Authorization check after upgrade

HI!
Do you know if after an upgrade from 46C to 4.7 (Was 6.20) I must execute, for example, a report standard to regenerate all the profile and the authorization? Or the transaction PFCG work fine after the upgrade without manually activities?
Thanks

After upgrade, the authorizations will change or upgrade to 7.0 Authorization concept.
Go to SU25 and generate the authorizations. sometimes, the authorizations would add in excess or it would be low after the upgade.
So please check the roles and other authorizations which are assigned to the end users with the roles matrices that you designed,.
Hope this would help you.

Similar Messages

Authorization issue after upgrade

Hi Everyone,
We just upgraded from BI 3.5 to BI 7 last week.
At the moment, there is an issue with Information Broadcaster now, all the information broadcaster settings are created by different business units general account (Eg. BW_unitA, BW_unitB, each account only has access to their own workbooks).
All IB settings are scheduled by BW analysts, some are run by process chain.
After upgrade, most of IB jobs get error message in transaction code "RSRD_LOG": No authorization to scheduling workbook for user BW_unitA.
Any suggestions welcome!
Feng

After upgrade, the authorizations will change or upgrade to 7.0 Authorization concept.
Go to SU25 and generate the authorizations. sometimes, the authorizations would add in excess or it would be low after the upgade.
So please check the roles and other authorizations which are assigned to the end users with the roles matrices that you designed,.
Hope this would help you.

Query on new Authorization Objects after Upgrade&SAP_NEW profile

Dear Experts,
We have upgraded our system from 4.5 to 7.0 version, i was checking what are the new authorization Objects introduced after upgrade comparing older system ojects. I got few objects which are new in upgraded system,
But when i check SAP_NEW profile, and in the latest profile SAP_NEW_7000 profile i can not see all those new Ojects which are new.
generally SAP_NEW should contain all new objects which come after upgrade? i can see those in SAP_ALL but not in SAP_NEW
is there any issue in system? how should I know and where should i check what are the new Objects come in upgrade,
Please advise.
Thanks#Regards,
Vijay

Hi Jurjen Heeck ,
see my previous post
I did 'nt get this.
SAP_NEW is your friend here
does the SAP_NEW profile contains all the new authorization Objects.
Regards,
Anthony

Authorization problems after upgrade

After upgrading to the new version of iTunes, I was prompted to reauthorize my pc. It will not accept my old aol screename and password (no longer with aol), and when I created a new screename with apple, it did not copy 410 songs over. So I'm stuck. I can't authorize my pc to play those songs, and I'm getting a little frustrated. Of course, aol is no help at all since they're found in the bottom ring of ****. Any suggestions?

Hi all.
I resolved my own problem.
Additional to the permission settings as they are explained in note 804996, you must add the Directory Security - Authentication & Access Control, set to Integrated Windows Authentication.
Otherwise Windows NTFS security will block you.
Gr.,
Marc.

Authorization problems after upgrading software

I seem to have some sort of mismatch between the iPod and iTunes with respect to computer authorization. And when I try to authorize this computer, a messags states that this computer is already authorized.
Background: My young son connected our iPod to his computer, where (I think) there is no authorization. Next time I tried to sync it on my own computer, iTunes displayed a message that the iPod was corrupt and I should try to restore it. When I tried that, I got a message, "The iPod ... could not be restored. An unknown error occurred (1415)."
Instructions on this website said I should try upgrading iTunes and rebooting, then try restoring again. I did so, with the result that I got the same error message except with error number 1418.
Other instructions said to make sure the iPod was fully charged. So I charged it overnight and, weirdly, now it seems to be fine. (I didn't even have to "restore" it.)
Except now every time I try to sync, I get this message: "This computer is no longer authorized to play purchased items that are on the iPod ... Would you like to authorize this computer for items purchased from the iTunes store? ..." So I click Authorize and apparently succeed.
But then I got another message, saying that a specific song (purchased yesterday) "was not copied to the iPod ... because you are not authorized to play it on this computer." DOH!
So I go back to iTunes and select Store -> Authorize Computer. But it says this computer is already authorized (which of course it was). But I still can't sync that new song with the iPod mini.
So, as I said, there seems to be some sort of mismatch between the iPod and iTunes with respect to which computer is authorized. Yet when I try to authorize this computer via the iPod message and via Store -> Authorize Computer, both say that this computer is already authorized. Infuriating.
Any suggestions? Please?

I had a similar problem with iTunes when I upgraded to the new 7.5 version. I didn't upgrade my system software or hardware, but I found the Article: 306424 helpful. My problem was with some music that I had purchased with an older Apple ID. I went to the Apple "password recovery" webpage to reset my password for the songs that wouldn't play using the old ID. It worked fine.
If it is any consolation, I am an experienced Mac technician and I am very religious about maintaining my system so that upgrades and updates to software go well. I'm not saying that you haven't maintained your system, but you may want to "repair permissions" using disk utility. I find this step very important to do before and after any software installation or upgrade. I hope this reply helps in some way and best wishes on solving your particular issue.

Authorization problems after upgrading MacBook Pro

I just purchased a new MacBook Pro (upgrading from 1st generation Intel MacBook Pro) and am unable to get working without the authorization message constantly popping up. I reauthorize (it says I am successful), but the songs (I purchased through iTunes) still will not play due to the authorization message. I have tried deauthorizing from my old system, still no joy.
I see many other messages alluding to this problem and tried burning to DVD (I don't have any CD's hanging around) and then re-importing. This does not work. Is this really a conscious decision on Apple's part, as I seem to see from some other posts, to trash all purchased content from iTunes, or is this an innocent technical bug which will (hopefully) be soon addressed? What bothers me is this seems to date back to at least July for many users.
Please advise. All my purchases (music, audiobooks, movies) have all been legitimate, through the iTunes Store and I am going to be more than upset if this has nefarious legal sources, rather than an innocent technical foulup.
If this is a simple PEBCAK (problem exists between chair and keyboard) I am happy to flout my studity for all to see. Just help me solve this problem.

I had a similar problem with iTunes when I upgraded to the new 7.5 version. I didn't upgrade my system software or hardware, but I found the Article: 306424 helpful. My problem was with some music that I had purchased with an older Apple ID. I went to the Apple "password recovery" webpage to reset my password for the songs that wouldn't play using the old ID. It worked fine.
If it is any consolation, I am an experienced Mac technician and I am very religious about maintaining my system so that upgrades and updates to software go well. I'm not saying that you haven't maintained your system, but you may want to "repair permissions" using disk utility. I find this step very important to do before and after any software installation or upgrade. I hope this reply helps in some way and best wishes on solving your particular issue.

Very slow consistency check after upgrading from 2012 RU3 to 2012 SP1 RU5

this morning we upgraded the dpm server 2012 RU3 in steps to sp1 / ru3 / hotfix and then ru5
Everything went fine but problems started with the consistency checks on the large disks. They take forever(50mb per minute).
We never saw this behaviour before. Is there anything i can do to speed up the checks?
! UPDATE ! Still expirience the same problems. Doing a consistency check on a 600Gb disk and it is running for more then 8 hours now.

No sorry. Still no real solution. It looks like Windows Server 2003 is responding slower then 2008. But a real solution not found yet.

Obiee 11g RPD consistency check error after upgrade

Hi,
got below error in RPD consistency check after upgrading from obiee 10g to obiee 11.1.1.6.
*ERRORS:
Business Model Core:
[38028] Logical column Dim - Contact.Age Range does not have a valid data type.*
logical column Age=
CASE WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" < 18 THEN 'A: <18' WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" < 25 THEN 'B: 18-25' WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" < 35 THEN 'C: 25-35' WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" < 45 THEN 'D: 35-45' WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" < 55 THEN 'E: 45-55' WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" < 65 THEN 'F: 55-65' WHEN "Core"."Dim - Contact"."Age" IS NULL THEN 'Unspecified' ELSE 'G: >65' END
above is formula for logical column "Age" and data type for that is varchar in physical
few more erros similar to above.
how can I fix the issue? appreciate for your help.
Thanks
Jay.

HI,
As I said, Age has valid datatype in physical layer but datatype is showing as "Unknown" in logical layer after upgrade to 11g. many other columns got same issue just for this logical table. I rebuild the logical column mapped to physical sources but it didn't fix the issue.
I hope you understand the issue.
Thanks
Jay.
Edited by: Jay on Jul 23, 2012 11:02 AM

Authorization Check when logon into SAP via ITS

Hello
We have implemented Authorization Check after user have logged on to SAP via ITS in this User Exit SUSR0001. It was working fine in 46C version, but after upgrade to ERP 2005, when user logs on into SAP via ITS, this user exits is ignored, while logging normally via SAP GUI; authorization check is performed as before?
Did anyone else have experienced the same problem?

From what I understand something on that line changed. We are still hanging on to our external ITS 6.20 so I am afraid I can not go into details.

"No valid source context supplied" in technical bar after upgrade to EhP1

Dears,
After upgrade from 7 to 7 EhP1 we have error displayed in technical bar (bar on the top, with Log off and Personalization buttons) in all business roles that we log in. There is BSP error displayed:
"No valid source context supplied"
Exception Class CX_XSLT_RUNTIME_ERROR
Error Name CX_XSLT_RUNTIME_ERROR
Program CL_BSP_WD_REPOSITORY==========CP
Include CL_BSP_WD_REPOSITORY==========CM003
ABAP Class CL_BSP_WD_REPOSITORY
Method CREATE_INSTANCE_FROM_XML
Line 10
Long text -
Do you have any ideas?
We have component webcuif in 701 version (SP 4).
Best Regards

thx Anup but still no success.
I am thinking whether we should do any repositories consitency check after upgrade? any manual adjustments? this is a standard component crmcmp_hdr.
the error seems to be caused by implementing note 0001358764 before upgrade in CRM 7.
Best Regards

Reporting authorization issue after BI 701 05 EHP1 upgrade

Hello,
We have recently upgraded our BI 7.0 to BI 701 EHP1 with 05 patch level. After this we had a problem with reporting authorizations for a report (query), which has created under Virtual Infoprovider.
Earlier the report use to be execute perfectly with authorizations S_RS_ICUBE object with Act 03, Subobject DATA, but after upgrade to EHP1, while executing report its throwing a error pasted below.
=============================================================================================
"Diagnosis
Errors occured while reading a VirtualProvider outside the BI system. Check whether the previous error messages contains any information about the possible cause of this error.
It is possible that the error message can not be displayed because the error message class does not exist in the BI system. If this is the case, only the name of the error class and the message number are displayed. View the error class in the source system of the VirtualProvider.
System Response
Procedure
Since the error is not necessarily in the BI system, there is no specific procedure for resolving it. With VirtualProviders, problems often occure with the connection to the system; these can lead to system termination. If the code for the VirtualProvider is not from the SAP, contact the relevant person to help resolve the issue.
If an SQL error is listed in the previous message, see the procedure for SQL errors."
===============================================================================================
After running st01 trace we identified the missing authorization is S_RS_ICUBE with Act 03, subobject DEFINATION.
Here please tell why is the subobject check is performed to execute a report (query), as this is happening after EHP1 upgrade, so let me know if anyone had any clue on this ...
Thanks

Hi Martin,
Thanks for reply.
The assumption what you made are correct, but these are the possible reasons only. Is there any specific note or any info from sap that these changes came due to the new release change, so that i can tell my manager clearly.
And I am not sure whether this is impacting the reports which using the VirtualProviders (Virtual CUBE) in place. If you could get bit more information that will be helpful...Thanks in advance.
Sridhar

Authorization objects for FM (EA-PS) after upgrade

Hi,
We are upgrading from ERP 4.6c to ECC 6.0 (IS-PS 462 to EA-PS 6.00).
On preliminary tests we have found that we need to add a few authorization objects to the users, but we want to minimize that.
We opted to deactivate BAdi implementation "FMBS_ADDON_AUTH_FI" and to mark the two checks inside IMG "Activate Old Authorization Check"
Although we have found authorization issues with objects:
F_FICA_FTR and
F_FICA_FCD
Is there a list of Objects that we need to add to the roles that I can review? or maybe an OSS Note or SDN article about this?
Best regards,
Nelson

Hi, I have been studying this, and I have found that the error message I saw yesterday definitely speaks to the problem I have been having.
I created a test role with one transaction, then went into SU24 for that transaction and made a new auth check with display 03. After I updated that role in PFCG (maintaining the new authorization), I went back to SU24, changed that new auth check by removing 03.
When I went back into the role in expert mode, the maintained authorization was gone and replaced with a new standard authorization with no values.
My concern is that wherever the authorization checks are coming from, their construction is corrupt! I'm not even sure that the original auth checks are OK -- if they had values that were later taken out, I am concerned that they will cause this error I am seeing.
I'm getting ready to upload the auth check tables from QA back to the Sandbox, but I'm not sure that will solve the problem if there is another cause for this. Is there some other setting/selection that someone must have clicked on that is now causing this problem? I still don't have a clear answer on that, and I would love to know.
Thanks,
Ed

Authorization objects for EA-PS after upgrade

Hi,
We are upgrading from ERP 4.6c to ECC 6.0 (IS-PS 462 to EA-PS 6.00).
On preliminary tests we have found that we need to add a few authorization objects to the users, but we want to minimize that.
We opted to deactivate BAdi implementation "FMBS_ADDON_AUTH_FI" and to mark the two checks inside IMG "Activate Old Authorization Check"
Although we have found authorization issues with objects:
F_FICA_FTR and
F_FICA_FCD
Is there a list of Objects that we need to add to the roles that I can review? or maybe an OSS Note or SDN article about this?
Best regards,
Nelson

Hi, I have been studying this, and I have found that the error message I saw yesterday definitely speaks to the problem I have been having.
I created a test role with one transaction, then went into SU24 for that transaction and made a new auth check with display 03. After I updated that role in PFCG (maintaining the new authorization), I went back to SU24, changed that new auth check by removing 03.
When I went back into the role in expert mode, the maintained authorization was gone and replaced with a new standard authorization with no values.
My concern is that wherever the authorization checks are coming from, their construction is corrupt! I'm not even sure that the original auth checks are OK -- if they had values that were later taken out, I am concerned that they will cause this error I am seeing.
I'm getting ready to upload the auth check tables from QA back to the Sandbox, but I'm not sure that will solve the problem if there is another cause for this. Is there some other setting/selection that someone must have clicked on that is now causing this problem? I still don't have a clear answer on that, and I would love to know.
Thanks,
Ed

Hi, I have an iphone 3GS from HK. After upgrading to 4.3.3 from 4.3.2 as prompted by itunes on May 10, 2011 my entire contact in my iphone was wiped out! When I checked my backup file in Outlook Express it was also wiped out!!! What can I do now?

Hi, I have an iphone 3GS purchased in HK. After upgrading to 4.3.3 from 4.3.2 as prompted by itunes on May 10, 2011 my entire contact in my iphone was wiped out. When I checked my backed up file in Outlook Express, it was also wiped out during the synchronization. I tried to restore from backup on iTunes but still, the contact was not there anymore. I have contacted your HK Apple Hotline and talked to a technical support called TIMMY LO, he said there is nothing to do with them and he refused to provide any support to recover my contact, he even said I should try to pay extra money to 3rd party supplier and see what they can do to my iphone, despite the fact that this could be caused by the pre-mature release of 4.3.3 when a bug still hasn't been fixed. I am very disappointed at Apple's service, especially considering that I have been a loyal customer of iphone / ipod touch in the past few years. I need an official reply from Apple on this! How can Apple be so irresponsible to their own firmware failure??

Hi, I have an iphone 3GS purchased in HK. After upgrading to 4.3.3 from 4.3.2 as prompted by itunes on May 10, 2011 my entire contact in my iphone was wiped out. When I checked my backed up file in Outlook Express, it was also wiped out during the synchronization. I tried to restore from backup on iTunes but still, the contact was not there anymore. I have contacted your HK Apple Hotline and talked to a technical support called TIMMY LO, he said there is nothing to do with them and he refused to provide any support to recover my contact, he even said I should try to pay extra money to 3rd party supplier and see what they can do to my iphone, despite the fact that this could be caused by the pre-mature release of 4.3.3 when a bug still hasn't been fixed. I am very disappointed at Apple's service, especially considering that I have been a loyal customer of iphone / ipod touch in the past few years. I need an official reply from Apple on this! How can Apple be so irresponsible to their own firmware failure??

Authorization issue after the Support packs upgrade

We're having problem on authorization issue after the SP upgrade.
One issue if "You are not authorized to call up line item display" using FCH1 and FS10N tcodes.
And the SU53 showing problem on S_TCODE FAGLL03.
How are we going to solve this issue? We dont want to add this missing auth object on all our finance roles.
Thank you in advance.

How can i send you the trace file? What is your email address?
If I were you, I won't do that. Did you not ever sign some confidentiality agreement? I wonder.
Anyhoo... (copy right @ David)
What are the objects been caught in category RC=4, RC=12?
Relate them with functional aspect of the transaction (error screen)
Edited : You can paste RC=4, RC=12 objects here without customer specific value if you want to.
Regards,
Arpan Paik
Edited by: P Arpan on Aug 23, 2011 2:36 PM

Authorization check after upgrade

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for