ATSServer hogging processor & a fix

There seems to be some issue with the ATSServer gradually increasing its CPU usage to an unreasonable rate. Three times today it's happened, and after doing a bit of research, I've found a remedy that seems to work.
As to why it works, I don't know.
Repair permissions on the disk and the CPU usage goes down to where it should be. It's worked 3 times so far. Perhaps someone else can use this fix too.

The culprit application is different in every case, i've learnt that studying the issue over the week i've had this problem.
After days of applying all the "sudo" commands found on the web that relates to the problem with syslogd ......finally ! yesterday i could fix it going to the core of the problem which in my case was McAfee.
Even uninstalled i still found remains of it inside usr/local and trashed it.
(used File Buddy for it)
I'd uninstalled anything that logs to the system, now i'm going carefully to install back everything except McAffee.
Good luck !
Message was edited by: William2014

Similar Messages

  • Contacts, AddressBookSourceSync, etc., hogging processor

    I'm on a clean install of Mavericks on an early 2009 8-core Mac pro.
    1. After the machine is up for a while, it becomes unresponsive, and Activity Monitor typically shows AddressBookSourceSync as the culprit, hogging 100% of the CPU.
    2. Console shows many icbaccountsd events every minute. Those messages state:
    1/13/14 1:02:32.279 pm icbaccountsd[422]: -[ICBLocalDictionary discoverLocalIAAccounts]: Unknown high level account: com.apple.account.addressbook -
    1/13/14 1:02:32.280 pm icbaccountsd[422]: -[ICBLocalDictionary discoverLocalIAAccounts]: Unknown high level account: com.apple.account.google -
    1/13/14 1:02:32.280 pm icbaccountsd[422]: -[ICBLocalDictionary discoverLocalIAAccounts]: Unknown high level account: com.apple.account.addressbook -
    1/13/14 1:02:32.289 pm icbaccountsd[422]: -[ICBSyncOperation mergeLocalChanges:]: Got the following deleted accounts: { }
    1/13/14 1:02:32.289 pm icbaccountsd[422]: -[ICBSyncOperation mergeLocalChanges:]: Looking for UUID: (null) from remote key:
    1/13/14 1:02:32.289 pm icbaccountsd[422]: -[ICBSyncOperation mergeLocalChanges:]: Account not found during local discovery, however was not found in list of deleted accounts, will not delete:
    1/13/14 1:02:32.289 pm icbaccountsd[422]: -[ICBSyncOperation mergeLocalChanges:]: Got the following deleted accounts: { }
    1/13/14 1:02:32.289 pm icbaccountsd[422]: -[ICBSyncOperation mergeLocalChanges:]: Looking for UUID: (null) from remote key:
    1/13/14 1:02:32.289 pm icbaccountsd[422]: -[ICBSyncOperation mergeLocalChanges:]: Account not found during local discovery, however was not found in list of deleted accounts, will not delete:
    (Bolding is mine. That item seems telling. And I've removed numeric strings that may be personally indentifiable; I'm not sure.)
    The last 4 items always repeat another 10 times (for a total of 12 times), and then the process stops briefly. Then, 3-5 minutes later, the entire cycle starts all over again.
    3. In Preferences > Internet Accounts, there are a few accounts that I'm unable to delete. I have 3 active iCloud email addresses and 1 inactive gMail address. The primary iCloud address of course has all of the typical items checked -- mail, contacts, calendars, etc., etc. I noticed that the two, secondary addresses also had contacts and notes selected -- but I don't need either of those addresses to sync contacts or notes. So, I've attempted to untick those checkboxes, but generally, whenever I do, the boxes recheck themselves automatically after a minute or so.
    There are also separate Contacts entries, at the bottom of the list, bearing the names of the secondary email addresses. I've attempted to delete those, but they always come back automatically.
    With that in mind, I logged into those accounts in iCloud.com (on the web), and I discovered that each address had a few contacts in its own address book. So, in Contacts.app (which syncs with my primary iCloud account), I exported vcards for those contacts, just in case, then at iCloud.com, I deleted those entries from the secondary accounts' Address Books. Those items remained in the primary address' Address Book, and I have no idea why those contacts ever got assigned to the secondary addresses. But now, those Address Books are absolutely empty. I was hoping that after doing so, I could delete those entries in Preferences > Internet Accounts, but even though those address books are now empty, the deleted entries always reappear after a minute or two.
    4. Another thread brought to my attention the folder ~/Library/Application Support/AddressBook/Sources. That person had similar, but not identical, problems, and he found that on his computer, this folder had a few hundred folders, each containing a Configuration.plist file that pertained to one of his email addresses. He was able to solve his problem (duplicate address collections in Contacts.app) by deleting all of the folders with plists that pointed to the problem address. When I viewed this folder on my Mac, I found it contained 13,800 such folders.
    But on my Mac, the plot thickens, because in my Sources folder, a new plist folder is created and added to the folder every 20-25 seconds. So the Sources folder gains 2-3 new items every minute. (Hence, the 13,800 folders previously mentioned.) I have not been able to determine what function is propogating the folders.
    5. Following the advice on another thread, I tried:
    • Quitting Contacts.app
    • Force-quitting AddressBookSourceSync
    • Deleting the reappearing items in Internet Accounts, and
    • Deleting com.apple.internetaccounts.plist -- then
    • Quickly restarting the Mac.
    But to no avail.
    This is a clean install, so, I'm stumped. Obviously I signed in to my existing iCloud accounts, but I did not copy over any preference files for address book, etc., from the previous hard drive's backup in an attempt to avoid copying over any gremlins from the last hard drive. But for the record, I never had this problem in Mountain Lion. So, this is something that has arisen as a result of migrating to Mavericks. (No, I did not use Migration Assistant)  :-)
    If anyone has any suggestions, they'd be most welcome.
    Thanks.

    I was having the "ICBSyncOperation mergeLocalChanges Account not found during local discovery" error repeatedly in the Console after adding and deleting some email accounts.  This support article fixed my problem <OS X Mavericks v10.9.1: Repeated prompts to unlock "Local Items" keychain>.

  • AICS3 hogging processors when nothing happening

    I notice whenever AICS3 is running, my whole computer seems to slow down (it's a G5 dual-core 2.3, 2 gb RAM). Looking at activity monitor it's taking 20% of my CPU, but no files are open and it's in the background.
    Could this be because Version Cue is enabled? It's not something I need - I could disable it if it's a known hog. Anything else that might be the cause?

    Ah! How clever. I hadn't thought of that.
    Yes, I've had the internet connected. I did unplug it the 2nd time I tried the CUDA button, but replugged before turning the computer back on.
    Had a look in Console, couldn't see anything obvious RE time... though did see why the computer was sleeping itself last night when the temp was getting to 65C - thermal runaway detected - will sleep system...
    I ran the thermal calibration test... which I've ran several times before back in July when I first got this machine because of the v/frequent running fans... Always calibrated ok then... But this time - CPU 1 TAFS out of range - Replace CPU.
    This CPU which has ran 15°C hotter than CPU 0, but there'd been no other signs of problems - no crashes/etc. Even from a cold start, CPU 1 shows straight away as 15C hotter... which I find odd?
    I've installed Processor control panel... and turned CPU 1 off... At this point, it's now still reading at about 52C... (Activity Monitor confirms no action on that CPU)
    Rather than looking now for a new CPU, are there other options? Could it be the heat sink not correctly attached? Someone suggested I ditch the heat sinks and go with thermal paste?
    Thanks very much for your help guys. Had really hoped to "upgrade" from my eMac on the cheap ($99 G5, $96 17" Apple studio display)... not sure now this is going to work out ok after all!
    cheers
    cosmic

  • Can my processor be fixed or replaced?

    So i was wondering....if my processor takes a xshxitx on me can i get it fixed or replced and if so is it possible to get a better one at that time as long as i give it to apple to do so? I have been asking around and have gotten nowhere fast!

    Maybe but I would not call your chances of that very good.
    Even more difficult would be getting a new motherboard.
    The simpliest way to upgrade a Mac is to sell the old one and buy a new one.
    Unlike PCs, Mac really do hold resale value.
    Allan

  • Dreamweaver CS3 hogging CPU - any fix?

    I finally upgraded from GoLive CS2 to Dreamweaver CS3. (If it ain't broke, don't fix it!)
    Dreamweaver at idle is using over a quarter of my CPU! (Mac Mini 1.83GHz Intel Core Duo, 2GB RAM) No well-written program does this so I figure there must be something that I can turn off that was defaulted to "on" so I can speed up my computer.
    It's so bizarre that it demands almost half a GHz—460,000,000 cycles per second, folks—just sitting there!
    Thanks!
    Andrew

    Thanks for the suggestion, but no. Activity Monitor is showing it's distinctly the Dreamweaver CPU process, plus I updated the software just a few days before.
    I've seen other discussions online posted in the past couple of years about the same CPU-hogging problem on Mac and Windows boxes. There was some Windows patch (I believe it was from an unauthorized 3rd party) that purportedly fixed the problem, but I didn't see anything for Macs and I wasn't sure if there was any official solution (even if it involves upgrading to CS4) . . . other than live with a program that's making your system slow down for no good reason.
    Thanks,
    Andrew

  • Did Lenovo cripple my processor to fix an overheating problem? Screenshots included.

    I have an X61s which was suffering from a hot right palmrest and an overheating issue where the system would shut itself off after a few minutes of high CPU load. I sent the system in for depot repair. According to one of the Lenovo techs I spoke with today, they replaced the wireless card (known source of right palmrest heat) and a fan - but I'm beginning to think that's not all they did to solve the overheating problem, at least as far as it pertained to the CPU and the system shutting off.
    The CPU is a 1.6GHz processor. After the system was returned to me, I sensed that it was running slower than before. I performed a test using Orthos and the Intel Thermal Analysis Tool to monitor CPU frequency. Sure enough, as the attached image shows, even with the Power Profile set at High performance, the processor was maxing out at 1200MHz under full load, 75% of it's 1600MHz maximum.
    Screenshot
    I installed RightMark CPU Clock Utility, which includes a CPU frequency monitoring function. It too reported the CPU frequency at 1200MHz. HOWEVER, when I changed the RightMark profile to Maximal Performance, the CPU frequency did hit 1600MHz as shown by RightMark's monitor and Intel's Thermal Analysis Tool. Suspecting maybe this was just a reporting error and my CPU was actually running at 1600MHz despite Intel's tool saying 1200MHz, I tested each with Prime95's benchmark function.
    CPU Benchmark without RightMark (1.2GHz) - 1792K FFT length best time = 65.751
    CPU Benchmark with RightMark (1.6GHZ) - 1792K FFT length best time = 106.146 ms
    Clearly there is a real difference in speed here, not just a CPU frequency reporting discrepancy.
    Given the fact that RightMark is able to bypass the default processor settings, which is what allows you to use it to undervolt a processor, it's not a surprise to me that it would be able to run the processor at it's native maximum speed of 1.6Ghz, where otherwise my processor seems to be somehow limited to 1.2GHz regardless of which power profile I've selected: I've tried High Performance, Maximum Performance and others, and have verified that the maximum processor state in each is set to 100%, yet still the CPU frequency is at 1.2GHz.
    When I sent this machine in for repair, I removed the hard drive - so whatever the Lenovo Depot did (assuming that they did do something to my processor) could not have affected the OS or other software on my system. I did notice that RightMark seems to have "lost" it's previous settings, which may suggest that Lenovo replaced the CPU or motherboard and RightMark reset itself having detected a new processor.
    Note that BIOS settings are all set to enable Maximum Performance (though I believe Windows bypasses these settings anyway), SpeedStep enabled and the other key CPU setting enabled (which I forget right now and don't want to reboot to check my BIOS for the name).
    I've called and spoken with 3 different people at Lenovo about this and none were of any help other than suggesting I start a new case and have my laptop shipped back in - but before I do that, I want to get to the bottom of this. If Lenovo intentionally crippled my machine to "solve" a hardware problem - and without notifying me, no less, then I am far from a happy customer.
    So, please provide any input if you have any. Is it possible that Lenovo did something to either the CPU or the BIOS to limit the CPU speed to 1.2GHz? Or is this just a crazy conspiracy theory? Has anyone else had overheating issues and noticed their laptop running more slowly after it's been fixed?

    Hello kctopitz,
    please install your battery and plug in AC. Without battery, plugged into the wall, you´ll never reveive the full power.
    I would then suggest to measure the CPU clock with Everest, you can download it as a trial.
    Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter! Try the forum search, before first posting: Forum Search Option
    Please insert your type, model (not S/N) number and used OS in your posts.
    I´m a volunteer here using New X1 Carbon, ThinkPad Yoga, Yoga 11s, Yoga 13, T430s,T510, X220t, IdeaCentre B540.
    TIP: If your computer runs satisfactorily now, it may not be necessary to update the system.
     English Community       Deutsche Community       Comunidad en Español

  • SoftwareUpdateCheck process won't quit - hogs processor

    Hi All,
    Just gave my wife a new MacBook for Xmas last month and it has the strangest bug. SoftwareUpdateCheck seems to run in the background endlessly and even when quitting it from Activity Monitor, it reappears. I've already noted the difficulty of storing packages and running the updates and such, and we definitely had that issue on her MacBook (in which data was migrated from her iBook), but eventually got the updates to stick.
    Does anyone know what is causing this or how to disable the process so the MacBook can sleep and have processor time for other things? Her OS is totally up to date and I'm wondering how to squash this bug.
    Thanks!
    Mick

    Mick,
    You said that you migrated some stuff from her iBook? So you have gone from G4 PPC land to Intel.
    Well that sounds like part of the problem right there. If you migrated some important saved documents over then that is fine. But its been a recurring thing on here for people who have migrated Programs and Apps too through the "update" or "migrate" process to have issues.
    I personally just bought a MacBook Pro last week. As with any new Mac, I always save the documents that are "keepers" (like photos, documents, music, etc..) to a external drive, then I wipe that shiny new Mac's hard drive and do a clean install. It seems to eliminate most of the potential issues.
    Another thing is make sure that you replace or upgrade any software you have to Universal binaries. If you are running old PPC apps or if some PPC stuff got migrated to the new machine, it will be running under Rosetta and that will be slow, and eat the processor.
    HTH.

  • Runaway Keyaccess hogging processor??  Devious problem!  Please help.

    I updated to 10.5.2 yesterday from 10.5.1 (powerbook G4 12"). Fan now running continuously, computer is hot. Looked at activity monitor and found that KeyAccess was using 80-95% of the processor. Cannot force quit KeyAccess from activity monitor---it just comes back on. No applications are running, network disconnected, no discs connected----tried rebooting, removing battery---no change. Found KeyAccess in OS9 system folder preferences (os9 not running on this computer) and removed all KeyAccess files to the trash, rebooted and got the same problem. Seems bizarre! What do you wise ones suggest?

    Just put your 10.6 install disc in the drive and boot with "D" held down. That should get you to Apple Hardware Test.
    I'm betting your hard drive is going south. Other programs seem to work fine, because everything they need (at the moment) is in memory. The program(s) that fail to work are the ones looking to access the hard drive. If I'm right, then at least the repair cost will just be that of a new drive and some time spent reinstalling the OS. The Mac Pros are a real joy to work on in that regard. Not even any cables to mess with.
    If you have an external drive with a bootable OS on it, you could test this as well. Run it off the external for a day or two, see if the problem goes away. You could even disconnect the internal to be extra sure that Spotlight won't cause problems trying to index anything on it.

  • Firefox is being a memory hog - how to fix this?

    Hello,
    I believe this is the correct forum for this type of post.
    With a few tabs open, my Firefox is eating over 450MB RAM. And, if I open more tabs, it quickly grows to 600+ MB.
    This cannot go on. How can I make FF eat less RAM? I tried recompiling it with xulrunner-optimized from AUR, but it didn't help at all.
    I have the extensions: 1-ClickWeather, Adblock Plus, DownThemAll, NoScript, StumbleUpon, Tab Mix Plus. I'm using 64-bit Arch.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks.

    Are you sure it is 600mb? The real usage is the RSS column when you do 'ps uxw'.
    I found that Adblock Plus is pretty resource intensive. I replaced it  with a custom /etc/hosts,  and a userContent.css file in my firefox profile. iIt blocks about 80% of what Adblock Plus does while lowering memory usage.
    userContent.css    see:  http://www.floppymoose.com/
    hosts             see:  http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/

  • Power Mac G5 dual processor problem

    So I've got a Power Mac G5 Dual 1.8Ghz that I bought used that only had one processor working. When started up, the screen hangs after the gray start up screen. I figure replacing both processors would fix the problem. Having bought 2 new processors, I installed them and now the computer won't boot at all. The power light comes on but doesn't stay on, the fans spin but nothing comes up on the screen. Is this a logic board problem? Any help would be appreciated.

    BDAqua wrote:
    Hi Jade8503, and a warm welcome to the forums!
    After changing CPUs you need to calibrate everything for one, look for Apple Service Diagnostics, ASD 2.6.3 I think, not sure which G5s that is for actually, but it's a start.
    2.5.8 should work on that machine as well.

  • Which is better, faster processor or more ram?

    Hello all!
    I'm planning on upgrading from my 1.33Ghz g4 ibook with 512mb of ram to a new macbook, because Logic Express 7 and Final Cut Express 3.5 don't run very well on my current system. Because of money constraints, I'm limited in what features I can afford, so I'd like some advice from other mac users. In having to choose between getting an entry level macbook with 2gb of ram, or the mid-level macbook with only 1gb of ram, which would you think might handle these two applications best?

    Hi skipgo,
    welcome to macbook forum.
    I would go with the faster processor, not only the processor is fixed and not upgradeable, you also got bigger hard drive and superdrive that will be crucial for backing up big files on dvd (4 gb) or dual layer dvd (8 gb) and or burn your project into dvd from your FCE using iDVD.
    And memory is tend to go cheaper each day and relatively easy to upgrade it yourself compare to built to order 2 gb memory in entry model at apple store.
    And remember that apple will not accept return on BTO model just in case you decided to return it within their 14 days grace period.
    Good Luck.
    ps: beat by Mike with the same advise.....

  • More Memory or faster processor?

    Hi, Im interested in buying a Macbook soon and have a question. Which setup would give me better performance?
    1)
    2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    2 GB Memory
    2)
    2.16GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    1GB Memory
    Everything else is exactly the same. Thanks in advance

    Hi jtp861,
    I prefer faster processor over more ram, because the processor is fixed, while ram you can upgrade anytime.
    Also with 2.16 model you also get dual layer dvd burner that will come handy if you need to back up your iTunes library and your other data.
    And if you purchase 2.0 with 2 gb of ram directly from apple, it considered as built to order item, and apple will not accept return on BTO order.
    Better upgrade memory yourself.
    Good Luck.

  • Fixed assets capiralisation auc

    hello all
    please explain the processor of fixed assets capitalisation
    thank in advance
    ram

    (1) Asset class should be created with  'Line item settlement' for AUC
    (2) Assets can be created under the AUC asset class - while booking the GR, values get collected in the AUC asset
    (3) AUC asset is then settled to the final asset - using transctions AIBU and AIAB - transfer rules (% of value for receiver assets) are maintained first, and then settlement is run. 
    This is at a very high level.  Hope this helps
    Thanks.

  • How to reseat processors

    All,
    I am having issues with my G5 dual 1.8 early 05 model (well, basically it won't boot anymore...) that i have described in another post (light on/off, spin noise, no chime, then fans full speed, then nothing).
    Took it to an Apple approved service centre where they told me the usual "replace logic board" for a mere £700.
    Before i part with my cash, i'd like to try reseating the processors as i have seen this fix similar issues in other posts. I'm trying to find out how it can be done though. I had a look but i don't know how to remove the processor cover and then reseat them.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.
    Laurent

    Hi!
    There are 2 small rivets on the side above the video card. With a sharp tool (blade or Xacto) pry up and remove the plug in the center. Put a screw in the rivet and rock it out of the heatsink. Then slide the cover to the front of the machine and lift...
    Processors are fixed to the casing with four screws. You'll need an unusually long screwdriver (PH2 or 2.5 hex). Lift them up straight and when putting them back, you have to press down, do it on the base of the heatsink only.
    Take care...
    Jeff

  • Applications opening delays

    Hi to all,
    I just bought the MacBook Pro 15", the current standard model: intel core i7@2,3 GHz, 4GB ram, 500 gb HD, etc (http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MD103LL/A?)
    The original installed operating system was LION and I updated to MOUNTAIN LION by appstore.
    After installing Mountain Lion, I noticed many annoying delays when I open any applications.
    For example, about 2-2,5 seconds (after click) to display the system preferences window, or to display the notes windows, or message windows, or whatever app windows! I don't have installed any applications, there are only the OS X apps. I am very angry because this is not allowed on a new computer.
    Note: the MacBook Pro is not slow, there are only delays when I open each applications
    Please, could somebody help me?
    Do I format the HD and make a "Clean installation" of mountain lion?
    Many thanks..

    There are some things you can do to fix this. There may be some simpler things to do rather than a clean installation.
    First you have to figure out what the problem is.
    1. First, before you do anything, make sure you have a backup of any files you don't want to lose.
    2. Make sure your hard drive is not too full. It needs some empty space (like at least 10 or 20 %) for the computer to work properly. Click on the hard drive in the finder and go to Get Info in the File menu and it will show you how full the hard drive is.
    3. Take a look at Activity Monitor (Applications > Utilities), and see if there is some application or process that is hogging processor time.
    4. Make a new test User account and see if the problem persists. If it does not, then you know that the problem lies in some software that you have added to your User account.
    5. Similarly, try a safe boot How to Use Your Mac's Safe Boot Option which starts up your mac with a minimum of software.
    6. This should keep you busy for a while. Alternatively you could go to the geniuses at your Apple Store and ask them to fix it.
    7. Here is a good article on general mac maintenance and troubleshooting: Mac OS X BASIC TROUBLESHOOTING & MAINTENANCE Tips Mountain Lion 10.8 Lion 10.7 Snow Leopard 10.6 10.5 Tiger 10.4 Why How To Tutorials

Maybe you are looking for

  • Works in Query Analyser but not in asp

    I have an asp page that passes between 1 and 20 ID's in a string to another asp page where an Update is triggered. The string looks like: 10023567, 1000345, 90885543211 or it could be just one ID like: 27736458 My update stored procedure is: Update B

  • When I use my iPad for an hour or more it gets really warm to the touch, what is wrong?

    WWhen I use my iPad for an hour or more it gets really warm to the touch, what is causing this?

  • Could I get another 30 day trial?

    I think the 30 day trials adobe give us is awesome, but time sure does go by fast. I downloaded the 30 day trial for Dreamweaver, Fireworks and Photoshop. In the last 30 days I spent most of my time on lynda.com trying to learn what I could about dre

  • Dynamic JSF Content

    i need to write an html output stream to a JSF page and then include that page in another JSF page which will be the root page. Is this possible, and if so what can I attach links to these pages so that they can be viewed independently from the main/

  • Just lost my notes and have no mail!

    Just lost my notes and have no mail!