AUC Settlement through Invest Order

Hi
Could please explain me how the Investment order works and the settlement of the Investment Order by step by step.
Please help me I am in need
Thanks & Regards
Ramki

Hi
1) Create Investment Order, with AUC master record (KO01).
2) Created budget for Investment Order (KO22).
3) Release the Investment Order in control data tab (KO02).
4) G/L Posting to Investment Order with amount 200$.(FB60)
5) AUC Settlement (KO88). (System created the settlement rule AUTO in KO02 here).
6) Created Final asset for settling from AUC (AS01).
7) Internal Order for AUC is "technically complete" so the system will perform 'full settlement' during next order settlement run.
Reg
Suresh

Similar Messages

Settlement of Investment Order - Auto creation of Sub asset for settlement

< MODERATOR: Message locked. Please post this in the [ERP Financials - Asset Accounting|SAP ERP Financials - Asset Accounting;. >
Dear experts
Request your help on Investment orders settlement.
We are doing settlement of Investment orders to sub asset numbers, where sub assets are created well in advance.
Our client want system to create sub asset numbers automatically, while doing the settlement of Investment orders itself.
Is it possible ?, If possible, please let me know, what are the settings I need to do to meet this requirement.
Thanks in advance
S. Habib Pasha.

Hiya,
Go to IMG --> Controlling --> IO --> Actual Postings --> Settlement --> Automatic Generation of Settlement Rules.
There is no SAP Standard created for settlements to sub-assets, so you'll need to create one using option 4 there "User-Defined Strategies for Automatic Generation ...".
Once this is done, get an ABAP Developer to code the settlement rule by creating a custom project in that same transaction. The rule will be similar to the SAP Standard ones created in option 1 of the same node.
Once this is done, create strategy sequences for this, and assign to Order Type(s).
If your users can maintain a basic investment profile when creating the Order Master Data, the developer can be directed to pick that data (aka fields) for the creation of the subasset number.
Hope this helps.
Cheers.

AUC settlement through KO88

Hi all,
While doing KO88 i am getting the following error
Account 5000021 in company code P001 cannot be directly posted to
Message no. F5354
Diagnosis
Account "5000021" in company code "P001" is marked as a reconciliation account for account type "A" and cannot therefore be directly posted to.
System Response
Error
Procedure
Select a different account.
*Where as 5000021 is my Asset Account
Could you please let me knew, the cause of this message and hoe to resolve this*
Thanks
SAPUSER5

Hi
Thanks For Reply,
5000021 is my Asset Account which is assigned in AUC asset class AO90
So this is the recon account,
Please let me know what exactly i have to do
If possible please let me knew the exact procedure for AUC settlement through IO
Thanks
SAPUSER5

Reverse Asset AUC settlement with Internal order

Hi Experts,
User wrongly assigned Asset Internal Order to Expense GL Code, therefore we would like to reverse all the AUC settlement pertaining to that Internal Order. When we execute KO88, reversal its appearing one of the settlement.
Please advise what are steps required to do complete reverse for all settlement with pertaining to that Internal Order and Asset.
Thanks
Srinu

Hi:
Can you please check AIST for reversal..
Regards

AuC settlement with internal order

friends,
while settling AUC with interanal order in settlement rule i have given 100%, but after executing the settlement it is splitting the amount in three gl accounts, i created this internal order with type 0600 and object class - investment.
regards,

Hi,
In the Allocation Structure you might have maintained these cost elements against the receiver.
Thanks,
Giridhar

User status for investment order to block settlement to final asset

Hi,
I try to set up a user status to avoid user to settle internal/ investment order to final asset. I cannot find a user status that will let me make the distinction between the automatic settlement to AuC and the partial or full settlement to final asset.
The process we are using is that we do automatic settlement from investment order to AuC on a weekly basis and as soon as the final asset has been entered via KOB5 (distribution of line item) we would like to setlle it.
Do you know a way to set up a user status on an internal order to allow settlement to Asset under construction but not to final asset?
Thanks
Sabine

Hi,
I do not want to send the costs directly to final asset. Costs booked against the investment order should always first go to AuC and then to final asset. What we try to avoid is to have the 2 settlements immediately one after the other. We would like to have the settlement to AuC on a weekly basis and the other one only when capitalization is required. But if the final asset is already entered in the settlement rule of the order via KOB5, then there is a risk to settle to final asset. We would like to only run the second type of settlement only when the asset is ready to be capitalized. To be able to do that we thought about using the user status. For example, if status is "release", we could settle to Auc but not to final asset and if status is "approved", we could settle to final asset.
Do you see what I mean? I need a status that allows me to perform some transactions and another one that allows me some other business transactions. The problem is that the 2 settlements I am talking about are not recognized as business transaction but as processing type.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Sabine
Edited by: Sabine Janssen on Oct 14, 2009 10:46 AM

Investment order settled more than posted on current month.

Dear All,
I have found a stange thing that I can't explain it.
Every month end, we will settle the investment orders to AuC accounts by KO8G. At the end of Jan, I settled all of them, but I found one investment order has settled more amount than posted on Jan.
By line item display, for example, I can see the account for Inv order has 4 postings, totally $67000.00. But after KO8G, there is $90000.00 settled to the AuC account.
No error message in test run and actual post in KO8G. Settlement rule is 100% to AuC.
I am really confused about the amount settled.
Please kindly throw some light on this. Thank you.
Emma

Hi,
The settlement was done monthly. There would be no un-settled amount. But that's a good tracker for the similar problem.
For my problem, I checked the Line Item one by one in KOB5. And I found 2 docs have the wrong expense account posted by the Inv order. So that's why the amount 23000 is calculated in settlement but not no shown in the right expense account by GL line item display.
I have done a posting to transfer the amount to right expense account.
Thank you.
Emma

Investment order settlement- assignment field with order number in GL code

We are settling the investment order to the concerned asset and in reco account of the concerned asset it has to update assignment field with Investment order number from which order settlement was happend.
For example I am booking all the expences to 1000 GL account code for investment order and I am settling to 2000 GL code.
Investment order number is coming in 1000 GL code in fbl3n and for 2000 asset class (Reco 2000 GL code) it it not showing IO number.
We want IO number in 2000 GL code line item.
Do the the need full. It is very urgent..........
Edited by: sudhakara reddy jakku on May 31, 2008 8:09 AM

hi
when u are seeing gl line item .onse u enterd inthat screen change layout screen tab will be ther u plz see the IO filed and select that . to next saide it will give urs IO no.also

Capitalization of an investment order/project - Original cost elements

Hi all,
I do have a question concerning the capitalization of an investment order/investment project onto an asset under construction (AuC).
I have configured the system in a way, using capitalization key and capitalization versions, that I can capitalize 100 % of the costs within the IFRS depreciation area to the AuC and 0 % of the costs within my local gaap depreciation area to the AuC.
Instead of capitalizing the costs within the local gaap depreciation area, the cost are booked to the u201CAccount for capitalization differences/nonoperating expensesu201D.
With the settlement of the investment order/investment project to the AuC the original cost accounts/cost elements (shared between IFRS and local gaap) are credited and the AuC is debited for the IFRS deprecation area and the u201CAccount for capitalization differences/nonoperating expensesu201D is debited for the local gaap depreciation area.
My problem is, that I do not want to have the costs for my local gaap P&L on the u201CAccount for capitalization differences/nonoperating expensesu201D, I do want to have them instead on the corresponding local gaap cost accounts/cost elements to the original shared cost accounts/cost elements within FI and CO.
Is there any possibility to do this within SAP Standard?
(If possible the solution should also work within New GL, using multiple ledgers for parallel accounting instead of different account)
Thank you!
Regards

Hi Prad,
I am on 4.6C/D.
Please check on your settings for Capitalization of AUCs created through Investment Support Measures: -
1. Go to the IMG, Asset Accounting under Special Valuation and determine the Depreciation Areas you would like your Investment Support Measures to post to.
2. Still in Special Valuation, define an Investment Support Key and assign it to the relevant depreciation area
3. Also, define the relevant account determination for such posting under the Special Valuation
4. Proceed in the same area to define the Transaction type for the Investment Support Measure by changing any of the Standard ones in there in line with your requirements
5. Now move back to IMG, Asset Accounting then Master Data. Here you go to the screen layout and pick the relevant asset class for AUCs. Get this logical feild group and pick on the item Investment Support. Proceed to define its feild group rule as optional at the required asset maintenance level (Main Asset and/or Sub Level)
6. Leave the IMG and access the relevant AUC's Master Data from the User Menu. Click the tab Investment Support and insert the Investment Support Key you created in note 2 above
7. Now capitalise the AUC. Should work

KO88-AuC Settlement

Hi
We are in ECC 6.0 and activated document splitting functionality. When we are settling Investment Order through KO88 I am getting the error as "Balancing field "Profit center" not filled in line item 0001.
Pls help us to resolve the issue.
Regards
Brahmam

Hi Brahman
I think when you are settling the investment order to the AUC, one of the gl accounts i am not sure which is not getting filled up with the profit center.
The error is becuase you have made field profit center mandatory in the document splitting configuration. Hence if the profit center is not filled in the gl accounts, accounting document would not be generated.
The reason may be becuase you have not assigned the master data of the investment order. Assign the same and re-run the settlement.
Regards,
Suraj
PS. Assign points

AUC acquisition through IO

Hello Friends,
Could anybody explain me the procedure of AUC acquisition through Internal Order and settlement of this IO to AUC and AUC to main Asset?
Let me know the step wise details start from creation of IO to settlement to main Asset
Thanks to all
NMB

Hi
Create an IO - KO01 fill the details
Go to Extra tab select Asset Under Construction
Save
While doing the FI transaction the use the cost object Internal Order. The value are taken into IO.
To check the line items in Internal ORder use KOB1.
Settle the Internal order to AUC. Use KO88 and settle the order in processing type select Automatic remove the test run & execute.
Accounting Entry will be
AUC Dr
Contra Capitalized Cr
When AUC is completed and ready to move to Asset
Maintain settlement rule in KOB5. THe recevier shall be FXA and give the Asset No & %.
Again executive KO88 & in processing type select partial settlement or Full settlement and execute
Accounting Entry will be
Asset Dr
AUC Cr
Thanks
Colin Thomas

Line Item settlement of Internal Order through Investment Measure

Dear friends
Can we do the line item settlement of Internal order. The Internal order is created through IO as Investment Measure.
Thank You

Hi,
Yes. It is possible to have line item settlement for Investment Internal Order.
Trust this helps much!
Cheers!

Internal Order through Investment measure

Hi friends
I need help in the following issue:
I am creating Internal orders through Investment Measures.
When ever i create an internal order in the background it creates an AuC.
When I settle the IO the amount is posting to AuC.
After that I tried to Capitalize the AuC to main asset through AIBU transaction code, system throwing an error "Line item settlement is not possible for asset XXX XXXX".
Is this method of capitalizing right or any other method available to capitalize the AuC to Main Fixed Asset.
Please Advice me.

Capitalisation wouldn't be possible using AIBU in this case as your IO is an investement measure.
Options you've got to capitalise such AUC's is
1. Maintain the settlement rule on the IO with receiver as the final asset, set the status of the IO to TECO and then use T Code KO88 (Processing Type - Automatic) - Final Capitalisation
2. Maintain the settlement rule on the IO with receiver as the final asset and then use T Code KO88 (Processing Type - Partial Capitalisation) - Partial Capitalisation
Regards
Sreenivas

Settled investment orders

Dear All,
How to see the settle Investment orders. We are posted 1 G.L. Transaction through FB50 which the account is linked with Investment order. When ever we settle the order through KO88. The order has been settled but the values are not changing in S_ALR_87013019. But transaction values are impacted in the (FS10N) GL account.
Why it is happening can any body help in this regards.
Thanx in advance.
Regards,
Bhaskar

You are referring to S_ALR_87013019. This is Budget/Actual/Commitment.
when you settle this report will not have any impact as you are settling from one Investment order to AUC.
When you have posted the Values usign FB50 there is a change in Budget/Actual/Commitment. AT this stage there will be a change in values if you run this report.
When you settle this the same investment order is getting credited and teh amounts are transferred to AUC.
When you did the settlement, the credit also happened and hence there is no change in the values of the report.
Reward if useful.
sarma

Error while doing investment order settlement

Dear all,
My client has not settled certain line items in the
previous year for some Investment orders. Now when he
is carrying out settlement (KO88), for the current
period, he is getting error message " AW 624"(first
settle items from the previous year in the previous
year). How can he settle previous years item in the
current year since FI & CO periods are all closed for
prev. year.
The settlement rule is AUC in this case.
Thanks in adv.
Vijaya

Hi
As per note 82514:
If you simply want to settle the unsettled values from the previous year
in the current year, proceed as described in Notes 425601 and 819197. If
settlement for the previous year is no longer possible, due to concluded
fiscal years in FI and CO, or the reporting problems described above
have to be avoided due to settlement in the previous year, settlement in
the current fiscal year is then particularly necessary.
As far as I know, if note 425601 is fully implemented, AW624 should
become editable in OBA5. Could you please check if the coding has been
correctly applied? Especially below steps need to be done manually:
As a prerequisite for Transaction OBA5, you must first of all implement
the program corrections of note 425601 and insert the following
table entries :
o As of Release 4.6: Use Transaction SM31 to include application
       area 'AW' into table V_T100SA.
o Start Transaction SM31 to include the following entry in table
       T100S:
       'Application area    MsgNo    Allowed      Standard   Switch off'
        AW                  624      EWI          E           'X'
Regards
Javier Reviriego

AUC Settlement through Invest Order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for