment lead time in the availability check but the system also should give the correct confirmation in ATP check.
    What should be else?
    Regards
    J.Black

    Here what the problem is, even if the stock is not enough, the system confirms all the sales quantity in the sales order when the "check without  replenishment lead time" in OVZ9 is not selected. This is wrong.
    But when the "check without  replenishment lead time" is selected, the sales order quantity is confirmed correctly.What is available in the stock is confirmed correcly.This is correct.
    So the client wants the replenishment lead time selection in the OVZ9 and so that forward scheduling should exist but the stock availability check is şncorrect. What should we do now?

  • Order Processing - Capacity and ATP check with planned order

    Dear all,
    is it possible to block the creation of a sale order based with PP strategy 81 (or similar) if missing components for planned order are given?
    Is also possible to block the creation of a sale order with PP strategy 81 (or similar) if no alllowable capacity for planned order is given in the scheduled dates?

    Luca,
    is it possible to block the creation of a sale order based with PP strategy 81 (or similar) if missing components for planned order are given?
    Not in Standard SAP ERP.  You can block confirmation in 81 or 82.
    Is also possible to block the creation of a sale order with PP strategy 81 (or similar) if no allowable capacity for planned order is given in the scheduled dates?
    Not in standard SAP ERP.  It is possible to generate a notification popup during the capacity check.
    The functionalities you seek exist in APO using either CTP or MATP
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/EN/25/b0c23ba6af1855e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    Best Regards,
    DB49

Maybe you are looking for