Attachment available in integration scenario

Hi Experts
I have a query. I would be soon going to do an implementation of sap cloud with crm onPremise. It will involve replication of opportunity, activity etc back & forth.
My question is : Do attachments attached to opportunity or activity in onPremise system will be available in cloud system as well implementing PI as middleware using integration guide given by SAP. Reason for the question is that i do not see a way for Idoc or weservice to send attachments.
Have you seen this available as standard integration working in cloud solution.
Thanks
Apoorva

Hi Apoorva,
You can see the screenshot i have highlighted the Inbound and Outbound Service.
Please try this and let me know it will helpful or not.
Many Thanks
Mithun

Similar Messages

Integration scenarios ending in errors in HCI since the upgrade.

Hi all,
   We were having C4C-ERP integration scenarios working via HCI.
Please note that with the 1405 upgrade, all our HCI scenarios stopped running.
Whenever we are triggering an outbound from C4C, getting the below message:
Error in HCI : Inbound processing in endpoint at https://iflmaptr103h0108avtaiot-h0108.intaas.hana.ondemand.com/cxf/COD/ERP/OPPORTUNITY_FOLLOWUP
failed with message "[CXF][General][Exception]:Could not send Message.", caused by "NotAfter: Mon Jun 02 17:27:40 UTC 2014”
Not sure if anybody faced any issues in HCI after the upgrade. Kindly let me know.
Thanks.
Suvankar

Hi Ginger,
Here is the error log from webservice monitor:
======================
<ERROR_CONTEXT>
<ERROR_INFO>
    <HTTP_ERROR_TEXT>Internal Server Error</HTTP_ERROR_TEXT>
    <_--3CSOAP_FAULT_--3E>No faultstring available</_--3CSOAP_FAULT_--3E>
</ERROR_INFO>
<CONSUMER_INFO>
    <INTERFACE_NAME>FollowupDocumentCreationRequestFromOpportunityCreationOut</INTERFACE_NAME>
    <INTERFACE_NAMESPACE>http://sap.com/xi/AP/CRM/Global</INTERFACE_NAMESPACE>
    <CONSUMER_PROXY>CO_APCRM_OPP_SUCC_CREATION_OUT</CONSUMER_PROXY>
    <LOGICAL_PORT>1_63E05B5501ED3AEA45F03C421CA30</LOGICAL_PORT>
    <OPERATION_NAME>FollowupDocumentRequestCreation</OPERATION_NAME>
    <OPERATION_NAMESPACE>http://sap.com/xi/AP/CRM/Global</OPERATION_NAMESPACE>
    <PROCESSING_UNIT>Sector 2: Consumer</PROCESSING_UNIT>
    <PROCESSING_MODE>Asynchronous</PROCESSING_MODE>
    <PROCESSING_TYPE>Remote</PROCESSING_TYPE>
    <WORK_PROCESS_NUMBER>109</WORK_PROCESS_NUMBER>
    <WORK_PROCESS_PID>30511</WORK_PROCESS_PID>
</CONSUMER_INFO>
<TRANSPORT_INFO>
    <PROTOCOL>https</PROTOCOL>
    <AUTHENTICATION_METHOD>sapsp:HTTPX509</AUTHENTICATION_METHOD>
    <AUTH_METHOD_X509_KEYSTORE_VIEW>DFAULT</AUTH_METHOD_X509_KEYSTORE_VIEW>
    <TARGET_HOST_NAME>iflmaptr103h0108avtaiot-h0108.intaas.hana.ondemand.com</TARGET_HOST_NAME>
    <TARGET_PORT_NUMBER>443</TARGET_PORT_NUMBER>
    <TARGET_PATH>/cxf/COD/ERP/OPPORTUNITY_FOLLOWUP</TARGET_PATH>
    <PROXY_HOST_NAME>proxy-nsq</PROXY_HOST_NAME>
    <PROXY_PORT_NUMBER>8080</PROXY_PORT_NUMBER>
</TRANSPORT_INFO>
</ERROR_CONTEXT>
======================
Payload details attached.
Kindly let me know.
Thanks.
Suvankar

XI Integration scenario for material replication from SRM to SRM-MDM

Hi Guys,
We are working with the following landscape:
SRM Server 5.5
ECC 6.0
SRM-MDM 5.5 SP6
PI 2005_1_700 SP0006
I have a question for you about replication of the material master form SRM EBP to SRM-MDM.
In XI we are trying to configure this scenario. For this we have imported the following XI Content:
- SAP SRM Server 5.5
- SAP SRM-MDM 2.0
We have the following problem; that when tring to configure the this scenario we are getting GUID errors. Probable because some XI content is missing. In the SRM-MDM 2.0 XI content we also see that SRM 6.0 scenario's are avilable in the currenlty imported XI content, but when clicking on 'Edit action' in these scenario's we are getting the following error:
"Software component version with GUID XXXXXXXXXX... does not exists"
Can any one tell me why SRM 6.0 scenario's are availble in the XI content for SRM-MDM 2.0, and which additional XI content we need to import to get rid of these GUID error's?
Becasue of this the configuration in the Integration Directory fails.Transfering the integration scenario to the Integration directory gives a couple of errors: "Unable to load action. Check whether all necessary actions have been released in the integration repository".
Hopefully some of you know what to do, because I am currenlty stuck....... Do we need to import additional XI content, or maybe the Xi content for SRM 6.0. If so where can I get the XI content for SRM 6.0. It is not available on the SAP Support portal as a download.
Thx In advance.
Regards,
Wouter

Hi,
>"Software component version with GUID XXXXXXXXXX... does not exists"
try updating SLD (CIM DATA) with the latest patch available
Regards,
Michal KRawczyk

Integration scenario for Centralized Emergency Access and Helpdesk / CHARM

Hi,
Is any of you aware of a scenario doc between GRC and SOLMAN? Since Change Requests are referred in GRC, I assume there is an integrated scenario...
Thanks in advance,
Best regards,
Ádá

Can Firefighter logon using the Netweaver Business Client to launch Firefighter ID?
- No, GRAC_SPM is the way to go.
Is that mandate to use GRC system to launch Firefighter ID using GRAC_SPM transaction code? or can the user logon to local system as well?
- Yes. However, the option would be nice to have a workaround in case GRC is down
What about Portal based system Firefighting functionality? Can we have Firefighter IDs on Netweaver Java system?
- As far as I know only for transactional SAP systems.
Will I be able to grant a Firefighter ID to a Firefighter User on hourly basis?
- Same as answered already - no.
For initial setup , how the initial data load of Firefighter Ids Owners, Controllers and Firefighter Users can be done? Are there options like load from Excel or CSV available as part of setup toolset?
- Same as answered already - no.

Configuration Scenario for BPM Using Integration Scenario

hi All,
I Have an Scenario where i am using BPM. Most of the blog tells about manually creating all Configuration objects. I had created an Integration Scenario for this scenario by referring to the earlier threads available for same.
Hoe to Create Integration Scenario for BPM Scenario
Integration Scenario in BPM and few more.
My IS looks like
Sender App Component - Integration Process - Receiver App Component
Now when i am trying to create Configuration scenario for same using model configurator, i am getting Model as "Not Configurable"
And when i click "Configurability Check" Button, i am getting below as status:
Component view IS_POC_BPM: Connection from receivePayload to getABSPayload does not have an inbound service interface
Component view IS_POC_BPM : Connection from sendABSPayload to getPayload has no outbound interface
getABSPayload and sendABSPayload are actions for Abstract interfaces.
IS_POC_BPM is the Integration Process Name.
Also in Integration Scenario, when i create connection between sender action to BPM action there is no inbound interface coming. And viceversa.
Please help me in identifying if i am doing any thing wrong in creating this scenario.
Is it possible to create Configuration Scenario for BPM Using Integration Scenario?
Thanks,
Mayank
Edited by: Mayank Gupta on Apr 21, 2010 6:35 AM

I think you shoudl refer the available Integration Scenarios created for BPMs in IR --> SAP BASIS --> http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/Patterns
Sender template will have the Action with Outbound Service Interface and then in the BPM Template the action will have Inbound Interface.....then within the BPM itself this inbound will be mapped to Action with Abstract Interface
may be after looking the Integration scenarios you will get more idea
Regards,
Abhishek.

Integration scenario in XI Content Package (Certification)

Hi,
During the design of an integration scenario for certication of XI-Content you have to define the application components. Should all application components be defined as "templates"???
In my case I have to define an integration scenario between an SAP product/component (not part of the SLD) and a third party software...
Thanks and regards!

Hi Christian,
if you use standard IDoc's delivered by SAP you should take them from software component SAP APPL (in case of R/3 IDoc's). If you need to use them in a BPM scenario, just create a dependency to this software component. Without BPM the dependency is not necessary.
If your IDoc's are specific to the industry solution O&G, the IDoc's are probably not yet uploaded by SAP. In this case you should contact ICC and the will take care of this issue (either they make sure that the IDoc's are available by SAP or they tell you to upload them into your SWC).
Regards,
Claus

Threshold for Messages in integration scenario?

Hi,
Can we set threshold (time) for Messages in integration scenario?
Thanks,
Nagarjuna.

Hi Earlence,
> 1. Is it possible to search for messages sent to PI (7.1) via TREX and monitor their status?
Status I am not aware, but we can search the messages based on the content.
Its external search engine for SAP, we can buy this and install in the XI server.
ex : Suppose we have an order number, we don't no in which scenario it is used then we give
this number to the TREX then it searches and gives that scenarion name.
> 2. Search should be possible based on various criteria like Sender/Receiver Component/Interface, Business system name etc.
TREX is based on a client/server architecture. The client component is integrated into the application that uses the TREX functions, and allows communication with the TREX servers.The server component processes the requests; it indexes and classifies documents and answers search queries.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/78df2a46-0a01-0010-ef81-a6
be60cc5cfd
> 3. Is there a Java API so that this can be done programmatically?
May be available but this is not easy.
> 4. Some resources for the same?
/people/prasad.illapani/blog/2005/11/14/payload-based-message-search-in-xi30-using-trex-engine
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/70/0837ced133304eba452c45b6047c74/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/78df2a46-0a01-0010-ef81-a6be60cc5cfd
Regards
Ramesh

Counting Integration scenario in SAP XI

Hi All,
Is it possible to count all message flow (Sender+receiver combination) available in system. I have one case where i want to find all message flow available in XI (not in SXMB_MONI).
I have following question:
1> Can I use Interface mapping for this purpose? ( but Interface mapping is not mandatory in many cases)
2> Is Receiver determination can be used?
3> Is there any other possible way by which I can identify message flow uniquely in Repository or Directory?
Any help will be appreciated.
Regards,
Gourav

Hi Michal,
Thanks for your prompt reply, but still some questions left un-answered.
3> Is there any other possible way by which I can identify message flow uniquely in Repository or Directory?
Should I use combination of Mapping, Integration scenario, split mapping to identify unique message flow because it is very important for me to identify unique message flow exist in system whether it is executed or not.
thanks again for your reply, ur answere really helpful.

Monitoring Interfaces /Integration Scenario's

Hi,
I got a task of Monitoring integration scenario's.
What are the other option available except: Data at Receiving application, RWB, Integration Engine and J2EE logs
to monitor interfaces.
How to do Error Handling in the case of file2file scenario?.

Hi,
There are some good documents available in SDN for XI monitoring, check the following links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/06/5d1741b393f26fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/advancedsearch?query=ximonitoirngguide
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/09/07/xi-why-dont-start-searching-for-all-errors-from-one-place
For J2EE monitoring :
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e63ad672-0801-0010-c5b2-ea75cfffb423
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/39/83682615cd4f8197d0612529f2165f/content.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/fc03a2a2-0a01-0010-b497-87518550e132
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c3/6fff40e39ba854e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
For file 2 file error handlimg, as mentioned above, you can set up CCMS Alerts:
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/11/24/xi-configuring-ccms-monitoring-for-xi-part-i
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/12/05/xi-grmg-customizing-for-xi-ccms-heartbeat-monitoring-part-ii
Also, a good blog talking about the main XI Production error:
/people/prashanth.azharuddin/blog/2006/11/24/some-errors-in-an-xi-production-environment
Rgds,
Puneet
Edited by: Puneet Singhal on Aug 19, 2009 8:25 AM

Building an Integration scenario with the Foundation Pack

From what I can see most people use AIA so they can make use of the available PIPS.
Has anybody used just the AIA Foundation pack to build integration scenarios?
We are experiencing many problems just trying to develope a simple end to end process and wondered if anyone had a simple Do's and DOn'ts, or Step by step guide to developing a scenario.
There is a lot of documentation and its very difficult to find the relevant information as it seems to be spread across multiple docs.
Stuart

We have made some small progress using the Foundation Pack 2.3.
I thought i'd share some of my experiences for others who are having problems and finding it difficult to get info.
We used the Artifcat Generater which creates the ABCS (BPEL process).
We found several issue:
1. In ABCS Requester (which calls an EBS implemented as an ESB process) - Partner Links did not work. We were getting Invalid Port Type errors (i will post the error message when i'm back in the office), but on close inspection everything looked ok but just did not work. The simple work around was to delete the Partner Link and re-enter it manually. I wasted days investigating this problem and ended up creating my own test BPEL process calling the EBS to prove it was configured correctly.
2. The XSL stylesheets could not be tested in JDEV. We ended up commenting out many of the generated XSL templates (generated by the Artifact Generater), the main culprit seems to be GetSenderNode template, haven't got to the bottom of the issue but ended up commenting out much of the code, specifically the aia.Getxxxxxx functions. Once I get time and find more information i'll post my findings.
Good luck.

HELP IN INTEGRATION SCENARIOS

I have the following situation:
I have seven systems. This 7 systems create an text files, that must be load by SAP ECCC.
The scenario is the following:
               NON-SAP-Systems --> XI --> SAP ECC
And I have other scenario when, SAP ECC generate a file, and one of the systems must read this file
          SAP ECC --> XI --> NON-SAP-System
Please, I need a recommendation, about which is the best form of implement this integration scenarios.
Thank you very much
regards
Dario

>
Hernan Dario Rodriguez Sanchez wrote:
> I have the following situation:
>
> I have seven systems. This 7 systems create an text files, that must be load by SAP ECCC.
>
> The scenario is the following:
>
>                NON-SAP-Systems --> XI --> SAP ECC
>
> And I have other scenario when, SAP ECC generate a file, and one of the systems must read this file
>
>           SAP ECC --> XI --> NON-SAP-System
>
> Please, I need a recommendation, about which is the best form of implement this integration scenarios.
>
> Thank you very much
>
> regards
> Dario
The best way to communicate with a SAP ECC system is proxy....but what if you have a RFC configured at the ECC system...then in such a case you have to use RFC communication.....you also have an option of using an IDOC....
it totally depends on how your SAP-ECC wants to send/receive the data
using proxy or IDOC also depends on the version of your SAP ECC system...
In both of your scenarios you can make a search on SDN to check if there is any blog available on how to carry out the configuration....suppose your non-SAP system is JDBC then make a search JDBC to SAP....and you will get lot of info....
Regards,
Abhishek.

Unable to Load the Integration scenario into the Integration directory

Hi All,
I am new to using SAP XI.
Require your help on the following issue.
I have built an Integration scenario, added Component Type: Product Version, inserted actions and connections.
I did check for any errors. I found no errors.
When I am trying to load this scenario into the Integration directory its not showing up the scenario in the popup.
Navigation:
Directory > tools> Transfer scenario from repository
The status of Integration Scenario in the builder shows as
"Being processed".
I created the scenario 2 days back.
Can some one help me in this?
Regards,
Meher

Hi All,
Thanks to all who helped me.
michal,divija : Can you please let me know in details how to activate Business Scenario?
I did not create any business process.
Sridhar: I did releases some locks on my process, no luck.
Can you please explain me in more details?
Should I have a process build for my Integration scenario to be activated?
Thanks,
Meher

The userexit is not working in integration scenario- inb. delivery creation

Hi Experts please help,
We know that vl31n is for inbound delivery creation.
in one of the userexits of vl31n, I did code ( shifting the batch to vendor batch )...
So,the user enters batch number under batch field and
fill all other required information and saves to create inbound delivery.
Whilw inbound delivery creation my coding in user exit gets executed and shifts the batch number to Vendor batch field.
This we observed when we check in vl32n or vl33n, the batch entered shifted to Vendor batch field() batch field is space.
This is working fine with vl31n inb. delivery creation.
But in integration testing it failed.
In Integration, what is happening the other system called "ICH" is creating ASN (shipping note) with the batch number, which inturn created the inbound delivery in R/3 via XI as shown like below.
Integration scenario :
ICH System (ASN) --> XI --> R/3 System (Inb. delivery creation)
So when "ICH" triggers ASN to R/3 the inbound delivery creation is happening but the batch number is not shifting to vendor batch field.
when we open the inbound delivery in vl32n, the batch number is under batch field only...it should be under vendor batch field.
My understanding is my user exit coding of vl31n not getting executed in the integration process.
Kindly help me what can I do to shift the batch sending from ICH to shift to vendor batch field.
Please let me know if I could not explain the scenario.
THANKS IN advance.
YOUR HELP WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.

the ASN from ICH, it uses a standard idoc function module IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1 and there is one user exit EXIT_SAPLV55K_012 which calls ZXTRKU07
need to code there.
solved by meetings with some other experts.
THANKS.

Adding a new reciever to an existing integration scenario of conf in PI7.0

Hi SapAll.
here i have got a requirement to add one more reciever to an existing integration scenario in Integration Directory(Configuration).
this Integration scenario is for sending the idoc MATMAS.MATMAS05 From 5 Different SAP-R/3 Systems to 2 Recievers.
here iam using 5 different business systems with idoc communication channels for sending idocs and 2 business systems for recieving idocs in file format with file adapters.
so when iam trying to create new reciever detarmination or Interface Determination, it says object already exists.
but i can created reciever agreement without any error.
so can anybody guide me on how to create the Interface,Reciever Determinations without any error.
regards.
Varma

now i just created a new business system with file communication channel
Why have a Business System for a FILE channel? We normaly use Business Component/ Service.
You mentioned IDOC SENDER channels....why? For IDOC we just create Receiver channels...unless you want to specify IDOC packaging.
when iam trying to create a reciever detarmination from one of the existing sender system say like BUS_SENDER2 to new
reciver system ex:NEW_BUS_RECIEVER it says object already exists.
Receiver Determination can have the same BUS_SENDER2 system/ service as sender....but it should not have the same Interface Name....this is where PI is throwing the error.
There already exists a Receiver Detremination with BUS_SENDER2 as source system and the same message interface.
You can reuse the same RD by just entering one more receiver system/ service below the already existing one (in the RD)
In short just search your ID and you will see a RD created with the source details which you are trying to use.
If you want to see a difference, then create a new sender service/ system and then use this to create the RD!
Regards,
Abhishek.

SOAP receiver starting the integration scenario

Hello experts,
I am searching for a way to start an integration scenario with a SOAP receiver in the same way it is possible with JDBC sender (with a pool interval).
The scenario is: I need to execute a webservice, getting information from it, and send this information to an abap proxy on ECC side.
I thought about creating a ccBPM with a loop (with no end) and a wait step for doing it... although it works, I think it is not the best way for doing it.
Thanks for your suggestions!
regards.
Roberti

Thank you guys.
Let me explain the scenario in a better way.
The scenario is:
1 - Automatically execute a partner webservice sync call with constant parameters.
2 - Get the webservice response.
3 - Map the response to get required information.
4 - Send this information to an Abap proxy.
5 - Process the information to proper abap objects.
Note: This scenario needs to be automatically executed every 30 minutes.
The purpose of this scenario is to GET documents (xml) from a partner web service and import the information to ECC, continuously, each 30 minutes. So, no one is supposed to start the process, it should be automatically triggered. The goal is exactly the same we have with JDBC or file sender adapter, where we can set a 30 minutes interval to automatically execute an sql statement in the database or read a file in a path.
JAVAGUY and Stefan Grube, I did it in this way. But, scheduling an Abap job to start the proxy -> webservice -> proxy scenario, the Abap job is the RESPONSIBLE for the scenario. If something wrong occurs with that job schedule, the integration will stop working. I would prefer PI as responsible for the process, so I can have alerts and other execution guarantees.
Abhishek Salvi and Pratik_du, I think that the scenario is clear now, don't it? About the ccBPM, this is another way I implemented the solution. I created a ccBPM with
1 - A receiver that I execute just once
2 - One loop with a condition 1 = 1 (infinite)
2a (Into the loop) - A send step to execute the webservice sync call
2b (Into the loop) - A receiver step to get the webservice response
2c (Into the loop) - A map step to transform the information I need
2d (Into the loop) - A send step to send the information to the Abap proxy
2e (Into the loop) - A wait step to wait 30 minutes until execute the next step of the loop
IIn this case, I will have a ccBPM running continuously and doing the job.
I posted the question because I'm not sure which solution is better, and check if you can see another way to make PI the responsible for starting a scenario with a soap receiver like this.
Thank you again.
Roberti

Attachment available in integration scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for