Authorization at Company Code Level for table FEBKO

Hello Experts,
I need to add authorization check on my report program that accesses and displays data from table FEBKO. However the user should only be able to access the data of table FEBKO particular only for their company code. How can I apply this? Thanks in advance for all your responses!
Best Regards,
Kurtt

Hi,
if it is in your own report, you can define your own authorization object with field for company code. Check transaction SU21 or ask your security guy. Then you will check if an user have authorization for this object.
Cheers

Similar Messages

Account Determination at Company code level for an interface

Hi All,
We need an account determination table at company code level that will be used by an interface to find the GL accounts for a particular company code.
This is required for interfacing certain GL documents onto SAP and the account determination need not be hardcoded in the program.
Kindly revert with your ideas.....
Regards,
Gangs.

Hi Gangesh,
All the account determinations will be done only at the Chart of Accounts level only. You cant show me even one account determination which will be done at the company code level. (without giving chart of accounts before assigning a GL)
So only table T030 will be the right table for you. Hope you understood,
Regards,
Sreekanth....

Infotype authorizations at Company Code level

The project I am working on has two company codes 1000 & 1100. The user requirement is that a person working in one company should be able to make changes only to employee data of employee's in his/her company and to have only read authorizations for employee data from the other company.
I've tried creating a role for Company 1000's employees where the authorization object P_ORGIN has Personnel Areas for that company code itself and all permissions (read, write etc.) and another role with read access to all Personnel Areas. However, when assigned to a user, they are still able to access data from the other company (i.e. the company whose personnel areas were not listed in the first role).
Any ideas what I am doing wrong and how I can resolve them?

Authorization level            *
Infotype                       *
Personnel Area                 1000's Personnel Areas
Employee Group                 *
Employee Subgroup              *
Subtype                        *
Organizational Key             *
Authorization level            R
Infotype                       *
Personnel Area                 1100's Personnel Areas
Employee Group                 *
Employee Subgroup              *
Subtype                        *
Organizational Key             *
This config should work.
Or can you post the values you entered in all the HR authorization objects in your role so that we can check. (P_ORGIN, PLOGI, P_PERNR etc)

Vendor if not maintained at the company code level

Hi,
System should not save the PO, if the vendor has not maintained at the company code level. How to achieve this?
Regards,
Sattuj

> System should not save the PO, if the vendor has not maintained at the company code level. How to achieve this?
Vendor Need not to be Maintained at Company Code Level For Creating Purchase Order.
During IR only System will Look whether Vendor is Maintained at Company code Level.
Try the User Exit MM06E010 Field selection for vendor address and Check any Possibility is there.
What you can do is you Can Restrict Users to Use MK01. And give Authorization to Limited Users for XK01.
Regards,
Ashok
Edited by: Ashok Kumar Telikula on Sep 18, 2008 9:05 AM

Addition of a field in vendor master table at company code level

Hi Champs,
My requirement is to add a field in LFB1 table.
I have added the field in the table using append structure, that was fine.
I need to add the same for input/output on the screen 215 of program SAPMF02K (for the screen of Payment transaction Accounting at company code level).
As far as I know there are only screen enhancements for Vendor master(no screen exits). The screen enhacements are "Prepare Modification-Free Enhancement in Vendor Master Record". But using that i need to create a subscreen, but in my requirement I need to add the field on the same screen.
Is there any solution for that???
Please let me know if my doubt is not clear.
Regards,
Nishant

Hi Krish,
I am not able to find the screen exit for my requirement.There is only screen enhancement for Vendor master.If you have any idea of the same pls let me know.
I am ok with the solution that i need to change in the standard screen using access key, but do i need to code anything in the PAI or PBO of the screen or it will be taken care automatically. Details of the program and screen is already given.
Thanks
Reagrds,
Nishant

CO-period lock for planning on company code level

Hello,
I would like to ask you for assistence.
We would like to have the possiblity to lock the CO-periods on company code levels. For actual values, it is possible to arrange this within the validation. However, for plan values the validation is not active.
I have read about possibility to enhance an user exit for paritcular planning transactions (KP06, KP26 etc.), but I can't find it anymore.
Does anybody from you have experience with this, eventually is there another option?
Thanks in advance
Peter

I have had a similiar problem and contact to remote consulting from SAP. They offered a modification (10-15 days if I remember correctly) to make CO period lock company code depending.
If I remember correctly, his name was Valentin (in Germany).
However: if newGL is active with real-time integration and also plan transfer, I think it should be possible to lock in FI.
regards
Bjoern

Client level , company code level , chart of account level

Hi experts
Pls expline me which are we define under client level , company code level and COA level
like :
1) field status variant:
2) Dunning procedure:
3) document types:
4) doc.number range:
4) posting periods variant
5) controlling area
6) account groups
7) vendor/cust master data
8) dep key
9) chart of dep area
10) like...............................
get points
Geeta

hi geeta,
ClientA Client is the highest unit within an SAP system and contains Master records and Tables. Data entered at this level are valid for all company code data and organizational structures allowing for data consistency. User access and authorizations are assigned to each client created. Users must specify which client they are working in at the point of logon to the SAP system.
A CompanyA Company is the unit to which your financial statements are created and can have one to many company codes assigned to it. A company is equivalent to your legal business organization. Consolidated financial statements are based on the companyu2019s financial statements. Companies are defined in configuration and assigned to company codes. Each company code must use the same COA( Chart of Accounts) and Fiscal Year. Also note that local currency for the company can be different.
Company CodesCompany Codes are the smallest unit within your organizational structure and is used for internal and external reporting purposes. Company Codes are not optional within SAP and are required to be defined. Financial transactions are viewed at the company code level. Company Codes can be created for any business organization whether national or international. It is recommended that once a Company Code has been defined in Configuration with all the required settings then other company codes later created should be copied from the existing company code. You can then make changes as needed. This reduces repetitive input of information that does not change from company code to company code as well as eliminate the possibility of missed data input.
Business Area Business Area is optional and is equivalent to a specific area of responsibility within your company or business segment. BA (Business Area) also allows for internal and external reporting.
Another configuration requirement for set-up in SAP are the Basic settings consisting of the following:
Chart of Accounts(COA)
Fiscal Year Variants.
Currencies
The COA(Chart of Accounts)
The COA(Chart of Accounts) lists all General Ledger accounts that are used by the organization. It is assigned in configuration to each company code and allows for daily General Ledger postings.
Fiscal Year configuration
Fiscal Year configuration is a must and can be defined to meet your companyu2019s reporting periods whether Fiscal (any period combination that is not calendar) or Calendar( Jan-Dec).
Posting Periods are defined and assigned to the Fiscal Year.
Within the periods you specify start dates and finished dates.
SAP allows for 12 posting periods along with specially defined periods that can be used for year-end financial closing.
Rohit Agrawal

Restrict PO at company code level

Hi,
We have near about 10 number of company code and lot of plants attached to each company code.
and only one purchase organisation.
Now business require that PO shold be created only for 2 company codes not for all. there are alreday roles available for PO creation .
Now how to restrcit the PO creation at company code level because at plant level it is not possible due to large number of plants.
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Hi,
Please kindly be informed that the following authorization objects are checked when an Enjoy purchase order is created (activity 01) or changed (activity 02):
- M_BEST_BSA (document type in PO)
- M_BEST_EKG (purchasing group in PO)
- M_BEST_EKO (purchasing organization in PO)
- M_BEST_WRK (plant in PO)
So this is somthing you can not solve by only using roles. You will need as suggested to make the check in the BADI.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack.

Blocking logistic invoice verification at company code level

Dear all,
May I know what is the system setup (SPRO) for this:
Blocking logistic invoice verification at company code level ?
Thanks
tuffy

Hi There
I think it can be solved in 2 ways,,
1. Number range, if you have not defined for the particular company code for this year,,
2. Authorization for the Comp Code level (Check with your basis team ,, it will be the easieast way to block it for CC level and when ever you want they can just remove the block, (insterad of doing the changes in config, if basis can control the authorization it will be the best way)
Hope it helps,,
Thanks
Senthil

Valuation Area at Company Code level

Hi,
In what ideal business case/industry one should set valuation area at company code level when SAP recommends valuation area must be set at Plant level ? in other words..what is the practical purpose of Valuation area at company Code level?

Hi
Think that valuation area link with records in table MBEW. So, if you have a company with 3 plants, and you have a single valuation for all company, in 3 plants the valuation of materials are the same, with their implications in valuation of stock and valuation of margin in sales (remember that this value can flow -really, use to flow- to condition VPRS in SD, well see SAP Note 1365939 - VPRS logic and Customizing settings in SD and SAP Note 547570 - FAQ: VPRS in pricing for more details). If you do a valuation different by plant, stock and margin calculations are different.
What are the elements that you must considerer?
1. If the materials is purchased, think if the same material have different conditions (different conditions in MM, for instance, indirect costs as shipment costs, different vendor with meaningful differences in prices or discounts). It's indiferent that it is a raw material or a material that you can sell. The raw material will work in product costing as an item in BOM. First of all, considerer the impact in stock value, second think how is delivered the materials to customer from plants and their impact in profitability analysis. If there are meaningful differences for the same material between different plants and you give the same value in all company, depending of the mix perhaps your customer is fooling himself about this issue.
2. If the material is manufactured, talk with your CO consultant and what kind of impact could have different routings, BOM and prices of raw materials between plants. Same considerations for valuation of stocks and margin.
Finally, in the page 10 of the document you can read
Valuation must be at Plant level in the following cases:
u2022If you want to use the application component Production Planning (PP) or Costing
u2022If your system is a SAP Retail system
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo
PD: I forgot, talk this with the CFO of the company, taking in account the restrictions (when it must be plant level).
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Nov 23, 2011 9:23 AM
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Nov 23, 2011 9:24 AM

Release Strategy @ Company Code Level

Hi Guys:
We have a two plants under one compant code, when we issue PO to the vendor it consists quantities that are required for both plants ( Central purchasing org).
Release strategy for PO is at header level , I.e Total PO Value can we release strategy @ company code Level?
with Characteristics as Company Code ,PO Document Type and PO Value?
Thanks
Sweth

Hi
For example if the release strategy set at c.code level all the documents created for several plants belonging to the c.code will affect the release strategy,so that is not the purpose of release strategy,
The main purpose of release strategy is certain documents created for particular plant or particular purchasing group or more than the value need to be blocked based on your business,so you cant able to set the release at c.code level because thre is no logic.
The characteristics for release strategy for external purchasing documents are
Plant                - WERKS
Pur.group        - EKGRP
Pur.org            -EKORG
Acc.assignment category-KNTTP
Document value-GNETW
Document type-BSART
The table is CEKKO
Thanks

Difference Between "Client Level & Company Code Level"

Hello
Can any explain me the difference between client level and company code level?
What is the configuration that we do on client level and company code level?

Message: Dear,
Client : Unit within SAP system, self-contained, separate master data with independent set of tables. It represent corporate group.
Company Code : Smallest organizational unit of external account for which a complete, self-contained bookkeeping system can be replicated.
e.g, company within a corporate group
Note: You will do the configuration at company code level by logging into the client for master tables etc..

How identify the data is client level,plant level or company code level

Dear sirs,
GM
How identify the data is client level,plant level or company code level?
If there is any T.code for same in SAP plz send me otherwise any procedure?
Hopeeeeeeeeee....

Hi,
Once you gain experience, you will not look at any table any field or any view...You will do it just like how you use keyboard once you pass type writing....
That is why every area of work, including master data is handed over to specialized teams...that will be their work day in and out....for some one newly entering, it will be little bit tough...once you practice, you will not be worried any more. Of course, basic data at client level, purchasing data plant level etc...some thumb rules are there...still, you will take big blow by following such thumb rules because if you verify storage condition assigned in the storage location is not storage location level!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
that is experience!! In this forum, it is good to practice rewarding...else, there may not be any more replies
Good Luck
Message was edited by:
Gopala Turaga

F.01 - extract to consolidation on company code level

Hi everyone
We're trying to do an extract to consolidation on company code level (1). When popup dialog "Filename for extraction file" appears we can choose between presentation server or application server.
When choosing presentation server and logical filename ECCS_FILE we get error GC027 (Error opening file c:\temp\EXTRACT_CS_CO.txt).
Doing so choosing application server however works (whereas path isn't the same).
We already checked and double-checked settings of logical file name and logical path in transaction FILE.
Any suggestions what to do or isn't it supposed to work via presentation server?
Thanks in advance and best regards to all
Renaud

I have not seen anything that you have mentioned to enter file path?
Is this being customised for your Company?
How did you download this before?

Company code restriction for dashboard and webi reports in BOBJ

Hi Friends,
We have a requirment where we need to restrict user on company code level in bobj.
we have some dashborads and webi reports which need to be restricted at company code level, hence i have created a role in BI and restricted the queries (bex queries) on company code level and same role and user i have imported in BOBJ.
Now i can see the role and user in BOBJ and also i can login to BILAUNCH PAD with authentication as SAP But unable to run the webi reports and dashboard hence i have added those reports to this user in bobj and now i can run the reports, but restriction is not working.
In BI I am able to restrict user but in bobj its not restricting. kindly let me know if i am missing anything?
We are having BO 4.0 SP6.
Thanks
Basis

Hi Saurabh,
In BI its wokring perfectly fine.
I can run the query for specific company code and data is being populated as the respective compay code.
I have also configure SSO between BI & BO using below link
http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/BOBJ/How+to+setup+SSO+against+SAP+BW+with+SAP+BO+BI4.0+Common+Semantic+Layer+%28UNX%29+or+BICS
but when i am trying to create a olap connection in IDT with SSO connection test is getting failed with belwo error.
com.businessobjects.mds.olap.OlapException: [Internal] SSO token or User password is empty.
I checked STS is already there in APS .
Thanks
Basis

Authorization at Company Code Level for table FEBKO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for