ATP Rule for Planned Orders

Hi Experts,
I have configured the ATP rule for Planned Orders. So I only want to check the component stock and Production Orders when running ATP check for the Parent Material.
In OPJJ, I only selected the following options.
Include Safety Stock : Ticked
Check without RLT : Ticked
Incl.production orders : X (Take all production Orders into account)
No other options or boxes have been selected
Also I have included the relevant Checking group in MRP 3 for the Parent Material (Checking Rule has been assigned to that Checking Group in Config) and also maintain the Plant Parameters for MRP (assign the checking rule to the plant)
So, For an example :
Parent : A
Components : B and C
Parent Material A has only 5 Planned Orders starting on same day 20.05.2014 each qty 5
Components B got stock 300
Components C got stock 1
When I ran ATP Check for the Parent material A using COHV, qty 1 has been allocated to all the planned orders as committed. Why is this happening ?
I also checked in CO09 for the Component Material C, and it says ATP Qty is only 1. I expected the system would allocate that stock 1 to one of the Orders but it seems to be not working as I expect.
Any explanations will be much appreciated and will not hesitate to avoid the points.
Kind regards,
Ishara

Hi DB49,
Appreciate your reply. Please see the following comments.
Right now I have been assuming that you have performed an availability check manually for one of the planned orders, and you got the same results (overconfirmation). Please confirm.
Yeah I have performed for one order and it gave me the same result. Also, when I perform for the 2nd Order, it allocates the quantity.
OK, basic things you should already have checked:
You have maintained the checking rule for planned orders (OPPQ or OPPR)
You have maintained the ATP group for the materials (OVZ2)
You have assigned the ATP group to the Material Master of the components (MM02)
You have maintained the scope of check according to the rules you mentioned earlier (OPPJ).
You have no planning strategy in the component material that would have invoked a special ATP.
I checked everything apart from point 2 (OVZ2). I have maintained that via MRP Group and that MRP Group has been linked to Master Data (MRP 3)
Really appreciate your support in this.
Kind regards,
Ishara

Similar Messages

Collective ATP check for production orders

Hi Gurus,
I tried the MDVP tcode, but I can only do the collective ATP check for planned orders. we wanted to do the collective check with production orders, can you tell me how I can do this?
Thanks.

I've posted this question but didn't get any response. Can some one please give me an idea how to do the collective ATP check for production orders.
Thanks
Vijaya

Disabling GATP for planned orders/production orders

Hi,
We have a scenario where we need to disable ATP check for production orders happening through GATP. That is, ATP check for production order materials should happen in SAP R/3. This is a problem because we have activated ATP check in integration models for sales orders and it is happening through GATP. Production Planning is happeninig in R/3 and we dont have either PP/DS or SNP in APO. ..only GATP.
any pointers on how the ATP check for planned orders/production orders can be blocked in GATP for the same materials which are active for sales order GATP check?
Thanks.

hi Pawan /Prasun /vikas
Thanks for your helpful answers
@Pawan : Since we have recently gone live with production planning and its in the process of stabilizing we do not want to enable ATP check for production orders in GATP yet. Also since we are also using batch-determination with ATP check in production orders we still have to check how the system responds with the combination. Therefore,as of now, we dont intend to switch on ATP for production orders in GATP.
@ Prasun : I understand there would be a user exit (EXIT_SAPLATPC_001) which would help in doing GATP check based on order type/business event. However my concern is if the order does not belong to any of the order types will the system do a normal standard ATP check in APO or it will do a ATP check in R3 ? Our programmers are still looking how to tweak it but any pointers based on your experience will be helpful
Thanks

User exit/ badi needed for planned order create/change,collective ATP check

Dear All,
I'm looking for a user exit/ badi which can be used for planned orders at the stage of
mass collective availability check (COMAC tcode) update; or at some other relevant stages of mass update of planned orders.
I need after collective availability check to perform the following:
1) to copy date from "total comitment" field on header tab of planned order and paste it (replace old date) to order finish date on header screen
then
2) to start a scheduling.
Very appreciate your help.
Best Regards,
Andrey
Edited by: Andrey Kruglov on Apr 15, 2010 3:06 PM
Edited by: Andrey Kruglov on Apr 15, 2010 3:07 PM

Dear,
Use the BAPI : BAPI_PLANNEDORDER_CHANGE
Or use the function module MD_SET_ACTION_PLAF for Schedule planned order.
and the transaction MDAC Execute action for planned order
This function module includes the following actions:
Explode BOM
Explode BOM, check availability
Check availability, only explode BOM in the case of a requirement
Check availability, do not explode BOM
Reset availability
Change planned order data
Schedule planned order
Delete planned order
Assign the key for the respective action control to the materials in the material master (MRP 4 view).
Please refer this thread,
Re: MDVP for collective orders
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

User exit in ATP Check for sales Order to trigger notification

Hi All
please let me know is there any user exit after ATP check or in ATP check for sales order to trigger a notication mail.
Regards
Kishore

Hi,
User Exits For Availability Check are given below:-
The user exits named here are planned for projects that are to be carried out in agreement with SAP development as they may only be used in consultation with SAP.
USEREXIT_PLANT_SELECTION in program RV03VFZZ is an exception to this rule (see below).
User exits in program FV45VFZZ
USEREXIT_ADD_FIELD_TO_HEADER
USEREXIT_ADD_FIELD_TO_LINE
User exits in program FV45VFZY
USEREXIT_DELIVERY_GROUPS
USEREXIT_MVERF_INIT
USEREXIT_QUOTA_KEY_VALUE
User exits in program RV03VFZZ
USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_IN
USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_OUT
USEREXIT_DARA_REFRESH
USEREXIT_PLANT_SELECTION
This user exit is used to adjust the flow during plant transfer. A list of permitted plants, where this material is created, is determined and checked in the standard R/3 delivery. A dialog box appears where you can select the plants. The user exits allow you to modify the plant table so that plant selection takes place in advance for every flagged selection and a dialog box becomes unnecessary.
regards
Vivek.

Settlement rules for CO Orders

Hi Guru, need your help to set up new settlement rules for CO Orders, to different plan versions. Can this be done in a massive way?

Hi...
Firstable, you have to create all plan version in the Controlling area, and activate the CO integration planning.
You can create many settlement rules for each plan version but individually on the transaction KO02 -> Settlement Rule -> New rule...
If you want to creat it automatically, maybe you can try to create a LSMW for this transaction. There are masive modification for other field to internal orders (Transactions KOK2 and KOK4)
Regards,
Karim

Settlement Rule for Internal Order

Hi All
I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
CAT - FXA
Settlement Receiver - Asset
% - 100
Settlement type - Full
Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
Message no. KD042
Diagnosis
You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

Hi:
        Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
"Symptom
    1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
    2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
Additional key words
KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
Cause and prerequisites
    1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
    You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
    The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
    2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
Solution
    1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
    2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
    Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
Regards

Error-M2O-Settlement rule for assembly order for item...could not be genera

Hi,
When I am creating Sales Order (VA01) for M2O, I am able to do the costing and copy the EK02 condition type. I have verified the the incompletion log, it indicates that document is complete.
But while saving the sales order, the below error message is displaed:
Settlement rule for assembly order for item 000010 could not be generated. Should the order still be saved?
                Yes/No
1. If No is choosen the following error message is displayed
       Error when processing Production order
      Error when processing Production order
      Message no. V1380
      Diagnosis
        A technical error has occurred. On calling up the assembly interface, exception 5 was triggered. The exceptions have the following meanings:
1 = External block, 2 = General error, 3 = Insufficient data for the interface, 4 = Order was not found, 5 = Update has been rejected, 6 = Final document number for Production order is not issued. Procedure: Inform your system administrator.
2. If Yes is choosen, it is creating Production Order without settlement rule. Able to perform GI & Gr. If I try to enter settelement rule (Settlement receiver SDI - Sales document item) in production order (CO02), the belwo error message is displayed
"Distribution rule for Sales document item can only be created automatically Message no. KD063"
We are using the requierement class with below details:
Reqmts class: ZSO- for M2O
AAC = E, Valuation = A, Settlement profile =SD1, RAKey = 000004, Assembly type = 3.
Settlement profile contain:
Allocation structure, PA structure, Default object type = SDI. Valid receivers: Optional -Sales Order / Prof. seg.
If I make the Valuation field as blank in Reqmts class, there is no error while creating Sales order. And also Settelemnt rule with sales document item as receiver is successfully creating for the production order. Since the Valuation is blank in requirement class, it is Non valuated Sales order stock. All GIs & GR are non valuated
The business requirement is it should be valuated sales order stock and the production varinaces has to be settled to Sales order. Then Sales order has to be settled to COPA.
Need your valuable inputs to meet this requirement.
Let me know if you need any further details.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
ADI

Dear SAP PP Consultant ,
What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ?

Creation of Reservation for planned order

Hi Team,
Is it possible to create reservation for planned orders after MRP run?
My opinion was the reservation can only be created with reference to production order after MRP. The reservation can not be created with reference to planne dorders after MRP run because planned orders are intermident document which will not exist in the system always. The planned order details will not be available in the system once it get converted into production order.
How the reservation will be processed which was created with reference to planned order after converting the planned order to production order?
Kindly need ur guidance.
Thanks
psk

Dear PSK,
In a typical discrete manufacturing setup production orders are the promised receipt for which reservations gets generated as
soon a production order is created.But only if the order is released goods movements can be posted against the reservation
details through MIGO/MB1A for 261 movement.
It's not required to create any reservation at the planned order level or which may not help you in any means to your business.
But however in a REM scenario MF60 is used to create stock transfer reservations for 311 movement where planned orders
are used for production backflush.To explain in detail even without any planned orders you can do a stock transfer reservation
for a production quantity.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

How to connect MAPL and PLPO to derive work center for planned order

Hi,
Anybody know how to derive work center using MAPL and PLPO for planned order (PLAF). Is there any connecting table between MAPL and PLPO.
Please help asap.
Regards,
Mitali

I guess u r trying to view the detail scheduling info (tab in MD13) for a planned order . In that case -
1. Go to PLAF and enter the planned order number. (PLAF-PLNUM) and get the ID of the capacity requirements record (PLAF-BEDID).
2. With this PLAF-BEDID go to KBED. pass the value here. KBED-BEDID. The KBED-ARBID values are your work center ID.
3. To get the work center texts ( the way is appears in the screen) - Pass this value to CRHD . CRHD-OBJTY = 'A' ( i.e Type work center) and CRHD-OBJID = KBED-ARBID.
Hope it solves ur prob.
Cheers
SKC

Extractor for Planned order

Hi Experts,
I am looking for the stabdard extractor for the Planned order, Basically I need the fields from the table PLAF.
Please let me know any standard extractor available or any extractor need to enhance.
Thanks
sai

Hi Sai,
Take a look at 2LIS_04_P_MATNR and see if it is usefull:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/88/7fc73c0c52085be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Else it seems that you should create a generic extractor directly on the table according to this thread:
Re: Extractors for Planned orders and Proces Orders
Hope this helps.
BR
Stefan

Posting rule for assembly order for item 000000 could not be generated

Hi all,
While creating production order from sales order system giving an error message 'Posting rule for assembly order for item 000000 could not be generated.'
Kindly help to resolve the issue.
SmanS

Dear SAP PP Consultant ,
What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ?

Table For Planned Order Details From PP Module

In our organisation we are taking Plan Vs Acheivement from Production. So, intialy we taken Plan details from "PLAF" Table and Acheivement details from "S225" Table. But After running MRP at month end. Previous month plan get deleted and new order create.
how to get history data for Planned order.
Please help us.
Regards
Naga

I don't think that there is any history in regard to planned orders. PLAF will get rebuilt according to your MRP parameters and I don't believe that the data is stored.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

Settlement Rules for PP Orders - Need a user exit?

Hello,
We have a PP Order Type (ZSVL) that requires a sales order to create. SAP then defaults in a settlement rule with 100% to the MAT. We want to default in or alter via user exit a settlement rule with 100% to a specific fixed cost center. We cannot get SAP to default it in. We have not found a user exit that will let us alter this settlement rule, either at PP Order save or during settlement. If we can't do this then the user is forced to manually change the rule for every order entered and we want to avoid this, if possible.
Any suggestions?
Ideas tried already:
PP Order exits and BADIs do not include Settlement Rules in their interfaces.
IWO0027 settlement exit is for internal orders and does not work on PP orders
K_SETTLEMENT_1 has limited fields to change.
[Picasa Photos of Settlement Rule|http://picasaweb.google.com/johnnorman/SAPSettlementRule?feat=email#]
[Alternate Link to Picasa Photos|http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=johnnorman&target=ALBUM&id=5371036612659624289&authkey=Gv1sRgCNio0I2O376a_gE&feat=email]
This is SAP 4.7 patch level 19... behind but upgrade to 6.0 is next year...
Thank you for your help and any ideas in advance!

Hi,
PP Orders should always be settled to the Material and thats the standard SAP design. From the settlement rule it is clear that you have created a Cost Center called Production Variance and the settlement is pointed to that Cost Center.
A better design / approach would be to settle the PP Orders to MAT. And Month-End Variance calculation will categorize the variances and push to CO-PA. Variances reports could help in gathering the information regarding the variance categories and the amount of variances. (If that is the only purpose why you are settling to CTR). Currently, since you are settling the variances to the CTR, how the Cost Center is getting cleared / zeroed?
The existing approach can be re-visited and business requirements can be analyzed to see how that can be met through what SAP delivers.
Thanks,

Create new settlement rule for an order with a function module

Hi,
I would like to create a settlement rule for an order. I searched for existing function modules and found K_ORDER_SETTLEMENT_RULE, which seems to be the correct one.
The problem: The settlement rules, which I create with this function module are not saved.
Do I have to call another function module to save my new rules?
Thanks in advance,
Fabian

Hi,
Settlement rules are first of all defined in customizing how the should be behave and secondly lies the question how to update a CO cost object with this settlement rule.
My first advice would be to use the "automatic settlement derivation feature" that can be setup in customizing alike. <b>SPRO -> Controlling -> Internal Orders -> Actual Postings -> Settlement -> Automatic generation of Settlement Rule</b>. Read the docu for this node (right click and choose Display documentation) to understand what possibilities and limitations this functionality has. Below this node you have the possibility to define a "settlement strategy" and allocate this to a order type. You can also define a Enhamcement (COOM0003
) where you can somewhat influence the automatic generation of settlement rules.
Execute transaction KO8G (collective processing) or KO88 (indicidual processing) to create a settlement rule for internal orders.
The other option you have is to create a custom program based on BDC to create settlement rule for internal orders.
I think the BDC program would be a better idea for you.
Let me know if you have any question.
Regards,
RS

ATP Rule for Planned Orders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for