ATP in SD. Advantage of ATP server & locks for multiple users.

hi,
I am working on ATP in SD. We have to design our own ATP calculation logic.
1. What is advantage of ATP server (logical partition) in SD. does it helps in regulating the calls for ATP calculation.
2. In standard there is lock for plant & material combination i.e. Material block with quantity transfer.  but here i want blocking to be done on the level material-storage location including one more entity called paper machine which is specific in this ATP calculation.

Hello Rishi,
It is quite possible to connect more than one SCM system to ECC technically. Business case will be little specific to customer requirements i.e having existing SCM systems for different business units.
GATP check can be carried out in different SCM system as you rightly mentioned based on CIF integration model. It doesn't create any issue. We have similar system set-up for internal use.
Only issue what I see here is, in case of RBATP, if you are using cross location ATP check, if will not give you desired results. Second issue will be for planned supply components, if material is planned in separate SCM system.
Such system set-up works fine when you are having isolated materials and location to plan and GATP.
Regards,
Dinesh Goyal

Similar Messages

  • Table data getting locked for multiple user for a Z-table updation after EH4 to EHP6 Upgrade

    Hi,
    We have one new upgraded system at EHP6, earlier system was at EH4 where multiple user can Run one Z  T-code and can edit the entries for the Z-table.
    This Z-Tcode is calling SM30 internally for updating the Z-Table.
    Now in the upgraded system, when one user is into the transation code, and other user runs that T-code, systems throws a POP-UP mesg saying that the data is locked and can be displayed only(can not be edited).
    I have debugged the code in both the environment and found that there is one statement Call C_ENQUEUE ID < > field. for which the Sy_Subrc is coming as 2 in the upgraded system which is causing the issue, where as the sy-subrc is 0 in the system at EH4 level.
    Can any body tell me why this Z-tcode is not allowing to be accessed by multiple user at same time for Editing(updating the table) .
    Regards,
    Archana Jha

    Hi,
    When you create the lock object you can define the keys.
    and then you can use those in the ENQUEUE function.
    Regards.
    regards.

  • The Windows SMB feature has file locking if multiple users are accessing the same file.  Does Snow Leopard Server File Sharing (AFP) provide similar features?

    The Windows SMB feature has file locking if multiple users are accessing the same file.  Does File Sharing (AFP) on Snow Leopard Server provide similar services?

    Were you ever able to solve this problem. I'm having similar issues since upgrading to snow leopard. Four macs connect to a Windows Server 2003 for shared files. Each user has full permissions & when we "get info" it shows read & write permissions. Two of the computers were running 10.4, two were running 10.5. Everything worked properly until upgrading to snow leopard. Some files let me copy, move, delete. Others either just hang up or we get a "no permission" error. Also getting a "pdf is in use" error, even when the file/folder doesn't contain a pdf. We had our IT rep check the server who said everything is in working order. They don't represent macs any longer but feel that it's a mac problem. I would have to agree since this problem only started after the upgrade, and the one machine that was not upgraded (still running 10.5.8) is not dealing with these problems.
    Lastly, I would install 10.5 back on all of the computers if I could, but the leopard disk that came with one of the computers wouldn't work with the 2 machines running 10.4 and I didn't see it available at the apple store. I'll buy it if it's still available, but why wouldn't the disks that I have work?
    Thanks for any help

  • How to make Adobe acrobat feature to convert SAP  Pages to PDF available for multiple users connected to the same Citrix server

    Hi,
    In my previous endeavours to solve this business requirement where multiple users will be able to use the Adobe acrobat feature to convert SAP pages inside SAP to PDF, I was told that it is not possible to do this for multiple users at the same time. However I have found an article according to which it says it is possible. Could you check it once and let me know if this article can be used for implementing the requirement stated above as this link clearly indicates that Adobe Acrobat is supported on Citrix.
    Please find the link below where it states it is adobe acrobat is supported in Citrix for multiple users.
    http://www.adobe.com/devnet-docs/acrobatetk/tools/AdminGuide/citrix.html.

    1. What is the Acrobat feature that you mean? There's nothing specific to SAP included with Acrobat.
    2. Yes, some Terminal Server configurations appear supported (check carefully). All users of the terminal server will need a license, so far as I know - total licenses = total individual people using.

  • Outgoing server works for one user not for other

    Hi,
    I just made a second user in Leopard. When logged in as the original user, the outgoing mail server works fine in Mail. When logged in as the new user, the outgoing mail server shows as 'offline' in Mail. In both cases the outgoing server is the same one.
    As the new user i can only receive mail and not send any. I am pretty sure the account settings on both mail accounts r identical(Authentication, SSL etc.) (except for user specific identification of course)
    Any advice/idea on what is wrong and what i can do to make the outgoing server work for both users?
    Thx,
    Brick

    Yes I am certain the authentication is correct. When trying to send a message out Mail gives a message saying my "SMTP server does not support authentication".
    When i open Mail preferences. The outgoing server is indicated as Offline.

  • Can I install Acrobat in a Windows Server 2008 for many users?

    I'm looking for a solution for my enterprise to install Adobe Acrobat in Windows Server 2008 R2, where the users connect by remote desktop. I'm looking for a form for they use Acrobat by the same form they uses now Reader. But not for all, only for some of this users.
    I called a responsible and he told me that I can install Acrobat for some users in Windows Server 2008 R2, but I'm not sure if that solution will be legal.
    Can I buy a special license for it or I have to buy a license for each user? How can I proceed to do this, if it's possible?
    Thanks in advance for you attention!

    Use a mozilla.cfg file in the Firefox program folder to lock prefs or specify default values.
    Place a file local-settings.js in the defaults\pref folder where you also find the file channel-prefs.js to specify using mozilla.cfg.
    pref("general.config.filename", "mozilla.cfg");
    pref("general.config.obscure_value", 0); // use this to disable the byte-shift
    See:
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Locking_preferences
    You can use these functions in mozilla.cfg:
    defaultPref(); // set new default value
    pref(); // set pref, but allow changes in current session
    lockPref(); // lock pref, disallow changes
    <pre><nowiki>lockPref("app.update.enabled", false);</nowiki></pre>

  • How do I set access to the same network share on a Windows server for multiple users on an iMac (school set-up) in Lion 10.7.3?

    We've got them authenticating/binding with AD (after hours of troubleshooting to get working), and their Home drive on the Windows 2003 server loads in the dock, but they also want to be able to load the same network shares on the server e.g. "Students$" for every student that logs onto the iMac.  I realise without Lion server we can't control it by group, but if we could at least set it up consistently for the students that would be a great start.
    Thanks.

    When you install you get the opportunity to install it for "All Users".
    It sounds like you have a demo version on your Mac however, you need to delete it:
    http://www.freeforum101.com/iworktipsntrick/viewtopic.php?t=105&mforum=iworktips ntrick
    Peter

  • How to find weblogic Server memory for particular user

    In a weblogic server how can i get the information for each user approximately
    it occupying "x" size of memory...is there any command..so that based on number
    of users i can increse my memory and harddisk space.

    Hi,
    Following sql will help you find the responsibilities associated with the users in oracle applications.
    SELECT frt.RESPONSIBILITY_NAME, furg.end_date
    FROM
    fnd_user_resp_groups furg,
    FND_RESPONSIBILITY fr,
    fnd_responsibility_tl frt,
    fnd_user fu
    WHERE fu.user_name = ‘&&username’
    AND fu.user_id = furg.user_id
    AND furg.responsibility_id = fr.RESPONSIBILITY_ID
    AND frt.responsibility_id = fr.RESPONSIBILITY_ID
    ORDER BY 1
    Cheers...

  • One JACK server for multiple users

    It seems that support for JACK_PROMISCUOUS_SERVER has been removed, so JACK only allows programs to connect which were started by the same user who started the JACK server. Is there another way to tell JACK to accept connections from other users? Or do I have to start two servers (one for each user) communicating via the local network?
    Why I'm asking:
    My browser is running with the permissions of the user "browser" to prevent malicious code executed by the browser to seriously affect my files. This leads to the problem that audio playback in the browser is rendered mute, as it cannot connect to the JACK server that has been started by my main user account.
    Any ideas on how to make this work?

    I don't think this was ever "supported". I somehow assume that the hack still works (with JACK_PROMISCUOUS_SERVER) but I have yet to go back to it since the last discussion about it. According to Torben H. (read the last few messages of that topic) it should work.
    NetJACK works in a different way and allows different clients to connect, AFAIK. It has been suggested that some form of this exact functionality can be used in lieu of the promiscuous trick for JACK itself.
    Anyway, for MPD, you can try the alternative setup.

  • Lyncdiscover reports HTTP 500 Internal Server Error for external users

    Hello,
    I have a problem providing lyncdiscover information for external Lync users. The same address works internal (prompts for file download) so I believe the problem is UAG/TMG providing the site which is not my cup of tea. I have a working external lyncdiscover
    for other domain in the same Lync + UAG/TMG server environment. I have also checked the public DNS records few times and everything should be fine. Firewall also shouldn't be an issue since it reports the internal server error, right? Any suggestions what
    should I check?

    more information based on Lync Autodiscover Web Service Remote Connectivity Test.
    Testing HTTP authentication methods for URL https://lyncdiscover.domain1.com/Autodiscover/AutodiscoverService.svc/root/user.
    HTTP authentication methods successful.
    Additional Details
    Testing HTTP content for URL https://lyncdiscover.domain1.comi/?sipuri=[email protected] has
    token="User".
    HTTP content isn't verified.
     <label for="testSelectWizard_ctl12_ctl06_ctl00_ctl04_tmmArrow">Tell
    me more about this issue and how to resolve it</label>
    Additional Details
    HTTP 200 status received from server, but no token="User".
    Elapsed Time: 203 ms.
    The same result goes for the other domain that provides the lyncdiscover information correctly for external users. It doesn't seem to solve the root cause but might help to understand
    the problem.

  • Server Path for iCal users

    I hope this doesn't come off as a dumb question... and I'm not really sure how to ask it.
    The server path for users in iCal are found at /principals/_uids_/really long string of random characters. Is this correct? Shouldn't they be found at /principals/_uids_/username
    Is something miss-configured on the server? Or am I missing something?

    If you're using a Snow Leopard client, you should not need to enter a path, only the credentials and server name (if you specify the calDAV service).
    For 10.5 clients, I had to use:
    http://server.domain.com:8008/prinicpals/users/usershortname
    or for secure:
    https://server.domain.com:8443/prinicpals/users/usershortname
    If you have to use the <uid> to make it work, you're in a world of hurt. As I understand it, that directory tracks individual events for the calDAV service, not the complete calendar.
    Good luck.
    J

  • Plan version locked for certain users

    Hi,
    Could someone help me regarding this issue.
    We would like to lock a plan version for some users and some users have to be able to work with that plan version.
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards.

    Hi Judit,
    Customizing: Controlling / general controlling / organizaion / maintain versions:
    Choose the version you want to work with, tick "controlling area settings" and in the rigth screen, scroll to the right until you view the field "AUGR".
    Read F1-help for this field and contact the authorization responsible to go on with that.
    best regards, Christian

  • Adding printers to Terminal Server 2008 for all users

    Hi!  I'm trying to add a printer to a terminal server for all users that log in.  I've been reading around and this seems like a working solution:
    Rundll32 printui.dll,PrintUIEntry /ga /c\\localcomputername /n\\servername\printername
    So I ran this with the proper parameters.  Nothing shows up in Devices and Printers with the name I specified.  I rebooted the server, still nothing.  I re-run the command above and it tells me there's already a printer defined with that name. 
    I look at Devices and Printers and the name I specified still isn't there.  Why doesn't the above command work like it's supposed to?
    Thanks!

    Thanks, yes, that was the first command I tried (without the /c).  All subsequent attempts tell me the printer already exists yet it definitely does not show up under Devices and Printers.  I ran the above logged in as Administrator with an elevated
    command prompt.  The printer can't be seen from this login or a 'normal' user login.

  • Silent install of SQL Server 2008r2 for ALL users?

    We ship an installer that does a silent install of SQL Server 2008r2 with all the 'right' parameters pre-configured. We use this:
    /QS /INSTANCENAME=MSSQLSERVER /ACTION=Install /FEATURES=SQL,BC,Conn,ADV_SSMS /SAPWD=MyPasswordGoesHere /SECURITYMODE=SQL /TCPENABLED=1 /ADDCURRENTUSERASSQLADMIN /SQLSVCSTARTUPTYPE=Automatic /SQLSVCACCOUNT="NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM" /AGTSVCACCOUNT="NT
    AUTHORITY\SYSTEM" /IACCEPTSQLSERVERLICENSETERMS
    However, the problem is that if a tech installs it for another user, that user does not have access, since ADDCURRENTUSERASSQLADMIN flag only adds the user who installed it -- rather than adding ALL users on the computer. (Or at least all admins.)
    I tried replacing ADDCURRENTUSERASSQLADMIN with this:
    /SQLSYSADMINACCOUNTS="BUILTIN\ADMINISTRATORS"
    but that also failed to work. How can we install for all users, or at least all administrators?
    NOTE: we do NOT know the name of the computer or the users. The installer has to work for any computer setup.
    Similar question has already been asked, but wasn't helpful:
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/8354675f-be9b-4909-b776-942f03954807/how-to-do-a-silent-install-of-sql-2010-express-for-all-users-on-a-computer?forum=sqlexpress
    The documentation does not make it clear what you can pass as allowed SQLSYSADMINACCOUNTS parameters. I also am not sure if I would need to change the AGTSVCACCOUNT or SQLSVCACCOUNT?

    I tried one more thing:
    /SQLSYSADMINACCOUNTS="BUILTIN\Administrators"
    which does not halt installation with an error. 
    However, doing:
    osql -E
    create database test
    go
    in a command prompt from a different admin user on the same machine results in a permissions error... but works if done from a command prompt on the user account from which MSSQLServer was installed.
    So for some reason /SQLSYSADMINACCOUNTS="BUILTIN\Administrators" does not work as expected.
    Anyone have any idea why?
    I checked the output log from the install, and found it had generated and used a configurationFIle to do the install. I looked in that file, and these were the settings, even though I did NOT pass /ADDCURRENTUSERASSQLADMIN as a command line option:
    ; Windows account(s) to provision as SQL Server system administrators. 
    SQLSYSADMINACCOUNTS="BUILTIN\Administrators"
    ; The default is Windows Authentication. Use "SQL" for Mixed Mode Authentication. 
    SECURITYMODE="SQL"
    ; Provision current user as a Database Engine system administrator for SQL Server 2008 R2 Express. 
    ADDCURRENTUSERASSQLADMIN="True"

  • Design lync server 2013 for 20000 users, licenses required

    Hi,
          for 20000 users, required features are IM/presence, Archive, external access thats it with HA. also its hyperv.
    is below configuration sufficient?
    4 FE enterprise server,  2 SQL mirrored, 2 Edge servers, 1 SQL witness
    20000 lync client license :- is there any client, which is not thick???
    20000 standard cals
    4 server cals
    3 SQL licenses
    am i missing anything here??

    If you build those servers out to the full specs mentioned in
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg615015.aspx you should be fine.
    The client software license is included with Office Pro Plus or can be purchased separately.
    The standard cal gets you IM and peer to peer AV.  Enterprise will get you conferencing and desktop sharing (see a breakdown here:
    https://mspartner.microsoft.com/en/wi/pages/solutions/downloads/lync-2013-licensing-guide.aspx)
    You'd want 4 Lync server licenses, correct.
    You'd only need two SQL server licenses as the witness can be SQL Express.
    As for missing... just Windows server licenses if you need them. 
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
    SWC Unified Communications

Maybe you are looking for