Authorisation check for Functional Location Category

Hi All,
Does anyone know of an authorisation object which can be checked to restrict which Functional Location Categories a user can create/change (IL01, IL02)?
Thanks,
Richard

hi
i think it will serve the pupose while changing the object ,if you want to prevent for creating you can simply delete IL01 t code to the user using I_TCODE object .
regards
thyagarajan
you can also check INST_AUTHORITY_CHECK PM/CS Enhanced Authorization Checks this badi for your need
Edited by: thyagarajan krishnamurthy on May 14, 2009 7:01 PM

Similar Messages

How to find the Changes like functional location category

Hi Experts,
Can anyone guide me as to how to get the changes in Func loc category made for a func location through front end transactions or through tables when the Change document check box for Func location category has been activated and/or not activated.
Faster response will be highly appreciated and rewarded.
Regards,
Manish

Hi,
Go to that Functional Location, Extras -> Display Changes, that will display all the changes made on that FL.
Regards,
Maheswaran.

Outbound IDOCs for Functional Location

Hi experts
We are planning to use IDOCs for interfacing SAP and Legacy system using XI.
THis will be an outbound interface as we will be updating the legacy system with SAP.Therefore I am looking for a standard outbound IDOC for functional location.
So far I have not found one. Can you advise the outbound IDOC for Functional location ?
Another question I have , I have found some IDOC's but they are not released , Is there a way to release the IDOC's, what needs to be done for this.
Many Thanks
Regards
Gaurav

Hi Vinod,
This is the case for the 2 outbound Idocs from ECC to SNC for which settings have been maintained to send them immediately:
1. PORDCR1
2. STPOD
I have asked my PI team to check the PI port / PI cache. Will keep the thread updated if theres any resolution.
Regards,
Bharath

Assignment of measuring point category to functional location category

Hi,
If i am not doing performance based maintenance planning for functional locations then is there any need to assign/put measuring point category to functional location category during customization ?
Regards,
Vivek

You could also use measurement points for Condition based maintenance functionality or for Capturing measurement readings not relevant for Maintenance planning. if your business process doesn't need both along with Performance based maintenance, its not required to assign the same.
Regards
Narasimhan

Updating and deleting Partner functions for functional location

Hi ,
I am having a requirement of updating and deleting partner function for functional location .
If anyone can suggest some BAPI or function module for same .
Thanks n Regards
Manik

Hi Fritz,
Thank you for your response,
My need is to create a PARTNERS for the FUNCTIONAL LOCATION.
LET ME DESCRIBE IT.
WHEN I AM CREATING A FUNCTION LOCATION USING IL01, AS I ENTER A FUNCTIONAL LOCATION AND PRESS ENTER IN THE NEXT SCREEN.
AND
I NEED TO ENTER THE PARTNERS FROM THE DROP DROWN MENU GOTO ->PARTNERS
WHICH TAKES ME TO THE NEXT SCREEN WHERE I NEED TO FILL THE INFORMATION IN THE TWO FIELDS : FUNCT & PARTNER.
I need a partner for the functional location that i mentioned above.and i need to upload that information in through Emigall.
So my query was that can we customize that partner for this functional location and if yes, what should the constraints,
what are steps required? Do we require a custom service module?
Regards,
Robert.

Tables for Functional location/equipment in Sales Area

Hi ,This is sivakumar ...
h2.
I wanna know Tables for Functional Location/equipment in Sales area under the Customer Service erena.

I know the sales order number, header and item ..
I need other parameters to use this table....

Function module like ENQUEUE and DEQUEUE for function location.

Hi All,
I should be highly appreciate if any one help me for locking function module like ENQUEUE and DEQUEUE
for function location.
Thanks
Shaw

Hi,
You can either use the standard way of locking by using :
data:lv_varkey          TYPE rstable-varkey.
concatenate functional_location sy-mandt into lv_varkey .
*   Lock table
    CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_E_TABLEE'
      EXPORTING
        mode_rstable   = 'E'
        tabname        = 'IFLOS'
        varkey         = lv_varkey
      EXCEPTIONS
        foreign_lock   = 1
        system_failure = 2
        OTHERS         = 3.
*     Unlock table
      CALL FUNCTION 'DEQUEUE_E_TABLEE'
        EXPORTING
          mode_rstable = 'E'
          tabname      = 'IFLOS'
          varkey       = lv_varkey.
Or,
As mentioned above create a lock object via transaction SE11.
Go to transaction se11:
--> Enter lock object name e.g EZ_IFLOS
--> Click on create
--> Enter description
--> Click on tables tab
--> Enter 'IFLOS' as table name
--> select lock mode
--. click on save and activate.
2 function modules will be created as DEQUEUE_EZ_IFLOS and ENQUEUE_EZ_IFLOS .
Regards.

Authorisation check for Object F_BL_BANK using transaction F110

Hi
Can you help me with transaction F110. The object F_BL_BANK has been linked on SU24 to transaction F110. It has also been set for Check/maintain.
There is no authorisation check for this object using F110.
How can we resolve the issue.

Hi
We are on 4.6
I linked the object but the program is not doing an authority check The F_BL_BANK object has the following linked to it
. .     . Check          F_BKPF_BUP Accounting Document: Authorization for Posting Periods
. . .     Check/maintain F_BL_BANK Authorization for House Banks and Payment Methods
. .     . Check          F_KNA1_APP Customer: Application Authorization
. .     . Check          F_KNA1_BED Customer: Account Authorization
. .     . Check          F_KNA1_BUK Customer: Authorization for Company Codes
. .     . Check          F_KNA1_GEN Customer: Central Data
. .     . Check          F_KNA1_GRP Customer: Account Group Authorization
. .     . Check          F_LFA1_APP Vendor: Application Authorization
. .     . Check          F_LFA1_BEK Vendor: Account Authorization
. .     . Check          F_LFA1_BUK Vendor: Authorization for Company Codes
. .     . Check          F_LFA1_GEN Vendor: Central Data
. .     . Check          F_LFA1_GRP Vendor: Account Group Authorization
. .     . Check          F_PAYR_BUK Check Management: Action Authorization for Company Codes
. . .     Check/maintain F_REGU_BUK Automatic Payment: Activity Authorization for Company Code
. . .     Check/maintain F_REGU_KOA Automatic Payment: Activity Authorization for Account Type
. .     . Check          PLOG       Personnel Planning
. .     . Check          P_ABAP     HR: Reporting
Ther are more objects but these are the key ones The object also has a custom object in that was build by SAP called ZLSCH      Payment method We want the system to do a check on the payment method

LSMW for functional location address fields

HI Folks,
I'm loading functional location thru LSMW Direct input method. I coudn't able to see any structure relation for address fileds on functional location. I have mapped the IBIPFLOC for functional location but it doesn't have any address fields. So how to load the address fields of functional location thru LSMW direct input method. Thanks in advance.

Hi Praveen,
You can create a separate LSMW for this or you create a LSMW for FLoc upload along with the address details. I don't think this is possible with the standard program you have chosen.
Regards,
Bala

Addition of sub-screen for Functional Location / Equipment / Notification

Hi All,
Can any one help me on Addition of sub-screen based on config in new tab or sub-screen for objects for Functional Location / Equipment / Notification / Notification Item / Work OrderWork Order Operation.
If you are designed the above requirement by using ABAP objects please send sample code for the same.
I am not bothering about addtional fields which you created in your program.
Thanks a lot.
-Kalluri

Thenna,
QMIH-ILOAN -> ILOA-ILOAN
ILOA-TPLNR -> IFLOT-TPLNR
PeteA
[www.pjas.com]

Authorization Check for Storage Location

Hi Experts,
I have the following requirement :-
I have Plant : P081 created under Company Code : P110.
I have got various Storage Locations under this Plant for example
KT01 - Main Stores
KT24 - Remote Store.
The KT24 store is basically a remote location store. I have activated the Authorization for the Storage Location KT24 in the SPRO Settings
Material Management --> Inventory Management and Physical Inventory --> Authorization Management --> Authorization check for storage location.
I have maintain the following authorizations for the Object M_MSEG_LGO as follows :-
1. OBJECT : M_MSEG_LGO.
>> 2. USER ID : 081Store
>> 3. PLANT : P081
>> 4. STORAGE LOCATION : Kt24
>> 5. ACTIVITY : 01-03
>> 6. MOVEMENT : 101, 102, 201, 221, 261
and authorization for T_code MIGO_GR and MIGO_GI . I want to restrict the user for transaction only for this storage location but the system is allowing the user to post GR document for KT01 stores also.
Can any one suggest a solution or settings that need to be done for the user to be restricted to prepared GR for Storage Location KT24 only.
Thanks in advance.
AJ

Hi,
You set the authorizations to users with tcode PFCG. To know the reason of deny some access run tcode SU53 after SAP denies the access to some documents / objects.
Regards,
Eduardo

Can't find Business Object for Functional Location BOM in BAPI

Hi all,
I've to make Upload Program through BAPI for Functional Location BOM,for making that Upload i can't find BUSINESS OBJECT for FUNCTIONAL LOCATION ,Equipment BOM and Fleet Object (Vehicle).Kindly tell what Business Object should i used to create that Upload Programme.I shall be very thankful to you.
Regards,
ABAPFK

Hi
you have to do all steps in LSMW
1.Maintain Object Attributes
2.Maintain Source Structures
3 Maintain Source Fields
4 Maintain Structure Relations
5 Maintain Field Mapping and Conversion Rules
7 Specify Files
8 Assign Files
9 Read Data
10 Convert Data
11 Create Batch Input Session
Please maintain source fields required.thats important.(maintain 2 level-header and item,also provide common name of column to link to 2 files
Header file:sample
RECORDNAME     EQUNR     Plant
10001031                        10001031      3000
Item file:sample
RECORDNAME     ITEM NO     MATNR     Item catg   QTY
10001031                             10      P-1001          L               1
Regards
Seenu

Problem when Indicator for Alt. labelling for functional location activated

Dear Experts,
In our test system, i had activated alternative labelling for functional lcation for an interface with Locations in ISU.
After i activated it the entire labelling for functional locations got changed to some arbitrary sustem generated number. For a sample -?0100000000000000142. Is there a ways i can retrieve the original names back. We have reactivated it to inactive again.
Please help.
Thanks,
Boby Mathew

Hi,
Once alternative labelling is active, the previous functional location number (IFLOT-TPLNR) and OBJNR become a internal number. The visible location labels are stored in table IFLOS (Field STRNO).
How easy it is to revert to status 1-Inactive depends on the existance of IFLOS records. If there are no IFLOS records it should be possible to just deactivate via OIPU transaction - Uncheck the 'alt label active' flag - Save.
Where IFLOS records exist it means functional locations have already been created while the switch was active. These functional locations must be archived. See the full instructions for this process in note [359186|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/359186]. It's a old note but is still valid for all current releases.
-Paul

BAPI for functional location

Hi expert,
I want to upload master data for functional location .
can any body suggest me name of BAPI for the same .???
Regards
Prasad

Prasad,
It would be very useful for you to have a look at TCode BAPI to see what is available
PeteA

Alternative labelling for Functional locations

Hi All,
I wanted to know if i activate Alternative labelling for Functional locations, does it affect system performance. Also is it worthwhile to activate?
Kind Regards
Emanuel

Hi,
No, it will not have any impact on system performance. Alternative labelling offers you the possibility to have multiple labelling systems so a functional location can be known by different names by different parts of your organization. If you have a need for this then it would be useful otherwise probably not.
-Paul
Please use [Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)|Enterprise Asset Management (SAP EAM); forum for PM/CS specific topics

Authorisation check for Functional Location Category

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for