AUC and settlement rule mismatch.

Hi,
We have created many AUCs while uploading initial data at the time of go-live by posting JVs on WBSE and then performing the settlement. Now due to some currency issues we have reversed all settlements, and then Asset accounting person has resetted the asset register.
now when I am trying to create AUC from CJ20N, system creates AUC and provides the number. but this newly generated AUC number is not matching with the AUC in settlement rule. I can't delete the old settlement rule as the settlement performed on that. as well as I am not able to add new AUC in settlement rule.
Please let me know if there is any program / tcode which can remove this inconsistency. or is there any other procedure to make it streamline.
Please help.
Regards,
Nilesh.

Hi,
There is no error message in this case.
The scenario is like:
I have one WBSE and AUC is created for this WBS. for example AUC number is 1. the WBSE is released and some cost has incurred on it. during periodic settlement the cost is settled on the AUC.
Now the Client FICO team observed that the asset accounting is wrong due to currency conversion problem, so FICO team decided to reset the asset register and upload the entire master with new corrections. this will reset the AUCs as well.
so i reversed the settlement done on AUC and got the cost back on WBSE.
FICO team has resetted the asset register and all AUCs got deleted.
Now the issue is: WBSE is having AUC #1 in settlement rule which can not be deleted as settlement is carried out on this rule.
But when I create new AUC for WBS it is being created as some different number, (lets say #7) so even if now I run settlement the settlement will be done on AUC #1 insted of #7 even though #1 belongs to some other WBSE now in new scenario.
I hope I have clearly mentioned the issue.
Regards,
Nilesh

Similar Messages

Badi for IW31 to keep check on Funds Center and Settlement rule

Hi,
My requirement is that While running IW31,if the first four characters of Settlement Rule(Cost Center) and FundsCenter is not equal to Planning Plant then an error message should be raised . Can you suggest any appropriate BADI or User Exit for this?
Path for Funds Center-->Go to>Assignment--->Funds Management
Thanks
K Srinivas

Hii Srinivas,
Did you find any solution for this, i am also encountering the same problem.
Regards,
meenakshi

Sales order and settlement rule

Hi
One of my clients has a problem with a settlement rule,
apparently as soon as he saves an order the amount is immediately included in COPA.
Where can i see this?
I tried transaction COPA but it does not work.
The settlement rule has Not for Settlement defined in Actual Costs/Cost of Sales.
What does this mean apart from the obvious?
Thx
RM

Hi,
what is scenario you are using? Is it make to order ?
are you creating sales order with reference to any project?
you can find settlement rules in
IMG>SD>Basic functions>account assignment/cositng> Maintain requirements classes for costing/account assignment.
We maintain settlement profile in requirement class.
you can create settlement profiles in OKO7 t.code. In settlement profile we have option like sales order settlement allowed / optional / allowed
Regards,
Chandra

Unable to assign AUC as settlement type in settlement rule for FXA category

Dear Experts,
One of my requirement is that one WBS has several actual posting for AUC of different types and settle through CJ88. Investment profile is not in scope.
To run the above scenario, i created AUC manually via AS01 of different types. When i create settlement rule manually for that WBS i can't see the settlement type "AUC" for FXA category. I can see only the settlement type of "PER and FULL". 100% settlement should be done for all AUC posted for that WBS at the time of each period closing.
Could you help me to resolve this issue asap?
Regards
Vetri

Hi,
To get AUC in settlement rule , you need to allow settlement at wbs level which use to be controlled in settlement profile. Also you wont find AUC but u will find fixed asset- FXA.
One more thing settlement rule come automatically when you run the settlement first time as captilisation. You will get the settlement rule automatically.
Regards
Abhishek Sinha

Creation of settlement rules for WBS element

Hi,
Iam having problem when creating the settlement rules for WBS elements. The business goes like this.
We have XI interface which creates the Idocs and an inbound program(customized) to process the Idocs. When the Inbound program is run the WBS elements are created and settlement rules are created for the WBS elements. The inbound program is run automatically thru batch job.
First time when the Idocs are processed about 95% of the WBS elements have settlement rules created and for other 5% settlement rules are not created. The Idoc is in status 64. I tried reprocessing the Idoc and then the settlement rules are getting created succussfully. The problem is Iam not able to find why the Inbound program is not processing succusfully when its run first time but works when reprocessed.
I appreciate if anyone can send their views.
Best Regards
SK

Hi!
You might set the processing to check not only once the relevant IDocs, but more times...
Check out these programs, and set them into a batch job periodically...
RBDMANI2
RBDAPP01
Regards
Tamá

WBS Elements upload with settlement rule& classification

I have created project profile & WBS elements with a BAPI bapi_project_maintain.
Now i need to apply characterstic values and settlement rules to those WBS elements.
I have been searching for a FM since long time.
I tried with LSMW also,it did not work.
Only way left to me is to write a BDC programs to full fill this.
If anybody has got some solution for this let me know.
regards
KTSS

Sreenivas,
I´m afraid that none of the 3 options is available via standard tools
I´m so sorry.
Rgds
Martina

Settlement Rule change

Dear Gurus,
This is related to an order which was created on 2007.
Order has been created and settlement rule has been defined with both PER one is 95% and other is 5% both has got settled on 2007. Now there is some balance amount which needs to be settled.
When we run the settlement rule it says there is nothing to be settled, but when we check in order there is very small amount to be settled. This is not happening because we need to change the settlement from Per to Ful but we cannot do it as this order type can have only max 2 settlement rule(both defined) and we cannot do any changes also as both of them used earlier.
Kindly let me know what shall we do for this case?
senthil

Hi Senthil,
The below links may be helpful ( Venkatesan Anandan had posted them in one tread)
http://sap-img.com/plant/settlement-rule-in-maintenance-order.htm
http://sap-img.com/plant/impact-on-business-if-pm-order-not-settled.htm
Regards
Arif

No PSG in settlement rule (table COBRB)

Hi,
I have a Sales Order which had a settlement rule created to PSG and had been settled already. However, currently, the customer of that SO became invalid as well as contract type. So I tried to realign (KEND) this PSG, unfortunately, the current PSG has gone (no PSG no. in table COBRB), in settlement rule, there are some incompleted data left, such as customer, plant...
Now I would like to close this Sales Order (no balance in KVBI), however, since there is incompletion log regarding the incomplete PSG and settlement rule, it is unable to close the SO. In case I tried to end the old settlement rule and create a new one, it seems to be unable to create using the new customer with new mapping.
Please kindly advise how to solve this problem.
Thank you.
Sirirak

answered

Settlement rule set to Periodic, remaining balance cannot be settled

Hi!
We are trying to settle the remaining balance of a network to another network. Previous balances were already settled before. However, upon checking the network that is to be settled, the settlement rule that was set was periodic and the date that it was last used was last March. Now that we are trying to settle the balances due to the postings for the period of April in CJ88, the message that there is no more to settle appears. Is it because of the previous settlement rules that was maintained? I was thinking of adding another rule wherein the settlement is set to FUL already. Kindly help me please. =)
Regards,
Happy

Hi HappyRod,
I am facing the similar issue in which i have some cost to settle and settlement rule that i am using is periodic. But when i try to settle the cost using ko88, it gives a message that "There is nothing to settle ".
Could you please guide me as to what you did and how did your issue get resolves. i guess i might be encountering the same issue.
regards,
Priyank
Please open a thread for your specific query. Don't activate old threads.
-Paul (moderator)
Edited by: Paul Meehan on Jan 30, 2012 11:09 AM

Settlement rule for AUC not automatically generated

Hi Experts,
I am working on a capital project scenario where I have configured the investment profile and assigned this to the project profile. I have also configured the settlement profile and allocation structure for settlement to FXA.
On release of the WBS element the AUC is automatically created.
I have posted costs to the WBS element.
When I run settlement in test mode, using CJ88 the details show the sender as the WBS element and the reciever as the AUC, and the amount = the cost posted to the WBS element in the posting period, (as expected)
However, (now my problem)
When I run settlement in "update" mode the settlement shows 1 settlement however when I drill down to see the sender or reciever details are blank. There are alno no accouting documents and a settlement rule does not display for the WBS element. There are no error messages even though the settlement has not taken effect.
Please can anyone advise on the possible cause of this error. One further point the document type on the settlement profile is configured as "SA" GL Account Document.
Thanks in advance.
Ian

hi,
Go to Settlement rule (CJ02),where enter the WBS .here go to Extra in the menu bar of that WBS ,under Asset under construction ckeck the box of Historiy....something like that .
Regards
Ricky

Settlement of proj cost to AUC and final settmnt to f.asset for closed proj

Hi PS Experts,
If the project (Investment Projects) has been closed and AUC has been fully settled to final asset but in some cases they still received invoices for the same project.
Would it be correct if they undo closed and undo teco the project and charge the cost to related WBS elements and settle to AUC then proceed to fully settled to a new fixed asset ? SInce the previous fixed asset has been depreciated, i guess we should create totally new asset to settle this new cost.
Please advise.
Thanks and regards,
Yuzeila

yes it is fine to do that from a system perspective
choose full capitalisation in transaction CJ88
also make sure that the settlement rule to the final asset is entered on the WBS
you need to check with your FI guidelines about asset value dates etc to check about the business perpspective
As an alternative - It would be OK to create a sub asset with new asset value dates and use this sub asset in the settlement rule

Need WBS split to AUC and Expanses during settlement (not %wise)

Hi,
We have some capital projects settling to AUC but we are also charging WBS for labor costs and travel expanses and offcouse capital costs.
Managment wants PS team to Settle labor/travel to CCTR and Capital cost to AUC. How can WBS recognize cost elements carry expanses and Capital Costs and split them during settlment?
expanse range: 500000-599999 travel/labor
Capital expance range: 600000-699999 to be capitalized
I will appreciate any clue in this regard.
-Atif
PS.: I am trying capital investment key at this time, so that WBS will settle only capital range in AUC.

Hi,
Maintain different settlement rule for WBSE with different recevier such as AUC & CTR. In settlement configuration define source structure such as CTR & AUC along with cost elements for settling the cost into different receiver.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Rakesh Pradhan

AUC distribution and settlement based on quantity

we have a requirement. my client want to procure 100 air conditioners under AUC, and want to capitalize it at the time of putting it to use. So, we need to capitalize the asset based on quantity. Is there any method to distribute/settle based on quantity. As i can only find option of percentage and amount in distribution rule.
regards

hi,
did you try it with
Equivalence number for order settlement
The costs collected in the sender object are distributed to the settlement receivers, in proportion to the equivalence numbers.
Kind Regards
Tarik

Automatic settlement rules for AUC

Hi.
I want to create the automatic settlement rules for AUC settlement instead of entering the setllement rules manually.
can anyone provide me the configuration steps required for automatic settlement rules.
Regards,
Padmavathi

Hi ,
Path: Spro - controlling - Internal orders - Actual postings - Settlement - Automatic generation of settlement rules
Can anyone please provide me the details how to configure in this path and in which scenario is it useful.
Regards,
Padmavathi

Settlement rule for AUC

Dear SAP gurus,
In AIAB, I have assigned the settlement rule for AUC asset id. However I am not able to see the settlement rule assigned in As03. Is there any report

Hi,
you can see the settlement rule only in AIAB.
regards Bernhard
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Jun 15, 2010 12:52 PM

AUC and settlement rule mismatch.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for