Authorisation issue in Univariate Forecast

Dear all
I have a problem in that I recieve an error message when trying to save my forecast result in univariate forecasting for a given combination. The error message states that I am "not authorized to use the selected function" once I try to save the result.
I have checked the Authorization Data for the test user role and also compared it with a role/user, which do not meet the error.
Have you experienced anything similar?
Best regards,
Anders Thinggaard

Hi,
         In order to execute the forecast, you need to have authorization object CA_APO_PRPF u2013 Forecast profile assigned to your role.
make sure you have the authorizations as listed in [Authorization in Supply Network and Demand Planning|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/en/21/f6253b90e48743e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm]
Also when you get this error, immediately open a new window ( or in the same window) go to transaction SU53. This gives you the object missing.

Similar Messages

  • XI System Authorisation Issue

    Dear XI Experts ,
    I am not able to test my scenarios in the Dev box.They are failing when I check them at the adapter engine.
    The error which I am getting is as follows :
    File_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Received HTTP response code 401 : Unauthorized.
    This looks to me as it has some authorisation issue. Can you people provide some details on this .
    Thanks
    Amit

    Hi Amit,
    Please check the following urls.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d0d9a978-5f59-2a10-1cae-d4cf0c92a0f2?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/bd5950ff-0701-0010-a5bc-86d45fd52283?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    Thanks
    Ravi

  • Ksb2 transaction ( Display commitment item for CC )authorisation issue

    In my project some of the user are facing problem to display for the T code KSb2 ( Commitment Item report for cost center ).
    Mesage : No authorisation to display valuation view 1 for controlling Area .
    User has in her authorisation profile to display valuation view 0 ie legal valuation .
    In KSB1 transaction one option comes in Extras -> Actual valuation where the user can select 0 or 1 .
    But in Ksb2 this option is greyed out .
    So system is reading valuation view 1 & I am not able to understand from which settings ?
    Need help on this .Do we mention any where in the variant relating to Valuation View ?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I think try to check with your Basis person. Do /nSU53 in KSB2 to see if any authorisation issue is involved.
    Regards
    Divraj

  • Issue with Creating Forecast Profiles/Forecasting

    Hello Experts,
    We are facing an issue with creating forecast profiles.
    We have two FYVs defined in our system, one with 52/53 fiscal weeks (Fiscal Variant W1) and the other with 12 fiscal months (FYV M1), Our storage buckets profile (STP) uses W1,  since we have many dataviews that use W1 as the FYV in the attached Planning buckets profile(PBP). We also have dataviews that display in fiscal months (use FYV M1 in the attached PBP), data from Fiscal weeks will be aggregated and shown in Fiscal months . We need to do forecasting using FYV M1, that is forecast in Fiscal Months , but since the storage bucket profile has W1 which is used in the Planning Area config. We are unable to create any Forecast profiles with FYV M1 . Please note that we cannot use M1 in STP because when we used M1 in STP, we could not create  dataviews in fiscal weeks (using W1)
    1. Is there any way we can forecast using M1 while having assinged W1 to the Planning area/STP ?
    2. OR we are willing to assing M1 to PA, provided we can use W1 in some of the dataviews, unfortunately we were unable to do this, though the vice versa is possible i,e. we could have W1 in STP and M1 in some of the related PBPs/ Weekly Dataviews.
    Please let me know if any of these are possible or if there is any alternative way to do forecasting in Fisc Months.
    Thanks
    Tej

    Hi,
    You are correct, the Storage bucket profile always has to be at a detailed level. Time bucket profile can be at higher levels like monthly, quarterly etc.,
    Coming to the root of your problem, which is you are unable to forecast at a level other that what is specified in your Storage bucket profile, unfortunately the answer is no.
    You can do a forecast only at the level at which the data is stored and not at the level at which the data is viewed.
    One work around for this is to create an additional planning area with the same MPOS and this addl PA can contain only those bare minimum KF required for your forecast. After you generate your forecast, you can copy it to your Weeks based PA and then proceed from there. This copy of KF between PA is much faster as it will happen at LC level and should not cause time delays.
    NOTE - You have to exercise caution when you are using 2 periodicities i.e., weeks and months, if you are using standard SAP calendar then you are good to go. If you are creating custom Fiscal variants pls ensure the start and end of a month is same in both the weekly and monthly variants. Failing which, there will be mismatch of data between the two dataviews.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks
    Mani Suresh

  • Authorisation issue - the report is running and

    Hello friends,
    Need some help .
    There is one salary report , which user is not able to see the data . It is running and running for 1/2 hours
    and finally the message coming that action is cancelled.
    I have checked the data flow and everything seems correct .
    It seems the problem with user authorisation .
    How could i check the User id authorisation for this specific salary report. ?
    I am not aware about the more thing in authorisation.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards

    I feel this is not authorisation issue. But i am not sure.
    Any way.
    Run that report in tcode RSSMQ with that particular user id and try to check SU53 Tcode in another window for that user id immediatly after getting error message while running the report
    RSSMQ - Runs report with other user ids
    SU53 - gives information on authorisation problems if any (It is authorisation Trance)
    Thanks.
    Edited by: BI Dev on Jan 3, 2008 5:29 PM

  • Authorisation issue . - Report is running and running

    Hello , By mistanly i resolved the last thread .
    Yes , i have excuted the report by using RSSMQ and with the user id . I found the below messge .
    Full Authorisation is requiered for this selection option .
    A displayed hierachy requires option .
    Could you please let me know , how i can solve this issue now .?
    Thanks in advance.
    Any way.
    Run that report in tcode RSSMQ with that particular user id and try to check SU53 Tcode in another window for that user id immediatly after getting error message while running the report
    RSSMQ - Runs report with other user ids
    SU53 - gives information on authorisation problems if any (It is authorisation Trance)
    Thanks.
    Edited by: BI Dev on Jan 3, 2008 5:29 PM

    I feel this is not authorisation issue. But i am not sure.
    Any way.
    Run that report in tcode RSSMQ with that particular user id and try to check SU53 Tcode in another window for that user id immediatly after getting error message while running the report
    RSSMQ - Runs report with other user ids
    SU53 - gives information on authorisation problems if any (It is authorisation Trance)
    Thanks.
    Edited by: BI Dev on Jan 3, 2008 5:29 PM

  • Authorisation issue regarding BEX Broadcaster

    Hi all
    Does anyone know why I maybe getting an authorisation issue attempting to broadcast a pdf report via the Bex broadcast tool?
    The recipient user has all the relevant authorisations and roles attached, and when this report is previewed in Bex Report Designer, the report runs fine showing all the data for the report, However when the report is scheduled via the Bex broadcaster, the broadcast fails. RSRD_LOG shows the following message
    Java communication error: RFC destination NOT_CONFIGURED does not exist.
    Message no. RSBOLAP017
    And in T-code sm21, I get the following error
    X MESSAGE BRAIN 299: SAPLRSEC_CHECKS
    RSEC_GET_AUTH_HIER_FOR_USER:NOHIE
    This indicates that there is an authorisation error with my user, however as mentioned earlier all the authorisation objects and roles seem correct as the report runs fine as I can preview in bex report designer with no authorisation problems at all.
    I have also executed the report in T-code RSECADMIN this also shows no errors in the error log and the report runs fine here too.
    Please can anyone advise?
    Thanks
    Forhad

    Hi Forhad,
    I'm not sure if the error is related to the communication between the Java and the BW or if it's a problem with the authorization.
    Are you using a customer exit or an authorization variable in your query/bookmark?
    Check if by chance your query have an hirarchy assigned to a characteristic, then, check the user's authorization and check whether you have enough authorization for the hierarchy.
    I'm unsure, but maybe note 916090 can help you.
    I hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Daniel

  • MM02 Authorisations Issue

    Hi guys,
    Hoping you can assist me with an authorisations issue I am facing.
    End-users are using a Z bespoke material upload program. In order to run the program they need full authorisations to all views in MM02 as the upload program uses this transaction in a BDC Call. However they currently have restrictions on certain views in MM02.
    I need to find a way that allows them to run the program but prevents them from getting full access to all the views in MM02.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Philip Johannesen

    Hi guys,
    thanks for your feedback.
    Alex - yes you are right submitting it to a background job via a batch user wouldn't be suitable. As there are restrictions against the Users ID on which materials they copy to certain plants.
    The views are there to prevent them from changing data. However they can view the data in display mode.
    Do you know where I could get more detail on setting up approriate change control measures as you suggested?
    Many Thanks,
    Philip Johannesen

  • Authorisation issue in SRM 7.0

    Dear Experts,
    We are configuring Extended Classic Scenario in SRM 7.0.
    I have 2 Purchasing groups and each having one Purchaser.
    Each Purchasing group is responsible for 1 Product category.
    When I create and approve shoping cart I need to restrict the processing of PO to the relavent Purchaser.
    I have created 2 ZROLE in SRM by coping the standard Operational purchaser role with the modified Authorisation objects BBP_PGRP & BBP_PURORG and assigned it to the corresponding user.
    For the purchasers I have asssigned the standard Operational Purchaser role in Portal.
    When I log in as Purchaser still I can see and modify the PO's belonging to the both Purchasing group.
    Can any one give me a suggestion how to over come this issue.
    Regards,
    B.N.Karthikeyan.

    Hi,
    In the PPOMA_BBP -Change attributes . Go to the extended attributes in the give exact product category for the  purchaser
    so that he can shop only that product category he cannot modify other category
    Regards
    Ganesh

  • Authorisation issue

    Hi
    I recently purchased a new PC running windows 8.
    When I went to authorise my new PC in iTunes, I put in my correct apple ID and password but kept getting the same error message "We could not complete your iTunes store request. The network connection was reset.Make sure your network connection is active and try again."
    Now my network connection is fine and it even allows me to sign in to the Apple store with my current ID and even download music on the new PC once I re-verified my CC details etc, I just can't access my existing music library etc,.
    It just doesn't allow me to add/authorise this second PC, I only have one other PC currently authorised so its nothing to do with exceeding 5 authorisation or my network connection. I've been trying this over a period of a week so its not a one off Apple issue like on a Sunday when they are busy. Is there anyhting with windows 8 I'm missing here that I should know about?
    Guys I need your help for a solution?

    Hey Finny2013,
    Thanks for the question. The following articles may help you to resolve this issue:
    iTunes: Missing folder or incorrect permissions may prevent authorization
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1277
    Additionally, you may want to check for third-party security software or firewalls that are interfering with your connection to the iTunes Store:
    iTunes: Troubleshooting security software issues
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3125
    Thanks,
    Matt M.

  • Authorisation issues in ECC6.0

    I am getting an authorisation error for some  transaction. I never faced any such issues before the upgrade. Pls resolve
    Thanks
    Manoj

    Hi,
    You would need to perform a security upgrade after your upgrade to ECC6.0. There are differences in the transaction codes from 4.7 and ECC 6.0 Untill you perform the upgrade, you will face such issues.
    Please follow SAP handbook second edition by Jose Hernandez for procedure of upgrade.
    If you have performed the security upgrade, then please specify the when are you getting such issues.
    Regards,
    Imran

  • Authorisation Issue ASA 5510 8.0(2)

    Hi
    I have a strange issue that when authorisation commands are sent from ASA to ACS, thet are sent to ACS with a source address of 0.0.0.0 rather than IP address of device accessing the ASA or that is how ACS is viewing it.
    Authentication on device is OK.
    We are not having this issue with other devices but this is only device we have on 8.0(2), we have devices on newer and older IOS, unless I am missing something on config but all looks OK.
    Any help/thought apprecated.              

    i wish it was that simple.
    the permissions have not changed at all on the network shares. i can log in to the network locally and have no issues whatsoever accessing the very same shares I am trying to access through the webvpn.

  • Authorisation issue:Using RRI..

    Hi Experts,
    I have an issue here as described below:
    I have created one End user role to give authorisations to end users.
    when testing(by assigning this role to test user id),I can able execute queries using Bex Analyser.But when trying to go to see some other report which is connected to the base report through RRI(via menu in query --> goto <display line-item>),I am unable to see the data.
    Its ending up with the error:You do not have sufficient authorization.
    Could some one please suggest resolution for this issue.
    Quick help will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nag

    Hi
    Please chec RRI query having authorization variables or not if yes check RSECADMIN for values assigned for those objects.
    Go to RSECADMIN and switch on the Trace with log so that it will display the exact result.
    Regards
    Jagadeesh

  • Authorisation Issue SRM 7.0

    Dear Experts,
    We are configuring Extended Classic Scenario in SRM 7.0.
    I have 2 Purchasing groups and each having one Purchaser.
    Each Purchasing group is responsible for 1 Product category.
    When I create and approve shoping cart I need to restrict the processing of PO to the relavent Purchaser.
    I have created 2 ZROLE in SRM by coping the standard Operational purchaser role with the modified Authorisation objects BBP_PGRP & BBP_PURORG and assigned it to the corresponding user.
    For the purchasers I have asssigned the standard Operational Purchaser role in Portal.
    When I log in as Purchaser still I can see and modify the PO's belonging to the both Purchasing group.
    Can any one give me a suggestion how to over come this issue.
    Regards,
    B.N.Karthikeyan.

    Hello,
    This might help.
    Note 1334253 - Authorization Check missing in Sourcing Cockpit
    Note 1335797 - Authority Check on Process Type missing in Sourcing Cockpit
    Note 1242643 - Authorized Purchase Group and organisation in POWL
    Thanks
    Ashutosh
    Edited by: ASHUTOSH TRIPATHI on Jul 22, 2009 10:35 AM

  • Authorisation issue in ME23N

    Dear Gurus,
    In the production system one user is having authorization only for ME23N and till yesterday he was able to use it. But now he is getting No authorization for document type "OPA" and activity "03". Our basis people checked authorization for the particular and he is having the required authorization. I mean for object "M_BEST_BSA" for activity "03" and for "BSART" document type "OPA".
    Basis team has not made any changes and am not sure how this issue started suddenly. Any inputs to resolve this please. Immediate help is really appreciated.
    Regards,
    GM

    Quick solution for this:
    You tell the username to BASIS team who is having this authorisation and they can simply add the saem roles to that particular user.....It may happend many times that BASIS missed out some roles or groups........

Maybe you are looking for

  • Lock the centre point of an object?

    I'm using illustrator (CS6) to animate a simple marionette type figure. I'm using the Rotation tool to turn body parts around their usual connection points, moving the transform centre point each time.  I'm wondering if it's possible to "lock" the ce

  • VHS imports drop-out

    I asked about this b4 but have found no resolution. Im importing VHS tapes into iMovie through a Pinicle DV box. The problem is, I cant walk away because every few minutes the tape stops being imported and I have to restart the process from the drop

  • Outlook credential pop-up caused by credential manager persistence state

    Help! I have a bit of a challenge at this moment, we have a hybrid exchange environment which means that some users are using the on premise exchange and some pilot users have an office 365 online account. All the users must logon to a VDI environmen

  • Photoshop CS5 Install Help Please !!!!!!!!!!!

    Exit Code: 6 -------------------------------------- Summary  -------------------------------------- - 0 fatal error(s), 52  error(s), 51 warning(s) WARNING: OS requirements not met for  {667C8B6C-3EAF-4646-A8EC-D85CCC4D3D84} WARNING: Payload cannot b

  • Phones upgrade...​.simms activated before phones shipped...​..present phones not working

    Ordered 2 Samsung s3's during the Friday sale shipped to home as an upgrade to my present phones.  I'm with Tmobile and sometime Saturday both of my present phones lost service.  BB activated the simms on the new phones which caused me to loose servi