Attachments to SUS confirmation

Hi all,
While creating service confirmation (BUS2233), Attachment View is not
appearing on confirmation screen. So we are not able to attach any
documents to Service confirmation(similarly for ASN also, attachment screen is missing)
I have tested EBP-SUS scenario, Attachment view is appearing and I am
able to attach documents. How to activate this to MM-SUS scenario.
my requirement is Save the attached doc to Confirmation doc. No need to
transfer to Backend.
regds
Rami

Hello Ramiredy, how do you solve this issue?
Regards, José Luis

Similar Messages

SUS Confirmation Document not Created MM-SUS scenario

Hello Team,
I am facing lots of issues regarding GR document is not found in SUS system.
We are creating the GR document in MM system and transfer this document using report RPODDELVRY.
I have checked IDOC generted and transferred correctly.Subsequent XML is also there in SUS system using SXMB_MONI transaction.
But system has not created SUS confirmation document.
I have also checked the table Item table backend specific BBP_PDBEI entries are there for that material dcoument, corresponding header enteries are not found in backend specific BBP_PDBEH.We are using plan driven procument scenario.
Can you please help me in resloving this issue, why system has not generated the SUS confirmation no.What have to be done in resolving this.
Regards
Shailendra Tiwari

Hello Team,
I am facing lots of issues regarding GR document is not found in SUS system.
We are creating the GR document in MM system and transfer this document using report RPODDELVRY.
I have checked IDOC generted and transferred correctly.Subsequent XML is also there in SUS system using SXMB_MONI transaction.
But system has not created SUS confirmation document.
I have also checked the table Item table backend specific BBP_PDBEI entries are there for that material dcoument, corresponding header enteries are not found in backend specific BBP_PDBEH.We are using plan driven procument scenario.
Can you please help me in resloving this issue, why system has not generated the SUS confirmation no.What have to be done in resolving this.
Regards
Shailendra Tiwari

SUS Confirmations

Hi All
I have a issue with SUS confirmations .
The user creates Confirmations in SUS and is able to create confirmations beyond the PO value . I have checked the change and check badis . Could any one help me how to avoid creating confirmations if it exceeds the PO value .
I appreciate your help ..
Thanks

Hi
Quite easily possible Either by using any of the Business Add-Ins (BADIs)
- BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI
- BBP_ITEM_CHECK_BADI
Please read the relevant standard SAP documentation of these BADIs using SE18 Transaction .
Please refer the following links for sample code for the BADI ->
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/srm/srmBADIRepository&
Re: How to prevent users changing the GL account in shopping cart line items
Other related links ->
Confirmations not getting transferred to backend
BUS2203 for Confirmations
Re: SUS / no goods receipt doc to backend in extended classic scenario?
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

SUS - Confirmation through Catalog

Hello Folks,
Hope your day is going well...I am not lucky today.
While creating confirmation into SUS for a limit order, I tried inserting items from a catalog. Upon clicking the button "Add Item from Catalog" I encountered with an error as - Serious Error:Error in Catalog Attributes.
As far as limit PO is concerned, I believe in SUS we can insert items from the catalog at the time of confirmation. Am I missing config. settings, if any?
We are into SRM 5.0 with Extended Classic on.
May I request you to please share insight on it.
Many thanks.
Reg,

A further build-on :
I missed to mention that respective catalog ID has already been assigned to the vendor's attribute in t-code PPOMV_BBP.
Second, the same catalog can be accessed during shopping cart creation without any hassles. (SRM and SUS both resides on same server in the same client)

SRM SUS - confirmations process

Hello,
I have 2 questions, hoping you can provide help:
Question 1 - when supplier confirms the purchase order in SUS, is it possible for the supplier to go back into the purchase order and re-confirm order for different delivery dates or quantities (e.g. put back into "in process"). Currently the supplier is only able to do the ASN as the next step
Question 2 - is it possible for the supplier todo confirmations for schedule agreement releases, e.g. like we do for purchase orders? Currently supplier has "new" and "in process" status, and there is no collaboration on delivery dates and quantities back to the SAP R/3 system
We are using SRM v7 and SAP R/3 4.6c (and SAP PI)
Thanks

Hi Azam
It won't be possible for suppliers to change the PO response that they have entered initially.
Normally the PO response would go to SRM for approval by the buyer. If the buyer doesn't accept the POR they may send back and then the suppliers can enter a new one.
However if it is approved by buyer or Auto-approved( as in our case), suppliers won't be able to change that.
I imagine that it would be a complex development to change this behavior
Regards
Kedar

Error in SUS with confirmation for service (MM-SRV)

Hi everyone,
We are trying to configure the MM-SRV sceanrio in SRM 7 and ECC 6 Ehp 4.
We have a problem, when we send a Service PO from ECC to SUS, everything is fine. Then we make the Purchase Orde Responce (POR) and it is OK, but when we try to make the confirmation the system sends the error:
Action has errors
You are not authorized to call this action.
You can continue with one of the following actions
-Start Page
-List of Purchase Orders
-Display Purchase Order
We try assigning "SAP_ALL" to the user, but the error continues. Do you know what can be the issue?
Thanks,
Ivá

Hi Ivan,
This a known SAP bug. Pl implement below note.
Note 1263921 - Customizing entries required for SUS confirmation.
Once you run the program mentioned in the note, it would work.
Regards,
Sanjeev

Material PO confirmation at supplier side (SUS) not taking place in SRM SUS Extended classic scenario

We have configured extended classic scenario SRM with SUS, and all functions are working fine. However, at the time of PO confirmation of material item at the Supplier side (SUS), the material line item disappears when we click on the Create Confirmation button in SUS. The functionality is working fine for Service Items. The total value of PO is also displayed correctly in the Items overview section.
Please provide some help in solving this issue.

Hello,
This is the correct behaviour of SUS - confirmations can only be created for service items which in turn create service entry sheets (Trx: ML81N in ECC). And accepting the SES in ML81N will generate GR posting.
For material items, you have to create ASN which will in turn create inbound delivery in ECC which you can post and will generate goods movement documents.
So basically, for service items you create confirmation and for materials you create ASN.
Regards,
Prasanna

Not able to see Invoice sent by SUS to EBP in Portal

Hi,
I am trying to send Invoice from SRM SUS to SRM EBP via XML in Extended Classic Scenario(Using Service_Procurement_Supplier_Enablement XI scenario). I am able to sucessfully send and receive XML from SRM SUS to SRM EBP checked in SXMB_MONI in SUS, XI and EBP. I am using SRM SERVER 7.0.
Also i have checked in BBP_PD t-code in SRM EBP for BUS2205 Object, Invoice is showing by BBP_PD in SRM EBP which sent by SRM SUS. But i am not able to view this invoice in Portal at the tracking of PO by Purchaser Login while before this i am able to view Purchase Order Response (POR) and Sus Confirmation sent by SUS to EBP in Portal at the tracking of PO by Purchaser Login.
Kindly suggest me what should i do to get Invoice at Portal sent by SUS to EBP at Portal.
Relative answers are really appreciable and will give full points for this.
Thanks.
Regards,
Pawan Keshwani
Edited by: pawankeshwani on Aug 14, 2011 9:21 AM
Edited by: pawankeshwani on Aug 14, 2011 9:24 AM

Hi,
As per standard Confirmation can be created from SUS for a EBP/SUS colloaboration.
In my current project, where both EBP & SUS are in same server with different clients.
We have been getting confirmations from the suppliers frequently without any issue.
Only issue is after getting the confifrmation details from SUS to EBP, we made a custom workflow to
send those detaisl again back to ECC with custom FM.
I hope the above information is clear and useful to you.
Thanks
Rajesh K

MM-SUS scenario mapping of the Goodsreceipt for inbound delivery @SUS

Hi SRM gurus,
We are working on the MM-SUS scenario with SRM5.0 and ECC6.0 as the backend.
We are creating a goods receipt in the backend with respect to the inbounddelivery created from the ASN made at the SUS end.
But this goods receipt is not updated as the goods receipt in the SUS for that vendor.
Can anybody tell me how it is configured for the backend?
I could see a business object BUS2233 for the SUS confirmation transaction type as SUCF with the int.number range as 01 and the ext. number range as 02.
I am not sure where it is configured in MM. I could find one MM--> IM --> Define Number Assignment for Goods Receipt/Issue slips --> Number range grpg.code where there is an NO. rng.grpg.code and the Intern.number range as 01.
Is this the place we have the external number range as 01 which is maintained as internal in SUS BUS2233.
Any help in this regard.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Sridhar.
Edited by: P.T. Sridharbabu on Jan 31, 2008 4:57 AM

Hi All,
The report is running fine and could be able to generate the Idoc and sending it to the XI systems also. But our XI system is not able to post the same to the SUS system and is giving the following error :
The reference to a source object via the object number is different than the reference via the GUID Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_API; Include: LBBP_BD_APIF39; Line: 175
Any thoughts on this.
Shall I have to configure something in the SUS system for this report to capture there?
Or
Shall I have to configure something in the MM system ECC6.0 for this report to send it to XI correctly?
Thanks in advance.
Will be of most useful to us, if somebody throws some light on this.
Best regards,
Sridhar.

Not able to see backend material document number in SUS

Hi,
A GR is created in ECC. It is avaiable for disply in the supplier's login. We are able to achieve this.
The question is "We are not able to see backend (ECC) material document number anywhere on the screen. We are only able to see the SUS Confirmation number (i.e. as per the number range assigned to BUS2233). Is it standard behavior?
Details: SRM7.0 SP07, ECC Ehp4, Using MM-SUS. Plan driven procurement.
Ganapathi

Dear Manjunath,
Thanks for the response.
We have noticed that, the back end (ECC) material documents are getting replicated to SUS as we are able to see this number in BBP_PD & BBP_PDBEH-BE_OBJECT_ID.
So, let me put the question this way.
Our issue is with display of document in the portal (BSP Pages).
For Example, in case of Invoice, the supplier can see the back end MIRO invoice document number with the "External Reference" Label, under Basic Data section. The case is NOT same with GR. The back end (ECC) material document number is NOT seen any of the layout (for end user, who has logged in as supplier).
Is it standard behavior? If we want that, the suppliers should be able to see the material document number in the portal, when a GR is created in ECC, what settings we have to do?
Ganapathi

Copy 'Confirmation Name' from SRM Confirmation to R/3 Documents

We're using EBP 4.0 with R/3 4.7, ext. classic scenario.
When confirmations are posted in EBP we want the information entered in the 'Confirmation name' field to be copied to the material document 'Header txt' field and to the service entry sheet 'Doc. text' field (for confirmations to service orders).
We can do it for confirmations to standard orders, using an event to trigger a function module to check for the existence of the matl. doc. and update the field (with MB02).
We're stuck on confirmations to service orders, as the transaction available (ML81) does not allow the 'Doc. text' to be changed.
Any ideas please ?
Thanks,
Tim

I had same requirement and went through many posts on SDN but didnt find a solution. So after some hours of debuggin found following.
This question was asked long back but the information may be helpful for someone like me in future
So ---
·         The Function module      META_SUSCF_SEND is responsible for
1.       Mapping values from SRM (SUS) internal structures to external structures used in back end ECC(R3) system
2.       Call the driver function(BBP_SOAXML1_SUSCF_SEND) to deliver the SUS confirmation data to ECC(R3) system [ havent gone through this module but assumin it does ]
·         During the process of creating confirmation supplier will enter a custom text in confirmation field
·         In standard scenario the SRM system generated number is available in IS_HEADER-OBJECT_ID and the custom text added by supplier is present in IS_HEADER-REF_DOC_NO.
·         the OBJECT_ID field is taken to back end ECC(R3) system as ‘External Number’ in service entry sheet.
·         Hence by using an implicit enhancement option in function module ‘BBP_DOCUMENT_TO_EXT_MAPV’ transfer IS_HEADER-REF_DOC_NO to IS_HEADER-OBJECT_ID.
·         The enhancement should be restricted to confirmations only so following condition should be checked before data transfer
Ø       IS_HEADER-PROCESS_TYPE = ‘SUCF’ AND IS_HEADER-SUBTYPE = ‘CF’

PO Confirmation in SRM Classic Scenario

Hi,
I'd like to know if there's a functionality in SRM Classic Scenario wherein suppliers/vendors can tag POs that have been received by them?

Hello,
This is the correct behaviour of SUS - confirmations can only be created for service items which in turn create service entry sheets (Trx: ML81N in ECC). And accepting the SES in ML81N will generate GR posting.
For material items, you have to create ASN which will in turn create inbound delivery in ECC which you can post and will generate goods movement documents.
So basically, for service items you create confirmation and for materials you create ASN.
Regards,
Prasanna

SUS-MM integration in Classic Scenario for SRM

Hello All,
We are using SAP SRM in classic Scenario.
We also plan to integrate SUS with MM .
Looks like in the Classic Scenario with SRM , only the Direct material procurement is possible
using MM- SUS.
How would the SUS-MM integration work for Indirect PO's.
Our Process is as follows:
1) Shopping cart created in SRM for Indirect material & approved ( with cost assignment)
2) Classic PO created in backend & sent to SUS
After this step is it possible that the Vendor create the GR in SUS and it is sent to ECC for Approva through PI l??
Thanks
Kedar

KedarG wrote:
> Is it possible in Classic Scenario, to send the SUS confirmation to SRM instead and from there to ECC
NO. dont think of a situation like that. if it is classic scenario except SC every thing will in ECC. how do you think confirmation creation can be possible in SRM when PO is not present in SRM!!
> Can you provide some details on ECC workflows. I didn't find any thing on this. Does ECC even support workflows as SRM?
>
SRM is a kiddo infront of ECC, so workflows definitely are present in ECC(not BRFs but event driven wfs).
any ways, your solution would be a custom solution, implement MB_DOCUMENT_BADI, to trigger a custom WF from custom event. this can be used for notification and stuff. but it wont stop the execution, so, dig on it how to stop the GR post till the workflow is not over.
and invoice anyways has workflows which you can use

Send mail so CC recepients don't receive attachments

Hello,
I'm a graphic designer and often send attachments that weigh up to 10mb via e-mail. Many times I need to send files to a service bureau and need to CC or BCC the client. The clients often can't or don't want to receive the attachments but need confirmation that the mail (with the attachments) was sent.
Is there any way send an e-mail containing cumbersome attachments so the CC or BCC recipient does not have to download the attachments?

To my knowledge, it's not possible to do what you want to do.
All recipients of the message (To: CC: and BCC:) will all receive an identical version of the message with attachments if there are any.
The only way around this is to send two versions of the message to different recipients. One version with the attachment, and one version without.

Limit Item Process MM-SUS scenario

Hello Team,
I want to understand the limit item process in MM-SUS scenario.
What are the process steps and document created as per system.
Kindly share any refrence document related to this process.As i need to implement this process for my client.
Regards
Shailendra Tiwari

Hope that are you in MM-SUS.
Did you post invoice in MM and reflected to SUS system or Did you post invoice in SUS system and not reflected in ECC system?
Note 891594 - SRM50-SUS: Invoice without items for a limit
Note 1062825 - Errors in SUS ASN , SUS Invoice and SUS Confirmation
Note 536597 - SRM-SUS: Invoice for limit order not possible
muthu

Attachments to SUS confirmation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for