Authorization group in Work order

Hi all,
I was doing some reading on authorization groups and found that in ECC 6.0 the transfer of authorization group is possible from the technical object to the work order.
My question: Is there an authorization group in the work order in 46C and where can I find it? I have looked through all tabs in the work order and could not find the field.
Thanks
M

Hi Mark
Authorization Group Means
You allocate the master record of this object to a group to which only certain users have access for processing the data. The users that have access authorization have the appropriate entry in their user master record.
It has no links to Work Order, i suppose. This AG will be responsible for the technical Objects...
If you want to check for the Work Order... u will be having fields like Person Responsible, Authorization to Particular User Etc...
I dont think there is any Connection between the two..
Can u tel us ? Why u want it in the order... If your requirement is not Standard also.. there will be any other way we can Find a Solution for your query.
- Pithan

Similar Messages

Payment Card Information with Material Groups and Work Orders

When processing purchase transactions that were purchased using a payment card, standard functionality in SAP says the system automatically generates a parked document with authorized users allowed to post these documents. When these documents are being posted, does anyone know if the user can enter a material group and/or a work order number for reporting purposes?

>
Monique Stephens wrote:
> Training is not the issue. Material groups are a matter of personal preference.
>
> My main concern is if it would be a violation of SOX if the material group is changed from the original shopping cart on the PO itself.
>
>
> Monique
If your business is privately held then SOX does not apply to you. If your business has stock w/shareholders then it does.
Correcting or making the material group more accurite is something that would be MORE SOX complient and not a violation.

Authorization check creating Work Orders (IW31)

Hello everyone,
We need to make an authorization check when creating a Work Order in transaction IW31.
That check is based on the field "Main work center for maintenance tasks"
No check apart from the plant associated to the work center is done, but the problem is that there exist different Work Centers associated to the same plant, and we need to restrict it.
Our authorization model considers the Cost Center associated to the Work Center, but the Cost Center is not checked in this IW31 when entering the Work Center.
We have also tried using the classification system, but despite activating authorization obejct C_KLAH_BKL, is neither checked.
(It is amazing the difference between the number of objects marked to be checked in SU24 for this IW31 and the objects really checked when looking at authorizations trace)
We know that Work Center field exit could be used, but we would prefer not to change ABAP code.
Could you please give us a hint about how we can restrict this field?
Thank you very much.
Best regards.
Jose Sanz.

Hi Jose,
You can look at the object C_ARPL_WRK,
if you work with this , i hope you would be able to find a solution for this situation.
Thanks,
Vijay

How to stop G/L from defaulting material group in work orders

Whenever we create a work order, the material group is pulled from the material master. But, if we have a component on a work order and don't enter in a material number, the material group defaults to electric supplies. From my research, it looks like it is doing this defaulting based upon the default G/L account assigned to components of work orders. Does anyone know how to stop this defaulting?
I might be completely off and it's not related to G/L which in that case this is not the correct forum, so if someone is knowledgeable about this let me know and I can switch the forum areas.
Thanks,

hi ,
Please check the Account Assignment In Po you have created .
for expamole if Po is created with account assignment ctegourt K than account modification is VBR
as in below Path and screen shot
Now check Material group valuation class if you are short text in PO or material master valuatiobn class if you are material Number . For expamaple its is 0001 liek ypur case . Now
Check combination in OBYC in GBB transction for VBR( Assignment category is K in PO ) and valaution class ( of Material master or material group )
Many Thanks

Work orders planned cost report

Hello
In our organization, works order can have two types of settlement receivers (cost centers or internal orders). To report planned cost by receivers, we create automatically groups of works orders (by receiver) and uses standard transaction S_ALR_*.
But it works only if settlement is not modified.
Does one of you know a better way to report those costs?
Thanks

Hi,
I don't want to report planned costs by maintenance objects but by receivers.
For exmaple: i have 2 work orders on the same receiver (cost center 1)
WO1 CC1 11/2011 500u20AC
WO2 CC1 11/2011 600u20AC
I try to report planned cost for CC1
Regards
Simon
Edited by: Simon Maes on Nov 25, 2011 11:31 AM

ME21N Material group level authorization is not working in ECC 6.0

Dear Security Experts,
We have created a role Z_ME21N with one Tcode ME21N. The role has to restrict users in the material group level.
For that, we added Authorization object M_MATE_WGR.
1. When we are trying to add field values for {M_MATE_WGR, BEGRU}, generally it should show me the list possible values to be used based on the MM configuration related to Material Authorization Group. We have correctly configured the authorization groups from V_TBRG for M_MATE_WGR. But itu2019s not showing any possible values.
2. However we are able to add values manually, but I guess these are not being considered during authorization check and our restriction on Authorization group level in ME21N is not working.
Test Scenario: We have manually added values 005,007,009,010,013 (which is pointing to specific material group) to BEGRU of M_MATE_WGR. We already assigned this Authorization Object to role Z_ME21N and this role has been assigned to u2018testuseru2019, but the authorization check with the M_MATE_WGR authorization group is not happening. It allows operations on all the material groups.
Anybody came accross same scenario?
SAP Prodcut version : ECC 6.0
Database : SQL Server 2005
Support pack level : 15
Please share your views, thanks in advance.
Regards,
Abu Sandeep

Dear All,
I got a reply just now from SAP regarding the same issue.
I coudnt understand what SAP and you are saying.
Dear Abu
*Apologies for the delay. This message has been turned on to application*
*area of MM from the Basis side just now.*
*Unfortunately, authorization object "M_MATE_WGR " is not checked*
*in the purchasing transactions (PR & PO), the system works as standard*
*functional designed.*
*Only the following objects are checked in PR/PO:*
*M_BEST_BSA Document Type in PO M_BANF_BSA Document Type in PR*
*M_BEST_EKG Purchasing Group in PO M_BANF_EKG Purchasing Group in PR*
*M_BEST_EKO Purchasing Org. in PO M_BANF_EKO Purchasing Org. in PR*
*M_BEST_WRK Plant in PO M_BANF_WRK Plant in PR*
*Setting in check/maintain on in SU24 only means that the profile*
*generator will propose the object when creating a user, however is*
*does not mean that M-MATE_WGR will be checked.*
*Please close this message by pressing the confirm button at your*
*earliest convenience.*
*Many thanks in advance for your understanding.*
So, how can I resolve this problem? John, are you sure that, you implemented this successfully?
SAP says, this cant be done.
Regards,
Abu Sandeep.

How work Authorization Group in cv02n ?

Dear Gurus
i would like to know how i can use the Authorization Group in cv02n?
Is possible use this objcet in order to enable the some user to change document data ?
Thanks a lot
Daniele

You can use the Authorization Group to control the authorization at DIR level,
Person authorize for a one Authorization Group will be not able to access the DIR of other Authorization Group.

Work order Priority Authorization Object

Hi Friends,
I wanted to restrict Work Order Priority to only allow certain users (they have certain role) to set Priority,
can we do through standard security,if we can please provide me authorization object.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinika

Hi Srinika,
Goto SUIM, use option Authorization Objects by complex selction Criteria and Use "Field" to enter your required which need authorization control.
If standard object is available it will show in result else you need to find alternate custom option.
Rgds
Sunil

Work Order Reporting using I_BEGRP as a selection criteria

Hello all,
I am having a small problem regarding the authorization object I_BEGRP, which appears at general data informed tab at equipment level. The situation is as described below:
Our client has several subcontractors working with Maintenance Work Orders in the system, and in order to control that each subcontractor does only access to their own data (equipment, work orders, etc.) different authorization group has been used to assign each of the equipment.
Problem is now when the client needs to be able to know the list of MWO per subcontractor.
The need is clear: for a user that is not restricted by this authorization group, it cannot be usedas a selection criteria to obtain a list of WO of a certain subcontractor.
I have seen that it can be shown in the equipment standard report IH08, but only as exit data, but not as entry selection criteria, but neither for MWO (IW39) nor for notifications (IW29) it can be used as an entry selection criteria.
Can someone help me with this issue? is the only solution to make a custom development, and to copy program RIAUFK20 in order to allow this field as an input?
Thank you very much for your help.
BR,
Francesc.

Hi,
the only workaround I can think of is to use suitable search help for equipment. So the process would be to run IW29, open search help for equipment that allows you to specify authorization group (I think Equipment by Equipment list should work), then select all equipments from the auth. group and then run IW29 restricted by equipments. It's not nice but it allows you to select all orders that have equipments assigned to some specific authorization group. Otherwise you need to enhance standard reports to allow authorization group as one of the select options.
Cheers

Cant use more than one authorization group per report with SBO CR Basic

Cant use more than one authorization group per report with SBO CR Basic.
I have installed on SAP Business One SBO 2007 SP00 PL49 the Crystal Reports Basic 2.0.0.7.
i have defined two users, manager and supervisor.
I have defined two groups, M and S.
Manager belongs in managers (M), and supervisor is assigned to the supervisors (S).
i enter to one report, disable the public option to enable group authorization, and then check M group.
Manager can see the report, but Supervisor is not allowed. So far good.
Then i uncheck M, then check S in the report properties, and Manager cant get in, supervisor opens the report, So far good.
But when we check both Groups or more, only the M group authorization appears to work, and S group users cant acess, even the report is allowed for that group, also happens with all the groups appart the first (2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc.).
It seems that a report can manage a single group, but i have to be shure to tell this to the customer.
So far we have included all Manager users to the S group in order that only S group is used and authorized users can use, but this is duplicating user participation in groups, and it would be much easier to check the desired groups for a single report.

Cant use more than one authorization group per report with SBO CR Basic.
I have installed on SAP Business One SBO 2007 SP00 PL49 the Crystal Reports Basic 2.0.0.7.
i have defined two users, manager and supervisor.
I have defined two groups, M and S.
Manager belongs in managers (M), and supervisor is assigned to the supervisors (S).
i enter to one report, disable the public option to enable group authorization, and then check M group.
Manager can see the report, but Supervisor is not allowed. So far good.
Then i uncheck M, then check S in the report properties, and Manager cant get in, supervisor opens the report, So far good.
But when we check both Groups or more, only the M group authorization appears to work, and S group users cant acess, even the report is allowed for that group, also happens with all the groups appart the first (2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc.).
It seems that a report can manage a single group, but i have to be shure to tell this to the customer.
So far we have included all Manager users to the S group in order that only S group is used and authorized users can use, but this is duplicating user participation in groups, and it would be much easier to check the desired groups for a single report.

Restrict Vendor line items display by Vendor authorization group

Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement to restrict Vendor line item diplay for Tcode FBL1N, I have updated the Authorization object F_LFA1_BEK, its work fine if all the vendors have authorization, However it also display vendors whose auth. group is "BLANK" or "SAPCE",
Is there a way that I can slove this issue, is there any SAP notes of other object which needs to be updated ?

Hi,
this problem has been discussed on this forum last week. Basically, SAP does not perform authorization check if the authorization group is blank. Hence you need to assign authorization object to all vendors.
Cheers

WBS element in work order

I would like to restrict users to choose WBS elements in work order (in settlement rule and Addit.data - WBS element) depending on WBS type (project type - PRPS - PRART) - does anybody know how to solve it using authorization objects?

Hi,
Please use the following steps as reference:
1.Go to T-Code pfcg
2.Create a Role by giving a name say ZPSTEST
3.Click on Authorization tab
4.You will be asked to save the profile first
5.Go to Change authorization data
6.Choose SAP_ALL and adopt reference.
7.Confirm Yes to insert all authorization
8.Go and expand the link project system
9.Expand the link PS: Project Manager for Project Definition
10.Here you will see two fields Activity for Authorization che and Number of responsible per
11.Click on change button on the first field.
12.Here click on Cancel full authorization
13.Now, here you can choose what all functions you want to assign for this authorization Role.
14.Choose say Display and save
15.Click on Number of responsible person and choose any person , say XYZ
16.Now the authorization role is ready. This setting will ensure that any person who is assigned this role will only be able to Display the projects , if the responsible person is XYZ
17.Go back to the pervious screen. In the process Generate the profile also.
18.Once you are in Change Roles Screen, go to tab USER. Here you can assign this role ZPSTEST to various users.
Reward points if useful.
Regards

About account assignment group in Sales Order.

Hi gurus,
I am working in SD for the first time and I am facing below problem
1. Material code was created with account assignment group (MVKE-KTGRM) as blank (Sales Org 2 view)
2. Later this material was entered in Sales Order.
3. Subsequently Sales Order BOM and Production Order were made against this material.
4. We maintained account assignment group in material master after creation of Sales order but account assignment group was not updated in Sales Order.
5. Now the field is gray out or non-editable is there any way by which we can maintain account assignment group in the sales order.
6. As the field is non editable we are unable to do Invoice by VF01.
Is there any way by which we can maintain account assignment group in Sales Order??
Edited by: Deepak Kulkarni on Mar 6, 2012 2:09 PM

Hi
As you have mentioned that you have maintained the acct assignment grp in the material master after the order was created, it will not appear in the sales order item already created and it will only reflect in new orders and changes to existing orders for that material.
Proposed solution:
If it is order related billing that you are doing, then goto VA02 and delete and re-enter the item with same material and qty.
The account assignment group will appear.
If the item is delivery related and if the delivery has already been created but PGi not done, then delete the delivery and then delete the item in the sales order and re-enter the item as told above. If PGI also done, then reverse the PGI, delete the delivery and re-enter as suggestd in above scenarios.
The account assignment group will appear in the billing document document tab in item level.
Regards
Madhu

Material Availability check during work order creation and Release

Hello All,
We are checking material availability at creation as well as release
Say we have Material XYZ=100 in stock MMBE
Now XYZ =100 is say at normal storage location =75
and scrap storage location=05 and serviceable =20
Currently when availability check is performed it checks for 95 (It excludes scrap storage location 05 )
but we want Availability check to be only for normal stock =75 and not for Serviceable and Scrap location
how to do this in configuration or via exits
Since if the material is under Scrap location it is not counting in Availability check at work order creation this logic is working fine but I do know from where this control is put that when the material is in the stock of scrap it is not counting in Availability check for work orders.Same thing I want to extend it to Serviceable stock .
Why not it is consider it for Scrap storage location , what is config or any MM enhancement
So that when Availability check run it will not consider Materials at SCRAP as well as SERVISABLE storage location also.
Please have your views on this
Regards
pratap

Hello
There are two option for your requiement
1. Changing the status of the servisable storage location stock to restricted use stock . You can include or exclude this stock status material in OPJJ. This solution is not storage location dependent. It is stock status dependent.
2. Please refer the enhancement for the storage location determination. I am not sure about this funtionality:
For production orders the following enhancement is available:
PPCO0005 enhancement for storage loc. determination/backflushing
You can use this enhancement to change the storage location and the indicator 'backflushing' in the reservation.
The enhancement PPCO0005 contains the following enhancement components:
Function exit
EXIT_SAPLCOSD_001 storage location determination/backflushing
You can find the description in modification text of the function exit.
You can find an example of the user exit in the function group XC01 in the include LXCO1F05.
warm regards
Ramakrishna

How to stop PR creation from PM work order for a particular vendor?

Hello Experts,
We have following scenario for breakdown maintenance activities.
When a machine breaks down, a breakdown order is created in SAP. The external manintenance services are planned in the order. When the order is released, a single PR (with multiple item numbers corresponding to number of services) is created by SAP. The PR has a release strategy. When PR is released, PO is created followed by the SES.
The practice followed AS -IS for breakdown outside business hours:- If the breakdown happens outside business working hours, the person releasing the PRs is not available & hence PR can not be released resulting in no PO & no subsequent SES.
In this case, the maintenance is completed by the external agency & the work order is TECO. The next day, TECO is reveresed, new PR is created, released, converted into PO, & then SES.
TO-BE process:- Client expects that, for certain vendors identified, PR should not get created at all from the breakdown order. (The list of vendors will be maintained seperately). For these vendors, a framework order will be created at the start of fiscal year & SES will be created as & when required agaainst the framework order.
My concern is :- How to stop PR creation from PM work order for a particular vendor? OR delete the created PR?
Highly appreciate your quick response.
Thank you.
Amit
Note:- My ABAP consultant has checked following BADI's, but could not find it useful.
IWO1_ORDER_BADI
ORDER_COSTING_CK
DATA_EXTENSION_CK
VALUATION_CK
ME_REQ_OI_EXT
IWO1_PREQ_BADI
ME_CHECK_SOURCES
ME_REQ_POSTED
IWO1_ORDER_BADI

Dear Amit
I am giving a different dimension to your question check if it fulfills your requirement -
As we know Vendor selection comes at a later stage only after your PR creation, approval & RFQ etc. & PR generation from maintaine. order is controllled through control key PM03. While triggering PR from order you have to specify Material group, Purchase group and vendor. Try to control it through authorisation as all these are authorisation objects. The persons executing breakdown order shall no t be given this authoriations
shakti

Authorization group in Work order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for