Authorisation issue in SRM 7.0

Dear Experts,
We are configuring Extended Classic Scenario in SRM 7.0.
I have 2 Purchasing groups and each having one Purchaser.
Each Purchasing group is responsible for 1 Product category.
When I create and approve shoping cart I need to restrict the processing of PO to the relavent Purchaser.
I have created 2 ZROLE in SRM by coping the standard Operational purchaser role with the modified Authorisation objects BBP_PGRP & BBP_PURORG and assigned it to the corresponding user.
For the purchasers I have asssigned the standard Operational Purchaser role in Portal.
When I log in as Purchaser still I can see and modify the PO's belonging to the both Purchasing group.
Can any one give me a suggestion how to over come this issue.
Regards,
B.N.Karthikeyan.

Hi,
In the PPOMA_BBP -Change attributes . Go to the extended attributes in the give exact product category for the purchaser
so that he can shop only that product category he cannot modify other category
Regards
Ganesh

Similar Messages

An Issue in SRM

Hi,
I got an issue in SRM. How to do this?
Spend and savings reports are two of the most common reporting areas within the sourcing organization. In addition to common report characteristics like vendor name, material number, calendar year, etc., a key characteristic for sorting spend and savings data is SCO (supplier subcommodity owner). By including the SCO characteristic within the Spend/Savings cube, end users will be able to rollup spend/savings based on the vendor classification. The SCO code is assigned to a vendor in One-Source. To make this meaningful to users, the description needs to be stored in R/3 and then extracted to BW.
Kindly reply,
Thankyou,
ABC

Hi
First, let me one thing like "ET_MESSAGES" is not a database table it is an EXPORTING parameter of BADI (BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI).
This exporting parameter is referred to one TABLE TYPE (BBP_TMESSAGES_BADI) and internally it refers to the structure (BBP_SMESSAGES_BADI).
So, what you need to do is just capture all the error messages in to some internal table and loop the internal table and populate "ET_MESSAGES" internal table which is a exporting parameter.
Hope it helps you.
Thanks
Siva

JPY Currency issue in SRM 5 Limit Items

Hi
We are having an issue JPY Currency issue in SRM Limit Items (550 SP 13).
Basically the currencies like JPY, KWR where there are no decimals causes value to be multiplied by 100.
There are lot of notes and threads on JPY currency issues.
But I have not found one that helps fix SRM Limit Items.
Let me know if there is a note or thread that talks about it.
We are on SRM 550 SP 13.
Thank You
Nikhil

see MDM forum

Issue connecting SRM 7.01 to a R/3 4.5B back-end

Guys,
I need your help with the following. We are currently trying to connect a SRM 7.01 system to a R/3 4.5B back-end. We almost got everything working except for a small problem, maybe you can help. We are using the classic scenario and are creating purchase orders in the back-end based on a SRM SC.
First question did anyone successfully connected a SRM 7.01 system to a R/3 4.5B back-end?
The problem we are encountering is as follows. In customizing in SRM I have selected system type R/3_4.5B as the back-end system type in u2018define system landscapeu2019.This causes for the determination of driver FM B45A_PO_CREATE when SRM wants to create the PO in the back-end (BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER ).This action succeeds because the PO is created in the back-end.
However, the next action of BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER is to read the data again from the back-end via FM B45A_PO_GETDETAIL. This synchronous call is done in order to update the SC status in SRM and create the linkages in BUS2121. This last action fails, because at the time the get detail Bapi is executed by SRM, the EKKO table in the back-end is not yet up to date and error u2018W5 107 purchase order does not existsu2019 is issued by the BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL in te back-end. This causes the SC in SRM to get status I1112 (error in process). Even though this status is issued in SRM, the PO is available in the back-end without any errors if I check this via ME23.
What I see is if I debug the SC transfer process and wait 1 or 2 seconds between the B45A_PO_CREATE and B45A_PO_GETDETAIL. The issue is not there. In this case it appears that the EKKO table is updated on time in the back-end and the B45A_PO_GETDETAIL can be processed in SRM without problems in order to update the SC status. I get status I1113 follow-on document created in this case.
Thus my conclusion is there is a timing issue when connecting to a R/3 4.5B system. Does anyone know a solution. Our thought goes to a small enhancement in the B45A_PO_GETDETAIL FM creating a timer to wait a second before the execution and fetching of the data. I tried it and it worked. But of course I prefer a standard SAP solution. Did anyone experienced similar behavior? Or knows a standard SAP solution to this problem?
Appreciate your help.
Best regards,
Skander

Hi Surender,
The code changes in this note only apply if the system type is u201CERP_Xu2019u201D. This is not the case over here, we are trying to connect to a R/3 4.5B system.
Some additional info, we have multiple back-ends connected. All ECC back-end function correctly and for these we do not have the problem. Only for the very very old R/3 4.5B system.
Any way I tried the note but no luck. This because of the above.
Thx.

XI System Authorisation Issue

Dear XI Experts ,
I am not able to test my scenarios in the Dev box.They are failing when I check them at the adapter engine.
The error which I am getting is as follows :
File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Received HTTP response code 401 : Unauthorized.
This looks to me as it has some authorisation issue. Can you people provide some details on this .
Thanks
Amit

Hi Amit,
Please check the following urls.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d0d9a978-5f59-2a10-1cae-d4cf0c92a0f2?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/bd5950ff-0701-0010-a5bc-86d45fd52283?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Thanks
Ravi

Ksb2 transaction ( Display commitment item for CC )authorisation issue

In my project some of the user are facing problem to display for the T code KSb2 ( Commitment Item report for cost center ).
Mesage : No authorisation to display valuation view 1 for controlling Area .
User has in her authorisation profile to display valuation view 0 ie legal valuation .
In KSB1 transaction one option comes in Extras -> Actual valuation where the user can select 0 or 1 .
But in Ksb2 this option is greyed out .
So system is reading valuation view 1 & I am not able to understand from which settings ?
Need help on this .Do we mention any where in the variant relating to Valuation View ?
Thanks

Hi,
I think try to check with your Basis person. Do /nSU53 in KSB2 to see if any authorisation issue is involved.
Regards
Divraj

Authorisation issue - the report is running and

Hello friends,
Need some help .
There is one salary report , which user is not able to see the data . It is running and running for 1/2 hours
and finally the message coming that action is cancelled.
I have checked the data flow and everything seems correct .
It seems the problem with user authorisation .
How could i check the User id authorisation for this specific salary report. ?
I am not aware about the more thing in authorisation.
Thanks in advance.
Regards

I feel this is not authorisation issue. But i am not sure.
Any way.
Run that report in tcode RSSMQ with that particular user id and try to check SU53 Tcode in another window for that user id immediatly after getting error message while running the report
RSSMQ - Runs report with other user ids
SU53 - gives information on authorisation problems if any (It is authorisation Trance)
Thanks.
Edited by: BI Dev on Jan 3, 2008 5:29 PM

Authorisation issue . - Report is running and running

Hello , By mistanly i resolved the last thread .
Yes , i have excuted the report by using RSSMQ and with the user id . I found the below messge .
Full Authorisation is requiered for this selection option .
A displayed hierachy requires option .
Could you please let me know , how i can solve this issue now .?
Thanks in advance.
Any way.
Run that report in tcode RSSMQ with that particular user id and try to check SU53 Tcode in another window for that user id immediatly after getting error message while running the report
RSSMQ - Runs report with other user ids
SU53 - gives information on authorisation problems if any (It is authorisation Trance)
Thanks.
Edited by: BI Dev on Jan 3, 2008 5:29 PM

I feel this is not authorisation issue. But i am not sure.
Any way.
Run that report in tcode RSSMQ with that particular user id and try to check SU53 Tcode in another window for that user id immediatly after getting error message while running the report
RSSMQ - Runs report with other user ids
SU53 - gives information on authorisation problems if any (It is authorisation Trance)
Thanks.
Edited by: BI Dev on Jan 3, 2008 5:29 PM

Authorisation issue regarding BEX Broadcaster

Hi all
Does anyone know why I maybe getting an authorisation issue attempting to broadcast a pdf report via the Bex broadcast tool?
The recipient user has all the relevant authorisations and roles attached, and when this report is previewed in Bex Report Designer, the report runs fine showing all the data for the report, However when the report is scheduled via the Bex broadcaster, the broadcast fails. RSRD_LOG shows the following message
Java communication error: RFC destination NOT_CONFIGURED does not exist.
Message no. RSBOLAP017
And in T-code sm21, I get the following error
X MESSAGE BRAIN 299: SAPLRSEC_CHECKS
RSEC_GET_AUTH_HIER_FOR_USER:NOHIE
This indicates that there is an authorisation error with my user, however as mentioned earlier all the authorisation objects and roles seem correct as the report runs fine as I can preview in bex report designer with no authorisation problems at all.
I have also executed the report in T-code RSECADMIN this also shows no errors in the error log and the report runs fine here too.
Please can anyone advise?
Thanks
Forhad

Hi Forhad,
I'm not sure if the error is related to the communication between the Java and the BW or if it's a problem with the authorization.
Are you using a customer exit or an authorization variable in your query/bookmark?
Check if by chance your query have an hirarchy assigned to a characteristic, then, check the user's authorization and check whether you have enough authorization for the hierarchy.
I'm unsure, but maybe note 916090 can help you.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Daniel

MM02 Authorisations Issue

Hi guys,
Hoping you can assist me with an authorisations issue I am facing.
End-users are using a Z bespoke material upload program. In order to run the program they need full authorisations to all views in MM02 as the upload program uses this transaction in a BDC Call. However they currently have restrictions on certain views in MM02.
I need to find a way that allows them to run the program but prevents them from getting full access to all the views in MM02.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Philip Johannesen

Hi guys,
thanks for your feedback.
Alex - yes you are right submitting it to a background job via a batch user wouldn't be suitable. As there are restrictions against the Users ID on which materials they copy to certain plants.
The views are there to prevent them from changing data. However they can view the data in display mode.
Do you know where I could get more detail on setting up approriate change control measures as you suggested?
Many Thanks,
Philip Johannesen

Authorisation Issue SRM 7.0

Dear Experts,
We are configuring Extended Classic Scenario in SRM 7.0.
I have 2 Purchasing groups and each having one Purchaser.
Each Purchasing group is responsible for 1 Product category.
When I create and approve shoping cart I need to restrict the processing of PO to the relavent Purchaser.
I have created 2 ZROLE in SRM by coping the standard Operational purchaser role with the modified Authorisation objects BBP_PGRP & BBP_PURORG and assigned it to the corresponding user.
For the purchasers I have asssigned the standard Operational Purchaser role in Portal.
When I log in as Purchaser still I can see and modify the PO's belonging to the both Purchasing group.
Can any one give me a suggestion how to over come this issue.
Regards,
B.N.Karthikeyan.

Hello,
This might help.
Note 1334253 - Authorization Check missing in Sourcing Cockpit
Note 1335797 - Authority Check on Process Type missing in Sourcing Cockpit
Note 1242643 - Authorized Purchase Group and organisation in POWL
Thanks
Ashutosh
Edited by: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI on Jul 22, 2009 10:35 AM

Authorisation issue

Hi
I recently purchased a new PC running windows 8.
When I went to authorise my new PC in iTunes, I put in my correct apple ID and password but kept getting the same error message "We could not complete your iTunes store request. The network connection was reset.Make sure your network connection is active and try again."
Now my network connection is fine and it even allows me to sign in to the Apple store with my current ID and even download music on the new PC once I re-verified my CC details etc, I just can't access my existing music library etc,.
It just doesn't allow me to add/authorise this second PC, I only have one other PC currently authorised so its nothing to do with exceeding 5 authorisation or my network connection. I've been trying this over a period of a week so its not a one off Apple issue like on a Sunday when they are busy. Is there anyhting with windows 8 I'm missing here that I should know about?
Guys I need your help for a solution?

Hey Finny2013,
Thanks for the question. The following articles may help you to resolve this issue:
iTunes: Missing folder or incorrect permissions may prevent authorization
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1277
Additionally, you may want to check for third-party security software or firewalls that are interfering with your connection to the iTunes Store:
iTunes: Troubleshooting security software issues
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3125
Thanks,
Matt M.

Plant replication issue in SRM

Hi Experts,
We replicated around 70 plants from ECC to SRM.Each plant coressponds to unique company code only.
The only similarity in all the plants is the adress details.
After replication,faced the red error for about 5 plants out of the 70 stating "Location Already Exists, Partner: 00100025XX Plant: 1090 System: DE1XXXXXXX The Plant is a Duplicate in the same System Plant: 36XX".
I maintained the Search term field in the adress details of those 5 plants and then replicated them from ECC to SRM.Those 5 plants got replicated succesfully.This was in Development environment.
In quality system when i try to replicate the plants,am facing the same red error for 50 out of the 70 plants.
I have checked in table BBP_LOCMAP and i find no entries related to plants which are said to be duplicate.
Please advise.
Thanks in advance
Supriya

Hello,
Please find all of the information on plant replication and maintenance
below.
Firstly, see the note:
563180 Locations - Replication of R/3 plants
1. BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_ALL should be run once in your system.
This cannot be scheduled as a report.
2. For further replication of plants, please use
BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_SELECTED.
3. The reason for the error BBP_LOCATION004 is due to duplicate
address data for plants. The system will check all address fields and
look for duplicates, if any are found the system will issue this
message and the plant will not be replicated.
4. Once replicated plant address data etc should be maintained using
the browser transaction 'Manage Business Partners' BBPMAININT.
Please set this transaction up as a browser transaction
for the SRM admin user.
5. Plants can also be created in SRM using this transaction BBPMAININT.
The can be assigned to R/3 plants.
See note 563108:
"You can also create individual locations via the Web transaction
'Managing Business Partners' and assign them to an R/3 plant."
Hope this information clarifies your issue.
Kind Regards,
Edel.

Memory Issue in SRM Shopping Cart

Hi all,
Apparently, I have implemented BAdI BBP_PGRP_FIND to map the purchasing group from z-table, based on Organization ID and Vendor. The mapping was successfully done based on the z-table entry.
However, when one of the users tried to create a shopping cart from external catalog, he found out that purchasing group was not mapped successfully, and revert to default Responsible Purchasing Group (using FM BBP_OM_FIND_SC) in the above BAdI.
This issue really puzzle me, as I have tried to replicate user's issue, and I am manage to map purchasing group from z-table, using the same test data as per what user did. I tried to replicate the same issue by using some of my colleagues' workstation, and its having no issue on the purchasing group mapping.
When I told the user to re-test again, he still have the same issue, where he could not map the purchasing group. I suspect is it a browser setting or problem? My colleagues and I are using Internet Explorer 6.0, and mapping is working OKAY. Should I ask the user to clear all the cookies and Temporary Internet Files? Is this make sense?
Also, in BAdI method DETERMINE_RESP_PGRP, I am getting current shopping cart item details by Importing item from MEMORY ID 'SCITEM', could this be the issue of ABAP Memory getting flushed when user performs the testing?
Kindly advise.
Many thanks,
Patrick

Hi all,
Finally, I found the resolution to solve this issue. I have created Implicit Enhancement in include program LBBP_SC_APPF23, Subroutine orgdata_fill. I have cleared parameter is_global-proc_group to clear the original Purchasing Group.
Not sure whether this is the SRM mistake or there is OSS note to fix that, where, I have mapped purchasing group successfully, but the standard program still stick to original purchasing group.
Hope this can be shared to whom encounters this problem.
Regards,
Patrick

Business partner issue in SRM org structure

Hi Experts,
Theres an issue with a particular user in SRM when creating a shopping cart. He gets an error message 'No data found for contact person 'xxxxx'. Inform systm admin". We haverun PFAL in the past to correct this kind of error. Howevere many times the PFAL transaction has to be run at the org level and not at the user level.this involves a lot of risk as i have faced a issue before where all the user attributes got wiped out as the PFAl was run at root org level by mistake.Is there a way where we can avaoid using PFAl and correct these kind of errors. Please provide your thoughts.
Thanks,
Pawan

Pawan,
Can you run a consistency check for this user (BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE or BBP_ATTR_CHECK) to see what is the issue?
Nikhil

Authorisation issue in SRM 7.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for