Authorization Based on Key Figure in an IP Layout

Hi,
I have a situvation where there are 5 editable key figures in my IP layout, out of which 4 are open for all users and the other should be editable only for a few users. Can i have that kind of authorization in the same layout, where one key figure is editable bye a few and greyed out for others while they can edit the other 4 key figures. If yes, how do I go about it,
Thanks
Rashmi.

Hi,
You can create authorizations at Key figure level. In analysis authorization RSECADMIN you have to create an authorization and assign characteristic 0TCAKYFNM. Now you can specify the name of the keyfigure as the characteristic value that you want to restict.
But once this authorization is saved this keyfigure will be authorization relevant for every InfoProvider that contains that Key Figure.
Regards,
Deepti

Similar Messages

How to calculate percentage based on key figure maximum value

Hello everybody!
I need your expertise on a query 'issue' I'm facing. Let's say I have a query getting me the Number of Open Items per Week (starting from billing document's Issue Date).
My client wants to be able to see the percentage per week and not the actual number.
So, what I have is below:
Wk"OI Nr"
1 "68.801"
2 "66.288"
3 "59.344"
4 "50.506"
5 "20.950"
And what I want is below (in italics):
Wk"OI %"
1 "100% " (i.e. 68.801 / 68.801 * 100)
2 " 96,34% " (i.e. 66.288 / 68.801 * 100)
3 " 86,25% " (i.e. 59.344 / 68.801 * 100)
4 ......
5 ......
Is it possible to achieve sth like this by altering some key figure properties or in any other way?
Thanks in advance.

First u need to create a calculated Key Fig globally. You can do this at the extreme left end of the query Designer. Just right click on the Calculated key Fig and say New Calculated Key Figure
Give the description of the Key Fig and in the formula section just put the the key fig . 'OI Nr' in you case
When u say ok it will open the properties of the key fig there u can see Enhance>> at the bottom. Click on that make the exception aggregation to maximum and refernce characteristic for the one which u are having the values 68.801, 66.288, 59.344, ..
Save this calculated key fig
now in the Columns create a new selection under the key fig.
drag the newly created calculated key fig in this new selection and say ok.
Now right click on this new selection, go to the Calculated Single Value as drop down and make it Normalize-Sub Totals
Tick the checkbox Also Apply to result
and select Calculate Along Columns.
Save the query and execute. This should solve youe issue
Hope this helps.

Reports with only key figures? How to layout?

Hi anyone,
Could you kindly advise? I have a financial report which is about 20 key figures ex. Sales, Cash discounts, Revenue from operations, Gross Margin, Operating profit and Overheads % of sales...
For each of these areas I need to have 9 seperate numerical values:
Actual value (by month)
Last Year value (by month):
Budget value (by month)
Actual value ( year to date)
% of sales (ytd)
Last year value (ytd)
Budget value (ytd)
Full yr value (full yr)
Budget value (full yr)
This can lead to 20keyfiguresX9timeperiods = 180 numbers in the report. As I don't have any characteristics, it seems I'll end up with a very very long row.. Has anyone experience fixing this sort of issue?

Hi
Sorry for the earlier post for not explaining...
There are two ways you can do.
First way is meddling with the modelling....
Create 9 infoobject charecterisitcs with CHAR TYPE NUM and feed them with the key figures timeperiods thru update rule routine......Use this 9CHAR -> fed by kfs into Cube and you can use 2 structures...as far as the system is concerned you are using one structure of kf and one for chars.......
Second way...if ur using BEx you can think of Macros
Regards
N Ganesh

Change Order of key figures

Hi Gurus,
We are using BI 7.0. & MS excel 2003 & 2007 both.
I've designed a query with 10 Key figures.
After execution, based on Key figures I have Added Local Formula in query.
Now I want to change the order of Key Figures and bring Newly added Local Formula column at 3rd position.
I've tried using Select Filter... and changed the order of column as I want, but this doesn't work.
I can drag the column & drop it at desired position. It's working that way in office 2003.
But in office 2007, Drag and Drop not working at all. Even for characteristics also.
Is this problem with BEx Excel Patch? I've installed excel patch for both 2003 & 2007. But still not working properly.
Please suggest. If you know latest patch available for office 2003 & 2007, please suggest.
Thanks.

HI,
I am on BI7, Excel 2007
Drag and Drop Functionality for both Char & KF is working fine including the placement of Local Formula.
seems you need to check with the Basis Team for proper installation of the BEx Excel patch
Regards
ReddY A

Disaggregation of Key figure not in proportion at monthly bucket

Dear Expert,
Please find the below case.
Here Key figure 2 is disaggregated based on Key figure 1 (Calculation Type P) also we maintained Time based disaggregation K.
The issue is - if you check total, it is 13 for both key figures as shown in below screen shot.
But region wise (Detail level) if you checked, it is not in 1:1 proportion and it is causing problem for us.
For example Region 2 having value in KF1 as 2 for Week 11.2015 but after disaggregation it got nothing on KF2.
(The reason is Key figure 2 is having value in week 12 and week 13 and nothing in Week 11)
We tried 2 different approach to get 1:1 proportion in Monthly bucket, but it could solve our problem.
Approach 1-After Key figure2 calculated in Weekly bucket, Reset Key figure 2 at total level in Monthly data View and enter the Total of Key figure 2 at Total level in Monthly bucket.Check the result at detailed level.
But in this case it is calculated for week 10, 11, 12 and 13 as 0, 9, 3, 1. (We want Key figure2 as per original calculation i.e it should be 12 and 1 in week 12 and 13 respectively)
Approach2 -
Approach 2 - Add another New Key figure as Key figure 1 Total- which sum the Key figure1 at detailed unit at Month level and then disaggregation of Key figure2 based on this new KF.
Its working for this scenario but different scenario is not working.
For example- here region 3 and 4 affected.
If disaggregation at Month level is corrected, our issue will be resolve.
Waiting for your feed back.
Thank you
Sachin

Hi,
In Planning Area u2013 Key Figure settings, did you try to use u2018N - No disaggregation in timeu2019 for KF2 key figure ?
This will mean that copying will occur in technical periods of the storage bucket profile and not the way it happens now.
Other option:
Now, you storage bucket profile and also the planning bucket proifile are in Days/Weeks/ .Months
Is it necessary for your user to view data in daily buckets ? Can the user view the data in weekly buckets only (and not in daily buckets) ?
Your planning bucket profile can be in Weeks/..Months .
This way your displayed data will be in weekly buckets.
Regards
Datta

Autorisation on Key figures

Hi,
is it possible to manage autorisation based on key figures.
Or to manage a solution like : i create one query and if the user 1 has profile A he can see all key figures, user 2 with profile B can see just a part of key figures ?
if yes how can i manage it ?
because i don't want to create several queries.
Thanks
Cyril

Hi
U can do this using single query
Create a diiferent profile
eg profile A : create this profile using component S_RS_COMP object in this object you will get component
Query name , Calculated key figure , Restricated key figure etc
you can specify the activity types here
similarly create profile B with different key figure combination
assign this profile to differnt user
Thanks
Rajendra

Filter query on Key Figures

How can I filter a query based on Key Figures? When I use conditions, the results totals don't change. I need the results to reflect the filtered data.

Angie,
There is no standard functionality to achieve this, but you can do it using formulas.
To check the problem:
E.g. You have
Material Qty Value
A           1      100
B           2      300
C           4      1000
Result    7      1400
You want to be able to filter out Materials with Qty less than 2 so you are left with just Materials B and C and the result shows Qty 6, Value 1300.
Create a formula, say 'QtyH'.
The formula detail should be: Qty > 1
This formula will display 1 for Materials B and C, Zero for Material A.
Create a second formula, say 'Qty Filtered'.
Formula detail needs to be QtyH * Qty.
Change Calculations tab to Calculate Results as Total.
This formula will display Zero for Material A, 2 for B and 4 for C.
Result row will show 6.
Repeat for the Value KF.
To simplify this you can actually combine the logic in 'QtyH' and 'Qty Filtered' into one Formula. See SAP Help under Defining New Queries; Defining Formulas, Boolean Operators
Also, if instead of QtyH being Qty > 1, you use a Formula Variable, you can give users the option to specify what filter level they want.
E.g. Qty > 'MyFormulaVariable' where the formula variable is created as Manual Input/Default Value.
Hope this helps!

Is it possible to display a Bottom 10 on a key figure on values 0 only?

Hi
Is it possible using BEx Query Analyser to display a bottom 10 based on key figure values greater than 0?
I can create a condition which has the Bottom 10 on a Sales Qty key figure, but my problem is that this key figures includes some values of zero and negative values, I want to ignore these.
I have tried creating another condition, values > 0. This works on it's own but not with the Bottom 10.
I appreciate a possible solution would be to do this in data provider but we do not have access to this in our new environment.
Any responses appreciated, thanks in advance
Lloyd Bower

Arun,
Thanks for the reply, unfortunately your suggestion produces the same effect as one of my original ideas (two seperate conditions on same key figure). i.e. it only reports those in the original bottom 10 with have a Key figure qty of >0,
e.g. 3 records, as the other of the original bottom 10 have a key figure qty of 0 or a minus figure.
I'm wanting to achieve a bottom 10 of those records with a key figure above zero.
There are sufficient records in my data with a key figure above 0, for a bottom 10 to be reported.

Key Figure Aggregate in Bex Query based on Charactersitic

Hi Gurus
I am using BI7.0; but 3.5x BEx tools
I am loading 6 fields from a flat file. I am loading data for tickets. I have create an InfoObject that counts the number of tickets. No problem. Also I also have key figures that I am assigning the same value to all Charactersitics: 10,30 per ticket.
The Key figures are (Sum) with a Summation aggregation type.
In my Query, the 10,30 aggregate up based on the number of tickets (characteristic) that are available.
Question: How do I remove/stop my key figures from aggregating up (sums) the values of 10, 30 based on the charactersitic? I want only 10, 30 to be present regardless of the number of tickets (constant value applied to the key figure).
Should I change my aggregation type? If so, to what? I see a number of options, such as Last Number, No aggregation, etc or can I override this in my Query property?
Thank you

Hi Client
I would like to know how to avoid aggregation of a key figure in Bex 3.5?
Thanks
GS

SNP PR Deletion based on another key figure

Folks,
I want to delete Purchase requisition ( Distribution receipt - Planned) in APO-SNP based on the value of another key figure.
for example if the another key figure value is 1 in a particular time bucket, then i want the PR of that bucket to be deleted.
I have designed macros incorporting this logic i.e if another key figure value is 1, then make the Purchase requisition quantity as 0.
But when i execute this macro, system gives the message " Error saving Transport requisitions to live cache" and PR quantity does not become 0.
I have also tried using RLCDEL but it is not possible to selectively delete the PR using the value of another key figure.
Is there any method ( Macro or non-macro) through which i can achieve this ? Any inputs will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Pawan.

Hi Pawan,
I assumed the macro solution should work...
A macro can create orders, so logically it should be able to delete. Unfortunately I can't test it now.
Could you please do the following?
if you delete an order manually in interactive, and refresh, what happens?
does your order come back?
If yes then the issue is not directly linked to the macro...
Then could you check in SPRO - SNP global settings, do you 'Heur: Order Update' being set to 'Delta Mode'?
If yes, then set it a "complete mode"
Thanks and Regards
Julien

Key figure value based on user input.

Dear Friends,
We are using BI7.00 and NW2004S. In one of our report to monitor the number of notification closed and the number of notification open upto the user selected month. For this i have created a Query which has selection screen value as month. I have created a condition which will fetch the difference in days (notification completion - notification creation date) based on user entered value. For example if user enters 10 in the selection screen, report will fetch the notifications which have diffrence in days as 10.
The condition is okay for the above. What user actually wants is the number of notifications completed and that pending based on the value he enters in the screen. For example he enters 10 in the screen, system should show the values as shown below
                > 10 days
Completed                Pending
          3                           2
I tried various options but could not achieve this.
Experts help expected. Kindly provide solution.
Regards,
M.M

Hi,
As per my understanding 1 firstly u have to find out
the no of days (diff between dates notification completion, notification creation date .)
then u have to create condition on no of days which u
have find.there u have to create one user entry
variable for the user can enter his own parametrs.
Right?????
If It is right..
here are the steps..
1st:in the query designer at key figure coloumn create
one local formula.in that local formula create formula
variable with replacement path.in that take reference character
notification completion.in the next tab take replace ment
as key.in the last tab select "date".
2nd: do the same thing for the notification creation date.
3 rd : create 3 rd local formula and do the substraction
for the first 2 local formulas.
4th:create codition on the difference which u have find with
on that condition u can create one user entry varibale.
5th:while u defining the query put these 2 dates,i,e
notification completion, notification creation date in the character block.
If not system will ignore the formula variable which u created in
above steps.
Hope this wil help u.
regards....KP

Non cumulative key figure is not getting filled based on inflow and outflow

hi,
i have a non cumulative key figure which is having inflow and outflow.
i have these three info objects in dso.
as i know non *** key figure is calculated based on inflow and outflow.
i am getting values for inflow and outflow so non *** should be calculated based on this values.
but the collumn is blank in the dso
in that non *** keyfigure i have added two info objects in inflow and outflow.
is there any other setting i nedd to do?
please sugest me.
its urgent

Hi Venkat,
Have you followed the process right. First Filling the Initial Stocks and then Inflow and Out Flow and then Delta. If you follow the process correctly then you can able to view the Data in the Reporting Level.
For Initial Stocks the Marker Should be set. For Inflow and Outflow the Marker should not be set.
Hope This Helps,
Regards,
rik

Key figures in Cost elemnt based report

Dear All,
I have created a Cost Element based Report for the Project using report painter. In this same report, I want to pull a key figure(the key figure is 'remaining forecast planned costs") which is coming from cost forecasting report (Report 12CTC1 from transaction CJE0).
The issue is this 'key figure' is not available for report made in report group 6P3(report group for cost element based report). Is there anyway I can pull this particular key figure in my report.
Thanks in advance !
Regards,
Mahendra Dighe

Also if you're using HR data, the employee data is time dependent, so that for each employee number there are any number of records. This may be causing the aggregate reporting condition that you mentioned. In BW it's important to recognize that the master data also can play a role in how many records are returned. The infoprovider is not the only source of additional records. For example:
Employee has three records in the time range.
Salary infoprovider has only one.
Results will contain THREE records, one for each employee record, all with the same salary record. On an aggregate basis, the salary results will be multiplied by three.
Time dependent master data can be a source of much confusion. For some HR reporting, I have created a 'most current' employee master data record that is not time dependent, and is loaded daily. I then use that for data models such as salary or other separate infoproviders.

Key figures in cost element based report

Dear All,
I have created a Cost Element based Report for the Project using report painter. In this same report, I want to pull a key figure(the key figure is 'remaining forecast planned costs") which is coming from cost forecasting report (Report 12CTC1 from transaction CJE0).
The issue is this 'key figure' is not available for report made in report group 6P3(report group for cost element based report). Is there anyway I can pull this particular key figure in my report.
Thanks in advance !
Regards,
Mahendra Dighe

Also if you're using HR data, the employee data is time dependent, so that for each employee number there are any number of records. This may be causing the aggregate reporting condition that you mentioned. In BW it's important to recognize that the master data also can play a role in how many records are returned. The infoprovider is not the only source of additional records. For example:
Employee has three records in the time range.
Salary infoprovider has only one.
Results will contain THREE records, one for each employee record, all with the same salary record. On an aggregate basis, the salary results will be multiplied by three.
Time dependent master data can be a source of much confusion. For some HR reporting, I have created a 'most current' employee master data record that is not time dependent, and is loaded daily. I then use that for data models such as salary or other separate infoproviders.

Calculation based on date key figures in BEx

Hi Friends,
Hi Friends,
I need to creat report for sales order data, which involved the calculation based on dates.
In my cune iam having the data at the granual level with the dates as key figures. the calculation that i need to do is VTW = Actual PGI date - Customer want date.
1) whn i run the report at the granual level my VTW is working correctly. No issues.
2) when i run the report at higher levels the date fields are updated with X, as the system is unable to aggrigate the dates. The dates are at the material level in a sales order. I need to show the VTW at the sales order level (each one of the two dates are same for all the materials). So, when i run the report with out mataril at the sales order level...i wanto sea the bothe date fields in a single line and also the VTW calculated as the different between throse two dates.
3) Once we get the VTW correctly at the sales orde level. if i drill down the report for material, i want to sea both the dates in every record againest the matarial, but the VTW only aginest the first record...that is againest the sales order. I dont waht the VTW value repeated/duplicated for all the records againest the sales order,as VTW makes sence only at the Sales Order level.
Please suggest me hwo i can achive the resulsts by meeting both Point 2 and 3.
Thanks for ur help...in advance.
Thanks,
Renu

Hi..
I have the data from the extractore and in the cube as below.
SALES ORDER    ITEM                MATERIAL            DATE1                         DATE2
101                        Item1               Mat1              01/01/2010                15/01/2010
101                        Item2               Mat2              01/01/2010                15/01/2010
101                       Item3                Mat3             01/01/2010                15/01/2010
I need the reports as below...
Report1:
SALES ORDER        DATE1                         DATE2                  VTW (DATE2 - DATE1)
101                        01/01/2010                15/01/2010                14
currently iam getting this Report1 output as below...
SALES ORDER        DATE1                         DATE2                  VTW (DATE2 - DATE1)
101                             X                                   X                           42
Report2: Out put required as below
SALES ORDER     ITEM                MATERIAL            DATE1                         DATE2      VTW (DATE2 - DATE1)
101                        Item1               Mat1              01/01/2010                15/01/2010              14
101                        Item2               Mat2              01/01/2010                15/01/2010
101                   I     tem3                Mat3             01/01/2010                15/01/2010
currently iam getting this Report2 output as below...
SALES ORDER     ITEM                MATERIAL            DATE1                         DATE2      VTW (DATE2 - DATE1)
101                        Item1               Mat1              01/01/2010                15/01/2010              14
101                        Item2               Mat2              01/01/2010                15/01/2010               14
101                   I     tem3                Mat3             01/01/2010                15/01/2010               14
As VTW is need to be measued at the sales order level and we always have the DATE1 & DATE2 as same for all the itesm, it should be shon as only 14 in the first record. It mean once iget the required output from Report one in a single line with VTW as 14, it should not repeat with every line , when i dril down the report for Items or materials.
Even if i can generate oly report2 as required in a single sheet ...that will be enough.
Plas kindly provide some solution as how we can achieve this,
Thanks,
Renu

Authorization Based on Key Figure in an IP Layout

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for