Attaching document on hierarchy nodes

Hello,
I have problems with attaching documents on hierarchy nodes. I have created a hierarchy with only postable nodes. Now it is possible to attach documents on nodes, but here I don't see any practicable option for the users to attach the document on only a node, because when they select a node and want to attach a document, in the selection of the document is this node and all nodes and leafs beneath. So the document would be shown on all nodes beneath.
Is here a good option for the users to attach documents?
I also tried to disable the resolve of hierarchy nodes as described in note 627907. Now it is no problem to attach a document on a node, but in the query the document-links aren't shown any more.
Has anybody any experience with this?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Alex

Hi,
Have you set the "Display documents for masterdata/data" in Web Application Designer?
This is a setting you make on your Table-Item.
Silje

Similar Messages

  • Assignment of documents to hierarchy nodes???

    Hi,
    We are using a NW2004s BI system.  After executing a query (BEx Launcher) and when the "Comments" button is selected, we receive the following error:
    ===========================================================
    Assignment of documents to hierarchy nodes is not supported in current KM repository for BU documents (/bw_document/InfoProviderData).
    Document will be created without assignment for characteristic OPROFIT_CTR.  Migrate documents to a CM repository
    ===========================================================
    Any hints/directions would help me a lot as we are nearing go-live.
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards,
    Praveen

    The problem is that the KF is not assigned to the hierarchy. We ran in exactly same problem. We solved it by assigning the hierarchy to the KF of which you want to create the document even though you are not showing the hierarchy.
    By the way, it seems that we are both using documents .. do you know how to change the assignment template of the document. WHere to customise the document settings ?!
    Mikkel Søndergaard

  • [RMS] Attach a document into a node of a record

    Hi,
    We have a problem inserting a document into a node of the tree of a record. When a user save the record or changes any attribute, we need to validate the record state. If the state validation is correct, we have to add a document that exists in content server with its document details ( Document Class, Document ID ) in a node.
    In Z programs we use 'BAPI_RECORD_ADDELEMENT' to this purpose, but working into the record, this change is not effective and when the save process ends the node is empty.
    Thank you very much.

    Hi,
    I have a problem with the same casuistry.
    You have managed to solve it?
    Any ideas would be welcome.
    Regards

  • Attaching documents in BI-Integrated Planning 7.0 layout

    Hello,
    We have implemented BI-IP. One of the requirements is that we provide capability to attach documents to the planning layout for 0FUNDS_CTR and 0CMMT_ITEM characteristics of our model.
    However, there is a problem. Commitment items constitute Funds Centers. The same commitment item can belong to more than 1 funds center. So, if a document is attached to a particular commitment item, and that commitment item belongs to more than 1 funds center, then the same document would show up for that commitment item on ALL the funds centers that include that commitment item. We want to change that, so that if the document it attached to a commitment item within a particular funds center, that it shows up only for the commitment item of that particular funds center and not on all funds center that include that same commitment item. How can this be accomplished?
    Thank you,
    AG

    In addition to what we discussed in this thread
    /message/4007499#4007499 [original link is broken]
    You can try with a hierarchy by keeping commitment item as the higher level and funds centres as nodes. Create authorizations on nodes which will be funds centres. Just a suggestion.
    Ravi Thothadri

  • Error while attaching document to report on Portal - Invalid selection valu

    Hello All,
    We are running our reports on Portal and as per the business requirement the users have to create comments or attach documents to certain amounts in certain columns and once they create the comment a document icon shows up near that amount (for example there are 3 columns Budget, actual, balance then the user have to create comment for some amounts which needs explanation) they do that from context menu  Documents -> Create new Comment.
    Now we want those documents to be saved on Infoprovider level and not on master data for any particular object. We have activated the flag "Characteristic is document property" on related infoobjects. We have the flag to display document icon on Infoprovider active in the web template. Now when I run the report I am able to create new comments on first two columns and when the report refreshes it shows me icon near that amount but it gives me errors on third column after the report refreshes itself. Now when I go in portal KM repository where documents are stored I do see the document that I created for the third column as well so looks like the document is getting created and being stored but the issue is when it tries to display the icon on that third column.
    The error I get is this:
    The initial exception that caused the request to fail was:
    Invalid selection value:  AttributeMember
    com.sap.ip.bi.bics.dataaccess.resource.impl.bi.exceptions.BicsResourceBwRuntimeException: Invalid selection value:  AttributeMember
    at com.sap.ip.bi.bics.dataaccess.resource.impl.bi.selector.selection.ProviderRange.setLowForced(ProviderRange.java:297)
    at com.sap.ip.bi.bics.dataaccess.resource.impl.bi.selector.selection.ProviderRange.setLow(ProviderRange.java:291)
    at com.sap.ip.bi.bics.dataaccess.resource.impl.bi.selector.selection.ProviderRange.set(ProviderRange.java:469)
    at com.sap.ip.bi.bics.dataaccess.consumer.impl.selector.selection.SingleMember.set(SingleMember.java:125)
    at com.sap.ip.bi.km.common.assignment.AssignmentMember.isContained(AssignmentMember.java:192)
    Please give some inputs if anyone is facing same problem or is anyone has worked previously with this kinda of stuff.
    Thanks in advance.
    Kiran

    Hi!
    Have you solved this problem? I have the same problem after a SPS implementation (SPS 17). The message appears when we select a single value in a DP (hierarchical filter item) that filters another one, but when I select a node it doesn't.
    Before the patch implementation the apliccation worked ok.
    Any idea?
    Thanks in advance.
    Jose

  • Drilldown to hierarchy nodes in VC..

    Hi..
    I want drilldown functionality in VC..
    1. my Query has a hierarchy
    2. my VC application has a table attached to this query.
    3. In Output the hierarchy nodes are displayed
    4. i ve taken a button Drilldown on my table
    5. on selection of a node and onclick of button all the hierarchy nodes get expanded(drilled down)
    Problem : i do not want all the nodes to get drilled down..only the selected node should get drilled..
    Plz help me out for the same...
    Thanks in advance..
    Bhavna.

    Hi,
    Just check out in hierarchy attribute setting... what is the start node for the drill down..
    Regards,
    Viren.

  • How to pass a hierarchy node variable value over OpenDocument?

    Hello,
    I have been unable to link to an instance with matching parameters with opendocument with hierarchy node variables.
    Has anyone attempted this or been successful?
    Please reference this post I had in the Web Intelligence forum.  sInstance=Param not working for sap bw query based reports (FWM 02020)
    Here's some background information
    We've created 2 new crystal reports based of sap queries.
    Report 1, single prompt, no hierarchy.
    Result : Can link to specific instance with matching parameters. Great!
    Report 2, single prompt, hierarchy based.
    Result: Cannot link to specific instance with matching parameters
    Parameter list for report 2
    [!V000001} : Cost Center/Gr{oup (Multiple) = {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    However when I go into the history and look at the successful instance parameters used, it seems to be picking up an extra parameter ( my guess is node)
    XXX, XXX & XXX; {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    We have attempted to use the entire string, the first portion, second portion, and just the technical response. No luck.
    Any help or pointers would be appreciated!
    Nick

    Hello  Ingo,
    I'll explain the situation more clearly,
    Report 2, single prompt, hierarchy based.
    Result: Cannot link to specific instance with matching parameters with a response from the Bus Objects server
    An error has occurred: The object with ID -1 does not exist in the CMS or you don't have the right to access it (FWM 02020)
    We have 1 parameter for report 2
    {!V000001} : Cost Center/Group (Multiple)
    We selected a single value:
    {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    (The XXX, XXX, & XXX is the description)
    We ran a successful instance.
    However when I go into the history and look at the successful instance parameters used it displays the following: 
    XXX, XXX & XXX; {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    An extra description seems to appear (The first XXX, XXX & XXX;) Our original selection was only {0COSTCENTER   XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    We attempted to build variations of the open document strings
    1. We tried the entire parameter response,
    XXX, XXX & XXX; {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    2. The first description that was not part of the original selection,
    XXX, XXX & XXX
    3. The technical name and description
    {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE} - XXX, XXX & XXX
    4. The technical name
    {0COSTCENTER XXXXXXXX.BGT3}.{XXXXXXXXX.BGT3 0HIER_NODE}
    Please let me know if you need more details.
    Regards,
    Nick

  • Insert new hierarchy nodes for key figures

    Hi All,
    In BI 7.0. when you right click on the key figure folder , you get an option called " insert new hierarchy node". Can anyone please explain what is this feature for. Is is just for reporting purpose where you can drill down for a particular key figure for more clarity. Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Satish

    Hi,
    This is for reporting purpose.
    For example you have four key figures which consists the "TOTAL DEMAND".
    Suppose TOTAL DEMAND = Purchase Requistion + Planned Order + Purchase Order + Production Order
    We may provide hierarchy on TOTAL DEMAND, so that in display you may expand TOTAL DEMAND. When expanding TOTAL DEMAND it will show all four key figures with the total numbers in TOTAL DEMAND.
    You may refer follwoing document as well.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/c6e6ed94-0501-0010-2886-b6944515cfd9
    I hope it will help.
    Thanks,
    S

  • Constructing a new Document from External Nodes

    Constructing a new Document from External Nodes
    I have a situation where:
    1.     I have an existing XML Document
    2.     I need to parse for specific Nodes under varying conditions
    3.     Once the Node is identified -- I would like to append this node as a new Node in a new Document
    Is this possible? The methods in the API do not lend themselves to attaching a Node that was not explicitly created by the target Document.

    Hummm�
    That works, sort of; it does allow the node to be imported, but at the Document level only. I will need to apply this at various Node (Element) points, which the API does not permit.
    Thanks for the info.

  • Exception (Aggregation) in Hierarchy nodes results

    Hi All,
    We have a requirement to sum all values (as results in hierarchy levels) based on the value of a specific characteristics. example as below is what we want to achieve. Country, Product group, materials are all characteristics and this is viewed as hierarchy in the query. In each material there is a calculation components that will shown the value of Sales Qty, Price/unit and Amount. What we want is to sum up ONLY the Amount value and presented in the hierarchy nodes so that we can see how much sales we did by product group and subsequently by country as whole. If we drill across we will be able to achieve this but we want to drill down as we have the time characteristics and variances at the columns. and no, we do not want user to drill across the calculation components. This query is used in Integrated Planning for planning purposes integrated with BO and that is the structure of the planning layout we want. "Calculation component" is a infoobject that contains 'sales qty', 'price/unit' and 'sales amount' as master data values. 
    I have tried exception aggregation on calc component infoobject for 'LAST VALUE'. and it did capture only the Sales Amount value as result for node Calc Components. But the other results node State, country and Region also takes LAST VALUE.. which is not what i want. what i want is esseentially summation of all Sales amount for each calculation components by state, country and region.
                                                       Last Year  |  Variance   | Current Year |   Jan | Feb | Mar |......
    Region X                                              200  (sum of all country's sales amount)
    ->Country A                                          200  (sum of all states' sales amount) 
       -> State Y1                                          80 (sum of all components's sales amount)
           ->Calc Components Z1                    30
              - Sales Qty                                   10
              - Price/Unit                                     3
              - Sales Amount                             30
          ->Calc Components Z2                    50
              - Sales Qty                                     5 
              - Price/Unit                                   10
              - Sales Amount                             50
       -> State Y2                                        120
           ->Calc Components Z1                   40
              - Sales Qty                                   10
              - Price/Unit                                     4
              - Sales Amount                             40
          ->Calc Components Z2                    80
              - Sales Qty                                   10 
              - Price/Unit                                     8
              - Sales Amount                             80
    any help would be appreciated...
    eddie

    Please try the below steps and I hope it should work for you.
    Instead of calculated keyfigures,try to use local formula .Because i think sometimes CKF will not give the expected result if you use exception aggregation (not sure though,but i used only local formulas)
    1. Create a first local keyfigure (Say F1)for the calculation and use exception aggreagation as 'Average' and reference characteristics as 'PDU'.
    2. Create  a second keyfigure ( Say F2) using the first keyfigure(F1) and use exception aggregation as 'Average' and reference characteristics as 'Sales Document', if you need the values based on average of the sales documents and hide the first keyfigure(F1)
    I consider Sales document is the first level and PDU is the second level ( i mean lowest  level) . Because you need to consider these sequencens as well when you design the exception aggregation.
    Likewise you can create nested aggregations based on your requirements.
    Please do let me know if it works.
    Thanks.

  • How to determine partner according to higer hierarchy node?

    Hi Experts:
    I need to determine a partner in a sales document according to partner in higher (pricing) hierarchy node.
    I user access sequence wizard and hierarchy was not available as source for determination.
    I tried sourc CRM_PARTNER_G assigning it manually to access sequence. But it does not work.
    Any idea??
    Best regards,
    Cristina

    Any idea????
    Edited by: Cristina Martillo on Nov 18, 2010 9:30 PM

  • Download of hierarchy nodes and accounts from BW

    Hi,
    Does anyone know how to download a list of the hierarchy nodes and accounts out of BW? I need the list to work on some analysis and documentation.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Jackie,
    Have you seen this document:How to Download a Hierarchy to a Flat File
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/0403a990-0201-0010-38b3-e1fc442848cb
    Hope this helps...

  • SEM-BPS: Variables of type hierarchy node user exit

    Hi,
    I read the "How to.." document "Variables of Type Exit".
    This document has example for variable type caracteristic.
    I need to use this kind of solution for global variables:
    I have the same variables in several planning areas. I have defined one ‘leading’ area containing the variable that should automatically set/adjust the corresponding variables in the other planning areas.
    I've created a SEM variable of type hierarchy node and with the replacement type user exit. There is a standard function module API_SEMBPS_VARIABLE_GETDETAIL which has to provide the selected hierarchy node in leading area to other areas.
    The function works ideally in test mode, but it doesn't work as the SEM user exit.
    Does anyone have experience in this problem?
    Thanks

    Your function module shall follow the expected interface (required for exit type). Function API_SEMBPS_VARIABLE_GETDETAIL is not for such usage.
    To see an example FM that is fit for a 'user exit' processing for hierarchy node, have a look at FM UPF_VARIABLE_USER_EXIT_HIER. There is inline documentation in the source code that shall help you create your own FM if required.
    cheers,

  • How to filter hierarchy node in BEX query designer

    Dear experts
    We are working on FI balance sheet with hierarchy infoobject 0GLACCEXT. Example of our balance sheet is as follow:
    Parent Node A = 20
         Sub-parent Node A1 = 10
             Leaf A11 = 5
                 Leaf A12 = 5
    Parent Node B = 20
         Sub-parent Node B1 = 10
                   Leaf B11 = 5
                   Leaf B12 = 5
    We require only:
        Sub-parent Node A1 = 10
        Leaf B12 = 5
    So I filter those out in BEX restriction;  however, after we examine the report in tcode RSRT, "Sub-parent Node A1" is not shown in BEX Report, and the result is as follow:
    Parent Node B = 5
         Sub-parent Node B1 = 5
                 Leaf B12 = 5
    Are there solutions for us to show merely A1 and B12 ?

    Hi Chu
    Try the following steps.
    Initial Output
    In this example I will restrict the query for only displaying Node 8603 and leaf 9000
    Proceed to restrict the Characteristic. Please be aware of the difference between hierarchy nodes and leaf characteristic values. Also set the Hierarchy display properties to expand up to level 1.
    Execute the query again:
    Please be aware that users will still be able to expand node 8603 and see the lower level nodes/leaf. In order to restrict users from doing this set up users authorizations.
    Regards,
    Carlos

  • DSO or ODS "Insert New Hierarchy Nodes" under Data Fields

    When you insert info objects under the Data Fields in DSO right mouse click on the Data Fields icon and you will find Insert New Hierarchy Nodes . I created a hierarchy node with infoobjects associating with it which will be visible under the Filters Folder in BEx Query designer as a seperate folder. I can add them to the infoobjects from this folder into the query. I did not know how to apply this functionality in Queries and what it really does. My guess was you can create dynamic hierarchy using characteristic infoobjects from transactional data.Any ideas or links to documentation. This option was available from 7.X in DSO's and i think even in 3.x ODS.

    Hi,
    May help you:----
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/4a/e71f39488fee0ce10000000a114084/content.htm
    You could feel the flexibility of using this hierarchial display in the Query. Try to create any Query on this DSO.
    Regards,
    Suman

Maybe you are looking for