Attachment transfer of PO from SRM to Back end for extended classic scenario

Hi Experts,
     We are using the SRM 7.0 with EHP 701 and ECC 6 , we have a SRM requirement where we need to transfer the attachment of a PO to back end ECC. I tried to implement the note 1594966 , but it doesn't work . we are using Extended classic scenario. Please suggest some SAP notes or the procedure to be followed to achieve this.
Thanks ,
Aishwarya.M

As far as I am aware this functionality of transferring attachment is not supported in Ext classic scneario  
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1873708
Also  I suggest you should debug and see if its sending attachment from SRM if yes then
could be something missing at ECC side , To debug use this
http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=340264144
 You may also check in SXI_monitor and see if attachment is being recieved and sent from SRM and ECC respectively
Are you configuring this for the 1 st time or its an error which u encountered?
You must raise a NOte to SAP for the same till a solution is found .
This one is another which you can check ..
http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/Transfering+shopping+cart+attachments+to+the+backend+system

Similar Messages

  • PO output for Extended classic Scenario from the R/3 backend

    Hi,
    1) Does the PO output (ignoring the config maintained in SRM server 5.5 for the output) through R/3 backend is standard or it is mandatory to give local outputs from SRM only incase of Extended classic scenario?
    Regards,
    DV

    Hi Anil,
    We are working on extended classic scenario with SRM 5.0 & ECC6.0.
    Please explain how we can take "PO output for Extended classic Scenario from the R/3 backend ". 
    Please send the related document to [email protected]
    Thanks in advance
    Ashutosh

  • Transfer of Shopping Cart (SRM) to Back End Syetem (R/3)

    Hi experts,
    We have just upgraded to SRM 5.0 with SRM Server 5.5 (SP 0008). We have moved our EBP application from Requisite to CCM. In our old application we have created some customer fields in the shopping Cart and will be moving the data from the shopping cart to Back end (R/3).
    In R/3 EXIT SRM_PO is implemented to get the customer fields into Purchase Requisition. Now after moving to SRM 5.0, we are able to reproduce the customer Fields in Shopping Cart. But the data in those customer fields are not moved to Back end (R/3). Earlier BADI   ' BBP_CREATE_REQ_BACK  ' & ' BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK  '  is implemented and in new BADI's
    " BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW " & " BBP_CREATE_BE_RQ_NEW " is implemented as well which in turn calls the Old BADI's.
    In this situation, i would like to know the following,
    1. How the Shopping Cart data is transfered to Back end (R/3). Once we know this we can find whether Customer fields are getting transfered to Back end by Debugging.
    2. Is there any RFC or IDocs doing this transfer.
    Your replies will certainly help in my further analysis.
    Best regards,
    Prabahar N.R

    Hi,
    BAPI_PO_CREATE1 and BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE are used to create either PO or requisition in the backend in the classic scenario.
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • Transfer of Pricing Conditions from SRM 5.0 to ECC (Extended Classic)

    Hi All,
    I am currently doing an enhancement on a copy of function module B46B_DPO_TRANSFER and the implementation of BBP_DRIVER_DETERMINE BAdI that will call the copied FM to transfer the pricing conditions from SRM 5.0 to ECC since in standard only net price is being transferred to ECC.
    During the creation of PO, everything is ok. All conditions are transferred to ECC.
    But we are encountering problems in the replication from SRM to ECC when changes are done in the PO during deleting or inserting a condition to an item. Our problem is in figuring out what will trigger us to use Change types U, I, E, D in populating the CHANGE_ID field in POCOND table that will be used in BBP_PO_INBOUND function module.
    During creation of PO, I have set POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'I' on all conditions to be transferred.
    When there are modifications on a PO, I have set POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'U' and I am encountering problem when new conditions are inserted to an item since it will not be displayed (which I believe in this case, POCOND-CHANGE_ID should be 'I'), and when deleting a condition to an item.
    I would like to ask, if there is an indicator that a condition will be inserted to an item for us to assign POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'I', and for us to assign POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'D' when a condition will be deleted.
    By the way, I used FM BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL (exporting: E_PRIDOC) to get the PO conditions to be transferred and have checked E_PRIDOC-DEL_IND to check if a condition will be deleted. Unfortunately, it is not working on the deletion since it seems that DEL_IND field is not being populated if a condition will be deleted.
    Many thanks,
    Kezia
    Edited by: Kezia Layug on Mar 3, 2009 4:24 PM

    Hi All,
    I am currently doing an enhancement on a copy of function module B46B_DPO_TRANSFER and the implementation of BBP_DRIVER_DETERMINE BAdI that will call the copied FM to transfer the pricing conditions from SRM 5.0 to ECC since in standard only net price is being transferred to ECC.
    During the creation of PO, everything is ok. All conditions are transferred to ECC.
    But we are encountering problems in the replication from SRM to ECC when changes are done in the PO during deleting or inserting a condition to an item. Our problem is in figuring out what will trigger us to use Change types U, I, E, D in populating the CHANGE_ID field in POCOND table that will be used in BBP_PO_INBOUND function module.
    During creation of PO, I have set POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'I' on all conditions to be transferred.
    When there are modifications on a PO, I have set POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'U' and I am encountering problem when new conditions are inserted to an item since it will not be displayed (which I believe in this case, POCOND-CHANGE_ID should be 'I'), and when deleting a condition to an item.
    I would like to ask, if there is an indicator that a condition will be inserted to an item for us to assign POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'I', and for us to assign POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'D' when a condition will be deleted.
    By the way, I used FM BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL (exporting: E_PRIDOC) to get the PO conditions to be transferred and have checked E_PRIDOC-DEL_IND to check if a condition will be deleted. Unfortunately, it is not working on the deletion since it seems that DEL_IND field is not being populated if a condition will be deleted.
    Many thanks,
    Kezia
    Edited by: Kezia Layug on Mar 3, 2009 4:24 PM

  • From SRM to R3 po in extended classic  : UNICODE PROGRAM ERROR

    1.Today I observed that while sending the PO data from SRM to R3 we are getting following error -
    "Data objects in a Unicode program are not convertible"
    Request you to please look into it on priority.
    SEKHAR

    short dump(UC_OBJECTS_NOT_CONVERTIBLE)
    Data objects in a Unicode program are not convertible?what does this mean?
    Virtual Char error - UC_OBJECTS_NOT_CONVERTIBLE
    /message/1069612#1069612 [original link is broken]

  • SRM SUS using PI in Extended Classic Scenario

    Hi SRM Gurus,
    We are in SRM 5.0 ,extended classic scenrio and plan to implement SUS for PO create/Change,PO response and
    ASN.We plan to use PI for this integration and as per Note 573383 our IT team plans to use two different client
    (one for EBP) and other for SUS.Does anyone have a config guide for this scenario??
    In this scenario what all configuration are to be done on SRM(EBP) side??Do I need to configure PO/PO response and ASN  number ranges for SUS?
    Do I need to create a new vendor org structure in SUS client so that I can replicate SRM/EBP vendor to SUS??
    What all settings are to be done on PI side.
    Any help/documentation  in this direction would be appreciated.
    Kind Regards,
    Priya

    few answers to your questions
    1) what is the release of SRM  you want to work with?
    2) services in SUS is not available as standard , and will be provided by SAP as consulting up on request.
    3) for hardware requirements , please refer to the master guide for the srm release you will be working on -->
    and also you can refer to the software component matrix in master guide --> to see if any component is mandatory..
    4) XI and MDM as far as i know is mandatory for SRM 6.0 and above , But in SRM 5.0 , XI is compulsory.
    5) so xi is mandatory in anyway in SUS as different systems are involved and therefore is required for routing the documents correctly.
    6) time for installation again depends on your supplier base , and your level of expertise.
    7) it is not always recommended to compare between two different systems , R/3 and SUS are different and so functionality will not be the same
    8) but as far as i know R/3 is stronger functioanlly..

  • Extended classic scenario to Classic scenarioc in SRM.??

    someone pls tell me how to change from Extended classic scenario to Classic scenarion while creating in shopping cart...?
    I am using BADI "BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI" change to classic scenarion from extending classic..but i got confused about source code..So i request any one can help me for suitable source code..

    Hi
    Do you mean to say that you have set up Extended Classic Scenario but you want to change it to Classic Scenario?... If this is the case, remove the activation in COnfiguration for Extended classic scenario and deactivate BADIs you ve implemented for Extended Classic
    OR
    Do you want to change it to Classic only for the Document user is creating.--> Read the indicator or data from SC and decide whether the document has to be in Classic or Extended classic SCenario.... The BADI will either have Extended classic = X or NOT.... so there is no parameter for classic Scen... Depending on your requirements, implement the ext. classic badi to SET it or NOT set it...
    Regards
    Virender SIngh

  • PO text transfer to Back-end in case of Extended Classic Scenario in SRM 4.

    Dear experts,
    My system is in SRM 4.0 in Extended Classic Scenario. We use in the PO internal note text and vendor But thses texts are not transfered to Back-end.
    Is it normal?
    Do I need to customize something?
    Can it be achieved by BADi? How then?
    OR is it only possible from SRM 5.0?
    Thanks in advance
    RD

    Yes you can do this. Implement BADI BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW, Refer parameter IS_SC_DOCUMENT>LONGTEXT,  and CS_PO_DOCUMENT>IT_PO_ITEM_TEXT. Map the exact text-id of the R/3.
    Note: if this BADI is not present, use BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK
    Regards, IA

  • HT4623 i cant work out how to transfer my stuff from i-tunes back onto my phone? any help would be much appriciated

    i cant work out how to transfer my stuff from i-tunes back onto my phone? any help would be much appriciated

    do you mean how to restore a backup
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3053632
    or do you mean how to sync media and apps to itunes
    http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/syncing/

  • Transfer Goods Recepient from SRM to R/3

    Dear SRM Gurus,
    Is it possible to transfer the Goods Recepient from SRM to a standard table (for POs) in R/3?
    I ask this because we have implemented some customized ABAP in R/3 which sends emails to the requestor of a shopping cart when there is no delivery after 2 days the delivery days has past.
    Now we want to change this so that the email will be send to the goods recepient as he/she is the person that will enter the goods receiving in the system.
    Thanks in advance for your reply.
    Best Regards,
    Jean-Pierre

    Hi,
    Not sure why the email is being sent out from R/3. I guess you could have easily used prgrams RSWUWFMLEC and RSCONN01 to send out the email reminders from SRM itself.
    However, for your current situation, to transfer the Goods Recepient from SRM to R/3, will involve huge customization effort, as this field doesnot exist on any of the EKPO, EBAN tables
    Step 1: Create a Z Field in both EBAN and EKPO
    Step 2: In the PR or PO transfer, you can use one of the follow on doc BADI in confuntion with BAPI_PO_CREATE1 or 4.6cBAPI_requisition_create...something like that...not sure on the name of the BAPI. So depending on your version you can find out the relevant BAPI info.
    Step 3: Once this field is populated from SRM to R/3, you can customize your email notification program to send out the notification to the Goods Recepient.
    I still feel you should handle this in SRM to keep things simple !
    Pls Assign points if answer is usefull !
    Sundeep

  • Attachment missing in back end for purchase order

    Hi all,
    We are using SRM 5.0 SP10 extended classic scenario.
    I have created a shopping cart with attachment. A local purchase order has been successfully created and i can find the attachment in it.
    When i check in the backend the purchase order doesnt contain the attachment.
    I have made the required changes in BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK. I have made necessary changes in DC10,DC20 and DC30. 
    I have checked the related threads in SDN but couldnt find any help.
    Please let me know if this works only for classic scenario or the attachments can even be sent to backend in extended classic scenari as well. If yes please let me know what else needs to be done to be able to view the attachment in the backend.
    Thanks,
    Zubair.

    Hi Sanjeev,
    Thanks for your reply. I have looked into both the BAdis. I couldnt understand how bbp_driver_determine BAdi could be useful to this scenario.
    However i looked at bbp_ecs_po_out BAdi. It has IT_ATTACH as importing parameter but i couldnt make out how this BAdi could be used to transfer attachment to backend. It doesnt have a relevant exporting or changing parameter.
    Please advice.
    Thanks,
    Zubair.

  • PO attachment transfer to ECC - Extended classic scenario

    Hi all,
    We are on SRM 5.0 ECS.As standard,can the SRM PO attachments be transferred to  ECC PO?Is this possible in  ECS?If so,what are the steps?

    HI Alexander,
    The purchase order in the Extended Classic Scenario is transferred to the backend system with different Function Modules. The
    attachment transfer logic was only implemented in the Classic Scenario.
    One reason for this decision was, that the leading Purchase Order in the extended classic scenario is the local one, and in the local purchase order the attachments are available.
    At the moment it is not planned to support the attachment transfer in the Extended Classic Scenario. The transfer of attachments to backend PO is developed only for Classic Scenario.
    I am sorry that this is not the result that you wanted. This also explains why in the ECS PO transfer BADI BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI does not have the parameters for attachments where as the Classic PO transfer
    BADI does (BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW).
    We have some notes related to SC and POR reporting issues when transferring attachments to ECC side, but ther are related to Classic scenario:
    1400088: SC attachments transferred to ECC PR are lost on EHP upgrade
    1413792 Attachment deleted after changing purchase order
    I hope this information help you to understand this issue,
    Kind Regards,
    Rafael Rhoden

  • How do I transfer TV Programs from my iTunes account to my iPod Classic (so I can watch them on my TV)?

    How do I transfer TV Programs from my iTunes account to my iPod Classic (so I can watch them on my TV)?

    Ha, it worked. Thank you anyways!

  • Sharing attachment documents (e.g. for P.O.) in extended classic scenario

    Dear SAP SRM gurus
    in the SAP SRM extended classic scenarios (rel. 7.0) attachments of Purchase Order can be viewed also in the backend SAP ECC 6.0  as per SAP Notes n. 1582690 and 1057932 . But I am not sure if attachments are phiysically transmitted from SAP SRM to ECC or only document url is passed even though, as per SAP note n.1357551 it seems that only url is passed.
    My customer wants to know if there is the possibility of not replicating them.
    Any suggestions will be appreciated.
    Many thanks in advance
    Best regards
    Gianluigi Brenna
    Edited by: GIANLUIGI BRENNA on Jul 29, 2011 2:56 PM
    Edited by: GIANLUIGI BRENNA on Jul 29, 2011 3:08 PM

    Hello,
    In extended classic scenario the attachments arent transferred to ECC as the source document is in SRM. The document in ECC is only a copy and it cant be modified also.
    If we have to transfer attachments, then probably implicit enhancements to standard logic might be needed.
    Regards,
    Prasanna

  • SRM 7 : Vendor record replication in backend with Extended Classic Scenario

    Hello,
    We are implementing SRM 7 with Extended Classic Scenario and Supplier Self-registration.
    Can you explain what is to be configured to get the new vendors replicated to the backend?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    It is possible to transfer suppliers to ERP system, if you use 'Supplier registration with ERP' scenario. After registration and acceptance, newly registered suppliers would appear on supplier monitor from where you can transfer them to backend system.
    Check the below link for more details:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cf/35074152aff323e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Sanjeev

Maybe you are looking for

  • Final Cut Studio 2 Impressions with HV20 and HDV Impressions

    Ok, so I got FCS 2 up and running Monday evening. I took work off yesterday to watch all the tutorials and to play with all the new software. I got a good grip of Motion 3, FCP6 and Soundtrack. I didn't bother with DVD Studio Pro, and Color is confus

  • Error in displaying PDF file in webdynpro application

    Hi Experts, I am trying to display one pdf file using webdynpro abap using MIME. While executing the application i am getting an error in the browser: " File doesnot begin with '%PDF-' " Please help me to proceed. Regards, Arun.

  • How to use a non-Oracle database?

    Oracle Lite is used as the database per default. Technical notes describe how to use Oracle 9i. I'm more interested in using more light-weight RDBMSes like HSQLDB for example. It is been said that Oracle BPEL supports Oracle, Oracle Lite, DB2, SQL Se

  • Bookmarks folders are missing

    When I select Bookmark on the bookmarks toolbar, on the left side of the screen it shows all my bookmarks. They appear to be in alphabetical order following the folder groupings. There are no folders visible in the bookmarks section or in the pull-do

  • How to fix " insufficient disk space for encoding" on DVD STUDIO PRO 4

    I keep getting the error message, "insuffiecient disl space for encoding" on DVD STUDIO PRO 4. I  reinstallled the program, uptaded software and also cheked the library receipts file. After the reinstall I am still getting the same message. Can anyon